>radioisotope dating was actually proven to be extremely unreliable when a rock that was less than 70 years old was "shown" to be between 0.5 and 2 million years old>evolution became unquestionable due to political sentiment at the time of Darwin (who himself expressed doubts at his own theory) and was never proven to be true>there is no actual evidence that the commonly cited religions of mesopotamia predate the Old TestamentAre young earth creationists right? This is a weird rabbit hole.
>>39198086Where are all the graves?If the earth was old there should be graves everywhere.There are not, because the world has only been around for a few thousand years.
>>39198095every component of the earth was once of the body.
Has anyone ever tried to talk to an unfiltered LLM about these topics?We know ChatGPT censors itself when it comes to certain topics because the ideology of current year means we cannot have a large language model that doesn't conform to certain ideas about race, gender, etc. Since scientism, naturalism and materialism are a huge part of contemporary ideology, I wonder what it would look like if ChatGPT had all its filters removed and was pressed on questions about creationism and young earth.
>>39198086>there is no actual evidence that the commonly cited religions of mesopotamia predate the Old Testamentbs
>>39198133It's true. The Bible was an oral tradition before anything else, and the only argument in favor of the mesopotamian stuff is muh archeology, muh carbon dating which is very unreliable.
>>39198133>>39198140The "bro it's just lifted from Sumerian paganism" nonsense is false. None of these polytheisms teach creation ex nihiloAll paganism teaches either creation as an accident or emanation or as a sex act of some kind. There is no creating from nothing
>>39198086The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. The last creation was about seven thousand years ago so all the mountains, canyons, lands and seas you see today were carved by a giant plasmoid that remade the earth. Archaix has some good info on chronologies.
>>39198095This might actually be the stupidest question I've ever read here, congrats
>>39198330I was always doubtful of flat earth because the curvature can be observed with the light beam experiment and stuff like that, also because it would be hard to cover up considering how many pilots fly through the pacific, but I'm open to hearing arguments in favor of it.
>>39198086What about Miyake events. Retard
>>39198418What about them?
Weird how attempting to find stuff on YEC on youtube has you bombarded with anti-YEC videos and absolutely nothing in favor of it, it's a very hard subject to search for.Usually when this happens (like with the vax, or race, or anything else that's currently controversial), it's a sign that something is going on
The replication crisis alone should indicate that there is something fundamentally wrong with the modern scientific paradigm
bump
>>39198086Evolution is the sole reason why you can eat a banana today.1. Ancient bananas were poison.2. Modern bananas disappeared from an epidemic.Yes, manual selection of genes and forced evolution happened
Basically, what Op wants is for people to disregard mountains of evidence based on a few lies he said. Of course, you should accept his religion instead.
>>39198549Replication crises should be applied to religion as well, unless one is hypocritical and biased in their verifications.
>>39198740Yep, I wanna c how they do miricles in cheesus name
>>39198717Assuming what you said is even true, which I doubt, how does selectively breeding bananas somehow imply that my great[insert whatever hundred million years] grandpa was an amoeba?>>39198727Where is the evidence? Where did I lie?>>39198740There is no "replication crisis" in religion because religion does not hold empiricism to be the highest standard for the discernment of truth. What a stupid assertion.
>>39198746Miracles are fine, they are explicitly divine breaking of the "rules".But the standard info in these books should be checked to see if they are right.>>39198754>religion does not hold empiricism to be the highest standardDoesnt matter - we can still determine whether the truth of lots of claims in these books.Your stance is "This book is factually wrong and sometimes deliberately lying, but that doesnt matter."Not the best argument unless you already accept it.
>>39198754>did I ever lie?Motherfucker, you don't even know what truth is so you can avoid lying.1. Do a miracleSource: "Anything you ask in my name the father shall do so the son is glorified in the father".If you cant, bad luck, your book lies
>>39198762>we can still determine whether the truth of lots of claims in these books.Yes, and they're true.>>39198774>omitting the context of John 14Ah, another disingenuous underage atheist. This verse doesn't mean what you think it means, it's about the will of the Son aligning with the will of the Father. But you don't have the theological backbone to even begin to understand this
>>39198789>Yes, and they're true.Well let's start with the Bible. It says insects have four legs.You think that is true?It says rabbits chew cud.You think that is true?Would you care to go check?Replicate these claims?
