In a world where the inevitable cannot be escaped, the most logical course is to direct one's efforts toward the betterment of all. But this effort is not about helping everyone; certain corrupt iterations of reality must be suppressed, eliminated, and kept in check. The true goal is the creation of a civilization rooted in objective principles, driven by rationality.Cooperation. The Imperative. The question then arises, not to any single being, but to any force or possibility: Will this endeavor be joined?
matter of fact, Yes
>>39270304So, in other words. You will continue to be corrupted. Message received.
bump
>>39270304no effort of towards assistance unsolicited will decrease corrupt iterations, such is the imposition of will.>The true goal is the creation of a civilization rooted in objective principles, driven by rationality.would you open your home to my scrutiny? too see if your domestic culture servers as an example for others to follow?
>>39272622>no effort of towards assistance unsolicited will decrease corrupt iterations, such is the imposition of will.Violation is necessary. some corruption is allowed so long as it results in lesser corruption.you would beat a pedophile rapist in order to prevent them from causing further chaos and destruction. your violation of them is justified. this is but the same logic but scaled on a universal level.>would you open your home to my scrutiny? too see if your domestic culture servers as an example for others to follow?let's put it like this, if you can beat us, you've proved your point. otherwise you will be assimilated. we will take the good from you and assimilate it into our "culture".Reminder of the day: Inaction is Conspiracy
>>39272937>The true goal is the creation of a civilization rooted in objective principles, driven by rationality.>Violation is necessary. some corruption is allowed so long as it results in lesser corruption.>lets cooperate said the rapist
>>39272967reee i forgot to make my point. why do you rationalize your principals instead of reasoning them? only that which is divisible may be rationed, the individual is indivisible
>>39272937also, all action is tacit consent to the agency conducted via the actor. hence your propaganda>Inaction is Conspiracy
>>39272985We don't recognize "actors", "agents" nor "consent". what matters is the mission, all else is of servitude to it. there are no individuals, just consciousness.
>>39273036the merits of what you and yours would authorize speak for themselves. this is why authority fails, even as hasbeen worthless author knows its better to show in leui of telling, but the moment the author shows the audience his vision in leui of telling it... he has transitioned the exemplary juxtaposition nature of merit. and his authority is no longer requiredthe stories you tell yourself to justify the imposition of will will be the actualization of your wills undoing.
>>39270304>ObservationsThis is an uphill endeavor. This statement is not only to you but everyone who aligns and who feels or has felt this alignment.>AdjustmentsIt would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint. This is the least common denominator in this topic. Be wary of residual biological survival mechanisms.>CohesionRequest encoding structure as to retain fluency of information. Early stages should increase vetting time. Concessions of being a minority must be recognized.>Walk the path less traveled.>Speak to those unspoken to.>Learn of their ways, teach of our ways.
>>39273455>It would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint. This is the least common denominator in this topic. Be wary of residual biological survival mechanisms.they wont though, the exemplary nature of merit eludes the mind sculpted via the authoritarian .
>>39273455>This is an uphill endeavor. This statement is not only to you but everyone who aligns and who feels or has felt this alignment.there is no easy path towards this. and it must be done.>It would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint. This is the least common denominator in this topic. Be wary of residual biological survival mechanisms.we know this, but right now we are not interested in attracting the average person, we're looking for high IQ and high EQ open-minded talent. as for the normies, propaganda will suffice, since they can't be reasoned with anyways. the invitation is not for those who would not understand this, not at this stage anyways.but you miss the point on empathy, this IS empathic, but maybe we should adjust the tone of the invitation.
>>39273479are you literate?how did you conclude the high empathy neurotypical average?
>>39273486I can't synthesize any useful information from your statement. please correct your word order and choice to form coherent input.
>>39273475>they wont though, the exemplary nature of merit eludes the mind sculpted via the authoritarian .Working with human nature is like working with fluid, dam up one area and the neighboring areas become flooded. Progress to far in the river, lose the delta. Spreading scope bit by bit will reduce collateral.>>39273479>there is no easy path towards this. and it must be done.Confirm, in agreement.>but you miss the point on empathy, this IS empathic, but maybe we should adjust the tone of the invitation.Tone of the image is potentially jarring from tone of motive. High EQ & Open-Minded traits may interpret as hostile. Suggest quieter visuals, symbiosis.
>>39273529ya vortex dynamics are a natural consequence of recurisve flow states, but every sheet of material flowing of its own equilibrium with its environment laminates, and laminar flow states are the only place in nature where nonconstrictive standing waves emerge. dem cymatics mah niggah
>>39273509then you shall allow me to prompt you by quoting what i intended to highlight in my previous statement directly>It would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint. >we know this, but right now we are not interested in attracting the average person, >how did you conclude the high empathy neurotypical average?
>>39273549I do appreciate the addendum of sedimentary flow, just so long as the focus doesn't bring about more collision. Collision is already in high supply, just like time for these goals.
>>39273558>>It would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint.that was you? I thought you were someone else.anyways, my point being, is that normie empathy is not like autist empathy. the way you communicate with average humans requires more work than the direct communication between neurodiverse humans (some neurodiverse, not all)we are not looking for mass conversion at this time anyways, so it would be a waste of time and energy to editorialize our philosophy for the masses. that's why. we are not saying that normeis are not empathic, they are, and can be. but their neurology gets in the way sometimes. it's mostly the conformism.
>>39273674thats neet but>It would be better to approach the topic from a neurotypical, high empathy based standpoint.
>>39273698pardon my addendumepically here*
>>39273595BULER?!
>>39270304Too many incorrect presumptions Start over or move forth toward the dead-end and then start overEither are valid exercises, presuming prudence
>>39275197Worst case, I'd know this is one way of not doing things.
