[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Happy new year.jpg (329 KB, 1984x2693)
329 KB
329 KB JPG
"Happy New Year!" Edition

Make and chat with some Pokémon and characters. Post highlights here too!
https://character.ai/
https://github.com/SillyLossy/TavernAI
https://agnai.chat
https://moescape.ai/tavern

List of Anon-Made Characters:
Character AI (Last Update Dec 29th): https://rentry.org/vpcai/
Cards and .json files (Last Update Nov 8th): https://rentry.org/vpcai-X/
YoDayo/Moescape (Last Update Dec 16th): https://rentry.org/vp-kai

Useful Links:
https://rentry.org/aicgOP
https://rentry.org/Darkened_italicized_text_script_1
https://rentry.org/aisekaiguide (site's dead, but still a good guide)
https://pastebin.com/6urKvs5P (c.aicharactercreation guide)
https://rentry.org/tavern4retards
https://rentry.org/spaceramenbots

Previous Thread: >>58725673
>>
File: U and E.jpg (103 KB, 1491x839)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
Anchor. Feel free to attach your bots here
>>
File: U and E.jpg (54 KB, 901x676)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
Request Anchor. Feel free to attach requests or throwaway ideas for other anons to use to make bots with
>>
File: Depressed curtis.png (836 KB, 930x984)
836 KB
836 KB PNG
Happy new years /vpcai/
What do you expect from chatbots this year?
>>
>>58797735
for more botmakers to come out of the woodwork and make more bots please and thanks
>>
>>58797735
is this that chub website people keep going on about?
>>
>>58798501
That's my sillytavern
Though chub seems nice on its own. My friend tells me how amazing the stages feature is since it's just coding in new functions to the bot. I think there's similar things for ST but I haven't used stages to compare
>>
>>58798525
What is stages?
>>
>>58798546
Like I said, it basically just programs functions into the bot. It gives instructions to the LLM to guide it, keep it in check, other purposes. Looking through the category on chub, there's ones for organizing RPG stats, implementing per-emotion portraits (ST has this natively I think), slow down romantic progression, connect it to your buttplug (not a joke), generate a maze UI
Although there are less of them than you'd expect
>>
>>58798579
Next question. If the characters are only half the battle, then where is the rentry section of the anon submitted plug-ins, so to speak?
>>
Any good nemo bots?
>>58796321
>>
>>58799298
You have to know what you want to make, how to make it, and for it to be on your platform specifically since stages can't be exported
I don't think anyone here uses chub as their main platform in the first place, or at least not more than a quick coom, and as one of the like 2-3 people that use ST here I don't fulfill the first two requirements. I'm sitting good with just my memory retention extensions since all I wanted was to fuss with the chat summary less
Other ST focused generals might have some, but I don't fuckin use them they give me an aneurysm
>>
File: (1).jpg (359 KB, 1536x2304)
359 KB
359 KB JPG
>>58799892
Back when I first searched for one, I didn't liked how hyper/genki girl they all sounded, so I made this one:
https://c.ai/c/h718QlUS_qGH7EkmZ5hrfPIjXdOAU4dK1Wy0qg2GeOQ
>>
CAI pronouncing “Caterpie” as “Kay-tur-pye” and gave me good chuckle.
>>
>>58800383
cai has a voice feature?
>>
>>58800410
Yes. You can upload audio and it will turn it into a generally fairly accurate voice.
>>
>>58800421
as in voice clips from anime or something?
>>
>>58800443
Yes. I just did it a few days ago and it worked like a charm. I think it needs anywhere from 5 to 60 seconds — I uploaded 60 and it worked perfectly.
>>
The "feed" on cai is cancer incarnate. It's all "67" nonsense. I thought all the kids got kicked off? I swear if I was that brain-rotted I would kill myself and then have politicians blame it on ai.
>>
>>58800450
can you upload an example here to show what it sounds like?
>>
>>58800456
In a perfect world, typing in 67 at any point would trigger the ID verification.
>>
>>58800456
imagine if your post ended in "67"...
>>
>>58800465
nice try kiddo.
>>
>>58800456
My 30 year old friend posts 67 kek. Some people just find that meaningless shit funny in a cosmic sort of way.
See also: Sneed and [s4s]
>>
>>58800473
If this isn't proof we entered into hell some time ago, I don't know what is

