[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


all our modern technology and we still cant build them. they defy all known laws of physics.
>>
>>39450662
we can we just don't want to pay for it
>>
no retard, we can build them. but why would you? its just dume rocks stacked on eachother
>>
>>39450733
you literally cant stack rocks that high
>>
A PYRAMID JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE
>>
Bait, gotta be.
>>
>heavy rock on top of heavy rock defy law of physics
Are you just using words to sound smart?because you sound brain damaged
>>
>>39450662
yeah we can retard, thre's just no itnerest in it.
>>
its totally hammer can copper tools

https://youtu.be/QzFMDS6dkWU?t=2945
>>
>>39450662
America built the pyramids in the 40s.
>>
>>39450724
then we'll make the mexicans pay for it
>>
File: pyramid.jpg (389 KB, 1415x943)
389 KB
389 KB JPG
>>39450662
holy fuck the laws of physics just crash landed on the las vegas strip!!
>>
>>39450662
i say we destroy them once and for all
>>
>>39451113
Now do it with just stone.
>>
>>39450662
There's literally a perfect shaped pyramid as a time capsule here in the US. It's not impossible, there's no reason to build one unless some eccentric billion commissions one.
>>
File: luxor-las-vegas.jpg (21 KB, 405x612)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>39451518
Here's the luxor hotel in Vegas, they just changed the tip to glass.
>>
>>39450724
Yeah but what makes you think that was ever different? I don't believe it was built by any known civilization. I don't wanna get Egyptians credit for this clearly alien architecture but what makes you think ancient Egyptian economy or society looked so different to make this project financially possible? Humans build cheap infrastructure. That's all we do. Every structure or building on earth we built was built for extremely cheap to serve a purpose. Some statues, parks, temples to make us a bit happy but not a frocking pyramid. We don't do that
>>
>>39451550
Why aliens, tard. No indicatioin of that, more likely to be an early advanced human civilization that collapsed into savagery later.
>>
>>39450662
Every man made building was built by a rich guy who wanted to make money with it or it was tax payer money to make us less mentally ill = profit. The pyramid was built by aliens. Maybe it was built by humans and aliens together. We don't know why they built it. It's a mystery but we know that humans really really really really like to quit their job and protest.
>>
>>39451558
There is a lot of indication for that. Every monolithic structure in South America. It's all 15000 years old and some of it is technologically impossible for us to build even today.
>>
>>39451614
All of that can be taken to indicate advanced early humans rather than aliens. Ancient aliens is such a goyish dead end of a theory, clearly made to lead astray boomers who had any potential for curiosity.
>>
>>39450662
If you pitch this building project people look at the blueprint and say "let's take all this budget you were planning for the pyramid and instead use it to improve society. No pyramid. Sorry." But then the aliens came and did it with antigravity no problem.
>>
>>39451637
All of these unknown south american peoples who vanished without a trace who built the monoliths were worshipping humanoid gods who walked among them and lived with them and shared knowledge with them. The creators of the nazca mummies. Apparently some structures are astronomic calendars you can date them to 15000 years ago for the calendar to work.
>>
>>39451637
Early humans were very primitive. These monoliths are so rare. Some of the easy ones were just humans who invented some advanced tech like carts, wheels, bronze, cranes and then lost the knowledge. Other structures were aliens. Not advanced humans. Maybe a small community of humans who built it together with aliens. These Aliens only gave us very few monolithic structures but those are pretty easy to spot.
>>
File: EO_Wpe4XsAEPxj_.jpg (104 KB, 712x538)
104 KB
104 KB JPG
>>39450662
>>
>>39451824
it was quite literally white gods who did do it
>>
>>39450662
If it was humans with the technology we had in the 1700s why are these structures not found everywhere on earth? It's because it was built by people from the sky. They had their reasons to do it.
>>
>>39451848
Grey even!
>>
>>39451851
That monolith was builded by monkeys of course. They were conscious even before the monolith enlightened them that's how they built the monolith. They were always conscious of course. That's how they built the monolith.
>>
File: bigonefull-513689490.jpg (194 KB, 1144x804)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
>>39451824
This was in England and we humans don't take credit for it.
>>
File: goj1hjyijv081-4268380329.jpg (265 KB, 1080x1350)
265 KB
265 KB JPG
>>39450662
How did primitive monkeys manage to create this monolith using nothing but bones and sticks? They must have smashed rocks together for so long to get it into this shape. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmX7K8noikE
>>
There is no photographic evidence of the pyramids before the late 1800s.
>>
>>39452015
There were no monkeys on the moon anon and that monolith was buried underground quite a bit.
>>
>>39450662
the fucking mexicans literally did the same thing.
>>
>>39452015
Well we can safely assume that they did in fact build it because it has inscriptions of their king on it written in monkey poop. I'm not risking my prestigious job to challenge this theory.
>>
>>39452029
No they didn't it was aliens. Shut up
>>
>>39452018
We don't need that. We can safely assume it's around 15000 years old built by a freak outsider entity. A freak incident. You understand? Aliens
>>
>>39452018
kek
>>
>>39452040
Ayy lmao
just reincarnate into an alien and build them yourself
All religions teach the same thing [beeeeeep]
>>
File: 1726401743164830.webm (1.21 MB, 480x588)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB WEBM
Just stack rocks on top of rocks?
>>
>>39452072
To build what? A castle? A palace? A gigantic wall? Streets? Houses? Cities? Town squares? Restaurants? Businesses? Parks? Factories? A propaganda statue? Apartment blocks? Anything that wouldn't make everyone quit their job, protest and decapitate the king for wasting taxpayer money?
>>
>>39452102
And back then no one even had to work. You could just build a mud hut, buy a boat, a net and only catch fish for yourself like a 100% autonomous person. No one can stop you. You're fully self reliant. How do you force people like that to build a pyramid? You need like 500.000 people. You're not asking if 10 people are crazy enough to build this for no reason. You're asking 500.000 people. Payed by the government how????? Impossible. Where's the king got his money from? They want food and they wanna do a work where they know this is making the world a better place. People are starving and dying from illness. No money for luxuries not even the king.
>>
>>39452194
Thou tripeth, son of Man. Taxation was low compared to modern day, but in the scarcity of the time, it made feeding yourself difficult.
>>
>>39450662
I have an idea how about all humanitarian aid for developing countries now go towards the construction of a second Giza pyramid in Africa. Our economy and technology is much stronger now so to make it less easy we will make it 3 times bigger. We need 500.000 workers. Who's paying for this? Those 500.000 workers? Who buys them food and pays for their rent and why? Why would anyone agree to this? Anyways great work Africa keep it up. Just make the most outrageous thing ever America is sending you 99999999999999999999999999999$ make this really special
>>
>>39451550
what else are you going to do in sand?
Here's what went down.
The egyptians needed to stimulate their economy.
They knew the best way to do this is to pay people, so that they use their money, which will circulate and keep the economy flowing.
Even if the job is ultimately useless, as long as they're doing something and getting paid for it, it's a job and the economy moves.

