>>107852042
I've used archinstall many many times it works perfectly every time if you want a tonne of custom shit do it after installation I guess.

>>107851260
>he wasnt mentally scarred as a 7 year old by getting goatse'd

ngmi zoom zoom. we got blasted with criminally gay porn when we were mere children and enjoyed it. millenials are just better than you.

>>107851260
doesn't make >>107851184 wrong though

File: 1408248579934.png (64 KB, 800x488)

64 KB PNG

>>107850687

>>107851673
Right, didn't consider Fedora ships without third party codecs. Gonna give Aurora a closer look.
>>107851794
Not a bad idea.
>>107851986
Bazzite didn't impress me much, but I imagine someone who doesn't even know how to open the terminal and installs a new program once every five years might have a better experience with atomic distros.

>>107852055
If they can survive with everything being installed from flatpak and working properly through flatpak and not have the system break on update due to a bad image update then it could work

>>107852024
It's a known issue on KDE. Well, at least it's known to the users. I'm not sure if it was ever reported.

>>107852037
>one random person having his system break due to some btrfs bug is a proof
Yeah sure, I'll definitely believe 1 person using Linux on 1 device for a week vs myself (also 1 person) who has used over a dozen distributions on a dozen different devices over the past 10+ years.

>>107852045
When it comes to overall OS stability one can only use anecdotal evidence. It's not like there's some long running objective stability benchmark when it comes to Linux desktops. And it's not like Ubuntu, Arch, Manjaro and Debian don't have multiple articles explaining that a system upgrade has completely bricked devices or introduced critical system breakage.
So yes, I'm speaking from the experience of myself and half a dozen people I personally know who have used Linux for a while now. That anon is only using one random guy on the internet as "evidence".

>>107852191
>proof doesnt count unless i say so
>systems break but its ok when my system breaks
If you're going to continue being disingenuous then nobody has any reason to believe anything you say.

>>107852229
>be disingenuous
>claim other people are
I see exactly what you're doing. But in case you're not being maliciously disingenuous here and are actually this unintelligent, at least try thinking about this for more than 1 second.

You've only shown 1 instance of an atomic/immutable system breaking (for an unspecified reason?) and you use it as your only proof that "atomic distributions are unstable compared to non-atomic ones". You're clearly appealing to the popularity of a youtuber and giving more weight to your claim of instability just because some random ass video got 400k views. Okay, let's play that game. Linus from LTT has broken a non-atomic distribution by simply trying to install Steam. So by your logic, non-atomic distributions are 10x less stable because a more relevant celebrity got 4.5M views.

You're also completely ignoring the fact that technologically speaking the whole point of atomic updates and immutable systems is to ensure they're less prone to breaking compared to the regular clusterfuck operating systems which don't have any safeguards. Oh and let's also ignore the fact that SteamOS and Android (the most popular Linux OS) are provably more stable than "standard" distributions even if the end users mod them quite a bit.

>>107847893
You might genuinely be suffering from brainrot. Stop using AI and try to re-train the condition of your brain. I am serious, it will only get worse as you outsource more and more of your "thinking" to the machine.

>I am thinking of a number
>>is the number .... <literally any other number>
>No
>>OMG HOW COULD YOU KNOW THAT IMMEDIATELY?!?!?!?

>>107850940
lol there are millions of apps in the app stores, and you think *you're* gonna notice all the new ones that show up?

>>107848511
i've been programming since before you were born, faggot. if you don't embrace emerging technologies, then prepare to be left behind.

>>107848049
"oh boo hoo, somebody is being productive...i better shit on them, since i'm a do-nothing loser."

>>107847983
i'm billing $50/hr on 2 of them and $100/hr on the other.

>>107852353
No?

>>107852353
Do what you want?

>>107852382
I need the /g/ hivemind to take a decision for me.

>>107852394
Why do you want to use PS/2?

>>107846288
H-how do i do this on win10?

All i'm hearing are the MSN messenger notification sounds.

File: cxmcagxmtpl91.jpg (452 KB, 1920x1200)

452 KB JPG

It's funny how Aero is remembered so fondly, where as in reality when it came out it was way too taxing for like 95% of systems. People ended up turning all of the features off or just used XP instead.
Sure the style looks nice and futuristic, but from a practical point of view it was a big miscalculation on Microsoft's part putting such a resource hungry style on by default.
I think this is one of the main reasons why Vista was so hated, it was just too heavy to run.
Back then the computer enthusiast circles were so much smaller, that even many of the more computer savvy people didn't really understand much about GPUs and CPU was just something where more gigahertz better.
People used random prebuilts with crappy specs that were more fit for the year 2000 than +2007 and back then CPU progress was staggering. Things got outdated really fast back then.

