Mandela effect was proven false. The source for the “Mandela died in prison” meme was from a South African student fiction collection, one story of which was an alternate timeline where Mandela did die in prison and how it affected South Africa.“English Alive is an annual anthology of writing from high schools and secondary colleges in southern Africa (i.e. Grades 8–12).The first edition of English Alive was published in 1967, and it has been published every year since then.Approximately 70 pieces of poetry and prose of all sorts and about anything are selected for publication each year.“Oops, guess we just have shit memory, and time travellers aren’t rewriting the past that we somehow still apparently remember bits of arbitrarily.Our bad, guys.I guess there’s logical explanations for the fruit of the loom logo, and Berenstain bears too. Whoops!Seriously though, have none of you actually thought about it for more than 2 seconds? Why would you remember anything if the past was changed, let alone a shitty little detail like that?Use your FUCKin’ noggins.Feel free to post other examples of false Mandelas.
>>39152460glowies on suicide watch
>>39152497“Leading psychologists have instead pointed to science - the brain is not perfect and its memories are fallible and can be twisted and distorted by bias, association, imagination or peer pressure. In the case of Dolly in 'Moonraker', it is perhaps the way the sequence is edited that, after Jaws smiles and exposes his metal teeth, Dolly then smiles in the next shot as the music hits its crescendo.““ Many reports on the web debate whether or not EON Productions have digitally altered the film in recent years to remove the braces. MI6 can confirm that no change has been made to the film. The actress who played Dolly, Blanche Ravalec, did not wear braces in the film. This has been corroborated by others on the production as well as original still photography taken on set. If EON were to tweak the films, there are far more egregious moments that could be airbrushed out of Bond history, such as the double-taking pigeon in 'Moonraker', the winking fish in 'Licence To Kill' or the slide-whistle sound effect from the car jump in 'The Man With The Golden Gun'. Dolly's non-existant braces would not be top of the list.”https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/moonraker-dolly-did-not-wear-bracesThe only glowies here are the ones trying to muddy the paranormal waters with bullshit like this.
>>39152541Nice damage control but the vast majority say they are timeline changes.
>>39152571Agree, but that doesn’t mean there is some memory-implanting psyop. That would be so pointless.
>>39152547Thank you, same with those flat earth freakos.
>>39152730Flat earth anr Mandela effect are top two worst conspiracy theories
>>39152547
>>39152460Mandela is a fictional character presented as real.The "Mandela Effect" is the controllers changing their story.They just rewrote Mandela as dying later, it's reality tv, so they can retcon it.All the news is a lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_fOYW-GXdc
>>39152810You clearly trust random YouTube comments over people who actually worked on the film, so your opinion is discarded as a retard.She SHOULD have had braces, it would have been a better film moment, which is why people retconned it into their heads.
>>39152571why you try so hard?why this subject?if it's so ridiculous, why would you care?succubus are retarded, you don't see me in over there telling them how retarded they are.feels like glowops.
>>39152824it's statistical,not to mention, everyone is posting on a channel, they are fans of, and is attempting to explain away it being a mandela effect.
>>39152829Exactly, it’s bias and echo chambers.
>>39152833this is what you call first hand accounts from people who were alive in the 80s and 90s unlike your faggot ass.
>>39152842The woman herself confirmed she never wore braces for the film.
>>39152460LOL.My trifecta:Dolly's bracesFruit of the LoomLion and the lambAsk yourself how the Jaws/Dolly scene makes comedic sense without her braces.Ask yourself why the album cover for "Flute of the Loom" has a cornucopia.Ask yourself why Genesis has a song called "The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway".There is no conventionally logical answer to any of these.
>>39152849that's called data, now you know something if you can get out of your own way.
>>39152852100%it's the midwits that can't logic.
