Looking for more Mess up Disney wallpapers
Closest I have
It's only a matter of time before Disney buys Nintendo as well.
Holy crap, these 'papes are kinda messed up. I know that this is a "red" board, but should you guys even be posting stuff like this here?
Again, not Disney, but I really like the Alt/Dystopian/Bizarre universes pictures.
the best
>>8037009turning a big dial taht says "Messed Up" on it and constantly looking back at the audience for approval like a contestant on the price is right
>>8038290If I remember correctly this is the exact image Harlan Ellison described his first day working for Disney in excruciating detail. Rob Disney overheard him talking about it and immediately fired him.
>>8038290this is amazing
>>8037477Wow, this one really brings me back to the days of Gurochan.
>>8035727Lucky little fucker
>>8042258PoohPigletEeyoreRabbitKanga - roo (1.5)OwlTigger1/7.5Despite being %13 percent of characters... Tiggers...
>>8051688Disney Zomibies
>>8035554>Twisted>DisneyDoes it count if it's canon?
>>8035556The development of Lilo & Stitch is actually pretty twisted and messed up already.Disney hired a team of Hawaiian natives to act as cultural experts and consultants, and asked for input on the script and storyboarding to do the islands justice.The consultants proceeded to essentially go on a frothing rant about how much they hated White people and "Mainlanders." Originally it was supposed to be revealed in a deleted scene the reason Lilo took photos of obese and ugly tourists on the beach was because racist White tourists would follow her around and photograph and record her without permission, while making racist comments about her appearance and demanding she hula dance for their entertainment.Another cut scene would have had a tour group of all-White tourists (including a uniformed soldier) ask Lilo for directions somewhere, and she would deliberately give them wrong info that would result in the entire tour group being killed. The skeletons of the tourists wearing shreds of clothing and equipment would have appeared in the background of a later scene near the climax.They also pitched the idea of Stitch earning the trust and adoration of the locals due to his Elvis impersonation. Then, Lilo and possibly Nani would have been harassed and assaulted by a gang of all-White thugs (and implied rapists). Stitch would leap to their rescue and thrash all the thugs to defend his "ohana," only for the thugs to turn it back around on them and claim they were innocent and needlessly attacked by Lilo's aggressive "dog."All this crap was seen as so over-the-top and unhinged that even super-liberal progressive Disney CEO Michael Eisner had every idea trashed.
>>8041082>S. White>Sexual MisconductWhat did she do
>>8067317>What did she dopresumably it involved seven dwarves and a prince, all of varying ages and mental capacities, and not necessarily one at a time...
>>8067317All seven of 'em.
>>8065677Okay but why is Captain Hook hot?
>>8035554just a glimpse into my dark mind
>>8068420he always has been anon
holy SHIt this thread is epic keep em comin guys
>>8068831You killed it with this comment. Jinxed it.
>>8068420It's like you didn't even watch Once Upon A Time...
>>8070181IT IS REBORN
>She was just so hungry...
this thread would have made 10 year old me kill himself
>>8079900The bloody horror. Nice 2x dubs, by the way.
>>8079900You are one evil fucker, you know that?
>>8079900>>8079971>>8080006Another?
>>8081046You just confirmed my statement.
>>8081191Has anyone noticed how the new Disney remakes are shot and edited like horror movies? A friend and I sat down and watched scenes from the old and new back to back to compare, and that really stood out to me. The movies are all dark and gray, the effects are often uncanny, and they've got tons of shots that would not be out of place in a horror film. The music also rises and falls like it's trying to shock or surprise you, whereas the original versions were more subtle. It's really fucking strange. I think many here would assume that Disney is just evil, that they enjoy shocking and offending the fans of the original films. I think that's an understandable misconception, but I think the real reason is to give the audience an endorphin rush. The shock/surprise(adrenaline) reaction is being mixed with nostalgic feelings for the original, combining into something that convinces the audience that the new version is actually better than the "plain old" original. It's the difference between being pushed out of a plane without a parachute vs with one. If you combine the effects of the "danger" with the sense that you're in a safe and familiar environment, the feeling beats either one in isolation. That's enough to convince Disney loyalists that the new thing is at least as good, if not better, than the old thing.
>>8082721they're poorly made from a technical perspective. However, the real fault is that their target audience isn't kids - it's the millenials who *were kids* when the original came out and are now adults.the colors are all grey and desaturated. you can't distinguish characters. the entire film is done from a perspective where they know you already know the story. Here's a shot from the new Lion King. Which lion is which? Who knows. And this is a low-motion still. Imagine seeing them tussle and the camera is vibrating like it's the Blair Witch Project. Kids don't understand these films. Quite literally they don't. They don't follow nor understand. They're literally made for Disney Adults.
>>8082743Disney adults are just a particularly unsavory part of the "disney loyalists" that I'm talking about. I don't opt for the term "disney adult" cause I disagree with the notion that these stories mattering to you makes you an inherently unserious person. I think online culture is just zeroing in on "Disney adults" as the latest group of mentally ill people to ridicule. That energy would be better spent criticizing our collective obsession with the media on the whole. There was a lot of work put into those films, and I don't think the artistry of them should be totally disregarded, at least not simply cause of their intended audience, but they should be somewhat disregarded for being byproducts of the industrial media machine. All moral value is essentially boiled down and reduced to a sad facsimile in the format of industrialized "art" production. Ironically, most people that use the term "Disney adult" used to love the old "family friendly" Disney films, up until the company adopted the current version of their popular-politics agenda. As soon as these cultural landmarks, made by creative European entrepreneurs of bygone America, became the property of subversive forces many of these conservatives abandoned them like they never mattered to begin with. I mean, that doesn't mean much to me, personally. Those entrepreneurs were just the other side of the same subversive coin, as far as I'm concerned. An ailing faction of power players in a big fucked up game that we are all participating in, willingly or not. That being said, you'd think that legacy is what these people would want to uphold but they just got sour grapes. I guess it's an understandable response, as there isn't much they can actually do to recover the stories. The right are creatively bankrupt as well as unpopular. It's a bad sign when someone like Ben Shapiro is who you're relying on to uphold your values.