But then again the love for Aero is less about the style itself and more about the era and how much better things were back then.
Besides the current aesthetics are so fucking terrible, that you could pick almost any style from our history and compared to the modern soulless flat globalist prison aesthetic, it's infinitely more preferable.

>>107852316
It wasnt a miscalculation retard.

First they created the Problem (PCs not strong enough for new OS)

And then they sold the solution (better hardware)

>>107852316
>MS wants to show off fancy 3d accelerated GUI
>users shit themselves in rage
For once MS was in the right and it was OEMs and retards slapping vista onto hardware that was barely suitable for XP.

File: 1752156394717303.jpg (62 KB, 1280x946)

62 KB JPG

>>107850286
Ftfy

>>107850286
Me on the left but with Windows 11 and Copilot.

File: gpl_cuck.jpg (52 KB, 1194x648)

52 KB JPG

>>107850337

>>107850286
>>107852322
I'm on the left side, I never heard about artix and I don't want to install Arch linux. Thanks, but I'll stick to Debian, Ubuntu, openSUSE and Fedora. I just want my system to werk, installing codecs is already too much for me... I will never do this again.

File: IMG_1708.jpg (391 KB, 1206x2018)

391 KB JPG

>>107852338
china china china. i know all about china

This thread makes my head hurt.. but to those in the thread of the opinion that what is present here is sacrilege what do you suggest those of us who don't want to learn in the conventional ways do to create fun projects without using LLMs reading documentation only takes one so far, using LLMs to learn a means of doing something seems to me to be a fair use of the tool. Let's say I wanted to write something cool not some basic calculator or any other lame baby's first project, the options available to me are stumble in the dark, or tutorial hopping no? And if OP was to do either of these things he would probably abandon the project before seeing any of the fruits of his meager labour. I suppose my question is what's the point? If the LLM helps him to get to where he wants to be sooner what's the harm?

>>107848423
Pixel art is an art style, not a technological description. A render of a vector graphic onto a raster canvas doesn't make the vector graphic raster.

>>107851947
What all "traditional" examples of voxel rendering have in common is that the rendering technique derives from the idea that a 3D volume is a collection of discrete and uniform atomic elements, as opposed to a collection of surfaces to be approximated using polygons. Those "2.5D" engines that use colored spans are still rooted in that approach. They just introduce all kinds of constraints and quality concessions for the sake of performance.

>>107852161
>3D volume is a collection of discrete and uniform atomic elements,
Something which >>107848290 doesn't have, while minecraft and every other mesh-based voxel renderer such as OP's does.
>as opposed to a collection of surfaces to be approximated using polygons
Let me humor you this. What if you instead extract the surface voxels as just points and upload them to the GPU. You then render that pointcloud using billboards that perfectly covers the voxels, and then crop those billboards in a fragment shader to precisely fit the voxel's shape. Is that a real voxel renderer? No polygons or surfaces are involved.
This is a real technique btw https://www.jcgt.org/published/0007/03/04/paper.pdf

>>107851925
>>107852285
>unable to come up with any original thought or to respond to my points with anything but appeal to perceived authority.
It's a useless argument about what a technical term refers to, you absolute cretin. Settling this matter doesn't require any deep thought, only accounting for how the term came into wide circulation. That fucking Comanche game alone accounts for a good 50% of that and Ken Silverman probably accounts for another 30.

What does require a bit of thinking is to realize WHY they used to call engines like Voxel Space "voxel rendering" when the only 3D thing about them is the impression they create, but you're getting filtered by this even after having it spelled out.

Maybe I need to dumb it down further for you? They called this stuff voxel rendering because the way you arrive at such techniques is, you start from the idea of full-fledged volume rendering and then ask yourself "what corners can I cut to make this run on consumer hardware?", so you arrive at ideas like a heightmapped terrain being a special case of the general problem - one that allows you to render batch voxels into columns and reduce columns into spans.

I don't care about your 105 IQ autist philosophizing about fragment shaders and GPUs.

>>107823941
Pickup a recorder to be with you. Walk outside, or watch a movie, or do some basic house chores—many more things you can do, and if something sounds attuned, record it

>>107849234
maybe they will rename it to ableton studio like what fender just did

>>107846417
by that standard any paid gig is slop tier

>>107849234
It's ok, most of the users don't realize it's meant to be used live and will never see a stage or a booth anyways

>>107845449
Just ordered Intellimouse Pro to replace my IE3.0 because it's completely dead this time
Intellimouse best mouse ever made

>>107851744
Best mouse ever made or just the only one you're used to

>>107851744
Have both. They are okay mice.
Would consider them high end office mice.