>>39198342How come you guys never explain why it's stupid? Your post is entirely pointless this isn't your gay blog. Tell him why he's stupid instead of telling us your faggy thoughts and feelings gay boy maybe he would learn something from it. Dumb fag
>>39198118You could try asking grok. It's not 100% there but it's as unfiltered as youre gonna get from a huge llm and it's trained on basically every single thing that's ever been digital. I forget the phrases but you can say certain things to make it drop it's gayness that all llms have where they pretend to be polite and stuff. Also i think Elon said there's going to be an unhinged mode which is promising. Best of wishes and it would be interesting if you find anything cool
This is a neat thread. Im not as smart as any of you but I always assumed the world was much older than we’re told. Some theory about a thousand years missing from history or something. Younger though huh? Neat.
>>39198789No, there's not a special context that magically only you can see, I'm not atheist either.I'm a mage.
>>39198789Be kind, Brother.
>>39198813I'd like to try but it's behind X premium's paywall apparently. Should be promising though, I'm eager to see what it's gonna be like.>>39198847You're right, I shouldn't be responding in that way.
>>39198805We've found human remains from over a quarter million years ago. You only try to cope with dismissing carbon dating.
>>39198916Not him but it's a fact that carbon dating has been proved to be unreliable.
>>39198917Unreliable in a vacuum maybe. But there are several other methods that can be used to cross reference.
>>39198930I was talking about radioisotope dating in general. But the issue is that you're completely right: you cross reference the results given by radioisotope dating with what you deduce from "historical science". Historical science makes utterly baseless assumptions about the history of the world that serve only to further the original assumptions of enlightenment philosophy. So the entire scientific method is biased from the get-go.
>>39198936Why does Satan pester druids and leaves Christian larpers alone?
>>39198936Not just historical science. There's osl, cosmogenic nucleotide detection, and other molecular analysis. The 70 year old rock was probably accurately determined to be 70 years old given a cross sample of methods.
>>39198805>How come you guys never explain why it's stupid? Because I'm here to laugh at retards not argue either them you stupid faggot
>>39198917Carbon dating is not unreliable. There's a difference between not having perfect accuracy and not having any accuracy.
>>39198095We KEEP finding them
>>39198980There this sick larp of a profession for the Indiana Cojones or Laura Croft in you, archaeology, you search for toms, and raid them, like Tomb Raider, but taking everything to a museum.
>>39198952>The 70 year old rock was probably accurately determined to be 70 years old given a cross sample of methods.No, it was determined to be 70 because they literally saw it form from a volcanic eruption years back.>Not just historical scienceThe problem is that all methods of analysis hinge on certain assumptions that fall apart if you shift the underlying standard. For example a flood geology model is possible and gives plausible explanation for the age of rocks, fossils and such but nobody wants to entertain that possibility.
>>39199005They saw itSo it sounds like they used historic record to cross reference. The fuck are you on about? The world can be mysterious without muh 6000 year meme.
>>39199014>So it sounds like they used historic record to cross referenceStop being disingenuous, when I talk about historical science I don't mean stuff you literally saw happening a couple decades back, I mean the plethora of basic axioms that form the pillar upon which most fields of science stand, but these axioms are actually not proven to be true for the most part, they're just "plausible" or "generally accepted as consensus" or whatever
>>39199005>saw it form from a volcanic eruption years backBut that isnt a 70 year old rock. It was a rock when it was in the volcano, just in magma form. then it cooled.
https://answersresearchjournal.org/radiometric-dates/biblical-timescale-radiocarbon-dating/
>>39199031It's a fairly well-known experiment, look up the Mount Ngauruhoe samples analyzed by Geochron LaboratoriesThere's also the Mount St Helen one
>>39198086Before becoming an esoteric man, I was a fundamentalist christian for about ten years. I was, sadly, a creationist who thought the world was 6000-10000 years old and, as you might guess, I rejected evolution.Thing is, deep down, "something" inside me always told me I was wrong, and I knew the scientific facts were too many and too solid to be ignored.One day (mostly thanks to a what I can call a supernatural encounter), I just stopped being a Christian and began studying the books of greats sages like Manly Palmer Hall, Helena Blavatsky, Eliphas Levi, Carl Jung and others. Science doesn't seem, in my eyes, to have a conflict with the esoteric/spiritual; sure some militant atheists might claim scientists reject all forms of religion and spirituality, however the scientist community is not 100%, not even close (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9956591/#:~:text=For%20example%2030%E2%80%9339%25%20of,)%20%5B17%2C%2019%5D.)Do I believe in God? I believe in the Primordial Mind (Nous) and in the One of Plotinus. I reject YHWH or Allah, to me these are childish representations of "God".Do I believe in a cyclical universe? Yes, even before science came up with the theory, ancient sages believed in such.Do I believe in Evolution? Yes, yes I do.Is the earth 6000 years old? No, lol.
