why is everything related to software architecture so fucking gay and niggerlicious?all this terms just sound the fucking same, monolit, layered, client-server, and everysingle video that i see on yt talking about this is either made by AI or by someonewho clearly doesn't how to program, all these fucking Product Managers fucking niggers.is all this shit actually used in "big tech" or any software company?, it just seems likea very boring way to spend a lot of time and money.idk man
>>107744359Lack of divine intellect.
>>107744359still in undergrad? everything you name-dropped is something any half-decent backend dev should already know. this is not even in the same domain as "product managers"
>>107744359>why is everything related to software architecture so fucking gay and niggerlicious?only way to get you to listen, frogposting faggot
>>107744359Software architects are essentially idea guys who are high on their own farts.
>client-server>gay and niggerlicious?
>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2026
>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2012>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2013>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2014>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2015>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2016>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2017>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2018>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2019>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2020>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2021>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2022>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2023>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2024>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2025>tfw you don't need to upgrade your PC in 2026
my laptop runs OSRS and that's all i need
>>107741387the GOAT
>>107725772>64 gb ram>4090 for msrp>7950x3ddon't need to upgrade for a long time
I'm less worried about upgrading and more about if something breaks and needs to be replaced.
>>107743604It may actually have been. Very few people know this, but CRTs actually enhance images fed into them through esoteric means. Or at least they used to, before the collapse of spiritual energies, and the fall of the world into corrupted sin.
>>107741315then why don't both of those look the same to me?
>>107743074:D.jpeg
>>107741289It's due to superior CRT technology and has nothing to do with growing up.
>>107741289pajeets.
Kek
>>107744276>even though it still uses Java (bleh).Isn't it Nekolin now?
>>107741454Pre-ordered this thing if I don´t forget I will make a thread when it arrives. Most likely in march.
>>107744782Actually looks like a neat idea. Sucks it's subpar for Android use.Looking forward to your thread.
>>107741454What's the problem?
>Read the sticky: >>105076684>GNU/Linux questions >>>/g/fglt>Windows questions >>>/g/fwt>PC building? >>>/g/pcbg>Programming questions >>>/g/dpt>Obsolete laptops >>/g/tpg>Cheap electronics >>>/g/csg>Server questions >>>/g/hsg>Buying headphones >>>/g/hpg>How to find/activate any version of Windows?https://rentry.org/installwindowsPrevious: >>107682448
>>107745089focus stealing prevention doesnt seem to fix that, sadly
>>107745089>100€ headphones with excellent audio quality and +10 year lifespan>That's awful value for money.
>>107743727You want to make a game engine without having ever made a game? That's a strange approach.
Whenever I start an audio or video file in Brave browser, the volume "ramps up" for the first second. How do I make it not do that?I have no such issue in foobar2000, VLC etc. so it's not a hardware issue.
>>107745792Solution was “Disable all enhancements.” under audio device properties. God I hate Windows so fucking much it's unreal. All I did was install the barebones drivers for the mobo sound card BUT OF COURSE.
are KOSS headphones any good? or are they influencer slop?
>>107743305>>107742489>>107734249>Le IEM~I swear that retarded IEM shit became the new ear fedora. THEY ARE JUST OVERPRICED EARBUDS
I have like 6 pairs of headphones, all recommended ones that sound "great". Half open ones, big ones, smaller ones (no in ear shit). The thing is, while they sound "good" literally all of them pierce my ears with sharp high frequencies. Even when I tested them in some Hifi shop on a thousands of $$$ preamp. I keep returning to the portas. Most people say they have muddy highs but apparently I'm over sensitive or some shit because while I DO hear what they mean it just sounds soft and comfortable to me. I can listen to them literally all day without getting tired while all others give me migraines sooner or later. They are light, do not fucking clamp my enormous head and the hair pulling shit is solved by >>107745070I have yet to find a pair of headphones that have similar "soft" highs and upper mids but apparently the average human nowadays is deaf and NEEEEEEEEDDS piercing highs to enjoy shit.
>>107734191I bought my first pair of Porta Pros circa 2008 and I usually keep a pair on hand in case I don't want to use my wireless earbuds during my workout sessions.
