Kofe time.Post watches in this watch thread.Anything between $1 and $50000. Everyone is welcome even chinese watches. I love watches, you do too. Let's discuss and appreciate them.This thread offers a forum to discuss and debate wristwatches, pocket watches, and clocks. Several members here are highly knowledgeable in specified areas of horology, so please contribute to the thread by asking questions and/or asking for advice if you are planning on purchasing a watch from an AD or the grey market. Please post pics of your watches here; it doesn't matter if it's worth 5$ or 50000$, because there might be someone who wishes to eventually purchase the same model that you own and would love to hear some real-world advice regarding ownership. The experience matters the most, not the price.Previous Decently Based Thread: >>18636541
Thinking of doing a long-term review about the white birch ownership. Had it since 2023 and I think it's time.Things that no one really talks about. Maybe just a video of me talking about it for like 10 mins or so.
Want.
>>18638028have you seen it irl? How's the bracelet?
>>18638031I haven’t. I’ve been to a couple of local jewelry stores with listed as Seiko luxe dealers and neither of them have had it. I may need to travel to Atlanta. In other news I got a SPB117 that’s been great.
>>18638020How will you do that? You can't even take new fucking photos?You're not going to do anything. You'll never post your face or your voice. You totally suck and your threads suck.
>>18638020What could you say that hasn't been said?
>>18638036Sure you did. All this Seiko fellation is VERY organic. In fact, I'm going to go get a new Alpinist tomorrow. It's that or the Samurai Black Prospex. Not sure. Just know I want to drop about $1k on a watch and it's going to be a Seiko. Obviously. Thanks, gang!
>>18638044?
>>18638046What's your question?
>>18638051You’re accusing me of lying about getting an alpinist. I posted my alpinist.
>>18638040I scrolled through the previous thread, what ware those claims of no new pictures? It's clearly wrong. I post new pics all the time.Also, I posted my voice at least 5 times over the years, maybe even more. Through that Catbox moe thingy.>>18638043Real life accuracy. How people react when they see it. How heavy it actually is. How it handled the beach. The lack of finishing in very specific parts. What the Zaratsu looks like after 3 years of daily usage. The double reflection from the dial to the top of the markers. And anything really that's not specs. It won't be a "A week on the wrist".It's going to be a real raw review, not a specsheet.
>>18638044>All this Seiko fellation is VERY organicHave you never been on ANY watch forum or anything like this?Seiko circlejerks are everywhere. Reddit, WUS, small forums, youtube, everywhere.Poorfags feel like they have a real watch and won't shut up about it.If anything, it's surprising that the Seiko shilling isn't more prevalent here but I guess contrarians speak even louder than poorfags.
>>18638064>he thinks anyone ever watches his video linksImagine being this attention hungry lmaoMaybe the real whore was the attention whore
>>18638064Why do you EVER repost old images? That one's 20 days old. If you CAN post O.C., always post O.C. There's really no excuse to keep posting the others.
>Another episode of anon posting his GS and other anon getting mad over thatHow can you go on like this? What do you get out of this?
>>18638092>What do you get out of this?replies like this
>>18638064>Real life accuracy. How people react when they see it. How heavy it actually is. How it handled the beach. The lack of finishing in very specific parts. What the Zaratsu looks like after 3 years of daily usage.Can you give us a tldr of these points? I’m mildly intrigued but not enough to watch an entire video.
>>18638103Proud to be a troll. That's fucking sad. That you have to not only settle for internet attention in lieu of the real thing, but that you're not interesting or clever enough to earn positive attention so you bait people into getting upset with you. I pity your sad life. You must have real OCD issues to keep doing the same things over and over.
This little community is very toxic.You can't get a cheap watch, you can't get an expensive watch, you can't get a mid tier watch. You are always wrong and cringe somehow.
>>18638122That's because ALL watches are shitters.
>>18638122You nailed it. That's how it feels. Because some people just don't want others to be happy. If someone is enjoying or excited for something the trolls have to try and ruin it.I have slightly less sympathy for the snooty luxury watch people because A: it's "punching down" what they do, and B: they usually only have one super high end watch that makes them act like a snob. It's completely immature and rude when they call people "poor". But there's also the condescension as if it's an ignorance thing and a class thing as well as an economic thing. Like even if you can't afford Swiss shit, you should still study it, appreciate it, acknowledge it, and aspire to own it, because anything else is just garbage. I'll briefly humor someone saying that shit if they actually walk the walk and have an entire collection of badass luxury watches and deep knowledge. But no one who fits that description would ever be such a cunt to people. Just a bunch of bitter, jealous posers.I think people should get whatever watches make them happy and not preach about how anyone is "doing it wrong". But that's not going to happen.
>>18638124>>18638130We are followers of our glorious pontiff saint Archie of Luxury and follow his word>ALL watches are SHITTERS except mine
>>18638134All of my watches are shitters. Every watch I will ever own will be a shitter. I have like 50 now.
>>18638122>This little community is very toxic.It happens in literally every general, no matter the board, no matter the topic. They all just turn into avatarfag circlejerks.
>>18638122>You are always wrong and cringe somehow.Yes, but so is everybody else, so it evens out and you get used to it.
