nektos/act
selfhosted github actions
is this good?

>>107571842
don't understand why people use github actions instead of a dedicated ci/cd tool

>>107594668
BMW would like you inform you that your heated seat option subscription is about to expire.

>>107571842
>Not running your own CI/CD

peasants

>>107595100
Actions are free (or were free) if you had your own selfhosted runners, which are pretty easy to setup.
Does it really matter anyway? I certainly wouldn't use or trust GitHub anymore after this blunder.

>>107593536
You're going to keep waiting. Forever.
Being inflammatory usually makes people want to interact with you less, not more.
Ask Anon again after you've had a nap and calmed down.

>>107593550
i sure will lol, because you have no intention of actually demonstrating your claim and everyone knows it

>>107593039
Why are you coding are you a tinkertranny or something?

>>107593039
>Split problem into tiny bite size pieces
>Implement each piece at a time.
>Commit after each piece is done.
Now you have regular save points through out your development cycle. Why wouldn't I want that?
Also easily push to offsite repo for backup.

>>107593039
You need it for everything, even managing your dotfiles.

File: Screenshot 2025-12-18 at (...).png (311 KB, 484x378)

311 KB PNG

>>107595473
>>107595441

The link up we didn't know we needed

>>107595486
For winning at life, he surely looks depressed in all pics.

>>107595501
Some people just have neutral expressions like that

>>107595501
Because he's smart enough to know just how fucked we are.

>>107595441
Turkey, getting hair transplant work done

>>107590160
>why are you mad at me for doing the same thing you are doing? are you afraid of competition or something?

+1000 izzat

File: 1756042277215657.jpg (222 KB, 669x669)

222 KB JPG

>>107592633
Kek

>>107593251
new words keep being invented.

>>107595954
a small amount using the same building blocks of other words, same with images today

>>107590115
Is gayming really over? I'm not sure I can believe that but then again for the past few years games have been an unoptimised mess no one could play at a stable performance...

I can't wait to sell my rig for a charge dodger

>>107593749
3090, replace 1GB modules with 2GB GDDR6X modules, flash the vbios, and you now have 16GB more vram than a 5090. That’s what China’s been doing for a while and how they kept up in generative products despite the Blackwell ban

>>107593768
you will have to stream your games from a talmudic server instead of running them in your pc

>>107590115
Based nvidia

>>107595314
you bet, just like grocery and housing and healthcare prices went right back to normal.

>>107588160
It's dumb that everything that's in my interest seems to be against the interests of these giant tech companies.

>>107590264
I think we're in the denial stage.

>>107588160

year 2025 peak of current sun flare cyckle soon circuits might work again

oh shit it is over they're down -3% today

>>107594903
again, any faster and higher refresh rates become easier to read due to receiving too much information aka it helps your nonexistent retarded use case of reading text at super speed

>Software BFI doesn't get anywhere close
i watched a video of a crtroon saying it's basically the same so i don't care for your sour grapes

also i don't live in hyderabad so i can afford to make my room suitable for dark displays

>>107592762
This. It's currently the most rational decision to make.

>>107593657
>>107593706
Unintelligent anon
Enjoy your shitty gamma lowering as framerate tanks, also VRR add input latency
>>107592888
>awful tn with dead pixels and awful color accuracy
Stop being a masochist
>>107593643
You clearly have never played a VN or any 2D game

File: 1720653574474176.jpg (30 KB, 359x359)

30 KB JPG

just get one of the million used LCD shitpanels they are all the same
OLED is the only true improvement

>>107595043
>You clearly have never played a VN or any 2D game
Why would you need less resolution for a game where you read text?

thanks anons. will keep lurking untill the thread ends then go research next week.
keep it coming.
i'll be here for another hour.

>>107589619
>3rd gen celeron 2890
>normie friendly
Not happening. I had a similar situation this year, and the best I could do was Bodhi Linux. Config took all night, because it's the most user-unfriendly thing in the world. That being said, it still ran Chromium just fine, and the desktop can (after a monumental amount of work) be made to look a bit like 2000s macOS.
>i hate seeing saveabe machines even very buget ones go to waste.
Me too. I fix them and give them to my younger brother to play with. You will not, however, be able to realistically sell them. Moore's law puts hard limits on the working life of everything with a processor.
>is it possible to save the old girl?
Yes, but not as a general purpose computer. It should be repurposed for a more specialised task so you can minimise bloat. It could, for example, be used as a retro games console, or run a MARS engine for Core War competitions. Or you could do some IoT experiments and use your old laptop to get data from sensors around your house.
You could even use the very hardware constraints as an experiment in itself, by seeing how fast you can get it to run. You might even install Linux from scratch and try to design your own distro and upload it to GitHub/Gitlab. That kind of thing looks great on a resume, because it proves deep understanding of dependencies.
>what is the lowest cpu useage linix that is user frinedly with full gui support?
What exactly do you count as "full gui"? If you mean a full desktop environment that a normalfag can use after you configure it for them, then your options are very limited (Slackware, TinyCore, Bodhi, etc). If you're willing to use a more minimal interface, however, you have the option to experiment with more powerful distros and debloat them with simpler window manager.
As a wildcard, you might also experiment with installing Emacs without a GUI. Then you can play with all the different packages and amaze yourself with what is possible from a text-only interface.

