File: 1734718898237577.png (2.49 MB, 1344x1728)

2.49 MB PNG

Request Anchor

(probably no need for this, since you can just reply to the specific caption-maker you'd like to deliver your request, but some people still requested into the void, so may as well put this here)

File: 00777-1603360756.png (2.54 MB, 1152x2016)

2.54 MB PNG

edit #63. original from /slop/ on the /trash/ board of a wordfiltered imageboard. non-wordfiltered part of the source link:
.moe/trash/res/40.html#10324

apparently this character ("renge" from "blue archive") is supposed to have a horn, but there's not really anything i can do about that

it was my mistake suggesting in parentheses in the request anchor that "caption-makers" are the only people who can post content in this thread; sorry. i didn't originally plan on posting a request anchor, so i didn't think that through. obviously any original content that includes dialogue or storytelling is welcome

recording that "gaussian blur" video example for the OP made me realize that there was no reason i had to keep making the same mistake i explained at 0:52 that i willingly kept making for the sake of standardization. so i stopped making it, and reduced the "gaussian blur" "stroke" (outline) layers i use from three (3) total to two (2) total, to compensate for it appearing a lot darker (and being slightly bigger) from no longer being partially obscured

i'm kind of running low on stuff to caption. i personally only caption ai-generated images, since i consider genners infinitely more approachable (unless they have a small-ish enough following on twitter that i assume they'll notice me quote retweeting them shoehorning a gratuitous fetish caption onto a completely vanilla gen on my zero-follower account), and i am super bad with procrastinating, so idk if i will ever be arsed to browse old >>>/d/ddg threads looking for new gens. i could always actually bother trying to edit-in smegma again (which that and pee is my main passion), but it's so stressful for me to try with no drawing skill that i'm still procrastinating about it. i still have a skin tone edit i've been procrastinating about putting time into doing, too. so i guess i'll just kinda flounder-around until i hit a wall of having literal NOTHING i'm inspired to caption, then idk what i'd do

File: 20250914_075309_gimp-3.mp4 (3.34 MB, 1076x922)

3.34 MB MP4

>>11370028
i put more time into the skin time edit, but it just looks so bad still. the skin tone edit is a lot better (i didn't even notice the purple glare in my first attempt), and i definitely think the actual selection i made looks marginally better. but i think i'm just approaching not keeping any of the blood unselected, because the traces of cum on the edges of the blood just looks so bad, and it hardly seems possible to /only/ select the blood at some parts of it. i already spent over an hour only managing this this session, so i guess i'll just dick-around for another 11 days until i feel i have to try again just so i can caption it...

File: eny3ob.png (3.54 MB, 2560x1456)

3.54 MB PNG

pee warning. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/74302090/#74307094

mirror:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250405005607/https://litter.catbox.moe/eny3ob.png

edit #64
>>11376555
here is a mirror for the gen in this edit, as well:
https://files.catbox.moe/ok0h5w.png

File: Tanya.png (3.04 MB, 1536x2048)

3.04 MB PNG

This is my first time doing one of these. Man, I love Tanya so much it's unreal.

I have some ideas for a doujin where two pairs of conjoined twins have sex. The twin bimbos have two heads, three boobs, and two pussies meet twin traps with two heads and two penises.

File: COMIC SUPER OMEGA TRUE FI(...).png (3.15 MB, 1222x1673)

3.15 MB PNG

A two panel one! I'm hoping to make a bigger sequence, I've got pieces of it, but not sure how to piece them together. Is that guy who made the really helpful tutorials still here?

>>11377679
>Is that guy who made the really helpful tutorials still here?
he left us long ago...

File: 1757882934918397.png (2.7 MB, 1496x2184)

2.7 MB PNG

edit #65. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11377079

my first time using more than one (1) font in an edit. i used two (2). also my first time color-coding text, if you don't count my adding a trans pride flag background to trans-related words in edit #20 >>11359124. it was a lot easier than adding the trans pride flag background, since changing text color is just a click away

i really struggled with choosing what colors to use, or, at least the saturation to use for them. i found that bold colors were too distracting, so i settled on pale colors, and having the guy's color be paler than the girl's color, so as to put more emphasis on the girl's speech. but i'm not satisfied with the shade of blue i settled on for the guy's speech, but at a certain point, every time i fucked with it, i felt it always looked worse. i also struggled with the fact that i worried the guy's blue being too pale would be interpreted as queer or limp dick, but making it much bolder made it kept clashing with the pretty pale gold of the girl's text, so i couldn't do much with it. i might have to learn color theory to understand how to choose and employ colors properly. i hope it won't be too difficult, since i'm not like an artist learning about bounce light and how to immersively saturate or desaturate colors n shit. but i might learn some of that anyway in the process, but i'll try not to get too stressed-out over it

the second font i used was "satoshi black", from the same site i got "pally bold" from:
https://fontpair.co/fonts/fontshare/satoshi

they definitely changed the site since i chose "pally bold" from it. "pally" doesn't even use the "bold" version in the preview anymore, so had i chosen a font from it today, i probably wouldn't have chosen pally. i also feel they literally multiplied the font count by several times over... i also noticed a spooky font that might not've been there when i chose pally, which i might use one day:
https://fontpair.co/fonts/fontshare/comico

>>11377740
i also found that since i fixed my "gaussian blur" "stroke" (outline) layers to no longer be partially-obscured by my normal "stroke" layer, that it's simply too bold now to even dupe it once to have two (2) layers of it total; i didn't notice such until the basically white background of this image made such super clear to me. when it was partially-obscured, i used three (3) layers. now i am down to one (1), having changed nothing but ceasing to make three (3) pixels of its 7.5 pixels obscured anymore. it's shocking. since fixing it being partially-obscured, i was too lazy desu to actually compare doing it incorrectly to doing it correctly, to attempt to match it, to make fixing it not appear to be a distinct change from how i'd done it until then. but i was also too lazy to be trying to redo my presets for the "gaussian blur" to match it as 1:1 as possible. so only using one (1) "gaussian blur" "stroke" layer now is the only difference i can be arsed to do

File: IMG_4032.png (1.85 MB, 3000x1746)

1.85 MB PNG

So, captions get posted here instead of /trash/ now?

>>11377782
where's the caption thread on /trash/? i searched for one weeks ago and found nothing:
https://find.4chan.org/?q=caption

>>11376854
Brother, put some feather on your selection, also up saturation on your edited parts of the skin, adjust colour tone to not make it look so ashy. If available, use HSL edit and not curves.

>>11377792
no idea what "feather" is. is that a brush? i actually did start reducing "hardness" on my brush when i put time into it that time, when for the first time i went at it, i used 100 "hardness" and "force" (other stuff were just default for whatever the brush happened to have them as, besides size). when i did my first skin tone edit >>11368414 i felt i had more freedom for skin color, but in this one the glare just looked so bad if i did anything but make him just the silhouette of an locked character, i guess because the guy's skin unedited was so pale. but i only watched some skin edit tutorials specifically, then some generic curves/levels/hue-saturation gimp tutorials on youtube and fucked with those. i didn't entertain changing individual colors as is possible in curves (and definitely elsewhere), because i figured the skill ceiling for that would be way higher than just changing a value across the board, and i had low standards, i guess. idk what "HSL edit" is, either, but just plugging "HSL gimp" into a search engine it shows some stuff related to color, so i guess i should look into it. thank you. cheers

above all else, i am super lazy, though, so i procrastinate about everything. but i technically have the motivation to do stuff sometimes...

File: 00031-26881624.png (3.74 MB, 1664x2432)

3.74 MB PNG

pee/smegma warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11377752
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Request > 00031-26881624.png

edit #66

another disproportionately long time spent dicking around with colors and color saturation without any knowledge of color theory. i don't want to talk about it. literally took so much longer than the caption and the typesetting combined

only thing worth saying is that even without knowledge of color theory (specifically which color evoke which emotions, which i assume is part of it), between stocking's two hair colors (and regardless of blue being a perfect contrast to panty's gold anyway), pink felt like it diminished her piercing words, so i had to go with blue. i'm also more conscious, i guess, of knowing where on the color spectrum to go when choosing complimentary colors. so i am learning, i guess, even if by bashing my head against the wall. next time i will just try to remember to just watch a fucking video on color theory on 2x speed like i should've done in the first place

also, i literally forgot to reduce my font's ("pally bold") spacing to one (1) pixel between the lowest and highest lowercase letters until i literally finished the caption and started typesetting it. so i changed my "pally bold" preset to literally overlap the lowercase letters by a lot, so that whenever i switch to it i can immediately go "what the fuck" and realize i have to zoom-in after picking a font size and figure out the one-pixel gap for it before typing a single word of the caption in it

File: panelexample.png (1.57 MB, 1737x797)

1.57 MB PNG

>>11375662
>>11375671
>>11376240
Thank you everyone! Took a break for a while cause so many games came out/got updated, but have been messing around with different AI settings as well as getting some grasp on clipstudio, no more having to draw my own text bubbles and I can use the built-in poser to get compositions I want. Here's an example panel of doing that, still a very long way from putting this all together into pages. This would only be 1 panel of 3 on a page, taking my time with it all to keep experimenting. Took another goblin TF comic request, won't be particularly long cause I just wanted to use it to get used to these new tools.

I'm still using paint.net for the quick and easy edits that AI can then clean up cause the UI is so simple and easy, but CS should be a big step up when it comes to panelling, bubbles and text. Have yet to make an example I can show off of that, though.

>>11377680
>>11377679
To be honest, I was just going off whatever I imagined, there wasn't any real guide around what I was doing. Just "does this fit and look nice?" or "do they ever do this in actual manga?". Experiment and don't be afraid to start from scratch, you'll still have all the assets, it's just deciding where to arrange them that can take some retries. Look up comic panel flow examples/tutorials from people who know a lot more than I do, and generally, go back to whatever you made after a few minutes of looking at it and try to imagine you're reading it blind so you can determine whether the order makes sense.

I'm completely new to clipstudio, but might be able to provide some advice on using that for panelling once I've got some experience with it.

File: compositeexample.jpg (2.62 MB, 3046x2764)

2.62 MB JPG

>>11377679
>>11378487
Going off this, here's some examples of when I was putting together my last big comic. At first I was doing it by drawing out a simple layout and doing it piece by piece, but later on was instead making all the images first then deciding where to put them in relation to eachother. I usually make a script where I'll note which panel should be larger or where I might want them aligned, but that naturally changes a lot once you're actually making it. This lead to a lot of cutting and overlapping, but that's fine, just part of using AI assets. Also ended up flipping panels horizontally a lot, so there's inconsistency in character details like the direction of their hair (I added accessories and such last to keep those consistent at least) but honestly I don't think people really care about that. The story itself already had a big inconsistency on purpose, because I didn't think anyone looking to jack off would care about Marin's eyes not being naturally red and inserting an explanation would have gotten in the way of the story.

File: w3rwesfd.jpg (1.44 MB, 1498x1999)

1.44 MB JPG

>>11378503
Oh yeah, it goes without saying, but all of this is wrong, do not copy how I layout and panel things. I broke pretty much every rule possible cause I'm not a real artist, just a guy playing around and trying to learn how to do any of this through trial and error. Would rather make something that is wrong before I do things right, you know? But you can start by doing it right instead.

So first off, stick to vertical pages, not my mishmash of landscape 2 page spreads. That was just me experimenting.
Second, use gutters, the little gaps between panel borders. Only reason I didn't before is cause I was lazy and wasn't using good tools for it. Not necessary 100% of the time, but for separate scenes, they are. Make vertical gutters thin and horizontal ones a little thicker.
Third, look at pixiv and filter to manga and just look at how people on there lay things out. Full colour gets away with a lot, but the fundamentals of layouts still apply. You don't need to stick to a fixed template, but putting things in a clean, readable order is a craft that's been going on long before any of us were born and there are some things we can consider to be general rules.

See basic explanations here https://globalcomix.com/news/details/260/creator-tips-and-tricks-10-more-tips-for-paneling-
Pic is example templates from there alongside random examples from pixiv, they don't follow an exact template but they do generally fit into an order similar to the basic templates.

File: 00060-4033415471.png (1.96 MB, 1824x1248)

1.96 MB PNG

racism warning (probably). original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11378541
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Request > 00060-4033415471.png

edit #67

>>11378858
noticed 3rd paragraph incorrectly has the second letter in a stutter capitalized. fixed version:
https://files.catbox.moe/2opyq1.png

just another thing to add to the proofreading checklist: check ensure there aren't any capital letters where they shouldn't be

to be fair, missing this was a unique case of the line cutoff interrupting it, and i doubt i would've missed it otherwise, but still

>>11378487
>>11378503
>>11378586
Thanks for the insight, anon! I appreciate the detail, learning from the efforts/mistakes of people who've done it before you is invaluable, especially when they can articulate them that well!

File: 1757941503779036.png (2.56 MB, 1824x1248)

2.56 MB PNG

edit #68. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11377481

File: page1wip7v2.jpg (1.53 MB, 1800x2400)

1.53 MB JPG

Man I wish I was half-assing this still. Keep second guessing every single little aspect when I'd otherwise just put down whatever and move on. Any critiques?

>>11379344
i'm the poster above you, so i have never dabbled-in literally anything but "stroke" (outline) text, and only adding "gaussian blur" "stroke" layers thanks to your tutorial last thread, haha. so i REALLY cannot offer ANY advice on font choice, italic/bold text, colored/inverted colored text/stroke, speech bubbles (and which you choose for which scenario), angled text; anything; let alone formatting a comic, which is a whole nother can of worms. so please take anything i say with a grain of salt!!!!

but, that said, personally, i think the 2nd speech bubble in the 2nd panel has an oddly-phrased sentence:
>you make more mess than you clean!
the simplest amendment i can think of would be:
>you make more [of a] mess than you clean!
and i get that in the last panel, your typesetting is forced by obscuring the person's face not being an option. but even so, the second speech bubble being higher than the first made my eyes land on it (and even read it) first, so i was utterly confused about the order to read the speech bubble. i personally have struggled with stuff like this a lot, but if i can afford to, i try to make cascading staircases pretty much, where the metric for the staircase is the first character in the paragraph. for example, in this caption i made last thread (extreme content warning; do not read) >>11371529, due to the default line spacing on my font (pally bold) being so bad (or at least not optimal, from my not having manually counted the minimum difference to ensure zero overlap yet), my options for typesetting were very limited. there are essentially two rows of paragraphs in that caption, and the last row is not ideal (for me) at all; in the second row (the 4th and 5th paragraphs), the 4th paragraph starts higher than the last paragraph of the first row (the 3rd paragraph). and the 5th paragraph is the biggest mistake, since its first character starts after the 3rd paragraph of the previous row, making a staircase, as if it's to be read next

>>11379351
Good point about the position of the text bubble breaking the flow, I wasn't happy with it being there anyway. Can move the image further up and make space to put it in the lower left instead. Thank you!

>>11379360
np. glad i could help

File: 1758132113938671.png (1.48 MB, 1648x1280)

1.48 MB PNG

edit #69 (nice). original from >>>/d/hddg:
>>11378921

captionless version with dark spot under neck removed:
https://files.catbox.moe/fdhn4p.png

i've been doing small edits to gens for a while now, but stopped mentioning such (and linking the captionless version) after about the second time i did it, since they ranged in complexity (sometimes only covering a few pixels up with the surrounding background color); i just switched to silently linking them in my rentry. i was really surprised the first time i tried removing an extra digit (a sixth toe) in edit #53 >>11371213 and it looked really good, even though i didn't even try at all (compared to say, my first and only skin tone edit so far, where i redid it multiple times, saving each as their own group, then chose the best among them). it gave me the confidence to try harder with such edits. but pic related was the most complex i've done so far. it doesn't look like it, but this was several hours of work for me, across several days. the gen demanded it, because between the skin-colored spit bubble and the hair/shadow under her chin, it looked like she had a triangle goatee. i only even noticed after i started captioning it raw. i still don't understand how the "healing" tool works in gimp (despite watching several youtube tutorials on it on 2x speed), since it always just copies the wrong color (???), so i only used the "clone" tool and brushes at low hardness and force. i've never used my drawing tablet for anything but trying to draw smegma before, and i didn't bother plugging-in a mouse, so i just used my thinkpad's clit, and i struggled to do curved lines that looked okay. so that especially isn't perfect. but i think what i managed helps a lot, so i had to make an exception to mention it here. i also understand the importance of hardness/force and can perceive the nuance of colors a lot better now, so i think trying to edit-in smegma wouldn't be nearly as stressful anymore, so i plan to try it again soon

>>11380611
ran out of space, but it also occurred to me since my last edit that i could reduce the opacity of the "gaussian blur" "stroke" (outline) layers i do, since i feel two (2) is too dark, and my last edit made me feel that one (1) was too dull. but i dicked-around with it and found that even 120% blur (total, across two [2] layers) ended-up being borderline too dark on my 2nd-last edit, and maybe even still too dark on my last edit, albeit far less noticeable. i could barely notice the difference between 125% and 120% blur when i exported both as .pngs as tests, so i didn't think it was worth bothering trying to eye the perfect blur % between 100% and 120%, to standardize it across dark and light images alike. one (1) layer at 100% at my arbitrary "gaussian blur" "stroke" size (2.5x the "grow" size of the normal "stroke" layer is fine enough for me, even if it's a bit subtle on darker images like my last edit, so the text doesn't stand-out as much. but, again, standardizing it is a balance of considering light images, too. so the convenience of just doing one (1) layer makes me inclined to just not care past that. maybe i will one day bother to add a few % to it via another layer, or not bother standardizing it at all, instead doing it contextually per gen, but that would be so much more work, and i am very lazy and procrastinate about everything

>>11380612
>maybe i will one day bother to add a few % to it via another layer, or not bother standardizing it at all, instead doing it contextually per gen, but that would be so much more work, and i am very lazy and procrastinate about everything
i changed my mind already; i keep looking at (now my 2nd-last edit) and keep feeling that the text isn't bold enough. i will just do the "gaussian blur" "stroke" (outline) layers contextually from now on. don't know how bold i will make them yet, but standardization doesn't work for this. for normal "stroke" layers yes, but i don't want to fuck with that anymore

File: xp583g.png (2.57 MB, 2184x1496)

2.57 MB PNG

edit #70. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11380276
>https://files.catbox.moe/xp583g.png

File: h4yqwo.png (3.03 MB, 1608x2072)

3.03 MB PNG

pee warning. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11380276
>https://files.catbox.moe/h4yqwo.png

edit #71

File: 27l98o.png (3.04 MB, 2184x1496)

3.04 MB PNG

smegma warning. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11380316
>https://files.catbox.moe/27l98o.png

edit #72

this caption made me realize that using different font sizes in the same text box potentially requires using different "stroke" (outline) sizes for them. i didn't realize that the first time i did that in edit #54 >>11371529, likely because since i did my "gaussian blur" "stroke" layers incorrectly- such that they were partially-obscured-, the difference in boldness wasn't as noticeable. but it was easy to deal with (even if tedious), since i only had to use "quick mask" and a brush with 100% hardness and force to deselect the text in the "alpha to selection" i didn't want selected. also, doing this caption made me finally standardize the gap between speech speech and the smaller-font speech below it, since the first attempt at the gap was way too tight, so i had to do my OCD measuring and rearranging from top to bottom after pulling the proportional gap from edit #65 >>11377740

>>11380893
unfortunately only had the thought to look up the difference between "transparent" and "translucent" after posting, and apparently the former means you can clearly see through it, and the latter means you can't clearly see through it. the latter suggests thicker precum, so i would've used that instead had i known

File: 1750690896466422.png (2.4 MB, 2016x1152)

2.4 MB PNG

pee warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11317224/#11317729

edit #73

File: 1758205738680475.png (1.53 MB, 1664x1536)

1.53 MB PNG

edit #74. original from >>>/d/hddg:
>>11379435

>>11382081
i guess catbox does have thumbnails, because the thumbnail for this is broken in my catbox album... hope it figures itself out eventually...

