I'd be fine if they were trans, just don't be horrendously ugly. Fuck "man"/"sis"/whatever you "are", get some plastic surgery or whatever.

>>107587424
Of course it's totally responsible to want to know wtf happened in a case like this. A sane person wouldn't have done all of this in the first place. But lets assume something happened that required doing such a thing. In that case a sane person would have;
>Calmly explained the reason for the sudden changes
>Provided proof that no code had been modified
>Provided a way to verify they were the same person as the person that was running the other repo
>If they planned to drop the project they would have reached out to others that had contributed and offered them control over the repo before doing any of this (or as soon as possible if that wasn't something they could do)
>Would have encouraged someone to fork it from the last repo if they were not convinced and/or at least encouraged someone to continue working on this new repo and given them ownership

Instead we got....a sperg out.

I really really don't understand this modern batch of "FOSS lovers". When I was very active and releasing a lot of code from the mid-90s through the mid-2000s and still on the GPL kool-aid I would have never thought of doing something like that. I wanted my code to be used and I was happy for anyone to use it, contribute to it and didn't give any fucks if they forked it. Didn't matter if they called me mean names or not. I was just overjoyed that I had created something that hopefully improved the world and helped other people in some way. I didn't care what you used it for either. I didn't care about your race/religion/creed/whatever. As long as you weren't anti-free speech and free-use of software I didn't care. Most everything I created is now in the public domain. But if you want to place it under some other license I could give a shit about that too.

It's stupid. The drama we had was different back then. It was all just annoying licensing drama and autism fights about the best way to code something (and rarely what to code it in).

>>107587293
I agree with what you're saying, that last reply wasn't me.

>encoding scheme is just the in-memory representation
>there's more hate speech and political rhetoric than anything else in the readme
kek
ironic and worthless

>>107573105
Do better.

>>107587445
Yeah that's part of why I held off at first and now I see they are in stock and I saw prices are already going up and figure it will probably go up more.

>>107587357
Stock isn't too bad yet, might be able to wait a bit.

File: 1756469031448239.png (790 KB, 1750x1536)

790 KB PNG

>>107587357
why would you get a pi over an older x86 micro pc

>>107588424
Because I tend to use pi's portably in weird places or in cyberdecks and such and not plugged into a wall somewhere. If I were to do that I would just get get a modern mini PC with like an AI 370 in it or something, I don't need any of those though.

>>107588424
NTA but I use an old RPi that I use for PiHole and occasionally torrent seeding. I've thought about going that route and expanding what I use it for but I assume it'd be way more power draw when I can't really think of that much more to do with it.

>>107583544
Magnesium is actually lighter than alu. That's why it's used in expensive race car wheels.
It's also very reactive so it corrodes easily and doesn't take much to set on fire, which has caused some pretty horrible motorsports incidents. Thankfully Audeze (and ZMF, and Fostex, and anyone else who uses it on headphones) use an alloy and not its pure form, so you won't have to worry about getting incinerated because you set fire to your headphones.

>>107578539
>Steinberg IXO22
rebranded to Yamaha UR22MK3

>>107587793
There's also a cheaper version with only a single amplified microphone input called the IXO12/UR12MK3

Is it better to output sound from my PS3/PS4 to my DAC with optical audio or to just use HDMI and the headphone jack on my monitor? I've heard that HDMI has better quality but also that monitors are worse at converting digital to analog. I have a Fiio K7 which I mainly use for my PC and ps2 but I'd like to have all my devices going to a single jack.

File: ShamelessOrderlyElkhound-(...).gif (1008 KB, 500x365)

1008 KB GIF

>>107587585
>Just take it off and run it through your fingers. They made a youtube video about it.
Wouldn't that fuck up the tape? I know their pads have plastic rings on the outside but the tape won't stick as good after I pull the pad off, no?
>>107587625
Then I have no fucking idea how they manage to make all their headphones so awfully heavy. It's really just Audeze with the >600g headphones. The newer design LCD-5 uses is lighter but the carbon fiber headband is fucking awful for functionality.
>>107587978
K7 outputs up to 24bit 96khz via optical so it's beyond what you're capable of hearing already. If the audio implementation on the monitor is shitty(it most certainly is not great at least) you'll be better off using optical on your DAC anyway.

yeah test

>>107580776

>>107579010
Sex with Chrome-tan

File: 1764951321231983.png (392 KB, 720x897)

392 KB PNG

for me the captchs is always 4 dots, half shape, then for text its either upside down or random symbols. its never unique

Give me pedo proxy or give me death.

