[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: thisisfine.png (45 KB, 641x682)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
>Reminder that NASA is officially an intelligence agency
>>41562013 (Cross-thread)
>Trackers:
https://theskylive.com/3dsolarsystem?objs=c2025n1
https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=C%2F2025%20N1&view=VOP
>Lightcurve
https://cobs.si/comet/2643/

1.Retrograde orbit aligns within 5° of the ecliptic; probability 0.2%
2.July–Nov 2025: showed a true sunward jet (anti-tail), not a geometric illusion
3.Nucleus mass ≈106× 1I/Oumuamua and 103× 2I/Borisov, moving faster than both; probability <0.1%
4.Arrival timing placed it within tens of millions of km of Mars, Venus, Jupiter and hidden from Earth at perihelion; probability 0.005%
5.Gas plume: far more Ni than Fe (industrial-like Ni alloys) + Ni/CN ratio orders of magnitude above all comets incl. 2I/Borisov; probability <1%
6.Gas plume: only 4% water by mass (vs water-rich comets)
7.Extreme negative polarization, unprecedented; probability <1%
8.Arrival within 9° of the “Wow!” signal; probability 0.6%
9.Near perihelion: brightened faster than any comet and was bluer than the Sun
10.Sunward + anti-solar jets demand unrealistically large surface area to absorb enough sunlight for sublimation
11.Non-gravitational acceleration near perihelion implies ≥13% mass loss, yet imagery shows no breakup
12.Tightly collimated jets hold orientation across ~106 km in multiple solar directions despite measured rotation
13.Perihelion tuned trajectory to pass within 0.5% of Jupiter's Hill Radius

>Oddities:
The IAA SETI post-detection protocols just updated first time in 15 years: arxiv.org/pdf/2510.14506
Many UAP's have been sighted since 3i detection - https://apokalypsis.net/ - ufobattler.com/ - nuforc.org/map/
NASA caught manipulating data on its Solar Observatory website.
FAA updated its air traffic control handbook to include UAP reporting
China Academy of Sciences changes name of Aeronautics Dept. to "School of Interstellar Navigation"
US announces "Genesis Project" with 90-270 day timeline
>>
File: proveitsfake.webm (2.96 MB, 1092x1074)
2.96 MB
2.96 MB WEBM
https://www.youtube.com/@DiegoSanAraujo
https://www.youtube.com/@DobsonianPower
https://www.youtube.com/@TheAngryAstronaut
https://www.youtube.com/@GaleriaDoMeteorito
https://www.youtube.com/@StefanBurns
https://www.youtube.com/@JohnLenardWalson
https://www.youtube.com/@CristinaG
https://www.youtube.com/@RaysAstrophotography
https://www.youtube.com/@ChucksAstrophotography
Avi Loeb: https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
Shiva Meucci: https://medium.com/@ShivaMeucci -dead :(
Cassandra Report
ppl-ai-code-interpreter-files.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/0274d2f11e23ab13023893dab3e53a95/8a829bb5-73c2-4854-8a13-a85751ecd82e/index.html

