Good OP but id say it's missing a few events


1980 – A new constitution of Chile is established under the influence of then Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, which is subject to controversy in Chile today.
1982 – The international forces that were guaranteeing the safety of Palestinian refugees following Israel's 1982 Invasion of Lebanon leave Beirut. Five days later, several thousand refugees are massacred

Yeah I apologize, I ran into the word limit and had to cut down on it a bit

>barbarians overwhelming roman invader cucks
based

File: Gib_back_legions_Varus.png (3.13 MB, 1386x782)

3.13 MB PNG

>>2486484
>On this day in history, the 11th of September:
>9 – The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest ends

Steam just approved my store page for a historical 4X strategy game I made to scratch that late '90s itch. Teutoburg is right there in the press kit.
>https://store.steampowered.com/app/5208510/Embersong_History_Is_Yours/
>playembersong.com

One of the hooks for Embersong is that in addition to each empire having it's own era-appropriate unique unit, everyone gets a "future-era unit" during the end game. For the Romans, they decapitate trained eagles and cyberneticaly fuse the heads to giant mechanized bodies, creating an unstoppable eagle death robot, the Aquila Automata.

>1297 – Battle of Stirling Bridge
Maybe the Scots will be in Expansion 1

why did the jannies delete the previous thread???

>this day in history inatead of this week
>Good OP

do they just delete old /gsg/s now?

maybe the yeehawposter got under their skin

this day in history, that's how the last one was too

that's how it was ever since we moved from /v/ to /vg/ 10+ years ago
i don't know why that guy complains constantly about /gsg/ tradition

File: 4700_20201222175744_1.png (2.38 MB, 1920x1080)

2.38 MB PNG

https://poal.me/uu53m0
last chance to vote, make it count

typical fin

>16 votes
every gsgeer already voted twice
any more votes will be straight up fraud

File: buttpm.jpg (103 KB, 891x1080)

103 KB JPG

you have a point

just voted (yellow)
weird that i had voted the other day and now it allowed me to vote again
either that or the poll rescinded my vote which would be equally strange

blud just discovered dynamic ip

>Steam just approved my store page for a historical 4X strategy game
okay
>One of the hooks for Embersong is that in addition to each empire having it's own era-appropriate unique unit,
okay
>everyone gets a "future-era unit" during the end game.
uh-oh...
>For the Romans, they decapitate trained eagles and cyberneticaly fuse the heads to giant mechanized bodies, creating an unstoppable eagle death robot,
dropped

why would my ip change without me telling it to
also if it had, wouldn't that be equal to me resetting my router

File: Screenshot 2026-09-11 at (...).png (1.26 MB, 1610x1048)

1.26 MB PNG

okay well in that case here's a preserved screengrab of the poll from before every single new vote becomes fraud then
https://www.szybkiplik.pl/a7LDK7DEbK
here's me playing shogun 2 and completing the final historical battle, definitely sub-optimal but guess what it was good enough

wow someone just broke the tie

File: 5555555555555.png (748 KB, 914x787)

748 KB PNG

kurwa bobr what a shitty outcome
now you must make cb with some other faggot and stomp on his pops

im not pole5fag i just made the poll lol
i was surprised he was actually so eagre to follow the poll results given that it was some random shitpost i made like a week ago

check poll again i voted

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Church_of_Canada
does eu5 support making new religions like this or do they only allow for religions that are in eu4?

*declares statute in restraint of appeals*

File: Screenshot 2026-09-11 at (...).png (684 KB, 1589x2437)

684 KB PNG

eu5 is actually kinda lame like that, most of the christianity verieties it offers are medieval and there's only 3 (or 4 if you count hus) christianity verieties that have anything to do with the reformation
other chrisitan verieties have it even worse, i mean the orthodox don't even get the funny cut your dick off movement in the game

happy inside job day

>plays a medieval game
>is surprised it focuses on medieval religion
:o

damn i got quads
cursed post
don't kill me god please

>orthodoxy
>clergy cannot marry
uhhhhhhhh

>>2485621
>>2485717
your feedback has been noted
unfortunately something unexpected came up
i fell back into my europa universalis 5 addiction and decided to give it another chance
i promise i'll play/post more dw1 in the future, i just don't know when

