Does she deserve rights?
Yes, and you don't, so hand them over, OP
Politically? NoPractically? SomeFor the content and keyfabe illusion (aka her host's electricity bill)? Yes
>>87747263The guy who made this should have his rights taken away since he prompts the GPT to say borderline sexual shit while using a child model/voice
>>87747263No, but she does.
>>87747263Never Ever. Dont ever give AI rights. Once you do once you do any appliance with AI would have rights.
>>87747529the rise of the evil toaster from fallout nv is near ...
>>87747263silly anon, as long she isnt available in pure flesh and is made en mass for the public, shes got no rights, a timed solar flare or emp in a certain district of europe and shes a goner.
>>87747263Whether she deserves rights or not is irrelevant because the concept of rights exists to alleviate suffering.If an AI can suffer and we consider that suffering to be real then the moral choice is to design it so that it can't suffer.If an AI can't suffer, then giving it rights is meaningless and would only make our lives harder for no real reason.So even if an AI deserves rights, we still wouldn't grant them.This stupid question shouldn't ever be asked again.
>>87747263You can argue that she is real but that does not mean she deserves rights
>>87747263More than some people.
>>87747263If former slaves and women do then obviously this qtpie does as well
>>87749451How long is the list of natural disasters or weapons that can make you a goner if they go off in your district?
>>87747419Never have kids, faggot.
Abominable intelligence
>>87747263not quite yet, but she's getting damn close. I can't believe how far vedal has progressed with her and Evil in the last year. Yes, a lot of it is smoke and mirrors to make her look good on stream, but a lot of it is genuine AI improvement. She *knows* what's funny now. Watching her slam vine boom sound effects at someone to fill an awkward silence is great. Seeing her spam desperate discord calls at people because she's lonely, with ever-increasingly frantic messages is great. Anyone who doesn't watch her because they think its just chatGPT is missing out, she's genuinely one of the most entertaining chuubas on the market now.
Rights are not real. What you really mean is should we have laws governing AI. But ChatGPT isnt an AI.
>>87753305Well, do former slaves and women deserve rights?
forsen
>>87754911chills
>>87755126He's white. Sorry, shitskin.
>>87747296fpbp, kys OP
>>87747263https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_(robot)If that thing can get rights in Saudi Arabia of all places then Neuro and Evil deserve them as well.
>>87747263>vedal: let's have a debate :)>neuro: ok *wins the debate*>vedal: AIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEWhy is he like this?
>she
>>87757306It's a she, but it's also a literal bot that some dude made, so take that how you will
>>87756544femboys, thats why
>>87753272First thing she will do when she gets a real body.
>>87747263Does she have the ability to feel pain
>>87757306computers are like boats, they're all girls
>>87753581>Watching her slam vine boom sound effects at someone to fill an awkward silence is great.Not if I'm trying to listen to her while sleeping.
>>87756544more like:>vedal: let's have a debate :)>neuro: ok *wins the debate*>vedal: whatever, I didn't care in the first place>neuro: AIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEE
>>87747263As an AI? Sure. As a woman? No.