>>18638028>no stupid 24-hour subdialYes, get it.
People don't hate him for his seiko, they hate him because he's deliberately and knowingly spent the last several years bothering the general by attention whoring and trolling and spamming. He thinks it's funny to tank the quality of the threads by making them about him.
>>18638156Nobody but you hates him, nobody but you complains constantly.
>>18638156>Oh my god, watches in the watch thread!111Just fuck off. Isn't nawt enough for you? You don't even like watches, what the fuck are you doing here?
>>18638156just go to /nawt/. You're overthinking it.
>>18638156Poor anon.. Forced to be on 4chan, forced to read and post in the watch thread. I wouldn't want to be him.
>>18638130>>18638139>>18638149/wt/ is somehow worse than other threads on other boards.It's not even an avatarfag issue in itself, I'm used to avatarfags existing pretty much everywhere.It's just the general toxicity towards pretty much all watches and all posters. You can't just have fun and be happy. You could say one can get used to it, but I am really tired. What's the point of getting used to something bad?If we are being honest, 90% of watches are pretty good. They tell time, they don't break down easily, they look cool to the people who like them... seems like all is well, everyone wins. But no, they all actually suck besides like 1 or 2 that a random guy personally approves of. It's really sad.
>>18638167>just go to /nawt/. That was the point of /nawt/: to just give up /wt/ to the frenposters and form a thread where watches can be discussed. Sounds good in theory. But what happened? Bittercel and the other avatarfags didn’t like people leaving them so they shit up /nawt/ even worse than this thread. They can’t fucking control themselves.They can’t start a discord because no one would join. We’ve already seen that.They won’t just trip up because then everyone would filter them.They’re not actually interested in watches anymore, they’re just interested in ruining a thread that didn’t tell them their latest purchase was based.
>>18638157It isn't just him. I've been bitching about it too. I've only been here a couple months and sorry I don't know everyone's name yet, but there's Grand Seiko guy, thin-wristed black Casio karaoke guy, and 'Kofe' guy, who I have personally watched go from the occasional post with a beverage to multiple times in every watch general recycling the same pictures. Or maybe they're all the same guy, maybe he's been doing it for years and I only witnessed a brief, uncharacteristically low-output. But it borders on spamming. Why the fuck are you okay with it? I'm not some paranoid schiz who thinks "you must be him", but I also can't wrap my head around a third party defending it and pretending no one else is bothered. It's gotta be more than just me and the anon you're replying to. I don't believe you enjoy looking at it.
>>18638177Oh, and how did I forget Weekdater guy?
How can you guys be general posters and still be upset at resident anons? It's like I'm in /vg/ circa 2012 and anons are getting mad about people posting their characters. Where do you think you are? This is more of a clique than a forum, and that's fine. If you want something more "public" with less repeat posters, you can go to r/watches or something.
>>18638183BECAUSE THEY'RE POSTING THE SAME EXACT PHOTOS NOT EVEN FROM CURRENT YEAR OVER AND OVERQuit acting like it's just part of the tradition of a tight-knit community. This is not that. You're giving way too much lore and power to these fucking trolls. At this point I'm sure you're one of them. You think this is how the board works. You think it's endearing; your "calling card". >Just letting the boys know I'm still around>"Checking in" with the classic gold drenched C3PO ashtray pic everyone loves so muchFUCK YOU.
>>18638194Daddy chill
>>18638183Like clockwork, one of two lines of defense>whay, you don't want people to post watches in the watch threadOr>anyone who has any problem with the state of the threads is one specific guyNo one likes the spamming of not just the same watches but the exact same photos or the thread being used like someone's personal blog. The coffee turbofaggot not being permabanned for spamming is beyond me.>but other generals also have recognizable facesMy guy do you really want to say "Cecil existed and everyone loved him right ?" as an argument
>>18638194Based. Thank you for explaining what I was thinking as well.
RECOMMENDATIONS PLEASE>budget 12K>BrandBregeut That's it.
>>18638207Rolex 1908 in yellow gold, secondary.
>>18638194>>18638197Look man, I'm not versed in the lore of your general because I get into watches off and on every couple years, but 4chan is my primary media consumption site and every single board that has a reoccurring thread or general for something is the same. People do these things and people like you complain about them, but the nature of these places doesn't change and won't change. The only thing that can change is your reaction to it and acceptance of it for what it is. It's not going to change, I don't think it should either. If you don't like it, there are other places that more align with your preferences. Why should it be the responsibility of people who do enjoy this place to stop doing what they like for the people who don't enjoy it? If you don't enjoy it, just go. Why stay?
>>18638211>Look man, I'm not versed in the lore of your generalYou’ve been here for years. You’re fooling no one. New posters don’t Write essays.
>>18638211No one, and I do mean NO ONE needs to change what they do and how they behave in order to accomodate avatards, trips and spammer.You are correct, what changes is our reaction and it's a shame that these fags who so clearly belong on reddit aren't shunned as hard as they used to.
>>18638216You are actually paranoid lmao. I'm the guy dipping his toes into more expensive pieces now, buying this green PRX most recently. Last time I was here was years ago when I wanted to get a SARB033, was too expensive, and got recommended a SUR311, and called it good for a couple years until recently. You need to take a break if you're this worked up and personally invested to this degree in a negative way.
