it's over
>>107845261the attacks are are a falseflag, the real spyware is in their newest update
oh so the iphone killing attack helicopter virus can only be fixed by....buying a new latest model iphoneok apple
>>107845049iTODDLERS BTFO
>>107847924baste
>>107845049kek I see this clickbait every few weeks it's meaningless fear mongering at this point
Jewgle added support for JXL now. Daiz on suicide watch as he's behind every shill post against JXLhttps://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7184969
>>107848864>reddit posts>gets triggered when daiz gets btfoi wouldn't be that surprised if you're really daiz.
>>107848858for anyone wondering, this is one of daiz's bots.noteworthy characteristics:- ssim.- ffmpeg. - non-existent sample size.- fake chart.- obsessed.- hates JXL.
>>107848839Now make its Android support on par with webp and maybe we can talk
>>107848897So has the dogshit decoding speed of JXL been i proved or not?
>>107848897Oh that explains it, i was gonna ask how did he manage to make JXL lose to webp in this benchmark when JXL destroyed webp every time i tried to benchmark them against each other in imagemagick
for what purpose?
>>107843062let me guess, yet another mediatek shitness?into the trash it goes preemptively
>>107843062are you afraid and shitting ur pants, Tim Crapple? are you afraid that zoomies want dumb phones now? are you afraid of the upcoming phone culture shift, Craig FEDerniggi?
>>107845482I miss my titan pocket fuckin shit
>>107843062I feel like this one is clearly a scam meant to capitalize on the Clicks Communicator hype. This product does not actually exist and never will.
All these fags making bimbo looking sex dolls into robots. But why not do what futurama did where its just a plain robot and then they overlay the identity overtop. Now granted we cant do that but with ar or vr goggles why not have a character model superimpose on a blank robot like joi and that hooker?Maybe add hair and clothing of similar mesh so u can twirl ur girls hair or w.e. but beyond that it doesnt even need eyes and shit. Its all presented in vr goggles. So question how long until a proto holodexk. Where i can create on demand a virtual 3d space like a white villa on a fruitger aero blue beach surrounded by ocean. With a cute emo blonde girl with eyeliner that then i can snuggle with, dance, pick up, and obv smash her puss. Like 2 to 3 years?
>>107848095what youre describing as true love is closer to the unconditional love of a parent, ie youre infantile.
>>107848299>Stop projecting a normal life onto others!sometimes i forget this board is 99% poorfag brown incels
>>107847836China will be the first to develop it in whatever form it takes. They have destroyed the male/female ratio with their one child policy.My best guess will be a robotic doll with basic movements that will will have textured hair/skin, but the rest of it will be covered in tracking marks of some kind.You'll wear AR glasses to what this scene in Blade Runner did with the hooker. And as long as it's a sane amount, men will pay. Because of us letting oligarchs take over, most of us can't afford a real woman.
>>107848058>you run from developing into a human being someone else should love.Have you actually dated in today's market? Every guy I know is decent, every chick wants to get smashed by Chad and Tyrone only, then lock in a beta at 30 to pay for her spawn.You're damned right I'm going to get a bot.
>>107848258Oh no, I and a lot of my male friends are done with women. We are on our way to becoming a single-gender species.
Vertical video is the norm now. All video is vertical now. People actively wish horizontal videos were vertical. They yearn for vertical video even when they're not circumstantially limited to it. A kid asked me to hold his phone and film him doing a trick at a skate park last week and when I held it in landscape mode he stopped me, took the phone, changed it to portrait and continued. Ten years ago vertical video was considered digital AIDS. It was to be avoided at all cost. Now it's the golden standard.
Yeah
>>107848840And that's a bad thing because?
My 8yo nephew told me he refuses to watch a video if it's not vertical. He never watched landscape footage in his life.
>>107848840>Ten years agoTen years ago people would watch videos on computer monitors and TVs instead of their phones because the phone screens were too small
NEWS>somebody submitted a huge PR to fix all the issues with 10.11 and it is being reviewed as of a few hours ago!https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/15986
Are there any alternatives to shim to use mpv? Two times out of 3 it crashes after opening it, if I'm using an external mpv install. Not to mention all the other issues it has
>>107828103>when it runs a full disk checkWhat the fuck is a "full disk check"? My sonarr doesn't have any tasks or anything named that
>>107848580The desktop Jellyfin client uses mpv
>>107848812Haven't used it in a while, but doesn't it have limited customization with mpv.conf and input.conf?