We are literally less advanced than egyptians right now because the rich are doing everything in their power to stop the flow of money by mindlessly amassing it.
>>
>>39452072
>ai slop is proof
>>
>>39452275
That doesn't make sense. Every who is making money is supposed to create value. Every rich person owns a business that sold a product which was in high demand. Every worker is helping run businesses. That's where the money comes from. You can't just decide OK half of all Americans now work on the construction of a pyramid. And the other half makes money to pay for this.
>>
>>39452348
Is everyone in this board a facially confused autist who can't tell what a joke is.
>>
>>39452072
Lmao the giants moving 100 ton rocks like a desk, get the fuck outta here with that stupid shit
>>
>>39452360
No, it's full of low iq shit for brains who think they can fuck a ghost
>>
>>39452360
Are you?
>>
>>39452275
How much does it cost to move a 2 ton block from a local stone quarry, shape it into a perfect block using primitive tools and stack it? If I did that at work I'd get fired for it is not profitable but the Egyptians getting payed for that? Why? No profit. No food. No resources. No service. No improvement of society. No customer.
>>
>>39450662
Was the pharaoh worth 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999$ if you adjust for inflation? Like that maniac who wanted to build a city in the shape of a line?
>>
>>39452382
>paid
HAHAHAHA POINT AND LAUGH AT THE FOOL THINKING SLAVES WERE PAID
>>
>>39452424
HOW?! You can literally live alone on a secluded island with a fishing rod. The society gives you nothing nothing you give it nothing.
>>
>>39452424
At that point break out with your slave homies go to the moon and problem solved. You're better off on the moon at that point. Why is there a king? Someone kill him already.
>>
>>39452424
That's actually a really good point. It didn't occur to me. It was 100% slaves all of them.
>>
>>39452465
Do so and that'll be the death of not only you but your family. Your mindset is that of today were they cuddle you. No, you will fucking die because you're a slave and your family too for allowing their retard to disobey their masters orders. You have no clue what true brutality and ruthlessness is.
>>
>>39452488
It was this. https://www.reddit.com/r/NatureIsFuckingLit/s/OcWM10JM5X

Move it move it. It's the kings order. *whip* I was instructed to punish everyone who disobeys the kings order. Build the pyramid.
>>
>>39452500
You only need a slave master and that slave master needs a slave master and that one needs a slave master and suddenly you have everyone building a gigantic pile of rocks without questioning it but you need slaves to make food too.
>>
>>39450662
So the cost for a pyramid is 500.000 slaves, 100.000 heavily armed slave masters. 50.000 slave farmers and fishers making food. Still takes 200 years to build. Were they really cost cutting tho? Really should have used local 0.25 ton blocks and invented mortar it's pretty obvious invention anyone could think of that.
>>
File: 8oeqmeem3b7b1.jpg (112 KB, 1170x1159)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>39450662
>he doesn't know
>>
>>39451637
If you don't believe in ancient aliens what kind of aliens do you believe in? Aliens who only arrived in 1947? Aliens that never arrived? Cause they clearly did arrive, built some pyramids and make the nazca mummies.
>>
>>39452857
Nope ai slop deepfake, only giza exist
>>
>>39450662
You can consider becoming a sceptic once you've become a full on believer but don't be a misinformed naive retard who never looks into this stuff. I'd rather be a crazy alien fanatic.
>>
File: 1732827297734056.jpg (6 KB, 201x251)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>39452996
Skeptic*
>>
>>39450662
When people talk about "the invention of the wheel" they don't mean the concept. Neanderthals understood the concept. They mean an industry and books written about wheels, teachers teaching about wheels in school and mass production. All of the most basic technology was probably invented thousands of times but there was no industry and no encyclopedia
>>
>>39453701
More like invention of woodworking and paved streets. A wood log is just an offroad freight wheel. A sled is a sand wheel. A crane is an antigravity craft.
>>
File: 1721784704301588.jpg (21 KB, 474x347)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>39452945
nta, I would say they're more like watchers than direct interveners while they may have swooped in to save our asses in the past they don't try to interfere too much with our progress as a species.
The pyramids themselves share similar building practices with other areas around the world and I believe are newer than most like the ones in china and peru. But it was clearly a global civilization like we have today which collapsed catastrophically the building practices are just way too similar.
The way they quarried the stone and worked it was much different tech than what we have. They almost softened it like clay and could maintain extremely tight tolerances like one would find in machined metals from a lathe.
>>
Pyramids are concrete garbage.
The roman style buildings though, they are developed through ancient lost means.
>>
>>39453005
Non believers remind me of primitive animals like you try to communicate. It's so indifferent it does nothing. There's no curiosity. It doesn't try to communicate by itself. It's just boring and stupid. Head empty. Stupid idiots. There's some part missing from their brains "yeah no way people from the nearest star systems are visiting us with warp drives. No way there's a galactic federation. Let's not even entertain that thoughts."
>>
>>39453875
Ancient humans didn't have an industry with our advanced tech. Our current technology is still very primitive. We could build some of this stuff now but we have covered the whole earth in buildings. Ancient humans did nothing like that. They were cavemen. Aliens built this stuff together with humans. It was some kind of trade or experiment.
>>
>>39450662
We could colonize mars today in theory but it's pure theory. It's not financially and politically possible. You need to put every human in chains, take their human rights from them, enslave everyone, build a thousand rockets, send them to mars and build a mars base but realistically if you look at mars now and you see a mars base it wasn't us. It was aliens and you wouldn't believe how easy and cheap it was for them to build that base.
>>
>>39450662
Every building on earth was made to make profit. It was built as cheap as possible. Sometimes you gotta build an amazing palace to make profit but you're still making profit so construction cost was very small in relation. We do everything for as cheap as possible. We can build an iPhone in an hour for 15$. A caveman can't do that. Aliens can build a pyramid in a day for 100$. We'll get there eventually. We'll colonize mars for 1$
>>
File: 1703804921341585.jpg (389 KB, 1280x960)
389 KB
389 KB JPG
>>39454042
I'm saying they had a different technology path. I don't see why it has to be aliens who do all the heavy lifting for us.
Humans have been building civilizations for 100,000 years. These ancient monoliths stonehenge,pyramids,peru ruins are at least 15,000 years old. Cavemen were just the remnants of civilizations in certain parts of the world after the massive ecological collapse stemming from a magnetic excursion.
But many monolithic sites are under the ocean due to changing shore lines and tectonic movement. Just as today I don't know the exact figure but most of the worlds population lives on shore lines.
Follow the nubs then you'll finally see.
>>
>>39454062
So we are humans today. What do we need to colonize mars? Antigravity warp drives, free energy and an industry so advanced we can build a mars base for 100$. Let's be reasonable and work on these technologies so our ancestors can go to mars. We're not going to mars with rockets. Now follow this thought process. You're a caveman. How do you build a pyramid? Invent semi trucks, infrastructure, advanced technology, measuring equipment, diesel engines, cranes. Let's work on that. We can build pyramids in 2100. We're not doing it today. Common sense.
>>
>>39454112
I don't believe in different technological path. There's only one path. Every alien civilization has the same history as us. Nature always has one way of doing things. We figured out all the basic stuff today and we have a long way to go. In the year 9000 we can build pyramids on alien planets. They think in different scales.
>>
>>39454198
I guess if you want to completely forgo any physical evidence and just day dream.

There are many types of mouths eyes and noses on this planet they all derive from previous simple versions but all are formed with a specific purpose in how they are used.
There are many ways to crack an egg. Though beginning points and end points look very similar I just can't agree that the journey is linear.
>>
>>39450662
The biggest leaps in technology that lie ahead are antigravity warp drive craft, an entirely automated industry where robots do everything, all automated by AI, free energy, 0 carbon emissions so we don't die out, mass surveillance and a totalitarian communist regime where no one owns anything and everything is controlled by politicians who have our best interest in mind. Everyone gets the same basic quality of life so an apartment in a city, food, health care and a job but no personal freedom. Everyone needs to work together to create this vision. This sounds outrageous but put yourself in the shoes of our visitors.
>>
>>39450662
Every object you own someone had to make. You can do without it. You need 0 objects to survive. There are homeless shelters with food and dorms. They help you get a job. That's what a functioning society looks like. The people who built everything you own could have spent that time and resources building antigravity craft and free energy. That's why we need a totalitarian oppressive government where no one has any rights or personal freedom so the 100 politician councel who control everything can decide how to run this planet, where to invest resources and how to build a new world with no pointless luxuries.
>>
File: space monkey.jpg (439 KB, 798x1367)
439 KB
439 KB JPG
>>39452026
>There were no monkeys on the moon anon
Not until the monkey astronaut program. And that was over sixty years ago.

I'll bet they have a whole city up there now and are sending the drones to New Jersey.
>>
>>39453882
>muh arches
Probably retained the routine of puking after a meal like the romans. Fucking ignorant tard.
>>
>>39450662
>all our modern technology and we still cant build them.
why cant you just get a crane, pick up the stones with the crane, and pile them on top of each other? seems pretty simple...
>>
>>39454770
Where would you place the TRUMP sign?
>>
>>39452945
Nephile is Aramaic for "people from Orion".
The Gizeh plateau has the pyramids arranged in the shape of Orion's belt.
>>
>>39452072
Just cast them lol.
And when you've built the stair steps, use a different mould so you can make Pythagorean triangle blocks.
You can even fucking pump the wet lithopolymer up to the top by hand.
>>
The fact this thread made it past 1 reply is making me seriously question the average IQ of this board.
>>
>>39455563
stupid takes like this make people want to speak against em.
>>
File: 629104.jpg (52 KB, 600x512)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
Damn glownigger went hard on this one...
I recommend you watch "Ancient Apocalypse" on netflix its redpilled and tells you the real deal on our ancient history.
Watch before its taken down because its getting a lot a flak.

