>>39266730
the names of top secret projects aren't supposed to give hints about the nature of the projects. "immaculate constellation" means nothing

mother fucker

god damnit

ok fine

now ill snap the fingers of my left hand twice
and youll get your angel gf

now

well i did it
now its yr turn

>>39266730
>Did we find angels
They're revealing fallen entities. The time is now. Don't fall for the Antichristian propaganda on X

>>39266871
>Antichristian propaganda
for every atheist on /x/ there's 100 christcucks

>>39266765
In compound/two part cover names the first part of the name usually signifies its part of a larger program.

So there could potentially be something like:

IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION
IMMACULATE CONGREGATION
IMMACULATE CONGLERATION
IMMACULATE COLLECTION

This info could be useful for something like FOIA requests in the future.

File: 1713139355554145.jpg (866 KB, 1336x1149)

866 KB JPG

Zodiac seems linguistically linked to constellation. I think they’re picking the religious/astrological naming scheme because the common mythos amongst ancient cultures is that [sky people] came down to earth and taught them how to read the stars.

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Shellenberger.pdf

>>39266730
It's just another name for Majestic 12 and Zodiac. Same program.

>>39267937
>IMMACULATE CONGLERATION

IMMACULATE CONGLOMERATION*

File: 1709805569996291.jpg (711 KB, 1363x3234)

711 KB JPG

>>39266730
>Did we find angels?

Are we receiving messages of divine origin?