Real, movies, games, cg animations. All are welcome.
>/wsg/>sound board>literally one webm contains sound, which wasn't posted by youYou need to go back.
>>5716320Every webm so far was posted by me and the one sound webm was made by me.
>>5716320This is the best crossboard tourists can do, unfortunately. It's too easy to make webms to excuse this kind of laziness.>inb4 OP complains about making webms instead of complainingOP, it's your responsibility, make an effort to redeem your thread and I will help.
>>5716121LOL russian tech!
get over it.
>>5716538
>>5716543
>>5716578
>>5716465I already responded to him here>>5716321I am OP
>>5716320many times people get webms that have no sound to begin with. If they did have sound there is no sauce to get the original. some of us aren't little babbies that whine and cry if webms don't have sound. maybe a little bit disappointed but certainly don't feel the need to snivel.
>>5716533>>5716548>>5716557>>5716558so little babbies don't get their diapers moist, these videos originally did NOT have sound.
>>5716144>local F-104 ruins everything
>>5716118Looks like something out of Macross.
>>5716144The crash footage has been very effectively scrubbed from the net, can't find it anywhere anymore
>>5717235>The crash footage has been very effectively scrubbed from the net, can't find it anywhere anymorewhat are you talking about. I have a copy of all the footage available from nasa, there never has been video of the collision or crash. just a still picture.
>>5716118>>5716881just think of all the failure points all the moving parts introduce
>>5717235found the copy I have will upload later. nothing exciting. from a DVD I got as a bonus in another DVD set.
I only got a few plane crashes webms.
>>5717235Is this what you want? this is the only know film of the crash, no one was filming when the actual collision happened.
>>5717967part 2
>>5716122I love these giant aircraft, like this one and the Banshee from Yukikaze, but how the fuck does it ever get in the air? What would the runway look like to get this thing off the ground?
>>5716126I love Yukikaze, and it never gets any love from anyone else.
>>5717983>but how the fuck does it ever get in the air? like any other plane. with landing gear>What would the runway look like to get this thing off the ground?really wide.
>>5717987I can see why.
>>5716881I was thinking more like ace combat.>>5717983It probably uses as many runways as it has columns of landing gear, and requires rocket assisted take off and parachutes to land. Its drones all probably need to be launched separately and then dock with it to save on weight.
>>5716122Too bad the battleship concept went obsolete like 100 years ago. It sure is cool.
>>5716150blue balls
>>5716120Miss this nigga like you wouldn't believe
>>5716531lmfao
>>5716153That's hot right there, m8.
>>5717687like a F-14?
>>5717643Look at that slut showing her fat ass to the crowd. What a whore.
>>5717967>>5717969refer to >>5716594
>>5719031I am well aware of the cause of the crash, what does that have to do with anything?
>>5719033Hello fellow 4chanx user. It seems you lack the ability to laugh at an old, dark, but fun jokes. It's okay, everyone's autism is different :)
>>5719046pretty lame joke.
>>5719049:^)
>>5719051ಠ_à²
>>5719046
>>5717637Odd that there are multiple stills but there is no video of the accident.
>>5718796The F-14 is a like a seesaw compared to the mess that model would be.
Fly high
>>5719153Time for Tomcat
>>5716153>transwing it identifies as a fixed wing aircraft you chud
>>5719098There absolutely is a video of the accident, it was even on YouTube at some point, the f104 was unsurprising at fault because it was an uncontrollable piece of garbage
>>5717687Just think about all the maintenance contracts LM can rake in with that.
>>5720129sorry dude, mandela effect. there was no video of the collision, only the video of the plane going down and results of the crash as posted previously.
>>5719141>>5719654shit overly loud music
>>5719098yeah because it was a photoshoot. video was an afterthought.
>>5720329Not the anon you were talking to. But they had just wrapped on the photoshoot and everyone was about to break off and carry on with what they had planned for the day. So most of the cameras were probably away too.
>>5720383exactly, also every documentary and story I read that mentions the photoshoot says that no motion picture film was being shot at the time the collision happens. I uploaded the only video that is know showing the plane going down in this thread. also the collision happened because the pilot could not see the plane properly where he was in formation not because the 104 is shit.so now he's going to respond, double down and have shit fit and insist that I am wrong and rage.he can locate Alejandro Ramirez who requested the report on the crash on 10-4-2005 through FOI (if he can find him).
