[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now being accepted. Apply here.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: BattleAcesSGF2024-3.jpg (247 KB, 1920x1080)
247 KB
247 KB JPG
New beta is up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTSqo2JR_C8
>>
>warpath system
>war credits
>daily contracts
It's pay2win bullshit, huh. Maybe I'll try it once out of beta, because very short, very fast and very simple compfag matches sound interesting.
>>
File: 1669253349931358.jpg (90 KB, 604x604)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>1890151
>what if we made a game that focuses entirely on the worst aspects of the RTS genre
>>
>>1890233
Really just making restaurants-computer videogaming centers south korean style, instead of making shitty cheap RTS after cheap RTS, was the right decision all along.
>>
It’s pretty fun, but needs more units.
>>
>>1890233
that's the entire rts genre since forged alliance
>>
>>1890151
It looks fun but they need to tone down the p2w shit. Getting destroyed by something you don't have a real counter to must fucking suck
>>
>>1890794
I didn't know forged alliance got rid of basebuilding and focused on split second perfect gookclick micro decisions...
>>
Does progress carry over from the beta?
>>
>>1890151
>no nigger portraits and all the girls are cute
this gets a standing ovation from me
>>
>>1891421
what girls? The game is about uninspired bulbous mobile chink unit designs with 0 personality or soul with plenty of weak ass pew pew pew effects
>>
>>1891657
>what girls?
it's a minute long video man, wouldn't have killed you to watch it before you replied to the thread
>>
>>1891854
I watched the video, there are no girls in the game just user portraits
>>
>>1891892
yes? and i said i was talking about the portraits in my post. not only did you not watch the video, you didn't even read the post you responded to. that's fucking grim man
>>
Got a key after the beta started, and yep my feeling was correct >>1890951
It's fun until you have 5 matches against a strategy you don't have a counter to because the unit costs 60 000 dollarydoos to unlock

>>1890233
>playing the game is the worst part of RTS
>>
game is a lot of fun
but im trying to avoid playing it so they dont think people will put up with their shitty monetization
>>
>>1891657
>0 personality or soul
dogshit taste
crabs/kingcrabs/scorpions/bombers are all top tier design
>>
>>1892228
>crabs/kingcrabs/scorpions/bombers are all top tier design
maybe if your pronouns are they/them lmao. You wouldn't know top tier design if it raped you in your rotten axewound
>>
>>1891657
>>1892272
Spotted the dude that didn't play the game, all the voice lines are fun to hear and one of the things the game gets right.
If your going to complain about something, I think the MTX design should be the thing that's scrutinized the most. Let alone that it kinda is a neutered experience compared to almost any other rts in existence.
>>
>>1893189
>all the voice lines are fun to hear and one of the things the game gets right
too bad the gameplay is dogshit and the game is ugly as sin
>I think the MTX design should be the thing that's scrutinized the most
its just another nail in the coffin. If you want MTX in your game, the game needs to be good and attract players first. But this gook retard in charge begins by shoving an invoice in your face when the game isnt even fully out yet, it deserves to die and go bankrupt out of principle.
Retards behind Homeworld 3 also thought they could sell MTX, they lost their jobs instead lmao
>>
File: 1715663541814640.png (507 KB, 1076x626)
507 KB
507 KB PNG
>>1893393
>too bad the gameplay is dogshit and the game is ugly as sin
Gameplay honestly not bad bro. It's mid at worse, but it's honestly perfect for getting friends who don't typically play rts into the genre.
I personally have been playing this with a friend and it's simple enough for him to get the idea of what he's been missing. I'll see if I can play something else with him like bar.
>But this gook retard in charge begins by shoving an invoice in your face when the game isnt even fully out yet, it deserves to die and go bankrupt out of principle.
I really fucking hate battlepasses, and I hope to god they cool off with that shit.
They better just do a sc2 and make it mostly cosmetic shit. I don't think the average rts player is willing to put up with that.
I can easily go and play bar, halo wars, Dow1, and aoe to name a few instead if I want to play a competitive rts. Let alone the new shit were getting a ton that hopefully won't suck ass.
>Retards behind Homeworld 3 also thought they could sell MTX, they lost their jobs instead lmao
God dam what a mess. I have kharak so that's a def next for me, and i'll play cataclysm later probably. Heard good things bout both.
>>
>>1890151
>want to play
>bother to get a code from a streamer
>website craps out and code gets used/was already used
>don't want to ask for another code
And that's how I lost interest in trying to play Battle Aces.
>>
>>1895849
you dont have to be so tsundere anon
7C7YWZM7JA51VSZU6KX4NVU7WD44PJN3



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.