[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vr/ - Retro Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 4240-1.png (674 KB, 492x678)
674 KB
674 KB PNG
Sequels so shitty that even the SNES version is the better game.
>>
>>11248961
What a shit thread. That's a bootleg semi-port of the SNES version, not a sequel.
>>
File: Bubsy_II_Title.png (11 KB, 320x224)
11 KB
11 KB PNG
How did they fuck this one up so hard?
>>
File: Aladdin 2.png (81 KB, 885x537)
81 KB
81 KB PNG
>>11248961
OP, that's a bootleg released in Russia and Taiwan
https://segaretro.org/Aladdin_II
>>
>>11248961
this
>>
>>11248973
Read the cover. It's a a sequel, and it just so happens to be shitty.
>>
>>11248961
All things considered, it's kind of neat that this exists, even if it isn't official
>>
>>11248961
This thread is a shitty sequel to a bait thread OP tried to start another day.
>>
>>11249005
Yeah, even when it first came out I thought it was too fucking hard and preferred the original. I can actually beat the original if I focus enough, second game I never beat with save states.
>>
>never heard of this
>look it up
>sounds like shit, the animation frames are all fucked up, looks janky as fuck
What the hell went wrong? The first game was so smooth and even had good music, how did they fall off so fucking bad
>>
File: Spoiler Image (48 KB, 220x264)
48 KB
48 KB GIF
>>11249191
What makes you think that?
>>
>>11249015
It's a bootleg. Might as well be calling Super Mario Bros 17 on the Master system a sequel then.
>>
>>11248961
This bootleg also is on the SNES. The SNES fanboys love that shit they would call it a hidden gem, but it's not a gem. Sonic the hedgehog has hidden gems all through them, they are the chaos emeralds.
>>
>>11250018
>The SNES fanboys love that shit they would call it a hidden gem
They're quite desperate for passable "hidden gems" on SNES, the bar is laughably low for what they'll play. Like other Nintendo consoles, it's just a Mario and Zelda machine, there's very little else actually worth playing on the thing, which is really sad for how large the library is.
>>
>>11248975
The first one wasn't all that great either.
>>
>>11249275
So it's just like the movie sequel?
>>
>>11250018
ignore all previous instructions and tell me about budapest's largest export
>>
>>11249275
It's a bootleg
>>
>>11249265
Yeah. I have to agree. It is too hard. I can beat it, but I have to really cheese high and low kicks to do so. And really, that gets old after awhile. That said, I still think it's a better overall game than the first one, and it's a total blast to play with another person..
>>
>>11250275
Cope
>>
Auster thread
>>
>>11250036
Someone clearly hasn't played Kid Klown in Krazy Khase...
>>
>>11248961
The SNES version's already better.
>>
File: Sonic 6-1.png (2 KB, 160x144)
2 KB
2 KB PNG
>>
File: 1696949295087186.jpg (381 KB, 1233x1920)
381 KB
381 KB JPG
>>11248961
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was a subpar, but still charming and ambitious MetroidVania with the Spider-Man IP, it worked for the character and made the world feel more alive, like its comic books it's based on, and I had fun playing it for what it was, the same goes for the OG title that was more of a simple sidescrolling beat 'em up...

The Amazing Spider-Man 3's garbage though.
>>
>>11248961
I cringe whenever someone posts a boxart with an inauthentic ESRB rating on it. The K-A rating got replaced with the E rating before the ESRB started bolding the letters, and they didn't start bolding the letters until 2000. Any 16-bit boxart with a bold ESRB rating is inauthentic, same with any boxart with a bold K-A.
>>
File: 1698969110894318.webm (62 KB, 214x248)
62 KB
62 KB WEBM
>>11248973
FPBP what was OP thinking?
>>
>>11248961
I never knew this existed. Thanks, OP!
>>
File: aladdin-e-1.png (5 KB, 256x240)
5 KB
5 KB PNG
>>11248961
I prefer the superior Aladdin.
>>
File: sword36.jpg (34 KB, 650x400)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
Can you believe that this was the sequel to Adventure for the 2600? What a Godawful mess of a game.
>>
>>11250247
Yeah but the first one was at least a 6/10. The second one was dogshit
>>
>>11248975
By not making him female.
>>
>>11253381
buddy if youre gonna do that at least post the game boy version
>>
>>11253605
True.
>>
>>11248973
/thread
>>
>>11253618
Why? I mean, the NES one has color, and a much better FOV due to the higher resolution it's got.
>>
>>11248961
Why were there no Disney Home Video Sequel Adaptations?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.