>>5720129From 643903main_BreakingMishapChain-ebook.pdfpage 152"Disaster struck without warning. The tail of Walker’s F-104 collided with the Valkyrie’s right wingtip, allowing the horizontal tail surfaces of the Starfighter to be caught by a swirling vortex in which high-pressure air from the lower surface of the bomber’s wing met low-pressure air from the upper surface. The F-104 pitched upward, tearing through the XB-70’s right wingtip. The spinning airflow of the vortex then rolled Walker’s plane to the left, over the top of the bomber’s fuselage, where it sheared off both of the Valkyrie’s vertical tails. By this point the F-104 was in several pieces, the largest engulfed in a ball of fire fed by ruptured fuel tanks. Walker was killed instantly."
>>5720733page 155"24The length of the precision formation mission may have also been a factor. Cloudy weather had extended the flight time and forced the formation to move to a different area than originally planned. Additionally, Walker had been flying close to the bomber’s wing in a position that made it difficult for him to judge his distance from it. Likewise, other air traffic in the area created distractions. The effort to maintain formation created a heavy cockpit workload for Walker"
>>5720736page 155"AftermathBased on photographic and other evidence, investigators concluded that the swirling wake vortex from the bomber’s wingtip became a contributory factor in the accident only after the F-104’s tail came so close to the XB-70 that a collision was imminent."no motion film of the collision exists.the collision occurred due to a long string of events that started with the photo shoot was not authorized, and ended with 2 dead pilots. if you have ever read mishap reports they all read the same. people ignore procedures, maintenance is deferred, and everything leads up to people dying and/or million dollar equipment is destroyed.
mishap report 412tw-pa-22127 I downloaded this, but it had the report in a flash format, so I had to open it in a hyper-v windows XP machine I have and then print the report to an XPS format, then convert it back to PDF and run OCR. I read the report. this the only mention of film."Films of the flight showed a slight pitch oscillationof the F-104 when it was close to the XB-70 and also a momentary orange streak in the F-104 jet exhaust. These happenings have been interpreted as normal occurrences and are not believed to be indicativeof any F-104 malfunction."no mention in the report of film of the collision. I have the film/video mentioned in the report where you can see the orange streak come out of the F-104. the DVD video I have is 13 minutes long of film of the formation shot from different angles repetitively, the plane going down, and the crash scenes.some other info.https://www.designfax.net/news/archive/10-21-2008/stories/feature-8.asp
hey I know why don't you contact the pilot who flew the learjet at the time of the collision. Clay lacy in wichita kansas he's 92 and still alive.
https://tacairnet.com/2014/10/27/crash-of-the-valkyrie/read the comment by Paul Leatzaw in response to ericrosenwaldhttps://youtu.be/Rd0mSLv7zoA?t=2168https://roadrunnersinternationale.com/xb70_crash.htmlhere is the sequence of stills taken after the collisionhttps://roadrunnersinternationale.com/xb-70_crash_sequence.htmlhttps://www.claylacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Lucky-Me-Book-about-Clay-Lacy.pdfpage 107
https://www.thexhunters.com/xpeditions/xb-70a_accident.htmlthird paragraph in:>A motion picture camera had recorded all events until just before the collision, and then picked up again shortly afterwards. There were also numerous still photos of the accident sequence. The images showed that the F-104 pitched upward from its position in the formation, tearing through the XB-70's right wingtip. From there, the F-104 rolled inverted as it passed across the top of the XB-70, shearing off both of the ship's large vertical tails.
>>5716587shut up whiny bitch and let man complain, he has good reason
>>5717759>>5717760>kamikaze pilot destroying bomber carrying 3rd nuke over japan, colorized
>>5721083suck my dick babby.
>>5720129
>>5716145anybody know more about that launching mechanism? must be immensely powerful
>>5716569whats this from?
>>5723761Topgun 2>>5723738It looks like the standard steam catapult for a Nimitz class carrier.
>>5723820oh, top gun 2 went in a different direction from what i was expecting. thanks.>It looks like the standard steam catapult for a Nimitz class carrier.and thanks again. i found an article that mentions using steam from the ships reactors to push the piston, which is really cool. https://science.howstuffworks.com/aircraft-carrier3.htm
>>5723824where you born today?