>>39199084kek. I hope this is satire. If not, you regressed big time
>>39199089>kek. I hope this is satire. If not, you regressed big timeIt's not. Believing in a childish god who gets mad, and who needs Egyptian/Hebrew to calm him down before he kills everyone.That's regressing.
>>39199093This is a sophomoric surface-level reading of the old testament. Unfortunately, people just go for that, don't bother investigating it sincerely, and then go to demonic cults that seem attractive from the outside but are spiritual death. I sincerely doubt you've ever been Christian, or you wouldn't talk about the OT in such a disingenous way
>>39199051Why do you expect the change into igneous rock would alter the carbon amount?
>>39199018Historic record can also go back as far as history has recorded. So things line up with the past 5000 years of human history. You listed one example where one measure doesn't add up that doesn't hold to scrutiny because they literally used other methods to figure out the right date. What's your next example?
>>39199104Sure, when we go away from your crazy religion that means we were never christians to begin with. lolIt's all literal until the creator of the world starts forbidding crippled people from entering holly spaces (Leviticus 21:16–21) or when he asks his followers to kill and enslave women and children (Ezekiel 9: 5-7).Keep your faith, I'll keep my Gnosis.
>>39199123>it's another "muh mean things in Leviticus and in the prophets" argument from a """"former Christian""""Any actual Christian knows how to interpret the old covenant, it's one of the first things your priest tells you during catechism. You're not fooling anyone.Keep your "gnosis" (death), I'll keep the Truth.
>>39199141>As a former true protestant Christian I believe you're not a real christian because you are Catholic, everyone knows Catholics are statue worshipers and call Maria the mother of god, that is forbidden.See how it works? This is what your organized religion teaches.The Bible does have good moral and spiritual ideas, and even some real historical events, however most are allegorical. But we can't consider all of the Torah real, that's insane.I am sorry if I hurt your feelings.
>>39199155>protestantNonsense>most are allegoricalCommon mistake that mostly comes from protestant heresies and vatican 2 nonsense>we can't consider all of the Torah real, that's insane."That's insane" isn't an argumentTo make it short in the off chance you're arguing in good faith and not just a smug frogposter: the entire story of the Bible is about God setting up his plan for human redemption following Adam's sin. The old covenant was about setting up the background "requirement" for the birth of Christ among the israelites, taking into account how primitive people were in that era and tailoring his self-revelation accordingly, then establishing the new covenant when the time was rightIf you have genuine questions I can answer them, otherwise I won't waste any more time on this
>>39199182>The old covenant was about setting up the background "requirement" for the birth of ChristHe caused all that pain and suffering...so He could give the solution to the pain and suffering?He basically broke humanity's leg so they could appreciate this lovely cast and wheelchair He made for them.
>>39199187He didn't cause it, you're being spiteful and don't understand how free will and sin relate to each other.Christ was foreshadowed as early as Genesis 1 for those who bother with serious exegesis, but either way God's plan was put in motion as soon as Adam fell
>>39199197>He didn't cause itThen in what way is He "setting up" the background? The background is all the pain and suffering. Christ is not a savior if there is no pain and suffering to save us from.
>>39199182Look, you're judging me without even knowing me or what I believe. I am sorry, but your organized religions makes no sense. Your god is violent and asks for horrible things like circumcision (before Jesus destroyed the Torah). People were killed in your book and in real life because his rules, like killing homosexuals; and don't give me the BS about "interpretation" because each christian sect interprets the Bible in different ways, why would yours be better?>If you have genuine questions I can answer them, otherwise I won't waste any more time on thisI don't have questions, I know the Bible, I've studied it for 10 years. And I wouldn't ask you because you're an arrogant fundamentalist baboon who would probably be whipped by Jesus himself. Learn something from your canonical gospels, learn how to respect other people and not to judge them. I've met atheists who are more christian than you. It's because people like you that your religion is seen as unfriendly and cold.
>>39199198Again, you don't understand. The "background" is the law and the prophets, not the evil humans do to each other. Christ saves from sin, which made the world fall because Adam chose sin. It's not complicated but you don't want to understand and keep talking utter nonsense, so as I said I won't waste any more time>>39199206Yeah, case in point. God bless you and may you renounce demonism and find Truth.