Original NASA livestream:
https://www.youtube.com/live/A5SUq2eDXg
>>
>>41571841
forgot a title, thread #128; fuck you I'm tired
>>
it's over
>>
File: kim we're so back .jpg (52 KB, 803x1024)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>41571897
>>
>>41571841
TY OP.
New Galeria do Meteorito
https://youtu.be/biEWNfdTkZ0
>>
File: file.webm (109 KB, 463x359)
109 KB
109 KB WEBM
>>41571859
>shit happens
it's probably worth mentioning that numbers less than 10 mean it's getting brighter, or maintaining brightness. which it should not be doing if it's heading to jupiter
do we have any archive links to shivas work?
>>
>>41571917
I've got these
https://archive.is/Q6ytv/image
https://archive.is/p04Ke
>>
New from Ray
https://youtu.be/QDT9cnf-nPw
>>
It's happening again... Aaahhhhhhh!!!!!! I'm panicking!!! It's the HAPPENING!!!!!!
>>
reminder you larping faggots are falling for a 1 person psyop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf9oBlkQQCo
but continue thinking you can sniff out glowies topkek
2 more weeks
>>
File: 12346798755.png (154 KB, 1000x1628)
154 KB
154 KB PNG
>>
File: 1764258886334052.png (898 KB, 1024x1024)
898 KB
898 KB PNG
>>41572006
>>
es una roca
>>
A short from Diego
https://youtu.be/j0dmwakNCqE
>>
>>41572066
chequeado y rocapilidoreado
>>
Livesteam from Diego
https://youtu.be/8Ut1CbPfkSE
>>
File: G6xqP34boAAftPE.jpg (80 KB, 988x677)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
If the true measure of intelligence is the ability to interact coherently with your environment in order to achieve a goal, then C/2025 N1 (3I/ATLAS) just aced the test.
It didn’t randomly drift in.
It executed a precise, uniform non-gravitational acceleration at perihelion (hidden behind the Sun from our view).
That single, perfectly timed push altered its path by exactly the amount needed to thread three close planetary flybys and then graze Jupiter’s Hill sphere to within 0.1 % — a 1-in-25,000 shot without the maneuver.
No recorded natural comet has ever shown this level of sustained, goal-directed coherence with the solar system’s gravitational landscape. The combined probability of all its “coincidences” is measured in tens of decimal places.
In other words: it is interacting with our star system the way a skilled pilot interacts with airspace. Deliberately. Cleanly. Effectively.
And our collective response so far?
“It’s probably just a comet.”
By the only definition of intelligence that actually matters — coherent, purposeful interaction — this object is outperforming most of us right now.
Ignoring that isn’t skepticism.
It’s the least intelligent thing we could possibly do.
Something just walked up to our front door, rang the bell with perfect timing, and we’re still pretending the wind did it.
>>
>>41571841
Thread is not showing in Catalog searches for Atlas

Link to previous thread should be to 127, not 126
>>
Could R2 Swan and 3I/Atlas be the Blue and Red Kachina? Supposedly R2 Swan changes colors like 3I/Atlas.
>>
>>41572257
yeah I kinda fucked this one up. blame turkey coma.it can be listed as a shit one in the pastebin and we'll ensure the next has correct baking.
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (15 KB, 480x360)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
when are these niggas gonna come here already
>>
>>41572303
Not our fault they don't know how to turkey trot
>>
>>41572303
you can literally summon them to you anon, it just requires a certain outlook. I have been unable to do it until recently, and it is quite literally a "peace and love" type situation. go outside. sit down at night. open your mind, and invite them.
>>
>>41571917
You're comparing a body that's apparently rich with volatile compounds to a behavioral model for icy comets and assigning the differences to a change in trajectory when it's behaving as volatile comets would in regard to apparent magnitude after perihelion.

>>41572006
>15 minutes of being a snarky faggot without addressing a single claim made by Loeb
Sorry, I had to stop there.

>>41572195
>That single, perfectly timed push altered its path by exactly the amount needed to thread three close planetary flybys and then graze Jupiter’s Hill sphere to within 0.1 %
It's looking like 0.15% of the Hill radius with a margin of error of about .1% in either direction as of today, but the point stands. If it was a probe trying to disguise itself as a comet to any observer on earth, I don't see that it would do anything differently than it has.

>>41572303
If it were in fact aliens, they didn't swing by to chat or hang out or save humanity from itself.
>>
>>41572319
>If it were in fact aliens, they didn't swing by to chat or hang out or save humanity from itself.

they have plenty of time to do something, and allowing children to burn their hand on the stove AFTER telling them multiple times not to touch it or else it would hurt would be considered good parenting/emergent education by some.

you are smarter than most anons here, and your analytical edge is not blunted by consensus opinion. what are the most stark anomalies to you?
>>
>>41572319
>15 minutes of being a snarky faggot without addressing a single claim made by Loeb
he adresses everything with cited papers, you choose to wear blinders bro, and yes its a long vid, but its a long con
>>
>>41571914
new anomaly: extremely high methanol output, in the absence of water
>>
>>41571841
Soyuz launch pad damaged today:
https://www.spacescout.info/2025/11/soyuz-pad-apparently-damaged-after-successful-launch/