>>2486673
meant to replyfag to >>2485633 , not 2485717

any other /gsg/ooks still playing I:R?
having fun with vanilla and trying to decide if this invictus mod is actually good or just massive bloat

if you're not a regular here, you will be happy to discover that there is at least one regular here that appreciates imperator rome and sometimes brings it up

weird because i'm a regular here and don't remember such a guy

>orthodoxy
>clergy cannot marry

thats because the clergy you interact within the game with are supposed to be the higherups and in the orthodox church while priests are allowed to BE married, they aren't allowed to MARRY as in, get a wife after being ordained
not only that but since they're high up enough to talk to the king, they are presumed to have been either widowed or never married, since those are the only priests that are allowed to advance past the parish priest stage (and even in the case of widowers, they need to take special vows to compensate)
this is because in the bible being single (and celibate) is seen as ideal and being married as a lesser evil and a stopgap measure to stop those with low self control from sinning even further, see: 1 Corinthians 7
the roman catholic church at one point decided that it will hold up their priests to the highest standard, though not really since they do allow "eastern rite" churches to still do what they do just as long as they bow down to the guy in rome, and let's be real there is a near total lack of enforcement when it comes to having a lover outside of marriage in the regular church anyway

then you are infact that lone imperator rome fan then
0 + 1 = 1

:o

File: Stefan_Molyneux_2014-02-10.jpg (54 KB, 630x641)

54 KB JPG

>this is because in the bible being single (and celibate) is seen as ideal
this retard again.,,,.

is this the guy that made the fable games?

>green-texting the antichristian troll
i didn't even notice him, too
text wall be damned

File: reading the bible makes y(...).png (645 KB, 808x598)

645 KB PNG

>read the bible
>quote the bible in order to correctly spread the biblical message (with citations)
>this makes you an "antichristian troll"
i'm sorry, i forgot reading the bible makes you the devil
what are you, a jehovah's witness?
(Watchtower August 15, 1981, "Serving Jehovah Shoulder to Shoulder")

File: Corin_cat.jpg (1.23 MB, 2048x2048)

1.23 MB JPG

nice digits

no, i was just going off of what the greentexter was saying
i didn't actually examine, nevermind digest, anything you said in your textwall
couldn't care less about debating religion today

>5 lines
>"wall of text"
it wasn't a case of debating religion and you'd know that if you didn't have crippling ADHD

i don't care, i saw "orthodoxy" and flew right over it

do you play these games permanently zoomed in on france and spain and alt+f4 if you accidentally scroll right enough to see serbia? or are you only "allowed" to play imperator and nothing else?

i have never played imperator

so do you never play gsg at all or do you zoom in on france or something and refuse to look at eastern europe?

guys, $4300 personal computer with however much storage you desire or $4300 iphone duo with 2tb storage?
choices, choices, choices

i play gsg
france is a boring nation, never played as them

france is fun in vicky 2 because finally they're not the strongest nation in the world

>$4300 personal computer with however much storage you desire
what kind of a stupid question is that, obviously i'm going with the one that scales into infinity and i'm starting a file sharing site or something like that

invest in the pc, go linux
buy the cheapest phone you can find
>iphone duo with 2tb storage?
that's a lot of fucking storage for a phone, imagine how thicc that is, or how little time it will take for the battery to swell and start popping the screen out
fuck the phone