>>5723824>oh, top gun 2 went in a different direction from what i was expecting.that video is heavily edited footage from the movie.
surprised no one posted THAT webm yet
>>5724487
>>5724640I bet she fucks like a fighter jet
>>5724496Jacob van Zanten would be proud. He Gaan, they Gaan.
>>5724640FUCK JET
>>5724504kino
>>5724500nailed the landing
>>5724770real
>>5724500Forgot to dump the fuel huh.
>>5724927He did a shit job at flaring too.
>>5716576I forgot, did the movie ever address why they couldn't just drop a GBU-57 from a B2 at 50,000 feet?
>>5725079Cos USNavy doesn't use B2.
>>5725079Same reason they couldn't use F-35s, some form of jamming. Nonsense, of course, that it would stop F-35s. But you can jam GPS.
>>5724606>>5724747actually yeah this was what I talking about
>>5724496>>5724497>>5724500>>5724502>>5724504these shows had great models and effects and absolute cringe plots.
>>5724770just shoot the drones they said.
>>5720169Whats the song?
>>5725422You best be trolling nigga
>>5725079Because those planes were off limits as the Air Force has them and would never put them in a movie until they are museum only tier.
>>5717987All the active Yukikaze threads are on /m/. /a/ and /k/ have some occasional mentions for it and are mostly positive as well.
>>5716569
>>5717773damn that pilot just spared that car bigtime
>>5716320>sound boardActually it is the worksafe gif board..gif is a format that has no sound.
Big plane make cool sound, lizard brain happy.
>>5716542What is he trying to do, Spin his airplane into the water in front of a bunch of rich boomers?
>>5716120It's a goddamn shame this helicopter was never adopted. I know that drones have essentially replaced it in its role, but Boeing had fully completed its development by the time the Pentagon canceled the program.
>>5729893He probably got hired to fly a banner over the beach.
>>5729893it's banner plane you ignorant fuck.
>>5716320>You need to go back.Reddit has sound in their videos.
>>5730800>>5730804>>5730807>>5730812>>5730823>>5730825could these be anymore boring?
>>5730812tape your pants legs closed when you ride on HAL or Jamaica airlines. they have a major problem with roaches. ask me how I know.
>>5724770Of all the movies that I have seen that predicted the future, Screamers was completely unexpected.
>>5716118
>>5738418
>>5738421
>>5716121What happened?
>>5740780ground the tailpipes of the engines on the runway because he pitched up too far on takeoff (a problem due to the short main undercarriage of the fulcrum)
>>5727813
>>5717833one of the B-52 crew's family was there to watch his last operational flight before retiring
>>5740780The pilot retracted the gear while the aircraft was still on the takeoff roll. The roll then became a slide. >>5740797No
>>5730800handsome aircraft
>>5730825great shot
>>5742865that move is retarded, in real life the missile would have hit him when he did that "cobra" thing.
>>5743301It was a good move if he did it 10 seconds earlier. The real failure is that the right counter to him doing that would be Tom flying the jet up because the enemy plane just lost a bunch of speed doing that, but he just flew up against the second missile so the writers thought flying up again wouldn't be dramatic enough.
>>5743445the movie makes no sense until you realize he dies when the hypersonic plane blows up and the rest of the movie is a death dream.you can't eject in plane going mach 10, or even around mach 2 without a special capsule like the f-111 had. there's a whole theory about it.see this >>5716569
>>5716118I only just now watched this, with all that shit, where is the fuel kept?
>>5744569Every other available space, with a bunch of little fuel tanks. But mostly the wings.
>>5724604Where's the plane and or flying vehicle?
I'm looking for a gif of an A-10 cleaning its teeth, does anyone happen to have it?
>>5731037I hope they're ok now
>>5716153This thing is cute
>>5750548
These plane threads used to be lively. Did planes and aviation stop being cool?
Source: https://www.twitter.com/BigJetTVLIVE/status/1865702898983743558
>>5716118>>5724640>>5724747
>>5716118Can someone explain the engines(?) sliding down? What's the purpose
>>5716131what the fuck he looks so goofy from the side
>>5756530taking off straight up from a standstill and hovering
>>5756543So down is their normal position for flight, and they slide up for takeoff and landing? That makes some sense
>>5756545There's probably a bit of crazy pie in the sky engineering going on as well. From the side view it looks like engines up is maybe a stealth configuration or something and engines down is normal flight. Just a guess.