Russia cannot / would not launch to resupply the ISS

No wonder they would see it as a bridge too far and impossible to defend, with Atlass ayys coming in fast
>>
File: file.webm (1.01 MB, 854x480)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB WEBM
>>41572319
>You're comparing a body that's apparently rich with volatile compounds to a behavioral model for icy comets and assigning the differences to a change in trajectory when it's behaving as volatile comets would in regard to apparent magnitude after perihelion.
a rather long winded way of saying comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet comet
>>
>>41572195
>>That single, perfectly timed push altered its path by exactly the amount needed to thread three close planetary flybys and then graze Jupiter’s Hill sphere to within 0.1 %
Constant observed brightness shows our friend Three Eyes is staying a constant distance from the Sun, hence NOT on the way to Jupiter

It follows that the Hill radius stuff is pure BS invented by jew Lie Abov(e) to have the "conspiracy theorists" look at that item, instead of at brightness

National Guard false flag killings (by a CIA contractor) will justify troop deployments be in place for beginning of January when we are likely to run into this funny cometary comet of a cometic nature.
>>
>>41572364
so that's China specifically limited from returning taikonauts and now new launches being impacted. they are organizing our space accessibility based on their desires.
>>
>>41572380
Was just about to ask, doesn't China still have some poor bastards stranded up there?
>>
File: grid1big.jpg (189 KB, 1016x718)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
>>41571031
>Nothing about the Wow! signal indicates that it was intelligent
I agree. But the point I made stands regardless since it's a clear possibility; nothing says it wasn't intelligent either.

>There's an argument to be made that letting an intelligent subject know that it's being observed is unethical behavior.
This is my problem with this line of reasoning; to substantiate it you have to cite anthropocentric ideals
>We treat other great apes like gorillas like that

We already have constant non human activity all over Earth and in space. So the notion that simply appearing is unethical can be outweighed by other factors. Our entire society is quit literally obsessed with the idea of contacting nonhuman entities and has been for arguably thousands of years, plus there's ample evidence we've interacted directly with them in the past. The entire ethics framework is not realistic.
>>
>>41572402
first they had one set of three taikonauts, then they got them back. then there was another set of three. I'm half inclined to believe China is the only country with enough efficiency and nobility in its bearing to be trusted by interstellar visitors, and something came back to earth with them. They are also the most useful entry point to human civilization, as they wouldn't tell anyone if something joined them on planet.
>>
>>41572411
>I'm half inclined to believe China is the only country with enough efficiency and nobility in its bearing
Stopped reading there. CCP is a glorified mob.
>>
>>41572378
>Three Eyes is staying a constant distance from the Sun
But isn't that still a big deal? Like wasn't its original trajectory to go around the sun and then fly away.
>>
>>41572417
american right? When you work in a bauxite mine I will laugh. you dumb fucks have had your two and a half centuries and you encouraged jews with it. get over yourself.
>>
>>41572417
also, every fucking human society has been a glorified mob. are you retarded? history = the victors.
>>
>>41572424
Is it really this easy to smoke out a wumao? Maybe if the party paid more they'd get better quality shills.
>>
>>41572436
nigga, I'm Australian. in 200 years we haven't bred to the point to have a population rivaling African nations, and we're far more advanced. the writing is on the wall. unless you're dating a blonde woman with 10 kids, shut the fuck up about racial issues. Chinese are far better humans than us by simple merit. again, get over yourself.
>>
>>41572420
>isn't that still a big deal?
uhh yes, if it moved onto an orbit around the sun it's loitering, probably for a rendezvous with us
>>
>>41572444
>nigga, I'm Australian
>Chinese are far better humans than us by simple merit
Way too obvious. Guess the party pays for what it gets.
>>
>>41572458
whatever dude. You're sending those posts via Chinese made components, that only got to you because of Chinese logistics. but yeah sure, continue to shit on the literal lifeblood of modern humanity. they're definitely not recording it as aggressively on their side as the Americans are.
>>
>>41571841
Why did you not link the last thread?
>>41565952
>>
>>41572302
>>41572476
read the thread retard
>>
>>41572486
Brother you can fuck up the title, fuck up the body, but at least link the thread afterwards. You had 2 hours to reply with a link like I just did.
Come on. If you're going to fail this badly don't bake.
>>
>>41572409
>nothing says it wasn't intelligent either.
while thats true, its highly unlikely, its short and non repeating, current theory suggests its a GRB (iirc) reflecting off a gas cloud in deep space somewhere
>>
>>41572502
Or the contents of the message would have been altered by repeating the signal. If we interpret the burst as a string, repeating that number changes interpretation.
I'm just offering a counter argument. There is no certainty here. We shouldn't assume we are under a protection protocol, driven by ethics or anything else because there are too many variables. Our governments lying constantly is a big one.
>>
>>41572502
>non repeating
A repeating signal is hardly a measure of intelligence, pulsars are fucking everywhere and do that shit all the time. "Swamp gas in space" is hardly a definitive explanation, and we should be seeing these kinds of signals all over the place if that were the case, clouds of hydrogen aren't anywhere close to being rare.
>>
>>41572515
oh i agree, i wasnt the anon you were replying to, sorry, was just throwing it out there
>>41572518
if youre shooting a message in the dark across vast distances/time, youre going to repeat the message if only to differentiate it from background noise
>we should be seeing these kinds of signals all over the place
multiple have been detected yes, though not as 'strong' as the wow signal, which was by itself pretty damn weak compared to anything terrestial, its not a 'definitive' explanation, lack of further observations really means its speculation, but its really the best we got since its a real world scenario
>>
>>41572378
>National Guard false flag killings (by a CIA contractor)