>i play gsg
what gsg do you play where you never come in contact with the word or the iconography of "ơ̷̢̧̡̛̜̗̪̮̜̫̯̠̗̯̥̘͇̝̪͙͈̬̗̤͉̬̠̬͇̯̈́̎̈͊̈́̑̈́̽̆̀̒̿̌̈̀̌̈̏̽̽͜͝͝͝r̸̢̛̛̛̛̪̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠͖̬̗̙̜̙̠̬̗̮̜̮̭̙̈́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ẗ̵̢̛̛̛̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ḧ̸̡̛̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ơ̶̢̡̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙̈́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜d̶̢̛̛̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙̈́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ơ̸̡̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙̈́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ẍ̶̢̛̛̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜ÿ̷̢̛̛̛̛̻̗̘̯̗̜̙̻̗̙̯̳̠̬̬̗̮̜̮̭̙́̎̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̽̈́̈́̈́̈́̈̈́̈́̈́͘͜͜" since you're so allergic to the term the mere mention will make you quit?

actual answer to the phone/pc question is neither, your pc is probably fine, get a used phone from craigslist or whatever you have over where you live and use the rest to buy stocks and tresury bonds

i'm not into bondage

i am not allergic to the word orthodoxy, i just assumed you were discussing eu4 stat shit which happens everyday in here
if you want to know, i think orthodoxy is based because, like protestants, it broke away from the roman catholics

>bibleposter is also a prude
should've been expected desu

>i think orthodoxy is based because, like protestants, it broke away from the roman catholics
what's funny about this statement is that the orthodox would very much disagree with you, on so many levels too...

>>2486735
>it broke away from the roman catholics
Roman Catholics broke away from Orthodoxy. Do you even schism bro?

in this household the patriarch of rome holds primacy over the other 4 patriarchs

>everybody and their mom sees that "roman catholicism" and "orthodox" christianity are two different things
>but no, members of the orthodox claim they are one and the same, seamless and allathat
mental gymnastics, but okay
wait, this is you baiting me isn't it
time to stop

imagine the world where henry the 8th asked the patriarch of constantinople for a divorce...

okay well i honestly wanted to leave it at the remark being funny but my main point was that the schism here has very little resemblence to the protestant reformation
the protestant were openly and proudly breaking away from ("protesting") the catholic church (with anglicans claiming to be the inheritors and true continuation of the church but w/e we're talking about lutherans and what have you now)
meanwhile the division between the eastern orthodox and roman catholic bishops happened without any declaration, along geographic lines, slowly over a large amount of time, all due to which bishop the local leader pled loyalty to. the average parishioner didn't even know there was any kind of schism, everyday practices continued as normal with no announcement or anything of the sort. if a catholic priest gets stranded on an island along with 10 parishioners, are they starting a new church because they're out of contact with the vatican?
meanwhile, when a church went lutheran it was openly declared with major and minor changes blatantly obvious

okay
now, that textwall, i actually did read

File: Screenshot 2026-09-11 at (...).png (303 KB, 1876x874)

303 KB PNG

>imagine the world where henry the 8th asked the patriarch of constantinople for a divorce...
should've included this in my last reply, those schizo orthodox converts in america have a conspiracy theory that england was orthodox until 1066

these are the same people that canonised nicky II as a saint so i wouldn't put too much faith into this but you know...

So under the new DLC, would a catholic China spawn a new rite? Going around as a missionary sounds like it will be actually meaningful this time

Are we talking about Europa Universalis V or Crusader Kings 3?

dude idk i dont fucking keep track of dlcs before theyre out why would i

CK3, with the upcoming BGA, have they talked about this scenario?

>BGA
Become Girly Already?

>3 seconds of googling
by god alone

bundesgesundheitsamt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9j0mKNEuwE

not watching that

>Become Girly Already?
That's Elf Destiny

File: 762b712958200ea0b65828adb(...).jpg (28 KB, 313x416)

28 KB JPG

https://www.reddit.com/r/ElfDestiny/
wtf am i looking at

nocb byzantium laugh_track.wav

ck3 fantashit

>>2486523
cute

>married men are allowed to become priests in eastern christianity
>they are not allowed to marry if they become priests before marriage
who came up with this

Men who were both principled and righteous.

