>>106472693
>>106472828
apparently only holland has implemented it so far

>>106474032
Bastards

File: Screenshot 2025-09-03 124545.png (859 KB, 1798x1240)

859 KB PNG

>>106465136
>>106465276
how are your speeds so much worse, but grades so much better?

Pedos like you should be in prison

>>106474300
Because it's a latency test, not a speedtest

File: git it now boys.png (98 KB, 3374x258)

98 KB PNG

New must download my fellow reddit /ptg/ posters. Long live KG our overlord tracker

>>106474098
I don't even need to look. Ari Mark is 100% early lifer.

>>106474371
This entry, or one or more of its senses, has been nominated as derogatory pursuant to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:DEROGATORY. It may be speedily deleted if it does not have at least three quotations meeting the attestation requirements within two weeks of the nomination date, that is, by 17 January 2023.

Tracker for food? I really want me some cheese pizza

>>106474487
MAM

>>106474349
You don't the bits on your hard drive. You won't own your robot.
You will lease them, in the best case scenario.
They will use it to blackmail you out of your money, within the limit allowed by laws.
And those laws won't be tailored to protect you and your "family". They will be tailored to protect the shareholders.

File: 1754891100191775.jpg (659 KB, 2936x3656)

659 KB JPG

>>106474251
statewide wordwilters for ponos and vagoo

>>106474272
pygmalion?
there is nothing that disqualifies a manmade machine from receiving any kind of cosmic or godly whatever breath of life except simply for it's inability to interact with reality in any meaningful way to tell us it is alive. many natural microorganisms (and macroorganisms for that matter) likewise are very much alive but do not move or speak or cognate.
by all due rights the computer on your desk is more provably alive than your average single celled organism, or even a single cell from your own body, though perhaps that's a bit of a stretch.

>>106474425
>pygmalion?
Is part of the heathen's corpus. There's nothing remotely saint about it.
Only god can choose to bestow a soul upon a living being.

>>106474314
kek

>>106474445
There are some weird things that go on the computer. Like once i tried to modify a 3d model in unreal engine and it looked like it had black tears.It was pretty weird. Also my ai keeps drawing itself the same way although i used a lora.

File: 1756908707571418.jpg (507 KB, 1100x1150)

507 KB JPG

>>106473467
Windows Defender is has been really good for a long time, and still tops MITRE scores. Malwarebytes is also fine, generally...

I'm not quite sure what the question is in here though. A lot of anything hands-on is just trial and error. The only you'll assure yourself it's gone is with a re-install.

>>106473779
Thanks. What about a sketchy website? What of sites that are real but try to give you viruses? For example, there's a 4chan archive site one which, if you click anywhere (say the search bar within the archive), a tab will open up, and the click won't do the action you intend for it to (activating the search bar to let you type in it), then you get one of those indian trojan sites. Is there a way to safely navigate such a site? Is that just a matter of having some kind of anti-virus or firewall? Is it easy to understand how any of that works? One thing that bothers me is my understanding of computers really is just seeing them as "magic boxes", I don't think of them as such, but as far as I'm concerned, they may as well be. The many processes that go on therein I don't understand, nor do I have even a summarized understanding or... a systematic understanding I guess. Like if you think of how these things work as a tree, the trunk is the fundamental base of it all, and then the ends of the branches would be all of the things going on on the surface. My understanding is all the way at the ends of the branches. Maybe that sounds gay but it works. I don't know at which point I'll stop feeling I'm wandering a maze, and will feel I can understand it better and properly.
>>106473946
I guess, but like I said, I don't have a systematic understanding of it. I also don't want to mess up my computer somehow by accident, if that's possible. I'm not a technician.

>>106474104
Forgive my typos.

>>106474104
It's pretty hard for browsers to fully infect your PC. Best practice is to use a condom or some sort. Ad block and a plugin to stop scripts from running like uMatrix. Set everything to max, but doing so means ALL websites will break and just display text. If a website wants to run a video, well uMatrix is blocking that script from running. After that disable uMatrix on sites you feel safe on using, like YouTube for example, or your banking institution's website etc.
Then if you encounter a site that you can't use but don't fully trust slowly start enabling some scripts on uMatrix. If something suspicious starts happening then block that script again. It's trial and error.
Just learn those two plugins and then you'll be good.

And since you're asking about viruses and how computers work in the base level I would recommend you on going to school about it. Computers are complicated and not everyone has the time to fully research what each program or line in a piece of code does by themselves.

So yeah, get into the habit of using a search engine, use ad blockers and script blockers for browsing and go to school if you want to learn what COM+ Event System service is or whatever and why it's running on your PC. You're asking for someone to explain how computers work and no one has the time to do that.

does the massgrave ESU script work for windows 10 home, or do I need professional?