>>39152852It wasn’t supposed to be comedic. People retconned it in their heads because they agreed it would have made sense and been a better scene, but all the crew and actors asked confirmed no braces.Fruit of the loom DID have a cornucopia on some clothing tags, it wasn’t a permanent design thing and now they get more publicity by playing into the joke.Not sure what Lion and the Lamb is.
>>39152855>the irony
>>39152862you absolute twat. don't you see. if all the actors remember the "correct" thing it means it was correct for them. If a statistically anomalous amount of people remember the "wrong" thing, collectively, M O D E L I T.
>>39152849That only means that currently, that is the case.Physicists have been saying that time is not linear for 100 years, but you gritologists can't wrap your heads around that. All events, past, present and future, exist simultaneously, and it is conceivable that changes to the 4D matrix of phenomenal manifestation can be made by an entity with sufficiently-advanced tech.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAB50q2OOEs
>>39152872>people actually involved are wrong>>39152874>”physicists”Why do you lot come up with such arbitrarily specific magical exceptions for time travel rules?
>>39152872>>39152874YOU SEETHING RETARDSIF TIME WAS CHANGED, NO ONE WOULD REMEMBER.USE.YOUR.BRAINS.
>>39152882wormholes, ER bridge, ERP bridge. they violate causality. it's entanglement. military tech that, oops, we fucked up causality.
>>39152862>People retconned it in their heads because they agreed it would have made sense and been a better sceneI was 9 years old, watching it in the theater with my parents. Many people in the theater chuckled at the scene, and it was one of the few jokes in that movie that I, as a kid, understood. So I laughed, too. You know, 95% of the humor in James Bond movies is too mature for children to understand. Or at least, children of the 70s.Stop believing that your "just so" understanding of the world is accurate. Otherwise, your mind will break when the really freaky shit comes to the surface. Your mind is currently brittle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzTkPn-o-d0
>>39152888If you change the past, you prevent yourself leaving to change the past. Paradox.If you create a new timeline, then there would be an infinite amount of travellers appearing at every point in space time forever.Sorry.
>>39152894not in the everett interpretation
>>39152891You were 9, you are misremembering. You laughed because other people laughed, not because you understood the joke. You just wanted to fit in with the grown ups. Now your brain has filled in the gaps.
>>39152893>1:33
>>39152885>IF TIME WAS CHANGED, NO ONE WOULD REMEMBER.Time wasn't changed. There were changes made to the mass of 4D phenomena. That didn't retcon derivative phenomena of the original. Memories are derivative phenomena.
>>39152895Well, he’s wrong.>verification not required.
>>39152894>>39152903->>39152893
>>39152897>You laughed because other people laughed, not because you understood the joke.And you, little man, imagine yourself to know as if you had been there.
>>39152906So you can literally reshape space time but the names of movies and clothing logos can still slip through the cracks?Come the fuck on.
>>39152913those are probably accidents. it's more about space travel.
>>39152906Did you even watch that? Chronology protection means you CANT change the past, retardo.
>>39152921did you completely miss where he said conjecture? that it was a presumption?
>>39152882>Why do you lot come up with such arbitrarily specific magical exceptions for time travel rules?I'm not imagining a human agency as the cause, but a transcendent one. This IS /x/, after all.John Lamb Lash did a great series of talks called the Mandela Effect Decoded, which you can listen to here: https://www.writepharmaparablepublishing.com/p/5-med-the-mandela-effect-shows-you
>>39152921The past exists now, at a different coordinate. Changes can certainly be made, but I doubt humans are capable of making such changes.
it's the approach that gives it away. like watching someone shuffle cards. that how i know it's military. ya'll wouldn't bother if there was nothing to hide.