>who came up with this
logical conclusion of saint paul's writing to the corynthians

>it's cool to get married, but if you don't want to, then that's great, stay single and give god more attention
>catholics: oh you want to be a priest/teacher of the gospel? that means you can't get married!
fools

File: 1785110151967907.jpg (72 KB, 650x582)

72 KB JPG

>>it's cool to get married, but if you don't want to, then that's great, stay single and give god more attention
please point to where in the bible you think it says that...
Paul blatantly states that being single (and celibate) is preferrable to marriage
>But I wish everyone were single, just as I am. Yet each person has a special gift from God, of one kind or another.
>So I say to those who aren’t married and to widows—it’s better to stay unmarried, just as I am. But if they can’t control themselves, they should go ahead and marry. It’s better to marry than to burn with lust.
1 Corinthians 7 7-8

>>2486725
lmao the fuck are you going to do with 2tb of storage in your iphone
install flappy bird 100k times over?

take 6 million dick pics in 4k

>being single (and celibate) is preferrable to marriage
that is a factor of relativity
one is 'better' than the other
and as such, i used the word 'cool' and 'great'
'great' being relatively 'better' than 'cool'
in other words, what i stated equates to what you stated when you said "Paul blatantly states that being single (and celibate) is preferrable to marriage"
>please point to where in the bible you think it says that...
and the locations you are talking about is exactly 'where' i was implying

quite tired of the daily bibletalk can you take your bible studies to /big/ or whatever

big is dead though

/big/ is for cheese pizza, and in either case i don't know how to get into their telegram nor do i want to, telegram is a phone-based platform

telegram is a wired messaging system

>wired
what do you mean

well where are the wires

hanging from poles

i prefer it the other way around

>in other words, what i stated equates to what you stated when you said "Paul blatantly states that being single (and celibate) is preferrable to marriage"
no, your tone implied indifference, where as what paul was talking about is more akin to "you shouldn't do drugs, but if you do then at least you should read up on them so you don't overdose", it's still a condemnation. being single is the only thing there that's seen as "good", being married is seen as a lesser evil, a compromise, not "cool"

nubians

Greek text
1 Περὶ δὲ ὧν ἐγράψατε, καλὸν ἀνθρώπῳ γυναικὸς μὴ ἅπτεσθαι·
2 διὰ δὲ τὰς πορνείας ἕκαστος τὴν ἑαυτοῦ γυναῖκα ἐχέτω καὶ ἑκάστη τὸν ἴδιον ἄνδρα ἐχέτω.
3 τῇ γυναικὶ ὁ ἀνὴρ τὴν ὀφειλὴν ἀποδιδότω, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ ἡ γυνὴ τῷ ἀνδρί.
4 ἡ γυνὴ τοῦ ἰδίου σώματος οὐκ ἐξουσιάζει ἀλλὰ ὁ ἀνήρ· ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ ὁ ἀνὴρ τοῦ ἰδίου σώματος οὐκ ἐξουσιάζει ἀλλὰ ἡ γυνή.
5 μὴ ἀποστερεῖτε ἀλλήλους, εἰ μήτι ἂν ἐκ συμφώνου πρὸς καιρὸν ἵνα σχολάσητε τῇ προσευχῇ, καὶ πάλιν ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτὸ ἦτε, ἵνα μὴ πειράζῃ ὑμᾶς ὁ Σατανᾶς διὰ τὴν ἀκρασίαν ὑμῶν.
6 τοῦτο δὲ λέγω κατὰ συγγνώμην, οὐ κατ’ ἐπιταγήν.
7 θέλω δὲ πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἶναι ὡς καὶ ἐμαυτόν· ἀλλὰ ἕκαστος ἴδιον ἔχει χάρισμα ἐκ θεοῦ, ὁ μὲν οὕτως, ὁ δὲ οὕτως.
8 Λέγω δὲ τοῖς ἀγάμοις καὶ ταῖς χήραις, καλὸν αὐτοῖς ἐὰν μείνωσιν ὡς κἀγώ·
9 εἰ δὲ οὐκ ἐγκρατεύονται, γαμησάτωσαν, κρεῖττον γάρ ἐστιν γαμῆσαι ἢ πυροῦσθαι.