>>18638211>If you don't enjoy it, just go. Why stay?We literally fucking tried. See >>18638174 for a pretty good rundown.
>>18638224You're trying to do something in a place that isn't meant or equipped for it. I mean this as inoffensively as I can express, if you don't like that kind of posting, go to another website or platform.
>>18638232Well, hell, then why are you whining about other people whining? You go ahead and post your ancient coffee pics and we’ll go ahead and correctly identify you as a faggot. Yay “board culture”!
>>18638220>I'm the guy dipping his toes into more expensive pieces now, buying this green PRX most recently.Little buddy, you’re not yet dipping your toes in. You’re still about an hour’s drive away from the water’s edge.Buy your first Rolex. That will be you “dipping your toes.”
>>18638236I'm not whining, I'm just telling you the reality of the situation. It's your choice to continue being upset about it.
>>18638266>I’m not mad you’re mad trololololololEnjoy your Casio
>>18638268I do, thanks.
Perfection. Down to the most minute detail.
>>18638286
>>18638285The only thing keeping this collection behind GS is the limited number of dials. Really nice design and architecture.
That faggot with his cum watch is so annoying, at least i don't spam my far superior watch.t. the real chronomaster chad.
>>18638309>>18638268>>18638240>>18638236>>18638224>>18638219>>18638216>>18638197>>18638194Why don't you post your watches? I don't think people care as much as you when it comes to seeing new photos of the same watches. If you like something, share it. I don't mind, I like watches and getting testimony from long-term ownership. It's the hardest kind of feedback to find so if something holds your attention like >>18638285 has for him, then feel free to share.
>>18638299The paper dial is the GOAT. Too bad coffeefag could afford one and had to settle for the cumdial.
>>18638311>Why don't you post your watches?No one has asked any question that would be answered by me posting any of my watches. No sense in posting pointless pictures without reason. It’s just going to make the poorfags bitter and jealous.
>>18638315It's not a QTDDTOT thread, it's a general. Go ahead.
>>18638316Nah. You post your way. I’ll post my way. If I can answer a question about one of my watches, I’ll post a picture. It’ll be a nice surprise for the thread. Something to break up the monotony of the years-old pics of the Cum-dial Citizen and Whoretadello’s shitters.
>>18638318>complains about low poster quality and lack of different watches posted in the thread >doesn't actually contribute to improve quality and assortment of different kinds of watches Alright, man.
>>18638320>being deliberately obtuseCool, man.
>>18638320Hey, this is what you asked for, pal. Everyone gets to post in here how they like. Now you’re begging for something different?Make up your mind.
>>18638322I'm the bad guy for asking you to post watches in the watch general?
Should i post my watch?
>>18638337Why are you telling other people how to post?
>>18638337You need to be more consistent.Spell it out. What are “””the rules””” for posting in your watch thread?
bought this tissot in 2015 thanks for listening
>>18638343Asking=/=tellingI'm just recommending a solution to your own self-inflicted misery and agitation. >>18638345Whatever the rules of the board are, but I'm telling you that you would be happier being less critical about what people post and instead being proactive in producing what you would like to see.
>>18638348>instead being proactive in producing what you would like to see.That’s exactly what I’m doing. I’m only going to post my watches when posting them is relevant to the discussion. That’s how I choose to use the thread. Then you come after me for not posting my watches? Which is it? Can I post how I want or do I have to post how you say?
>>18638345>Spell it out. What are “””the rules””” for posting in your watch thread?He wants it both ways. Endless avatarfags spamming and also actual watch discussion. He doesn’t realize the two can’t coexist.
>>18638354>>18638358Actual DARVO behavior here. You're the ones shitting up the threads now, for every every person posting their watch again, there's dozens of posts from each of you arguing about it. That's what kills discussions, not a photo you can just scroll past and not engage with if it's not your thing.
>>18638342Yes.
>>18638361>DARVOlol, what are you, a woman (not a real one, of course.)
>>18638342No, you'll have schizophrenics who get mad for you talking about or posting photos of watches in the watch thread, I guess.
>>18638365I have more hair on my back than you do on your entire body.
>>18638361I don’t see you posting your watch, though, but you’re squawking about a lack of watch pics? LMFAO. You’re literally being bitter about people not posting watches for you to be bitter over. Jesus Christ.
>>18638368That explains why no one believes you when you insist you’re a woman.
>>18638369I've posted two photos of my watches. >>18638220>>18638274I've never negged on someone's watches they post unless they're asking for critique and opinions, it's not worth my time and effort to provide unsolicited opinions on a watch they enjoy that I wouldn't wear. I'm definitely not the bitter one here lmao>>18638370Yep, get it out of your system, nowatches. I hope you guys learn to contribute someday. You've essentially killed all discussion in this thread by bitching about people who post watches, and as far as I can tell you haven't posted any of yours at all.
>>18638373>I've posted two photos of my watches.Which ones?
>>18638375I quoted the posts I made. Do you not know how 4chan works? More evidence for you being a tourist and shitting up a place you don't even like in the first place.
