Anarchists are right, but not in the way you think. See, they seek to have a society that is completely egalitarian, and one of those ways is the destruction of the state. They anticipated what the state was going to devolve into, with all the pedo rings, occult rituals, and backroom deals. However they knew they wouldn't have been able to say anything about it without being seen as schizos so they instead resorted to masking their true intentions behind concepts like "class struggle" and so on. Anarchists have been fighting for our survival since the movement began, but we've just all been too blind to see it.
I thought anarchism was just wishing that people could mind their own fucking business.
>yephttps://soundcloud.com/unc3rtain3r/optimism-ft-blue-pikminie?in=unc3rtain3r/sets/vacuum-decay-part-one
Anarchism leads to spontaneous formation of culture groups which will evolve into state-like entities.
>>39253069There's a philosophy called Esoteric Anarchism which you might be interested in.It's contained in books called Liber Anarkhos and Chronicles of Anarchy on the pirate bay.
Anarchism could be the end goal if we removed the worthless and cultivated natural aristocracy.
>>39253069nuh-uh OP it's actually about class struggle
>>39253069I agree with a free world without regulation by capitalist oversight however my issue is not with the ideology itself but the fact that those who follow it are always trying to conscript others into their way of thinking. For an ideology that opposes the rule of law they sure are intolerant of other ways of thinking, what's the point in opposing that which governs if the ideology is governing the way people think?
>>39256416No. Anarchism only takes you to warlord feudalism.
You mean armchair anarchists.
>>39256586I agree with you as an anarchist.It sadly seems to be the human condition, the ideologies are not the problem, the people are. and this goes for every ideology be they Anarchism or Christianity or Social Darwinism or something else.
>>39256588anarchism takes you down from any unhealthy state situation, whether it's warlord fuedalism or some totalitarian bureaucracy or whatever else it might be, thereby enabling the people to make some kind of state that works for the people, and if that stops working it can be safely taken down too bad states try their best to make organizing outside of them impossible, so people have no choice but to do everything through the state, anarchism is organizing outside of the state whether the state wants it or not, thereby enabling the people to survive without a state, which is what makes it possible to actually work on a healthy state
if you want to see what anarchism would look like just look at how prison gangs operate. the prison population is meant to be egalitarian too in that they are all 'prisoners' yet the thieve's code and power structures exist. whoever has bigger/more guys determines the social contract and how it's enforced in prison. a different power structure always emerges in absence of one. the state might be a bully with its monopoly on force but i'd say paying taxes is better than being ruled by a group of bandits>t. lolbertarian
>>39256825the main event at the prison is that there are wardens and guards that control all the vital resources and have the power to regulate all movements and all interactions, so the only currency the prisoners have is violence it's not emerging in the absence of a power structure, it's the only one that functions with the constant interference from an entirely totalitarian and unresponsive power structure
>>39253069Broski, read Emma Goldman. She was an anarchist and one of the earliest feminists. What she retold was that commies only saw anarchists as stepping stones, children. What does this mean? Jew are not about equality in reality no matter how many times they repeat it. Jews are about the murder of everyone but jews.
>>39254733I call it having a fucking heart that beats