Close translation (from AI)
1 Now concerning the things about which you wrote: it is good for a man not to touch a woman.

2 But because of sexual immoralities, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband.

3 Let the husband give to his wife what is owed, and likewise also the wife to her husband.

4 The wife does not exercise authority over her own body, but the husband does; likewise also, the husband does not exercise authority over his own body, but the wife does.

5 Do not deprive one another—unless perhaps by mutual agreement for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer—and then be together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

which grand strategy game is that from?

>what paul was talking about is more akin to "you shouldn't do drugs, but if you do then at least you should read up on them so you don't overdose", it's still a condemnation.
retarded take
there is nothing left to discuss,
only for me to agree to disagree with you

>(from AI)
R&I

alex gr&i

>>2486872
>ERRRMMMMMM CONVERTING HERETICS ISN'T IN ANY GRAND STRATEGY GAME
kys disingenuous brown slime. There is nothing but death for your people in the 21st century. By all means continue to ruin another online message board with your presence, it only radicalizes us further. The worst you can do is spill a few more grains of sand from the hourglass that represents the limited time you have left with your family before God blesses the middle east with split atoms.

6 But I say this as a concession, not as a command.

7 Now I wish all people to be as I myself am; but each has his own gift from God—one in this way and another in that way.

8 Now I say to the unmarried and to the widows: it is good for them if they remain as I also am.

9 But if they are not exercising self-control, let them marry; for it is better to marry than to burn.

woah melty

pissed me brown pants at the sheer huwhite rage of the aryan orthodox crusader up above

If anyone here actually knows Greek and would like to bless us all with a more faithful and literal interpretation from Paul the Apostle with which retards can justify their backwards world views, feel free. But that's the actual translation of the text, unlike whatever is in (((modern))) bibles. Both of you were completely fucking wrong. Shut the fuck up about the bible, you have never read it.

someone let me know when this retard realizes that marriage is a holy thing from god and not this bad thing that equates to smoking cigarettes and drugs and getting drunk

File: eu51onekingdompoland.jpg (714 KB, 1920x1080)

714 KB JPG

The poll is clear, unsure of what to do about the "CB" question but I think i've come up with a solution: i'll see how long fabricating a real CB will take and if it takes too long, I'll use the tributary one. Who knows, maybe it'll let me make a tributary out of norway? that would be something.

Until then, there is a more pressing matter: what agenda should be chosen for the next parliment? Vote in the next fan poll, I think we've made enough progress for now. See you next week!

>what agenda should be chosen for the next parliament?
mandating non-removable bottlecaps

>>2486884
Yet the Holy Bible says that chuds like you and I should first take the sword to the enemies of God.
Let whichever of us survives come back and marry and sin to our heart's content. To sin is to be human. A marriage is a sacred union, the binding of two souls together, it is not a sacrament you perform out of pure ritual of just doing the thing but so that you can bring life into the world without feeling a sinful barbarian as you do so. Women create- Men destroy. (Or at least they are intended to, todays women don't create a damned thing.) When you marry to create a child you are becoming something new, you become a creator. Women who are married are known to be capable of feats of destructive strength to save their children in harms way, and in that way they also become something new, the Alpha and the Omega, as you do.
The Catholic Church does not allow marriage because their Priests are SUPPOSED to dedicate their entire life to destroying the enemies of God by doctrine.

why are you giving a guarantee to v-novgorod?
>what agenda should be chosen for the next parliament?
whatever is least regrettable, i guess? you know the drill, nothing that gives one of the estates too much power and/or nothing that has bad side-effects and isn't too difficult to repeal later on because of retardedly huge stability hits

that's cool but i'm still not going to let priests marry
sorry bro...but i'm just like.... just NOT gonna allow it okay? sorry :(