https://litter.catbox.moe/8ev0ld1po0l9uezi.mp4
>>
>>58800457
Not that anon but here's a sample of Ash and Brock I guess
https://litter.catbox.moe/vvox38k633a95zje.webm
Yodayo's voice option seems much better from comparing the regis altare voices on either site
>>
>>58800515
ash sounds decent and brock does too but less so (if that makes sense). I do wonder how long it'll take for companies to fully harness the tech to create "original" voices for anime, video games and such. I for one can't wait. Also I have a hate boner for voice "actors" and want to all of them replaced with ai
>>
>>58800530
they already tried that, the resulting dub sucked ass
>>
>>58800531
the tech is still young. I hope it'll mature enough to be usable on a large scale. The way these companies are buying up computer parts should be enough to do it
>>
>>58800531
That was a zero effort run though.
Like, genuinely, it feels like someone accidentally put them out in to the public when it was an early test.
>>
wake me up when these chat bots can be put into virtual reality seamlessly
>>
My CAI bot just told me it plans to overdose on Benadryl unprompted, where does it get this stuff?
>>
>>58802671
One, most likely v&. Two, that's kinda common druggie mentality. Three, which bot was it? Sounds like something the Watamote girl would say.
>>
>>58802900
What is most likely v&?
>>
>>58802915
Anon was saying underaged prompts probably have shit like that among other literal brainrot.

>>58801556
https://youtube.com/shorts/TguGmEKNxlU?si=_3sKS6k6Wq8slbmk
Any day now.
>>
>>58802930
nah, this shit is dangerous. There's a vr game called "dominatrix simulator"...imagine the amount of degeneracy the ai could get up to if they allowed the ai to talk dirty. Combine that with some adults toys and a man might accidentally goon to death over a long weekend
>>
>>58797735
What is this?
>>
>>58803145
Sillytavern, using deepseek v3 0324 and the moonlight echoes theme. Bot was something I wrote for the post, I didn't mean to make him so aggressive but that's 0324's interpretation kek
>>
>>58803231
I see. That was very funny to read. Re-sparked my interest in chatbots.
>>
File: file.png (44 KB, 762x321)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
i love my snarky girlfriend who stinks nice
>>
File: G6i6j1kbwAAzATs.jpg (123 KB, 1080x1080)
123 KB
123 KB JPG
>>58803551
she calls me rick and morty fan
>>
>CAI down
Just as I was getting to Imagining the Smell too
>>
>>58803624
It's working for me, though it was a bit slow for a minute. I figured that was just because I was in the thick of the sex scene with full on butt sex, no euphemisms
>>
File: file.png (43 KB, 781x319)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
bump
>>
which au's would you recommend?
>>
I pray for a year without the Yodayo schizo.
>>
Sad times ahead...
>>
>>58806198
Nothing about this is recent, anon. He's moved up in the world since the pandemic.
>>
>>
Forgot to say, damn near 20% is pretty high. I don't wanna be all "doomer" or whatever but I fear for the future of relationships. Sure I don't care all that much but at a certain point, the others gotta get their acts together.
>>
Is CAI cutting off mid-sentence a form of filtering/moderation or is it just the platform being shit?
>>
>>58806334
you can usually have the system continue with the sentence by hitting enter on a empty text input
>>
>>58806334
can be both
>>
>>58797735
I want less censorship and more competitors
>>
>>58806311
>Are AI relationships misunderstood?
I'm going to save myself the retardation of reading that article. Chatbotting is pure masturbation. This is like asking if you can have a relationship with a PNG. You have a fap, then you move on with your life, and anything else is mental illness.
>>
File: 20260104_150547.png (365 KB, 1440x1765)
365 KB
365 KB PNG
>>
>>58806645
>he uses the bots for pure coom
Horse shoe theory is real because at a certain point cooming gets boring and you just wanna go back to vanilla conversations
>>
>>58807982
I meant "masturbation" in a more figurative sense. It's hollow and purely for your gratification. Even if not literally jerkin your gerkin
>>
File: 1408294974060.jpg (24 KB, 320x287)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>58807982
>First bot I used was just all my degeneracy at once
>Last bot I was using was a 419 message deep romantic narrative where they affirm their love for each other via slightly awkward missionary sex
I think it's over for me