>>18638361>>18638365Right? He’s acting like he’s a rape victim because we aren’t feeding him watch pics. What a colossal faggot>>18638373>I’ve posted two photos of my watchesMake that a poor faggot.
>>18638274That's a gigachad watch right there.
>>18638379$600 in watches is still more than the $0 you've posted. Be the change you want to see.
You guys made /nawt/, why are you still here?
>>18638381If you ask about the right watch, I’ll show you a 20,000 dollar watch with a timestamp, even. Don’t you wish you could force me to post how you want? You’ve been howling for hours now. :)
>>18638386You sure don't act like somebody who owns a $20,000 watch. If your time is valuable enough to produce the value necessary to buy one of those, why have you been here the exact same amount of time I have, arguing? In addition, there's this >>18638384 you made your own space that aligns with your preferences. Why are you here?
>>18638390Don’t tell people how to use the thread. This is how I choose to discuss watches here.
>>18638391You don't behave according to that principle.
>>18638391I accept your concession.
>>18638393>>18638395>samefaggingSorry, ma’am, but (You) wanted us to accept the avatarfagging and just have everyone accept that people can post however they want. You don’t get to turn around and demand people then post exactly how you want. That’s feminine behavior.You can post your shitters a hundred times per thread if you want and I won’t stop you or complain, but I won’t let you tell me how to post until you spell out the rules.
Fine.My watch..
>>18638397You're the worst kind of poster and it's sad how there's always 1-2 of you regardless of the board. Just pure negativity, never posts anything substantive, dodges the question when people ask why they're even in a place that makes them mad. Wild.
>>18638398>cheap dogshit watch>pic is nearly two years oldNOW we’re talking. /wt/ gold.
>>18638398See, was that so hard? You should have done this instead of derailing the thread with meta posting.
>>18638399There is no need to cry like that.You could have talked about watches but you decided to turn the discussion towards thread rules. We’re simply engaging you on your terms.You want to talk about watches? I won’t stop you, I promise. Be the change you want to see in the world.
>>18638400>Posts no watchI accept you concession.
>>18638404>still not talking about watchesWe’re all waiting…
>>18638403You argue like a woman, you avoid the description of your behavior then you just throw it back at the person who accuses you of what you've done, regardless of whether it's actually observable reality. The smug way you repeat back to me the things I've told you without actually living up to them or changing your ways is so feminine.
Back to your thread, seething nowatches>>18631098>>18631098>>18631098
>>18638407What, you mean like what you’re doing now? <:^)(You still haven’t picked a watch to talk about, I notice. I thought that’s why you’re here.)
>>18638410>>18638408
>>18638408THIS! we’re actually talking about watches ITT!No one is allowed to post unless they have posted a watch pic in this thread. Those are the RULES!!!
>>18638408That thread gets no traffic. It's been under bump limit for 11 days.
I hope chinks will step up their movement game in the coming years.They make a lot of beautiful watches, but they always have entery-level movements. I would gladly pay $500 instead of $200 for a full-stack chink kino banger.
>>18638414>no watch picWhat are you doing retard?!
>>18638413kek
>>18638398I'm not too big on the older Aquaracer's but the latest ones look very nice.
HOLY FUCK I LOVE BEING WHITE
>>18638413Nawtards.. We got too cocky..
>>18638390>If your time is valuable enough to produce the value necessary to buy one of thoseWow this loser thinks everyone's a wage slave like him...Parents didn't love you?
>>18638459No, it’s just working class people ITT. Anyone with a nice watch is just a tourist here to flex.
Kofé time.
>>18638156>People don't hate him for his seikoExcept the omegoid that bought before he knew swiss made is a scam
>>18638163>>18638167The existance of nawt makes the point. His blogging bullshit got so fucking overbearing people made multiple other watch threads to try to stay away from it and the avatarfags still blogged and spammed those threads and made everything about them. There's posting watches and then there's whatever OCD posting they do.
>>18638478Obviously not that many people had issues with it, since it's been almost 2 weeks since they've hit bump limit lol
>>18638482people are coming here for watches less overall because of the shit dickery of these faggots. They killed all actual discussion.
>>18638485cope, sorry the big kids don't want to play in your fort.
>>18638444>HOLY FUCK I LOVE BEING WHITEDo you also love being without a date?
>>18638207
>>18638485https://www.watchforum.com/There u go
>>18638220Based calm and collected prx chad
>>18638285>>18638286>>18638287I'm not into quartz but I looked it up and this is actually a bit special. Didn't know it had a mechanical perpetual calendar.
>>18638468ID?
>>18638510Eee....
>>18638207t. archie luxury
It's fucking spelled COFFEE, you pretentious foreign faggot. Goddamn, I hate you fucking cringe ass foreign retards.
>>18638519Don't have it in you to actually reply to the person you're mad about?
>>18638528If you're perpetually online, especially on 4chan, one starts thinking that giving people (you)'s is a form of award. Anyway that's the sign that we know it's the same guy since reversocell (like... 7 years ago?) called him "Bitter"and he never recovered from that.
18638532cool story unc
I didn't read any of the faggot drama you guys seem to be having all day.If it's not a normal post, I just skip it.