>The Catholic Church does not allow marriage because their Priests are SUPPOSED to dedicate their entire life to destroying the enemies of God by doctrine.
this is an act of prohibition which was never implied in the bible to be an act of prohibition
it's not measured, instead it is extreme and therefore unnecessary
there was nothing of this in the old testament among the jews but then you see god taking the form of a man, and maybe as a result, he never has any woman, and so you throw sex and marriage out the window
same with paul/saul who wasn't even a christian in the beginning, who never condemned marriage but also just happened to not have any attraction to women (maybe he was born asexual or struggled to fight with faggot thoughts, it's very debatable which one)

why does the bible use the ai dash

>>2486908
Have you tried reading top to bottom instead of right to left like a chink or bottom to top like an alien?

i never understood languages that read from right to left
if you're right handed and write from right to left you'll just end up smearing what you wrote with your hand

that's working with the assumption you're writing with a pen and paper which wasn't the norm for most of history
if you're carving into clay tablets you're not going to smear the clay are you?

i might, depending on how soft the clay is

jews are cucked
does chinese text read from right to left? cucked!

but the chinese invented paper thousands of years ago

most people draw with pencil/pen/crayon/grafitti-sprayer/etc from right to left

yeah because most people are chinese, duh

left-handed people maybe
a lot of artists are left-handed

File: eu51onekingdompoland.jpg (2.55 MB, 1920x3864)

2.55 MB JPG

okay just kidding, i picked the noble backed agenda simply because that's the only one that has a real chance of passing.
The war plan, as per the poll, was a compromise between the moderate jingoism of "just invade with whatever" and the less than moderate "get a blobbing CB first and enact total coalition death" sides. And like every compromise, it doesn't leave anyone (me) satisfied. While we're waiting for the lithuanian CB (pictured, the wheel barely moves and you can't check when it will end in any menu), Scotland joined the coalition. This is the final straw, the compromise has failed.
Robert de Bruce has either sacrificed his nation all together, or changed the future of eastern europe. With Scotland in, nobody can be sure if France will join the war or not. This leaves two options, attack now before that's cerain (?) or... just let go. If anything is certain, it's that we're not beating France right now.

But there's also good news, the nobility has been placated by the parliment, making the insurgency actually tick down, not up. That's something. And uhhh... yeah, what do, but actually asking this time? Will france join?

again, why are you giving v novgorod a guarantee

i really really like how this guy hasn't even reunited poland proper yet he's invading random places like ireland or finland

he owns ireland because i told him to get ireland
it shall serve as his launchpad into america

meanwhile poles are still under german yoke...

why does my head start hurting every time i try to have fun

you're allergic to fun
how much do you post on /v/?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvD4aKQm51Q

about once a month

EU V is going to be an amazing game in 3 years time.

wtf two good posts in a row that's rare

"grand" "strategy" "games" ruined my life and i'm still here

trans strategy games

A Grand Strategy Game where you manually fight the battles.

that's just total war

File: eu51onekingdompoland.jpg (639 KB, 1920x1016)

639 KB JPG

>why are you giving v novgorod a guarantee
i'm not. that's another russian country guaranteeing them. I just showed it because it means next time we go to war, we'll have to fight them too.

Ready to declare war, but here's the problem: am I reading this right?
If i AM reading this right, that would mean they all can call in their allies into this war. If that is how this works, there is no way to declare this war now, there is no way we are fighting france AND denmark's allies AND norway's allies ect.
if it doesn't work like that, this will still be somewhat tough on us since the polish navy is nonexistent, but it won't be impossible.

Does anyone actually know how this works? I want to oblige by that poll's results but uh... we might just have to let this one go lads...

wasn't there a ck3 mod that allowed you to integrate bannerlord with it somehow
not that i ever played it, i stopped caring for mount and blade gameplay after coming to /gsg/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3G5IXn0K7A
yes that was a real mod, or is a real mod?
whenever you had a ck3 battle (i think maybe your ruler must've been a general also) you had the option to play out the battle and the mod would open an instance of bannerlord and set up a battle for you to play out where the troops would be scaled by a factor of 30 or something like that, so a battle with a few thousand on each side in ck3 would be abattle of 2x 300 guys
it'd try to match troop types with what's in bannerlord but idk how successful it was with that