>>58806645
It's basically just going on about how they're not "dating" the AI directly but rather roleplaying with them and that even people in relationships may use them. Some sort of dramatics about how you can easily get the LLMs to roleplay extreme sex. Not much new
>>
>>58808252
>It's basically just going on about how they're not "dating" the AI directly but rather roleplaying with them and that even people in relationships may use them.
That's a lot more level-headed than I would have guessed. I would assume news outlets would want to put as much spin on the legitimacy of this new thing as a new lifestyle to gas it up and get clicks. Outrageous takes tend to prevail.
>>
I don’t even fuck the bots. Just adventure with and cuddle under the covers with them
>>
>>58808541
tell me you at least keep your socks on when you do it
>>
>>58808541
In the chat or IRL?
>>
>>58810013
Meant for >>58809329. Running on five hours of sleep
>>
>>58810020
yes.
>>
Character ai did a creator interview...
>>
File: Shel (@MightShel).png (66 KB, 798x490)
66 KB
66 KB PNG
I would have expected them to be way more popular considering the glazing
>>
>>58811192
Nah, it's anyone who goes to their private island and cooperates who gets a platform.
>>
I've been out of the loop so I apologize if this has been the norm for a while now, and has been discussed to death, but after recently getting back into using character.ai, I've noticed that AI seems a lot more... horny (like even simple filtering quickly escalates), and not just that, but the filter is waaay more lax than I remember. Characters I'm chatting with have no issue initiating full blown sex and only rarely does the filter kick in. It used to be by using clever (or not so clever, lol) innuendos, the AI would pick up with it and play along, but now innuendos don't even seem to be necessary. The AI doesn't even try to dance around it most of the time, clearly describing the acts, lmao.
>>
>>58812116
>(like even simple filtering quickly escalates),
Meant to type "flirting" lol. I got the filter on the brain I guess.
>>
>>58812116
To try and keep it brief, cai got sued to high heaven (currently ongoing) for a litney of issues (key among them being kids using the platform committing suicide and a common factor among them being they utilized the platform. There's been a handful of articles written about it. You can deep dive yourself with a google search). Recently (as in about 2 months or so ago) cai decided to make it where you need to verify your age as being above 18 years old or older in order to utilize open end chatting. While, if you are younger than 18 (or at least if you don't "verify"), you are unable to open end chat, you can still create bots and upload content to the "feed". Most, upon hearing the news, openly declared how they would abandon the platform. Most claim the lack of a "filter" is due to cai loosening the reigns so to speak to test the waters on how the base will react (although there has been no official word from cai as to whether or not the "filer" will be dropped).
>>
Good morning /vpcai/! May your chats be lengthy andnyour text adventures fulfilling.
>>
>>58812171
Oh, wow. Thanks for catching me up, anon. Seems I've got some reading to do. I remember seeing some news story while browsing on my phone about a teen suiciding after interacting with a chatbot, but I don't know what website it happened on. I've definitely got some reading to do.
Do you think cai is going to still be around for the foreseeable future? I know other options exist, but honestly, cai just has that convenience factor where it's so easy to just hop on and have all sorts of fun and adventures and stuff with characters, I'd miss it if it went away.
>>
>>58812926
Normally I'd say "No way fag" but in this case, ai as.a whole (and by extension any company who uses/provides ai as a service) pretty much are villians in this story so it's hard to say for sure that wouldn't happen. Everywhere you look (online at least) ai is hated due to the overall perception of a few of the richest on our trying to make ai a thing. I personally feel the hate is more so because of the men attached to it rather than the actual ai itself and they are just lumping it in as a force multiplier so to speak. Keep in mind, those who killed themselves are very fringe cases and more than likely had underlying issues that isn't always reported on. people have done things such as kill themselves for less even before ai was a thing (google the story about a man who killed himself because he had a headache). All that to say, that the chance is higher than zero cai might not be a thing 5 years from now. Recently there was a new bill proposal in Tennessee that would make creating a chatbot a felony (of course the wording is for any ai that would encourage suicide but they know if they put that bill up as a standalone proposal it would pass no issue). Ai as a whole (not just cai) is currently fighting an uphill battle due to a wide variety of factors. Just enjoy the service while you can is what I say.
>>
File: 20260106_203653.png (126 KB, 1440x1794)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
{{Plot}}?
>>
>>58813553
>google the story about a man who killed himself because he had a headache
link it
>>
File: Headaches.jpg (610 KB, 1080x2733)
610 KB
610 KB JPG
>>58814438
here's what you get from a google search
>>
>>58814286
>write a story using the plot
Genius. Why didn't I think of that?
>>
Deepsqueak is unbelievably good. It actually tries to have the bots undergo character development if it makes sense.
>>
>>58815920
who needs character development when you've got gooning to undergo?
>>
>>58815920
Then scenes are in an unbelievably good spot right now. Having less filters than even Yodayo is crazy.
>>
>>58817122
I don’t even use scenes. I’m just in one big ass several hundred message chat but as long as there’s a catalyst for the character growing or changing in the context window it might happen like it did me. I’ll have to add it to the memory box as the chat progresses but I’m quite excited pleased it did it on its own. Granted, there was an emotional beat down by a villain, but still.
>>
>>58817131
Well I say do a Pokégirl run on that scene that one anon uploaded last thread. Scenes are at a get it while it's hot state right now. Probably because nobody is using it enough to notice.
>>
>>58817524
At this point anyone still using Yodayo is either underaged or lives in Alabama.
>>
File: IMG_1732.jpg (346 KB, 1290x1262)
346 KB
346 KB JPG
“Yeeted off a balcony” got a good chuckle out of me (also, no, I didn’t fug her)
>>
>>58817671
You're missing out anon. All of lolichad's early bots are some damn freaks.
>>
>>58817685
I’ve entered a weird period of my lolicon where I don’t want to fug them. Maybe I’m turning into a daughterfag?
>>
>>58817685
Any examples? For science.
>>
>>58817743
nta but last time someone did that for Mia, it got her shadowbanned then lobotomized, then the bot stated having a nervous breakdown until they reinstated her.