File: 1758560376530375.png (2.37 MB, 1568x2016)

2.37 MB PNG

edit #75. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11382024

File: 1743869647322004.png (2.16 MB, 1152x1920)

2.16 MB PNG

edit #76. original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11265595/#11267093

>>11382088
forgot to say that it definitely DIDN'T retroactively figure itself out eventually; i had to delete and reupload the image when catbox uploads stopped having broken thumbnails. and it didn't have a thumbnail in the "view files" page of catbox, either

holy shit!!! the wayback machine (archive.org) just excluded catbox!!! so much shit just retroactively lost forever. the wayback machine was so much more convenient than archive.today at archiving catbox, since it actually saved full-res images from albums without having to do it manually, which no one did. so much media lost, as well, since no one even knows of archive.today, so so much stuff was ONLY archived on archive.org. i have to reformat my rentry, now, to switch to archive.today mirrors, if available... i last linked a wayback machine mirror on it as recently as four (4) days ago...

>>11383244
also, not relevant to the thread, but i didn't even think about videos... archive.today can't even archive videos... this shit is sad
>>11377026
replacement mirror for this gen:
http://archive.today/2025.04.05-005609/https://litter.catbox.moe/eny3ob.png

File: with the green.png (2.17 MB, 2441x1038)

2.17 MB PNG

Not the big Robin comic, but just something fun.

>>11383486
lmao. based

File: o0pfoh.png (2.65 MB, 1248x1824)

2.65 MB PNG

edit #77. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11383222
>https://files.catbox.moe/o0pfoh.png

File: 1758731222371676.png (2.57 MB, 1248x1824)

2.57 MB PNG

edit #78. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11383222

File: 20250925_153521_gimp-3.mp4 (3.95 MB, 1120x810)

3.95 MB MP4

welp, i just took on another nightmare edit of doom. i honestly think my first attempt- which i never meant to be perfect; only to be an honest go at it- looks a lot better. i still have to look into the color saturation options the anon earlier put me onto, which i haven't even begun to look into because my laziness knows no bounds... sorry

idk if i can really be arsed to put time into edits like these, though. i just want to make coomer captions, and edits affording me the opportunity to confidently do such are really just a means to an end, for me, and not fulfilling in themselves, for me. i don't even link the captionless versions of my edits anymore for that reason, since i don't consider them noteworthy for their own merits. i guess if i manage this or the vampire skin tone edit in >>11376854 (which i've been dragging my feet about even putting time into anymore for something like a literal month now), i probably would link the captionless versions of them here, though. but none of this really matters, anyway, because realistically i will continue to drag my feet about ever finishing either of these edits, and instead just do images i can either caption raw, or quickly edit in order to caption them in the meantime... where "meantime" means slowly approaching forever without even ever picking-away at them again...

File: 00017-4267641635.png (2.25 MB, 1664x2432)

2.25 MB PNG

edit #79. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11297430/#11297494
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Request > 00017-4267641635.jpg

File: 1748545677779594.png (2.31 MB, 1248x1824)

2.31 MB PNG

pee warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11297430/#11298893

edit #80

i have officially RUN OUT (!) of gens to caption!!!!... at least, gens i'm most passionate about captioning, that i can either caption raw, or do a quick edit to to make them captionable. even picrel was kind of a struggle caption, since grins are too forward to spin as lowkey, which severely limits opportunity for casual and subversive dialogue, so i usually consider them "uncaptionable", but i managed to mostly diminish the forwardness of the expression thanks to the blush and casualness of the pic otherwise. i feel i fluked it

my personal tier list of stuff to caption is:
uncut pp > horsecock > knot > [power gap] > inverted nipples

... and that's kinda it. i have other preferences like fat girls and flat chests, but neither of them have to be cis girls to be such, and they kinda fall into the general concept-i-take-to-its-logical-conclusion thing as any other fetish i've done, so they only hold so much weight (no pun intended) on their own. i view inverted nipples as similar to phimosis pps, which i view as the most girly, so i view it as making the convo for my preference in girl pps

the only options i feel i have now are to caption cis girls primarily (the horror...), to work on the skin tone or smegma color change edits i've been procrastinating about (pain...), or edit in smegma myself- with zero drawing skill-, to afford me far more opportunity to caption what i'm most passionate about: pee and smegma. i did say >>11380611
>also understand the importance of hardness/force and can perceive the nuance of colors a lot better now, so i think trying to edit-in smegma wouldn't be nearly as stressful anymore, so i plan to try it again soon
... but my procrastination is the death of me. i can continue floundering around by captioning new gens posted in >>>/d/ddg for a second, but idk how i will ever reach even 100 captions as things are right now

File: 20250928_182835_gimp-3.mp4 (2.5 MB, 1070x846)

2.5 MB MP4

this is gonna sound stupid, but i didn't realize i could literally just add color to selections via sliders n shit; i literally just clicked around under the "color" tab until i landed on this. i did reread anon's post from earlier on changing color, and i think i understand it, now, besides "HSL edit", which i am still procrastinating about looking into

i might change the color beyond how it is in picrel; i just wasn't sure whether the fingers should cast a shadow that desaturates the color of the wood, or anything, so i thought picrel was fine enough to just send it, but i realize now that i can dick around with it a lot more outside of the recording

>>11385684
No worries anon, don't burn yourself out.

>>11386086
o, thanks for the friendly reply, haha. but i'm not burn-out creativity-wise; it's just that, for example, even though i love girl pps most of all and have hella amounts of them saved, i don't really now how to spin them. like, take these from the same thread, by the same genner:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/71369153/#71380108
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/71369153/#71380313
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/71369153/#71381163

these are all great, to me; they are more than just naked 1girl; the first two are no panties flashing, and the third is far more casual than just flashing; it's stretching her leg, and her only coincidentally having a blatant erection that's leaking precum through the clothing. it's stuff like the third gen that inspires me most; when gens have layers of depth to them, so they really just write themselves in how the dialogue would play out. but i feel the third gen either isn't casual enough of a scenario for me to be just off-the-wall casual with it, or is too conventional of a scenario period, so it literally writes itself in a way everyone knows already. i guess it's both. i can't do anything with it that people wouldn't see coming a million miles away

these are just three random gens i picked; it's a similar story for most of them. i can look at any gen i captioned and tell you how i feel they uniquely afforded me opportunity to caption them, such as say, my last caption, where even though it was a struggle from the huge grin being forward- thus demanding forward dialogue to meet it-, it's still a casual enough scenario where you can spin it many different ways. gens can succeed in being immersive porn while failing to be casual, and i feel that a lot, now that i look at gens with new eyes (besides really stuff posted to twitter, since i'm scared to quote retweet any semi-large or smaller genner with the gratuitous fetish captions i make). but as i see more gens i'll see more opportunity to caption

>>11385684
in hindsight i think the black sclera and pale colors in this gen was the perfect opportunity to try inverting the text/stroke colors here, but it didn't occur to me until just now. i just did it on the 3rd paragraph as a test and am not sure it looks better, but it is better contrast for sure, so if it occurred to me before i probably would've done it. will keep an eye out for opportunities like this in the future

>>11385684
>>11386155
i went back and made inverted text/stroke (outline) versions of this caption:
https://files.catbox.moe/ajachp.png - 120% blur
https://files.catbox.moe/o1cc5n.png - 100% blur
https://files.catbox.moe/nmruo0.png - 80% blur

i didn't just make a definitive single version of it, because the original having 120% blur was specific to the contrast the non-inverted text demanded; having to change it when i realized i didn't even prefer the inverted colors anyway was effort i couldn't be arsed to do, so i just exported some alts instead. i didn't even do the inverted colors in a non-destructive way, so i just discarded them as unsaved changes instead. at least now i know i'm not in the business of doing inverted colors text/stroke (outline), since this was the perfect opportunity to do it, and i didn't prefer it

>>11386169
>since this was the perfect opportunity to do it, and i didn't prefer it
actually, i think i'm wrong. i think the last paragraph looks especially bad, because the blur stroke (outline) being white is basically invisible against her pale skin, so it looks like i just took some black text and slapped it on an image with no stroke (outline) to ensure contrast. so i think contrast should be determined by the stroke (outline) color, so for this gen, its pale colors goes well with the black stroke (outline)

i still don't think i'm going to dabble in inverted text/stroke colors, though. if anything my caption just before was the actual perfect opportunity to try inverted text/stroke colors, but i think it looks plenty aesthetic as is, so it didn't even occur to me to change it; it's just uniquely that pale gens and pale text is like a double flashbang, so i thought inverting the text/stroke colors would help, but personally i don't prefer it

File: 00046-2058661310.png (2.38 MB, 1248x1824)

2.38 MB PNG

pee/smegma warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11204125/#11206584
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Monster > 00046-2058661310.png

edit #81

>>11386032
in the end, even being able to add color, i couldn't manage to immersively make the color between the fingers much lighter than in the video, i guess because it's saturating such a dark grey. i managed to make it a little lighter, but that's all. thankfully i can kind of get away with it here, but in other circumstances i will need to learn more about changing the color of stuff to feel okay with how it ends up...

File: 00081-2800540896.png (2.47 MB, 1248x1824)

2.47 MB PNG

rape warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Monster > 00081-2800540896.png

edit #82

learned many things with this edit. firstly, especially coming off of the last edit, i felt the warm colors in the last edit particularly complimented the stark white text + black stroke (outline) of my raw captions, so i wanted to use warm colors in the caption text, which obviously demanded not just defaulting to the pale text colors i've used exclusively until now, so that was worry, but the actual problem was that no matter what colors i chose, it looked bad. for the bee girl's text i sampled an orange/brown from the cave, to provide a color of rich honey. but i kept having to make it paler and paler to not clash with the cave color. i also made the stroke (outline) of the 4th and 5th paragraphs far bolder for extra contrast, finally shedding another ocd restraint i had of trying to standardize everything at the cost of contextually making things look better. but that only highlighted the elephant in the room i had yet to realize, of the black stroke (outline) severely hampering my efforts to add warm colors. so i somehow had a breakthrough, and tried making the stroke (outline) the honey color instead. it instantly worked. i literally didn't even change the girl's stroke (outline) color at all; it was simply what i was looking for, right away

i was worried that making the guy have a colored stroke (outline) would come off as queer, but it was simply the only option, so i went with it. i was worried at first that just paint bucket filling the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layer would be impure- having traces of the previous color-, but i tested it, and it didn't, so it wasn't any harder than changing the text color to get the guy's stroke (outline) color pale enough. i still have yet to learn a lick of color theory- due to procrastination-, but i'm glad i managed this, even so

>>11386642
>i also made the stroke (outline) of the 4th and 5th paragraphs far bolder for extra contrast, finally shedding another ocd restraint i had of trying to standardize everything at the cost of contextually making things look better
unfortunately i think i made them too bold. what happened was i just copied the boldness i'd tuned for the default black stroke (outline) i do. i didn't realize that the contrast between the text/stroke (outline) colors being poorer now means that the stronger the stroke, the worse the contrast, actually, since the background doesn't aid as much in providing contrast. i feel doing colored stroke (outline) was a unique case here, so i don't know when i will ever do it again, but still. duly noted for next time. as well, i could've tried changing the honey stroke (outline) color too, but it already works as is, so no need

... but actually, i just opened it in gimp and started playing around with the duplicated layer of "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) text for those paragraphs, and i don't think lowering the opacity makes it much better, because the pale colors in the background are just their own version of providing poor contrast. so i guess i should've just chosen a different stroke (outline) color instead. but i didn't notice those paragraphs being a problem until i slept on it. but i definitely do want the stroke (outline) to be bolder; it makes the text over the wings so much more legible. but it's a tough balance. i would've figured it out had this occurred to me when editing, though

File: Tentacle Magic.jpg (190 KB, 918x1298)

190 KB JPG

>>11376237
I guess I'll be the first to use this. I made fanfiction of Bonnouji Yura's top tier tentacle birth doujin >>11314317
https://rentry.co/syv3q7vs
/r/ing some stuff in his artstyle. Or just a pic, anything is good.

[spoiler]I gather you probably meant "Delivery Anchor" but whatever. Quick shot in the dark. Hopefully someone likes my idea enough to gen some cool shit for me.

>>11386986
idk if this is the type of thread where genners would take requests, haha. i figured if the gen were a vehicle for the caption then maybe, but i just copy pasted the OP from the original thread, and i guess it's more of a sequential storytelling thread than an OC thread period, so just a single gen without even multiple panels would have made the last OP disappoint. but i guess a genner might be more inclined to read your work and be inspired by it here than in say >>>/d/ddg , so maybe it makes more sense to shoot your shot here than there

and while i have opened >>11351094 ("Color and E/d/it Thread") before and seen that they have a deliveries anchor, they ONLY have a deliveries anchor, since the expected outcome for their thread is a deluge of requests, with scarce deliveries. this thread's default posts are expected to be unprovoked OC, with scarce requests, let alone deliveries. plus it's extra burden on the person delivering to anchor their delivery. i didn't think to provide one desu, but i'm not sure it's necessary

>>11386988
Yeah fair. Didn't seem likely.

File: Untitled.png (28 KB, 1808x1568)

28 KB PNG

>>11386642
>i was worried at first that just paint bucket filling the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layer would be impure- having traces of the previous color-, but i tested it, and it didn't
this is NOT TRUE btw. while it's true that the test i did (checking paint bucket filling it would leave traces of the previous color) does NOT leave traces of the previous color, it is STILL IN FACT IMPURE!!!! i bothered making a 450 font size test to demonstrate, but i guess at larger font sizes the destructiveness of paint bucket filling stroke (outline) layers isn't as visible, so it was a waste of time. but here are exports of the unedited stroke (outline) layers vs. the paint bucket filled layers, and you can clearly see that the complexity of the gradient is NOT PRESERVED!!!!! i honestly thought i was going schizo when i found that my "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) percentage of choice for my last edit (and the current one i'm working on, which was what made me finally realize this) was too bold, but no; it's that changing the color turned virtually all gradient into being the boldest color. paint bucket filing existing stroke (outline) layers should only be treated as a test, since it a destructive edit- in it literally compromising the integrity of the stroke (outline) layer- and should therefore not reach the finished product

File: 1741564898148.png (2.61 MB, 1456x1800)

2.61 MB PNG

pee/smegma warning. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/73632816/#73634983

edit #83

i think i'll pick up coloring the stroke (outline) layers of the text to match who's speaking from now on, albeit using a much darker color than i did in my last edit, since the purpose is no longer to provide warm color to a gen devoid of such. i honestly would've gone with a darker color for this edit still, but i got tired of trying to distinguish between imperceptible color differences at any reasonable viewing distance, so i just sent it at a certain point, and will probably do the same for every edit following. also, when i said >>11387234
>i honestly thought i was going schizo when i found that my "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) percentage of choice for my last edit[...] was too bold, but no; it's that changing the color turned virtually all gradient into being the boldest color
while paint bucket filling "alpha to selection" layers does indeed destroy the gradients of them, in my last edit i actually bothered redoing the normal stroke (outline) layers plus the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layers, so since for the bee girl's dialogue i never changed her stroke (outline) colors, the gradient on it was never compromised; it actually /was/ simply that changing the color provided different contrast, so i needed to reduce the opacity of the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layers to compensate. since i paint bucket filled the male speech in that edit, however, his was indeed compromised

File: 20251001_134719_gimp-3.mp4 (3.82 MB, 1184x810)

3.82 MB MP4

>>11384068
i put more time into this because desu i thought my first attempt already looked really good, so i thought if i tried harder that i could manage it, but i think it actually looks worse, now. i think the idea of trying to select only the dark parts specifically is a lost cause when the boundaries between what is light or dark smegma is so vague; i think i'm better off just literally selecting all the smegma indiscriminately and changing the color that way, as my first attempt coincidentally more or less was. but i've exhausted the willpower i had to put time into this today, so next time inspiration strikes me i'll probably just make a caption requiring minor editing- if any at all- to unwind

desu i don't even know when i would've next put time into this edit- let alone the vampire blood fellatio skin tone edit-, but /ddg/ (the ai thread i get most of my edits from) had someone complain about the board being unprecedentedly slow as of late, which caused /ddg/ to linger on page 10 with genners holding back their edits, making the low traffic even worse >>11387236. then a few genners collectively flooded the thread for the remaining few dozen images to get it to image limit to make the new thread without anyone complaining about it being made "early". i saw several gens in that image dump that i'd like to caption, when prior to such i felt i had literally run out of images to caption unless i compromised and looked for cis girls to caption. so with the increased opportunity to procrastinate, i felt i should at least try to stop procrastinating, in some way. i did at least try... will hopefully try again soon

also, when i said >>11387350
>while paint bucket filling "alpha to selection" layers does indeed destroy the gradients of them
i meant doing so TWICE; not just once. i don't know of a way to do stroke (outline) without "alpha to selection" anyway, so i'm glad the first paint bucket fill seems very high integrity. too bad any following ones are not

>>11377026
just saw this character in the wild again and learned she's not an OC, and learned her name ("uzawa reisa" from "blue archive"). now my tweet of this on my 0-follower account didn't mention her name when it should have. for shame. i thought i looked at the metadata and didn't see a character name, but i just looked at it again, and it's right there. i definitely just skimmed it, and missed it cause it was the first tag after the "BREAK", at the start of the line. feels bad. if it didn't have metadata i'd have tried plugging tags into boorus to see if a character fits the description like i usually do. will try to be better about this. doesn't super matter (again, 0-follower account), but i am OCD, so sucks to've just not called her by her name when i could have. will retroactively add her name to my rentry, anyway

File: 20251001_172704_gimp-3.mp4 (3.83 MB, 1006x810)

3.83 MB MP4

>>11387661
it's not perfect, but i'm probably just gonna send it, at this point. the stray unintended selected pixels from using a brush with low force/hardness, i don't know how to do anything about it, since i can't see them in the selection. i'm sure i could go in gimp settings and change selection settings to show me them, but going in settings every edit seems like a huge pain in the arse. i guess i could just keep it on, but that seems annoying. the only way i can think of to not have this happen in the first place is to select with the free select tool instead, then take a low force/hardness brush to it on a second pass, but that is so much work, when edits like these aren't the fun part of editing, to me; captions are; i just do these edits because i have to, depending on the gen. but maybe for future edits i'll do the two-pass strat. at least i'm learning

>>11386641
>>11387350
Thanks for your captions anon, foreskin, smegma, and spreading it in and on a woman's body are my biggest kinks and they're so rare, especially spreading cock cheese inside their pussies.And your photoshop edits look great when they look mildly white/yellow

