>It's been 18 years since Lucky Star airedDoes it hold up to today's standards?
I'm halfway through my first watch right now, and I can safely say that yes, it still does.
>>275395266i'm watching a dubbed version on youtube and so far it's pretty FUNwe really had it so good back then weeb sisters..
Magipoka was better but LS models are OK. Do we need a thread every day?
>>275395331*LS >>275395328>streaming inferior qualityWhy admit idiocy?
>>275395361because i don't wanna bother reading subs..
kogomi
>>275395383Torrent it kiddo. There are bluray 1080p releases with dual audio.
>>275395467dude (or dudette) the animation quality isn't that high for it to matter..
>>275395200yes
>>275395200Konata's references are a bit outdate but none of the other characters get them either so it works out
>>275395200It's definitely a product of its time.
>>275395592>>275395644was lucky star truly ahead of its time?
>seinfeld but for weebs
>>275395200today's standards are even shittier than they were back then, so the only way it could not meet them is by not being shitty enough
Tsukasa is thinking.
>>275395200I like how Lucky Star really showed how much fun the staff were having when making it. Something that's impossible in the post-capitalism era of anime.
>>275396475
>>275395200it's better than most things that come out today. people consider it an all-time classic for good reason
If lucky is so good, why isn't the manga still in print?
It's comfy
>>275397093The greatest pleb filter in anime history. Kino innuendo joke too.
>>275396475She's only pretending.
>>275397153It is (apparently)
>>275395200No, lol
>>275396530>post-capitalism era of anime.That's every year after 1950
>>275395200Today's standards don't hold up to Lucky Star
>>275395200Depends wich lucky wud u fug.
>>275395200Always.
>>275395383don't have to read if you learn nihongo
>>275401004ffuckin show ruined anime.