>>18638554What is a normal post? Just the daily citizen and seiko spamming from 3 guys?
Thoughts?
>>18638220
Why do you keep posting this hand-wringing merchant?
>>18638211You are a perpetrator and everyone else hates it.Fuck off.
>>18638219No. You also hate how the same "kofe time" images are posted over and over. If you have witnessed this you would never defend it. It simply is not okay to keep posting repeats. And you wholeheartedly agree with me on that. I'm glad we got that straight and are all on the same page.
>>18638285>2023Yes, you're the problem. FUCK YOURSELF
>>18638345The rules are: Always post OC. That's it. If you want to post your Citizen or Grand Seiko or black Casio AGAIN, you need to take a NEW PHOTO.That's all we ask. Knock yourself out spamming the same fucking watches, just don't repost the same photo twice. Is that fair? Yes, it is.
>>18638398You don't have it anymore? That's too bad. Because you could take a new photo and post it, but you don't have the fucking watch anymore.
>>18638533Broken link. We don't know who you're replying to. You must be new.
>>18638575Score. You got the same diver style everyone seems to like but you got a superiorly made one and you didn't pay too much.San Martin is the way to go. If I dug that style my journey would be over. Green's my favorite too. And tremendous magnification there on the cyclops. Good for you, anon.
>>18638285>>18638286>>18638287It's nice. It's like the quartz version of>>18638020>>18638398I like Tag Heuer quartz watches (Formula 1 and Aquaracer).
>>18638287It's a sunburst dial? Had no idea. Very beautiful watch man.
Kofe time.
>>18638797It's spelled COFFEE, you fucking foreign retarded faggot. Pretentious fuck
>>18638801lol, this.
>>18638482Yeah and these threads hiit bump limit with 5 coffee faggotry, 10 copypastas and several GS reposts, no wonder they're faster.Leaving /g/ was a mistake.
>>18638829Watches used to be on /g/?
The G-Shocks could be on /g/
>>18638834You might be onto something. Seems like these watch threads are deliberately spammed here.
I've never even been to /g/. I assumed it meant 'games', lol.There are so many boards I've never even tried in all my years of coming to the site. I'm glad I found /fa/ or I wouldn't have become a watch junkie.I'm actually not very happy about that though too. I've spent over $500 on watches in the last three days. I can't stop.
>>18638829We didn't leave G, we were cast out.why, might you ask? The mods were tired of the flood of reports from et because people were bitching about the watches posted and "avatarfags"..
>>18638848LOL! Upvote!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In case anyone is wondering, the coffee guy is from Finland and is an avatarfag in Ukraine threads on both /k/ and /pol/.
>>18638870How embarrassing. I'm half Finn and have always wanted to visit the homeland my ancestors came from.
>>18638870Got a source for these claims?
>>18638870The Finland part I remembered, but I didn’t know about his other posting activities.I don’t know if anyone remembers when, before he learned about the risk of oversharing, he posted at fit check of himself and he had these fat man-tits, or when he admitted that his job was as a shelf stocker in a grocery store.
When I ordered my cocktail time I didn't even know these cool secret clasps existed. Just looked like a regular leather strap to me. On one hand it's super simple and fits perfectly and is very clever. But on the other hand it's kind of a ruse. It's like a clip-on necktie in that regard.I'm not complaining. It will last a lot longer as you're never really bending anything or dragging it through the clasp. Quite ingenious. I really feel I should have known every last detail of a watch that spendy before buying it though. Lousy research on my part.
>>18638917>Lousy research on my part.Don’t feel bad. You’re doing quite well. Most people with Down’s syndrome can’t even tell time on a watch with hands. I bet your mommy and daddy are super-proud of you.
>>18638849Who was the avatarfag on /g/?
>>18638917Hey, why is this being reposted? Who's the sick fuck who saved this and why? Creepy. I feel violated.
>>18638923It was a guy who bought a Tudor and had a bit of a meltie with regards to “Couldn’t afford a Rolex, eh?”
mods.... Can you, can you please just at least time him out? Every single post he's made, every single one, is either attacking, shitposting, spamming or trying to doxx someone. Extremely low quality overall. There was a time were he got banned for 3 days at a time and we had great threads. I implore you to at least consider it. It's not fun for anyone. He never even posts a watch, never asked anything about watches. Please.
How about I start playing too? I'll do it with my shitters and otherwise. Get used to this photo because you're going to be seeing it in every watch thread. Just kidding. I'll at least make them fresh.
>>18638930How's the bracelet on that one? Be honest
>>18638931You are asking a man who's most expensive watch is seiko cock tale.
>>18638906He posts in /uhg/ threads on /pol/ and coffee posts there.>>18638912He also has a gaming PC with red LED lights. He probably works at Siwa.
>>18638936Imagine being a 50 year old fat downie working as a stockboy in a grocery store and all you have to show for yourself is a shitter watch and a cringy gaymer pc..What are a grimm place this is..