>>5756530The air intake changes from the top to the bottom. Top side air intake protects the engine from sucking in ground debris caused by messy or damaged runways. Bottom air intake is bigger so the engine can get more air for higher power. Actually making something like this would require insane engineering for the fuel lines, fuel tanks in the wings, and the structure holding the plane together.
>>5720169>missile on our six
I wish WWII japan didn't annihilate all their records after WWIIwe could've gotten some cool info on their jet engine project, domestic nuclear program, Ku-Go "death-ray" project, etc. Is there even ANY WWII video footage from japan other than photographs?
>>5757197>we could've gotten some cool info on their jet engine project, domestic nuclear program, Ku-Go "death-ray" project, etc.no such things existed.
>>5757427No but I would watch a movie about how it was all covered up.
>>5757427They did have a nuclear weapons program, lead by Yoshio Nishina. They didn't get far.
>>5762903Best in thread)
>>5716922just curious how did the guy saying "nonono" know something went wrong? was it the sound or the direction the plane took? and what exactly went wrong here?i dont have any plane webms but i have plane girls
>>5763076It's a very unnatural movement to make in the middle of an air race of the type on display. So it's clear something went wrong.'The investigation report, released in August 2012, found that the probable cause of the crash was reused single-use locknuts in the left elevator trim tab system that loosened. This led to a fatigue crack in an attachment screw and allowed the trim tab to flutter. This flutter caused the trim tab link assembly to fail, which led to the loss of control of the aircraft. Untested and undocumented modifications to the airplane contributed to the accident. Particularly, the right trim tab had been fixed in place. Had both trim tabs been operational, the loss of the left trim tab alone may not have caused the loss of control. When the trim tab failed, Leeward experienced 17 g, which quickly incapacitated him and likely rendered him unconscious.'
>>5763076>just curious how did the guy saying "nonono" know something went wrong?because of the way that it was.
>>5716922props to the cameraman
>>5729865why do these make such a weird distinct noise
>>5763473>why do these make such a weird distinct noisebecause of the way that they are.
>>5716320You are so right
bump
Does anyone have that Harrier webm?
>>5761210I was thinking of this clip/audio about a month ago, ty anon
>>5730825I wonder if their pilots need pee jugs like their drivers?
>>5716569Reminder that LM said the SR-71 is the fastest acknowledged* air-breathing* aircraft ever made
>>5769829>recorded verticallyTerrible
>>5769829>>5769938
>>5769938Oh okay so it just had no landing gear out at all
>>5770254It was significantly too fast, "touched down" half-way down the runway and couldn't engage reverse thrust, because that simply doesn't work without the gears deployed.And off the runway there was effectively a brick wall to protect the inhabited area behind it.
>>5770276>advanced retard
>>5769683X-15 beats it if you remove air-breathing and takes off under its own power.
>>5769954Great music, thought it was Void Of Vision for a second
>>5717646>stealth bomber>bunch of people standing there watching it
>>5717833I wonder how much rage the crew felt at the guy who caused the crash right before impact
I'm sick of the 6MB limit
>>5772738https://files.catbox.moe/m8r4ag.mp4
>>5772738https://files.catbox.moe/2358fs.mp4>>5772741sorry, .flv with h264 stream
>>5753093>Did planes and aviation stop being cool?No. Planes are still cool.F-16 ~ creation, engineering & maintenancehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhhOin2p5Qs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw4iROXxMMw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmM5KSoW2qA
>>5772744thanks
>>5767935Anyone knows what is this anon talking about?
>>5767935>>5777177https://desuarchive.org/_/search/filename/harrier%20webm/
>>5717766who
>>5777212ty, that's what I was looking for.
>>5770600Wasnt the x-15 only launched from B-52 mother ships?
>>5770748Does anyone have the Backfire coming into land too fast and breaking apart after smacking the runway?
