I'm a very skeptical gal, I don't believe in ghosts, god, tarot, etc.But I still believe telepathy is a real human ability that we haven't mastered yet.I believe we have the power to send messages to another person through our mind.Questions that make me think are:Do we need to see the person to practice telepathy?Do we need to be open to communicate, like channels?
Yup
https://youtu.be/nKbA2NBZGqo
telepathy is 100% unironically realit's just more subtle than you might expect, and insofar as my experience has shewn, it seems that most people will be somewhat restricted to being able to do so with people they already know and trust on an emotional level
telepathy is the spiritual default. tune into the right channel and you can do telepathy
>judgmental telepathic entities listen carefully to my thoughts and decide to attack me for thoughtcrimethis is bullshit
I don't think you need to see the person, my dad once sent me a telepathic message that I managed to receive even though we were quite far apart. I think it helps if you're close on a personal level, but I reckon you could get it to work with anyone.
>>39648483Ive been practising doing it with my moms 6 dogs for the past 4 months. I take them all out to the woods, before I let them out of the car I visualize the rules for out walk. They don´t give any particular reaction more than eye contact but they follow the rules to a fault. I periodically visualize different commands to them like get closer, come back for a check up or to stop following a trail. So it´s pretty easy with dogs atleast.
>>39648483It probably is real but just way less magical than we typically think. Here's an example: your face has 20 muscles in it. Each one can either be relaxed or contracted. So that's theoretically 2^20, or 1,048,576 possible facial expressions. That's larger than the English language. And if we want to get really granular, the angle of your head, the intensity of the expression, the placement of your hands, etc. means that you could probably communicate an entire universe of thoughts just with body language.Everywhere in the world, we see people using their faces, hands, and bodies to communicate their thoughts. Many of these are universal gestures. This is probably innate. So there is probably an innate ability to understand this body language. If there's a person who's exceptionally good at understanding this, they might be able to "read thoughts."
>>39648770Yeah that's why I was wondering if we need visual contact of the person for it to work. If not, then it's something greater than body language
>>39648780google lsd telepathy
>>39648483>I don't believe in ghosts, god, tarot, etc.And so you'll never understand telepathy. Tarot is primarily regards the understanding of oneself, and through intuition and mystical principles of correspondence (as above so below) leads to a novel understanding of the truth of a situation. This truth, and the power of telepathy itself, are inseparable from God, or at least The Holy Spirit emanation known to Hindus as Aatman. That is where telepathy comes from, not from us directly, but from a higher order presence of awareness. This awareness is us, but it transcends the individual. It's because telepathy transcends the individual that it is not limited by most things that limit us, but it is inherently dependent on the will of God, which we may only beseech.
>>39648483Yes but it’s not like how you think it can be subtle like being able to read some one’s minds through the hidden meanings of there words or it can be as strong as having some one’s thoughts before they do But it’s not like tv and books
>>39648760Yes, because dogs tend to hold love in their spirits. It is through union that we find telepathy, and that only arises with love. For anyone who might dislike religions inherently, consider replacing "God" with transcending love for your personal understanding of what I've said here regarding Him.
>>39648483A man would just say "I'm sceptical". But women and trannies have to say "I'm a sceptical gal" because for some reason your gender is more important to you than what you are saying and you want to draw attention to it.
>>39648941How I like to see it is we are the mirror of god God being the infinite with the finite in it We Being the finite with the infinite in us Which is where creativity and creation comes from the nothing that is everything within you The silence that can’t be given name as name would limit it as when one is this or that they are not all things
>>39648941>>39648986Accessing this is how you access others mind
>>39648985You're make a big deal out of it. Chill
>>39648965As for those who might say that they don't need love to use telepathy, consider them immoral slaves of the left hand path. Their means are also born of love, but it has been corrupted and I'd rather not say more in this context.>>39648986I've long been fond of that depiction. These days I think of it in more precise mathematical/algorithmic terms akin to the tree of life as a recursive function.>>39648993It should be.
>>39648941>noooo you cant do le X because you need le poopoo religion from 3 thousand years ago!>also its not you its something else apart from you. You cant do it yourself. Nevermind why you arent good at it. Dont listen to this bullshit, OP. Power is for everyone. Even the damned. The wicked. The ugly. They shouldnt. But its not inherent. And neither are the religions.
>>39648682psychic warfare training is necessary
>>39649010Love, acceptance. That is definetely needed. But its a different kind of love. Not the crazy one. Its more like a connection, which, at the bottom of it is what love is so nevermind. Its not a "saying" love. Its a "paying attention" love.
>>39648483I've expereince active telepathy while coming off meth with a social worker (no we were not taking meth together, lol)Other times I can hear voices in my head when laying down before going to bed, but sometimes I can do music and actively compose auditory hallucinations.