Retard.

That was just a typical shitskin migrant attack.

deport all shitskins
>>
>reddit spacing - The Thread
>>
>>41572495
alternatively, go fuck yourself faggot. I've baked about 50 of these fucking things, I can fuck one up.
>>
Glowfag here

I am here to confirm to everyone in this thread that 3IA is indeed an alien spacecraft.

I also invite men over to my house to fuck my wife and myself.

Thank you for your attention on this matter.
>>
>>41572560
It's definitely bots. This is what you get when you train bots on reddit.
>>
File: 1648450523569.png (402 KB, 680x966)
402 KB
402 KB PNG
>>41572567
Just accept you made a mistake and that you can do better. There's no need to get emotional. Next time when you mess up just delete and rebake.
>>
>>41572579
I accepted it in my previous posts, you're the nigger who won't shut up about it like a woman. your picrel
>>
>>41572579
Or you could just shut the fuck up and quit your bitching. It's very easy to use the archive and find the last thread if needed.
>>
>>41572595
You didn't post the link after 2 hours. I did your job for you; you're welcome.
>>
>>41572606
>i'm a faggot
we know anon
>>
>>41572601
>It's very easy to use the archive and find the last thread if needed.
Correct, but not this thread. Hence why you need to include the last thread's post # somewhere in this thread.
It's not worth getting upset. I fixed the problem.
>>
>>41572613
3i/atlas general
oh look it was that easy. now shut the fuck up.
>>
>>41572607
You obviously didn't realize you had messed up the continuity as well as the title. It's OK anon. You don't need to dehumanize yourself over it.
>>
>>41572624
go back
>>
>>41572620
That doesn't work. Title searches don't search the body. Hence why the thread # is important; because it's in the body.
You're wrong about that too. But it's OK because I fixed it for you so you can relax.
>>
>>41572634
archive search would work which would be the only thing that matters eventually.
once again, shut the fuck up.
>>
>>41572642
No that's not how archiving works. Title and body are separate fields; you can't search both simultaneously since search fields are boolean operations.
>>
>>41572651
anon, you giving this much of a shit about your prissy addition is womanly. you should have just "fixed" it and left it. I'm not giving you anymore yous after this, because you're assuming other anons are too retarded to locate it and thats insulting. in order to maybe placate you, I will restate that I fucked up. but I couldn't give a shit about your inability to locate info when its readily available as each thread is linked into one another, like a tapestry.
>>
>>41572665
I'm explaining how it works since you clearly don't understand which benefits you and everyone else who follows these threads. Taking it personally is not necessary.
>>
>>41572340
>what are the most stark anomalies to you?
It's trajectory is most interesting, and the anamolous acceleration altering it. It came in very close to Mars, the second planet you'd be interested in if you were looking for life as we know it, and more likely to host simple life that would be harder to detect from a great distance. There would be little risk in passing close to it. Venus is the third, but the conditions needed on its surface for life are very narrow and would be fleeting, modeling would tell you that, and 3I/ATLAS would have had a clear enough picture from its pass to confirm conditions there. It didn't get a good pass at Mercury, but it was close enough to confirm that it's a a scorching hell of rock and iron, which is what anyone would expect from afar. Then it passed behind the sun from our perspective and made a maneuver while out of our view that would suggest a significant change to its mass that we haven't confirmed in order to correct course to hit the very edge of Jupiter's gravitational