>>11388309
wow, thank you!!!! it's my biggest kink, too!!! except i guess i might technically like girl pee and smegma more, but i'm much less creative and graphic with that, since i don't like girls using their dicks, haha. i was going out of my way to not plug my rentry and catbox album so far, since i especially didn't want to just do so right after creating the thread, but here's my rentry, if you haven't seen it, where i add a pee or smegma warning to anything where the caption references such:
https://rentry.co/ambihurts
https://catbox.moe/c/7vd589

i think any smegma captions are ALWAYS guy smegma, actually, lmao. i don't really have opportunity to do anything creative with girl smegma, since i don't like girls using their dicks. but pee might be either guy or girl pee (or both). and only my next edit will be changing the color of the smegma, haha. and it's girl smegma, and will probably be the first caption i make about girl smegma. but i am hoping to surely one day try drawing in smegma myself. i've been procrastinating about it a lot (a LOT...). the last time i tried drawing smegma was edits 10 and 12, which were both girl smegma, and i didn't understand brush hardness/force at all, so i just used 100 on both, and it was not good. i think i can do it better, now, but i keep procrastinating about trying... i even have a drawing tablet to do it, too, even though i have zero (0) drawing skill. all i need to do is try. but, idk when i will... sorry

there's also the anon in the OP- ConCor- who CAN and DOES actually draw smegma, though only on girls, from what i've seen. their links are in the link in the OP, but here it is for convenience, anyway:
https://rentry.co/ccedit
https://catbox.moe/c/h3yc3o
https://e-hentai.org/uploader/concor

they mostly post to the no-ai futa-specific caption thread here >>11312231, which is the sister thread mentioned in the OP

File: 1758802267626987.png (3.4 MB, 1840x1840)

3.4 MB PNG

smegma warning. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11383841

edit #84

captionless version with smegma turned pale:
https://files.catbox.moe/t5yor0.png

>>11387780
i couldn't figure out how to increase the visible selection threshold in gimp settings, so i just made a layer of the blown-out, flattened "curves" effect and toggled it on and off with "quick mask" on, to see where i had to apply a 100 hardness and force brush to. i couldn't be bothered to actually do it perfectly, since i wasn't trying to go all the way up against the selection, and have to redo it with a low hardness and force brush, so it still isn't perfect, but i did what i could, at least

also, gimp has a lot of quirks about it i've had to learn to compensate for, but this edit made me come across the most fucked up one so far, in that if you have a selection active when exporting, it FLATTENS any color effects you've done to anything done to a selection, making it pitch black. it looked really unsettling. do not recommend

File: dcbnpx.png (3.49 MB, 1608x2072)

3.49 MB PNG

smegma warning. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11383867
>https://files.catbox.moe/dcbnpx.png

edit #85

captionless version:
https://files.catbox.moe/4uggtw.png

this wasn't the most demanding edit i've done- that still goes to edit #69 >>11380611-, but it /was/ the one where i had to edit the most things. again, i've stopped linking the captionless versions of my edits a long time ago- since edits like these just take time for me, now, and aren't stressful to me anymore, nor do i learn anything new doing them-, but i will make an exception for this, since i'm talking about it. i removed the horizontal line in the inverted nipples, removed the extra line near the bottom edge of her teeth, removed the eyelids that are too high to be eyelids, and removed the watermark bottom left. but unfortunately the watermark was the last thing i did, which i didn't even notice until i thought i was done with the editing, but i was at a complete loss about how to deal with it, since until now i've only been using the clone tool, or outright drawing in the edits myself, with zero drawing skill. i didn't understand how the healing tool worked despite having watched multiple videos on it, so i watched a video on it on 2x speed by a guy i watched a curves tool video on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VcthL001Uc

and he ACTUALLY taught me how the healing tool worked. i understand literally everything about it now. it trivialized removing the watermark that i had no idea how to remove, and would've trivialized doing the gradient when removing the pseudo-double eyebrows, which i really struggled with drawing in manually, and was why i didn't even try drawing over the watermark myself, since it was covered in fog. i literally laughed out loud when i removed it with the healing tool, since it was so easy, and i'm not sure whether it was a happy laugh, or from finding it absurd how i'd painstakingly drawn in shit i didn't have to prior. at least now i know

File: 1759349631239.png (2.24 MB, 1248x1824)

2.24 MB PNG

edit #86. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/78250632/#78255138

>>11387234
i realized this edit that using "colorize" in gimp doesn't destroy gradients like paint bucket filling an "alpha to selection" layer twice does, and it has instant previews without committing to any color, so it is far more convenient than paint bucket filling twice, anyway. the only thing about it is that using it doesn't add the color you choose to your "color history", so if you don't manually add it, you might find yourself absentmindedly, tediously changing the color of everything to match what you chose, only to find that you did it with the wrong color, but didn't notice because you're dealing with imperceptible color differences

File: 1759350674493.png (2.57 MB, 1248x1824)

2.57 MB PNG

pee/smegma warning. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/78250632/#78255439

edit #87

(reposted cause i forgot the content warning at first)

File: 1759287155180307.png (2.86 MB, 1568x2016)

2.86 MB PNG

misandry warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11387273

edit #88

>>11392072
i already learned the following >>11386032, but i guess i forgot about it and had to have a schizo moment as i realized it again when making this edit, but the "colorize" tool in gimp is merely saturating the existing color with your chosen color; it is not a true replacement for- in my conventional use case- remaking my stroke (outline) layers when i want to change their color. so it is a handy tool to change colors to some extent, but since you're estimating how much you have to saturate it by to shift the color by the slightest bit you're looking for (in my OCD use case), it's a bit of an unpleasant experience

File: 1759404349733_waifu2x_art(...).png (3.58 MB, 2048x2048)

3.58 MB PNG

racism warning. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/78267986/#78269921

edit #89

had lots of trouble with this edit. even the caption was hard to manage, but i've had to dig deep for captions before, so it's nothing new. but since i'm complaining anyway, i may as well say how it was the case here. i hate narcissistic tops; i think tops should be caricatures of masculinity in every case. so right off the bat, the gen being extremely NTR-coded (consenting to the guy next to her; being stern towards the viewer) was the exact opposite of what i wanted, but i really liked the guy's body, so i forced the caption anyway. i literally spent hours stressing about finding even a single possible way to caption it

as well, the guy's arm behind her is clearly the ai giving him slenderman arms; it's very clearly his elbow at his WAIST. but his bicep isn't tilted away at all- to at all suggest his elbow pointing behind him-, so i couldn't just reduce the shadow to make it look like his forearm. i left it as is, since i can still cope that since he's strongfat, he might just have buff forearms, even though his hand should be visible if it were his forearm

but the biggest thing is that the guy's schizo ai facial hair is a disaster. i spent probably close to two (2) hours fucking with it across seven (7) drafts of different methods before giving up on it. i thought the healing tool in gimp was magic- since it was so zero-effort to cover the watermark the first time i tried using it >>11390697-, but little did i know that i am at the mercy of the healing source. the art style being so jpeggy (and the gen being a jpeg, anyway, despite being 1024x1024 [literally the smollest res- and thus file- size conventionally possible]) on top of the complex gradients just made it FUBAR. even when upscaling it 2x in waifu2x i had to use NO noise reduction, because otherwise it compromised the art style, which is inherently noisy. so i just sent it as is

>>11376237
First time, don’t know if this is the proper way to request, and I can post images if needed

I’d like captions for either of the scenarios:
>muscle drain comic pov where the girl drains all my muscles for herself, emasculates and belittles me, destroys my ego and confidence, ill be weak forever, no girl would date a guy with no muscle, etc. Make her horny for her muscle growth
>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

Thank you

b

>>11398336
thanks anon, haha. sorry; i've been really stressing about doing the second of anon's request ever since he dropped it. i was gonna summarize it in the delivery (whenever that'd be), but since i have the opportunity to do so now, i may as well blogpost about it

first of all, i only edit ai art, because i consider genners more approachable than real artists (personal constrain). but the first problem was that passionate expressions in gens apparently DOESN'T EXIST. no exceptions!!! so i spent three (3) days looking or such a gen, even requesting it on /e/'s ai thread >>>/e/3011160 before giving up on receiving it, but before actually just forcing the caption into a gen without such an expression, i meekly requested the gen in /d/'s ai thread, and two regulars familiar with me there delivered (yay), but most importantly for this blog post, a genner unfamiliar with me delivered- after constantly changing their MANY deliveries MULTIPLE times in an attempt to pacify my nitpicking feedback asking for a more passionate expression-, but unfortunately, i unknowingly called it early, because i thought their delivery had the passion i was looking for, but only realized when i went to caption it (after 24h, for no reason but my own laziness) that the girl's expression is constrained, so it's hard to caption as passionate. you can see the gens here >>11396733, and here's the specific one i think i've settled on captioning (archive link for when the litterbox link expires in three [3] days):
https://litter.catbox.moe/yk78bx7nl71o6vpq.png
http://archive.today/2025.10.15-131055/https://litter.catbox.moe/yk78bx7nl71o6vpq.png

this is by far the most i've ever stressed about captioning an image. the problem is that because her wavy smile is her literally holding back her smile, i need the guy to either be approaching her, or standing there not noticing her, and she's drooling over him. (cont.)

>>11398336
>>11398356
{cont.) but i couldn't make the guy approach her using his muscles to get in her pants, because that'd be super tryhard and cringe. and the girl not speaking (because she can't, since she's holding back her smile) would make the guy approaching seem super rapey, which i love rape a lot, but it's just baggage making the caption impure. and the guy just standing there not noticing isn't really an option, either, because she's literally facing him with her entire body, looking right at him. i looked at the other options from the delivery (specifically the last post, since they are the only ones with the worried eyebrows, which i feel help a lot to capture the expression), and the first is pretty great, too, but the camera angle being lower in a way i don't know how to spin means idk how to work with it. 2nd shares the same problem. 4th and 6th (last) are clearly in private, so i feel it'd more demand dialogue acknowledging the inevitable intimacy, thus diminishing the opportunity to perv on the guy's muscles (the point of the caption)

i think i lost my point at the end there going on about the other options, but i don't want to let anon's effort genning this for me go to waste, but i also haven't even written a single word to caption it yet after nearly 30h since i actually started trying to. i'm gonna caption the deliveries from the two /ddg/ regulars who helped me out cause they're familiar with me, too, but their expressions don't have the mouth holding back the smile, so it writes itself; i just didn't want to do them first, since the genner who wasn't familiar with me delivered for me first, so i didn't want to exhaust my creativity on the request and have to do it with a twist, and i didn't want to have it on my conscience to do it last as an afterthought, anyway. but this has me fucked up, for real. but i'm trying... mostly thingken... had more to say, but two max-character posts is probably enough

>>11398358
>and the guy just standing there not noticing isn't really an option, either, because she's literally facing him with her entire body, looking right at him.
well, i've been rereading my posts (and noticing the several grammatical errors in them...), but in rereading this a few times and looking back at the gens and stuff, i think i can actually spin it as if the guy is unbothered by the girl's blatant need, implicitly because he gets girls losing their panties over him all the time. so the girl can be shamelessly taking in the sight of him, and the guy could be looking right at her, but simply not care. i think that is the way i'll do it, but i've already gotten into the habit of being lazy, so i might not just crank it out right away (that was my logic for waiting 24 [!] hours to even begin captioning it, since i'd gotten into the habit of only dropping a caption once every other day rather than once a day)... sorry. but i think (hope) i can, now, without much issue, nor feeling i'm forcing the caption

also, i noticed i forgot to mention the following, but the girl's speech would be internal dialogue, because it must, since with her mouth holding back a smile, she is unable to speak. i definitely just forgot to say so earlier in the post, but i definitely would've mentioned it at the end had i had enough space to include that unfortunately after 12h of trying to caption the gen, i felt so confident in understanding the dialogue the expression demanded that i responded to the genner saying their delivery was "enough" >>11397980, and sure, it IS enough; but i thought my stress was behind me, but it wasn't!!! my post really came off as "the gen just demands internal dialogue, which is fine", but i only realized a ways after submitting it that i was NOT that confident about things; my brain was working overtime trying to find a breakthrough that would ACTUALLY allow me to write even a single word of the caption for it. pain. but, i got there, i think (hope)

This is the muscle worship/drain requester anon responding. I didn’t know that this type of stuff was this difficult, and I very much appreciate the effort you’re putting into with my request. Muscle is just such an obsession of mine, I get you said it’s try hardy in one of the posts but I love it. Why not try hardy, like you’re doing now lol

Anyway, very much appreciated. Sorry if it’s stressful.

>>11399127
you're good, haha. it's not stressful at all once i got the pic for it!!! i would've had the first finished by now (with two more on the way), but i literally finished typesetting it and was ready to add the finishing touches (just the stroke [outline]) to make the text actually look good, but i somehow only then realized that i calculated my standardized font size as 42 rather than 35, so i had to typeset it again. since it's been so long since i've posted a caption i'll post them one at a time, probably, or the second genner to provide me pics provided a ton, so i might do several of their images and post a batch of a few of that (maybe 2-4), then the last genner's separately
>Muscle is just such an obsession of mine, I get you said it’s try hardy in one of the posts but I love it. Why not try hardy, like you’re doing now lol
i didn't mean to say muscle is tryhard, sorry!!! i meant using your muscles to pull women comes off to me as narcissistic, which i don't personally like in guys, cause i prefer guys to be caricatures of masculinity: stoic, virile, dominant. but knowing you like otherwise, i can indulge you, haha. i would still kinda cringe at a guy straight-up approaching a girl and using his muscle to pull her, but something where the guy is purposely leaning into the fact that he's muscular, i got you

>>11399131
No offense taken! I get what you’re saying. Being in a loving relationship is so much more than superficiality. But my porn brain requires those base primal needs, and as a bodybuilder I’m disgusted by how little straight muscle worship porn there is.

Is it too much to ask to be used for my body lol

>>11399149
i don't think you understood my gripe, sorry; it's not that muscle worship at all demands narcissism- since such could be done exclusively on the part of the girl, without any reaction from the guy at all-; it's that a guy unprovoked using his muscles to attract a girl isn't the lowkey vibe i conventionally wish for guys to conform to. but knowing you like it, i can do something with it still, without it coming off as johnny bravo, basically

>>11399152
Oh ok, sorry! Now I get what you’re saying lol

Man I wish I can draw. All thisbart is incredible

>>11399160
the only people who've posted any drawn art ITT it the tummy growl guy >>11377679 and this anon >>11377782, haha. the rest is ai

>>11399162
Oh lolol. Im dumb sorry

File: kjbudrm4rpsclvli.png (2.4 MB, 1080x1920)

2.4 MB PNG

edit #90. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11396733
>http://archive.today/2025.10.15-130955/https://litter.catbox.moe/kjbudrm4rpsclvli.png

request #7 >>11394693
>>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

i explained how my hands were tied with this caption across my (enormous) yapfest blog posts a second ago, but to say it again anyway, i could only make the muscle lust so highkey, because the expression (the mouth specifically) was constrained, which i didn't realize until it was too late to ask for an amendment to the gen. i plan to caption others for this request later, which will be much more forward and unrestrained

>>11399198
Thank you for the first one. I appreciate it very much. Excited to see what comes next. Thank you!

File: 00102-4290882866.png (1012 KB, 832x1216)

1012 KB PNG

edit #91. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11396741
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/eDg3ACQY
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Caption-Anon's oddly specific requests > 00102-4290882866.png

request #7.2 >>11394693
>>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

sorry; i could've finished these captions much quicker, but for the first some 24 hours, while i wouldn't say i was panicking, i definitely realized partway into the first caption that i knew nothing about the actual properties of muscle. like, even wikipedia describes chest muscles (pecs) as "fan-shaped". i literally don't even have the slightest knowledge of the shapes muscles make to even flirt with such dialogue, let alone anything actually advanced like where they connect, their layering, their constituent parts, the process of stressing them to make them grow back stronger... i basically just wallowed in my ignorance in futility until i gave up on being anatomically detailed, to instead just take the concept of a body part to its logical extreme... it's the only way i could even finish the first caption, but once i started doing it, the rest was easy. but, yeah; someone more educated on the human body would be able to deliver proper detail; i can only do prose... sorry

the pale backgrounds also made me have another breakthrough, in that i added the slightest pale color to the text color, so that the text wasn't just a flashbang on a flashbang. i think it helps to draw attention to the text naturally, too, since it is easier to look at than the pale backgrounds. i don't know yet whether i will be standardizing this following, but for this batch of gens, i think it helps

there are two (2) other gens in the batch that caught my eye, and i already have an idea for one, but this thread was on page 10 already, so i quickly finished this to get these out so far!!

File: 00106-4290882870.png (1.19 MB, 832x1216)

1.19 MB PNG

edit #92. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11396741
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/KGxlhKSA
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Caption-Anon's oddly specific requests > 00106-4290882870.png

request #7.3 >>11394693
>>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

here i kind of had to break my silent rule (i only eventually picked up) of not overlapping the text on tits. but i literally typesetted it with the paragraphs on the opposite side of the image horizontally, and the real estate i had to work with in the end was much worse, so the first typesetting attempt was the best of the two

File: 00105-4290882869.png (1.1 MB, 832x1216)

1.1 MB PNG

edit #93. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11396741
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/SKp1CS5L
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Caption-Anon's oddly specific requests > 00105-4290882869.png

request #7.4 >>11394693
>>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

File: 00095-2761502631.png (1.3 MB, 832x1216)

1.3 MB PNG

sexism warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11396741
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/GH51EICT
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Caption-Anon's oddly specific requests > 00095-2761502631.png

edit #94. request #7.5 >>11394693
>>a muscle worship pov with the girl worshipping my entire muscular physique. Heavy detail, heavy muscle fetish from the girl, cumming just from my immense muscularity

sorry; the pace at which i've been getting through this batch has been really embarrassing!!! i don't mean to just do my (now) usual caption-every-other-day pace for a batch of gens, even though it's what i just ended up doing!!! sorry!!! this time it's because i've hit another wall yet, in that where i worked around the first wall by realizing that even if i know nothing about muscles, i could still sexualize them conceptually, picrel was supposed to be a bicep fetishism caption, but i had NO (!) ideas for how to fetishize biceps at all!!! i essentially only gestured towards the idea of the arms being muscular... sorry. the next caption (the last of this batch) might be more of the same, but hopefully i won't take two days to do it, like this one. then there's one more by a different genner i'll caption for the request before exhausting the media for it, and just defaulting to my usual, which i think i've started absentmindedly using dickgirl and cis girl images on and off, so i'll probably keep doing that (provided i'm uniquely inspired to caption a cis girl, since i don't even really like cis girls for their own merits), so the first caption i default to will be a dickgirl, whenever my slow pace will get me there

I could probably write more specifically what I look for in muscle worship, but I enjoy what you’ve been able to do with it, especially the rapey vibe caption

>>11402745
ah, sorry; the rape one was actually a super gratuitous one on my part, because i was unable to conceptually sexualize biceps like i intended, so the entire caption is basically just sexist filler, sorry. but i'm glad you like it anyway, haha. but please do tell me what you were looking for. i know your original request phrased that the girls were explicitly cumming from observing your muscle, but i didn't naturally ever find myself afforded the opportunity to do that dialogue, so i guess objectively anything i've done so far has fallen short

of the batch of images i'm still on, you can probably tell that in my last caption, the expression isn't as passionate as the previous ones, and that reflects in the caption being far more composed. the next (and last) of the batch was going to be the same, because of the more passionate gens in the set, i didn't feel uniquely inspired by any of them as i did the first three of the batch. the gen by another genner i was going to caption after the next (and last) of the batch is this one >>11396787
>https://files.catbox.moe/dznkz9.png
and it's honestly much more falling-in-love or fangirling than /just/ passionate, which i think affords opportunity to be much more visceral (and less composed/ more stream of consciousness) with the dialogue, so i can probably manage to spin that one as outright cumming, but if there's anything else you were hoping for, then by all means do put me onto it, because the opportunity to caption passionate expressions is literally zero (0) outside of the gens i requested and graciously was given specifically for your request, so it's basically speak now or forever hold your peace

>>11402745
well, it's definitely a good thing you told me i was missing the mark on your request, but using the limited time you have to only vaguely say so without elaborating definitely kills my motivation to continue taking what i now know are shots in the dark at properly fulfilling your request. i might just move on from the passionate expression batch of gens the genner made for me and just default to whatever i'd caption unprovoked, at this point, maybe saving the "falling-in-love/ fangirling" gen for a rainy day, because it's even more passionate than the set of gens the i've been captioning so far, so it'd be a waste to just knowingly take a shot in the dark on it. the rape caption i made was the least muscle fetish-like of all of them, so it being your fav suggests that you meant masculinity, not muscle fetishism, which i do all the time regardless of the request, because i like traditional gender roles. it was also an expression i couldn't even spin as passionate, and the caption would've worked on just any lowkey expression, which defeated the purpose of the set of gens and how rare the expression they were going for is, anyway. so, yeah; today was a lazy day for me, anyway, but, again, it'd be a waste, i think, to just knowingly continue missing the mark at this point, so until you elaborate on what you were actually looking for, i won't do any more, i guess. i don't mean for this to be providing negative incentive for you telling me i missed the mark at all; it's you doing so without elaborating on how i could do better that produced this outcome, for now. sorry

>>11402747
>>11403283
No, I meant muscle fetishism lol. I never said anything disparaging about your work, I think you’ve done a good job, and came at it from an angle that isn’t traditional to my viewing. I’m not on the thread every day, as I’ve got a busy schedule. So I apologize if absence is taken for disinterest or ridicule. Do you have a discord?

