No AI or race edits.Previous: >>8457508Thread Question: What is your preferred type of bimbo? Silly, bitchy, or ditzy?
So if this thread dies, gets deleted, or the quality goes down the drain. You can always jump aboard on this thread.>>8468487
Follow up extraneous question: What is most essential to still consider the story "bimbofication?">Downgrade/Helpless - She struggles to maintain her former life but it's just too confusing and she'd rather surrender to the pleasures. >New Outlook/Submission - Thanks to mind warping, she's now amenable to all the things you'd like to do to her. >The Bimbo Body - A man's most important sex organ is his eyes, so make your fucktoy work well from step 1. Boobs, Butt, Belly, Blonde, and Brazilian wax. >The Bimbo Lifestyle - Think pink! Makeup, heels, hair, hoops, nails, voice, vapidity! There's also a pollhttps://strawpoll.com/YVyPvvde9gN
>>8468592Really? You had to steal our first post to promote your AI bullshit?
>>8468599You started it by invading my thread first. You don't get to talk shit and then cry when someone hits back.
>>8468607>invading>talk shitI was thanking you for making your thread and reminding you to post 6. Not everyone has malicious intent.
Besides if you had an issue with it you could've just said so.
I see that you deleted your post.>>8468620>>8468625>>Thanks. I was waiting for one of you to make the first movie so I can make the non-AI thread. Just a warning though, your thread may get deleted, and if that happens don't come to ours.I can't stand cowardly people like you who passive-aggressively insult others and then act like a two-faced rat bastard by pretending that they're a nice guy. Your post was dripping with condescension and even you could tell judging by how you deleted it. I’m not interested in playing your games, you’re a prick and I can’t stand you.
>>8468641Also here's the evidence if anyone's wondering.https://desuarchive.org/aco/thread/8468487/#q8468550
>>8468641I deleted it because there was only a few minutes before I wouldn't be able to anymore and you objected to it being in your thread. 20 minutes had gone by without you posting more images and I had indeed been waiting, I thought it'd be fair to warn you. This war is in your mind.
Also kind of funny to call me passive aggressive when you decided to retaliate instead of just asking me to delete it or saying you had a problem with it.
>>8468656Don't gaslight me. You've hated me from the start and if you didn't want it to be a war, then you shouldn't have waltzed up and declared that you're making a new thread.Furthermore, these alternative threads you've been creating have always been an attempt to undermine my threads. There you go again, acting like a two-faced weasel. You're mean when you can get away with it, but nice when someone calls you out.
>>8468672>You've hated me from the start>these alternative threads you've been creating have always been an attempt to undermine my threadsI literally don't know you. I didn't make the last thread. And if anything, how are the AI threads not the "alternatives"? The regular thread has existed for years. Then there were AI/Edit threads a few months ago. A month ago, a regular thread was made specifying "no AI" but then you AI bros posted in it anyway. Then finally we had two separate threads. That has been the timeline. >an attempt to undermine my threads.What's wrong with having two separate threads? I thought that's what was our compromise. You can't force those of us who don't want to see AI to just sit there and take it just because you personally are fine with having both in your thread. That's a very childish expectation. I'm sure people were present in your last thread and they'll be present in your current thread. There is an audience for AI, as baffling as I find it be.
>>8468697>I thought that's what was our compromiseYou broke that compromise when you marched up to my thread and immediately started hoping that my thread was deleted and even in my last thread you threw insults at it. If you would just stay in your lane then I wouldn't be here right now.Basically, I'm fine with pretending that you don't exist but I can't say the same about you. You're the guilty party and everything that has transpired is because you just couldn't give up an opportunity to throw a cheap shot at my thread.
>>8468718>and immediately started hoping that my thread was deletedAgain, that didn't happen. And I didn't post in your last thread. Someone was posting in your last thread, and that's unfortunate. I almost wanted to call them on it but I figured it'd just start more shit, kind of like you're doing now. If you really didn't mind I don't think you'd still be here or so angry. I deleted my posts in your thread. You continue to argue in this one. You can keep going but I will no longer be responding. If anons arrive to start shit in your thread because of this I won't be able to help you.
I like how you can tell Bimboification is a woman's fetish by how the threads will never just shut the fuck up.
The first two chapters of this were pretty great and then it became completely horrible.
There's not even any real resolution. This is basically how it ends.
Are the mods bimbos?
>>8468579Barbie seems nice and approachable, rest looks like the girls who bullied me in highschool.Would form genuine platonic and mutually supportive friendship with barbie and have her help me with girly stuff because in my autism I never learned and there are no hyper feminine women in my friend group.