influence, the arguably fourth most interesting place if you were looking for life. And on its way it's going to pass us, what models would tell them is the holy grail of habitability, at a distance close enough to determine how much of the surface was land and water, what the atmosphere was composed of, which would be a giveaway for a biosphere, and whether there were other biomarkers present like a vegetation red edge, while still just far enough that even an intelligent, technologically advanced planetary species like ourselves wouldn't be able to observe compositional details, surface features or internal structures of a probe to discern it from a comet. The only interesting target it won't hit is Saturn, but it will be able to make broad assumptions about the quality of the moons based on observations from Jupiter's satellites. 4/5 in one pass without giving away that it's a probe to any intelligent observer would be pristine mission planning.
>>
>>41572006
You will never be a real professor
>>
>>41572794
Wouldn't be surprised whatsoever if it's actually him spamming the video in every thread. He's absolutely deranged enough to do that.
>>
>>41572560
>non-shitposts with reddit spacing end after this call out
Hmmmmm
>>
When will we be getting on the ships?
>>
>>41572842
I’ve been thinking about this. Was it a psyop to get the message out to ‘not get on the ships’ because they’d be here to save us from our current situation of Jewish occupation?
>>
>>41572346
I'll try to watch the rest later. Ironic and a little hypocritical that he's making ragebait while calling Loeb a grifter though.

>>41572357
It's interesting and odd. Not really an anomaly in the same way as some of the others in the OP. It hints at exotic composition, which we know, and different conditions for it's formation, but it's not a smoking gun for a technological origin.

>>41572374
I'm not saying it's a comet. I'm saying it's behaving like a volatile comet would in regard to its apparent magnitude at this point in its journey. It could be an exotic interstellar comet, that is a possibility. If it's not, which is also a possibility, I think it's trying very hard to look like it is.

>>41572378
Schizo/larp nonsense. Apparent magnitude =/= trajectory.

>>41572409
>>41572502
There's quite a lot that suggests it's not an intelligent, intentional communication. First and foremost, radio signals encoding information necessarily have structure, the Wow! signal did not. I went through this a couple of threads back, but we can do it again if you'd like.

>>41572409
>anthropocentric ideals
I would disagree that it's anthropocentric, and that any behavior is necessarily anthropocentric just because humans do it. It's scientific. In theory, it's not impossible to become an intelligent, interstellar spacefaring species without something analogous to science, it's just extremely unlikely. Bronze working happened through trial and error, metallurgy happened without atomic theory, complex architecture happened without physics. Trial and error, instinct, intuition can carry you a long way. But it's very difficult to concieve of how advances like electronics, material science, rocketry or energy storage would all come together without abstract thinking and theoretical understanding. I think the only reasonable exception is inheritance.

>We already have constant non human activity all over Earth and in space.
Oh, okay...
>>
>>41572677
Insufferable faggot
And I’m a literal schizophrenic
>>
>>41572935
It's ok to be wrong sometimes anon. That's necessary to learn.
>>
>>41572910
>In theory, it's not impossible to become an intelligent, interstellar spacefaring species without something analogous to science

The comment you replied to was a very specific example of human-primate research protocols so I don't think what you're saying is related.