>>107745229Would you say their sound has changed since 2008? (I mean when you bought new ones recently)
>>107734191Yes it's slop. Stick with your Seinheisershit. Was going to buy SB40 but you fuckers cleaned everything before xmass.
>take CS class at uni (for fun, not my major)>this is what the other students are coding onAnd then you wonder why we need H1B indians
>>107742334> There's nothing wrong with the new generation of kids growing up on locked down toy appliances and never knowing what it's like to actually own and control your own property yeah the world is fucked. this picture nails it >>107731253Fuck that anons racism though
>>107742488Really cool site, but its making even my desktop fans start spinning fast when I try to run the desktop environment on the Arch image. Crazy that this is even possible, but its not gonna work on an IPad.
>>107742507>owning and controlling your property is lugging around 6 pounds of ewaste with 2 hours battery lifecollege isn’t a place to fiddle with your bashrc and audio drivers
The ifags are going wild in this thread dunking on lincucks, completely oblivious to the fact that productive members of society program on windows "gaming" laptops.>muh spyware muh recall muh performanceCope. I have a macbook and a linux NAS too, but windows has almost all modern and old software available, which makes development that mush easier
>>107745177Almost no programmer uses windows unless they absolutely have to, like being an azure buttslave. It’s a pile of shit OS that is by far the worst out of the big three, to such a point that microdick had to virtualize an entire fucking linux distro in WSL to make it even slightly usableYour gaming laptop is trash, your opinions are trash and you haven’t made a single cent as a programmer.For the record macbook pros are absurdly fucking good for dev work and the usual "choose your device" company tends to be at least 60% macbooks since m1 dropped
Anybody here try/use Bedrock linux?I've been on Manjaro for a while, but I'm getting the itch to switch distros.Debian's not at the top of my list, but I'd consider it. I refuse to ever use Ubuntu again. (There was some unpleasantness back around '08 and I refuse to ever give them another second of my time.) Nothing really against Mint. I've used it before, though, and it keeps me in the Debian branch, which I'm not very used to. CachyOS is, I guess, catching on for some reason. It's another Arch derivative. Can't be worse than Manjaro. And I'm somewhat used to the Arch ecosystem.But this Bedrock thing seems like a bit of a winner. Doesn't pin you down into any one branch. Plus, as I understand it, I can just install it over top of my existing install, instead of starting over from square one.Anyhoo, just wanted to know if anyone here has experience with it and would/wouldn't recommend giving it a try.>inb4 gentooNo.>inb4 just use ArchThen I might as well stay where I'm at, which I don't want to do.
>>107743567??? Where's the benchmarks faggot?
>>107744909idk.
>>107745074Tell me why the use of Linux namespaces in container runtimes is worse than this dogshit that Bedrock does. If you can't, your argument is null and you should just use Debian with podman.
>>107745183I'm not, like, asking your permission, or even for your blessing. I'm asking if anybody used this shit and if it's worth trying.Still, your recommendation is noted.
>>107743422I suggest NIGGIX.
It's 2026. How close are Waifu robots to becoming commercially available?The technology must be close by now, /g/ros...
>>107743447>To pick a robot on the shelf is to buy a slave. Yes. Fucking sold.>It's cannot be a waifu. Just an expensive prostitute. You don't own a prostitute, no more than the guy two hours ago did, or the next guy two hours from now.Now let me suggest a compromise: It doesn't need to be any different than your PC. You can build it from parts or buy it pre-assembled. But what you put on it is up to the user. You wanna use the paid cuck corpo software? Knock yourself out. Me, i'm gonna install a local model.
>>107731303>There is no good artificial skin either.It's very expensive, and not available widely or in large amounts (like a whole hand's worth). Only used for research purposes.
>>107731340If you're over the age of you 20 that's never gonna happen, teen love was real all along and you missed on it
>>107743341Not exactly but probably close enough practically-speaking.
>>107745646This is the brutal truth that the world doesn't want people to face.
Why do people bother with paid AI assistants like Grok, CoPilot, GPT, Gemini, and Claude, when this exists, it is FOSS, and it is currently beating out all the others in terms of raw reasoning power and token efficiency?Come in here and explain why you're a fucking retard still using Grok because you live your life out on twitter.