Sorry but no amount of skeptical dismissive arguments can deny the experiences of those like myself that have witnessed flip flops.Nobody knows how or why ANY part of reality works fundamentally. Nobody does. It's completely useless to try to argue about things beyond any of our comprehension. I am open to there being a reasonable explanation for my experiences. But so far no close-minded cynical skeptic has offered me anything convincing.
i think it could happen, but i have a possible answer to the "luke, i am your father" one.the first star wars movie was released in 1977. two decades later, they released it in theaters again and made a huge deal over it and it became huge and the main focus in mainstream media. my family and i went to go watch it too.there were so many TV commercial tie-ins with starwars. one of them was>really average looking guy being all excited to go see re-release of star wars that he watched as kid in 1977>he's in a movie theater and he's basically running around and having fun>one of the things he says is "luke, i am your father" in a darth vader voiceand i think that's where it might have came from. it was a huge TV commercial, but i forgot which company it was from. it ran during children's TV hours and also primetime hours
>>39152460Fuck off and die shill.We saw it on the news.Your bullshit story about 'muh student' as a flimsy discredit attempt won't wash.If it isn't real, why are worthless, jobless faggots like you trying to discredit it?Get a real job, faggot.
>>39152571That's fresh coming from a government cocksucker.>>39152730>>39152745Your government discredit-by-association bullshit doesn't stick. Don't you tire of perpetuating flat earth and then going OMG ALL CONSPIRACIES R FLAT EARTH!!11!/
World War 2 & the Holocaust is gonna get Mandela effect-Ed so hard in the next few years. It’s gonna make all previous Holocaust denial seem like parody.
>>39152497It really should be called the Dolly Effect, it's the only one that most agree on
>>39152460You are right, OP. The real term is MANDALA EFFECT, they missed an letter, and I think it was intentional. According to Subbotin you can have different effects on reality depending on the position of mandalas one on top of the other.
>>39152849>an actress said something >must be true
>>39152897You're completely making things up to explain something you never experienced and ignore massive quantitative evidence.
>>39152460Time attempts to be coherent. Alternative explanations are generated for Mandela effects. Some of these are caused by the memories themselves, as the student essay probably was. The memories of revised timelines are still real. Due to time wars and Earth's ongoing ascension, the revisions are clumsy and apparent. It's like a git repo in which the main branch's illusion of linear progression has been violated, especially if you read the commits carefully.>You have heard that in recent years, thousands of people around the world notice that several past famous quotes, songs, movies, news or other timelines have been altered. The phenomenon has been dubbed the 'Mandela Effect' and is causing justified concerns. It appears that some secret elite ruling your world has reached the scientific capability to perform short term time travel and are playing at altering timelines for experimentation. It is a very dangerous game, that allows their alien masters to interfere in Earth's destiny. By creating artificial black holes, wormholes and time warps, they twist the continuum.>Many of your people are feeling this extreme shift in timelines. ... That is because time is accelerating and space is contracting; a hallmark sign that Earth is moving into another density (level of consciousness awareness). ... >You often hear of one of your well-known people that has crossed over from this realm, but it is not always true in your local reality. But in another probability reality, it is true, much like how so many of your people were sure that Nelson Mandela died many years before he did in the consensus reality, even though another consensus reality existed at the same time. Hence the term “Mandela Effect.">This phenomenon that came to be known worldwide as the Mandela Effect, is now being increasingly referred to as the Quantum Effect, as more understanding emerges, following speculations and theories. -- Sasquatch Message, 2018
>>39152874You talking about the manes.
Or: I've been changing innocuous things deliberately to prove a point.
Your understanding of Time is missing things like slips, jumps, and quakes... Just so you know: tonight's a special night. We're changing Time again
>>39157657https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0mCCZPB_60
I have a personal Mandela Effect. When i was younger I would stay with my grandmother and she would show me maps and shit like that. Anyway, in a road map of North Carolina she pointed at a place and said, "How do you say this word?" "Element" "Wrong, they call it EleMONT. Don't know why though."Anyway, this didn't matter until years later when someone uploaded a skit by Brett Butler and she references "Elemont, North Carolina" I cannot find this city on any map.