>>107845449
Every mouse I have ever used has felt the exact same so idk why people act like they make a huge difference.

I guess the special autistic ones with all the extra buttons and pads may be different but those don’t even seem to be popular anymore

>>107848500
yep.
wmo
1.1
3.0
mx518
g303 are the only mice that I've ever stuck out with for a longer period of time than a month or two. truly greats

>>107848857
Modern life sucks so much. Also I miss truly anonymous forums and sites.

>>107850417
The 90's internet sucked. It was so slow and everything was text. No fun pics or videos.
Also there were no design patterns so every website was different.

>>107848857
what the fuck is wrong with americans?

>>107848857
>"snapchat" reported this to the FBI
most likely, someone in the groupchat reported her and snapchat took action

>>107851104
What? It was free, and that made it better than anything now

>>107851026
I mean if you could always just use the TSforge method instead if you wanted to.

File: 1465746747.png (283 KB, 578x599)

283 KB PNG

the windows 11 media creation tool put a permanent write lock on my usb drive and it cant be removed or circumvented by any of the published workarounds.
I want to thank microjeets for killing my thumb drive

>>107852133
it was most certainly, and undoubtedly, a skill issue

>>107852155
the tool threw a microsoft like fault massage
>it didnt work :(
>but we ourself not sure why, tehe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>just try again
and after that the stick was fried

>>107852291
had this happen some times just transferring files to a USB, the thing just gets locked and it goes to shit, it's likely a firmware corruption or some kind of hardware failure, the USB puts itself on read only mode and it's pretty much impossible to fix it, but it's almost always just bad luck or a shitty USB that couldn't handle a simple transfer

File: 27aa04a3d33d64388ec5e7e7d(...).png (472 KB, 904x817)

472 KB PNG

bamp

>>107847486
My dac normally took days to setup in Windows, I had to find the driver from some shady website every time.
Linux worked straight away, that's when I changed over.

>>107849838
>Due to the boomers that ran the place
now imagine the same place with lunix

>>107847486
I spent 3 days testing Linux distros on some shitbox PC someone brought to me, just to find one that worked. Debian wouldn't install power management utilities with xfce, multiple flavours of Ubuntu hung during install, mx worked but was too fucking lardy, bodhi and wattos had broken sound, antix refused to render the desktop, fyde refused to boot, kolibri requires you to build it just to try it, i really wanted loc to work as it ran the best but again sound didn't work. Finally lubuntu didn't hang during install and sound worked, I don't like it but I'm not getting paid to keep going. This is a fucking normal ass old Intel laptop and there's no excuse for this shitfest

>>107852212
>mx worked but was too fucking lardy
How ancient is the e-waste you're using?

>>107845371
>ime doesnt work over nat
doubt.jpg

NAT is not something you configure in the BIOS. The firmware has no idea if it's behind NAT or something else entirely, all that it knows is that it sent a screenshot to ime.intel.com and got a 200 OK back.

File: file (1).jpg (38 KB, 625x416)

38 KB JPG

>>107851575
its not about bios settings but making it physically impossible to communicate with the internet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4cOQOXjxew&t=949s

>>107851682
nvm this is about things coming in and hitting ime, not ime sending shit out. hmmm

>>107840951
>4c/8t
>16g RAM
>256g storage
>437 bongbucks
verily nigga thou jest

>>107841084
Show code

File: scr lock.jpg (150 KB, 1360x961)

150 KB JPG

>>107840221
Obvious bait.
This motherfucker right here is the true relic.
In the roughly 35 years I've used computers I've never needed to use it, and I have never met a single person who has ever used it.

>>107849936
I recently figured out that those two keys next to Print Screen are perfect for Volume Down and Volume Up. No program needs them and they are super easy to locate. Would recommend instead of getting some weirdo layout that doesn't have them.

>>107840221
kys shill

>>107840221
Do they include this on cheap 15" laptops just to push you into buying an expensive one with a centered keyboard

>>107840221
ITT op is a retard and doesnt use his pc for work, especially mathematical work.
Its silly you even made this thread, half the laptops out there in recent years have been jamming the number pad into them for greater functionality. Yet here you are being a faggot.
I will not bump this thread, im also going to report it for being low effort.

File: 1768316412106-019bb7de-3e(...).jpg (1.15 MB, 1792x2400)

1.15 MB JPG

I was lurking a moment on /vig/, I had no idea that there's even a virtual youtuber AI general.