>>8468579These threads make me hate this fetish because of the constant catty bickering.
>>8470839Perfectly understandable.
>>8470839Tbh, that just makes me hate the threads.
Writing is the superior medium for this fetish. I read Neon Pink recently and was blown away.
>>8468656>See great transformation>Reverse search artist>It's all furry shit:(
>>8472950Nice goth bimbo.Really one of my favorite types....actually now that I think about it, probably actually is my favorite. But the full package of bimbo body, bimbo facial features, slutty bimbo clothes AND tattoos is so rare.This one in particular is a perfect combo.
>>8472069i like the first half of limericks latest stories. the second half...
>>8473583Thank you! Unfortunately those aren't really her 'canon' tattoos. She does have some, but not those in particular. That was just me messing about a bit with some other tattoo overlays.
>>8473321Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. They have two separate Patreon accounts, and unfortunately haven't done that much bimbo stuff yet. But there are two sequences that are at least 20+ pages.
It's always interesting to me when people who are into TF in general also like bimbofication because it feels like its nearly its own separate thing.
Lil' sis and big sis.
>>8474670nice
>>8474177Feels like this is touched up with AI.
>>8474783Nigga, it's already CG?
>>8474783>Render>Use photoshop to airbrush into bimbo-doll perfectionAIslop is bad, but photoshop still exists.This shit isn't uncommon.
>>8474177Dang, based to have a new guy making solid content
I stumbled upon a good kisekae deviantart account called BBGun20. Are there any other detailed creators like him? I've already seen monkeyflipping, golbezguy, BrainwaveDisruptor, etc. the usual big guys.https://www.deviantart.com/bbgun20/art/Request-You-d-look-better-with-a-B-filter-991418094https://www.deviantart.com/bbgun20/art/Biohazardous-Materials-981558240https://www.deviantart.com/bbgun20/art/VR-Misadventures-Milky-Tavern-847097309
>>8468579>>8468594>>8468620>>8468632I have a weird relationship with Fellatrix's art. I dunno what they're like as a person, but they do a ton of stuff I really like - but then stuff like>>8468625>>8468629or any of their other fetishes like smegma or cucking or hyperdetailed cellulite that I just find kinda gross/offputting, is evenly mixed throughout, or else they do something I like but find SOME WAY to push it too far and suck the appeal out of it.If I were slightly more retarded, I'd swear it was some kind of aversion-therapy psyop, but I don't spend NEARLY that much time on /pol/, so I just kinda have to shrug and say it's weird that it came together this way.
>>8475621I think that's how a lot of people feel about Fellatrix's art. On this website, at least. Personally, I don't mind most of it. I didn't like the futa initially but I kind of do now. The only stuff that really bothers me is the extreme femdom with Valentina (which is a shame, I think she's one of his hottest characters) and the shit with that redhead loli. He's also been doing really weird shota stuff lately. The earlier shota stuff was cool but now he's sort of sexualing the shota itself and its really gross. >cuckingIt's funny you say this though. He hasn't really done cuckold outside of that one Samus set.
>>8468664This is the most underrated genre right here. "Unwilling but coping."
>>8475662Yeah, maybe that wasn't the best word to pick - but outside of certain moods/contexts I don't generally go for the "meaner", more degrading elements he does.
>>8475830It's gonzo grossout shit from the same family tree as Shad and JLullaby, but somehow more maximalist.
I adjusted my goth bimbo and she got a nerf. Still a pair of fakies, just smaller and different shape. I'll use her former size/shape on a future bimbo character!
>>8468664I like this. It's funny.
We used to discuss stories in these threads.
>>8487843What stories would you like to discuss? Any new ones popped up?
>>8488169Honestly, I'm very behind on even checking for new stuff. I've been trying to work my way through the classics because I feel like I've mostly stuck to Limerick, Cristina Prince, and Kris P. Kreme.
>>8490840
>>8490841
>>8490844
>>8490847
>>8490849
>>8494181
>>8477911How do you go about adjust, adding piercings, ect stuff? And what settings will you use for rendering? I was messing around with the pumps Maddie model for a bit but got stuck where piercings would distort while moving the mouth ect.
>>8468579>No AIBased
>>8474940Oh thank fuck, a picture that isn't dogshit.