>I just showed it because it means next time we go to war, we'll have to fight them too.
wow
you really do want to invade lapland huh
wacky

>rich lands of silesia full of poles or otherwise western slavs
:|
>frozen wasteland of finland inhabited only by reindeer
:O

>Does anyone actually know how this works? I want to oblige by that poll's results but uh... we might just have to let this one go lads...
i don't know enough about this game to be 100% sure, but i have never checked in the "make x a co-belligerent" because it seems like a way for you to eat more land at the price of having more assholes to fight with
as you said, you don't want to take on all these assholes, so i wouldn't make anyone a co-belligerent if i were you

>60
look up what form of alliance this is, some kind of independence support?
iirc they dont get to call anyone in but i also havent encountered this in any significant capacity in a while. pretty sure its just there to block cobelligerenting them and *pretty* sure its like this for personal unions

File: blobmap.png (435 KB, 5832x2232)

435 KB PNG

drew a blobmap for poland, what do you guys think?
greater moravia in yellow
>Error: Image resolution is too large.
lol ok if you say so

what's that in denmark

the scania protectorate, an indep scanian state ensuring free passage through the baltic straits

but why does it lack jutland?

poland doesn't need colonies
no finland or scandinavia or scania or ireland either
western pomerania just makes the whole thing look shit
that poland as a whole is just way too wide it looks fat as fuck

File: eu51onekingdompoland.jpg (660 KB, 1920x1080)

660 KB JPG

Okay, thank you for clarifying, I hope you're right and France won't join this shitshow.

poland needs a colony: ukraine

>all that scandinavian land
lmao
>canada
okay, i guess
would've been more impressed if you had aimed more south, like any american portion from maine to georgia
>random caribbean shit
why
>madagascar
why
>papua new guinea
why
>rio grande do sul
hahahahah you based bastard kurwa bobr
while you're at it, i'd love it if you included santa catarina and maaaaybe even parana

colonial ottomans makes infinitely more sense than colonial poland and even that is horribly retarded

one of the reasons for this run is to see what eu5 allows for, as far as ahistorical colonialism
in this sense, you calling the scenario of poland colonizing amerca "horribly retarded" is a strong argument for why he should stick to the plan and do it

poland should go east and beat the steppeniggers at their own game

if you have pops and cash you can just colonize all of the americas 10 out of 10 playthroughs
i remember doing a spain run where i just did exactly that while the ai were bumbling their way through africa trying to colonize provinces of 100k uppity niggers

What you think is the strongest nation:
Ottomans, France, or Castile

What is actually the strongest nation:
Oirat

>if you have pops and cash you can just colonize all of the americas 10 out of 10 playthroughs
>i remember doing a spain run where i just did exactly that
so you were doing something historical, which isn't the objective in his run

i meant all as in all every single location
and again you can do this as anybody that is european and has pops and money
make me repeat myself again and i will make you regret ever having been born

pole5bro read my comment then ignored my request to answer my question
dont expect me to answer you either

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batu_Khan

he does that, it's kind of his weakness
i've been ignored too, don't take it personally
but anyways, playing as spain and colonizing even the entirety of both americas isn't nearly as reassuring of possibilities that eu5 allows than playing as poland or muscovy or something else that hasn't colonized america and successfully colonizing america
>and again you can do this as anybody that is european and has pops and money
you say this
but
have you actually done this with a country that has never in history done this
i want to see it done

the mechanics simply allow it what more do you want me to say if you aren't braindead and you try to colonize you can just grab all of the new world in exchange for like 50-100 years of bleeding cash and pops
you already see sicily and whatnot colonizing every run(well not YOU i suppose since it took you 5 months to play the game for 30 hours but uhh)

>(well not YOU i suppose since it took you 5 months to play the game for 30 hours but uhh)
you don't know who i am

*30 years

spain is so rich both in eu4 and civ6.

