>>1788343
System is tedious when used in more tactical scenarios, shines at a more strategic level
Ground war is fun, but works better for WWI than other wars
Naval is just bad. if they don't come up with a new system the upcoming pacific game will be a joke.
AI is surprisingly good compared to its peers
Too much scripting where the game just pops units onto the map or auto resolves something like the Norway invasions of wwii

>>1788343
didnt knew it existed and it looks like a panzer general remake. thats fine if you like that, i dont personally in current year when war in the east style games exist but it must have an appeal for people that want a strategy sp experience but simplified.

>>1788939
to conclude my worthless opninion since i didnt played it... if i wanted a simplified fast strategy game i would play advance wars or fire emblem that at least it has cute aesthetics and its basically the same (but better)