>>5611091
>>5611092
Is it true that theres really two manifestos? One edited by the government to make it read more traditional and right wing and another thats more anarchist and left wing, the original?
I wonder how he endured.. I want to pursue the same kind of life as he did (in Minecraft) but the loneliness would kill me even though being around people also makes me feel alone. https://youtu.be/Ro_YexdjPiY?si=eF0vbXb25mMuHcvx
>>5611136I want to live in the middle of nowhere. The absence of people doesnt bother me. The average person has very little for me to speak to about. Im trying to convince my girlfriend to move very very far away into the middle of nowhere with me, but shes resistant. Im not sure I can keep living in this insane system much longer. I want a family. Thats the main thing holding me back. If I could find a girl that wanted to homestead, that would be amazing. The GF says she wants to in one breath, and then in the next talks about normie consumerist stuff. She is definetly better than the average girl though, to her credit.
>>5611145>Has a gf.That is very based, good luck with trying to convince her.
>>5611091Do... do you want to fuck Ted?
>>5611092This video just proves that people choose to suffer.
>>5611091Good thread, long live Anarchism
>>5613783Op here.Rather I would say "Long live the Human Spirit." And if Anarchism is the system (or lack thereof) that best preserves that, then I'm an anarchist. As of now I remain agnostic about that. But we must recapture our humanity from this horrible golem enslaving us.
>>5611113Why would they make it more right wing?
>>5614573>why would they make it more right-wingBecause the government is right-wing, it relies on rightism (conservatism) to survive, and entryism of this kind is effective. Disseminating right-wing propaganda through the guise of revolutionary thought is an age old psyop to make uncooperative elements in society unknowingly work for the state instead of against it.
its a supreme irony seeing uncle ted get repackaged into a consumable commodity or fashion aesthetic and spread on an imageboard of all things
>>5614932Kinda ironic but also par for the course.
I've not ascribed to Teddyism since high school (I don't mean this a a dig suggesting you are immature) but it's always remained an interesting topic to me.One of the biggest revelations and reasons (admittedly mostly emotional and aesthetic) for rejecting the ideology to me was that in the wake of a breakdown of industrial society we (humans) would likely be one of only a few (if not THE only) megafauna to survive such a collapse. Most all of the extinctions of the larger more "noble" creatures on this planet happened before or early in the last century, with a human population orders of magnitude smaller and less voracious than our current one. Only through the relative 'luxury' of resources granted to us by rapidly burning through a hundred of million years of carbonized sunlight did conservation movements develop and set aside potentially productive land and creatures that exist in direct competition with us. My belief is that even a relatively rapid collapse of the system (5-20 years) would lead to the hunting and eventual extinction of most anything larger than a Pomeranian.The only way I could see most any megafauna (besides us) surviving such a scenario is if the event was pretty much instantaneous. I'm talking about the immediate destruction of 90%+ of the human race. It's much more grim than I can stand for both human and animal. I've always held hope that we could restore the natural world and live in harmony with it but have not heard much to convince me there is a real way to achieve this.
>>5614870Are you schizophrenic?Ted got sent letters in prison and he answered them back. He never claimed that there were multiple versions or a modified version. I don't why you try to gaslight yourself but this just shows that you know nothing about Ted and that you are just trying to push everything towards politics. You are just politics brained like many other leftists, because you assume things with no valid evidence and then spout it out loud with undeserved level of smugness.
>>5616168That's an interesting stance that I hadn't considered before. Our prehistoric ancestors were able to drive multiple megafauna species to extinction with a fraction of our population using only fire, sticks, and stones; it makes sense that we'd end up doing the same even quicker today.However, while the terrestrial realm would be ravaged until our population drops enough for it to start rebounding, I think the oceans would start recovering much quicker and would likely become a major food source for the remaining humans. I guess it all depends on how long it takes for supply chains to break down enough that industrial-scale fishing is no longer feasible. Though I'm sure the breakdown of society will also come with a surge of pollution when fossil fuel stockpiles are suddenly expended and environmental protections are abandoned in the name of survival. I suppose the collapse would just be the beginning and decades of worsening hardship would follow before recovery could begin.
>>5611091thread music>Ted Was Right - Behavioral Sinkhttps://honkfm.com/2495/behavioral-sink-ted-was-right/>videohttps://rumble.com/v4u0b59-behavioral-sink-ted-was-right.html
>>5611106>Whypipo evil >:(Letr's forget that China and India have massive middle classes that now consume and pollute way more than Whites do, cunt.