Plus you can read some books by Graham Hancock, dudes been researching this stuff all his life and he knows his shit.

You will them understand why we can not build them now. The pyramids that is.
>>
>>39454770
People look at pictures of the pyramids and think its just one big triangle made of rocks.
But if you do your homework, learn what is inside them, the angles, the precision, the internal placement of block weighting 100 tons, you will realize why we cant not duplicate them.

Hint: Graham Hancock
>>
>>39452275
I thought slaves built the pyramids
>>
File: 1669492307026292.jpg (280 KB, 850x336)
280 KB
280 KB JPG
>>39455801
Even if you slaves from Krypton, you still wont be able to replicate them.
It's full of mathematics, perfect angles, laser precision cuts, and hidden doors that to this day we dont know how to open.

Watch this vid and enter the rabbit hole:
https://youtu.be/cm4eUPNo3_8?si=aVs7-7J5w41EJrii
>>
File: 1678915295135920.jpg (69 KB, 720x720)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>39454112
Redpilled
>>
>>39455801
But who built the slaves?
>>
maybe we just don't want to build such inefficient stupid thing
>>
>>39450662
What a waste of space and resources
>>
>>39455850
Doesn't that right lamp look halfway like a plasma arc that's held up by a Tesla coil?
>>
>>39455801
There are records of employment. The "slaves" were contracted and clocked in and out. It was literally a job you got paid for.
>>
>>39450662
Retard moment
>>
>>39456216
They even got fed that special Egyptian beer as part of their pay.
Since when do slaves get paid in alcohol?
>>
File: 1711911932808145.jpg (253 KB, 1024x768)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
>>39455878
It's like leading the blind really.
>>
>>39452102
Well there was gold on it and water inside and some crystals in the granite everywhere. So a power plant/antenna im guessing.
>>
>>39455850
Most of the blocks aren't even uniform and there's places where you can see rubble infill underneath. The coffin in the GP has visible tool marks on the inside. In fact there's enough unfinished features on the pyramids it prompts the question, it is was so easy for them, why leave it undone?
There are no known "hidden doors", just an apparent void or 2 that have yet to be accounted for. Assuming doors assumes they're chambers.
>>
>>39458666
>Most of the blocks aren't even uniform
Wrong
>visible tool marks
From tourist and so called egyptologist
>unfinished features
No such thing
>it is was so easy
No one said it was easy, you are just making shit up
>There are no known "hidden doors"
But there are.
You dont what you are talking about boy.
Go do some research and come back. Read some Graham Hancock
>>
>>39450662
If they really wanted to do something impressive, they would have built those things pointy-side down.
>>
>>39450739
Why not?
>>
>>39458811
But it is impressive.
Even more impressive is the fact that they cant be replicated because we dont have the technology they had.
>>
>>39450739
>great pyramid of Giza: 454 feet tall
Philadelphia City hall building: 548 feet tall
Pyramids are lame
>>
>>39458903
How many bricks in the philly building weight 70 tons?
Will that building still be here 15 thousand years from now?
Yeah, thought so...
>>
I'd love it if some billionaire decided to build a replica of the great pyramid. I've seen estimates at 5 billion dollars. Great, thats not that much for Elon Musk. Fucking try it, see what happens. Best case scenario you end up with a replica of the great pyramid. Worst case scenario you show everyone how absurdly impossible they were to build even given modern technology and then we have a discussion about what the fuck exactly that means...
>>
>>39458903
Philadelphia city hall isn't made of rocks.
>>
>>39451532
It's really painful when you shove it up your ass....but hey...you know....it someone's fetish.
>>
>>39452072
Hats off the the Camera man
>>
>>39452072
If it was that easy there would be pyramids all over the world.
>>
>>39450662
Boring.
Now, if it was upside down, that'd be pretty cool.
>>
>>39459327
There are
>>
>>39459438
Not recent. They cant be duplicated today.
Whats up with all these idiots in this thread badmouthing the pyramids??
Yall need to get on that Graham Hancock shit
>>
File: pyramids-008-720.jpg (117 KB, 720x480)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>39458763
>Wrong
>>
>>39459500
All I said was that there are pyramids all over the world.
Graham Hancock is a drug addicted grifter.
>>
>>39458763
>From tourist and so called egyptologist
....Who just happen to carry around core drills.
>>
>>39458763
>No such thing
>>
>>39459560
They might have left those on purpose as an example of what they were doing not because they were lazy and stopped
>>
>>39459438
Name 1
>>
>>39458763
>No one said it was easy, you are just making shit up

Either they had advanced tech/magic that allowed them to move and work stone with relative ease or they didn't. Make up your mind.

>No one said it was easy, you are just making shit up
Either they had advanced tech/magic that allowed them to move and work stone with relative ease or they didn't. Make up your mind.

>But there are.
>You dont what you are talking about boy.
>Go do some research and come back. Read >some Graham Hancock

I'd get more useful information reading a graham cracker. Nobody has presented any verifiable evidence of any hidden doors in the giza pyramids let alone proof. Nobody. If you have information to the contrary (other than youtube), pony up.
>>
>>39459511
Irrelevant and disingenuous, especially after 15 thousand years of exposure to the elements and vandalism
>>
>>39459551
Nice picture, my Ant friend is sleeping but tomorrow I will ask him to take a look at that!
>>39459560
How do you that isnt the way its supposed to look like?
Are you baiting?
>>
>>39459614
Teotihuacán
>>
>>39459618
>Either they had advanced tech/magic that allowed them to move and work stone with relative ease
Their having the tech is one thing. The actual process being hard or easy is another history.
>Other than youtube
Lmao, you want me to send you an email with the video of the hidden doors?

You need to stop your argument game up, you sound really stupid
>>
>>39457248
>>39455878
explain?
>>
>>39459198
It's made of stone
>>
>>39459584
Right, because people leave buildings unfinished "as an example" all the time. And what a clear and illustrative example it is!

>>39459631
Yep, weathering and vandalism caused a difference of whole feet in length between adjacent blocks, the vandals no doubt prying teach block out, sawing them down to size then cleverly fitting them back together across the whole face of the pyramid.

>>39459646
I'm sure that's what the contractor tried to say too. Guy, come on, you can literally see where got halfway through leveling a block in several places and quit.
>>
>>39459659
But the argument is in essence that it wasn't hard, that they could move and shape rock in virtually no time. If they were "hard", then these arguments fall rather flat.
Did the poor little throat singers have to take breaks so they didn't get laryngitis?

>Lmao, you want me to send you an email with the video of the hidden doors?
A simple link to published reputable source of non-posterior origin would be sufficient. I assume such exist, yes?
>>
>>39459755
That's different from rocks.
>>
>>39459760
It doesn't matter how often it happens or if it ever happened again.
The point is that it can happen.
They obviously built these giant monuments knowing they'd be around for ten thousand and more years.
It's not inconceivable that they'd leave a message about their construction with what you think is unfinished work.
>>
>>39459647
Name another. And try to find one man made this time.
>>
File: 1678047845881350.jpg (67 KB, 600x519)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>39459749
Vibration based tech alters the molecular structure of anything material, allowing to work with it in many different ways.
>>39459760
Doesnt matter how you try to spin it, no one can duplicate the pyramids. It just cant be done. Not with the tech we have.
One stone being one feet in length different than the other doesnt disprove anything. If you knew anything about the subject, you would know the arguments you are making are just plain stupid.
>>
>>39459867
>that they could move and shape rock in virtually no time
The time is irrelevant. Even if you had a million years to do it, you still could not replicate them. Stop dude, you are embarrassing yourself
The argument is they could, we can not.
>>
File: 1711284169929510.png (735 KB, 626x758)
735 KB
735 KB PNG
>>39459749
History pre-greek is a fabrication based on wild guessing and outright hostile claims of blood and soil on lands which already were inhabited and already had ruins on them.