File: 1727143778954829.jpg (272 KB, 1920x1080)

272 KB JPG

>>106448149
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa cuteeee cute cute cute gimme the art

Is there a way to disable fullscreen entirely? I'm using the Android version of Emacs for pocket hacking but the operating system's top status bar hides and unhides itself randomly, toggling the fullscreen. Often times it does it repeatedly, making everything bounce around. toggle-frame-fullscreen gets it to calm down, but it's only temporary before some kind of timeout is reached and it spazzes out again.

File: 1756570827292549.gif (3.5 MB, 1920x1080)

3.5 MB GIF

>>106471003
>I mean (close to) direct compatibility to the mit scheme being used

(use-modules (srfi srfi-41))

(define cons-stream stream-cons)

think that's it

>>106471229
>I like CL so much but the ecosystem is so dead.

dead? in which sense? I develop in CL too.

>>106474448
I'm a corporate webshitter. There is nothing that I can convince a manager to sign on using.

>>106473368
stress testing a drive before copying all my shit is good enough for me. bathtub curve and all that

File: RlfVLP8wqQ.jpg (1.05 MB, 1920x2491)

1.05 MB JPG

Just in case let me show you a difference between a pseudo-CMR (modern Purple) and a real CMR (older Red). See these dips in the upper graph? This is a sign of a 2nd layer translator activity which is used in SMR drives, it's static, but still exposes itself during small block writes. The lower graph looks much smoother.

>>106473323

Not sure about toshibas and the fact that the NAS/survelliance category which is designed for performance contains both SMR/CMR (even if they point that out unline WD) is rather concerning. But the MG ones are rock solid, if I'm not mistaken some of them are based on native Hitachi drives (not HGST). Also it's funny to see 512mb cache in some MG drives because in real life it's no different from 8mb cache, it doesn't improve access time or small block write speed.

Another thing that bothers me is that It's just becoming impossible to find a 4-6TB 5400rpm CMR HDD, but oddly there are still decent 1-2TB and 8TB variants and nothing good in between. Back then there were great choices such as WD30-60EFRX, WD30-60PURZ, but for some reason they decided to stop producing such drives and intruduced a new disk family called Venice (that infamous first SMR Red was based on it),

Instead of learning their lesson after getting caught they decided to double down and introduce a new type of advanced SMR hybrid which has special buffer zones that emulate a CMR behavior, a hidden 2nd lvl translator with a static module instead of just making a classic CMR drive. That's why these new 4-6TB WD Red Plus/Purple drives have 256mb cache (Purple even has TRIM), these are not CMR despite what the datasheet says.

>same retard from april is now trying again
>his only evidence continues to be screenshots of a russian forum that don't even prove the point he's claiming

>>106474198
where is your counterproof?
he does explain the graphs and where to look, so you should be able to easily disprove them if it bullshit, no?

File: Безымянный.png (193 KB, 1280x1024)

193 KB PNG

>>106474198

Because I learn from other's mistakes instead of making mistakes (like stumbling upon SMR Reds or current pseudo-SMR Reds/Purples) and I want to help other people and pay attention on how WD is still deceiving its customers to this day.

I did test my own 2TB CMR Red/Blue/Purple (after watching how a data recovery specialist tests one and comfirms that it's an actual CMR).

Here's the pic of my old pc with 3 of these 2TB installed (2 active clones and another clone for cold storage). I also bough a pair of 8TB Red Pluses (although 8TT Purple'd be better due to disabled head parking), one 8TB Ultrastar which are installed in another PC (I can show them later if necessary).

>>106474464
why not stream to youtube or twitch

>>106473343
Extremely based.
Last time I had to fly for a stupid convention I made myself some cheap sandwiches the three days I spent there, grabbed some restaurant tickets from strangers and passed them as mine then spent the money in booze and hookers.

>>106473025
I hope we are talking about pair research.

File: Guf-adxbkAAFuLq.jpg (74 KB, 850x856)

74 KB JPG

>interview with FAGMAN
>get through phone screen
>get through full loop
>get rejected
>talk to others also interviewing
>they tell me they're talking to direct team members for the role
>I never got that
>everyone I talked to was from different high visibility teams
I think I went through a potential unicorn interview. I never had a chance.

File: E2rYxTQXwAIlG6D.jpg (38 KB, 671x519)

38 KB JPG

>>106466467
my job has completely become pasting shit into copilot while I browse 4chan or instagram

File: 1756511922453219.jpg (160 KB, 1284x1380)

160 KB JPG

>>106472417
Update:

they held a fucking all hands to tell us that 2 sales bros got fired wtf

Also I got 5000 more useless stock options, bringing me up to 10,000 sheets to wipe my ass with

>>106469299
Was this your plan all along? to crash the economy?