>>11403327
i have a discord, but i don't really think it's worth taking this to discord, sorry. i'm kind of running out of ways to fulfill your request, because my last attempt at doing so already was so light it was basically nothing

but even if you say you meant muscle fetishism, i'm not understanding how my last caption is your fav. but that isn't the main thing, anyway; the main thing is you saying >>11402745
>I could probably write more specifically what I look for in muscle worship, but I enjoy what you’ve been able to do with it
you did not elaborate. idk why you still haven't elaborated. do you not want to? my entire second post was just explaining the note you left me on. i'm glad you appreciate what i've done so far, but i thought the way you phrased your request was the full picture. you've now told me i don't have the full picture. again, i'm glad my deliveries so far weren't completely forfeit, but at this point this is like trying to squeeze blood from a stone, sorry. is you elaborating private, or something

>>11403333
You’ve already fulfilled my requests 5x over, you made a bunch of captions for the same concept, and I appreciate that. I’ve honestly been pleasantly surprised you were so dedicated to make more than one caption, and again, I appreciate that.

The rape one was my favorite because it felt more slutty and, honestly, I could feel more passion with it, probably because you’ve described your previous enjoyment of the fetish and it’s a more natural right for you. In a similar vein, me writing prose for muscle worship captions would come off much more naturally. I’m a writer, I’ve written full length stories to the internet about muscle growth/worship/draining, etc. I’m just a lazy fuck who’d rather see someone else’s take on my fetish.

I asked for your discord because I appreciated the dedication, rather than elaborating in private. Yes, probably future conversations on it, but nothing about this.

Regardless, it’s no matter. And i don’t think it’s that hard to write muscle fetish stuff, like most other fetishes. I already kind of didn’t want to ask you to do specific stuff because you called some aspects of it try hardy, which to me, it will be. And with that, I just wanted to see your own take on it.

Stuff like, “holy shit, you’re so big. I love your muscles. Your biceps are gigantic. Your forearms are bigger than my thighs. I could lick those abs all day. I want you to break by back with those arms. Dominate me” etc. yada yada, same old shit. Just complete lust for muscles and dominance, expanded of course but you know.

>>11403378
>Yes, probably future conversations on it, but nothing about this.
i don't really get what this means, sorry. you just wanted my discord to talk about unrelated stuff? well i guess that's fine, but i struggle with managing my time and procrastinate a lot, and i'm pretty unfamiliar with just talking to people, so idk what you're expecting. i'm not necessarily against it, but i don't get what the point of it would be
>I already kind of didn’t want to ask you to do specific stuff because you called some aspects of it try hardy, which to me, it will be. And with that, I just wanted to see your own take on it.
well, again, it's just the "johnny bravo" angle of the guy unprovoked flexing his muscles that i would struggle to entertain, sorry; it's just not my style. with the ones i did, it's the girl unprovoked lusting over the guy, so i could manage it. i did say i could try meeting you halfway on the "johnny bravo" angle knowing you like it, but i didn't feel the opportunity for it arose with the batch of gens i did. with the one by the other genner i haven't done yet, i could consciously try to have some input by the guy, but idk if i can manage unprovoked even still
>Stuff like, “holy shit, you’re so big. I love your muscles. Your biceps are gigantic. Your forearms are bigger than my thighs. I could lick those abs all day. I want you to break by back with those arms. Dominate me” etc. yada yada, same old shit. Just complete lust for muscles and dominance, expanded of course but you know.
well, i don't identify as a writer, i can probably count the amount of books i've read on one (1) hand, and i've barely read any fanfiction or erotica, but even though i consider myself a verbose caption maker, the amount of words afforded in any caption is actually extremely limiting or me; i can't imagine doing justice to so many body parts in a single caption, so i tried to dedicate each caption to a single one. but even in that, when it came to biceps, i managed nothing

>>11403378
i guess i lost my own point formatting my last post, because the character limit was constraining for me, having quoted so much of your post in it. but i guess in it i failed to say, i do not understand how your quote of:
>Stuff like, “holy shit, you’re so big. I love your muscles. Your biceps are gigantic. Your forearms are bigger than my thighs. I could lick those abs all day. I want you to break by back with those arms. Dominate me” etc. yada yada, same old shit. Just complete lust for muscles and dominance, expanded of course but you know.
is meaningfully distinct from anything i've done on the subject matter so far. just many different muscles being mentioned in the same scenario? when you ended that with
>expanded of course but you know.
i assume you mean with added detail. but- again-, i can't do that while being verbose, since there are only so many words afforded to me in any given caption, so i had to split up each body part into its own caption. i only managed to do it with forearms and chest, but failed to do the same with forearms, which ended up being your favorite, for a reason i also don't understand, even though you just elaborated on why. because it was "slutty"? well, rape is a conventionally sexual topic, so i feel it is afforded more explicitly sexual dialogue. with the chest one, since i referenced feeling one's heartbeat through it, i drew parallels between that and erections being engorged with blood, but that is as conventionally sexual as muscle gets. i've never consciously thought of muscle myself before now, so if there is a more conventionally sexual way to do muscle, you will have to spell it out for me

otherwise, you suggest that because i like rape that the rape caption came more naturally to me. well, i don't mean to be put you on the spot, but it does feel like a backhanded compliment, since it's implicitly saying that the muscle words i produced before weren't as natural. you have to spell out how they weren't. sorry

>>11403390
>i only managed to do it with forearms and chest, but failed to do the same with forearms,
>same with forearms
>forearms
biceps*
>well, i don't mean to be put you on the spot
i originally phrased this as "be rude", but failed to delete the "be" from it. my fault

I wish you all the best. I think we’re failing to create an equal wavelength of understanding and it’s hindering the conversation. I’m very appreciative of all the work you’ve given me, especially giving your time and dedication to it. From a content standpoint, I think I’m forcing you to create something you don’t understand, and that’s unfair to you. You’re not being rude, and you don’t need to apologize. You’ve done a great service, and I’ll forever enjoy it. Thank you.

>>11403453
well, i'm glad you don't think i was being mean, because i do believe i can honestly say i was just trying to extract information from you. but i do believe i have not received such, despite my efforts. i would like to repeat my phrasing of >>11403333
>but at this point this is like trying to squeeze blood from a stone, sorry. is you elaborating private, or something
i was already at my wit's end when i wrote this. look at it from my perspective: your time is extremely limited, so even when i responded to your one-sentence original feedback with a near max-character reply in less than 15 minutes, you were unable to reply to me for another 23 hours. i said over and over in no uncertain terms- across two (2) replies, the first made in <15m and the second made after 21 hours- that your feedback only succeeded in giving me doubts and nothing else. my second reply literally said explicitly that i cannot rationally even attempt a delivery anymore with these doubts, so you NEED to elaborate in order to receive another delivery

following this, in replying to me 23 hours after your original reply, you STILL make NO ATTEMPT TO ELABORATE, despite my explicit pleas across two (2) replies, the second being a double reply telling you MUST elaborate, or else i cannot continue. so right away, if i were not there to continue trying to squeeze blood from the stone that is you, it realistically would've been another 24 hours of dead time, by your design, despite my- again- explicit pleas for otherwise

then, finally, and even on the same night, you replied with CONTEXT, FOR THE FIRST TIME. but, to me, it only raises even more questions, and answers literally nothing. i explicitly ask you >>11403390
>i do not understand how your quote of [quote] is meaningfully distinct from anything i've done on the subject matter so far. just many different muscles being mentioned in the same scenario?
you REFUSE TO ANSWER, now LEAVING FOREVER. let alone implying i delivered unnaturally

>>11403453
>>11403511
i ran out of space in my last post. but, yeah; i am just moving on at this point, then. again, i will repeat for the third time: this has been like trying to squeeze blood from a stone

i do understand that you explicitly expressed apprehension about what you were specifically looking for, literally saying >>11403378
>I already kind of didn’t want to ask you to do specific stuff because you called some aspects of it try hardy, which to me, it will be. And with that, I just wanted to see your own take on it.
but subject matter you think is my limit is different from you seemingly making it your life's goal to ONLY VAGUELY GESTURE TOWARDS MY MISSING CONTEXT, then REFUSE TO RECONCILE MY DOUBT FOLLOWING. it was just extremely tiring. as i have been saying repeatedly in no uncertain terms, i did NOT find your feedback sufficient. sorry. again, you only gave me doubts as to whether i was meeting your expectations properly. never reconciled. not to me

>>11403517
>i do understand that you explicitly expressed apprehension about what you were specifically looking for
i do understand that you explicitly expressed apprehension about [stating]* what you were specifically looking for

File: file.png (2.15 MB, 1024x1536)

2.15 MB PNG

>>11386986
>>11386988
Actual genner here, you'd probably have more luck on /ddg/ or /slop/ on /trash/. I also checked around and unfortunately while that doujin is peak there seems to be no support for the artist's style anywhere (no pics on booru and no lora either).

I got this doujin idea for a giantess who has a petite short figure. She is depressed because she wants to be treated like a petite girl but thats literally impossible. She reveals to the guy shes with that her life is depressing because she just wants to be thrown around and dominated but she can't because shes a giantess. The guy does the typical anime protagonist thing and steps up the plate and starts abusing her and beating up her clit. She is reluctant at first but starts getting into it, she gets so into it that when she cums she forgets hes there and closes her legs which crushes him. Then she goes not again and picks up her phone to call someone

File: f3784g.png (2.94 MB, 1840x1840)

2.94 MB PNG

edit #95. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11401889
>https://files.catbox.moe/f3784g.png

File: 1761177897908137.png (2.89 MB, 1840x1840)

2.89 MB PNG

edit #96. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11401908

File: 1760734387724337.png (2.36 MB, 2048x1536)

2.36 MB PNG

racism warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11398467

edit #97

captionless version:
https://files.catbox.moe/qjc6k3.png

File: 1759345740427962.png (2.43 MB, 1152x2016)

2.43 MB PNG

misandry warning (kinda). original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11387320/#11387692

edit #98

with this one my hands were tied with the typesetting options- even though i originally thought "not having to standardize paragraph spacing!!! fuck yeah!!!"-, so i'm not entirely satisfied with it, but i did what i could. but the actual reason i'm saying anything at all here is because above her right ear, the original has some ai schizo shit going on. at first i only tried to select and change the color of the skin-colored blotch of color, but i found that trying to match it with lighter blotch below it looked bad (and i simply didn't realize until then that the lighter blotch even looked bad in itself since it's relatively small), so i ended up selecting the lighter blotch and trying to match them both with the light blue of her hair. but i quickly realized that without any texture, changing their color was FUBAR. i was going to just send it as is, but then i realized that i was afforded the unique contextual opportunity to just drench it in black, so that's exactly what i did. i actually sampled some dark around the area for it, then took the healing tool to it to add some noise. it turned out okay. i didn't try that hard with it, so it's just good enough, for me

another thing i learned with that selecting-and-colorizing trial-and-error was that it's not enough to only flatten the color curve of a selection to white to spot stray pixels; you have to flatten it to black, too. even if it's counter-intuitive, when i first decided on trying to fill the matte color blotches with black, i tried colorizing the selections, and found that what i thought were pretty great selections were actually extremely bad when used for dark color. it's just because the unselected pixels on the border are way more visible when they differ. doing selections well is up there with drawing smegma as being stuff i hate doing, but it's a nice option to know you have

File: 20251101_141029_gimp-3.mp4 (3.9 MB, 1224x852)

3.9 MB MP4

yo, wtf... i had NO IDEA 4chan had a TWO MINUTE (120s) VIDEO LENGTH LIMIT!!!! i didn't even know something like that could be enforced on an imageboard. the full video is only 11 seconds longer (2:10), but here it is, anyway:
https://files.catbox.moe/wv5iml.mp4

i actually wasted so much time getting this within 4chan's file and video constraints. the goalposts kept moving, including me just fucking up and accidentally making it 1:19 (79s) rather than 1:59 (119s)

in any case, picrel is NOT (!) the finished product!!! but this thread was already on page 10 when i started trying to draw smegma, for the first time since edit #12, 2m16d (77 days) ago:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11339992/#11357118

so i just did the least to at least have something to bump the thread with

to start from the top, spoiler alert: i wanted to try drawing smegma again for edit #100, which is in two (2) edits. i figured it'd be VERY possible for me to do, now, having learned sooo much since about color choices (even if still entirely uneducated on color theory...), the importance of brush hardness (the biggest game changer... my tablet's brush still had 100 hardness from when i last tried drawing smegma several months ago...)... and that's all i needed to draw smegma confidently??? idk. edit #99 and #100 will be a two-part caption. i didn't originally intend to caption the first of the two, cause even though the guy is way fatter in it (which i prefer), his pants are pulled all the way up to his tummy, which i feel hides his gut somewhat, which was disappointing. but the expression was much less flattering to him (which i prefer), so i just thought it'd be nice to include, especially since i've never done a two-part caption before, so it fits celebrating 100 captions

another thing of note is that i wanted to try drawing male smegma, since i prefer girls having phimosis, and males having retracted foreskin. even as stressful as drawing smegma was, i assumed i could manage it, now

>>11408385
unfortunately, i ended up stressing myself out a lot this session, in becoming familiar with my drawing tablet keys again, and giving up on managing what i hoped to with them. for reference, all my edits have been made in gimp, and currently my tablet buttons are:
>k1 = ctrl + z = undo
>k2 = ctrl + y = redo
>k3 = space = pan (move)
>k4 = ctrl + space = zoom
>k5 = o = color picker tool
>k6 = p = paintbrush tool
i have unbound buttons still (even on the pen), but so far all i wanted otherwise was a hotkey like k3 and k4, but for changing brush size. the way k3 and k4 work is i hold the button, and by drawing with the cursor, it performs the action. in gimp the only way to get similar that i managed to find was ctrl+alt+scroll wheel up/down, but that doesn't seem useful for me, since i want basically a button to toggle drawing actions gaining the action. i found a reddit thread asking for the same dated five (5) years ago, and they were told to use krita (drawing program) instead:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GIMP/comments/i6obhj/changing_brush_size_with_a_tablet/

i also found a high-effort reddit comment answering a similar question, dated a year ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GIMP/comments/17t62hv/shortcut_keys_to_change_the_brush_size/

but i honestly just didn't bother trying to comprehend it. i don't know why this has to be so stressful and difficult. it was so exhausting looking into this only to give up on it in the end that i don't think i have the energy to try drawing smegma properly today... i will hopefully manage to proofread and typeset edit #100 today (just borrowing the colors for the text and stroke [outline] from edit #99, as well as just copying its stroke opacity, hopefully), so i'd be able to focus exclusively on drawing the smegma to be able to get it out the door. it'd just be a matter of putting in the time. i really think i can do it

>>11408385
>>11408386
i honestly forgot to mention the following, so i maybe could've spared making this a three-part post had i remembered... sorry. but the reference images in the video are these:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=6324718
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=14417335

i REALLY wanted to do dripping smegma. i mention it like every time i write smegma, because it's so gratuitous. but the second image (which affords such) has no smegma on the glans itself, which i don't personally see the point of, so i used the same one mamimi smegma drawing i linked so many times last thread as a reference for texture and smearing. i'll hopefully be able to manage a mix of both, but we'll see... i only have to try...

also, i should say that this is some pretty gratuitous stuff to do for edit #100 (especially since i always include politically incorrect contempt towards the guy if you can see him), so i don't expect anyone else to like it, lmao. but with my preference for girl pps being unretracted, i felt doing girl smegma would be way easier, so it wouldn't have been challenging myself very much had i done so. maybe i'll try girl smegma freely later, but i can forgive girls for not having smegma pps, so it wouldn't always make every caption better, imo. but i pretty much hate when guys don't have smegma, so i might add smegma to men a lot, depending on how much effort it takes for me to manage something i feel okay with

>>11408391
>but with my preference for girl pps being unretracted, i felt doing girl smegma would be way easier, so it wouldn't have been challenging myself very much had i done so
well, in hindsight, a horsecock or dog dick (pps i consider girl pps) would be way, way, waaaay harder to add smegma to... but it didn't occur to me to possibly add smegma to any until just now, after reading back my posts. i actually do have a horsecock dickgirl gen i'd like to add smegma too, but there /is/ just soo much more surface area for it that it'd be like literally dozens of retracted male pp smegma edits combined... maybe one day, but just adding smegma to a retracted foreskin pp is the current goal ahead of me, which i still haven't even given an honest shot yet. so i'm not trying to get ahead of myself, here. plus, the gen in question i have my eye on has waay more complicated rendering and lighting, so i don't know if i can even convincingly add smegma to it, anyway, even though i still maintain that the aforementioned "same one mamimi smegma drawing" does smegma with no rendering at all, despite the extremely detailed rendering of everything else otherwise, so maybe it'll be possible yet. but still... just lots of drawing...