A story idea, a young lady allows herself brief vacations from the stress of life. She takes her magic thing sets a timer and bimbos out, basically changing appearance and mind. The trouble comes in dealing with the object,she might clock out from work and set it to go off for her three day weekend only to get a text right before the change that she's needed for a meeting, now barbie is struggling to fit into Sammy's clothes and remember all the important business stuff for the meeting. Or Sam comes back from a wild weekend only to find herself naked in the middle of nowhere with no memory of how they got there.Maybe a bit of weirdness inverts things Barbie is in Sam's body and Sam is in Barbie's
>>8470839It's honestly pretty on-brand for bimbos to be like this though. It's oddly fitting. [spoiler]Maybe those anons are undergoing bimboification as they type[/spoiler]
>>8468643Fuck I shot such a sticky load to this. More of her/the characters in>>8468579? Are they from something?
storytime. kind of.
We doing storytimes?
>>8501592
>>8501595
>>8501597
>>8501599
>>8501600
>>8501602
>>8501605
>>8501607
>>8501610
The guy in the AI inclusive thread really thinks we're competing huh
>>8501253Does she actually get fucked ever, or is this the end of it?
>>8502650There's a Chapter 2 and an Epilogue. She gets fucked in both. But imo neither are as good as Chapter 1. Here's a PDF of the whole thing.https://litter.catbox.moe/hb6ui1.pdf
>>8468579I like the silly and ditzy which is why I don't come to these threads much. The over-top whorishness, proportions, and TF is distasteful but I don't know if enough people feel the same way as I do to warrant making a splinter thread. I just want a vapid, dumb but kind girl with a stereotypical look. Not a cockdemon.>>8468579>>8468620>Le "goth" girl brainrot infects even bimbo fetishI hope it eventually starts killing people.>>8468594That is to say, more Barbies, less everything else.But I digress. Just trying to scope out the feelings of the thread.
>>8468656melaniafication
>>8507607I swear, literally every thread someone comes in and says "I don't like the plastic surgery or the brain drain or the TF or such and such". Hell, even the /co/ bimbo thread has the same thing where people keep saying "I like the innocent ditzes but not the sexed up plastic surgery retards"There is literally nothing stopping you from posting the bimbos you do like. If there's any reason why these bimbo threads ultimately die, it's not because of AI art or whatever, but because of people continuously arguing over what does and does not constitute a bimbo.
>>8507902>literally every thread someone comes in and says "I don't like the plastic surgery or the brain drain or the TF or such and such">There is literally nothing stopping you from posting the bimbos you do like.I think the point is they don't want to see what they consider the "bad" type of bimbo at all. He mentioned making a separate thread and in the /co/ threads any mention of a non-bubbly non-natural bimbo is either shut down or receives very little attention, if any. You'd think in 20 years of bimbo threads at some point at least one of these guys would've recognized they're the majority.
>>8475621My thoughts exactly.
>>8508968I think part of the issue is that a majority of bimbo art and bimbofication art is on the plastic retard side and not so much on the innocent ditz side. It also doesn't help that a lot of artists draw girls with big tits and wide hips and big booties by default, making their proportions even more inflated. That being said, I think it's more paramount to find and post the bimbos you do like and just ignore the bimbos you don't.
>>8509638I think its a matter of degree when it comes to intelligence some want Elle Wood from Legally Blonde where they're smart but pretty with a valley girl kind of accent and some want a girl two points away from a blow up doll. Personally I prefer the happy valley girl kind of mindset. After the sex you'd like to have something approaching a conversation.
>>8507902>>8508968>>8509638I don't understand, does that just means I should go to /co/ or is there a mutual understanding that there is a split? Because these threads kind of feel like picking from table scraps in regards to what I want. Also, what's with the new thread?>>8509968>Every possible variant of Spiderman exists right now except this
Has Queen Dagmar been bimbofied ever?
>>8510481Schinkn's stuff is hot visually but he almost always leaves the girls with a lisp speaking in third person, which is a massive turn off and lazy as hell. I understand it's probably difficult to write intelligence loss but this nigga defaults to unga bunga caveman speech and has them wind up nearly completely brainless EVERY TIME.
>>8509638>I think part of the issue is that a majority of bimbo art and bimbofication art is on the plastic retard side and not so much on the innocent ditz side.It's not that that's not true but if that's the issue, how was that anon gonna start a separate thread? >That being said, I think it's more paramount to find and post the bimbos you do like and just ignore the bimbos you don't.Anons ignoring things they don't like? Don't think we'll see that in this lifetime. But I agree this would be a preferable outcome. Cause just imagining the bullshit delineation annoys me. 4chan has a lot of influence when it comes to Western porn and how things go. And there a lot of stupid people in this world. I remember when the venus threads on /d/ first begun and now xxx has a "venus_body" tag which is utterly superfluous, like most of the tags on that website now. I can imagine a scenario happening where someone started making "ditz" threads as an alternative to "bimbo" and that becomes a thing, then suddenly all these sites have a "ditz" tag where all the bimbo content goes instead of the "bimbo" tag and eventually people start putting the plastic slutty whore bimbos under the "ditz" tag so it was all pointless anyway. It's stupid, so it'd happen.>It also doesn't help that a lot of artists draw girls with big tits and wide hips and big booties by default, making their proportions even more inflated.Don't understand the relevance of this but I agree it is annoying.