>>39649026I made a point of saying it's not about the religions: >>39648965>For anyone who might dislike religions inherently, consider replacing "God" with transcending love for your personal understanding of what I've said here regarding Him.The problem with relying on other means is while it gives you more direct control of the process it also leaves you vulnerable to powers beyond your comprehension. That is all need be said on the matter.>>39649035Yes!
>>39648965Please define what Love is.
>>39649053Love is the source of connection, the force that brings things into awareness of each other. It is a fundamental driving force within the process of consciousness itself, which unites all living things.
>>39649066>A rather useless definition. Whatever floats your boat mate.
>>39649122I could get more specific, but then it would lose definition. There's an inherent granularity when describing higher orders of abstraction. Doing so within a lower order of abstraction to a higher degree of relevance requires paradox. Most people would dismiss a definition that contradicts itself though, right? For instance, would you be content if I told you that love is a consciousness will that transcends all life, and love is a human invention specific to each of us? This is a far more accurate description, though still only a fragment of the picture.Which pixels do you think are relevant in this discussion?
>>39648483Telepathy is real, but communicating with non telepaths is a non starter unless you are an expert. Far easier to telepathically communicate with a spiritual intelligence which can respond 24/7/365, and actually knows what the hell is going on. Telepathy is just using the energy of your organs and brain to sense existence, and transmit vibrations to it and listen/see the response.
>>39649168Simplicity>complexity.Once understood it can easily be explained in simple terms. Right now you´re simply regurgitating things you watched on youtube.
>>39648483haven't heard the telepathy tapes yet?>>39648682>judgmental telepathic entitiesthat's why only pneumatics that transcend dualistic matrix get telepathy. judgemental dualism literally prevents telepathy from taking place
>>39649280>Simplicity>complexityRight, which is why I have the simple answer first before explaining it belies hidden complexity. Simplicity is better for communication, but not for understanding. What I've shared I have experienced personally. The understanding I have is always growing. If you have something you think is worth contributing, you have my attention.
>>39649400Love is like humming a melody that you've known for a long time but forgot the words to. Whatever words you invent to match that inner feeling to the melody, it's the same song, but also a new one.
>>39649473Very poetic. If I were to express this sentiment in terms I find familiar it would be something like: Love is a function called infinitely within an unending recursive process, ever seeking the integration of its parent state with its childrens' states. Call me crazy, but I prefer the limiting specificity. It's what leads to emergence.
>>39649526I'm limited by my moment in time, you're limited by your moment in logical structures. Emergence can have different choke points, leading to different fractal results.
>>39649748My understanding started with logic, but it transcends it now. Each logical framework represents a context of influence, and each "choke point" is where one context ends and another begins. Emergence cannot be described mathematically without giving up the idea of a universal context, and it cannot be described subjectively without being an observer capable of witnessing the transition between contexts. In the end though, all logical structure is only constructable structure until you begin trying to transcend orders of abstraction within the recursive process. This is where ambiguity emerges, from the necessarily missing information required by perspective. What is real cannot be constructed within our context of perception. How we emerge from this context is a matter of exploration. So, thank you for joining me in this journey.
>>39648483It is real. I don’t mess with it.
>>39648483Telepathy is 100% real is a a phenomenon which is shared by all living things, plants, animals, fungi, etc. Here are some good videos which provide solid evidence in favor of ESP: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRd0YqY8uRBfn4AgDbGK1VPUsxDq2XDbO
>>39648700I like this but I still think you need a spark thought to synchronize both parties.
https://youtu.be/0qlppHc3-ggTelepathy tapes was great.If it does push us to research RV and TEL further and it reveals that some day we all might have the ability to seamlessly & near instantaneously perceive a person's true nature and intent, along with past deeds, it would be mean the end of corruption in all spheres, more or less( unless they figure a way to hide thought) naturally this is anathema to all the vile scum on this rock, so they'll suppress it tirelessly. Here's hoping ayys or someone can help us along with this endeavour. I'm not blameless, few of us are, but I'd be willing to let people expose me if it meant worse people also become exposed. Plus it would make all relationships, professional & intimate so so very much more certain and contented. Although now that I think on it, short term, there would be a rash of murders globally as untold millions of men discover their wife was hiding that the kid hes raising isn't his lol. Overall once the dust has settled it would usher ina new dawn, presumably for the absolute betterment of humanity and them world. Bring it on boys, a brave new world awaits.
>>39648682Having standards isn't judgemental. They're helping you practice mental hygiene
>>39648483It’s the next natural evolutionary milestone
>>39648549This is 100% correct. Before going on the nobody arc, I practiced telepathy with a friend of mine who lives in Kazakhstan. At some point we began to literally complete each other's sentences on VC regardless of the language barrier. It was a crazy experience.
>>39648483>galNo you're not. Telepathy is real, and so are ghosts, god, tarot and all the other stuff you consider "superstitous". Open your mind, let the Magic™ in