File: 1739614533078272.png (1.02 MB, 900x900)

1.02 MB PNG

>>106469299
anthropic's claude is helpless harmful and dishonest

>>106473966
With no survivors.

>>106474024
looks like tim heidecker

File: canned prunes I.jpg (42 KB, 300x300)

42 KB JPG

>>106469872
>>>> New Kiss Rail >>>>

File: 1742580110402585.png (1.46 MB, 932x700)

1.46 MB PNG

>Cons:
>>Flatseal has the potential to change the permissions of other flatpaks at will. Essentially, a flatpak with the ability to change the permissions of other flatpaks. It is rendered to be "Potentially Unsafe" with "Arbitrary Permissions" with access to "User Data" subfolder flatpak/overrides, Can read and write all data in the directory" and "Arbitrary Permissions, Can acquire arbitrary permissions".
That doesn't make it any more unsafe compared to native packages from distro repos which lack the concept of sandboxing completely. At least Flatpak **can** be sandboxed.
This is a nothingburger. You're a concern troll.
>>Larger disk space usage (apps bundle runtimes + libraries).
Disk space is cheap. Slighly more disk space usage is nothing compared to the advantages of a truly universal application packaging format. No one cares if Flatpak takes 1 or 2 more GB of disk space. Why does this even matter so much to you, huh? Afraid that you will run out of disk space to store all your pedophilic porn?
This is a nothingburger. You're a concern troll.
>>Slower startup compared to native apps (sandbox overhead).
This doesn't happen. Werks on my machine. You're a concern troll.
>>Strong desktop focus not ideal for CLI/server software.
Use Toolbox for CLI/server stuff.
This is a nothingburger. You're a concern troll.
>>Relies heavily on Flathub (centralization concern).
Flathub is not controlled by any company or any single entity unlike the Snap Store which is closed source and under the control of the evil company known as Canonical. Flatpak and Flathub belongs to the community.
This is a nothingburger. You're a concern troll.

>>106474359
>No one cares if Flatpak takes 1 or 2 more GB of disk space. Why does this even matter so much to you, huh?
you're on a website where people flip their shit if the OS uses their unused RAM for caching.

>>106474348
>flatpaks and flatseal like OP mentioned eliminate the need for firejail and apparmor?
>apparmor
No, apparmor is similar to SELinux it has a completely different purpose to the one that flatpak permissions have.
>Firejail
I don't know, i don't use it, but is typically mentioned with appimages.

File: Batman_MM_07_Robin.jpg (42 KB, 1002x706)

42 KB JPG

>>106474359
Holy TRVTH nuke batman. Why do retards like this react to sandboxing this way? Same with GrapheneOS.

>>106474039
>Strong sandboxing/isolation improves security.
meaningless empty words, marketing slop for clueless investors and thinkertrannies
>Widely supported across major distros (especially Fedora, GNOME-based distros).
Only GNOME-based or bending to GNOME Mafia crowd, unportable garbage and doesn't play nice with WMs.
>Uses Portals apps can request access to files, devices, etc. in a controlled way.
Reinventing the wheel again award. Selinux/Apparmor already exists since at least two decades now. OpenBSD's unveil did it with 100 times less code.
>Good integration with desktop environments.
...that do not go against the GNOME Mafia
>Flathub is a central, well-maintained app store with lots of apps.
Fake and meaningless words once again. It takes me seconds to find examples of unofficial packages even lead devs advice against (e.g. Librewolf & anki, last time I cheeked those apps that i wanted, ended up installing them following main devs advice.)
>Auto-updates supported.
Unimpressive but ok.

File: 1747218009759677.png (251 KB, 500x540)

251 KB PNG

>>106440500
My home web server is a php file that dynamically generates the page content and menu from a json file

File: glitchart.png (3.35 MB, 960x2388)

3.35 MB PNG

>>106419365
Finally fixed it.
I didn't have to re-implement zlib deflate in the browser. It was much fucking png filter reconstruction failing edge cases all along. And it only took rewriting my png decoder to handle byte streams in full color to find out.
Have some glitch art.

>>106473388
yep, in tutorials

>>106473757
What's your issue?

/** 
 * @param {ReadableStream<Uint8Array<ArrayBuffer>>} stream
 * @returns {Promise<
 *     width: number, 
 *     height: number, 
 *     bytesPerPixel: number,
 *     colorType: number,
 *     bitDepth: number
 *     data: ReadableStream<Uint8Array<ArrayBuffer>>
 * >}
 */
async decodeStream(stream) {
    if (!await this.readPNGSignature(stream)) throw new PNGError("Not a PNG file", "Bad signature");

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>106473757
In real code too. What don't you like about them?