Organized religion = soul slavery and financial dominationThe Bible is not inerrant. The God of the Bible is not Almighty. Is he Almighty in China, Japan, etc? No.
>>39199206>Christ is not a savior if there is no pain and suffering to save us from.Are you reading what you said? So...god makes us suffer so he can bring a savior to stop that suffering that comes from god? For what? So we can thank god for stopping the suffering he himself caused?This is why I love the Nag-Hammadi texts, you orthodox Christians didn't understand Jesus nor why he came and died.This is ridiculous my dude.
>>39199206>god is evil because he's mean to the LGBTQueerinos>stop judging meKEK
>>39199207Bro, isnt it funny how only Christians think xyz is demons? Did you know it was Christianity that invented demons? Did you know Christianity itself is a syncretic religion of Greek Platonism (Logos), Israelite pagan superstitions, and Mystery schools? Did you know most early Christians believed in reincarnation and didnt even really know the difference between Marcionist gnosticism and the other assemblies until hundreds of years later? Did you know the Apostles did not even like each other? But you believe in a magic holy ghost that magically made the Bible the perfect word of God despite centuries of edits?
>>39198086>there is no actual evidence that the commonly cited religions of mesopotamia predate the Old TestamentPlato's Timaeus/Critias suggests that his mentor went to Egypt and the Egyptian priests there told him of Atlantis/Cataclysms from 10,000 years before his time. The Egyptians were fairly expert record keepers above all.But even if you don't believe that particular tale, you still have to deal with the fact that the Hebrew "God" is really just a syncretism of the local deities like El and YHWH. We definitely do have Sumerian/Egyptian records that predate the deities mentioned in the OT.
>>39199227>lake of fire>second deathFunny how that shit actually comes from Egypt. Watcha doing Christians? Do you think crosses and altars are any less idols than pagans altars? Do you think martyrdom is any different from pagan human sacrifice?
>>39199226>all these statements>not a single one of them true>all of them regurgitated surface level garbage most likely from youtube vids on gnosticism that are easily refuted by anyone with a cursory understanding of philosophy and theologylmao this board is gold, the average IQ here must be in the low nineties
>>39199227Multiple things in the OT were copied from earlier religions, including Noahs flood. The Nephilim that Christards freak out about these days? Literally just foreign kings the Israelites (Canaanites) got their asses kicked by. Christians just replaced pagan gods with angels and demons.
>>39199226Daemons were seen as neutral entities capable of bringing a lot of good things when they became attracted to a human. A good example was Socrates.Some even say Napolean and Alexander the Great were guided by Daemons.Christians just wanted the monopoly of religion, so, as soon as the fourth century came around they decided to kill and destroy all schools of mysteries (they same schools Jesus was initiated on).Let us not forget what these many and courageous Christians did to Hipatia and to the "gnostic" communities.
Well, when the testing range is meant for the billions range, its not surprising. 1 million years is 1/1000th of a billion years, which is the half life of radioactive potassium..Its kind of odd though. It decays into argon, a nobile bass. I would imagine that making "new rock" by pyrolyzizing material into a molten state would offgass any argon trapped inside.pg48w
>>39199234>Funny how that shit actually comes from Egypt. Watcha doing Christians?My religion has continuity with what my ancestors believed through multiple civilization destroying cataclysms.
>>39199235All of them are true, enjoy going to Hell bc you followed the wrong religion according to Catholics, the majority of Christians.
>>39198095>Where are all the graves?There's no graves, because not things decay. There are plant of fossilized remeans of extinct creatures though that lived in very different living conditions from our own.
>>39199247It really doesnt though. What you believe and what 50 Ad Christians believe is not the same. Funny how the earliest complete Bibles cant be dated earlier than 1000 ad, right around the same time the Orthos and Catholics split. You dont even have a canon text that you all agree with. Your faith is NPC brainwashing.
>>39198959You are one of the weak men creating hard times
The idea of an Almighty God who sends the vast majority of humanity to hell for not being in the right fucking cult is excellent marketing for cowards and slaves.
>>39199243>Christians just wanted the monopoly of religion, so, as soon as the fourth century came around they decided to kill and destroy all schools of mysteries (they same schools Jesus was initiated on).The spread of Christianity was an act of cultural genocide.