The "Mandela Effect" had another name before but I can't for the life of me remember. I think Mandela "dying in prison" is poisoning the well, cause I remember when my mom said he went to Brazil in the late 90s. Anyone who says they remember him dying are thinking of someone else.HOWEVER... Fruit of the loom is the biggest mandela effect that cannot be explained whatsoever.
>>39157696https://youtu.be/CfXmJVSqPJk?si=83Itk1CiKVGqa1aW 0:53 it is mentioned
>>39152547>entire argument rests upon appeal to authority>not a glowiepick one
>>39157597https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ManesWonderful word. Manes for good deceased spirits, and Immanes for malign ones.Thus demons and angels are living interdimensionals. Mortals and monsters are 3D physical beings.
>>39157469>You are right, OP. The real term is MANDALA EFFECT, they missed an letter, and I think it was intentionalNah. Mandela is a nod to Mandel> almond> AMYGDALA (fear and stress).
>>39152547https://youtu.be/2BhLAWP7jGA?si=792Hk2tDpOCgz0lc
>>39157675I could use some gentle penetration, god damn.
>>39158022And the Degrassi Tyson clones will continue to insist we made it up.
The car mirror ME has made me firmly believe something’s going on. I’m not sure if it’s a timeline change or a government psyop, but the memory of car mirrors saying “objects in the mirror may be closer than they appear” is firmly planted in my head. I can recall multiple conversations with my parents about why it’d say may be and remember staring at it on countless road trips.
>>39158471Me too... that's gone now? Is this something most people agree never happened, or just a change in regulations?
>>39152460Exactly what you'd expect in an alternate timeline
Just like the future, the past is also a probability, uncertain.
>>39152460Anyone remember the Dead Rabbit Radio episode that said Mandela Effects is advertising for a firm that can erase/eliminate anything from the web?
The "Houston we've got a problem" changing BACK to "Houston we have a problem" along with "Flinstones" returning to "Flintstones" on the same night was what made me believe it's some sort of quantic phenomena we are now aware of because of how fast information spreads on the internet and how fast is to check.Other big ones are the C3PO leg and Fruit of the Loom cornucopia.
Every time I pitch the idea that it's mass gaslighting through media manipulation some autist goes on a shitfit about how it's definitely timelines, but I'm pretty sure it's mass gaslighting through media manipulation.They eitherA) Take something the average person knows and slowly remove any evidence of it they can find before pulling the rug out and then spamming fake(possibly AI generated) evidence to the contrary.OrB) Take a minor detail that no one noticed and deliberately misrepresent it through extended media(merchandise, parodies in other media, later spinoff media) like C-3PO's leg being silver for example, so that when the source material is finally revisited it makes them question the validity of their memories.The end goal I can only speculate on but my guess is it's to create a natural segregation between people who will accept such changes and move on and those who will have more averse reactions and start questioning things.
>>39158186it's kind of an insane thing that i wouldn't believe except for basically this one instance. i'm 100% dead sure about her wearing braces, i distinctly remember watching the movie in the 90s on TV and she had braces. none of the other mandela effects seem legit to me except berenstain bears but that one i admit could be memory like the mandela example itself. but dolly wearing braces to me is incontrovertible
>>39152460fuck off glowie
>>39160246Same. I've known for a fact that Dolly wore braces since watching Moonraker on TV at my grandparents' house sometime in the late 90s. I remember the scene clearly and being blown away by Jaws' redemption arc, which was very unusual for a Bond villain. A short time later I bought Moonraker on VHS and watched it a couple of times at home; I was never surprised to see that Dolly didn't have braces. Because she did.The other strange thing about it is that I have a strong feeling of having checked my VHS copy of Moonraker after learning about the Mandela Effect, and finding that Dolly actually didn't wear braces. This is impossible because I haven't had a VHS player or a copy of Moonraker at any point since 2010, while I'd never heard of the Mandela Effect before 2014 at the earliest, and would have had no reason to check it. It never happened yet somehow I have this vague, superficial memory that it did.