>>11393412
>to push yourself so hard you can barley even move
what is this referring to? im confused

>>11409021
i meant to imply that the viewer was smelly and physically exhausted from working out, but the closest i get to saying so outright is "y-your only value is g-gaining muscle" in the last paragraph

>>11409024
>you should kill yourself for working out
I don't want to sound like a hater but this is ass imo, i feel like it could've worked better if you set it up as anon having been caught masterbaiting because that sounds like a more justified and believable version of misandry, also humiliating.
Just my two cents on the subject

>>11409026
>I don't want to sound like a hater but this is ass imo
well, this is a very crass way to say it, but ok. but i will not praise a man for masturbating, and i find it embarrassing to think a man should be praised for masturbating. the girl in the image is turned on to the point of tears by the viewer (as stated in the caption), because he worked out without showering. her rudeness is inconsiderate for doing so, considering straight women will be forced to endure his smell, which is a result of him performing the traditionally masculine role of exerting himself physically. masturbation is not a traditionally masculine act, so i will not praise a man for doing such

>>11409027
>her rudeness is inconsiderate for doing so
her rudeness is [from it being]* inconsiderate for [him to do]* so

>>11409027
>praised
"kys" doesn't sound like praise senpai.
>the girl in the image is turned on to the point of tears by the viewer
but i get your angle, i disagree with it but i get it

>>11409030
idk what there is to disagree with, and i don't understand how you say you "get it" while "disagreeing" with it. she is calling him inconsiderate for turning her on. if you're being semantic about the word "praise", then i just won't describe it any, because i felt the caption spoke for itself as to its angle

File: 00044-366771049.png (2.03 MB, 1248x1824)

2.03 MB PNG

edit #99. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/LbRAjBiA
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > 00044-366771049.png

File: 00012-442582641.png (2.1 MB, 1248x1824)

2.1 MB PNG

racism warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/DG4RkQRJ
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > 00012-442582641.png

edit #100

uncensored version: https://files.catbox.moe/yoaq53.png
captionless version: https://files.catbox.moe/yyq9jn.png

ok!!! 100 edits, in 102 days (3m,10d)!!! my pace definitely fluctuated a lot, and i eventually just started settling on an edit every other day (unless i was going through a batch, in which case i at least tried to pick up the pace, so as to not be stuck on it forever). idk if i will ever get to 200 edits, especially anytime soon, but we'll see, haha

i spoiled it earlier, but i wanted to try drawing smegma again for edit 100, which as i said >>11408385, i haven't tried since edit #12, now 79 days (2m18d) ago. i honestly hadn't even picked up the pen to give it an honest shot until a few hours ago, and it probably took me less than an hour to produce the smegma in picrel, haha. i am NOT saying it is good, nor am i proud of it!!! BUT, it WAS fun to draw!!! i never knew DRAWING could be FUN!!! i seriously stressed so much when typesetting and for so long after about having to try drawing the smegma again, but it was so fun that i think i'll violate gens by trying to add smegma to them at my leisure, from now on, haha. by far the biggest gamechanger was just just reducing the brush hardness from 100... it reduced my stress to wanting to die to it actually being FUN... i also freely added jitter to the brush (the stock value is 0.20, and i went as low as 0.2 and as high as 0.40, depending on brush size), which i think helped a bit. in the end, i couldn't add shadow to convey actual mass- let alone dripping- like i wanted, and i used the smudge tool as a crutch to hide how low-effort the smegma was. but i hope i'll get better at it over time...

File: 2025-11-03 15-40-02.mp4 (857 KB, 856x700)

857 KB MP4

>>11410045
another thing worth saying for edit #100 is that the main things that upped my typesetting game were:
>manually reducing line spacing for my font of choice to a single pixel between the lowest letter and the highest letter (for my font of choice ["pally bold"], that is the lowercase "j" and "f", which i do exclusive lines of to determine the line spacing before starting on a caption)
>contextually aligning text to the left or right, to minimize potentially overlapping points of interest
>manually shortening lines to produce aesthetically-pleasing patterns, and to minimize overlapping points of interest
had i had the sauce since the beginning, my captions would've been super good from the start. other stuff like converting the aspect ratio for standardizing font size is just OCD stuff that i'm sure other caption makers wouldn't necessarily care for

dunno what else to say besides, yay, 100 captions, lmao

>>11410045
i exported unedited smegma versions of this edit:
https://files.catbox.moe/rbqdj2.png
https://files.catbox.moe/760qpz.png (uncensored)

original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11410099
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/CD5BDRrC
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > 00003-2422843731.png

same warning applies (i've neglected to provide a smegma warning when it was only in the gen and not the caption before, but warning for that too, i guess)

>>11410045
>(the stock value is 0.20, and i went as low as 0.2 and as high as 0.40, depending on brush size)
>as low as 0.2
i meant as low as 0.10

>>11410045
in hindsight a simple improvement would've been realizing that the leftmost part of the smegma should reach all the way to the top of the dick. the way i drew it, it doesn't compensate for the fact that a retracted foreskin makes symmetrical wrinkles, where the apex is on top of the dick, the very part i stopped short of adding smegma to. but it is my first attempt at drawing smegma on a retracted foreskin dick, so i should internalize it the more i try it. i actually compensated for similar on the frenulum (the underside of the cockhead), but did not think about the opposite end, evidently

>>11410854
/d/ is a hentai board, which refers to drawings, so irl (in real life) content isn't allowed. i don't know which other boards have caption threads, but maybe you can check >>>/b/ or >>>/trash/

File: kchwng1_19744141982778249(...).png (1.42 MB, 1536x1024)

1.42 MB PNG

rape/somno warning. original by @kchwng1 on twitter:
https://x.com/kchwng1/status/1974414198277824969

edit #101

mirror:
https://files.catbox.moe/pv4qif.jpg

i think i'm going to stop forcing what i said i'd do here >>11402569
>just defaulting to my usual, which i think i've started absentmindedly using dickgirl and cis girl images on and off, so i'll probably keep doing that (provided i'm uniquely inspired to caption a cis girl, since i don't even really like cis girls for their own merits)
the thing is, i hadn't yet realized it here >>11385684
>my personal tier list of stuff to caption is:
>uncut pp > horsecock > knot > [power gap] > inverted nipples
>... and that's kinda it. i have other preferences like fat girls and flat chests, but neither of them have to be cis girls to be such, and they kinda fall into the general concept-i-take-to-its-logical-conclusion thing as any other fetish i've done, so they only hold so much weight (no pun intended) on their own
but i actually value taboo above all else. even if a girl has the cutest phimosis pp i ever done did see, if all i can manage for it is a conventionally sexual caption, i've been finding myself wishing i could caption cis girls i can spin as taboo sooner. so while i originally tried doing cis girls between dickgirls to stretch the dickgirls, i not only don't need to anymore- since i have plenty of dickgirls to caption now-, but a dickgirl caption being obligatory rather than what inspires me most at any given moment is kind of killing my mojo, so, again, i just won't force such. you might find me doing a deluge of cis girl captions, if it's just the way things end up going

also, i meant to take back what i said here, but forgot to, since i didn't just want to make a text post doing so >>11406842
>it's not enough to only flatten the color curve of a selection to white to spot stray pixels; you have to flatten it to black, too
in hindsight, saturating things dark only demands a dark curve flattening test

>>11377784 >>11377782
The /d/ caption renascence has begun anons

>>11376232
>>11377782
>>11377784
i just noticed there's currently a (5-day old) caption thread on /trash/:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/search/subject/caption/
>>>/trash/caption
>>>/trash/78913297
>General JOI/JOE/Caption Thread #9 (Jerk Off Instructions, Encouragement, and Captions)
the subject field confused me, but skimming through the thread, it seems it's not JOI/JOE-exclusive. and a thread being 5 days old on /trash/ is insane, considering shit 404s (they have no 3rd-party archive) in literally <3 hours for them right now

but even though i always considered myself a verbose caption maker, i don't really feel i belong there. even reducing the line spacing on my font of choice ("pally bold") made me worried i'd be able to be far more verbose and would get carried away with it, but literally (literally) everyone in the thread, as far as i can tell, just writes straight prose as captions, just extending the image to afford space for the caption. while typesetting can still be involved in such a caption, i feel it being divorced from what i do- where the space and aesthetic typesetting opportunity afforded to me is contingent on the negative space in any given image- would make me the odd one out. plus, everyone in there clearly exclusively (or nearly exclusively) consumes prose, and with the limited space afforded to my typesetting, anything i've ever done starts and ends in a sex scene with no story, let alone one with a conventional structure. i don't even know how to begin writing prose, since i'm unfamiliar with how to handle the downtime between the smut. but it's better to know it exists than not, at least. i guess when i looked for a caption thread a few times before, i just caught them with their pants around their ankles, even though they're really good about keeping their thread up on such a fast board

>>11411841
>but literally (literally) everyone in the thread, as far as i can tell, just writes straight prose as captions, just extending the image to afford space for the caption
ok, i started actually looking at each image one by one, from the top, and noticed that some that don't just extend the image exist. but they are definitely few and far between. i feel i am a caption maker, and virtually everyone there are writers and their audience. which is not a bad thing, but i'm just saying

>>11411841
>considering shit 404s (they have no 3rd-party archive) in literally <3 hours for them right now
idk why i said "3rd-party". sorry. i literally linked a 3rd-party archive for /trash/. i meant the inline archive 4chan has for probably every other board, where threads can be viewed for a period of time (depending on the board) before 404ing

>>11411841
i posted one (1) of my captions in the thread >>>/trash/79041637. i don't think i will make it a habit, though. the subject matter i do is vastly different from what most anyone else there does, plus i only really do taboo. not really trying to post niche content (complete with a content warning) in a thread i'd already be the odd one out in

File: 1761676976242438.png (3.44 MB, 1376x2304)

3.44 MB PNG

edit #102. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11405788

File: 2lgagc.png (3.04 MB, 1376x2304)

3.04 MB PNG

edit #103. original by 0.4 in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11406556
>https://files.catbox.moe/2lgagc.png

File: luciabooty10-1.png (898 KB, 2000x1280)

898 KB PNG

im making captions of my own art because im a fat loser.
how does this look and read?

>>11414654
the writing is super good!!! i'm just the caption maker who's been bumping the thread when it gets low on the board with a caption, and what i do with captions is very limited, so i can only comment on so much, haha. but i saw the following program linked in the >>>/trash/caption thread boilerplate (they don't have a thread up right now, though):
https://desuarchive.org/trash/search/subject/caption/
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/78913297/
https://github.com/substantialpickle/Capper

i don't know what's possible in the program, and maybe capturing your specific formatting wouldn't be possible in it, but if it doesn't compromise your workflow, perhaps it could streamline the process

otherwise, it depends on the intent, but i would say that the verbosity of the "oh, these?"-type dialogue is conventionally intended to be interpreted as lowkey, despite the clear, blatant, explicit emphasis on sexual content. you can look at anything tagged with the meme for reference:
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/oh-these-my-boobies
https://e621.net/posts?tags=oh_these%3F
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=oh_these%3F_%28meme%29
https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=oh_these%3F_my_boobies%3F

but skimming through other examples, i'd say the verbose part being all caps- when not using an all caps only font- is unusual, and i can see why: it suggests that the speaker is raising their voice, rather than the lingering, seductiveness you probably intend for. again, it does depend on your personal intent, but switching to a font that affords italics, and using such for such words might be more conventional. or if you don't mind inflating the typesetting time, you can change the color of specific words, too, as if to make them bolder, to stand out more

>>11414654
>>11414691
ran out of space, but lastly, while this part might be arguable (unless it isn't, but i just don't know any source to cite for it), i've never thought about hyphen use until i started making captions a few months ago, but once i started, i began heavily questioning where hyphens should be applied. at first i spoke as i always had, but then i went through a phase of adding them between any words i felt were a pair (i.e. pulled up). but the moment i dropped such and reverted back to what i had always been doing (no hyphens unless strictly necessary, [i.e. "criss-cross applesauce"]) was when i thought about the difference between "bent over" and "bend over". i was about to write a caption with "bent over" with a hyphen between it, but then i realized i somehow intuitively would never have added a hyphen to the present tense version of it. i am not sure i can put into words why, but ever since then, i felt i understood hyphens- at least to a way i feel confident about-, so i abstain from them unless after plugging any given expression into a search engine, i see that they're conventionally written with hyphens. i had to spend a lot of time doing such to make sure i wasn't missing out on anything, and in the end, i probably arbitrarily, contextually disagreed with how stuff is conventionally written, or found the minority dissenting from conventional formatting, then discarded such as negligible. but generally i feel i am confident in my current hyphen use. so i'm not saying your habitual use of hyphens is necessarily wrong, but in many cases it's at least unconventional, and unnecessary

now, mind you, the oxford comma is ALSO unconventional, but i add it every time (barring contextual exceptions, or if i simply forget). but besides the sentence hitting different due to the pause, the oxford comma ALWAYS improves legibility. so conventional can go suck one, objectively. but it's still worth recognizing what it is, to know how you stand on it

>>11414695
I use Paint.net for my captioning, and the way it handles fonts is kinda terrible. If I want italics, then everything else needs to be italics.
Changing fonts needs an entirely new formatted text layer, etc. I can do it, i was kinda lazy this time around.
Even then, this was kind of a test run in a way just to see how well i can do it.

I've been an "oxford comma" user for decades now and I never thought about it and never thought to change it.

I understand the whole hyphen thing, I just like keeping words compact in some ways.

Thank u tho, i will keep these in mind. i will always be drawing my mime OC and making captions with her.

>>11414723
sorry to hear about paint.net. i'm not familiar with editing programs or anything myself, only ever managing to do the least with gimp and gimp alone. also, of course, some fonts just have a zillion different options, so it's not just italics; it could be bold... or maybe that's it, idk. fancier caption makers might know the true extent of the freedom you have here, but i've never done anything of the sort myself, so i'm unaware of it. but it appears you don't have the freedom to do anything but all caps, even if you wanted to, anyway. so it is fine; i was just putting you onto other possible options for such

the hyphen thing is perfectly fine, haha. i do dissent from conventional at my leisure, so it is just personal preference, in the end. and no problem!!! i didn't have much space to respond to your self-deprecating remark about captioning your own art, but i don't see how any part of that is inferior to other options, haha. it's you seeing your vision through, entirely by your own hands!!! and it's beautiful art to boot, you know!!!

>>11414729
thank u, im just my own biggest critic when it comes to my art, a lot of other people say they like it but i usually have a different opinion.
and i would be bordering on quitting for each image i made.

but making captions on pieces has actually made me change my mind on my stuff recently. so i think this is gonna be in my workflow loop.
and probably change from paint.net to something else.

>>11414737
yeah, i've heard of paint.net, but it being so limited when it comes to typesetting is really shocking. i never even imagined such a thing were possible. i have no recommendations for otherwise, though, but i have seen a genner from >>>/d/ddg recommend a paid program for editing here:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11399824/#11400053
>Is there an ai that you can feed images to caption like so?
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11399824/#11400233
>I don't think so, Gen AI doesn't do what you think it does. You can definitely gen the character and then use a LLM to make the caption. Put it together in PS. Hear me out, Affinity Photo2 is cheap, my fav software for editing and you'll learn a real skill, an actual real skill!
i don't know anything about editing software to in any way know what makes one better than others (besides the availability of resources for it from it having a huge market share), so i wouldn't be able to tell you the upsides of this program over any other. but it's a rec, anyway, if you're looking to commit to any for the long haul, even if it is clearly paid, so maybe you should realize what you're missing before going for it, but idk

and, damn; i'm just a caption maker (not an artist), but that sounds super rough. it's a familiar story, of course, in every artist being their own worst critic. it definitely necessitates the absence of complacency, which always suggests humility, and self-awareness, which tends to be healthier than not, but it can of course develop into full-blown... i don't have the vocabulary, but maybe dysphoria? to the point of being unable to look at your own work objectively, i mean, since seeing it for what it is is just rational. so it's a slippery slope, and i don't mean to foster your unhealthy thoughts, but it's at least not exclusively a bad thing, you know. but i'm glad you can find fulfillment in your work even so, by extrapolating from it, in writing. it sounds like a healthy path forward

>>11414744
paint.net isn't that bad, it just needs a bit of a nudge from me to work a bit better.
I might take time to experiment with different softwares, make captions of my previous images, etc.

hopefully this captioning era with me doesnt make me feel like shit anymore lol.

thank u for conversing with me lol, not a lot of people do that with me here. or anywhere else.

>>11414752
you're welcome, haha. i'm a huge yapper, so i'm just glad you'd even put up with me, lmao. and i hope caption making continues livening the creative process for you!!! godspeed in anything you pursue following!!!

>>11414654
one last thing about my lame caption of my own art.

if anyone has good gooner/porn-terms for asses, assholes, tits and dicks, please let me know. i would love to know the vocabulary for better captioning and all that

>>11414767
i just searched "gooner captions booru", and the first link was this, if it helps:
https://hgoon.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&pid=0

but otherwise, i scraped the twitter of a blacked caption maker who used vocabulary like this. not that you're trying to read that desu, but i can't be arsed to read them all and transcribe the gooner words for you... sorry. so if you can be arsed, here it is:
https://catbox.moe/c/l5r90a

i only bothered making an album of the 85 image edits, but i linked a pixeldrain in the description of the full 492 file (1.18gb) twitter rip, which is mostly video edits. pixeldrain links are wordfiltered on 4chan, so you have to deal with catbox descriptions not supporting hyperlinks... sorry

shameful text bump, since there're only four (4) threads in front of us on the board, and i haven't even started on a caption to be anywhere near ready to bump the thread with one

sorry. i've been trying to force a caption on specific subject matter for just about the entirety of the four (4) days since my last caption, but idk if i'll be able to manage it. if i can't i'll just drop the subject matter and caption something else

lol ive been too busy making captions for my own porn. example: >>11414654
i would love to create a caption for someone but i dont feel like i have the skill for it.

>>11417039
idk what skill you think you don't have, haha. you're far more verbose than most!!! all that's missing is the request, if that's what you're looking for

but time is for sure a bitch. feels bad

>>11417053
I would be down for a request, desu. It might raise my skill, a lot faster than captioning my own art.
I just have to find someone lol.