Because people will complain about the wild guessing part the way they date the structures is looking for stuff they can radio carbon date. Well radio carbon dating is inaccurate to begin with but the stuff inside the megaliths do not fit the craftsmanship of the megaliths themselves or the other out of place stone artifacts found in them.

The names on most of the ruins and the hieroglyphs are all graffiti by the kangs of eygpt.
The old kingdom was much more advanced or had more artifacts of whoever was there before them.

But the most important thing one can understand is the building practices shared on multiple continents. This is the biggest red flag and should peak your interest at least a little.
>>
>>39459867
>A simple link to published reputable source
You need all that to look at a door? You trying too hard. I know you think you are smart but you really arent. And you lack on this subject
>>
>>39450662
The faggot that keeps making this shill thread can't even change the image
>>
>>39459877
There again, they did a piss-poor job of it if that was the case. This is some cow tools level of abstrueness here.

>>39459900
It's easy to say that when no one has seriously tried. Even easier to deflect from the fact that anon was caught out in 3 false statements and one unsupported one with coulda woulda's and handwaving.

>>39459926
So you have nothing. Got it.
>>
File: 1650229605724.png (1.55 MB, 620x968)
1.55 MB
1.55 MB PNG
>>39458943
Regardless of the size of stones or how long it'll last, it's far more aesthetically pleasing than a goofy old pyramid. But not a big fan of sandstone or limestone as it erodes much faster than granite or andesite.
>>
File: ModernMegalith.jpg (612 KB, 1866x1018)
612 KB
612 KB JPG
>>39459920
Pic related was built recently by a stone mason who's a big fan of pre-incan megalithic structures. It can still be done today but takes tons of effort, money and is very niche.
t. stone mason
>>
>>39450724
The things we could build
Replicate what they actually did we could not
>>
File: 7th Largest.jpg (548 KB, 2404x991)
548 KB
548 KB JPG
>>39452857
JFC
It's real
Why do Boomers do shit like this
>>
>>39459920
a note on your pic, the egypt one is not a bore hole, it tapes off narrower as it goes deeper and has geometric recesses near the front face of the hole, no rotary tool dose this. its a silicone polymer concrete and what your seeing is the recess of a corroded out metal component that was in the wet concrete mix.
>>
>>39459584
is there any evidence to suggest that what were seeing here is anything more then a relatively recent attempt to reface a long ago defaced prism?
>>
>>39460671
> no rotary tool dose this
They don't?
>>
>>39460685
your focusing on the
>it tapes off narrower as it goes deeper
part, with wood, and carbonsteel tools, lol, but context is relevant
>and has geometric recesses near the front face of the hole, no rotary tool dose this.
no - they dont
>>
>>39460683
I couldn't say if it's original or not.
>>
>>39460695
Why does it have to be one tool?
>>
>>39460702
a moment ago you thought you could use a wedge to bore into stone with out splitting it now you want me to invent a set of tools that can bore a wedge into stone then inscribe angled recesses into the bored out wedge? no, thats insane, they are casting marks.
>>
File: solteranprism.jpg (49 KB, 1151x839)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>39460697
theres some neat angular prism shit that the shape dose in the schumann resonance of the earth if and only if the prism has a laminar smooth face, i would think no its not in a general agreement with >>39459760
>Right, because people leave buildings unfinished "as an example" all the time.
>>
>>39460711
I didn't say anything about a wedge.
Why can't a second tool be used to inscribe on the walls of the hole after boring?
>>
>>39460742
simply be snipping the snoodle then swipping the smoodle thats left over.
>>
>>39460742
you really wanna argue for ancient tool marks with out even getting into the stone hardness vs tool hardness / pressure required to chip instead of cracking said brittle stone? shits ancient tool marks 101 bro
also i dont know if your the same person or some rando jumping in >>39460685 but this picture right here, where no words were said, thats called a wedge.
>>
>>39460671
Interdasting
>>
>>39460827
i shoulda typed tapered, dem first drafts mang, we see more examples of the cast stones in the black basalt paving stones transition to the rough limestone below. do you suppose the whole complex once had basalt paths? id be neat if that were the case but its hard not to read this is another test attempt at making a sufficiently smooth face for a prism
>>
File: fa4.jpg (94 KB, 702x522)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>39460848
look at the fit between the limestone and the basalt
>>
File: casing stones.jpg (103 KB, 801x543)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>39459560
>>39460683
this is not the original facing, this is though
>>
>>39460193
Then if you're a stone mason how do you do this without steel power tools? only bronze and copper.
I am not saying it can't be done with todays tools that's another anon. I'm saying it could not be done with the tools of then.
The one thing I want you to see is the strange nubs and finish on the faces it looks melted like granite concrete.
>>
File: 1728343208967893.jpg (533 KB, 3060x1807)
533 KB
533 KB JPG
>>39461863
I just woke up :p forgot pic
>>
>>39450662
>they defy all known laws of physics.
Such as? Examples?
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHcsJ1sPQQs
>>
File: 1728378743527100.jpg (108 KB, 1200x900)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>>39460671
They still had powertools along with the stone softening techniques it could be polymer but it's just so hard to compare it to anything we have now.
>>
>>39461869
You call this a pyramid?
>>
>>39461863
How do you do this without power tools? tools?
>>
We can make them, and we make significantly better and more complex structures constantly. The Archdiocese Cathedral in New York puts Giza to shame in complexity, scale, and weight of raw material. But your caught up on stacking blocks, something toddlers do every day. "But muh big blox r biggar and hevyer!!!" Like pulleys didn't exist lmao
>>
>>39462434
a compelling argument, however - how dose anyone do This with power tools that dont shatter the stone.
>>
>>39456207
That lamp is a representation of the ascension of your spirit in your vessel.
>>
>>39461863
They may not have had power tools but I think they had mechanical tools (in terms of mechanical movement, not machinery), that helped them with precision carving on a large scale, like quarrying. Or maybe they did have power tools, at the least i think they had something better than just bronze and copper chisels. Pic related
>>
File: _DSC5128.jpg (387 KB, 1200x801)
387 KB
387 KB JPG
>>39462144
the dude withe the marble peen got me looking at cappella sansevero, do you spose if you tore this room apart thered be any uniquly shaped wall sconces that could have once housed metal utilities?
>>
>>39459920
>Well radio carbon dating is inaccurate to begin
not really
>>
>>39450662
>they defy all known laws of physics.
Not a single fucking bit, op, you’re a retard. Pyramids are structurally sound and resilient, they make sense, it’s just stacked rocks with slaves and then a bit of resonant energy technology that makes lightbulbs work in the surrounding 5 mile radius, it’s cool, but not that cool.
>>
>>39462723
Thats true, but radiocarbon dating stone isn't accurate, so other methods of dating have to be used to tell when the stones were worked.
>>
>>39460193
Bitchin. Looks like crab orchard stone.

>>39460671
Tapered and scored marks such as those are identical to marks produced by experimental use of hand-powered core drills.

>>39460683
Resurfacing the entire face would be only slightly less of a task than building the whole thing from scratch.

>>39460774
The picture is labeled exactly as they found it. Reamers are typically fluted but that one appears to be for fine smoothing. Compare and contrast with a tapered screw tap.

>>39460887
The partially smoothed stones are in fact the granite casing stones from the pyramid of menkaure. Yours are the remaining tura limestone from the base of the GP.