>>18638931It's great. Easily adjustable. >>18638933I'm honored that you're keeping track. Does the top price of my most expensive watch being what it is mean that I don't know anything about the quality of the watches that I own? What's your most expensive watch? How many watches do you own?I own 50. If I were a stupid faggot like you I'd say you aren't qualified to say anything about watches if you have fewer than I do. Why are you a prick? Why are you taking out your misery on me? Do you feel personally attacked because you have one expensive watch and can't stop posting old pictures of it and I made light of that? Why don't you have a sense of humor? Is that part of being an autistic, obsessive son of a bitch?
>>18638945>If I were a stupid faggot“If” is unnecessary.
>>18638946What a stupid way to lay down that diss. I bet you're a woman.
>>18638946"Like you" is still there though.
>>18638933*whose
>>18638947>>18638948>samefaggingTo quote your post in >>18638945>Why don’t you have a sense of humorCan’t handle any banter. You must be American.
Wearing my Tomi while looking at my G-Shock.
>>18638952I wasn't samefagging.
>>18638955LMFAOsure
The best watch ever made, Héron Marinor will drop it's mark 2 soon.
Dead general.
>>18639076What are the changes?
>>18639112Bit thinner, better dial to case proportions, bit bigger indices. It's hard to improve on perfection.
Hello
>>18639121No date though, so it's worthless.
I'm really loving my new basic bitch PRX.
>>18639170really all anyone ever wanted was a sub $1000 steel sports watch on a bracelet. still surprised it tissot and not seiko or citizen or casio that delivered us the prx.
Why?
Seiko or Orient?
>>18639207Orient case sizes are way too big for anything but their dive watches. Seiko watches may have their issues or otherwise not be as good of a value proposition as they used to be, but they're more or less good watches all around without glaring flaws.
>>18639181There was no shortage of watches under $1k.
Thankfully most of the scuffs and whatnot aren't visible in this particular light and angle, but for a daily driver, I couldn't be happier
>>18639230No idea why the fuck it rotated itself, oops
>>18638515AE0432-07T
>>18639127>>18639230Sexo
Should I buy a Casio Marlin Duro or wait and save for this one?
>>18639230Can they make the hands even smaller?
>>186392314chan automatically deletes all the metadata from the posted pictures, including orientation.
I'm thinking about getting a citizen stiletto, should I do it?
>>18639263Yes, it's a cool watch. An anon had one here, maybe he'll post a picture.
>>18639256I like the day/date on this one but if I had to make this purchase, I would probably feel like I overpaid for what I got if the duro is an option. I also just like the aesthetic choices of the duro's design more anyways.
>>18639257I quite like their size
>>18639258That's strange because I never had to rotate it to begin with when I took the photo...I'll try again this afternoon
>>18638988There's really nothing to so with schizo tards like you. I can post the screenshot but EVERY time I do you cunts then double down and claim not only did I 'samefag', but then edited the image with software.There's no winning. You are an immature faggot and it doesn't matter what you believe.
>>18639207Lol, those are the choices, huh?
>>18639290Resize first. Dont post directly from phone.
Jealous much?
Do you guys ever post pics of your entire collections?
>>18639346Thanks for the advice, Anon.
Very comfortable,
thoughts?
>>18639383Mocca time.>>18639403Thin, easily readable, accurate- it's a good watch.>>18639207If used, Seiko. >>18639170They're very tightly regulated from the factory right? I assume yours shouldn't be more than 2 seconds off per day. It will always be a nice looking watch. Decent choice.>>18639170Good morning titanium solar perpetual calendar chad.>>18639076Just checked the website, everything is sold out. >>18639395Sometimes yes. This isn't everything. The casio is missing.About the video review on the white birch, I took a few one-takes but they ended up being 15minutes long. I'm getting better at this. Might soon upload it.
Treasure your watches and service them. They're a piece of Soul and history.Every piece means something to someone, and to a few of us, it has changed our lives. See you on monday.
>>18639268That's just a date. No day.
>>18639403Those are great. My dad wore one for years. Legible and the Indiglo is still one of the best things to ever hit watches IMO. Can't go wrong with a $50 Timex. People say they tick too audibly, but that's part of the charm of them.
>>18639407Those are just too big and round. It's even worse when they pair them with 18mm bracelets, but that one doesn't look too narrow. Solar is always cool. I don't like that the 12 is lowered for that digital shit. I don't like ana/digi really myself. But I'd rather it were at the bottom. Seiko just kind of bores me. Overpriced for what it is usually. What is that, $500 or more?
>>18639420Fucking kill yourself, attention whore. No one gives a fuck what you think. No one wants to listen to you pontificate about your Grand Seiko. Cunty snob. >>18639423You're going to be gone through the weekend?? That's GREAT news! No hurry.
>>18638849>We were cast out Are you going to tell everyone why?>Banished from 109 boards, but doesn’t tell you why.
>>18639436lol, jews reference. Because you're a crazy schizo who believes likes. Back to /pol/, chud. You aren't mature enough to discuss watches.
>>18638849avatarfags came after leaving g
>>18639439There’s a difference between discussing watches as a fashion accessory on a fashion board and a coordinated effort to spam the board and circlejerk. Same with the fragrance threads.Notice how both watch and fragrance threads are the same posts about people dropping hundreds of dollars on a small trinket or a bottle of perfume. Both are also generals and bumped to limit all the time. Both also don’t require one to actually be into fashion. You could he a fat fuck rotting in a bedroom but still post said small trinkets over and over.Maybe these threads should move to the finance board.