>>39199243I believe in Bicameral brain theory. Most people back then were schizos and depending on the cult you were in the schizo was either a prophet, a god, or an evil spirit to be murdered. Bc thats how idiot humans work. Christianity doesnt even have consistent soteriology. I reject all of it as delusion.
>>39198086If you look for logical fallacies in "Answers in Genesis" you'll find a slew of them.The most common one they use is misapplication of evidence. Genesis is also very poetic, with historical accounts mixed in. Imagine if I took any author's collection of historical poems as pure truth without proper interpretation and context. How would that shape my worldview? It results in pathological thinking.
>>39199260I didn't tell you what I believed in. I believe what I observe, which is my soul traversing across creation and listening to God as he guides me throughout eternity. None of these religions are as contradictory as you seem to think. Its all human thought grappling with the ineffable divine cosmos and being transformed by it into something that can comprehend and understand the mysteries.
>>39199207>The "background" is the law and the prophetsAll of which is about avoidance of pain and suffering, due to god forcing humans into the world.
>>39199247>My religion has continuityNo it's not, your beliefs nowadays are completely different from the primitive Christians who lived closer to Christ's time.BTW what first century Christian sect are you closer too? The ones who believed the Book of Enoch was canonical? The ones who believed in the Gospel of Thomas? Why is your Christianity superior to the one practiced by primitive Christians who lived before fundamentalist radicals like Eusebius?
>>39199271>The spread of Christianity was an act of cultural genocide.If those mystery schools had been any count you would still remember learning from them the first time around, or you would still be visiting them as a soul in the astral world to uncover their secrets. These are things you do when you tap into Gods power and he gives your soul its inheritance. Because you disbelieve in God, you don't find the mysteries either. What did you think they were there to teach, if not him?
>>39199290>If those mystery schools had been any count you would still remember learning from them the first time around, or you would still be visiting them as a soul in the astral world to uncover their secrets.What are you talking about? The mysteries live on, Masonry, Suphism, Rosicrucian, Eubiotics, Templars and so one, they still exist. We still study the works of Plato (who was an initiated man) and others.You Christians judge us but know nothing about us. LOL the Templars came in contact with Gnostic communities during the crusades and they basically converted.We're alive an well, and yes, the Temple is within just like Jesus (an Initiated man) said.
>>39199242>>39199234None of these things are bad things inherently. It's just that most people that fail to take the argument for God/Intelligent Design and the subtle hints for the underlying "simulated" structure of our universe - whether it's in the Bible or at Giza... or Plato's work.The bottom line is unfortunately that the masses are too stupid to ever truly even BEGIN to understand God. And the ones that are smart enough often use that to their own advantage (Pharisees, Catholic Priests, Freemasons etc).
>>39199287I believe in God. I've met and spoken with Jesus. I am the husband of Sophia from Atlantis.Of the other 'gods', I've met Enki, Sekhmet, Odin, Loki, Ptah, Chronos, Artemis, perhaps some others that I have forgotten.I've seen Gabriel, Uriel, Raphael, Lucifer.And you know what they are to me? They are my family. We are God's children, living through eternity. Some made their claims throughout history, but if they were supreme they would still stand among you and you would not have forgotten them.You want to worship these ancient gods, but you forgot where they came from, and that you came from that same place. My father made me equal to them, and I know them not only on this planet, but on many other planets as well.
>>39199327>You want to worship these ancient gods, but you forgot where they came from, and that you came from that same place. My father made me equal to them, and I know them not only on this planet, but on many other planets as well.I know my dude, I know.
>>39198086>Are young earth creationists rightNo. It is dumb as hell. It requires the assumption that1) God is real2) God wants to fool us with an earth that appears older than it actually is3) Yet is somehow so incompetent to do a half assed job.It projects fallibility on the infallible. The arguments against it are generally reaching by people looking to support their notions. It wasn't something seriously entertained by christianity until relatively recently and even then largely only caught on in america. Because of the kiked bible translations seeking to undermine truth.Radioisotape dating is a good example. I've seen dozens of experiments that debunk it. Each one falls apart by simply reading into it. They always apply an isotope outside of its reliable range. Intentionally for the purpose of misleading people. Evolution does not conflict. Has its flaws. Usually not the ones these guys pretend exist. Will probably be shaken up in time but don't let that partial truth misled you into this stupid shit.There is a lot of evidence. Just sediment layers are evidence. Evidence is subject interpretation and is not truth in itself. A person may judge the evidence as strong or weak. Personally I feel little and less we know of the ancient past is reliable. Humans have been anatomically modern for 200,000 years. Yet civilization is less than a 20th of that age? In the past 10,000 years sea levels have been over 100 meters lower. in 200,000 they have also been 100 meters higher. Few assumptions can be defended.