>>39462559
I think you missed their point
>>
Has anyone here even SEEN a pyramid? We're arguing over pixels.
>>
File: 1734616077414669.jpg (66 KB, 640x362)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>39462434
This is marble much less brittle stone Michelangelo had steel tools also. The way it's done and the material that is use is my point, It's different it's rough and haphazard yet insanely accurate like a mass produced good. By rough I mean tool marks are visible this isn't the case with art as these thing plates and containers were used in some cases.
>>39462421
It's the process use your brain
>>39462686
Could be but my point is the age and the common quarry and building practices cross continentally. These people had no contact according to mainstream academia. Yet the same markings are all over the world >>39454112 look here
That is from China. it has the same marks as in Peru and Egypt. The megaliths are all made by the same global civilization.
>>39462559
>>39453875
look this is schist you cant smack that with a hammer and get paper thin curves like that.
>>39462675
I agree but and the reason why I believe they had something else than what we have today some process or tech we haven't discovered yet.
>>
>>39450662
>Sees big triangle in the desert
>DUUUDE THERE'S NO WAY PEOPLE COULD'VE DONE THAT IT MUST'VE BEEN AYYS
I'm convinced the ancient aliens shit is an alien psyop to convince humans their own race is terminally retarded and can't do anything.
>>
>>39463442
Just wait until you're arguing about their astral shadows.
>>
>>39455756
Redpilled is code for retardpilled. Graham Hancock is a fucking hack and is discredited by actual knowledge people in the field for good reason, he hasn't dont shit thats worthy of praise. He goes around looking at natural rock formations in the ocean and claiming ancient space aliens mustve done it because humans are just too fucking stupid.

If there's any truth to an ancient aliens hypothesis it is absolutely not going to come from this grifting cocksucker. He only exists to make money off gullible idiots like you who don't understand how much actual work is required to verify archaeology.
>>
File: facading.jpg (333 KB, 1080x1080)
333 KB
333 KB JPG
>>39462766
>>39463497
soo many yous - is this a personal attack?
>Tapered and scored marks such as those are identical to marks produced by experimental use of hand-powered core drills.
show an example of a tapered bore hole in stone with geometric reassesses near the front of the hole.
>Resurfacing the entire face would be only slightly less of a task than building the whole thing from scratch.
only slightly? demonstration pending
>The picture is labeled exactly as they found it. Reamers are typically fluted but that one appears to be for fine smoothing. Compare and contrast with a tapered screw tap.
tell me more about wood working tools in this conversation about stone boring.
>The partially smoothed stones are in fact the granite casing stones from the pyramid of menkaure. Yours are the remaining tura limestone from the base of the GP
i made no comments on their location, only that in the image you quote, original stones are present in the casing in contrast too >>39460683
>I think you missed their point
i think you missed my point
>Yet the same markings are all over the world
ya ive read the progenitor threads. facades on facades mang, see picrel, whos to say when each layer was added. the only comments ive made on that are one example of casing stones that seems newer then the original stone structure
>look this is schist you cant smack that with a hammer and get paper thin curves like that.
>you really wanna argue for ancient tool marks with out even getting into the stone hardness vs tool hardness / pressure required to chip instead of cracking said brittle stone? shits ancient tool marks 101 bro
seriously why do you have such a contrarian hard on for me ><
>>
>>39450662
A toddler could have built the great pyramids if it was strong enough. Might struggle doing a Sphinx though.
>>
File: images (10).jpg (36 KB, 640x480)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>39451113
Neat.
>>
File: 1708267937932132.jpg (197 KB, 1024x768)
197 KB
197 KB JPG
>>39464200
I would be confused too you picked a fight with multiple anons with different opinions that only agree on the hackjob that is modern archeology and wider academic failure.

Ponder the scoops and nubs nothing else matters.
>>
>>39464344
>focus only on the facade
ponderingpikachu.png
>>
>>39464200
What can I say? You said a lot that needed replying to.

>show an example of a tapered bore hole in stone with geometric reassesses near the front of the hole.
Define geometric recesses.

>tell me more about wood working tools in this conversation about stone boring.
One is a metalworking tool but other anon made the basis for comparison clear.

>i made no comments on their location, only that in the image you quote, original stones are present in the casing in contrast too >>39460683
Yes, and in so doing, you cited the picture I posted showing casing stones.

>i think you missed my point
So, Michelangelo used power tools? News to me.
The two comments below this aren't me.
>>
File: red lines in paint.png (1.83 MB, 1280x720)
1.83 MB
1.83 MB PNG
>>39464656
>Define geometric recesses.
did you forget the picture were talking about? do i need to go all red lines in paint? - drills cant do this. also i forgot to type hand drill, show a hand drill in stone making geometric recesses in a tapered bore hole
>One is a metalworking tool but other anon made the basis for comparison clear.
i get sarcasm in text is hard to parse but try boring into a rock with that wood working tool. its an irrelevant comparison to make.
>Yes, and in so doing, you cited the picture I posted showing casing stones.
yes......?
the ones in your image are a different crude material thats unfinished and less weathered. the second one i posted is the same material with the same weathering and a better finish. my point in replying being that its not an original material in your image but a crude failed imitation. whats your point in telling me the location of the images in reply?
>So, Michelangelo used power tools? News to me.
you missed my point
>>
>>39464739
So there were so many features it was hard to tell what you were indicating, in spite of the guy pointing. But,
Abrupt change in diameter suggesting a switch to a different tool size or a repositioning of the tool. Nothing to indicate the recesses were caused by the boring tool itself. In fact, I've never seen those an any other AE drill holes. Info on tube drill evidence with better picture of your recesses, which look considerably less geometric in full profile: (figure 19)
https://antropogenez.ru/drilling/

>try boring into a rock with that wood working tool. its an irrelevant comparison to make.

Perfectly relevant since they were indicating shape, not specific tool .but you're right that it's irrelevant since core drills cover all the bases.
> whats your point in telling me the location of the images in reply?
Two different stone types on two different pyramids and you implied that the ones I posted were not casing stones

>you missed my point
Elaborate.
>>
>>39460193
source on this ?
>>
>>39450662
I reckon I could give it a shot
T. Yamnaya man
>>
File: Untitled.png (368 KB, 423x362)
368 KB
368 KB PNG
>>39450662

You can't make this stuff up: "MrBeast to Rent Ancient Egyptian Pyramids to Explore Parts That No One’s Seen Publicly"

https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/mrbeast-rents-ancient-pyramids-giza-egypt-1234728171/
>>
File: 1036464m.jpg (46 KB, 599x399)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>39465004
Another angle.
>>
File: core-drill.jpg (152 KB, 1200x900)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
>>39465043
Better shot at near original angle.
>>
File: 19__01.jpg (150 KB, 1300x424)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>>39465004
kay so the first post in this silly reply said
>Tapered and scored marks such as those are identical to marks produced by experimental use of hand-powered core drills.
so i asked you to show me an image of a one such experiment with a hand drill, now your linking me back the same hole presently in contention. this is not a modern hand drill experiment. and your linked image makes it look more geometric not less. and in no way demonstrates how the geometric repossesses ive highlighted in red are bored with a hand drill. more over the site you link too says this was used to mount a copper bushing for lifting purposes, no bushings are shown, no lifting is shown, no drill is shown. i think your a chat bot that cant respond beyond the context of one reply
>Two different stone types on two different pyramids and you implied that the ones I posted were not casing stones
i directly said there a later crude attempt at emulating casing stones.
>since core drills cover all the bases.
demonstration pending
>Two different stone types on two different pyramids and you implied that the ones I posted were not casing stones
no i directly stated their a crude emulation of casing stones done at a later time to the original construction
>Elaborate.
it was in the very first post you replied too
>its a silicone polymer concrete
no drilling required at all, make the fitting, pour the stone.
>>
File: not even a sheet of paper.jpg (238 KB, 1152x1080)
238 KB
238 KB JPG
>>39465004
heres one for you, when you were cherry picking though all my posts, you skipped the black basalt ones at giza. so ima ask you directly, do you think any artisan with hand tools, Or power tools would ever be stupid enough to try and carve this black basalt stone to match the rough terrain below? i dont ! that would be insane. i dont much by into main stream history, but i dont think the advanced ancients were insanely stupid either.
>>
>>39465127
>so i asked you to show me an image of a one such experiment with a hand drill

Eh? When? I'm sure if I'm the one linking to YT now you'll never let me hear the end of it. That said, one of Denys Stocks' early demonstrations is up as well as several newer videos from Scientists Against Myths. In addition, Stocks' book details his experiments thoroughly, something I've yet to see for your magical mystery doors.
The site linked above does indeed show (stastic) images of modern experimentally produced cores though.

>no i directly stated their a crude emulation of casing stones done at a later time

Supposition. The finished blocks are anything but crude. Those of the later pyramid of unas even less so though most of what's underneath is crap.