File: 00009-1769301484.png (2.2 MB, 1824x1248)

2.2 MB PNG

edit #104. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/yShQlDpI
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > 00009-1769301484.png

even though it's been a month and a half- despite my realizing the mistake the day after-, i just went ahead and fixed the mistake with edit #82 >>11386642. fixed version here:
https://files.catbox.moe/m9r3g0.png

i outlined the mistake here >>11387234
>here are exports of the unedited stroke (outline) layers vs. the paint bucket filled layers, and you can clearly see that the complexity of the gradient is NOT PRESERVED!!!!!
>changing the color turned virtually all gradient into being the boldest color. paint bucket filing existing stroke (outline) layers should only be treated as a test, since it a destructive edit- in it literally compromising the integrity of the stroke (outline) layer- and should therefore not reach the finished product
it only affected the male text's stroke- since as i said >>11386642, i just chose the first color i tried for the female text's stroke, without paint bucket filling it to change its color (which would've been the mistake)-, which was why i was lazy about going back to fix it. but i honestly forgot about this at a certain point, but only just got reminded of it again somehow, so i made a note to remind myself to bother fixing it, despite myself

File: 00046-190771630.png (2.06 MB, 1248x1824)

2.06 MB PNG

smegma warning. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11418348
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/SfYWBR6Q
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > Request > 00046-190771630.png

edit #105

>>11417231
i just noticed that /trash/ has had their caption thread up again, for just over a day now:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/search/subject/caption/
>>>/trash/caption
>>>/trash/79255869

maybe you can find a request there, or post your captions there either way, if you'd like

>>11376232
>AI is fine
y tho

>>11421489
well, there are many ways to answer this question. the first is that i didn't make the boilerplate; i just copy pasted it from the previous OP and added new links, so you'd have to ask them, but they made their own gens (ai-generated images), so there's you likely reason. secondly, the question should never be "why", it should be "why not", since the burden of proof is not on that which exists, but that which imposes. and thirdly, i personally only edit ai over real art, because i find genners infinitely more approachable than real artists (no offence to genners), because i feel the barrier for entry to their legacy is far lower, so i feel less self-conscious about violating their works with the most gratuitous shoehorned-in fetishes possible without their consent

and while i'm text posting, i may as well say that not having a caption out by tonight is my fault. i've been very good for a while now about getting a caption out every other day, i think (barring special exceptions such as making the selection to lighten the smegma in edit #84 >>11390696), but i kind of had an existential crisis after my last edit. when i said >>11411522
>i actually value taboo above all else. even if a girl has the cutest phimosis pp i ever done did see, if all i can manage for it is a conventionally sexual caption, i've been finding myself wishing i could caption cis girls i can spin as taboo sooner
as i explained in the post, until then, i was forcing dickgirls and cis girl on and off. i thought not forcing such would fix my doing "obligatory" captions, but i think since my last edit i realized that it's not just taboo i seek... it's something else, but i'm not sure what

i have written a caption, but i've been struggling with finding the motivation to proofread, typeset, and choose the stroke (outline) and text colors (if necessary) for it. i think what i enjoy most is taking a concept to its logical conclusion, and taboo is just a convenient entryway to such

>>11421527
i think just rattling off examples of taboos i like would be meandering on my struggle even i'm unsure of the problem of- let alone solution for-, but, i think the common denominator between my latest taboo captions is that they all had purpose: they were all confident in what they were going for, so i knew how to be as gratuitous as possible with them. i think those are where i'm most inspired. i thought maybe the gen had to uniquely inspire the caption, but it doesn't, really; i can shoehorn the fetish into an unrelated gen, and if the subject matter has that confidence, i can consider it a "solved" example of the subject matter, as narcissistic as that sounds. for example, more niche subject matter i've done includes period blood (edit #44 >>11367515), and horse pussy (edit #62 >>11375725), and i could revisit these if i so chose, but it would just be gratuity; i could just as easily move on and feel i did the concept justice the first time, and find solace in such

i think, in trying to put into words when i feel less inspired, my hangup must just be with conventional sexuality. i hate to sound like a porn-addicted coomer, but i really think i've grown tired of it. the reason i add rape, sexism, and racism (if i can) to every caption is because i feel they provide much-needed purpose to porn otherwise conceivably entirely devoid of such. but i feel i've currently exhausted anything calling to me as to its purpose. even in saying this, i don't feel i'm saying it right

ok, i thought about it, and i think i figured it out: i prefer insulting men more than praising women. across ALL my captions, (You)- the reader- are... subhuman. (You) are nothing more than your dick, or your muscles. or your dominance. (You) are demeaned, and insulted by my captions. to me, the hot part about rape isn't the woman's pleasure (or pain); it's the man fulfilling the traditionally masculine gender role by perpetrating the rape, and hating him for it is the hot part

>>11421527
>>11421528
well, trying to put it into words helped me get through my- again- bona fide existential crisis, about what inspires me. so i'm glad my introspection wasn't completely for naught, since before this, i really felt i was still struggling. so i'm glad i somehow started blog posting. sorry

anyway, i'm not sure what this'll mean for my captions going forward, but at least now i'm aware that i love to hate men, i guess, much more than i do appreciating women for their own merits. knowing this, i'll try to look at prospective gens to captions with a different eye. i mean, it's all i can do

shameful text bump as i languish in varying degrees of postulation, apathy, and laziness (the thread would've easily survived another night [and possibly far longer] since it's only in the middle of page 9 right now, but still)

i think i can amend the conclusion i came to on my tastes here >>11421528
>ok, i thought about it, and i think i figured it out: i prefer insulting men more than praising women. across ALL my captions, (You)- the reader- are... subhuman. (You) are nothing more than your dick, or your muscles. or your dominance. (You) are demeaned, and insulted by my captions. to me, the hot part about rape isn't the woman's pleasure (or pain); it's the man fulfilling the traditionally masculine gender role by perpetrating the rape, and hating him for it is the hot part
i think this isn't quite right; it feels very reductive. for reference- and to shamelessly turn my text post blog posting up to 11-, i rewatched this rap music video from 2018 (time flies):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0hMu9FUjmk

to me this shit is embarrassing. i mean, you can even tell from the thumbnail what you're getting into. i literally don't even have to elaborate, since by calling it "embarrassing", you get my complaint with it already. but to say it out loud, it's fucking ironic. i hate it. not gonna spend any more time dwelling on this than necessary, but the vocals of the main guy just has this grating ironic tone to it, and the entire music video is irony incarnate, despite depicting themes of sadism, torture, and a lack of remorse

it didn't help me realize my tastes- by virtue of being complete patronizing creative cancer- immediately, but i randomly remembered cringing myself into a black hole at it a bit after that recent viewing of it, and realized that at least part of the puzzle for me is SINCERITY, and PASSION. it's a fine line, but there's a (very meaningful) difference between a straight woman using men to debase herself, and male-exclusionary misandry

>>11422507
i thought i'd be able to end the post there, but i think i do have to make it a two-parter... again... sorry. to zero-in on this specific part of my quote i'd like to amend >>11421528
>to me, the hot part about rape isn't the woman's pleasure (or pain); it's the man fulfilling the traditionally masculine gender role by perpetrating the rape, and hating him for it is the hot part
i feel this is also reductive. the appeal of rape is very complicated- and i can easily lose sight of what i'm trying to say by getting into it-, so i'll try to only rationalize what i must to amended my aforementioned reductive explanation of what i see in rape

at its core, i like traditional gender roles- to the point of blatant sexism- because it is not only taboo, but provides... well, roles, so fundamental that sympathy with such appears to be your calling. or, such is how i see it, anyway. i can't imagine making content without such, since i feel it is the necessary axiom from which logic and immersion- in my universe- is extrapolated, so anything i make, you can look at it and go, "ah; it's because he's a man, and she's a woman, and if i lean into such, this content hits for me". gratuity without reason doesn't afford itself sympathy for its own merits, in my opinion. the first example of such that comes to mind is foot or armpit fetishism designed for people already into it. i very much enjoy when a girl is barefoot in a skirt (by which i mean not wearing shoes; socks do not diminish this), so i view the feet as an extrapolated version of no panties. likewise, i enjoy braless off-shoulder tops worn low enough to see the axillary fold (armpit), since i view that as basically confirming she's braless, similar to how i view seeing a girl's buttcrack under her skirt with no panties as removing plausible deniability for the "schrodinger's panties" angle. but these lead the viewer to appreciating these body parts; it is not the same as just out of context POV armpits or feet

>>11422507
>>11422508
another three-parter text post. but, anyway, the point i was /trying/ to get to was that the appeal is rape to me is definitely multi-faceted, so the woman's pleasure (or pain) is very much in fact part of it, and i should never have literally claimed otherwise; i've just been struggling with pinpointing what my basis for inspiration is, basically, so when i landed on sexism being the common denominator in all my content, and sexism against men getting me going more than sexism against women, i thought i had it all figured out, so i jumped the gun without realizing i was doing so. but rape can come in so many forms- and i like basically all of them besides just using the word "rape" when it's actually the most consensual, lovey-dovey sex imaginable (even though i've been guilty of such at times)-, so it's not worth getting into. but the nebulous idea i landed on is true: i prefer insulting men more than praising women. i enjoy women being injured, but i don't think there's much opportunity to insult them, so it ends up being that most of the verbosity in any given caption is about driving home how the man is the one to shoulder the burden of being taboo, and to make the woman such i basically just have her willingly be crushed beneath the taboo pressure of the guy, basically only making her taboo by proxy

idk. still thingken. will hopefully be arsed to drop something soon, but no promises, since i'm going through it creatively rn. sorry

File: Text_01.jpg (237 KB, 896x1152)

237 KB JPG

I'm not sure what's more shocking. The fact that this thread is still alive, or that fact that the texts keep getting longer and longer.

>>11377109
I normally despise this character. all of the sudden I can tolerate her a lot more.

>>11422507
>and realized that at least part of the puzzle for me is SINCERITY, and PASSION. it's a fine line, but there's a (very meaningful) difference between a straight woman using men to debase herself, and male-exclusionary misandry
>>11422508
>at its core, i like traditional gender roles- to the point of blatant sexism- because it is not only taboo, but provides... well, roles, so fundamental that sympathy with such appears to be your calling.
>so anything i make, you can look at it and go, "ah; it's because he's a man, and she's a woman, and if i lean into such, this content hits for me". gratuity without reason doesn't afford itself sympathy for its own merits
>>11422509
>i prefer insulting men more than praising women. i enjoy women being injured, but i don't think there's much opportunity to insult them, so it ends up being that most of the verbosity in any given caption is about driving home how the man is the one to shoulder the burden of being taboo, and to make the woman such i basically just have her willingly be crushed beneath the taboo pressure of the guy, basically only making her taboo by proxy
i think the final piece of the puzzle i was missing was subversion; it's the entire reason anything is hot- or, for a more descriptive word, thrilling-, to me. it was kind of already inherent to all these quotes, but still, i think i was worried about possibly getting lost in the sauce, and just being sexist against men for the sake of it. but if i keep subversion being the point in mind, i will never fail to do a caption justice. also, with this, i can amend the first quote: male-exclusionary misandry would be perfectly fine if it were subversive (that is to say, in this case, designed to turn a male on), similar to how a woman can outright refuse consent and manage the same. so, i think i can make captions with confidence, again. i hope to get into the practice again and drop one soon. dunno if i will ever typeset and drop the caption i felt lost on

>>11423073
all this is about rape too. oh my fucking god.

>>11423373
no one acknowledges my captions, so i don't care what you think. virtually the one and only feedback i get on anything i've posted ITT across months being "your text posts have been getting longer is literally just miserable. you can just continue providing no positive feedback, rather than only coming out of the woodworks to complain about my text posts and nothing else

>>11423379
i aint judging or anything, you may need to find some other place to post since caption people on 4chan are extremely nitpicky and shit

>>11423381
you literally said "all this is about rape too", literally diminishing my rationalization because the topic is porn, therefore thoughtless captions are equal to captions made with conscious purpose, so i should not bother trying to work out how to do the topic justice. then you even said "oh my fucking god", which is literally just exasperation and nothing else. you cannot bad faith your way into claiming you did otherwise to me

literally, across the entire thread, the only positive feedback i have ever gotten was someone who didn't even affirm they were my audience telling me i can afford to take it easy if i'd like (which was nice of them >>11386086, an anon saying they appreciate my smegma captions >>11388309, a bump when i was struggling with finding media to caption (which i just interpret as them supporting me) >>11398336, and the anon i did the muscle deliveries for saying expressing appreciation >>11399224 >>11402745

i cannot overstate that I DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOUR COMPLAINING ABOUT MY TEXT POSTS. i know you can easily reply "melty" or some bullshit to this, but literally how much of an asshole do you have to be to provide NO POSITIVE FEEDBACK about ANY OF MY CAPTIONS SINGLE-HANDEDLY CARRYING THE THREAD, FOR MONTHS, then ONLY show up to complain about my TEXT POSTS made ONLY TO BUMP THE THREAD AS I FIND MY INSPIRATION. do you want me to apologize for EXPLAINING HOW I'M TRYING TO MAKE MY CONTENT BETTER??? the thread boilerplate literally says >>11376232
>WIPs (works in progress) are welcome. Share ideas, resources, feedback, drafts, or finished pages.
go back to not even acknowledging my captions. no one asked you to read my text posts, and you will never under any circumstance even gesture towards a single word i've written in any caption. so you can eat my ass

>>11423132
It's ok. She is pretty divisive. From what I have seen, people straight up hate her or love her.

my raperant ahahaha

thanks for the bump. i'm sorry that happened to you. next time you can avert your eyes from the thread you have zero (0) interest in anyway, rather than opening the box of toys, shoving them all all aside to read the instruction manual at the bottom, then complaining that you were forced to read it

File: fooemkv363q19y9u.png (2.73 MB, 1456x2128)

2.73 MB PNG

self-harm/trans warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11420767
>http://archive.today/2025.11.18-044044/https://litter.catbox.moe/fooemkv363q19y9u.png

edit #106

very tedious time doing the text colors in this one. mostly due to my being OCD about it. learned (and relearned) a lot, since the last time i did trans pride flag colors was edit #20:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11339992/#11359124

i had to make my own chaser pride flag (since the straight pride flag colors of the actual flag were unusable for legible text), by hijacking the trans pride flag .svg from wikipedia:
chaser pride flag: https://files.catbox.moe/fefp6v.png
upscaled (without interpolation) and extended chaser pride flag: https://files.catbox.moe/21jq0e.png
100 "gaussian blur" upscaled+extended chaser pride flag: https://files.catbox.moe/nb0lu5.png

i learned that the "scale" tool (in my case, but probably all tools) fails to snap the centre of layers directly to the intersection of guides sometimes, instead being half a pixel off, yet because the "rotate" tool lets you plug exact coordinates for the axis of the rotation, i fell for that at first, then retroactively had do it all again, to rotate the actual centre of the layer

not much else to say, i guess, since everything else was just me being OCD inflating the editing time by a lot

>>11420020
not available anymore, bro, can you post again?

File: 00019-3115512930.png (2.76 MB, 1664x2432)

2.76 MB PNG

edit #107. original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
https://mega.nz/folder/CCgHgSJL#h5FRO0k-UqJT7w93R-qsUg/file/OXxGWCzI
>Blurry Eyes - Mega > 00019-3115512930.jpg

sorry!!! i had an off day yesterday, so even though this and my next caption (the next one is literally only 34 words) are extremely short by my standards (due to the typesetting opportunity afforded in them), i basically only chipped away at them for the past day or so, so i've only finished this one, despite it being some half the length than usual. i wasn't even going to post this one by itself, but i noticed i got a stealth (post-delete) bumper!!! i appreciate you, anon!!! i would've just responded thanking you with a text post, but after noticing you deleted it, i didn't want to make your consideration for not being a -1 to bump limit go to waste, so i just started on formatting the entry for this in my rentry and stuff to get this out the door, since it was already completed, haha

also, i forgot to say in my last edit, but between my last two edits, i did notice that remaking the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layer as i did in the recording demonstrating such in the OP >>11376232 was wasted effort; i could've literally just duplicated the normal stroke (outline) layer in a literal single click, then applied the "gaussian blur" to it directly, without bothering to rename it, either, since it'd be plainly visible it's the "gaussian blur" stroke (outline) layer, by the "fx" icon next to it in the layers list. while i already felt the video was lacking, once i realized in edit #69 (nice) >>11380612 that i could reduce the opacity of the "gaussian blur" stroke layers, and that i could demonstrate a colored "stroke" (outline), the tutorial literally instructing to do wasted steps is a huge blunder, so i will remake it eventually
>>11425934
it works for me, but i post mirrors to all gens in my rentry:
https://rentry.co/ambihurts

for that one, here:
https://files.catbox.moe/9ol4eh.png

>>11425968
ran out of space, but i also forgot to mention in my last edit that for some reason in gimp, when making the "gaussian blur" versions of the chaser pride flag, it added a transparency gradient to the sides of the flag. idk why it didn't happen for the top and bottom, (at least to the naked eye? i never actually zoomed in to check...), but to avoid that being in the image i extended the flag to 11k width (rather than the 10k i actually wanted), applied the "gaussian blur", then reduced the canvas size to 10k, making sure to centre the flag before exporting

also, i only realized since my last edit that on top of standardizing pride flag rotations in text to 45 degrees, i could also standardize the scale of the flag for any given text, measuring from the top and bottom of the short part of lowercase letters (or letters that are only comprised of the short part, such as "o" and "e"), and just make sure the flag is big enough to cover any higher or lower letters on the edges of any such text i'm changing. that would have streamlined the process of that edit soooo much, since that was one such thing i was being OCD about, since gimp transformations are destructive, so i can't just scale the pride flag up again if i am not satisfied with how it looks. also not having to think about this at all would just expedite the process inherently

my next edits are going to be a batch of consent denial gens i requested in >>>/d/ddg , but besides the 34-words-length one i mentioned in my last post, i've been struggling to come up with a way to caption them, because the girl doesn't have as much agency in them as i expected; it's such that the guy touching her seems enabled by the context, and the girl doesn't want to make a scene. plus, denying consent on being touched is different from denying a proposition for sex. but it is more nuanced than me being able to just call the guy the n word 50 times (which i'd be more than happy with doing), so i'm hoping for a breakthrough

>>11425968
would you caption one for me?

>>11425975
sure, but it depends on the subject matter, and i currently only do gens, because i consider genners infinitely more approachable than real artists (no offence to genners), so i feel the power dynamic is less stressful for me, even though i am still at their mercy, given i'm violating their content with gratuitous fetishes, likely without their consent. i can find a gen for you if you throw your request out there, though. but i only like traditional gender roles (masc top, fem bottom), so anything like a dickgirl top i wouldn't do, for example

>>11425978
Oh, thanks for the explanation, I was actually asking about like text captions.
I do gens (not the best but I'm figuring it out!) but the text work/dialogue I kinda draw a blank at and I really like your captions.
I also only like trad gender roles as well but my caveat with 50% of gen stuff I do is smell/smegma based.

>>11425980
i looooooooove smegma so fucking much, lmaoooo. i'd probably LOVE to caption your work!!! but your being new to genning might mean the style is generic, or the smegma looks bad (it is sooo easy for smegma to look bad in ai), but something being ostensibly ai can be ok, haha. i'm not against working with you at all!!!

File: 1754465592788973.png (1.52 MB, 1200x1200)

1.52 MB PNG

>>11425982
I figured you might from how good >>11420020
is.
Saaaame tho but yeah the style isn't the best (inconsistent/generic) and sometimes the smegma looks ridiculous or I have to generate it like a dozen times for it to look right. P
I used to edit pre-existing art to have smegma just for my personal use before figuring out sd. Have any tips?
Pic related is just an example, not what I had in mind for captioning.

>>11425988
bro, this is good!!!! i can hardly consider it generic, haha. it reminds me of the style of a >>>/vt/vtai regular. here's one of their posts, for example:
https://warosu.org/vt/thread/92212283#p92228466
>https://files.catbox.moe/lzweq1.png
but i am a non-genner, so i have no tips for anything, and i've only tried to draw my own smegma confidently a single time here >>11410045, haha. i did see this post once of someone's artist mix, and they do smegma sometimes:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/76143928/#76148568
>reaganlong, sohn_woohyoung, riz, eigaka, captainjerkpants, from stronger to weaker
i've seen some really good smegma on like twitter, but none had metadata, so they don't help, but here's a stack of smegma gens (with no metadata) i formatted once, basically all by the same genner:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11288567/#11293356

but your smegma is good already, and metadata for this is probably hard to come by, so there's kind of not much to go off of to explore different options, it seems

File: 1737585341861948.png (1.62 MB, 1200x1200)

1.62 MB PNG

>>11425996
Well dang, fren, I appreciate that. I wasn't thinking much of it but I've genned a few folders of "sets" and I had thought about putting them up on pixiv or something but I did want to caption them or have someone caption them because I find dirty talk and narration particularly hot (especially with smegma lol). Which you do particularly well, btw.
I have a lora for smegma that works really well but I have to tweak it just a bit every time or it will be absurd. Pic related isn't the worst but it's an example of how weird it can be and it'll mess with the rest of the picture.
Thanks for the links, bro, I appreciate it.