>Oh, okay...
What is the issue exactly?
>>
>>41572910
>Oh, okay...
Lol your little atheist baby brain is going to be fucking annihilated over these next few years
>>
>>41572515
>the contents of the message would have been altered by repeating the signal.
That's the complete opposite of how you would want to transmit encoded information.

>If we interpret the burst as a string
Then you're seeing patterns where they don't exist.

>>41572518
>A repeating signal is hardly a measure of intelligence
That's true, but the lack of a repeating signal in the case of a supposed intelligent, intentional interstellar communication is evidence of a lack of intelligence. Redundancy is crucial over much, much shorter distances.

>Swamp gas in space" is hardly a definitive explanation
There are tons of possible explanations. A cloud of hydrogen is not one of them. It could even be a terrestrial signal.

>>41572944
>The comment you replied to
That was my comment, I wasn't replying to it, I was replying to the person (presumably you) that said in response that science is anthropocentric.

>was a very specific example of human-primate research protocols
It was an example of what's called the Hawthorne effect in sociology that can be and is broadly applied to life sciences. I gave gorillas as the example because it's the most widely known and applicable because they are among the closest animals to human beings in terms of intelligence. The same happens when you observe people or fish on a coral reef. It's not specific to gorillas. To assume that we are the only species that would notice this effect is the anthropocentric argument.

>What is the issue exactly?
The issue is a lack of evidence.
>>
Has anyone seen that "The Age of Disclosure" yet? Is it just slop?
>>
File: images (5).jpg (17 KB, 557x551)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>The issue is a lack of evidence.
Lol the US government has been telling the world since 2017 that ayys are here but you won't believe it because you have an atheist baby brain
>>
>>41573000
Controlled disclosure slop for normies, designed to push the UFO threat narrative and mass amnesty for the corporate/government UFO cabal so maybe if we're really nice to the murdering human traffickers they'll let us play with a few of their cheaper toys
>>
>>41573000
I let it run on a second monitor whiel gaming. It's just slop and you already know everything it "discloses". I can't believe people still take Lue Elizondo seriously.
>>
>>41573006
Yeah, the US government hasn't disclosed the existence of extraterrestrial life much less their presence on Earth. I'm not playing this game where you just endlessly provoke me with middle school insults instead of supporting anything you claim. Have a nice day.
>>
>>41571841
The remains of the church that hosted the First Council of Nicaea emerged from under water after more than 700 years: https://greekreporter.com/2025/11/25/ancient-roman-basilica-lake-turkey-years-underwater/

This was covered by waters the year that Osman I, the founder of the Ottoman Empire, came to power.

This is an important omen, just like the burning of Notre Dame was in 2019. God is coming back, old-style.

The pope visited, and also dropped the Filioque issue (the "and from the Son" phrase in the Nicene Creed), that has been a major obstacle to Catholic-Orthodox unification since 1095: https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/pope-issues-apostolic-letter-creed-marking-anniversary-nicaea
>>
>>41573044
I have given you a picture of an actual alien spacecraft and you have the gall to pretend like you didn't see it so you can conveniently ignore my point. You seriously do have an atheist baby brain.
>>
The approach it made to our solar system is a very telling clue what this comet is and everything else just confirms it
>>
>>41571841
0.00024% that this is natural occurrence
>>
>>41573062
That's not proven to be an uap
>>
File: file.png (46 KB, 282x265)
46 KB
46 KB PNG
>>41573006
if you watch that video closely you will see it has propellers. it's a drone, it does nothing "ayyylmao"
>>
>>41573000
It's just a boring "UAPs are real". It's fine for normies but it's too long even for me.
>>
>>41573000
>meh
same old same old. i suppose normies might find some use for it, as intended
>>
>>41572990
>said in response that science is anthropocentric.
I never said that... I said assuming human-primate relations work anything like ETI-human relations is anthropocentric.
>It was an example of what's called the Hawthorne effect in sociology that can be and is broadly applied to life sciences
This is my point anon. Making generalizations about laboratory interactions ignores the reality beyond what we control.
You can claim we insulate species against interference but this stops at the lab doors. We don't care at all how primates or any other species observes us in the wild, so the argument that ETI will respect our boundaries because we do the same in the lab to animals is weak at best.