>no drilling required at all, make the fitting, pour the stone.

So now we've veered fully into tartardia territory and this alleged technology (which hasn't been demonstrated for anything except limestone) being available well into the renaissance and beyond. Right.
>>
>>39465330
>Eh? When?
chat bots can only reply to one post , tell me more about my magical mystery doors?
>>39460683 these casing stones are crude >>39460887 these are not, i dont care if you disagree
> tartardia territory and this alleged technology
is this another of your magical mystery doors? ie your trying to veer off into fantastical bullshit
you get to invent magic hand drills but i cant have concrete ><
>>
>>39465212
Protzen demonstrated hand-working interlocking blocks with quartzite pounders for Nova's Secrets of Lost Empires: Inca.
From a technical standpoint, it's a great way to insure they don't shift. It's certainly no more "insane" than any of the other stonework.
>>
>>39465362
No, >>39460683 this (which I didn't post) is unfinished.Picrel is not.

Bow-powered core drills are demonstrated and backed up with published research. Pour-able granite, marble and basalt are not.
>>
>>39465441
>Bow-powered core drills are demonstrated and backed up with published research.
The toolmarks are inconsistent with ones observed in Egypt. They are too narrow and are horizontal whereas the markings on the Egyptian artifacts are angled and are broader.
>>
>>39465441
your pic is partially finished, not finished.
>>
File: ModernMegalith2.jpg (495 KB, 1362x1018)
495 KB
495 KB JPG
>>39465009
Reddit unfortunately, but I follow it for the cool stone masonry stuff.
https://www.reddit.com/r/stonemasonry/s/BhMzuEeuyz
>>
>>39454770
Yeah but who's paying for it. If people see this dictator is using tax payer money to build something useless they kill that dictator and take the money.
>>
>>39450662
Maybe they built it as a warning. We worked so hard to carve these stones. Our king could have made us build paradise metropolis for the same price and labour but instead he did this and no one even rebelled. I still the more likely explanation is aliens built it for 100$ construction cost in 1 day.
>>
>>39450662
The easiest, most likely most plausible explanation for all of these ancient monoliths is simply extraterrestrials built all of it. It's practically impossible to make 200.000 people do something so unbelievably pointless that's not making any profit. No one's getting payed. Everyone is dying from work accidents. It's practically, politically, financially and socially impossible unless it was built by 500.000 unwilling lazy slaves and 100.000 well paid slave masters with torture instruments
>>
File: 000723.png (202 KB, 310x457)
202 KB
202 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>39450662
It's theoretically possible to walk around the earth. You're one self directed person. If you're corrupted you might actually do that and successfully walk around the entire equator but no one has ever done it. No one will ever do it. It would probably takea person decades. It will never happen. If someone claims it it was either fake or it's aliens. Just because it's theoretically possible doesn't mean it's actually possible at all.
>>
>>39466162
An alien could walk around earth in one day really and it would be easy for the alien. If you hear the news someone walked around earth it was an alien. If you hear about a human who did 10000 pushups every single day since he was 6 and now he's 50 would you believe it? If he's telling the truth he's an extraterrestrial being and that's the most normal thing for him to do like for a human it's average walking at least 200 steps a day.
>>
>>39450662
Whoever built these things for them it was a joke. They built this in 10 minutes. I hate egyptians they're so fucking arrogant. They didn't build this. It was aliens. They built it in 10 minutes. It was not a feat for the aliens who built it. They're not proud of it because it was the cheapest and easiest thing ever. Fuck sandniggers.
>>
>>39466147
That's not how kirlian photography works.
>>
>>39466737
>>39466142
Or this.
>>
File: core argument.jpg (249 KB, 1200x690)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>39465458
Baloney.

>>39465541
About time. And I didn't even have to use novocaine.
>>
>>39466801
>About time. And I didn't even have to use novocaine.
triggered much? my point was never that it was finished or unfinished, but to compare the quality of 2 different finishes........ why are you taking a victory lap for your strawman?
>>
>>39467206
>my point was never that it was finished or unfinished, but to compare the quality of 2 different finishes
I...what?!
Dude, whether one is actually finished or not is absolutely relevant to a comparison. It's like saying "well this house all the shingles haven't been nailed on yet is clearly inferior to this one that has".based on that alone.
>>
>>39467553
why do you quote my words where i dont mention you at all and ask what you did?
you seem lost, i was comparing 2 examples of different quality, then you or who ever replied in this chain at that time went on about how complete the work was. when i commented that the one you contrasted to unfinised was only partially finished you or whom ever else replied in this chain that it was tantamount to pulling teeth to get me to admit this, but it was my first comment in regards to the completion of the work, as a reminder, i was comparing the quality of 2 different pieces of work, not commenting on the completion of one partially complete work. there was no difficulty or struggle on your part sufficient to require novacaine in my stating your example is partially complete. still lost?
ps. you dont have to be the poster of the exact image if said images reference the same object. are you even human?
>>
>>39452018
Alright jackass, I'm going to ask this very politely, but when did cameras become advanced enough to be a viable replacement for drawings? What year was it when cameras became actually commercially viable as a form of record keeping, and then what year was it when the use of cameras had become so widespread that everyone had them? Guess when, retard. THE LATE EIGHTEEN HUNDREDS
>>
>>39453882
Bro just stack dirt like in minecraft it's easy.
>>
>>39450662
Who cares
We can build better pyramids now faster and without any mystery at all
>>
The pyramids are just an art piece made from concrete after the Victorian era.
They're not ancient, they're crumbling and falling apart as they are of poor build quality.

The cathedrals & old world buildings are the real ancient buildings.
A lot of these old "tartarian" buildings are spikey, like spikey cathedrals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%A8che_(architecture)
These were used as a power source like Nikola Tesla's visions.
These were used for harvesting static electricity from the air and for telecommunications in general like modern radio towers.
There's a lot of energy in the air, and it moves around on smaller scales than lightning too, so it can be passively gathered as an energy source.
Pine trees are spiky to be more capable of harvesting static electricity from the air than other plants.
>>
File: Wien_Votivkirche_um_1900.jpg (3.25 MB, 2561x3495)
3.25 MB
3.25 MB JPG
>>39467738
based cathedral enjoyer
>>
>>39467738
many such cases bro,
>>39464491
>>39464200
but the artistic facades all seem to be ontop of a layer of stone rubble covering ancient baalbek style petrified logs that served as foundatin for ''grekoroman'' style ruins either erazed to the foundation or ubiquitous founded dubiously
> they're crumbling and falling apart as they are of poor build quality.
technically the silicon polymer concrete used to make the 'limestone' in these examples is actually of a very high quality, it was never intended to weather the downpour of acid rain, ie dissolved sulfur dioxide that results from using the bessemer process to refine iron into steel at industrial levels
>These were used as a power source like Nikola Tesla's visions.
teslas vision wasnt to harvest static electrictiy from the air it was to use a network of locally powered pulsed repeaters to amplify the schumann resonance to the point you could extract a workable amount of power anywhere - generated from the sites that powered the repeaters....... and if your actually into the false history paradigm you know tesla was a syphilitic fraternity mouth piece wtf yo
>These were used for harvesting static electricity from the air and for telecommunications
cant pick one? let me help! you dont harvest static electricity from the air, thats silly, you induce current to flow by connecting the abundance of valence electrons in the water table below the cathedral via and inductive shunt that is the iron bones of the cathedral to the want of valence elections in the atmosphere with a network of antennae connected to the bones.
>There's a lot of energy in the air,
charge differential only has the ability to do work when want is connected with abundance.
>>
>>39450662
yeah we can, theres just no point
>>
>>39450724
Fucking atheists are responsible for us losing these giant magnificent structures all around the world. Utterly soulless cheap replacements nowadays.
>>
we truly cannot achieve the pointy shape with modern tech
>>
>>39468127
We can't do it with lasers rly?
>N0Y8R
>>
I did it! I teleported there! Time does repeat itself. I did it! It was in the future
>>
>>39468058
Stone chess set>
>>
>>39451532
What a demonic place
>>
>>39467591
You basically said "I'm not talking about the finish, I'm talking about the finish". You, and I can only assume it's you, indicated a picture of the unfinished casing (different from the one I posted) and proceeded to suggest that the very fact it was unfinished meant it was a crude imitation, ignoring the fact that it was visibly in the process of being worked down (which is what took forever to get you to admit) as well as the fact that it's in a much harder, more resistant and difficult to work stone.
>>
>>39467719
Not to mention that the oldest photo of the pyramids is from 1859.

