Newblood's homage to true Fallout series (1&2) dropped new screenshot. What do you think about this project - how pozzed will it be and will you be able do shoot children?
>>3660813>make a ripoff>"It's a homage!"screenshot looks like trash, by the way
I'm seeing red flags friom just reviewing some of the marketing material.https://www.pcgamer.com/new-bloods-fallout-homage-will-have-first-person-combat/>First person combat instead of top down tactical combat.>Intentionally aping fallout graphics instead of trying to do something original or modern looking.This reminds me of why we never get any good RTS games anymore because every developer tries to implement some kind of "innovation" that just makes the game shittier. If these guys tried to sell their game on being a modern CRPG with new QOL features, improved top down combat & strong single player campaign experience with interesting reactivity someone might be interested. As is it looks like nostalgia bait for grognards that'll probably be a half baked nostalgia trip for dipshits who can't let go of the golden age of CRPG's. I guess that's the best we can expect from western devs and their decaying civilization, it's just a shame that the money going into these games isn't going to countries with actually interesting ideas that are eager to make their mark on the genre.
>>3660872>"Surely the biggest complaint about classic Fallout games has always been the slow n' clunky nature of the turn based combat,"Kek. Imagine playing Doom 2 and bitching about it being an FPS. Do the same thing to a turn-based game and suddenly it's fine.
>newthat image is from couple years ago
>>3660877>>3660872>combat is instanced like a JRPGPeak pokemon
>>3660869how rude i like this retro futuristic style
>>3660877i think its some japshit nigger, not moeblob this time
>>3660869How does Todd's boot taste?
>>3660869agreed, very disrespectful to my favorite Wasteland homage
>>3660813isn't this one of those fake projects people do to put on their CV?
>>3660940any other examples?
>>3660945not off memory, tears in the rain
>>3660940I doubt it. This was shown at one of the not-E3 showcases recently by a well regarded studioI'm skeptical about the JRPG transitions and first person combat, but I can look passed it if the rest of the game has quality roleplaying and quest design
>>3660948this sounds like vague fake marketing speak.
>>3660949maybe because the game is in development and all we know about is the stuff being marketed
>>3660950well, i can't look past how fake it looks and you sound
What in the fuck is this God awful thread? Good lord.
>>3660955shut the hell up
>>3660956cry more
Does this game even have a name?
>>3660813>New>OP shows image made and posted years agoLooks like a scam to me
>>3660813This game will NEVER come out, it's a scam. I've been seeing it here and there for god knows how many years. And if that's the case with games like this, usually, they turn out to be shit due to 'issues with management, funding, lack of vision, etc.'