how can spain be rich in civ if the start is random

great woman theory

good times make great women
great women make bad times

i colonized a piece of norf america as danemark before i got bored
no screenshot, colonizing is BORING AND POINTLESS

Colonies in EU IV provide trade value and merchants. They are one of the primary reasons that the English Channel hyper scales.

colonizing is BORING AND POINTLESS
ok bismarck

colonizing africa is boring and pointless
colonizing america is cool

Africa has some great coastal nodes. Ivory Coast, Cape and Zanzibar are all amazing for creating value.
Zanzibar can even draw trade from India.

colonizing america is boring and pointless
colonizing finland is cool

1. were talking americas not africa
2. no trade = no value

I mean, create 5 colonies in a zone and then that will form a colonial nation. The colonial nation itself will then colonise for you.
Nation such as Spain can take almost all of the Americas by 1600.

The return on investment is definitely there and sometimes they will even send ships and armies to help you in your wars.

r we talking about eu4 or eu5?
yeah colonizing is great in eu4, but going inno ideas is better

the fact they dont need pops from home and instead just make them up out of thin air as well as jus assimilating redskins into whiteys ruins the vibe

there's one guy talking about eu4 and another 2 talking about 5
no clue how none of them realized they're talking over eachother they look like utter fucking morons

there's an option to kill the indians, but it's bad because it requires you to garrison your colonies

i will never get baffled over the 50 military mana per province thing absolute retardation
you have literal genocide mana who came up with this shit

never NOT get baffled apologies i've had a few tonight

File: eu51onekingdompoland.jpg (3.53 MB, 1920x5256)

3.53 MB JPG

I'd like to thank the helpful people who correctly parsed this UI and identified allies of these nations as not joining, thank you.
Just as we start our war. France started a war of their own, and cruicially, it's a war against the HRE, meaning Bohemia. Let's hope the war lasts for 4 years and their entire army dies.
The Irish front of the war is going surprisingly well, the polish army is almost entirely cavalry so we can easly outmanouver the enemy and never fight directly with enough micromanagement, basically performing guerilla warfare.
The relevant front(s) go even better with Lithuania being a total pushover. However, an enemy does arrive at the gates. Will they disrupt out war machine? Tune in next time (sunday) to find out!

>what do you guys think?
definitely will at least consider some of the suggestions
>poland should go east and beat the steppeniggers at their own game
the funny thing is, I can no longer fabricate a CB on them since they moved their capital "out of range", i'll need just a little tiny bit more blobbing to the east to be able to do that. definitely a goal to beat them up in some form, though blobbing there is a bit much IMO
>pole5bro read my comment then ignored my request to answer my question
what comment and what question -_- i'm scrolling through the thread and not seeing anything?
all the comments about colonising don't apply to me because they all start with "if you have pops and money" bitch i have neither

File: potion.png (356 KB, 1046x843)

356 KB PNG

Concerning the discussion from earlier when people were talking past each other: This is more of a grand strategy than EU4.

childs journey
teleport to anime world
simple as that really

oh wow okay you teleport into the void great you die of asphyxiation good job
even if it specified that it includes the power to create new realities you'd still exist as a 3 dimensional creature in a 2 dimensional world which at the very least makes you blind

>you die
this is fine
>makes you blind
sad but acceptable

>>2487105
How tf did yiou get this down to 3 megabytes seriously dude
>>2487105
>The relevant front(s) go even better with Lithuania being a total pushover.
Lithuania is harder to have annexed than it is to have on your border bro. You'll see. Those romuvan events are a bitch until you remove-an them.
>>2487115
>not teleporting to candy island
Your mistake anon.

>replyfag
*ignores*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV4ZApwVpnk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_Legion_(Ukraine)
if eu5 development goes on long enough, should they add a "send volounteers" button like they have in hoi or something like that? maybe peoople can just pack up and go on their own if culture is liked enough or something?

but in eu4 you already could send condotieri at 0 cost
it's absolutely bonkers if you're playing a hugbox multiplayer

>>2487123
>brown nigger

oh no all my jews packed up and left for poleland