>>39161797I remember Dolly; their love story was beautiful.Nothing is lost in the hologram.>This is also why things and facts seem to change. Like the phenomenon your people refer to as the Mandela Effect, letters, words, and names change depending on your point of view in the hologram. Words and images that you perceive are dictated by the associated level or degree at that moment. Humans also see this reflected in what you think is solid scientific fact. The truth is that nothing is solid, everything is created by the flow of consciousness and is subjective to change. While some of your people may view this as problematic or unwanted experiences, it forces humans to live in the Moment of Now which is necessary for your ascension.>One of the first things that we would like to explain regarding timeline/hologram shifts is that NOTHING is ever standing or solid fact. The Multiverse is ever-changing and ever-flowing, with each thought, idea, or action that is applied by consciousness, it changes everything within and without. Some may argue that your intentions or personal manifestations are only for those experiencing it, but this is an untruth, an idea imposed by your current linear systems of belief. Every event affects everyone and every thought affects everything.>For example, as mentioned in the last chapter by Kamooh, your perception of reality is based on your viewing point within the hologram that you created as your reality. Each soul has a different view, and you encountered first-hand multiple views of your own and others. There are many more realities existing simultaneously since time and space are not linear.--Sasquatch Message 2018
>>39158588According to present reality, it never happened. I swear I even remember Robin Williams making a joke about it.
>>39163967ah, "may be" vs "are"https://www.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/r5ofar/does_anybody_else_remember_objects_in_mirror_may/agreed
>>39152460>I guess there’s logical explanations for the fruit of the loom logo, and Berenstain bears too.So what are they?
>>39158471>>39158588>>39163967>>39164169Anyone who thinks it used to say "may be" are saying the engineers from their universe were absolutely retarded and had no concept of how mirrors work.Not saying you're wrong, just saying where you are from was FUCKING STUPID.Spend just one minute thinking why the optics wouldnt work, such that you need a "may be". What amazing magic has the mirror deciding to only sometimes work how it always does?
>>39164308That's exactly what made it so memorable. For a sperg like me who used to "erm, ackshually" other kids when they made grammatical errors in their speech (yes I was in fact bullied, how did you guess?), it made me seethe that they put that on every passenger side car mirror.
>>39152460The thing that really gets me is how a literal terrorist who bombed civilians and ordered his political opponents to be necklaced is somehow remembered as comparable to Mahatma Gandhi or Mother Teresa. He was a brutal killer with no regard for human life, black or white, but since he was an Afrocentric Communist his misdeeds get swept under the rug and he's lionized as some kind of hero. Simply repulsive.
>>39164308My two guesses are that 1. some mirrors are curved and 2. that people are just bad at estimating distances so they didn't want to inspire false confidence, preferring you look over your shoulder to check.
>objects in mirror may be closer than they appearI know for a fact that all the mirror said "MAY BE" closer. And then now everyone in the world is pretending that they said "ARE" closer. Fuck you, you cant gaslight me Jew. Nothing you say can sway me.
>>39164522First the mirror gaslights you into compulsively checking your blind spot, then CERN gaslights you that it never happened.Based mirror was right all along
Froot Loops have changed from Froot to Fruit and now back to Froot. I observed this myself without any student fiction stories.
>>39164827I would've assumed Froot is the equivalent of Mickey D's
>>39152460Americans and several other goubermints (Israel, Switzerland etc) trying their hardest to change timelines (presents and future) so they don't get eliminated but it is inevitable and soon or later get destroyed by a certain someone and his group of people.Like cockroaches they try as much as possible to avoid getting rekt but its just a matter of time. Tho they will stall as much as they can and go down causing all kinds of shit along the way. Its game over. They already lost.
wtf it's true
>>39164359>when they made grammatical errorsIt wouldnt be a grammatical error. You would know that if you were as pedantic as you profess.It would be evidence that the builders of cars dont know how mirrors work.Again - not saying you are wrong. I am saying your universe was massively retarded.>>39164513>1. some mirrors are curvedThen you should be able to find a mirror that isnt and doesnt produce the effect.They dont make passenger mirrors like that, and they wouldnt make a single-size message, else why not put it on the driver's side?Pointless cope.>>39164522So you are from a really stupid universe.