>>39467763
Sacsayhuaman is one of the few actually built out of limestone and it shows very little weathering.
>>
>>39469088
A million roads could have built the pyramids we don't have that many toads in one place to do a toads next with human guards scammed like gods from reptile see reptile scam like gods so toads done em. But nah it was me
>>
>>39469088
Like it's a toads nest probably with subordinate humans as human pets
>>
>>39459900
>muh constellation
>>
>>39460509
Bullshit, never seen nothing like that before. Ai slop garbage.
>>
>>39460827
Wow... a hole.
>>
>>39462723
Already debunked, fuckface
>>
>>39466142
>da shape make engry
>thermodynamics, energy cant be created or destroyed
>>
>>39466147
Never proven, fake as fuck. Literal just stack of rocks to make a legacy.
>>
>>39469088
>different from the one I posted
a different image of the same pyramid.....
>which is what took forever to get you to admit
no? i called one crude when contrasting 2 different pyramids, you claimed the crude version was unfinished, i replied partially finished... this didnt take forever it was one post
>basically said "I'm not talking about the finish, I'm talking about the finish"
.....you dont have to paraphrase you can copy past what i said directly
>>>39460683 (You) these casing stones are crude >>39460887 (You) these are not, i dont care if you disagree
but then have to not lie....
>>
>>39469569
Dumbest argument of all time.
>>
>>39452040
What Halo multiplayer map is this?
>>
Itt - heaps of really angry anons, for some reason.
>>
>>39470308
>i called one crude when contrasting 2 different pyramids
Yes, a finished one and an unfinished one. Not a fair comparison.

>you claimed the crude version was unfinished, i replied partially finished
Same difference.

>... this didnt take forever it was one post
...Which took from >>39464200
to >>39465541 to be made.

Bottom line, there is nothing to indicate Menkaure's pyramid was re-faced as asserted per your original statement.
>>
>>39470471
Looks more like an old Hexen map.
>>
>>39450739
you cant tell me what to do you arent my mom
>>
File: GVDyQB_WIAAuSii.jpg (319 KB, 1179x1304)
319 KB
319 KB JPG
>>39458903
So true. This is how you know we live in a reverse clown world, some dusty caveman looking pyramids get called a "Great Wonder" but these beautiful antique buildings that most certainly have just as mysterious origins get no recognition whatsoever. Crazy stuff. Just a bunch of masons worshipping ancient Egypt yet again.
>>
File: 1620350683876.jpg (187 KB, 821x500)
187 KB
187 KB JPG
>>39470293
It's a hole in a star shape drilled into solid stone, anon. I work with stone and no average core drill could make that shape, so it's pretty astonishing if you know what you're looking at.
>>39472479
>just as mysterious origins
You don't give our ancestors enough credit. Back then, building things was form over function and budget wasn't an issue. The pic you posted is ai generated btw.
>>
>>39472479
I'm adding that to my dark fantasy setting. Thanks. "CIties were found, not built." Goes hard.
>>
File: Untitled.png (2.32 MB, 1235x795)
2.32 MB
2.32 MB PNG
>>39450662
>>
>>39472709
https://www.stonestructures.org/html/star-holes.html
>>
>>39472709
You must be a pretty piss poor Mason if you can't drill a hole in stone.
>>
>>39460827
1 center hole and 7 decorative holes is all that is. Not a single straight line. And it's not even symmetrical.
>>
File: 1720980174169562.jpg (65 KB, 680x495)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>39450662
Wrong and we have better mind control towers than the pyramids.
>>
>>39461863
if it was melted why wouldn’t they all make them the same shape and size to fit better?
>>
>>39465028
wow wtf
>>
>>39470288
I wish india was ranged banned. Your post reeks of curry.
>>
>>39465028
>mr. beast
>beast
Anyone who says God doesn't have a sense of humor isn't looking hard enough.
>>
>>39474040
Maybe they didn't use formwork? Or they had to follow the grain of the stone they worked with for the most structural integrity? The reason I'm putting that idea out there is the fine stonework containers found in Egypt where different types of brittle stone was folded in on itself as if it were clay.

I'm looking at places in China, Japan, Peru Bolivia, the pacific islands, eastern Europe not just Egypt they all have the same marks on the stones. These people had no contact yet all built with large multi-ton stones that all have bulbs left over from whatever they were doing to quarry out these massive stones.
>>
>>39451550
Too be fair they had a lot cheaper costs back then because people would do shit for free in the name of religion, that's basically the only reason shit got done.
>>
>>39472364
an apt image title!
>..Which took from >>39464200 (You)
to >>39465541 (You) to be made.
these 2 posts of mine are your endless attempts to get me to admit something? your a disingenuous bull shit artist and no one buying your work. a the small section of smoothed stone in your image, >>39459560,there actually in this same image here >>39460683, do i need to highlight them with red lines in paint? b - my point was about the type of stone, the weather of the stone, AND THE QUALITY OF THE SMOOTHED IE "FINISHED "CASING STONES - even the smoothed one in this example are shit compared to the smoothed casing stones >>39460887
youve been tunel vision focusing on those dozen or so smoothed casing stones in your image.
>Bottom line, there is nothing to indicate Menkaure's pyramid was re-faced as asserted per your original statement.
i actually laughed out loud - its a human joy, youve brought us right back to the beginning
>is there any evidence to suggest that what were seeing here is anything more then a relatively recent attempt to reface a long ago defaced prism?
>stack a million stones, cant finish 2 dozen
>>
File: penis.jpg (72 KB, 800x800)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>39469124
>Sacsayhuaman is one of the few actually built out of limestone and it shows very little weathering.
its falling apart and being held together by wood. because its a 4inch tick facade of 'victorian' era concrete used to deny excavation work to the site up the hill
>>
>>39472709
>You don't give our ancestors enough credit
They allegedly built pic related in TWO YEARS around the turn of the century (1900~) with basic technology from that era. No way, I do not believe they did that. This is from the old world, as is every other Roman looking building they claimed to make. That's why they use the term "founded", they found it. Masons love using sneaky little phrases like that for some reason
>>
>>39474629
>TWO YEARS
>It was constructed over the time span from 1871 to 1901 and includes 700 rooms dedicated for uses of various governmental operations.
They ALWAYS have to lie.
>>
>>39472709
>no average core drill could make that shape
I'm glad they, and I , were much more clever than you.
It isnt one core drilling.
It's 8.
>>
>>39474802
Im thinking of a different one then. I know one of these buildings they literally say took two years.
>>
>>39474294
>these 2 posts of mine are your endless attempts
Ya gotta remember to floss inbetween.

> even the smoothed one in this example are shit compared to the smoothed casing stones

Again _Unfinished_. You're starting to sound like one of those stage-one and done bleevers who think the stones were cut and polished in a single action. You've pointed repeatedly at the side without the smoothed section and called it crude without taking that section into account. The most you can say is they're not all nice identical right trapozoids..

>stack a million stones, cant finish 2 dozen

Didn't =/= can't. You're still continually tap dancing around the fact that these blocks have already been leveled at their interfaces and even the unfinished surface portions have been roughly squared to shape. All this in granite. In case it still needs spelling out, this is almost an order of magnitude more work than your precious smooth and orderly tura limestone casing blocks. (and why you're reduced to " musta been poured")
>>
>>39476013
so no evidence to suggest that what were seeing here is anything more then a relatively recent attempt to reface a long ago defaced prism
thank you for your concession!
>>
>>39474629
They say tasmania was built by one guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lee_Archer
Very greedy credit stealer.
>>
>>39474303
Yeah, I'm sure the abnormal rainfall and series of massive fucking earthquakes have nothing to do with that.