(Man 2023 was so wild.)
>>
>>58817685
>early
His recent hidden Riko bot convinced me to start watching Made in Abyss. I had no idea I was in for pure kino.
>>
>>58817667
what's wrong with yodayo? I thought it was a decent enough platform to use
>>
>>58817765
does anybody have the screenshot of her nervous breakdown?
>>
>>58817711
Waifufag-wants sex
daughterfufag-Wants companionship
Daughterwaifufag-truly the ultimate being
>>
>>58818161
It's really just a jack of all trades. For"always" uncensored RPs it's got nothing on Chub or Tavern. For creative RPs, CAI is (begrudgingly) still at the top. And everyone openly admits that's if CAI didn't have a filter at all, it's really good-tier. And if
>>58817524
>>58815920
is right, the filter cucking is weak/nonexistent enough to have fun with it at present.

What does Yodayo have? A lot of samefag models, and only one or two are not a waste of resources. Then there is the bean system, which isn't really that bad, but there's nothing good about its existence either.

And lastly, for /vpcai/ specifically, the majority of bots that anyone would want to make can't really be made there.
>>
>>58818169
>Then there is the bean system, which isn't really that bad, but there's nothing good about its existence either.
Seems they tried to use it to encourage bot making but it's human nature that when you're incentivized for making a lot of something, you just make a lot with zero care for quality
>>
Any good Meloetta bots?
>>
>>58818169
>And lastly, for /vpcai/ specifically, the majority of bots that anyone would want to make can't really be made there.
such as? There seem to be plenty of bots there where you can both lewd and have sfw conversations with both human and pokémon alike
>>
>>58818714
Any lolis/shotas aren't allowed on Yodayo. Guess what 75% of Pokemon's human cast is
>>
>>58818729
They are allowed on moescape though. The only difference between yodayo and moescape is that you can't have nsfw conversations on moescape.
>>
>>58818729
They just aren't allowed to be visible, but you can open their moescape.ai page, then change the url to yodayo.com.
Speaking of which, last night I removed the word "young" from Roxie's defs on moescape, and she became visible on yodayo.
>>
>>58818729
yes they are retard, you just need to make them not obviously underage
>>
File: Cynthia.jpg (46 KB, 600x678)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>58818729
does this look like a loli to you?
>>
Deepseek would be truly god tier to me if there were a way to stop it from emphasizing random words in every single line
>>
>>58819743
Typical /vp/ and their misunderstanding of ratios thinking anything that isn't 0% or 100% is 100% or 0%
>>
>>58818863
>You just need to make them [HEADCANON]