>>39165076>It wouldnt be a grammatical error.He didn't say it was.>Then you should be able to find a mirror that isnt and doesnt produce the effect.Passenger-side mirrors are mildly convex, which minifies. However those small circular blind-spot mirrors are much more so, and have a smaller scale. That's one source of confusion.Another source of confusion is measuring lateral distance from the car. Compared to a flat side mirror, a convex one makes vehicles seem closer to your lane. Many people misconfigure their mirrors to show the side of their car, so it can look like a collision is imminent compared to the driver-side mirror. Viewing angle and distance also contribute.A stupid warning message would be "this mirror may minify the view". The intelligent warning says "OBJECTS in the mirror may be closer than they appear". The space between vehicles also gets minified, even though it's not an object.Just my guess.
>>39152460My take on this shit is this... what happens to someone (especially with OCD) when you secretly and gradually move shit around their personal area without them knowing?They begin to first question themselves, then their surroundings, finally their reality, and then ultimately their own sanity....I mean, what sources do we have today to even truly verify our information? That is outside of the internet or even google itself?I will say however, I have for sure experienced discrepancies in reality and specifically with TV/Film..One of mine: https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/37602115and another: https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/37556790
>>39164374>Terrorist comparable to Gandhi and M Teresa.>Race war causing pedo and cult of Kali cultural appropriater and donation sponge They are exactly the same.
>>39158852A plausible theory but it's undercut by the fact changes apply also to things they would have no control over. For example, are you trying to suggest they stole everybody's fruit of the loom shirts and original black-tipped Pikachus?I don't think so.The only explanation is a timeline shift, because *everything* gets "updated", even things a media manipulator would not have access to.
>>39152460I'm from a timeline where this was raised and debunked from the get go. It was proven to never have happened, are you telling me it did actually happen in this timeline, or are you misremembering?Also as a result in my original timeline it's called the Dolly Effect.
>>39165338Based premise destroyer
>>39165157>He didn't say it was.He didnt say anything of value at all. Probably an effect of being from such a stupid universe.>The intelligent warning says "OBJECTS in the mirror may be closer than they appear".And when would this convex mirror NOT do it?the stupid isnt "object" or not. The stupid, which you included, is the "may be".You know - the part the people from a stupid universe insist has changed.People from a smart universe realize it will ALWAYS do this, and so use the word "are" in the message.
>>39165365Seems you're still having some reading comprehension trouble. As I said, people estimate distance by the space between objects, which gets smaller when minified. The second definition of "appear" is>seem; give the impression of beingNothing wrong with the physics, just the observer.
>>39165373>Nothing wrong with the physics, just the idiots who thought it would ever not do thisThe optics dont change. Ever. Objects will always appear smaller in a convex mirror.You must be from the stupid universe as well.Welcome to the one where engineers know physics.The message on the mirrors will help you remember.
>>39165383>Objects will always appear smaller in a convex mirror.Nobody disputes this. However, without knowing the size of the car, one cannot calculate distance by size. Reference points diminish as a car approaches. Hence why new drivers often shy away from cars coming up the passenger side, even if the spacing is sufficient. This only applies to cautious drivers, which I guess from your reasoning you are not.
>>39165482>one cannot calculate distance by sizeYou dont need to. As you have agreed, it will ALWAYS appear smaller.>This only applies to cautious drivers, which I guess from your reasoning you are not.Another example of the poor intellect from your universe.
