Did it really exist? And if so, which one had the most meaningful impact on you or at least consumed plenty of your hours as a kid.
>>12524949i beat this at least twice. it was one of two games I had. it wasn't abysmal, but it wasn't good.
>>12524949see >>12523294 shareware was fun. except when they were shit and broken.
It's only "shovelware" because those are forcefully being compared to japanese games, but on their own, and if they were released for PC, they would be considered normal games
>>12525081cmon, superman 64 IS shovelware.
>>12524949cartoon IP's like Disney games and all of that were usually decent. the real shovelware was always movie games. it's probably because they are rushed to come out at the same time as the movie.
A policy I went by as a kid was "unless you hear otherwise assume all licensed media games are trash"
>>12527037You were brainwashed by jaded xillenial faggots like Ain't It Cool News. The only thing healthier about today's society is people don't take online retards opinions as gospel anymore.
>>12525945It was mostly a dev thing. Konami and Capcom both did a lot of cartoon games, and they were generally high quality.I remember a local magazine review for Daffy Duck for the SNES saying something like "Tiny Toons games are better than Looney Tunes games, and that's because of the developers, not the cartoon characters".
Spongebob: Battle for Bikini BottomSimpsons: Hit and Runthe first two Harry Potter games for Gameboy and Gameboy Advance
>>12527131>people don't take online retards opinions as gospel anymore.Anon, I...