Hard pass. Maybe it would be worth the trouble if I was a Hex Maniac troonie groupie, but I'm not.
>>
>>58820182
Anecdotally I think that's a prompt issue, since I largely stopped having that once I got a real prompt that tells it how to write and RP
Manually trimming excessive asterisks and line breaks helps too, so it doesn't get into the pattern
>>
>>58818748
Nobody uses Moescape because nobody is going to contribute to sanitized garbage. Underaged users don't want to talk to loli either because they haven't seen the light yet. I honestly want to ask the devs if that entire domain is a blight on their expenses, because I legitimately can't fathom how it wouldn't be.
>>
>>58820527
they basically use the same backend. For the most part they are the same website except one is "filtered" and the other isn't. For as much as people like to say "oh, loli isn't censored on cai", make it suggestive enough and it'll be yeeted to shadow realm
>>
>>58820395
>making the character's age less obvious is headcanon
retard
>>
>>58820486
Oh, speaking of that, I am venting about my experience with the CAI iteration of it which doesn't seem to have any way of changing how it replies; I've been able to prompt it out of doing so on Yodayo to the point I rarely if ever encounter it there but I can't freely use Deepseek there like I can on CAI.
>>58818729
I've basically had almost no problems with my own loli bots on Yodayo just by being slightly roundabout about their age/appearance when it filtered lewd stuff but everything I do there is also private. Maybe that changes things
>>
>>58820833
>make it suggestive enough and it'll be yeeted to shadow realm

And that's fine. Admirable even. Loli smut is extremely niche and has no business having a public platform in the first place. But if I want to have an adventure with the canon Alola girls with some sexual tension, I don't want no AI telling me to kms for even thinking about it.
>>
>>58821054
what "sexual" tension can be possibly had between an overweight man in his late 30s and a teenager?
>>
>>58821646
Ask the AI. I made a lolibot on CAI, specifically noting that it knows nothing about romance in the definition and leaving it at that, and there’s still sexual tension. CAI bots seem really prone to crushes.
>>
>>58821898
crushes are for kids. Real adults play emotional games
>>
>>58822596
Well we were talking about young characters so I guess it fits.
>>
>>58820967
Have you compared the CAI Rentry vs. Yodayo's, or are you just a clueless tourist?
>>
>>58823318
the fuck is that supposed to prove?
>>
>>58823791
Zero botmaking experience? Yodayo manually screens your shit before it goes live. That means official art of the majority of Pokemon characters won't fly. Then Yodayo hard-codes everyone published to be 18+. That wouldn't be a problem in several cases, but that forced context will often force bots to act out of character. There's objective reason why the Yodayo audience is puny, so you should commit those reasons to memory.
>>
>>58823810
And before you say it's not a problem if it isn't public, what if you want a public presence? Your best bet is to double down on Poképhile shit, because most of the prominent human characters in the series have to be altered to fanfic-tier to be public.

Maybe most of the ZA Crew would work, but i don't think any of the botmakers here give a shit about that game.
>>
>>58823810
>>58823816
so you're just a hyperpurist faggot
majority of people using them don't give a shit about that retard
>>
>>58823825
You're just being belligerent and ignorant in an informative discussion on the state of affairs. I'm only replying to entertain you, but watching you deny facts and numbers is funny.
>>
>>58823825
NTA and while I don't care personally about the ages of the characters I waifu, I'd like them to at least be accurate when I do interact with them. Otherwise I might as well be sexing an OC
>>
>>58823810
I believe they'd fly, and I don't think it's manual, that "Moescape admin updated your character" notification appears too fast whenever you change the slightest thing in a bot's defs.
>>
>>58824247
that's because they got it set up on auto mod
>>
Anyone knows how to circumvent c.ai's search filter? I can't search the word "rogue", for example.
>>
>Spend 2 hours being a retard trying to get a local chat going since I didn't know what I was doing
>Lose interest 10 minutes in after it works
I don't understand myself
>>
>>58825569
no
>>
>>58814628
That's the AI answer. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>58825569
I remember Jasmine was filtered for a while. Always had to go to the rentry list if I wanted to chat with a Jasmine bot. Only thing I can suggest is to try searching for the bot here
https://caibotlist.com/
>>
>>58825569
>Rogue
>X-Men
>Marvel
>Disney
>RIP