>>107587495
vga cable came loose

>>107588401
You look at food and see computers?

File: 1763541589313441.png (789 KB, 900x900)

789 KB PNG

>>107588422
>mcdonalds
>food

File: 1674447671775.jpg (34 KB, 440x440)

34 KB JPG

>>107588436
I retract my previous statement.

>>107586602
>If you don't have AI do you even exist or are just an hobbist unserious browser? That's survival, Firefox cannot afford to be percieved as a third class alternative that is not up to latest tech.
why? firefox in 2025 is used almost exclusively by people who interests and needs aren't alligned with the average users.
firefox is FACTUALLY hobbyist-tier software now, they should catter to their actual users instead of trying to appeal to people who don't care and will never make the switch.
>Crusty powerusers using vim since 1990 can be appeased with a big "Turn this shit OFF" button. They are not relevant 1% (vocal minority) of 1% (powerusers) of 1% (desktop market)
aka probably 90% firefox users, 9% clueless debian/ubuntu/mint users, 1% normies who somehow use it but aren't part of muh sekrit klub
>A CEO even the shittiest CEO in the world should aim to conquer the entire market.
why does mozilla need a fucking CEO? why is there a for-profit in the first place?
firefox is a non-profit, 5-engineer project, they just need part-time accounting and legals, no useless execs who drain the company dry because they live in the silicon fucking valley and want tim apple-level salaries.

this is crazy to me, firefox is by any metric left in the dust, there is NOT A SINGLE GOOD REASON to struggle to keep the status quo and beging google for money, they should fire every non-engineers and let the rest cook, that's what firefox users want, that's what mozilla the non-profit need, fuck the for-profit.
people/companies would give money to firefox if it wasn't mismanaged like it currently is, see the ladybug hype, money is pouring from everywhere, EXACTLY because it's not like chrome and its clone, trying to mimic the leading adware is a lost battle, people/companies want something else, not tied to google or mozilla, taht would fit into their opsec/float management system (mozilla had firefox esr but they don't really care about it anymore)

>>107588233
The reason is Firefox only exists so google claim they don't have the monopoly Microsoft tried to get with IE in the 90s. It's just a way to subvert anti-trust laws.

Well that and a way to constantly humiliate us people still using it and ensure we never get mad enough to finally build a new browser engine that isn't an adware, spyware ridden piece of shit.

>>107588315
>The reason is Firefox only exists so google claim they don't have the monopoly Microsoft tried to get with IE in the 90s. It's just a way to subvert anti-trust laws.
I wonder what will happen when mozilla is bankrupted (not if, when), alphabet absolutely needs to be split as soon as possible
>Well that and a way to constantly humiliate us people still using it and ensure we never get mad enough to finally build a new browser engine that isn't an adware, spyware ridden piece of shit.
I'm thinking of contributing to ladybug out of spite, I can write good C++, there should be something I can do so this

>>107585122
All AI shit can be extended with extensions.
There's a reason for their existence.

>>107585122
>is he right?
No. Freedom of choice is not the same as freedom of the dev team to maintain the code as they see fit. Especially for such legally dubious services as AI.
>Oh, your browser stole my intellectual property? here's a gigantic lawsuit.
If he cares about AI shit so much he can fork and do whatever he likes.

>>107588356
>Claude, provide a python script to encrypt and compress all the assets and scripts declared in the following headers.
>Write a corresponding C function in init.c to decrypt, decompress, and load the assets and scripts.

>>107588435
what kind of faggot uses AI to program

>>107588438
The kind who gets paid for deliverables, not by the hour.

>>107588446
you're in the wrong thread

File: 1765819723913839.mp4 (3.7 MB, 480x852)

3.7 MB MP4

>you're in the wrong thread

>>107588440
>>google image has gotten way better
you must be over 18 to post here

File: 1laura.png (3.01 MB, 1024x1024)

3.01 MB PNG

I've decided on this photographic image, it has plenty of camera noise JXL shills love to jerk about all the time.

File: out.webm (3.19 MB, 1280x512)

3.19 MB WEBM

Had to crop the comparison by 50% to maintain lossless in RGB VP9. Files and settings used will be included as well in case I fucked something up. All images scored SS2 80 and while not visually lossless, are still very high quality.