>>10784773213600k + 4070 + 32GB DDR5. I remember the UI being really unresponsive and freezing randomly. I'll reinstall it tonight and see if it's been fixed since.
>peak ai era>freetards still can't into usable documentation
idk Python's docs work just fine
why are boomers allowed to regulate computers
>>107831652SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>107831857A lot of those respondents won't be thinking about the prior conditions or second order consequences of those age verification checks. If you asked 'do you support age verification checks for ... if that involves companies and the government collecting data on everyone who accesses that content?' then a much lower percentage would support that.
>>107846339You just described the problem with democracy
>>107831645You see in 1984 and others where the protagonist is literally a janitor who loves the evil gov and strong leaders because democracy has weak leaders.
>>107831857It's sad - when you explain that this is exactly the playbook of every distopian government - they say you're overreacting. When you explain that supporting this is exactly like supporting Hitler in 1930s - they supported this. Ask them if they still agree - and they never talk to you again - but here we go. Schnell!
>he's still on DDR4 lolHow do you respond without sounding butthurt?
I have one PC with DDR4 and one with DDR5.The one with DDR4 is 64GB Quad and it's a beast.
>>107846159Mad? I'm enraged and about to demand my refund!
>>107846326Jannies to farm clicks
>>107846159I have a laptop with DDR5 and just upgraded to a laptop with DDR4.
>>107846159bitch pls I'm still on ddr3 and I still do more than you
>>107601582"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it."--George Orwell>CyberpunkThe FAQ: https://sizeof.cat/post/cyberpunk-faq/What is /cyb/erpunk?: https://pastebin.com/pmn9vzWZHow do I into /cyb/erpunk?: https://pastebin.com/5tpNFQdsHuge list of cyberpunk media: https://sizeof.cat/post/cyberpunk/The cyberdeck: https://pastebin.com/7fE4BVBgCyberlife: https://jinteki.industries/files/cyberlife.7zBibliothek: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/4m5hd2065hde8/Bibliothek>PrivacyTools: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/tools/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107847612>>107847520Not only that but even 15 years ago we were able to reconstruct faces from monkey brains. There are even results with decoding people's inner monologues and mental imagery as well.>>107847656google voice is free
>>107847667>There are even results with decoding people's inner monologuesI really truly hope not, thoughts are the last true private thing anyone has.
>>107847870https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/decoding-inner-speech-brain-signalsoh it's real alright but it's not coming to a town near you anytime soon so don't fret.
>>107847667>>107847656Most sites won't take voip numbers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN1DSo3bYWg>make joke in private snapchat messages>police show up to arrest you 1 hour laterlols
tfw on the losertube/schizo algo
>>107842216>logging in objectively downgrades your experienceI knew the jeets were incompetent but how is it this bad?
>>107838231i hope it dies outyoutube is brainrot slop
>not using dearrowngmi
>>107838231
How do you respond without getting mad?
>>107846803>are you planning to remove the entire network stack?If it's barebones, I don't see why we need a network stack unless it's needed.
>>107844625Wasn't that kache guy exposed for being an indian supremacist during Musk's Christmas 2024 breakdown?
>>107844625You say "good, then you don't need to care that they're using it"
>>107846315>no average person uses GNUPG or LUKSThe statement is not reliant on people using GNUPG or LUKS, but reasonable/should nbe used by the average person.
>>107844639facts
What is the deal with programmers coping that they won't be replaced by AIs
>>107848221wtf is not artistic about playing bass>t. triggered bass player
>>107845213you're not the first generation to think thatAI chess player blew the world away, flying cars and androids surely couldn't be far behind
Reading and math scores are still going down. Most people have trouble focusing and even thinking of questions to ask. Every other time someone talks about using AI its so they can be lazy and cut corners doing something.
