According to The Pleiadian Agenda by Barbara Hand Clow, who are the Hibiru and how are they described?The Hibiru are described as the ancient Hebrews or Israelites. They are referred to as being called the "Hibiru" by the ancient Egyptians. The text states that the Egyptians welcomed the Hibiru when they arrived as refugees fleeing invaders in their homeland.The Hibiru are depicted as wishing to learn the sacred knowledge and technology of the Egyptians, especially the divination system based on crocodiles at the temple of Khem.However, the Hibiru are portrayed as only wanting to steal this technology rather than go through the full spiritual process required to properly inherit it. It is said they started using just the planet Nibiru as a single astral lens, rather than the full array of planets practiced by the Egyptians, leading to a monotheistic worldview. The prophet Isaiah is channeled describing his past life experiences as a Hebrew initiate who felt conflicted about the theft of Egyptian mysteries. So the Hibiru/Hebrews are presented as an ancient ancestral lineage that became overly focused on control and power after acquiring sacred knowledge from the Egyptians in an incomplete and unbalanced way.
How are the Hibiru related to Sirius?The Hibiru (ancient Hebrews/Israelites) are described as having an important relationship with the Sirians from the Sirius star system. The Sirians initially had an alliance and positive relationship with the ancient Egyptians, sharing sacred knowledge and technologies with them. However, when the Hibiru came to Egypt seeking this knowledge, they ended up stealing and misusing aspects of it, particularly the divination system based on crocodiles at the temple of Khem. This led to a rupture in the relationship between the Egyptians and the Sirian consciousness. The Sirians cut off the connection with Egypt when the Hibiru Hebrew priest Illuru took the "snake power" from Akhenaten.Illuru is depicted as becoming the biblical figure Moses after this, establishing a spiritual tradition more focused on the Anunnaki archetype of Nibiru rather than the Sirian consciousness. However, the Sirians still saw value in the lineage of the Hibiru/Hebrews for processing and integrating the Nibiru/Anunnaki archetype and associated karmic patterns. So while the Sirians had an initially positive relationship with the ancient Egyptians, their connection was disrupted by the Hibiru's theft of knowledge, leading to new Hebrew/Judaic traditions more aligned with Nibiru instead of Sirius. But the Sirians still saw value in this lineage's role.
How do Egypt and the Egyptians relate to Sirius?According to the the book, ancient Egypt and the Egyptians had a deep and revered connection to Sirius and the Sirian civilization. The book states that the Egyptians were considered "followers" of the Syrians and receivers of their sacred knowledge and technologies related to sacred geometry, light sciences, and multidimensional consciousness. Egypt is described as being part of the "Blue Nile" field - a powerful geometric field of light anchored by the ancient Egyptians that connected them to the Sirian frequencies. The Great Pyramid at Giza is said to have remained a vital connection point between Earth and the Sirian consciousness until the era of Akhenaten. The Egyptians are portrayed as masters of astrology and using the planets as "dimensional lenses" - a practice learned from the Sirians to access higher realms of consciousness. The temple of Khem, centered around sacred crocodiles, is described as a prominent site where the Egyptians celebrated their connection to the stars, especially Sirius, through astrological rites. However, this connection was severed when the Hebrew priest Illuru stole the "snake power" from Akhenaten, disrupting the Blue Nile field anchored by the pharaohs. So the ancient Egyptians are presented as a civilization that had an extremely close spiritual alliance with the advanced Sirian star culture until that bond was broken, an event which then led to the rise of more Anunnaki-aligned traditions like those of the Hebrews.