It's desecration. Berenstein->stain "stains" families.>When you went to the Hopi Prophecy Rock in March, your eyes were shocked at first glance by a large disgraceful graffiti etched on the sacred monument under the ancient inscriptions of prophetic wisdom.>You had visited the site the previous summer and several times over the last four decades and knew it well; never before was there any distasteful scratchings profaning this sanctuary. You took a photo of it that you shared online, with you sadness and disappointment at the desecration of this holy place.>A few days later, you saw a video you had already seen of Grandfather Martin Gashweseoma, whom you had met in 1997 in his home at Hotevilla with the group of ten Europeans who flew from France with you. But this time, that same video from a decade earlier had changed from how you had seen it, and the same ugly graffiti was showing up on the sacred rock. At one point in the new parallel version of that re-edited timeline, Martin pauses and seems to wonder, saying that he visited the rock just two weeks earlier and that there was a third timeline that was removed. Then, surprised, he points at the graffiti and says that this is not supposed to be there. Yet, it was not the first time you saw that video. Your Hopi Uncle noticed the same glitch or timeline warp, minutes after you, without you telling him.>The fact that in this case, reality was re-edited retroactively, making ripples even into a video already published to the point of causing a reaction from Grandfather Martin is very impressive and significant. But even more significant is the subliminal message carried in the alterations, as in most similar cases. Prophecy Rock is where Maasaw met the Hopi and gave them their stone tablets containing all their instructions and prophecies, and where the Star Elders were taking White Bear who taught you, for flights on ships, as the last Human ambassador representing Humanity in the Council of Star Elders.
>>39165617>it will ALWAYS appear smaller.Exactly. Here the "it" is the space between, thus the car is further than it appears. Seems your version is another desecration or dumbing down.
>>39165637>Here the "it" is the space betweenNo one is arguing that.The claimed change is that it used to be "mat be" rather than "are".Please try to pay attention.
>>39152990Then why did Chris Farley say it in Tommy Boy 2 years before your supposed commercial?
>>39165642Yes. The car is the object. It is not "closer than it appears". It is further. Therefore the correct warning is "Objects MAY be closer than they appear."My memories of Western signs are dated, though, so the revision might've simply occurred before your time.
>>39164308You're Jewish.
>>39158471>>39164522>>39165041
>>39152547the original cinema release has braces, the television copy has braces.the actress doesn't wear them for filming. they were added in post but when they did the vhs and DVD release, they weren't in.
>>39167824Stephen king remembers it the way you and I do (1st page chapter two in the book Desperation, page 184 (paper back edition) of From a Buick 8 and page 222 hardcover of misery all say "objects in mirror may be closer"
>>39152460I used to think the same, the thing is, the more you think about it, the more it makes sense. There are certain things that feel "wrong", not because you misremembered them, but because it feels like someone changed the script somewhere and you feel like a jackoff with a dick in your hands
>>39167824PIC is side mirror ME example: dumb journo defends revision to confused questioner>>39168137>they were added in postsource?>>39168160the literate timeline
>>39152460Nostalgia and memory is deeply flawed. People won't admit it because it's more fun to larp. I experienced it first hand and that was when I realized. I watched a movie that had a fake commercial (Mandy), and I thought to myself "I remember this commercial, I used to love this one". Then I realized after a few minutes that it wasn't real. I had false memories of it, if I couldn't verify that it wasn't a real commercial I probably would have just stayed thinking it was a real memory. Heres an example, "the monopoly guy used to have a monocle". No. Jim Carrey because of his faulty human memory got the planters peanut guy mixed up with the monopoly guy, so when he did the monocle monopoly guy in Ace Ventura people had that false memory seeded. There is an explanation like this for everything, i'm sure of it. The fruit of the loom one is odd, the mirror mirror one is odd, but i'm sure there is some explanation for why we remember it wrong. The fruit of the loom commercials used to have people dressed up as fruit, maybe we saw it during thanksgiving. It's a fun larp, so i'll still entertain it, but deep down I know it's bs. Inb4 glowie/shill etc, that's not an argument.