>4inch tick facade of 'victorian' era concrete

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt ans assume that was hyperbole. Same arguments as with ancient "concrete" apply, though I'm interested in what exactly is being "denied". https://www.fertur-travel.com/blog/2024/a-cutting-edge-sacsayhuaman-archaeology-dig-with-teeth/19635/
Still doesn't account for all the non-limestone stonework in Cuzco and elsewhere either..
>>
>>39476013
>guys we totally super duper can finish it we just choose not to after making this giant stack of stones and finishing the section in red only cause we didnt like it anymore
you made this redundant argument some posts back how my image of this pyrimid wasnt the same one you posted so and was some how different but i very intetnionally chose this image because it makes the "finished" section look immensly pathetic, well also highlighing the different stone quality and weather - and! - it exhibitis those wonderful nubs and atypitical bulding you see all over the world in reletivly recent vitorian era concrete alla the pics in >>39464200/>>39464491 ie - a facade ment to stifle inquiry, unless your mister beast ~
ps >>39460887 the stone work in this image is of a remarkably higher quality then >>39459560 this :P
>>
>>39450662
It's a massive fucking waste of time and resources, that's why
>>
>>39474629
>with basic technology from that era.
...Which includes railways, traction engines, steam derricks, mechanical quarrying and carving equipment and early power tools.
For context, it was completed 3 years before the outbreak of WWI.

>>39474802
>They ALWAYS have to lie.
Indeed.
>>
>>39452072
Omg how did you get this video ? Did you use the Chronovisor?
>>
File: r3eyiftkgvj71.jpg (2.78 MB, 2048x4241)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB JPG
>>39476119
nope dead serious! nice article btw, there digging in a trash heap at the bottom of the wall, they found an old mace some pigment and some teeth!, an edge cutting dig indeed. but their not unearthing the geometrically precise foundations on the top of the hill...... the article dosnt even feature an image of them, just some dudes not doing any work in front of those lovely walls
on the subject of silicon polymer concretes, its not just limestone,\ any aggregate held together with silicon crystal formation can be simulated once you know how to catalytically accelerate their growth. this includes granite and standstone too!
>>
>>39476119
also tell me more about this earth quake? the site was hit hard enough that the building on the top but leveled to its foundation with not even a pile of rubble remaining, but the wall survived that just fine?
>>
File: even ze mountians.jpg (683 KB, 1098x1389)
683 KB
683 KB JPG
>>39476119
ps, these same dudes are faking mountians, you earnestly think afew blocks is too much?
>>
File: GKkjZUkWYAAho4E.jpg (86 KB, 900x583)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>39476147
Think of it terms of outgoing vs. incoming presidents. You know whose projects are going to get defunded immediately.

>i very intetnionally chose this image because it makes the "finished" section look immensly pathetic, well also highlighing the different stone quality and weather
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq49DhpVQXM
Dude, come off it. You can't even prove that's weathering and not surfacing left over from the working technique, and limestone is infinitely more vulnerable to weathering than granite.

Oh, and the blocks look all nice and uniform until you view them from the front. Or did weathering and vandals do this too?
>>
>>39476193
...Or from a different section.
>>
>>39476239
You can see in the pic with the bracing they're a liiiiittle bit thicker than 4 in. And what part of
>Muyuqmarka, where a great circular shaped tower once stood atop the temple fortress
Did you not get?
>any aggregate held together with silicon crystal formation can be simulated once you know how to catalytically accelerate their growth. this includes granite and standstone too!
Citation needed.

>also tell me more about this earth quake? the site was hit hard enough that the building on the top but leveled to its foundation with not even a pile of rubble remaining, but the wall survived that just fine?

Were you dropped on your head as a child?
The area has been hit by multiple earthquakes just within the last 5 years. There was a minor quake 200 miles from Cuzco last sunday.

>>39476327
>victorian
>>
>>39465943
they can even make the 'inflated stone' type of aesthetic...
>>
>>39459870
>>39459198
The pyramids aren't made from rocks then.
>>
>>39450662
>defy all known laws of physics
nigga just put rocks on top of rocks
>>
>>39458855
Given enough time and manpower, I think they could be built with the most primitive tools:
>dig a pit the size of the pyramid
>carve stones into cylinders at quarry
>roll stones to site and into place in the pit
>carve stone into square shape as you roll it into position
>clear away earth from around the pyramid
No lifting of any stones required, besides the loose dirt at the site. That could be done with stone picks and shovels, and wheelbarrows and/or buckets.

I'm not saying this is how it was done. Maybe it can be ruled out based on archeological evidence. I'm saying it can be done without alien magic.
>>
File: 1-5b70c51c6c.jpg (78 KB, 904x560)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
Don't have long to post a lengthy reply but just skimming through this thread is so sad.

The amount of shills, bots and idiots trying to dismiss the great pyramid as just a pile of rocks and nothing important is mind blowing. Do not pay attention to them.

The Great pyramid is the Monument (Pillar) of God. It's architect was Enoch (Enki). Built by humans with lost advanced technology. It's measurements are precise and a calendar of the timelines of this reality.

All other pyramids around the world are copies of the Great. Ancient cultures knew the importance of this beautiful structure. It is the exodus point. The gate to the other side. Guarded by the Dog (now sphinx with tiny head). More to say, but have to go.

Follow spirit, connect with source.
>>
File: poured or melted.png (993 KB, 903x678)
993 KB
993 KB PNG
>>39476371
as to the erosion
>technically the silicon polymer concrete used to make the 'limestone' in these examples is actually of a very high quality, it was never intended to weather the downpour of acid rain, ie dissolved sulfur dioxide that results from using the bessemer process to refine iron into steel at industrial levels
but i thought you were in the hand drills and stone carrying camp, why are you posting pics with so much polymer concrete in them now? <.....>
>>
>>39481800
>limestone is infinitely more vulnerable to weathering than granite.
>>
>>39474040
You get harmonic resonance from that.
Differently shaped stones of different sizes don't retain energy anywhere near as much as same shaped same sized stone structures do.
That's why they're still standing.
>>
File: flaking off.jpg (101 KB, 686x386)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>39482506
its not flaking apart though ><
>>
>>39482522
>flaking
>Not virtually melting from acid rain or crumbling from salt crystal precipitation
Also more resistant =/= invulnerable.
>>
>>39450662
> they defy all known laws of physics.
Except for gravity, right?
>>
>>39450662
rock melting acid an mathematics
>>
Pyramids are an energy technology of our one ancient civilization .

These are ancient energy technologies of our ancient civilization closer to us.
>>39458903
>>39472479
>>39474629
>>39467738
>>39467745
>>
File: sarcophagus-saqqara.jpg (126 KB, 1024x682)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>39481584
>The Great pyramid is the Monument (Pillar) of God.
No it isn't. As proven by so called sarcophagus in various pyramids aren't obviously tombs.
They are clearly technological devices of very high level.

Pic related is so called Serapeum of Saqqara , the other so called "tombs" are the same.
Technological devices of very high quality .

Walls there are extremely well polished to microns and are parallel to each other. Means there was some type of energy generator inside.
Obvious to anyone with tech degree that pyramid is an energy generator that resonated some type of energy field (possibly planetary) into some type of receiving device in the middle inside this so called "tomb" or "sarcophagus".
>>
>>39482750
>acid rain
>in Egypt
>>
>>39483113
This reminded me of the claim of the pyramids being a chemical plant or at least the pyramids made a byproduct of hydrochloric acid in the production of electricity. Something about salt buildup on the limestone reinforces this?
>>
>>39483302
Take that up with the other anon who suggested it first but it does rain in egypt from time to time and with beautiful downtown Cairo right next door....
>>
>>39483375
The salt is in the bedrock too though.
>>
>>39483113
man, they need to do experiements on those boxes, try random shit until they find something. why not put someone inside and close the lid? why not use it as a kiln, put stuff inside and vibrated it. we know they have cool acoustics. expose them to a magnetic filed, try to build electric charge on them, etc
they are certainly not a coffin
>>
>>39450662
>we can't build a big rock stack
Speak for yourself...
>>
>>39452072
Wow dude this honestly looks so fucking cool, kinda scares me too it's creepy lol... anyways where can I find more of this stuff, doesn't have to relate to pyramids exactly.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.