>>8510286>I don't understand, does that just means I should go to /co/ or is there a mutual understanding that there is a split?>Because these threads kind of feel like picking from table scraps in regards to what I want. >Also, what's with the new thread?There is a split. Whether that matters or not is up to you. It seems to matter to the hordes of anons that have entered every bimbo thread for the past two decades to tell us they don't like IQ loss, plastic surgery, trannies, etc. So there are a lot of people who feel the way you do. You can even look in old forums and see the same sentiment expressed. But, evidently, those of us who do like the plastic whore thing are the only ones who actually post images in these threads, go figure. You can go to /co/, you can start your own thread, or you can post the bimbos you do like here. The choice is yours.Personally, I like almost every kind of bimbo so I find the idea of a split ridiculous. And these threads could use some diversity anyway. But I'm aware not everyone likes all types of bimbos and we're on 4chan so we find it hard not to complain or ignore the things we don't like. Maybe this was inevitable though. There's stuff out there but generally silly, ditzy, and natural isn't what you find under the "bimbo" tag. As for why there's two threads, well, it's a superficially similar situation. After AI bimbo "art" was spammed in a thread they had "no AI" in the OP there was a forced split, but there's also drama because the AIanon doesn't want to just make an "AI bimbo general," he wants AI to be allowed in regular threads and sees the existence of a separate thread as competition. It's a kind of dumb lose-lose situation. The AI stuff is really popular with some anons but also really unpopular with others. His refusal to just make an AI-only bimbo thread and have it be an even split just leaves both threads floundering.
For continuity, imagine there's also a wall of text here.
>>8511647>As for why there's two threads, well, it's a superficially similar situation. After AI bimbo "art" was spammed in a thread they had "no AI" in the OP there was a forced split, but there's also drama because the AIanon doesn't want to just make an "AI bimbo general," he wants AI to be allowed in regular threads and sees the existence of a separate thread as competition. It's a kind of dumb lose-lose situation. The AI stuff is really popular with some anons but also really unpopular with others. His refusal to just make an AI-only bimbo thread and have it be an even split just leaves both threads floundering.I'm not going to let you cast me as the villain of the story. Here's what really happened. The Bimbofication threads were long in decline and one day they timed out and died from inactivity.https://desuarchive.org/aco/thread/8139926/This created a new type of bimbofication thread where AI was allowed unfortunately a few anons just couldn't stand that AI art was succeeding and ran off to /d/ to create their own splinter thread. https://desuarchive.org/aco/thread/8165913/https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11017200/However, one day an anon forgot to create a continuation of the Bimbo/pit threads, which allowed the /d/ rejects to place a no /ai/ rule. Which was complete bullshit, by the way, and would attack anyone who posted ai in their threads. I of course, found it complete bullshit and posted my own thread. However, they couldn't stand it and then posted their own thread split in spite.https://desuarchive.org/aco/thread/8394344/#8394344You anti-AI anons have been the cause behind the splits since the very beginning and I'm not going to stand by and let you rewrite history. You were the ones who made it a competition.
>>8511720jesus christ dude. i don't care. you keep trying to make this a competition or act like i have something against you personally. i don't care about you. there are no heroes or villains and nobody's out to get you.>You anti-AI anons have been the cause behind the splitsnowhere in that post did i imply we weren't. >Which was complete bullshit, by the way, and would attack anyone who posted ai in their threads.it was a single thread. and you were "attacked" because "no AI" was in the OP but you posted it anyway when there was obviously anti-AI sentiment. if there are some of us who are extremely opposed to AI, why should we kowtow to you just because you because you personally aren't? does that make any sense to you? genuinely asking, do you think that makes any sense? you're the only person who's mad that there's two threads. i can't fathom what your end game could possibly be, do you just want to force us to be okay with the AI stuff? is that what you want?
>>8511720>Not liking cludged together mishmashes of different styles is “rewriting history”NTA, but pal, I don’t like the shit you dig. To me, it looks like shit, and I don’t want to see you crowing on about it being the hottest thing around because it feels less like you’re doing art for fun and more like your advertising. Get it through your thick skull: if this split didn’t happen, I would be in your thread telling everyone in it that your garbage looks like garbage, and there would be even more arguments about people being more disruptive than normal. Now go back to your thread so your fans can verbally fellate you about your genius ability to get a computer to do jack-off art for you.