>>107847763>saaar we programmers are special saaar don’t replace us
>>107845213This is easy to explain - here you have companies desperate to get software changes out, and not enough staff because hiring more staff would cut into profit levels. Sure, they would get the software completed - but the company isn't in the business of completing software - it's in the business of making profit.Come along a code-spewing technology that allows their current staff to go from completing 1 or 2 tickets a day - to 10.Massive. What do companies do? There's obviously fat to cut now, more profit to make by eliminating 10% of the programming staff.Do they hire new staff? No. Typically it was 1 new programmer every 5 years, turnover was 1 every 2 or 3 years.Now staff are completing their jobs faster, there's less stress, more satisfaction, company has more profit. Things are good for existing employees.For those employees cut - bad news. For new programmers entering the market - very bad news.As for an AI replacing people totally - probably won't happen, there will always be a person there to handle the code checks and ensure it's delivering code that is quality.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
This is a thread for all AI CLI related discussionClaude Code: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overviewGemini CLI: https://geminicli.com/OpenAI Codex: https://openai.com/codex/OpenCode: https://opencode.ai/New:>Anthropic Introduces Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work>https://x.com/claudeai/status/2010805682434666759>aka a gui for Claude Code
>>107848709ask it to output the seahorse emoji
>>107848733
Fucking trash arse whore.
>>107848760>it can't output emojiwhat the fuck is this shit
>>107848795Poogle, saars!
people are starting to forget that Windows actually was good a long time ago, it has been 13 long years
>>107820326>starting to forgetpeople on this board aren't even old enough to post here, they can't forget what they've never used
>>107846308People definitely did not like 10 at the start and only have done so recently as a cope for Windows 11.10 basically set the precedence for turning Windows into a service for Microsoft and shifted the revenue focus on not just the actual license sale but also data collection and ads.
>>107847702Yeah, I remember a lot of people being pissed about the spying and the seeming downgrade in UX/UI of 10 compared to 7.People wanted 10 to be a return to form after 8, but it had (and still has) this weird clunky issue with all the settings menus being tacked over control panel, device manager, etc. from 7. It just seemed ultimately pointless. Why use the new settings menus when they obfuscated things further, usually involved more clicks/menus to go through, and often times resulted in you needing to open up control panel or one of the old settings systems 7 already had, which worked fine and still worked fine in 10, in most cases better than whatever the fuck was going on with their new settings?I hoped they'd eventually just scrap it all and go back to control panel and the other device managers, but it never got fixed and the settings in 11 are even worse than 10.Also, updates being forced and breaking shit/resetting how you had things setup and organized display wise. Overall it felt like you had less ability to customize the overall look of your system, and what was the point of doing so if an update might mess it up anyway?A lot of people took the switch to Linux when 10 came around. Before that it was considered more "elitist", but now that's hardly the case, not that it necessarily was back then either. Back in the Windows 7 days I had an old USB that booted with Mint on it around that time which I used to circumvent all the browsing restrictions on my highschool's computers cause whoever set them up didn't disable boot from USB in startup settings kek. Fun times.
>>107821060All these fags that weren't alive back then I swear.Windows 3.xx was considered decent because that's all people really knew other than DOS back then. It did more than DOS and still allowed you to run your DOS shit without much trouble. So it wasn't outright hated.Windows 95 was shilled worldwide as revolutionary but was pretty hated due to constant BSoD problem. Win98 was the same but considered more tolerable because it had all the updates for Win95 bundled in (mostly USB support was all anyone cared about). The entire 9x series was considered horrible.Windows 2k was beloved because NT actually got decent by then. It still ran most of your Win 16/32-bit and DOS shit. Although, a lot of people (/v/ermin) cried about how it wouldn't run games despite never having used it.WinME was a huge joke and everyone thought it was shit. So many teenagers got stuck with shitty pre-builts when it came out. No idea why but at that time everyone was buying them for their children for the first time. No self respecting person wanted it. I made a lot of money installing Win2k for people back then.WinXP was considered a worse 2k and the GUI was laughed at by everyone. It didn't become tolerable until SP2 and most people only moved on from 2k because of Microsoft forcing people over. It also ate far more RAM and was never as stable.Vista was shit and widely hated like ME. Windows 7 was basically Vista with some bugs fixed so was in the same boat as 98. Most people preferred to stay on XP for good reasons.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107846210kek