>80 = very high quality. Distortion not noticeable by an average observer in a side-by-side comparison at 1:1 from a normal viewing distance. This corresponds to the typical output of cjxl -d 1.5 / -q 85 or libjpeg-turbo 4:2:2 quality 85.

https://github.com/cloudinary/ssimulacra2


File size: 254 KB (~29% smaller than JPG)
https://files.catbox.moe/ptvr88.avif
--sharpyuv -s 6 -q 72 -d 10 -y 420 --cicp 1/13/1 -a tune=iq

File size: 284 KB (~20% smaller than JPG)
https://files.catbox.moe/isrw29.jxl
-q 91 -e 7 --override_bitdepth=10


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 4jpg.jpg (357 KB, 1024x1024)

357 KB JPG

Here's the bloated JPG.

File: no-good.webm (41 KB, 1056x720)

41 KB WEBM

The AVIF animations are going to be a headache if you want to really replace GIF desu. You can't just feed avifenc 420 Y4M files since the --sharpyuv preprocessing won't work and if you feed it 444 Y4M then it overrides -y 420. The only way that I think you export a high quality animation properly is if you screenshot individual video frames and splice them together later. However the only way to get 4:4:4 video from 4:2:0 video is if you zoom it to 50%.

File: 1740586324979241.png (1.66 MB, 1086x1586)

1.66 MB PNG

Does anyone know if grain synthesis is supported by avif hardware decoding? That should help deal with the hipster faggot grain thing.

>>107581756
I wait until my current saveslop folder hits 2000 files then I make a new one with some random keysmash name. Been doing this since 2008 and next to nothing is actually organized.

>>107585911
I'm not really a fan of AI tools, but I think it'd be the only option for mass image sorting on levels like ours. At this point I don't even want to throw folders into Visipics to look for duplicates because there's so fucking much shit to sort through.

everything on desktop.

When desktop gets full, I create a folder called "old" and put everything in it and then start accumulating on desktop again.

When i need something from the past I use file search or just explore my nested old directories until something jogs my memory as to how deep it should be.

>>107582624
Thank you based God.

>>107581756
I create new folders everynow and then just to dump the files I have scattered all over my desktop and name them after the current month-year. I then move them to another nameless folder also on my desktop where other subfolders named similarly reside.

>>107581287
Because an android tv box is cheaper than a thin client and you can control it with your smartphone.

having a controller with actual buttons is much better

What's the current state of chink ndroid boxes?
Do they have good AV1 support now?
Any upcoming chipset/models to look forward to?

>>107586670
>I knew people who used their Wii to watch Netflix right up until they discontinued it.
literally me

>>107587052
seconding this one

>>107586674
fpbp/thread

Even Hades never spoke against F-Droid

>>107586819
Exactly what I need to hear.

>>107587541
>>107587580
Is that true, Hades?

>>107586671
Bugged to hell.

>>107588086
It converts webp too

>>107588091
if XT ever dies I'll remember that then, but needing a keybind for something automatic in my current experience would still be a downgrade

am i meant to be filling out the captcha every single time i post?
like even if my posts are 5 minutes apart on the same board and same thread?

>>107588086
Why is webp being forced when no one likes them?

>>107588377
Browsers like forcing them because they have smaller filesizes and that means their browser will load quicker and "feel better" for people that don't notice the difference in image quality or image sharing problems.

>>107585416
> It looks like you may be using an ad blocker
WHOA!!!! Look at the CONFIDENCE assessment we have here from google, a $700+ Billion company
> it LOOKS LIKE
oh really? it LOOKS LIKE it?
> it looks like you MAY be
i MAY be? u tellin me i may, and i may NOT be using an ad blocker? and it only LOOKS like i MAY be using one? good LORD this is what i call military-grade A+ CONFIDENCE when it comes to threats and accusations

A lot of people are incapable of imagining that anything could be different outside their experience

Google anti adblock measures have doing partial rollouts for awhile now. Like Google will do some anti adblock rollout that will only target a few users then Google goes quiet and does more testing before another partial rollout

But average "power user" that knows how to click thing will constantly remind you that it works him

Just stop using Youtube altogether. There is absolutely nothing worth wasting time on.

File: medical industry gobohomo(...).png (375 KB, 1188x1325)

375 KB PNG

>>107586149
its the non threatening, woman friendly speech style that has pervaded our civilization

>>107585416
>allowlisted
what is this jeetspeak?