>>8511781First things first. I wasn't the one who posted the AI images in that thread. It was Ultspd, which you would know if you were on his discord. Additionally, the only reason why there's a no-Ai rule in the OP was because people like you placed it there after AI had been proven to be successful in previous bimbo threads. Don't act like Ultspd was breaking some immutable law that had existed forever. The anti-Ai rule had only existed for one thread and as I've shown earlier, there were a lot of people who approved the usage of AI in bimbofication. You guys were gatekeepers trying to remove people who enjoyed the fetish in a way you didn't approve of, and Ultspd was right to ignore your bullshit arbitrary rules.Second, you implied that I was the reason why your thread was floundering and thus you made me the scapegoat for this thread's failures. I simply pointed out that anons like you were behind the thread split and thus I wasn't the one to blame.You blamed me for why your thread was slow and made me out as a villain for not just creating an AI-only thread. I never wanted to just create an AI-only thread and wanted a thread where there weren't arbitrary restrictions placed by a bunch of elitist circle-jerkers. I wouldn't be here if you had spoken the truth about why there were two threads active.
I feel there's nothing inherently wrong with saying AI is wrong. Lets run down the list of its prosIt produces content quickly>it does so by polluting and taking from artists without their consent.It lets people without any artistic talent produce art.>Were it actually art you still wouldn't have produced anything. The only barrier to producing art is one that is self inflicting.It lets handicap people make art.>Handicap people were making art long before this and its still not art.Your production is unethical and your argument is based on desire alone. You act entitled to exist among people who put in the effort to produce content then get upset when your not treated as equal.
>>8511873Where'd you get all your points from twitter? People have explained doesn't of times that there's no difference between a machine learning and humans using references to create art. In fact, if you did some digging, you'd learn that AI's are practically primitive brains using the same mechanisms we used to dream in order to create art. But I know how this'll end. You'll ignore all the points I make because you're stuck in your ways and are looking for an excuse to insult and vilify people for creating art in a manner you don't approve of. Same way "artists" used to shit on people for taking photos, using Photoshop or playing recorded music. I'm not interested in going around in circles with you.Also, by the way, your name is extraordinarily pretentious. You're not the doom of anyone.
I've leaving now. I've defended myself against the slander thrown at me and explained my point of view.
>>8511885Nifty Lets run it down. Without citation the machine learning is apparently equal to primitive brains (its not). People vilified and insulted photoshop and photography and record music. Yeah digital art had its failings both in how it was used and how people responded to it. No one working photoshop cried that they have to use copywritten work to use it, people found a way to make their own artwork with it and the people that obviously used others artwork were vilified because we had some common sense to see that what they were doing was wrong.Photography now that's an interesting one I was thinking about, you can't press the button on the camera and produce content there's a myriad of little things posing lighting composition the kind of lens your using all these little things that made Photography its own art style. But AI generated content has no understanding of any of those things. It doesn't know why a line is placed where it is, why colors were used in a certain way it takes someone else's piece and makes a rough collage to pass off as its own creation.There I acknowledged your "points" while you assumed I took mine from twitter. Enjoy being limited in your abilities.
Jesus christ these threads are the absolute worst.
Noticing a distinct lack of bimbos on a lot of these recent posts.You guys keep fighting over the same dumb shit every time and then wonder why these threads keep dying.
>>8512819>You guys keep fighting over the same dumb shit every time and then wonder why these threads keep dying.I'm not sure that's the only reason but, yeah, I've decided I probably shouldn't respond to that AI anon again. There's no point.
>>8511647>>8512182>>8512819>>8512840Sorry, I didn't mean to reignite old flames, I don't come around often. I just thought I'd offer my two cents.
>>8513396Now you have become the bimbo.
>>8513396If you're the fluffy bimbo anon that was asking about /co/, don't sweat it. I'll take the blame for ever even interacting with that other anon in the first place. When this thread goes I'll let someone else (with more sense) make the next one.
I've gone out of my way to accumulate so much bimbo art but these threads have gotten so divisive I hardly post any of it. Feels like tastes have definitely skewed more conservative.
>>8514478
>>8514480
bimbofication is the answer to all questions
>>8524278
>>8523387So hot!
this is less of a bimbo thread and more of a transformation oneits trash
>>8530227christ is all you people know how to do is complain?
>>8468579silly and ditzy are my go-to bimbos
cute bimbos > slutty bimbo