>>11426005
ah, i see what you mean, about this one. i mentioned that in the last of the links in my last post, where ai tends to make it look like a bunch of circles, which isn't the most immersive thing. i wish the genner who did the stack in that same post provided metadata, cause they managed to make it look like smearing, which i think helps a lot. but, again, i've seen good smegma on twitter (though without metadata), so they've probably managed it otherwise. they kinda have a similar style to each other, though (one i was gonna link [@VoltaicMeteor] is currently temporarily unavailable, so can't link:
https://x.com/mochipawg/status/1931696303383183630
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gs7DjJvXgAAthRj?format=jpg&name=orig
https://x.com/morrianon/status/1949924995628749311
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gw-GZr-XsAAs-ka?format=jpg&name=orig
https://x.com/rakugens/status/1992098968898342971
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6VKyBbWQAAoUt1?format=jpg&name=orig
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=15016548

the last one is actually from a deleted twitter, and actually has metadata, for what it's worth. also, i forgot to link this in my last post:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/73667944/#73669822

but the smegma is inconsistent in this one, since i'd say the first 2/3 are pretty good (especially the second), but the third is kinda not. and thanks for the constant praise, haha. i don't get much praise for my captions, so i appreciate it, you know!!! i never expected possibly the most gratuitous subject matter i do to be what gets me praise, haha. and i can maybe try captioning a set, but i might have to become familiar with the format of such, and not try to keep the dialogue so dense, since as i do them right now, i basically try to have an entire narrative structure in a single caption, lmao. but the images telling a story across multiple... well, images, would probably negate the need for that

File: 1736419168454076.png (1.51 MB, 1200x1200)

1.51 MB PNG

>>11426026
I've gotten it more consistent but whenever I switch characters or prompts or other loras I have to change the wording to fix it sometimes but once it does it fits. Like the pic I posted that was messed up was the third picture I ever genned I think so it's just an example, it still does that sometimes tho.
For real tho, your captions are great and it's cool seeing others who do smegma specific work (or at least have a thing for it like me lol)
If I had like one or two pics I wanted you to caption could I send them on catbox?
Pic kinda related

>>11426029
>If I had like one or two pics I wanted you to caption could I send them on catbox?
>Pic kinda related
sure, anything!!! and, wow, having to go back to the third pic you ever genned for an example of smegma you don't like is pretty impressive, haha. the smegma in your picrel is good!!! really!!! and i used to just shoehorn a smegma caption into any unrelated gen, but i definitely have a passion for it, haha. so it'll be nice to be able to do smegma because it fits the gen, and not just because i'm trying to shoehorn it in, you know!!!

but i should warn you that i have been VERY LAZY with captioning as of late!!! sorry. so i might take like two (2) days to get them done. sorry!!!

>>11426033
So am I, anon so I totally get it.
You prefer catbox or you want to send over session?

>>11426170
i am pretty sure session specifically is banned on 4chan:
https://archiveofsins.com/soc/search/subject/session/
https://archiveofsins.com/soc/search/text/session/type/op/

so even if i wanted to exchange sessions on 4chan (i don't), i wouldn't. idk how you can even go from session (privacy to the point of arising suspicion) to catbox anyway. also late replies for now because i'm busy, sorry. but if you don't want to share the gens publicly you don't have to use catbox

File: 1744771901992533.png (1.5 MB, 1200x1200)

1.5 MB PNG

>>11426170
>>11426173
Yo, not me, I'm
>>11426005
>>11425988
>>11426029
Don't even have session.
Anyway, here's the pics I was talking about, do not feel obligated to do all these, I'm just sending the ones I did for this character at the moment and I'm taking the opportunity since I saw your posts. Plus, ya know, fellow smegma kink and possible constructive criticism would be nice!
https://files.catbox.moe/t2rd8y.png
https://files.catbox.moe/tctf33.png
https://files.catbox.moe/gtllmj.png
https://files.catbox.moe/gdtipb.png
https://files.catbox.moe/iqmnbh.png

>>11426177
i still dunno what type of constructive criticism you expect from me as a non-genner, haha. but i guess the second catbox has its smegma floating off the dick to the right there, and i guess his urethra has some kind of blurring on, and her index finger on her right hand is maybe a bit suspicious. and the top of the glasses' lens in your picrel melt into being a double eyelid. but your style probably doesn't play well with finer details, anyway, such as the penetration in the 2nd-last one having her insides look kind of like ground beef, so besides the floating smegma, i think these things are to be expected, and can be overlooked (besides the glasses in your picrel; that would need to be edited out, since it's so visible)

there're several things i have to ask, but the main thing is, what kind of caption are you looking for? i'm glad you like dark-skinned guys, because i don't even like pale-skinned tops, cause i prefer the implicit taboo of the guy being below one's status. but that doesn't mean, of course, that you'd want me to just write a wall of slurs on the caption, especially since you said you'd post this to pixiv, and idk if pixiv allows slurs (not that any site would, but still). and i'm ngl, the expression in these gens not being sensual doesn't afford itself any room for verbosity (not that i'm necessarily trying to be verbose across multiple images, but still), and they have a pure innocence to them that to me can't reasonably be spun as her having any sexual inclination at all, per alone a penchant or smegma, so i feel the only natural caption is one where she's just excited to have a boyfriend, or do a favor for the homeless, not acknowledging the smegma in any way (or only doing so scarcely), which has connotations of exploiting her naivete, which is definitely a dishonest angle that even i've never done before, so it'll be a bit tragic. but if you had anything specific in mind, it'd be a better collab if you shared such with me

>>11426177
>>11426334
sorry for the late replies... sorry. i know it's super important to build a solid foundation so that we can even progress confidently following, so my absence just sucks. sorry. also, i ran out of space, but i meant to ask: why do you like girls wearing panties? i know that kind of puts you on the spot, but personally i have never understood the appeal of panties, and i'm not trying to guilt or pressure you into compromising on your tastes, for me; i was just hoping for some insight into it, so that i could maybe write some dialogue about it, if the opportunity presented itself. i guess it affirms that she really doesn't have sexuality on her mind in any way (if that was the angle you were going for), but i guess it's just another part of me not knowing what you're looking for, so it wouldn't be much of a collab if i just sent it and wrote something without extrapolating from your vision at all

>>11426334
>some kind of blurring on
some kind of blurring [going]* on
>per alone a penchant or smegma
[let]* alone a penchant [for]* smegma
i never proofread my posts, but that second quote was just a disaster, wtf

File: 1753781567741978.png (1.49 MB, 1200x1200)

1.49 MB PNG

>>11426334
Apologies for my own late reply, I went to sleep a bit after I posted.
But thank you for the notes, honestly sometimes I don't actually notice things like the glasses until way later so it's good having someone be like "yo, that looks a lil wonky." That's my own "oh shit I didn't proofread" moment lol.
>i'm glad you like dark-skinned guys, because i don't even like pale-skinned tops
Understandable, I don't dislike it but in hentai there's an immediate arousal with the status/class thing.
> or do a favor for the homeless,
We have another shared kink then, anon because that's actually what I was going for. Naive and excited to help the homeless, even having an excited fondness for the guy's dirtiness and the opportunity to help him. I hadn't put a ton of thought into the pictures themselves aside from getting the artstyle looking halfway decent/consistent and catering to my fetishes.
>>11426335
>why do you like girls wearing panties?
Cuz it's hot! I always like girls in panties, there's something deeply arousing to just an upskirt for me but for this in particular, the thought was that she was so excited/inexperienced that she was simply ready to get on all fours without really even knowing what to do or to take her panties off.
So the guy pulls them to the side and starts to clean his smegma off in her pussy. I hadn't genned anymore for that character so there's nothing past that point just yet. That was honestly when I found your posts, I was browsing here to get inspired on what to do next lol
Thanks for your responses, tho anon, you're very kind and I appreciate you taking the time to read and respond.
Here's other pics in the set where colors were slightly inconsistent but what are your thoughts?
https://files.catbox.moe/2c4vxw.png
https://files.catbox.moe/66h1w3.png
https://files.catbox.moe/i87yi6.png
https://files.catbox.moe/aqb2hk.png
https://files.catbox.moe/mj93as.png
https://files.catbox.moe/92iiix.png
https://files.catbox.moe/lue98p.png

>>11426424
pic related was another not great one btw, was posting that to show an example
literally the first picture I genned ever lmao.

>>11426424
well i don't have much to say about this batch besides that in the 1st catbox her right leg is missing below the knee, but this stack has at least one (1) alt for each one, so the alt for this (the 2nd catbox) has no such issue, haha. and the 3rd-last catbox has what looks like six (6) knuckles (suggesting as many fingers), but of course that one has two (2) alts, and the smegma in the alts is far more gratuitous, anyway, haha

but, i see, about your feedback otherwise. thanks for indulging me, especially on my weird question about panties, sorry. but about the pics themselves, i'm not really seeing how they can be others in the same set, sorry. unless "set" is terminology you use for genning, to refer to exploring and modifying a prompt- without necessarily trying to tell a cohesive story-, to me this feels like just a different version of the first batch, there's an imminent fellatio one, then imminent penetration, then penetration. here it's imminent fellatio or penis awe, then imminent penetration. i don't really feel these two batches can be reconciled to be a continuation of each other, if you mean them to be, then i can get started on a draft for both of them

if i were to do it without input, i'd go for 1, 3/5, 4 in the first batch >>11426177. desu in hindsight i think his right leg in 5 might not convincingly be connected to his hips (since we can see his groin, so it can't be imagined as farther back), but it's hard to notice, so to use the doubtful yet confident expression over the excited one, it could be worth choosing if it facilitated your vision most

for the second batch i feel the only meaningful choice is between the 3 and 4 (imminent fellatio or penis awe), and that too just depends on the angle you'd prefer. but with the helping the homeless angle, it would afford opportunity to acknowledge the smegma far more naturally than i thought, so my worry for implications of her being exploited were unwarranted

>>11426424
>>11426653
but i am not sure yet if i can just get started on these captions as is yet, because i have to ask: is this the whole scenario? because i can try writing it without a conclusive end if you'd like (though i've never tried such before, so i'll be figuring it out as i do it), but there's no strong climax to either (especially the second batch, since i assume you intended for both imminent penetration poses to be used, but even the first only has penetration where her expression suggests a reaction to such, rather than to sex, let alone orgasm), but if you meant the scenario to be left on that note, then i can put something together for both batches, if you'd like. but again, if you meant these batches to be a cohesive story between them both, you'd have to tell me how they can be, sorry. also i maybe see what you mean about the colors, since her bow is red in the first batch, but pink in the second (besides the last catbox)

File: 1757280952204123.png (1.43 MB, 1248x1248)

1.43 MB PNG

>>11426653
Ah, sorry, when I say "set" I kinda just mean
>this character in this scenario
Not in any particular order, my intention was actually for you to choose one or two that you liked individually and could think of some decent captions for, not for you to make a comic out of it necessarily. Sorry for the confusion! Like I said, more like a "which of these pics do you think you could make a decent caption out of?" And desu, most of those I didn't even notice! I don't even know why, it's like a goof in a movie I don't immediately notice unless it's blatantly like warped/deformed.
>but with the helping the homeless angle,
Yes, big kink of mine for hentai so I had that in mind initially. I started doing some more gens after my last reply and got preoccupied with holiday stuff for a minute but I think I managed (in a completely different 'set' with a different character, mind you) to make a better, more visually obvious homeless angle. I still probably prefer the ones I sent initially. Pic partially related, random pic from my folders.
https://files.catbox.moe/tnxfw2.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ehct4k.png
Just examples, no other pics yet, was just seeing how a new lora worked.
>>11426654
Like I said, I more was thinking like a narration for one or two of the pictures individually or two connected if they fit, not for all of them to be cohesive in anyway really. I'd love to know what you'd come up with.

>>11426759
sorry; i didn't mean to leave you in the dark on where i'm at on this currently, but you provided me enough context here to where i could produce a first draft, but i've been struggling with how to open with it, so i haven't written a single word for a caption of it yet, in over half a day. sorry

currently i'm eyeing the 1st and 3rd catbox in the 1st batch >>11426177. i considered the last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424 instead, but her expression is far more conventionally flattering to the guy there, so i didn't feel super inspired by it. that's the same reason i chose the 1st catbox in the 1st batch, since i could've gone with two where her bow was pink instead of red, but the options for her expression in the imminent fellatio ones with the pink bow (the 3rd and 4th catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424) seemed a bit hard to work with; her expression in the first is just hard to read (it's like shock, which is hard to reconcile with her bringing a homeless man into bed with her, since it's directed to him and not his dick specifically), and the second expression is penis awe, but one without sensuality, so any caption for it would've been both very conventional (cause it's flattering to the guy's dick), while also not affording itself any opportunity to appreciate the smegma, since i don't know how one can appreciate smegma in a platonic way

the 1st catbox in the first batch >>11426177 seems the easiest to work with of the imminent fellatio ones, but it's hard to reconcile it with the smegma, since her expression lacking any sensuality just as the others makes me interpret it as her platonic excitement is derived from the greater concept of serving the homeless, rather than the intrinsic act of cleaning his unwashed dick with her body. so i'm inclined to only see the smegma as a means to that end, sparing it little dialogue for its own merits, and definitely not any passionate dialogue. the imminent penetration one would be more explicit, though

>>11426759
also i didn't think of anything else to say since i was constrained by the character limit anyway, but rereading your post, i share your preference for the setting of the first two batches; i find it both more plausible and more degrading for the girl to provide a homeless man the luxury of comfortable living, than it is for her to give up her body to him in an alley. in the latter scenario, the degradation shifts away from being caused by the guy, to being caused by the uncomfortable living situation as well, which just kills suspension of disbelief, and is distracting to the taboo of the guy, anyway

File: 1735203591064917.png (2.62 MB, 1480x1480)

2.62 MB PNG

>>11427223
No worries, thanks for all your communication back and forth.
If it helps, would redoing the gens with some more obvious/clear facial expressions from her be more easy to work with? I like your idea of her intentions and what would lead to different takes on dialogue.
My initial intention was actually like you said since I find that scenario hotter as well; taking the homeless guy into her own room to help clean his dick. It could go either way with her being shocked at the amount of smegma he has, having second thoughts about it, or being passionately turned on and excited at the thought.
I did gen another "set" with a different character and scenario more like >>11426759
but the new lora I'm working with is a bit more detailed, kinda? I'm not sure if I like it quite as much, pic related.
Like I said, I do quite prefer the setting of the girl's room as opposed to the hobo's tent/shack/alleyway, so if it helps at all to redo some gens with better/different facial expressions, I'd be more than happy to!

>>11427331
i mean, the thing is, i know some people just like more happy expressions for their gens. for example, when i was new to captioning, i would give >>>/d/ddg genners a hard time, because i would complain about their gens having an "uncaptionable" smile:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11371247/#11375261
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11375742/#11377669
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11375742/#11380299

and it's not just /ddg/ genners; for example, i really enjoy this twitter genner's art style (@oatmealdood), and so does everyone, since he's currently at 121.5k followers. but every expression is the same nothing-going-on-upstairs smile. this is not to say anything about the subject matter of his gens not being very inspiring regardless. but i guess that's what it means to appeal to the lowest common denominator, anyway. plus he's a patreon genner, so he's incentivized to just do the least to make the money print itself

but besides that random rant (sorry), even if i didn't like smiles in gens, this is meant to be a collab, so it'd only be honest if the gen reflected your tastes entirely- since you're providing it-, and the captions were me extrapolating from your ideas, since i would struggle to see it as a collab otherwise. so i would hate to have you compromise on your first choice for anything in the gen itself. but it's not like i "don't like smiles in gens" (my phrasing, not yours) anyway; it's just that from a practical perspective, they do demand what they convey being met. but in the archived posts of mine i linked, anyway, i was complaining specifically about HUGE smiles, such that they provide ZERO nuance, so since there CANNOT be anything subversive coming out of their mouths, i consider them "uncaptionable". the expressions in the gens of yours i was eyeing are NOT such; it's only that with them (especially the first) being platonic expressions, i struggle to spin them as appreciating smegma. so i can do them, but they'd be lowkey on such

>>11427331
constrained by the character limit again, so i didn't think to say anything more- since it couldn't possibly fit-, but i reread my post, and wanted to elaborate on this >>11427436
>it's only that with them (especially the first) being platonic expressions, i struggle to spin them as appreciating smegma. so i can do them, but they'd be lowkey on such
the thing is, in the red bow imminent penetration gen i was eyeing (the 3rd catbox in the 1st batch >>11426177), i would say i purposely chose it over the last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424 specifically /because/ her expression was more inline with the platonic expression of the imminent fellatio gen i was eyeing (the 1st catbox in the 1st batch >>11426177). but the reason i said in the quote i'm elaborating on, and even earlier that it provides more opportunity to acknowledge the smegma >>11427223
>the imminent penetration one would be more explicit, though
is because she's looking at the dick, and the imminent penetration implies that she's offering her insides to clean it, so it naturally affords itself opportunity to acknowledge the smegma. while the pink bow penis awe gen (the 4th catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424) /also/ includes her looking at the dick (hence my calling it "penis awe"), it was just such a platonic expression that as i said earlier >>11427223, i didn't see it as providing opportunity to /appreciate/ the smegma, hence why i figured the red bow imminent fellatio gen would've done the platonic expression more justice, but, of course, that just made it even harder to reconcile with the smegma, since she wasn't even looking at it, and given her expression provided no opportunity to appreciate it, anyway, again, i merely saw it as a means to the end of helping the homeless, so any smegma dialogue would've been subdued

but spelling it out, i think i'll try using the pink bow penis awe gen, and probably the 2nd-last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424 (despite the expression disparity)

>>11427436
>>11427443
I'll definitely keep all this in mind when genning in the future, I definitely see what you're saying about the expressions and keeping that more consistent between shots or at least with the intention in mind.
I'm stoked to see what you'll do for those two pics tho, I think you're right that those are probably the overall best from the ones I've posted, so thanks so much, bro, you seem pretty well aware of the kink and intention I was going for.
Let me know if it's more inspiring to follow that direction for facial expressions and what you think would work best, I'm just learning this stuff after all!

>>11427331
>>11427443
ran out of space (again). i am SO sorry to make you have to put up with so much of my text post yapping, while having not a single word of a caption to show you as even a first draft yet... sorry. but, i just wanted to elaborate on the "expression disparity" i only briefly mentioned in the last characters of my last post >>11427443
>i think i'll try using the pink bow penis awe gen, and probably the 2nd-last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424 (despite the expression disparity)
i said it before, but it's basically still as i said here >>11427223
>i considered the last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424 instead, but her expression is far more conventionally flattering to the guy there, so i didn't feel super inspired by it
but it's compounded by her happiness in either of the pink bow imminent fellatio gens suggesting she has all the agency in the scenario, so going from that to a kinda impressed/concerned expression in the imminent penetration just seemed to me to not capitalize on how platonic the first expression demanded the dialogue be. i haven't been saying anything about the doggystyle pink bow imminent penetration gen (2nd catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424), because i just felt her looking away from the guy there doesn't afford itself much opportunity to acknowledge his smegma

anyway, sorry; to reiterate (in case the greater point got lost in all my text post yapping... i'm sorry to put you through all this... sorry), i'll just switch to captioning a pink bow pairing instead, and im currently thinking of the 4th and 2nd-last catbox in the 2nd batch >>11426424, to use the penis awe gen as a more natural way to acknowledge the smegma in the first gen
>>11427451
man, i'm sorry to make you put up with not ONLY all my text post yapping, but to read it all and even format a lengthy reply in turn so quickly, when i've been consistently so slow to get back to you. sorry!!! i hope to get back with at least a fist draft next!!! sorry!!!

