[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vr/ - Retro Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: th.jpg (29 KB, 474x266)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
Why is this game so worshipped?
I mean, it's not bad by any means but it's a clear downgrade when compared to 1 and 3:
> Dark gritty atmosphere that doesn't really fit the franchise
> Graphics aged much worse than both 1 and 3
> Very little variety in locations
> Doesn't take full advantage of being 3D and most levels are linear as fuck
> Gameplay is much slower than 1 and has less variety than 3
>>
File: 3252.jpg (59 KB, 1280x720)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>11503782
>Dark gritty atmosphere that doesn't really fit the franchise
It's literally the best atmosphere in the franchise. Scrimblos in inconsequential, colorful places are dime a dozen and get forgotten quickly.
Not this fable, though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgVSifw_Ucs
>>
Because what it does it does it very well (artstyle, graphics, story, gameplay, level design & gimmicks, etc..), and even if its dark it still goofy and humorous, just not as cartoony as 1 or wacky as 3.
>Compared to 1 and 3
1 is way too difficult and having to get all cages to fight the final boss sucks, 2 is very easy yes but the game is so fun the easy difficulty isn't that much of an issue.
3 is a mixed bag, it has great graphics, music and combat but everything else is hit or miss like the comedy or the platforming, the score system also isn't very intuitive and the rewards aren't worth getting 100% score on each level and the gimmick levels aren't that fun besides funkyboard and snowboarding.
What I'm saying is that 2 is very well balanced in general and that's why it receives the most praise in the series.
>>
because it was impressive while also being good
any other questions?
>>
>>11503782
>Rayman 1
nobody asked for a sidescroller goofy ass nigga
>>
>>11503782
Rayman 1 is a terrible eurojank sidescroller with a masochistic second act and an incoherent, disturbing art style. Rayman 3 is a shitty by-the-numbers 6th gen 3D platformer that ruined everything good about R2, complete with a new rendition of Murfy who spouts unfunny quips and movie references every 30 seconds. Also, I don't care what anyone thinks, shooting energy balls was 10x cooler than reverting to muh fists with shitty powerups. Even Rayman Arena is better than 1 and 3. Rayman 2 is fucking awesome.
>>
>>11504497
>>11504529
Fuck off fags.
>>
>>11504529
>shooting energy balls was 10x cooler than reverting to muh fists with shitty powerups
based man who fires rays
>>
File: 45407.png (128 KB, 750x650)
128 KB
128 KB PNG
>>11503782
>>
>>11503798
Rayman 2 is basically peak euro soul
You just can’t get that feel from a burger or nip game
>>
>>11504529
Rayman also shoots energy balls in 3, it's just that he can only shoot out two at a time.
>>
>>11505150
Hold the fucking phone, I always thought she was naked and the purple stuff was body paint. You mean to tell me she was clothed the whole time?
>>
This game is one of those "rented it and got stuck, and it's lived rent free in my mind ever since" games for me. I was 8 so I'm sure I just missed some obvious telegraphed way to proceed, but I wondered for years what the rest of the game was like. Maybe it's time to settle the score and unearth some repressed memories about being molested in the process
>>
>>11503782
First of all there's nothing wrong with its atmosphere and second of all saying that its atmosphere didn't fit the franchise doesn't make sense when you're talking about the game that made it a franchise. I don't hate the first game or anything but it's highly flawed and very easily could have ended up like hundreds of other platformers of the time that were one off then forgotten about. you're tripping if you honestly think 2 isn't a massive improvement over it and just a much more polished game overall.
>>
File: 327px-Tily_Model.png (186 KB, 327x599)
186 KB
186 KB PNG
>>11505150
>genuinely wasn't included in arena and substituted with tily for being "too big" like le ridely in smash memes
>>
>>11504529
>Rayman 3 is a shitty by-the-numbers 6th gen 3D platformer

its not. its very tightly paced, never a dull moment
rayman 2 emphasizes atmosphere and mood over gameplay

rayman 3 also has a better soundtrack
>>
>>11505689
Do it, the game is worth it.
>>
>>11503782
>> Graphics aged much worse than both 1 and 3
The graphics were mind blowing on my PC in the 90s. Nothing ran nearly as smooth and looked as good on my machine. I only had the demo but I loved it and the atmosphere of the game
>>
>>11503834
how far away are the stars?
>>
>>11503782
3 sucked. just a bunch of boring ad hoc style gameplay like 3D mario games.
>>
>>11505689
Just don't play the shitty PS1 version
>>
>>11503782
Gameplay wise is is a downgrade from 1 for sure, but I like the world.
>>
>>11503805
>1 is way too difficult
get gud.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.