>The issue is a lack of evidence.
That is objectively wrong. The issue is not lack of evidence, it's how we qualify valid evidence. Stigma has a lot to do with that. Emotionality of researchers is also a component. There is infact ample evidence of all kinds of life, native and ET, all over earth that is both non-human and does not fit our classical definitions of life.
>>
>>41572910
>I'll try to watch the rest later.
it's completely not worth the watch, look the youtuber up he's literally a grifter who makes money doing fake "exposes" on people, calling himself a professor when he barely got his BA on the second try then stop.
Youtube personality slop garbage, just like content crew and mh370.
>>
>>41573161
>There's an argument to be made that letting an intelligent subject know that it's being observed is unethical behavior.
>This is my problem with this line of reasoning; to substantiate it you have to cite anthropocentric ideals
It's science. Science isn't anthropocentric. Assuming science would be uniquely human is anthropocentric.

>Making generalizations about laboratory interactions
You didn't read what I said. It's not by any means unique to a laboratory setting

>You can claim we insulate species against interference but this stops at the lab doors.
It doesn't. It's a principle applied to field work with gorillas, for example.

>We don't care at all how primates or any other species observes us in the wild,
We do when we're doing scientific observation.

>the argument that ETI will respect our boundaries because we do the same in the lab to animals is weak at best.
That's what's called a strawman.

>That is objectively wrong.
Great, let's see your objective proof of extraterrestrials and I'll walk you through how and why it's not.
>>
>it turns out to be a comet
>AND it has been augmented by a non human civilization
So do the glows and shills shut up if everyone wins/loses? This is what seems to be the case.
>>
>>41573197
If its discussed in any way after it flies away its a loss for glowies
>>
File: sapiens.jpg (325 KB, 1600x850)
325 KB
325 KB JPG
>>41573190
Ethics is not a cornerstone of science. It's a cornerstone of medicine. We don't protect species in the wild that we do protect in the lab and yes I did read what you said so please don't lie brazenly.
Gorillas in the wild are not protected. Poaching happens, civilization interacts with wild Gorillas all the time. Gorillas are kept in zoos in front of thousands of onlookers on a daily basis. I have no idea why you're lying other than to make a point that's ultimately irrelevant.

Clearly you have confirmation bias against new information so I'm unsure why I should waste my time if you're telling me you will refuse anything I say. Also, the blatant lying is another red flag. I digress.
>>
File: IMG_9082.jpg (147 KB, 1956x1154)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
>>41571841
the light curve looks like the recent advances in ai
>>
>>41573260
>Ethics is not a cornerstone of science
It's not about ethics, it's about collecting data that's not skewed by the effects of observation.

>Gorillas in the wild are not protected.
Yes, they are. They are protected by law and literally by armed guards.

I'm going to end it here. You don't know what you're talking about and you're attacking arguments that you're making for me instead of addressing anything I'm saying. I'm happy to engage in discussion and debate in good faith. That's not what this is.
>>
File: showgirl2.jpg (174 KB, 770x932)
174 KB
174 KB JPG
>>41573321
This is your exact statement which started this conversation:
>There's an argument to be made that letting an intelligent subject know that it's being observed is unethical behavior. We treat other great apes like gorillas like that. A subject that's aware it's being observed also changes it's behavior and spoils the results of observation.

So yes, clearly it's "about ethics" and you are a liar. All of my points are made in good faith and claiming otherwise is another blatant lie.

Gorillas are kept in zoos in front of thousands. They are clearly not being protected against "observation."
Why lie? It doesn't seem worth it.
>>
File: 176420877215205333.jpg (80 KB, 700x768)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>41573190
>>41573260
>>41573321
>>41573329
>>
File: 1747975921701638.jpg (98 KB, 394x573)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>41569821
>implying we dont fly thru the Kerbolar system

>>41569965
I would assume that anything significantly SETI related would have been stored on an hdd someplace. The Anonymous Hacker Known As 4Chan could have gotten in there easily, and dispersed the relevant information to the masses via the interbutts.

>inb4 muh ultra unbreakable encryption n shiet!