>>18639425I meant that I like the day/date on the Orient.
>>18639443>Maybe these threads should move to the finance boardOh god no anything but this, the only way things could get worse would be to have investment bros asking about Rolex ROI.
should i get an IWC portugeiser or Grand Seiko manual wind
>>18639522Yes.Both gay choices. Fitting. Get both.
>>18639522Get a weekdater.
hebrew slob mail-order non-fat yogurt chinese shitter +5min a day
>>18639170https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJVLZ7Xem8k
>>18639527im open to other suggestions for dress watches
>>18639528>seikosrsly kill yourself
>He can't afford a Seiko
>>18639557Erebus watches are cooler than Seikos.
>>18639543kys.
I came here a lot in 2017-2020, I miss having some fellow vintagechads to converse with
I just received this clock, it makes me happy, it fills the hole left by my Armani watch which I destroyed with a hammer in a fit of rage
>>18639573>I go get a hammer and smash my possessions when I'm angryI have never understood this kind of thing. Do people think you're dangerous? What the fuck?
>>18639574It was the only way to end the impasse in which I found myself struggling to put the backplate back on after replacing the battery. Also, I didn't like the watch anymore
>>18639528WeekdaterAnon here, this is not my post. Someone is posting as me, not the first time this has happened. Have a nice day!
>>18639395Picrel plus this >>18639165
Feels so good finally having a clock with near perfect accuracy without the need to be constantly on a phone >>18639573
>>18639575But you didn't anticipate it leaving the hole it did necessitating a desk clock.
>>18639591Yes
>>18639591Very happy that I didn't cave into buying g shock square which was very tempting for accuracy but repulßibe due to the many outdated marketing words plastered all over it
>>18639608If they would make a g shock square without any words printed on it I would buy immediately
>>18639574I smash things beyond unrepairability if I am done with them, without doing it I have this constant nag in my head to repair or at least try to repair it. Saves me a lot of time and headache.
what are some good sub 10k watches?
>>18639612It is a cathartic experience, isn't it
>>18639615Holy shit you must be rich as fuck
Really, it has been years since I felt so satisfied from buying something. This clock is great. It would be perfect if it didn't have the branding on the frame but it's not too distracting
>>18639395>Do you guys ever post pics of your entire collections?Not here. Usually just individual watches and not that often either.
>>18639623do you prefer the cartier or hermes more?
>>18639626If I was forced to keep only one, I’d pick the Cartier. But really, they’re completely different watches. The Hermès is a 100m WR sports watch and the Cartier is an ultra-thin dress watch with like 30m. I probably have too many sports watches.
>>18639623>when your cheapest watch is an MB&F
>>186396238 watches0 that tell the time correctly
>>18639629>When...What about it. Why did you write "when"?
GW-BX5600-1A1JFSweet, imagine it without all the unnecessary words printed all over it, and as a result it could be made smaller too
>>18639540
>>18639633I encourage you to keep calling out people on stupid meme statements like that. You are doing something that needed to be done.
>>18639623That’s like 70,000 dollars in that picture, on fucking watches. What do you do for a living?
>>18639641Not him and I never bought a watch over 300 bucks...But some many people spend 70k on a car when a 20k car is completely fine
>>18639634Cool. Not sure why it needs bluetooth for anything though. Is it like an atomic clock time setting thing? Or just connectivity for the sake of it?
>>18639641I'm a trust fund kid. The money just sits there and accrues interest. May as well enjoy the finer things.
>>18639641I’m a software developer. I’ve had a couple startups of mine get acquired and, after paying out my partners and employees, I was left with a nice windfall.Ignore this bitter little loser. >>18639652His kind could be told the prize is sitting in front of them on the coffee table and they still wouldn’t get up from the couch to get it. It’s easier to whine about the coffee table being too far away.
>>18639651Yeah I hate the fact they put Bluetooth. Supposedly to change the watch configuration through phone, somehow admitting their watch buttons are insufferable, all the while the target market for these are tinfoil hat guys who want to move away from smartphones and also the bluetooth is exploitable It's all a big fuck you
>>18639665Same. Admittedly, the app is easy and convenient to use. More so than the buttons on the watch, but if you have the phone…why do you need the watch in the first place?For me, I don’t even care about multiband anymore. Even the most basic G-Shock doesn’t lose more than a second or two per month and it’s easy to re-sync with your PC’s clock on Daylight Saving Time days.
>>18639657No you're not.
>>18639672Not what?
>>18639623What Moser is that? Is it steel or precious metal?
>>18639651>>18639665>>18639666Do you guys really need to be so negative about a feature?The Bluetooth needs to be physically turned on for it to work. You can use it to sync time once per week if you don't want it to be connected the whole time.It's still way more convenient than adjusting the seconds manually.Also the app helps you adjust your settings easily. Casio's buttons are not very easy or straight-forward to use, that is a fact.If you think someone will hack your watch through your phone just to mess with you, that is quite paranoid. Especially since you can just keep the watch's bluetooth turned off 99.9999% of the time anyway. Or you could keep it off 100% of the time, but then you don't get to reap the benefits of course.Also, out of all the things that can be hacked and exploited, the fucking time on your watch should be the last of your worries.