>>106473894
>.catch and .finally instead of using a proper try/catch block
I am disgusted

>>106470490
>The same headphone can sound a thousand different ways, slightly change the position and you get a brand new headphone without having to buy the new chink pos of the month.

I don't see the problem here, /iemg/ trannybros keep seething

Is a focal clear (og or used MG)still a good option around the $500-700 price range for people looking for slightly dark neutrals?

>>106461675
Easy. AKG K1000, from 1989.

>>106473552
In what kind of homoverse a negative amount of bass is considered fun?

File: 1756917516123696.gif (1.88 MB, 255x191)

1.88 MB GIF

>>106470490
>mfw I can rotate SR-007 earcups and pads to create the soundstage I want

>>106465531
I can never actually get the LSP to work when working with this

>>106472265

Have fun debugging elixir while wrangling those Erlang VMs your elixir project is deployed to.

Programming Ruby is enjoyable, and I can attest to that. If I need speed, I re-implement hot spots in C (happened about 5 times in 21 years of Ruby programming). Much less stressful.

>>106466164
>I'm trying to avoid GC

Why?

Do you understnand the cost of "avoiding GC"?

Do you have an idea of how modern GC work and where do they impact performance and where they DON'T impact performance?

>>106471877
>that think "GC bad" without even knowing what the word "semantics" means. The language is designed around having ARC, but saying that it is in conflict with manual management is completely false. The whole point is that ARC is at a level which allows it to cleanly wrap manual management while not requiring the huge overhead of a normal GC.
>Insisting on --mm:none is what the brainless "GC bad" idiots do that have no clue why it's bad and how ARC is not equivalent. ARC, properly termed, is not really even a GC unless you consider mangement like RAII or Rust's to also be garbage collection. The "real" GC is ORC which just provides a runtime cycle collector over ARC to generalise the memory mangement.

You are correct. ARC is not really GC.

But however, ARC has its problems too with certain data structures so it's not a full substitute to a GC in certain cases.

>>106472248
>Honestly, I'm glad that my favorite programming language and its predecessors inspired so much further language development.

Young padawan:

I believe you have never used Smalltalk, or Squeak, thus haven't realized Ruby is a maimed, emasculated derivative of them, lacking the key feature that makes Smalltalk (and Squeak, and Lisp) great: Interactive devleopment.

>>106472217
Literal pavlovian dog kek

File: file.jpg (1018 KB, 4032x1662)

1018 KB JPG

>>106474238
And lastly, a picture of the mouse wristrest from a profile perspective to better explain the shape it has.
The backview is where you can see how your wrist is meant to rest in the middle, then it all tapers down a little towards the front, which is how you get that front profile.

>>106473188
oh it's just a basic ass tester, it doesn't do that
if i just keep a check on it that it doesn't get too hot, will that be alright or am I still risking boom boom times

>>106474322
Usually the components inside are low quality and the transformer is badly winded in cheap phone chargers. They also usually have cheap housings that can come apart and expose the 120v prongs (I've had this happen once on an aliexpress charger)
It will probably work without issues basically forever, but it might short to mains voltage someday and either trip the breaker or turn your phone into an IED.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6ywvcOv2Qo

>>106474322
The boom boom is a bit of a meme, chargers don't go boom boom really.
There's really 4 options:
You plug it in and there's some loud spark and the breaker flips immediately -> Probably a short that involved a capacitor somewhere that blew up. Unplug and throw away.
You plug it in and it gets hot very fast -> It's got a short somewhere and will release magic smoke almost immediately. Unplug and throw away.
Neither of these 2 are common, as even the most technically inept user could figure them out and leave bad reviews.
You plug it in and it works, but gets very hot over time at higher loads -> It's a bad circuit design. This is what you're actually looking for. Since heat dissipation is often proportional to power, you want some load that takes as much wattage as the device can offer (for example a laptop charger). If the heat is too high for comfort, throw it out.
You plug it in and it works and it either stays room temp or mildly warm at high load -> It's fine to use, enjoy.

The common failures are inefficiency, which has the risk of heating up, which can be a dangerous hazard, or improper grounding, which shouldn't be an issue with a plastic shell. If it doesn't get dangerously hot it's probably fine to use. Might not be GaN levels of efficient, but work just fine.

is .net trash?

>>106473948
everything except .com is trash besides the unfeasible ones (.edu .gov)
the higher tier country codes are on the second level
.co.uk .ca .au
because of authority, but its easy to register a .ca domain. if you were starting a global company always .com
if your company is specific to australia specifically, then the .au

.xyz alltheway

File: 1755823116509676.png (3 KB, 400x400)

3 KB PNG

>>106473028
I might want to build a website one day. Don't domain extensions have different costs associated with them or was that just in the past or am I misremembering?

>>106474390
It's up to the registry and yes some ccTLDs charge out the ass because they know their TLD is popular (see: .io)