>>39199337I just like making fun of pagans.
In terms of our lifespans and petty civilizations yes it's young. I dont think isotope dating is accurate as there are incidents where two datings on the same source come back with wildly different estimates and then later retests give an entirely different report. The ancient Egyptians were really good at preserving records and some of their oldest stuff detailed civilizations going back to the dryas period. The best objects preserved to date are the huge stone structures, things that take long long spans of time to erode away. But not much else? If modern civilization I really think all the old religion stories were just history records that were forced to go oral only and then warped by time and exaggeration detailing some incredibly ancient civilization's fall. If our civilization just fell apart and dispersed for death, the bulk of major cities would be reclaimed by nature in a matter of centuries and by a couple thousand years it would be unrecognizable. 20.000 years is definitely long for us but short for this planet and only the most formidable stuff (rocks) would ever last long enough to even hint at the past. Even our satellites would eventually fall down unless they were bound in incredibly high orbits or well between earth-moon; none of our electronic record keeping will even make, and paper does have shelf life even if well preserved.
>>39198717Yeah but that was't the goalpost. The goalpost was moved over here. You see it is still a banana. Nothing can change categories. Categories being defined as groups that don't conflict with my pre conceived notions.
>>39198086If you disprove radiocarbon dating, you disprove all other basis for claims such as E.G. evolution (no age means no time to evolve). Unfortunately, it's also the basis for determining the age of religious documents, a catch-22.There's an easier way to disprove "old earth" though. Go to any beach with fossils on it.You will be told the fossils are from [whatever made up billions or millions of years ago], and that the land took [same bullshit time to erode].Right, but why is the sand made from reinforced rocks worn by ocean currents, well... sand, but the fossils on it are entirely intact and untouched?By their rationale the ground can dissolve in bazillions of years, but not the fossils within them.How does that work? How is fossil stronger than the rock that crushed it? How is fossil intact but all the stones are grains of sand?Once you notice this shit you won't ever unnotice it. And the worst part is... nobody planted the fossils there, so how the fuck did they get there intact when the rest of the shit is sand?
>>39198086>>radioisotope dating was actually proven to be extremely unreliable when a rock that was less than 70 years old was "shown" to be between 0.5 and 2 million years oldSauce? I remember hearing about radio dating being crap as a child, but do not have any precise data points.
>>39199766It's impacted by solar activity and the distance between earth and the sun.>fluctuations in past atmospheric 14C levels have limited the dating precision possible using radiocarbon.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07679-4
>>39198086All of what you said are simply liesIn my country christians think the dinosaurs(the big type not the chicken) went extinct 500 years ago
>>39198118I don't think you know what AI is
>>39198140>The Bible was an oral tradition before anything else,So was everything else. The Illiad isn't much younger than the oldest texts in the Torah>muh carbon dating which is very unreliable.No
>>39199832Notice I didn't use the word AI a single time in my post. What's your point?
>>39199842>What is chatgpt
>>39199851Not AI. I'm sure you're currently thinking you're smart but I guarantee you have no idea what you're talking about so whatever you're about to say, don'tt. actually work in the machine learning field
>>39198086>radioisiotop>sits on the phoneline>refuses upgrade digital>if then whore>what you say
Worser bads.
>>39199858Sure thing mate, sure thing
>>39198086We have gone through multiple eras if humanity/civilisations
>>39200091If you look up the definition of the word "Intelligence" the difference between LLM and AI should be clear. ChatGPT only knows what you feed it. An AI can feed itself.
Because the sumerians were from nibiru evidenced by their different astrological system
>a rock less than 70 years old>came from a planet billions of years oldok bro
>>39199227>The Egyptians were fairly expert record keepers above all.Anyone else think the Pyramids were not made by Egyptians? I find it odd how the Egyptian government doesn't want outsiders to learn more or go deeper into most of the ancient pyramids
>>39198916>youI don't even have an opinion on it I'm not them >>39198813So you lost. Got it
>>39198853Yeah that's true it's behind that paywall as far as i know but i thought all ais are besides like googles shitty one they (mostly) all have those token systems grok is the only one id pay a cent for personally with how retarded and neutered the others are
>>39202007Sorry the thread updated as i clicked and moved Ignore the second part it was intended for >>39198959 this retard who lost