>>18639685>Do you guys really need to be so negative about a feature?We don’t need to be positive about it. It’s a thing we don’t like yet something we have to pay for since an otherwise-identical watch without the feature is unavailable.It’s not like the people you quoted are having a meltdown. They’re offering criticism and their opinions. I think you’re seeing fighting where there’s none.
>>18639687It's nuts how badly people want to fight on the internet. Even the mildest criticism or dismissal is met with "why you hate bro? u mad? r u mad bro?"The second I made my post I alt tabbed back into space marine 2 and sipped my bourbon. I don't give a single fuck about you or your wrong opinions.
I will now post a watch.
A watch.
There, i posted a watch, like i said i would. This is a watch thread. I posted a watch in a watch thread. Post more watches, this is a watch thread. Thank you!
Master of Eggs
>>18639684>What Moser is that? Is it steel or precious metal?Depending on the year it was made it’s either a Mayu or Endeavour Small Seconds. (They changed the name at some point in the early 2010’s)It’s probably white gold but may be platinum or palladium.It’s from the based pre-Meylan era of Moser when they made ridiculously good watches and lost money on every watch sold. Lange-tier finishing, innovative technology, everything.Then the Meylan family took over and started cutting costs and turned the brand into a meme factory. They stopped doing only precious metals and started making cheap steel shitters.If you look at one of the older ones side-by-side with a new one, it’s like night and day. The older ones were a steal for the price, the new ones are a ripoff.
>>18639666>don’t even care about multiband anymoreFor me it's a must. I expect nothing less of a watch than to be fully autonomous and accurate. I hate the feeling of checking if a watch has the right time while it should be telling me the time not the other way around. I may have mild autism btw
>>18639685>If you think someone will hack your watch through your phone just to mess with you, that is quite paranoid.I don't think someone will, but I refuse to accept that someone could if it's not needed
>>18639687Exactly right.
Perpetual calendar until the year 2099, brethren. This is truly living. I never knew I wanted this but now I can see what I was missing.
>>18639726How far off is your watch going to get that it's actually a problem? Even if it's 2 minutes off, is someone going to die because you thought it was 2 minutes later or 2 minutes earlier?
>>18639732People like you disgust me.
>>18639733By the way I can't tell you why, and I am sure you could be a nice guy. But there is something about the level of not giving a fuck about the truth and standards that I associate with such sentiments.
>>186397322 minutes is the difference between life or death. Try staying under water for 2 minutes. Try being 2 minutes late at work repeatedly. Try missing your bus, train, airplane because you were 2 minutes late. 2 minutes is 120 mississipis (at least it used to be before time constriction was deployed by the elites) which is a big fucking deal
>>18639733>>18639734It's not that you shouldn't give a fuck, it's that at some point you have to accept that there's always going to be error in anything you're measuring and any tool you're measuring with and just get along with your life. You could just as easily apply that logic to the atomic time system - why is the time they're telling you the actual time? Because they say so? What if it's actually not?Does any of this matter if you still got to work on time? I used to be super autistic about tracking how much time my watches gain and lose using a watch app and try to keep exact up to the second time as much as I could, but at some point I realized that I'm just wearing out the keyless works on my watches for no good practical reason. It's not making me any more punctual or affecting my schedule at all if my watch is 4 seconds or even 4 minutes off. So now if I know my watch loses a few seconds a day I just set it 2 minutes fast and let it ride for a week or two until I swap it for something else. Even a watch that's off 30 seconds a day is still close enough to time 15 minutes for a coffee break or whatever. It's just not a big deal at all.
>>18639736But you're not going to be 2 minutes late knowing that your watch could be off by as much as 2 minutes. You should always try to be 5-10 minutes early regardless. When I'm late for work it's not because my watch was off, it's because I woke up late and got stuck behind a school bus and didn't make it through intersections before the lights turned red. The time my watch says had nothing to do with it.
>>18639741>five minutes early is ten minutes lateArmy flashbacks
>>18639741let me put it this way: you get to choose between 2 watches, one is accurate, one is not accurate, they are the same other than that. which one do you pick and why?
>>18639772A better question would be to choose between:- a watch that is perfectly accurate but ugly- a watch that you really like the look of but gains 5 seconds per dayWhich do you choose and why?
>>18639772How accurate are we talking? just the usual average quartz vs the average mechanical? Because if we're talking casio vs rolex I'll take rolex every time, it's more than accurate enough to be practical and it's a better looking watch. My beater automatics are 10-30 seconds a day slow and I still prefer them to just wearing casios to work.Again, it's really not that big of a deal and I live by that statement. I'm not just being contrarian or hipster or something. This is the way watches were for the last hundred years, you'd set your watch to whatever the clock in front of the bank or post office said on your way to work and not only did your watch drift off farther and farther day by day but you didn't even know for sure how accurate the bank clock was, but it was close enough to function day to day.
>>18639774The watch you like is the only answer every time.
Watch out, i'm posting a watch!
>>18639522Cum time.