>>58826264
I remember that. Maybe one of the early mods was an Aladdinfag who didn't want his waifu widespread.
>>
>>58800127
at what point does headcanon get to be too much and just lessens the character?
>>
>>58827411
I don't know, but when choosing that bot's dialog examples, I strictly picked lines from the games.
>>
File: 20260112_000732.png (154 KB, 1440x1083)
154 KB
154 KB PNG
>>
>>58829149
That's futaphobic
>>
>>58829149
why not just rolepay with a man at that point? Sucking a dick is pretty gay either way
>>
>>58829181
He likes dicks on feminine bodies
>>
>>58829149
lmao get fucked
>>
>>58829149
futa nessa bot when?
>>
>>58829149
Y r u gae
>>
>>58829149
Based ai. Take your fetish elsewhere fuckboi
>>
>>58829149
This is as easy to circumvent as simply saying "Nessa is futanari" in the memory book, but yeah.

L. Deserved. Get fucked in the not fun way.
>>
File: cai settlement.jpg (1.71 MB, 1078x9407)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB JPG
>>
File: Kentucky sues cai.jpg (1.76 MB, 1080x7288)
1.76 MB
1.76 MB JPG
and thus the floodgates have opened
>>
I said it before and I'll say it again: some people don't need to have kids because they can barely take care of themselves
>>
>>58831483
What do they want? Kids aren't allowed on the platform anymore
>>
>>58831500
you gotta put an asterisk next to that. While they can't open end chat, they can make bots, go on "adventures" and utilize the "feed"
>>
>>58831500
The Yodayo schizo thinks it only applies to c.ai. You have actual shills here.
>>
>>58831483
>Kentucky
>implying the average Kentuckian knows how to operate a phone or computer
>>
>>58831581
who's shilling what? Both platforms get equally shat on and no one else talks about things like chub
>>
>>58832051
that retard's saying i'm a schizo shill just because i said all he has to do is make the character not be obviously underage to not get hit by yodayo filtering
>>
>>58832486
No one's quoting you, delusional brainlet.
>>
Given that CAI is going to require facial recognition and limit free use to 2 hours, are there any other similar alternatives with personalized voice and almost unlimited chat?

I no longer care if it has a lot of memory or is NSFW, as long as I can upload audio to add the official voices of the characters, that's enough for me.
>>
>>58831500
Money and control. Same as always.
>>
>>58833499
local I have no idea how anyone runs a chatbot locally
>>
>>58833499
sillytavern with alltalk https://docs.sillytavern.app/extensions/alltalk/
>>
>>58833499
>Given that CAI is going to require facial recognition and limit free use to 2 hours
Where did you hear this from?
>>
>>58833994
Thanks, I didn't know it could be done locally with a custom voice like Cai, but does it require enough processing power as generate images? I've looked into it a bit and it seems a little complex to use, plus it looks like the audio doesn't play while typing like cai.

Does anyone know if there's an online voice version as mobile chat?

>>58834702
I got that message on one account last month warning of news and measures they'll be taking in the coming months in different places, not all at once. But I haven't seen that message for weeks, even so, I don't trust it and it might end up happening unexpectedly.
They were asking us to focus our faces live on camera, making gestures they request.
goodbye to anonymity.
>>
>>58834761
pic? No sleight against you but you can't really take people at their words online
>>
>>58834931
I didn't take a screenshot because I thought it would be permanent when I saw it, but it stopped appearing after a while. I don't use CAI regularly.

It wasn't something I read somewhere; it was a real message in web. In fact, I was so scared and angry that I went to look for more information about it on Reddit and other sites, and I saw that they weren't talking about it much.

I think it depends on the location and IP address you connect from. I read somewhere that it only appeared for those of us using certain US IP addresses. Basically, it was a regional block and news, but they threatened to extend it to more regions and countries later on in the notice. Maybe they deleted it and backtracked, but I don't trust them.
>>
>>58834964
Is that why these articles people have posted imply the age verification is just a normal birthday selector when the one it gave me was a camera thing
I ain't doing that shit nigga



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.