the future is now
>>5737851>the future is now
tooostin
>>5737851What the fuck?
god please make this a thing in all boards with audio
>audio doesn't loop MOOT
>>5737890do this PLEASE MOOOOOTYKINS ;_;
Based
seems it only works here and not on any other boardhopefully mods will have it patched out like the AV1 firefox and tranparency exploit soon enough, we dont need anymore shitters clogging up 4chinz with their crusty videos
test
hello staff may you bring back webp
>Adding support for H264 and MP4 instead of AV1Retarded mods.
>>5737925h264 is decoded by anything on the planetcopenseethen
>>5737926Just like VP9, which is much better than H264 at lower bitrates and already supported, H264 support is redundant.
>>5737919max copium
>>5737928vp9's encoder is basically broken.
>>5737933Sounds like a skill issue.
tiktok test
witam w 2016 skurwysyny xD
Can't post mp4 video from 4chanx it seems.
>>5737961not my problem
>>5737961https://pastebin.com/TZ3tskcNu can edit it like this
>>5737967Thank you brother
Isnt mp4 worse for file size tho?
>>5737987yes
They just be letting anybody in these days
Twitter video
Average Tiktok video
>>5737977vp9 for comparison
>>5738024she loves and built for bbc
What are the tech limitations? File size? Codec?
I mean, it's neat not having to convert shit, but how about adding the codec people are actually asking for?
>>5738079Yeah WE WANT JPEG-XL AND WE WANT IT NOW!!!
>>5737890don't to this the world would end if it happened (⸝⸝⸝O﹏ O⸝⸝⸝)
>>5737934>no bro If you just manually set the bitrate and then make 10 test encodes dropping/raising qmin/qmax it will totally hit a target filesizeIt's not a skill issue everyone who cares to know the workaround knows the workaround. It's just not worth my time and the workaround existing doesn't make the encoder any less broken.
>>5738088that's ez, just do it on /jp/ and nowhere else, it's the only board that matters anyway!
>>5737851Usecase?
>>5738089>no bro If you just manually set the bitratSo skill issue, concession accepted.
>>5738091Letting pajeets and normalfags post videos without the need for re-encoding
>>5738091Reminds me, here is the original source of angry ebussy posted for the first time.
>>5738095And the widespread WebM.
>>5738093Re-encode? You can literally download webm from its source without re-encoding, shitskin.
>>5738099As far as I know only YT and Instagram utilize VP9, so no, you can't repost from every site, shitskin.
>>5738102What's that from?
>>5738091Compatibility.
>>5738105https://x.com/gensho_yasuda
>>5738091its convenience mr ebussy
prööt pruut pierustaa
>>5737873I was trying to read the hiragana like "wtf is po pi po" then I started the video
>>5737902They cut off the punchline of the sketch and turned it into a fucking tiktok caption
>Error: Bad audio stream. Only Vorbis and Opus are supported.it's opushttps://files.catbox.moe/g1o2jj.mp4
>>5738129you're probably meant to use vp9+opus on webm and h264+aac on mp4 uploads
>>5738138
>>5738142>Error: Corrupt or unplayable videoadmins please fix
>>5738144works on my google botnet
>>5738092>won't say what he thinks the right thing to do is so he won't get btfoI'm bored anon. It's just boring.
>>5738145doesn't work on firefox it seems
>>5737952Song name?
>>5738088o_o;;;
direct from youtube
testan
So how did the first person who noticed you could post mp4s now find out when the sites administration never makes announcements for stuff like this?
>>5738183They pushed the change on github>>>/g/103232010
>Error: Corrupted file or unsupported file type.What the fuck
>>5738200only h264 as codec
>>5737873eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
>h264So the same as what we already have with VP9? Why not go for AV1 instead?Or does h265/HEVC re-encode better to h264
>>5737857based
>>5738233It's just that h264 is universally supported and easy to add. av1 not so much.
>>5737930What's this from?
>>5737967not him and sorry for the rhetorical question, but how do i do that?
>>5737884Song???????????????
>>5737967>>5738254nvm, i figured it out.
>>5738241eastern mind
>>5738265https://soundcloud.com/ipomoeaalba/dazzlin-dancerrrr
>>5738168interesting
>>5738233>So the same as what we already have with VP9?lol no, VP9 is much better than H264
>>5738233>Why not go for AV1 instead?just wait until av2 to get released
>>5738312It's only been 20 years since h264 was released, so at this rate av1 will be supported on 4chan by 2039.
>6mb file size limit>maximum duration 400 seconds I rather not get .mp4 feature and fix the above instead.