>>107741958Unless you do lossless encoding (Which no one does, specially YT), uploading at 60 FPS doesn't double your filesize, and if it's just a slideshow, it should be pretty close since you're gonna re-use pretty much the same macroblocks. What surprises me is that 4K isn't a premium feature, I feel that YT could save a lot of money if they only allowed monetized channels to upload 4K, and only YT premium subs to watch it. Realistically speaking, given that most people watch on mobile, you wouldn't really have that much backlash
>>107717251>slopwhy pick on just one. go look at some history shit. recommended videos show up, ai generated, crappy fiction represented as history which is fiction already. browse through shorts. mostly ai scammy videos, everything from paleontology to biology. all ai-genned bullshit. mega-tera gigs. also, look at these ads
>>107717251giving internet access to certain regions of the world was a mistake that we’ll come to regret
If I see AI in the thumbnail I hide it, simple as. I don't see it as often anymore. Ill give exception sometimes to videos from two years ago when it was a novelty
>>107717251this isn't even a drop in the bucket of worthless shit stored in the cloud
is there any point to messing around with my shell beyond just installing and switching to fish?
>>107741182Just use bash you fucking troon
>>107745500tried bash, no autocomplete no highlighting nothing works this fucking sucks
>>107745529Pretty much. Only reason to use bash interactively is for work or if you just hate yourself.
>>107743274Wrong. Builtin commands are created according to some kind of standard. You can't enforce the same standard on everyone who writes a case statement matching a string, nor should you.
>>107745426K. Enjoy staying dumb. Don't rtfm.
Every iPhone app to scan or find Bluetooth devices is just a long list of "unnamed" or otherwise unknown Bluetooth devices around me with no helpful info like Mac addresses. The whole point is for me to find out what all those unnamed and unknown devices are. I don't care about lost Bluetooth devices because I try not to have any of them.I hate Bluetooth and am trying to get rid of all Bluetooth devices in my vicinity. Is there a physical Bluetooth scanner device I could buy?
>>107745579>with no helpful info like Mac addresses.how's that helpful?stalker.not going to help you.mods, do something.
Do any of you use this? Is it usable in practice?
I also daily drive it on 4.3 rn but been using since 4.2 came outHaven't figured out how to use a dgpu to work so when I dualboot to linux mint when i want touse my 1060
Anyone else on the simplex server for qubes?
>>107738449>Is it usable in practice?I like the concept., buuuuuut...Last time I checked, it doesn't have sound, which makes this distro not suitable for gaming, video nor music. Has this changed?Probably good for making a turnkey system your grandma can use to browse the web and use email without breaking it.
>>107745270Pulseaudio is used as a server client model with dom0 being the server and the vms as the clientsThey do have a pipewire plug-in but it might not be default
>>107745270>Last time I checked, it doesn't have sound, which makes this distro not suitable for gaming, video nor music. Has this changed?you can configure PCI passthrough to gaym on Qubes. if you have another GPU you pass that to your gaming VM and you should get video out as well as HDMI audio (I think, not 100% sure).
No one cares? For decades this smooth presentation was the standard for live and taped television.
>>107745024I dunno you kinda talk like that faggot
>>107745111I don't know if I'd call that a "proper" deinterlacer but it's one of the most popular methods known as Yadif 2x.
To really do it "right" you'd need actually display it as simulated interlaced video instead of deinterlacing. This is possible with modern displays by putting black lines between every line of video, on alternate lines. This will cause a dimming effect, but modern displays have high enough brightness to compensate. My gut says you also need 120hz+ on the display and possibly BFI to do it "right". Or even use something like CRT-Beam-Simulator.
>>107745121The easiest source to find and compare today would be professional wrestling DVDs released in the era before HD. Then compare them to what is available on the Peacock archives. The DVDs preserve the original 480i 60 fields per second temporal quality. The Peacock version will be in 30 frames per second and although the image might be a little sharper, the loss of motion clarity makes it look less alive.
>>107744241>the majority of them have been converted to 60 fps via adding fake frames rather than using an original source.This. Same with old porn, it's always 30fps or ai upscaled and smoothed from 30fps instead of de-interlaced using 60i originals.