>>5777596correct
>>5717759>>5717760wat
>>5772738>>5776530much better qualityhttps://files.catbox.moe/7y9195.mp42010.02.23 Speedflying in Wengen 2010 [HalvorAngvik] [UwWLnaME0CI].mp4
>>5763076I hate you so goddamn much.
>>5783216
>>5725378Ahh the 60s/70s.
>>5725378Idk sabotaging the maiden flight of a nuclear airliner to lure out your objective is solid enough of a plot.
>>5777624
>>5716118I bet it conducts air to air intercepts like a washed up gogo dancer.
>>5770748Just how much cosmoline is used up just to warm-up the jet.engines?>>5784224W-Will the pilot be alright?
>>5784422Supposedly 1 of the 4 crew survived this.
>>5770748>those enginesWhat a monster. Top speed Mach 1.9 is not that fast however.
>>5769954Song?
>>5754221I bet she fucks like a fighter jet
>>5724747I bet it fucks like a gogo dancer
>>5716122I doubt something like this will ever be practical, but we do see drones carrying other drones in what looks like a somewhat improvised fashion already.Curious to see what it will be like when the concept has some time to mature
>>5787804I would guess something like a fixed wing drone carrying multiple quad copters. One way or another, be it communicating with a processor on the fixed wing drone or processing it themselves, the quadcopters will autonomously seek out human shaped blobs of heat and explode on them. And for some reason we'll keep making excuses and pretending there's any glory in this, because you'll just get in less trouble and called fewer names that way.
>>5787819>the quadcopters will autonomously seek out human shaped blobsIf I had to guess I think it will take some time until fully autonomous weapons like this. I think what's much more likely is some autonomous target seeking algorithm kicking in on the final approach only, so it can hit a target even if the pilot loses connection. But I'm not sure anyone would trust a computer to reliably avoid friendly fire or hitting civilians for now>we'll keep making excuses and pretending there's any glory in this, because you'll just get in less trouble and called fewer names that wayThat might have something to do with the bubble you're in. Me and everyone I talk to agrees how fucked up this new development is and my heart goes out to all the FPV-Drone Pilots getting traumatized forever or the kids frying their brains watching the footage online.
>>5788215>But I'm not sure anyone would trust a computer to reliably avoid friendly fire or hitting civilians for nowThere might be an answer to that in the form of a transponder that people wear, where your drones are supposed to avoid exploding near you if you have one on. The drones themselves will need to emit a signal and the transponder only emits a signal if it gets a valid signal from the drone otherwise it'll let the enemy know you're nearby. Of course, that means anyone without one or with an invalid response gets blown up, but we'll justify it with Gulf War II counter-insurgency doctrine that says any unidentified military age male is an enemy combatant, and if word managed to get out that they really were a civilian we'll say "they were an enemy supporter" and most people will believe it if they don't want to get in a shouting match, or their income taken from them.
>>5788288I think at the end of the day it will be a question of cost. After all Planes have been using a system like that since WW2.>but we'll justify it with Gulf War II counter-insurgency doctrine that says any unidentified military age male is an enemy combatantnow you've lost me again. I have my doubts if you can build a whole system on an assumption like that
>>5788299We already have social platforms that explicitly ban any "misinformation" about ongoing wars (and other topics), but to the best of my knowledge most of them are Mastodon/ActivityPub sites who enforce the rules of the biggest instances so they don't get defederated. Essentially, you can only post information from an unspoken whitelist of sources. I have absolutely no idea why some of the mainstream social media are relenting on that point now, I can only imagine they're trying to build up trust, before something or other changes and people suddenly have no where else to go and then they'll get even worse than they were in 2020. Their ad (i.e. for profit censorship) customers don't have any real reason to change their opinions, and government censorship mandates haven't changed a bit. In some countries, like France, "misinformation that might influence the outcome of an election" is still straight up illegal to say, and the EU is getting a "defending democracy" council whose job it is to separate "misinformation" from "things we'll allow you to say". If you're in the EU and their news media says some dead guy was a vatnik and therefore deserved to get blown to pieces, then he was a vatnik and therefore deserved to get blown to pieces, and you'll be fined if you say anything otherwise. That's just how it is now.
>>5716569I hate how Hollywood always puts lights inside helmets to light up the faces of the actors. IRL that would be so fucking annoying.
>>5754221I literally only pop into these threads whenever I miss her smiling face
