[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vrpg/ - Video Games/RPG

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why are Isobel and the hireling cleric both light domain selune clerics when the phb says selune's domains are life and knowledge?
>>
Because slap your cock around at night.
>>
Because the game was directed and developed by retards who didn't understand the ruleset. It's also a DOS2 mod.
>>
>>3679142
turn your monitor on.
>>
>>3679105
>Why are Isobel and the hireling cleric both light domain selune clerics when the phb says selune's domains are life and knowledge?
BG3 is homebrew, surely by this point you'd have noticed that BG3 does a lot of things differently than base 5E. Thank god for that b t w, the changes Larian made to 5E are great..
>>
>>3679105
Why do you insist on spamming these threads?
>>
>>3679162
>why are you posting rpg threads on /vrpg/?
gee, idk, retardo.
/v/ is too fast, /bgg/ on /vg/ is full of gay retards who are just waifu posting and jerking off to futas and never talk about the game. /5eg/ technically isn't bg3 and is full of gay yuros. the kind who get mad when you say jews are warlocks in a pact with the devil
>>
>>3679148
/thread
>>
>>3679105
I think I Pavlov'd myself with this character. Every time I see her I expect a nyl2 animation
>>
>>3679160
what did they change?
>>
>>3688846
They made it so you can't grapple, trip (without Battlemaster) or take the dodge action.

Those would have been too over powered.
>>
>>3689023
When the bg3 EA came out, flanking gave advantage and iirc jump didn’t provoke an AoO so every fight was your characters leaping over the heads of their melee opponents to land behind them for a backstab. Was fucking silly in a heh nothing personal kid way. Also high ground for ranged gave advantage instead of a plus two or whatever they changed it to
>>
>>3688846
they added epig exploits relating to stacking multiple actions per turn from features that normally wouldn't stack
this is somehow good because ????
>>
>>3689202
When you start poking around under the hood and looking how the game works, it's really insanely retarded. So many things unintentionally stack with each other so that you get damage bonuses repeatedly triggering other damage bonuses because they're treated as independent sources of new damage themselves, rather than themselves being triggered by something else, due to Belgian spaghetti code. And they were too pussy to admit it was an unintentional bug, so they release """honor""" mode to undo some of their stupid bugs.
>>
>>3689203
as long as we're bitching I also hate their magical item design philosophy and how it goes against how magic items should be in 5e, but only nerds care about that
>>
>>3689202
>>3689203
Actually, they intentionally left those in. In Honor Mode (which was added a year ago) it removes all the stacking and looping and even things like haste granting you your full number of attacks.

That they left them in is good for the people who want to abuse the mechanics rather than the devs taking away op combos from their single player/co-op game.

For everyone else, there's Honor Mode. If that's what you actually wanted.
>>
>>3689214
yes it was already mentioned they submitted their bugfixes as a separate difficulty mode because they were afraid of angering their rabbid normie audience thanks
>>
>>3689214
>And here’s why that’s a good thing
>>
>>3689216
Unironically, yes.

>>3689215
normies wouldn't sperg out when their exploits get nerfed.
>>
>>3689215
Yeah, sorry, missed that last part.
>>
>>3679105
The lesbians that ruined Baldur's Gate 3 for me. Everything is Isobel's fault. Kethric was right to turn from Selune if she stands for such slop.
>>
>>3689214
Loops and chains still occur in honor mode.
Lost my honor mode playthrough at the very end due to status effect looping.
>>
>>3689223
i played to that point and thought all those complaining about bg3 being woke were overblown, but then after a major fight Nightsong acts like a horny teenager and transforms into cringe dyke, act 3 in general went full retard with squid wanting to fuck (like wtf) and all immigrant talk everywhere and drag queen circus, i didnt even mind it that much but it felt like they were out of ideas so they inserted current hot social issues into baldurs gate game.
>>
>>3689230
Yep. I actually liked the EA and was excited for it. Release BG3 felt like a different game.
>>
>>3689230
That act 3 fag shit and immigrant shit soured the entire experience for me. I quickly forced myself to beat it and then un-installed it. Never played it after that and never will.
>>
>>3689118
>flanking gave advantage
it still should. With how positioning is important with turd-based combat it should give anyone an advantage that cann pull off flanking.
>>
>>3692795
>it still should. With how positioning is important with turd-based combat it should give anyone an advantage that cann pull off flanking.
It should give a to-hit bonus, but advantage/disadvantage are retarded because they square the probabilities. 5th ed is bad.
>>
>>3692795
>>3692835
flanking still works for sneak attack
>>
>>3692838
>flanking still works for sneak attack
That is true, but it's "flanking" in the sense of "two allies engaging the same enemy" which triggers even from the front, while what was being discussed was a single combatant maneuvering to attack the rear or an enemy.
>>
>>3692846
imo front/rear/sides is kind of a silly distinction for what is after all a turn based board game



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.