Just beat this.Thoughts?
You first.
I liked it, but it's like a 6/10 at best really. They had some nice ideas, but not enough talent to pull them off. The automatic magnet jump/grabs felt ick because Lara would do lame little hops if there was nothing in range, and then suddenly ZOOM 6 ft up and over because there was something in the grab range. The physics had all that "we made it ourselves" charm. The constant VO chatter was a polarising thing. I thought it was cool on the first playthrough but if you had to redo sections due to jank killing you hearing the same lines repeated sucked. Gunplay was iffy. The bullet time reflex action thing was annoying. Sure, give me a special move or two, but don't make it a hard requirement to defeat certain random enemies. If I want to back off and unload, it should do more damage than that.Also, it's good you played the PS2 version. This was the first game I saw that had "next gen" shaders, requiring a modern GPU or a 360 and I'm pretty sure it's undeniable that the "next gen" graphics are much worse.
>>11511212I've only ever played The Last Revelation demothought it was kind of nifty
>>11511212They wanted some of that prince of persia sot moneyIronic considering pop3d was a tomb raider clone
>>11511379well, it's only fair. TR1 was PoP game design in 3D.
>>11511212Do you really need people to tell you what to think about a game you just fucking played? How about you form your own opinion instead of fishing for the “correct” opinion to have.
>>11511408Not OP, but it's good thread psychology. If you start a thread with "here's what I liked/disliked about X" you'll just get the board's resident live in turbo-autists who exist to shit up every thread with inane contrarianism. But leave it open ended and you deny them the rope they need to hang you. You might just get a tickle of some positivity for a short while.
>>11511421I never had to do that when making a thread. And any time I see low effort posts I just assume they’re ai these days anyway.
>>11511212Decent but too short and easyAlso too much shootingAnniversary is the best game in the trilogy
>>11511212>is that a hecking CGI woman? OMG I'M COOOOOMINGwhy were boomers like this?
Why don't you play a REAL Tom Rider game, like Angel of Darkness?
>>11511421>you'll just get the board's resident live in turbo-autists who exist to shit up every thread with inane contrarianismThe trick is to discuss topics outside their native boards. The local autists won't know enough to shit up the thread, and the autists who do know enough are back at the native board.
>>11511212Not retro
>>11511212that trilogy is the best of lara croft
It's still a good game. The series died with the non retro- tr2013 that one sucks
>>11511212Lara's goth gf
>>11511212It was a shitty rail game where there was no real sense of exploring, and you always went the only way you could. CD altering Lara's classic move set for that stupid annoying jog in place of how she used to run was shitty. Overall it lost all sense of puzzle-solving and exploring that the CORE-era ones had.
>>11511212on PS2 ?lol why
>>11511212Modern corridor action game. Not bad, totally worth a playthrough
>>11513575Isn’t that just off topic posting?
>>11514154The 360 has all those shit lighting effects from early 7th gen that look like shit, so the PS2 version actually looks better. Anniversary looks the same to me, but 360 doesn’t have the bug where Lara’s shoulders don’t get when in her Legend outfit like on PS2. 360 version needs to be played at 720p, though or you get a fucked up pixel line on the left side of the screen. It’s the only 360 game I’ve ever encountered that doesn’t play nice with upscaling to 1080p.
>>11511603Zoomers are cranking it to upskirts and AI.