People are fuckin lazy anon, just look at that signal leak, the warthunder forums, or more recently the former campbells vp.

>inb4 F.A.Geauxt knows, hes gonna talk on coast2coast!

Not with Snoory he aint. None of those fucks who want and exclusive dont know anything useful, officially. Odds are good the truth is out there, in a forgotten corner of the web someplace. Maybe if Art were around, but Snoory is too busy smelling his own farts to care much

>>41572302
Yeah yeah, blame the food coma... j/k, even the best chefs have days where they just cant cook. Ignore the fag saying his bread isnt perfectly bleached with crust removed and cut into triangles.

>>41572340
>Parenting analogy from anon
>KHV Permavirgin Society Certified

kekkle me jimmies anon, but sometimes crotch goblins gotta learn the hard way.

>>41572444
>trips of truth
Not this time chang, ill steer you to /gif/ and the eternal bug people rekt threads

>>41572495
>>41572936
Woah, look out! We got a badass over here!
YWNBAHB, double nigger. Take you special snowflake gender assumptions somewhere else. Dont fuckin @ me either, fag.

>>41572910
>it's not impossible to become an intelligent, interstellar spacefaring species without something analogous to science

May Allah forgive me for uttering these words: "Warhammer" "Orkz"
QRD: If you believe hard enough, itll just werk.

>>41573115
Still getting a 42.069% chance of genetically engineered catgirls for domestic ownership
>>
>>41573333
fucking checked lmao
>>
>>41573333
Nice quads. I don't have a problem with argument but lying is absolutely contemptable regardless of context. I really want to have a reasonable discussion.
>>
Sup, posting from 3i ATLAS.
We decided not to interact with your world because of the amount of fecal particles in your atmosphere.

Your planet smells like shit.
We'll interact with you, when you fix that.

Thanks.
>>
Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain. And he seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, so that she might not deceive the nations any longer, until the thousand years were ended. After that he must be released for a little while.

Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years.
>>
File: Ecliptics.jpg (1.84 MB, 1920x1080)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB JPG
Another thing since I'm here. OP has demonstrated obvious disdain for common sense conversation. He was told this thread was made improperly which is not a big deal, but the issue is that we have major news on this topic he chose not to address and instead behaved irrationally about unrelated personal issues which goes against the spirit of the general.

We should consider that previously we have had bakes where the OP intentionally broke links and changed language to mislead.
We have seen over the last 24 hours major developments in the 3I/A situation that are not being discussed. We should not assume this is an accident.

Therefore, I am positing baking a proper general focused on this development. Please confirm this is the proper course of action.
>>
>>41573378
>We have seen over the last 24 hours major developments in the 3I/A situation that are not being discussed
What are they?
>>
>>41573391
We learned it's just a comet.
>>
>>41573345
Thats just the indian subcontinent, ayynon. Do us a favor and glass the place on your way by?
>>
>>41573391
The united nations IAWN organization has declared 3I/A subject of a planetary-defense exercise and reclassified it as a non-comet object, applying a new interstellar classification.
>>
>>41573393
then make a thread shitting on 3I/Atlas to counter 3I/Atlas generals
>>
>>41573378
No, you colossal faggot. The sea levels arent rising, its the black hole in your vag sucking in all the damned beaches
>>
>>41573407
They arent blasting it on the news and spreading high res fear kino for the normies. Its a nothingburger.
>>
File: file.png (82 KB, 1463x313)
82 KB
82 KB PNG
>>41573407
>reclassified it as a non-comet object,
Where does it say that? Funny how the first thing they say is it poses no threat
>>
I'm baking now
>>
>>41573443
Wait until this one is done spamming the board with more threads is shit it just muddies the waters
>>
>>41573334
I hope you get one
>>
>>41573443
120 pasta and you're baking? No
>>
>>41573443
Saar do not not redeem the bread
>>
This bread is damaged. No title, no backlink to previous threads.
>oh no muh precious /x/ threads
>>41569339
you'd be nuking this thread, who fucking cares.
>>
General back up, migrate:
>>41573473
>>41573473
>>41573473
>>
>>41573484
Kill yourself, retard.
>>
>>41573484
I don't take imperatives



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.