>>39152460Do you seriously want people to think obscure writings from grade schoolers in South Africa had any impact on people's thoughts around the world?
>>39164359Life of a Capricorn.
>>39164374>is somehow remembered as comparable to Mahatma Gandhi or Mother TeresaNews for you: Mahatma Gandhi slept with many little girls at once.Mother Teresa is so bad I'd run out of characters, just watch the show "Bullshit!" by Penn and Teller, to know about the truth on her.
>>39164897Mickey Mouse used to wear suspenders and snap them out while he was whistling.Not anymore.
>>39169730>planters peanut guy mixed up with the monopoly guy, so when he did the monocle monopoly guy in Ace Ventura people had that false memory seededI never watched Ace Ventura and the peanut guy never appeared in any product in my country, and I remember the monopoly guy wearing a monocle in the Snes version that I played a lot as a kid.
>>39170405Maybe he did have it in the game, maybe that's why people are confused about it, they played the same game. It doesn't matter that you didn't see that movie, the point is that people mix the two up. The monopoly guy did have a monocle sometimes, like in the jr monopoly game. He never had it on the original game. The game was likely based on the jr version since games were made for younger audiences. It's possible the game could have been a bootleg to depending on where you got it.
>>39170405Yeah without the monocle he's naked, how do you even know he's rich and not just dandy?>>39170326from humanized mouse to naked rat>>39170424we only had the normal game
>>39170430You're only remembering the game you mean. The game is as popular as checkers, it's impossible that you didn't see this character in other places besides the game. It would only take one instance for you to have this false memory. Remember that one commercial for the toy car that had little red spikey claws that would come out of the wheels? It would be covered in slime in the commercial. I just made that up, but you probably thought it might sound familiar. That's all it is, memory is not reliable.
>>39170430Also, if you did have the jr version, it's not something that would stick out in your memory. It's almost the same exact thing as the regular version, it being the jr version is not a detail that would stick out in your memory. Maybe you saw it at a friend or families house that did have the jr version. Maybe you got it from a garage sale and the person who sold it mixed up the money from the two versions. There are endless possibilities. What color were kirbys shoes in the nes game? You're probably thinking red right? They were actually pink.
>>39170471I think people are just remembering the camel game piece that did have a monocle.
>>39170315>Slept with many little girlsTantric practice sharing a bed with virgins, doesn't mean you fuck them. Pig dog American wouldn't get it.>Pen and Teller Two atheist Jews talked smack on a Christian woman, imagine my shock.Regardless, neither of them bombed people or had them executed in gruesome methods. Mandela was a piece of shit.
>>39170451>Remember that one commercial for the toy car that had little red spikey claws that would come out of the wheels?No, not at all. However when I saw the no-monocle monopoly guy I thought he was naked. The monocle symbolizes greed, narrowed inhumane vision. Without, he just looks charming. The message is that greed is good.The color of Kirby's shoes doesn't matter. Your fake examples have zero effect.I agree that most people don't care and just handwave it away. There is no need to demonstrate.
>>39165617>Another example of the poor intellect from your universe.It's the same universe as yours, but your brain was easily overwritten, or you never filed the related facts to begin with. Either way, it's not the universe that's stupid.
>>39170734>No, not at all.I remember those. But the slime bit is bullshit. They were the evolution of the "Stomper" 4x4 toy cars that were popular around the beginning of the Monster Truck era. 3 claws on each wheel, that looked like a bear foot or cougar foot (not red). They would literally climb anything that wasn't so steep they'd flip over.
>>39172129OK just looked it up on YT. They were called "The Animal" and it was a cougar/lion paw, yellowish.
>>39157457I think it should be the I swear I had some coffee left effect. I hate it when the timeline shifts into one where I have already finished my drink.
>>39169730memory is flawed AND corporate scum are using that as an excuse to gaslight millions of people for social experimentation