File: 1757521700324242.png (1.09 MB, 832x1216)

1.09 MB PNG

>>11427452
lmao bro you have NOTHING to apologize to me for, it's a totally anonymous/random request from a stranger on the internet to another stranger. I appreciate you putting any effort or thought into it at all, so thank you for actually giving a fuck to put some consideration into it. I agree with everything you're saying, honestly and it made me consider redoing at least that one gen so the reaction is more consistent but I'd rather take your direction so we're on the same page.
I personally like the two you initially picked, the first imminent fellatio one and the second to last in >>11426424
or even the last in
>>11426177
So like I said, I'm real curious to know what you come up with and I think those are at least consistent enough in artstyle/coloring to work together or even individually. I kinda just like the idea of people enjoying my gens/specific dumb kinks enough to want to caption them.

>>11427570
i'm sorry to disappoint, but idk if i can do it. sorry. i still haven't managed to write even a single word of the caption, nor have i ever come up with a way to do so

idk how to even add any new information in saying it, but it's still just that while the imminent penetration ones can be spun as practical appreciation for the smegma just by virtue of what's about to happen, the imminent fellatio ones do not have that privilege. and i think the cumbersome image referencing might've lost you on which gens i was considering, so when discarding the ones with errors (and the doggystyle pink bow ones since i didn't feel they facilitated smegma-specific dialogue, and the red bow mid-penetration one for the same reason), it's these:
>red bow
https://files.catbox.moe/t2rd8y.png - imminent fellatio - 1
https://files.catbox.moe/gtllmj.png - imminent penetration - 2
https://files.catbox.moe/lue98p.png - imminent penetration - 3
>pink bow
https://files.catbox.moe/i87yi6.png - imminent fellatio - 4
https://files.catbox.moe/aqb2hk.png - imminent fellatio/ penis awe - 5
https://files.catbox.moe/92iiix.png - imminent penetration - 6

i would've chosen any combo of an imminent fellatio+penetration one with a matching bow color. and while i might've had a preference for certain imminent penetration ones due to the expression being less removed from her expression in whichever imminent fellatio gen i would've gone with, my hangup is of course with the gen before it. i kinda said it here >>11427436
>it's only that with them (especially the first) being platonic expressions, i struggle to spin them as appreciating smegma. so i can do them, but they'd be lowkey on such
and not enough space to quote me saying i thought the pink bow penis awe one (5) would afford smegma dialogue better, but i think i was wrong; i think the expression in 5 is too platonic to be spun as liking the smegma, even in her looking at the smegma

no space left. can you maybe change the expression? sorry

>>11427570
>>11427998
ok, the character limit really fucked me there (clearly), so i had to truncate a lot n shit to get it under character limit. but the only real things i couldn't include were these (the first quote just being an extended version of a quote i just quoted) >>11427436
>it's only that with them (especially the first) being platonic expressions, i struggle to spin them as appreciating smegma. so i can do them, but they'd be lowkey on such
>>11427443
>i merely saw it as a means to the end of helping the homeless, so any smegma dialogue would've been subdued
i said it before, but none of the expressions are "uncaptionable"; it's just that i don't know how to spin expressions so platonic as caring for the intrinsic value of smegma. were i to write a caption for any of the imminent fellatio ones (1, 4, or 5), i feel they'd be more focused on her trying to serve the homeless, with the smegma only being a vehicle to such. but i know the smegma is the point, so i was trying to reconcile the expression with the smegma itself, but i just don't see how i can. sorry. so if you don't mind giving her a different expression (and maybe an imminent penetration gen with a similar expression [but it doesn't have to 1:1 match any new imminent fellatio expression]), i hope it'd afford more opportunity to reference the smegma. sorry again

>>11428000
>>11427998
So in short, different expression? No problem! The next gens may not be exactly like the ones before but I'll see how close I can get it to match. In the meantime, can you tell me exactly what expressions you think might work best? Are we thinking more of a cockdrunk expression, shocked expression, excited, curious? (in the ones I sent, I can totally understand the expression being too naive/innocent/unknowing to really have much room to work with. I personally had in my head something along the lines of her being borderline oblivious to the implications of what she's doing and simply reveled in the opportunity to help mr gross homeless guy. Possibly he implies she can better help clean him by presenting herself on all fours like that but she's unaware of what he's doing? Just trying to think of what I had in mind when genning those lol)
Anyway yeah if you can tell me what expressions would work better for you, I'll see what I can gen with it. Thanks, fren!

>>11428026
if you don't mind the caption for at least the first being devoid of smegma appreciation and only using it as a means to help the homeless, then i can caption them as is; i was just saying that i saw no way to spin her expressions as caring for smegma for its own merits, but i assumed you wanted to see her appreciate the smegma, which i felt was impossible

i can caption them as is, if you really don't mind her being spun as oblivious, which i felt was the only reasonable way to interpret the expression. but i am lazy, in the end, so give me a sec to even try. sorry

>>11428026
sorry but can you give me some with a different expression after all? i am sorry. these expressions are just really hard to place, so i still haven't even thought of a way to start any of them (besides the imminent penetration ones, which i haven't gotten to yet). the pink bow ones (numbered 4 and 5 here >>11427998) are the hardest expressions to place, so i was just eyeing the red bow one (numbered 1 in the same post), but i still struggle to place the expression in order to meet it with dialogue. it's clearly just a pure, platonic joy- which i've long-since established isn't uncaptionable, as long as i'm not trying to reconcile such with being passionate about sexuality, which a platonic expression cannot manage-, but i guess it does share some parallels to the "uncaptionable" huge grins i complained about in the archived posts of mine i linked >>11427436, in that while my complaint with huge grins is that they demand being so forward that any sexuality becomes uninteresting to me, the expression she has here is so platonic and so highkey that i feel it trumps sexuality entirely, so any remotely sexual thing she acknowledges ceases to be such, so the caption will inherently fail. i guess by that logic it's even more "uncaptionable" than even the most "uncaptionable" huge grin i've ever deemed such, but with the huge grins i literally can't do anything except go in a straight line of being as forward as possible, but with her expression i could theoretically just direct her childlike wonder to something completely platonic instead, therefore highlighting the failure to acknowledge sexuality at all- let alone the erect dick covered in smegma)- by contrast. but captions like these that're one step removed from the point of its subject matter are things only i like, since i've gotten outright verbally abused for them at worst, but at best have only received a clueless audience. so the caption would still in practice fail

>>11428026
also i forgot to add that the red bow imminent penetration one i was going to choose (numbered 2 here >>11427998 has an error, in her panties being pulled to the side, but there also being panties around her thighs. i didn't really want to use 3 in that same post instead, because her expression lacking agency just seems too much of a departure from her expression of pure amazement in the one before, plus, again, the concern just seemed super conventional and flattering to the guy, so i didn't think it would be super interesting, especially considering with the homeless angle, seeking to flatter the guy seems to be the opposite of the point

>>11428026
also i didn't realize that since i'm asking for a new expression that i should answer your question about such in the very post of yours i'm "responding" to, sorry >>>11428026
>So in short, different expression? No problem! The next gens may not be exactly like the ones before but I'll see how close I can get it to match.
if getting the gens matching the ones prior is a personal constraint you'd like then by all means go for it, but my only hangup was with the expression not affording sexual dialogue; the environment is only something in my periphery in comparison. not to discard it as negligible, but still. also there's no need to match the previous ones if they won't be used, but if you're only trying to redo the imminent fellatio one (my main hangup) then you can try only doing so, if you'd prefer
>In the meantime, can you tell me exactly what expressions you think might work best? Are we thinking more of a cockdrunk expression, shocked expression, excited, curious? (in the ones I sent, I can totally understand the expression being too naive/innocent/unknowing to really have much room to work with.
i am just a non-genner, so i don't really think about expressions in concrete terms, but i think the conclusion i came to about the line between "uncaptionable" expressions and otherwise is that the expressions that afford the most immersive dialogue are lowkey. i stated such here, later into the thread of the 3rd archived post of mine i linked here >>11427436
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11375742/#11380332

but basically- even if it sounds contradictory-, even the most highkey passion is in practice lowkey in comparison to- for example- the platonic wonder in your imminent fellatio gens. your platonic expressions completely disable any opportunity for not only subtlety, but sexuality. but even the most overt, trembling passion can have her literally lie about it, claiming it's otherwise. but exclamations of joy are confined to what it says on the tin

File: page2wip9.jpg (1.5 MB, 1800x2400)

1.5 MB JPG

>>11414723
>>11414752
I like paint.net for quick drawn edits/compiles, having barely any tools or really anything taking up screen space makes it easier to keep track of what you're doing, at least with how I'd use it. It is objectively terrible for text though, I would do all sorts of little tricks to get what I wanted but better programs do exist. I highly recommend clip studio for managing text especially if using bubbles.

>>11378487
>>11379344
Man I posted this 2 months ago already? Too many games coming out that time of year. Here's a couple more pages done since, the rest are still only in bits and pieces. Good on you guys for keeping the thread going since. Oh, and the garbled text in the goblin girls speech bubble is meant to be unreadable, copied that from goblin slayer.

File: page3wip3v3.jpg (1.07 MB, 1800x2400)

1.07 MB JPG

>>11428729
Page 3 of, uhh, probably 7.

>>11428567
>>11428263
>>11428257
>>11428033
Whatever you think, bro. I genned some other pics that ended up having a completely different artstyle so I'll keep at it until I find one that looks good for captions. Now that you say it, I'm becoming autistically particular about how the faces are looking lmao.

>>11428731
nice tummy (i know it's a caption thread, but still)
>>11429012
i didn't mean to make you super self-conscious, or anything, about expressions; sorry. if i've made you start doubting yourself, maybe you're inhibiting your own preferences, which isn't what i ever wanted. sorry. if it helps, when i was saying that the condition for a captionable expression is it being "lowkey", i might've been being unfairly oversimplifying it there, since for example, i've been sitting on these fangirling or falling-in-love expression gens for if ever i needed them:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11394728/#11396787
>https://files.catbox.moe/dznkz9.png
and while it's true i could spin them as denying their passion if i wanted, since it's so overt, doing contrary dialogue would demand the passion bleeding into such dialogue (e.g., her managing a stuttering "i-is that so" or something as a guy yaps, but she's actually just drooling over his body). what i actually meant by "lowkey" was not that the expression is necessarily in itself "lowkey", but rather that it affords lowkey dialogue. i ran out of space to properly quote the example in the archived post of mine i linked in my post prior, but to do so here:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11375742/#11380332
>>wow... you're so hot...
>>hi! i think you're hot!!!
you can clearly see the huge, platonic smile the second quote is said with, which completely disables any opportunity for not only subtlety, but passion. but that is not to say, either, that passionate dialogue demands a passionate expression; a completely stoic expression does not inhibit passionate dialogue, so it is well enough, just the same

and that's all it is, in the end: passionate- or even emotionless expressions alike- afford passionate dialogue, but if the expression makes clear it is a platonic joy- for example-, then you can only meet it with dialogue of the same nature, so any passion is disabled, which disables sexual inclination

File: page4wip10.jpg (1.37 MB, 1800x2400)

1.37 MB JPG

>>11428731
Didn't sleep and did one more. Always think I'm done then decide to add one more detail or touch something up so it takes forever, even changed up the older ones. Stupid goblin porn is not worth nearly this much effort lol I'm not doing any goblin requests after this.

>>11429239
Thanks, sorry if this ruined it.

>>11429603
don't apologize!!! it's certainly gratuitous, but this has long-since been established to be your M.O., lmaooo

>>11429603
>Happy trail
Not ruining at all, that's even better baybeee

out of respect for the genner i was tryna collab with, i wasn't trying to be working on- let alone dropping- edits as we did the collab, as if to pressure them to rush their side of it, or anything, when already i would take some half a day (if not far longer) to fail to produce even a single word of the caption, only to come back to blame the expression for such (sorry). but it's been about three (3) days since the genner said they were redoing the expression (at my request... sorry), and this thread is now the 13/15 threads deep into page 9, and i expect somewhere on p10 we'd get a sympathetic bump (maybe a post-delete to spare the bump limit, so to respect that i wouldn't be trying to acknowledge it with a text post, but still), so i'll just make this text post right now. i'll start working on other captions in the meantime, but with my lazy-leaning turnaround time, i take two (2) days to drop a caption, so i won't have anything ready until the day after tomorrow, still. sorry

also, i'm ngl; i actually sorta /was/ using the time to at least /think/ of captioning, even though i hadn't written a single word for any since i dropped my last caption >>11425968, on the 26th (a week ago to the day). it was the ones i mentioned here >>11425969
>my next edits are going to be a batch of consent denial gens i requested in >>>/d/ddg , but besides the 34-words-length one i mentioned in my last post, i've been struggling to come up with a way to caption them, because the girl doesn't have as much agency in them as i expected; it's such that the guy touching her seems enabled by the context, and the girl doesn't want to make a scene. plus, denying consent on being touched is different from denying a proposition for sex. but it is more nuanced than me being able to just call the guy the n word 50 times (which i'd be more than happy with doing), so i'm hoping for a breakthrough
splitting this post up into two (2) because i have a lot to yap about on these prospective captions

>>11431306
so, like i said, i've been thinking about how to write these captions a lot. it's been a week. this is definitely the deepest i've had to dig for captions so far. my problem is that (to not just call myself "racist" as a half-joke and call it a day), i enjoy hating the guy, as long as it's hating his being a caricature of masculinity. i say this mainly in reference to stuff like this exchange i had ITT a month ago >>11409026
>I don't want to sound like a hater but this is ass imo, i feel like it could've worked better if you set it up as anon having been caught masterbaiting because that sounds like a more justified and believable version of misandry, also humiliating.
>Just my two cents on the subject
>>11409027
>well, this is a very crass way to say it, but ok. but i will not praise a man for masturbating, and i find it embarrassing to think a man should be praised for masturbating
>masturbation is not a traditionally masculine act, so i will not praise a man for doing such
i don't care for hating a man (inherently in a tsundere way) for things like gooning, social anxiety, having a small dick, not getting lucky with women, etc., because i only care for traditional gender roles, where the man is masc, and none of these facilitate such, so i don't want the man to hold these traits

that was just an aside, even though it was long. sorry. to actually get back to- and elaborate on- my struggle with the prospective captions i'm hung up on, my problem is that i struggle to reconcile the men being caricatures of masculinity with the girl not wanting to make a scene in response to his advances, since it means the guy's actions are enabled by the context, granting him status the girl needs respect (at least partially). i didn't realize this when i got the deliveries, but i guess i hate when men have status. since i like praising women (but it's not taboo, so i've since fallen off of it), the girl having status is fine, but for a guy i think it's queer

>>11431306
>>11431307
another three-part text post. i struggled to get the last one under character limit, but i suppose it conveys my struggle in its entirety, anyway. but i did come up with an example of how something slightly different would be more inline with my preference for traditional gender roles

i imagined a girl being looked after by a man, somehow. she was down on her luck- for whatever reason-, and putting up with a man is the most habitable way for her to survive. the man makes advances on her, and she can't protest in practice, but she can't hide her disgust. that reduces the scope of the man's status to being something he alone provides, so every word the girl speaks will be relative to him, so it will still be a caption intimately hating the guy. in contrast, the gens i'm trying to caption can only reasonably be spun (to me) as the girl not wanting to make a scene for outside reasons, from being in public, and the guy being afforded his actions due to his being highly-regarded in such. to me this is embarrassing for the guy, since it means his legacy isn't his own; he's enabled handicaps beyond himself, to exploit, to get the woman. even if it were say a king demanding a woman do a song and dance for him- which she can't reasonably decline, due to the consequences of such-, he's the king, so the power is his (even if he didn't earn it, which if a guy must have status is a particularly embarrassing example of such anyway, imo). i feel i am more working with the king's spoiled son, whose archetype inherently is one step removed from any status being his own, but he exploits it anyway

i am still hoping for the breakthrough i originally hoped for a week ago- cause i really don't want to flatter the guy due to his status-, but if i can't manage it i'll just crawl back to the genner and ask for ones where the only reasonable interpretation isn't the guy exploiting his status for the girl. but doing so a week later is some weak shit, so ill dig deeper

i didn't know you could break greentext mid-line with a cross-board link like that, haha. kinda crazy
>greentext >>>/trash/caption non-greentext

>>11431311
on the archives it doesn't look broken, though:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11376232/#11431311

>>11431309
>but i did come up with an example of how something slightly different would be more inline with my preference for traditional gender roles
>i imagined a girl being looked after by a man, somehow. she was down on her luck- for whatever reason-, and putting up with a man is the most habitable way for her to survive. the man makes advances on her, and she can't protest in practice, but she can't hide her disgust. that reduces the scope of the man's status to being something he alone provides, so every word the girl speaks will be relative to him, so it will still be a caption intimately hating the guy. in contrast, the gens i'm trying to caption can only reasonably be spun (to me) as the girl not wanting to make a scene for outside reasons, from being in public, and the guy being afforded his actions due to his being highly-regarded in such. to me this is embarrassing for the guy, since it means his legacy isn't his own; he's enabled handicaps beyond himself, to exploit, to get the woman
man, i'm an idiot, actually; sorry. i went to piss and thought about it, and the pieces were all there, but i couldn't put them together until kinda laying it all out before me like this: the guy is EXPLOITING his status to get the girl. that makes him a bad person. so i can hate him on that basis, for exploiting the vulnerable. captioning these will likely be a breeze, now. this is the breakthrough i was hoping for. next time i request something with traditional gender roles, tho, i needa clarify the guy can't have status, cause it's flattering to him that doesn't have to do with his masculinity (imo)

>>11431317
>cause it's flattering to him that doesn't have to do with his masculinity (imo)
>to him that
to him [in a way]* that

>>11431317
>the guy is EXPLOITING his status to get the girl. that makes him a bad person. so i can hate him on that basis, for exploiting the vulnerable. captioning these will likely be a breeze, now. this is the breakthrough i was hoping for
i mean, i kinda faintly realized it right after submitting the post, but i found i was wrong, actually; this just showed me where to look for my opportunity to spin the man's status as opportunity to hate him (in an inherently tsundere way), but hating him "for exploiting the vulnerable" isn't quite it; i need the man's status to specifically be demeaning to him. for example, of the three (3) denying consent gens i've been struggling with finding a way to caption for the past eight (8) days now, the easiest one to caption (which i've never been worried about managing) is one i'll spin as the guy being completely inappropriate for his status, such that the girl is just saying the quiet part out loud: that it's a cruel joke for the guy to have his status. this all but completely nullifies his status, which makes it approach my preference for him having no status at all the most. one of the two i feel she girl needs actually respect his status in practice, so i'm less inspired to write it. but one of them i feel the girl needs completely respect his status in practice, which i super don't like, but i have thus far been utterly failing to spin it as otherwise. idk if i can manage it. i might just give up on the whole set if i can't