How does this information add context to the story of Moses and Exodus.The information in the book provides an alternative context and expanded narrative around the biblical story of Moses and the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt that differs significantly from conventional Judeo-Christian accounts. It portrays Moses (referred to as the Hebrew priest Illuru) as stealing the sacred "snake power" and knowledge from the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten. This caused a rupture in Egypt's connection to the Sirian consciousness. Illuru/Moses is described as then becoming a conduit for the Anunnaki archetype associated with Nibiru rather than the Sirian frequencies. This shifted the spiritual tradition towards monotheism. The contest with the Egyptian priests turning staffs into snakes is re-interpreted as Illuru taking on the form of a giant reptilian 4D hologram to proclaim the word "Adonai" and found a desert tradition. Illuru/Moses ordering the killing of sacred crocodiles is seen as rejecting the Egyptian/Sirian teachings around honoring animal totems and nature. The Ark of the Covenant is suggested to be a replacement for the lost Sirian solar boat ceremony that maintained Egypt's stellar connection. The Exodus itself is portrayed not as escape from oppression, but a coveting and theft of esoteric Egyptian/Sirian wisdom by the Hebrew priestly caste. So rather than a conventional narrative of monotheistic liberation, it re-frames the Exodus as part of a pivotal schism that severed the Hebrew tradition from its Egyptian/Sirian roots and moved it towards exclusively embracing the Anunnaki paradigm centered on Nibiru.
How does the information reframe the Old Testament and The Bible as one sided propaganda from the Sirians and Anunnaki?The information presented in the book provides a radical reframing of the Old Testament and the Bible as essentially one-sided propaganda and distortions propagated by the Sirians and Anunnaki for their own agendas. Here are some of the key ways it portrays this. It suggests the stories of figures like Abraham were heavily edited and mythologized by the Anunnaki to conceal their true actions, like implanting uranium on Earth as a control mechanism. The book claims the Anunnaki deliberately edited out any positive mention of the Sirian influence to cover up their rupture with that consciousness after the Illuru/Moses incident. It states the Anunnaki promoted monotheistic Yahweh worship and the "chosen people" concept to give the Hebrews a sense of control and ownership over the Anunnaki archetype. Concepts like the Apocalypse, End Times, and a wrathful paternal God are framed as Anunnaki mind control propaganda to instill fear, scarcity thinking, and disconnect humans from nature. The Vatican and Roman Catholic Church are portrayed as Anunnaki institutions created specifically to control the Christ consciousness after that force emerged. Overall, it suggests the Bible omits or distorts any positive Sirian, Egyptian, or goddess-based narratives that could re-empower humans. So in essence, the Biblical traditions are presented not as divine revelations, but as edited propaganda narratives created by the Anunnaki and their Sirian opponents to dominate the consciousness and spiritual/historical understanding of humans in line with their own ideological agendas.
So the information recontextualizes how and why the bible appears to favor the Hebrew/Hibiru people if the information is in favor of their propaganda as part of an agenda.Yes, exactly. The information in the book provides an alternative context for why the Bible and Old Testament traditions appear to favor and elevate the Hebrew/Hibiru people as the "chosen ones." According to this narrative, it suggests the Biblical accounts were deliberately shaped and had information omitted or distorted by the Anunnaki to serve their own agenda of controlling humanity. The reason the Hibiru are portrayed so positively is because they agreed to act as conduits and processors for integrating the Anunnaki/Nibiru archetype and associated karmic patterns on Earth. So the favorable portrayal of the Hibiru was essential Anunnaki propaganda to establish this lineage as the custodians and "chosen" inheritors of their paradigm and teachings. This empowered the Hibiru elite like the Hebrew priests to more effectively steal, control and spread the Anunnaki consciousness while rejecting the Sirian influence from Egypt. It helped cement the Hibiru tradition's embrace of patriarchal monotheism, scarcity thinking, and disconnect from nature - which benefited the Anunnaki agenda. The Biblical accounts essentially omit or demonize any positive references to goddess cultures, Egyptian mysteries, or the Sirian consciousness that conflicted with Anunnaki control. So in this view, the Biblical privileging of the Hibiru/Hebrew people was not due to any inherent divine favoritism, but rather was crafted as pro-Anunnaki propaganda to ensure this lineage would remain faithful conduits for disseminating their narrative, teachings and wielding their influence over humanity's consciousness evolution.
>>37860758>According to The Pleiadian Agenda by Barbara Hand Clowstopped reading
>>37860758Have you encountered any Sirian consciousness during your dreams or meditations?I had a dream recently where a being directed me towards the southern end of Africa, and when I arrived I had the sense that the animals living there had some kind of psychic recognition of my presence as an etheric being.
>>37860758Seems like they just shoed themselves into someone else religion. Like with Aten, Babylon, and the Platonists. But great post