>>107590055
that is not a "third gen celeren" (whatever that means) its a bay trail atom

I have a Celery 2840 puter seeding various Linux isos 24/7 running Windows 10.
It's able enough to do that, uses very little power, generates almost no heat whatsoever. I just gave it a shitty 128GB old SSD for the system and upgraded the RAM from 4 to 8.

>>107589619
ReactOS or Haiku

>>107579266
I don't know but the hard limit is 2007. By then Facebook had taken over the internet and popular old sites were starting to die off. It was also around then it started to become heavily commercialized, although that had been a big enough issue for a few years at that point.

>>107593432
Oh yes.

Never

>>107579266
when Star Wars Galaxies was in the Pre-CU phase.

>>107579266
1993, up to and including August.

>>107595984
proof btw
https://codeberg.org/librewolf/issues/issues/1978#issuecomment-2156134

>>107593827
>you get to virtue signal
I love virtue signalling! Is it rust and trans friendly btw?

>>107595984
Right, sure, now answer the actual question.

>>107596090
that is the answer. librefox cannot be trusted.

>>107587861
>usecases
See >>107596034
The usecase is avoiding Mozilla's general jewry.

>>107580756
Rustsisters... Not like this

>>107593094
Yes

>>107593835
damn it, i thought being a updooter here was good, time to become a lts guy

File: 1737262035537676.jpg (30 KB, 518x502)

30 KB JPG

>>107580864
>>107581029
>ironic, it save code from being unsafe but not himself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKqLhzHSARI

>>107580756
Unsafe

>>107595540
better QR see >>107595146 >>107595204 >>107595278

>>107595639
That shows why XT is better anon

File: Screenshot_20251203_23453(...).jpg (988 KB, 1920x1200)

988 KB JPG

>>107585359
4chanX and OneeChan is where its at.

File: file.png (52 KB, 443x581)

52 KB PNG

>>107595885
make sure to add this to 4chan X > advanced > custom css:

:root {
  color-scheme: dark;
}
.captcha-root > div {
  background-color: inherit!important;
  color: inherit!important;
}

It gives you properly styled captcha and dark mode scroll bars in the browser

I need this
https://github.com/TuxedoTako/4chan-xt/issues/208

>>107592710
Right, and none of this was ever my argument, or the argument of the other Anon who was talking about talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it. You're essentially arguing with yourself here, beating down a straw man that you have built for yourself.

>>107592828
>talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it
and you still can't do that
it's meaningless and unenforceable
you can only license YOUR CHANGES under GPL
you cannot "slap GPL" on BSD licensed code to which you do not own the copyright

>>107592883
>talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it
>it's meaningless and unenforceable
So long as the codebases remain identical or so long as you can't prove that the project contained GPL code that was distributed without source. But this was established already in >>107589905 so I don't know why you're still acting like I'm arguing against it. I'm not arguing about what's "meaningfully enforceable", I'm arguing about what's technically (il)legal. There could be even one line of GPL code in a project with thousands of lines of BSD code and if the binary for that project is ever distributed, the source code would still, *technically and legally*, have to be released. So, for the sake of argument, let's go with that.

>you can only license YOUR CHANGES under GPL
>you cannot "slap GPL" on BSD licensed code to which you do not own the copyright
When you create your project, you licence the entire project as a whole. You cannot say "this code only has 1 line of GPL, so I'll only release that one line, but not the 1000 other lines that were originally under BSD because BSD says I don't have to". No. If a project contains GPL, the entire codebase has to comply with the GPL. You cannot claim copyright over the original BSD code and you cannot remove the original BSD licence and copyright notice - that would violate the few terms that the BSD (2 or 3 clause) licence has - but you *can* very much take BSD licenced code and slap GPL code onto it *OR* slap code onto it that you never intend to release as source. You do not need explicit permission from the original copyright owner to do either of those things, or for the original copyright holder to relicence the code for you so you could use it in a GPL project. Literally the entire point.

File: eeepc.png (201 KB, 1024x600)

201 KB PNG

>>107589464
it's the single developer's playground
do not expect any kind of support during the process
>>107592006
hi

>>107575883
Genode is pretty good

>>107591411
I'm just dipping my toe in embedded too. Turns out /diy/ has dedicated threads to microcontroller stuff >>>/diy/2952647

My newfag retard questions are near the bottom.

>>107593507
CMSIS as specified by ARM only covers interaction with CPU. Although the ST's port has register maps and addresses for peripherals (these are used by HAL/LL).
ST ships HAL and LL in their Cube SDKs. LL take way more lightweight, sometimes it's easier to read/write than writing to registers.

As for setting up the project, it's just regular C project, really. Most of it is included in the Cube SDKs - startup files and linker script. And it gives you a compiler flags.
Let CubeMX generate the project and see what's in it for yourself, not that hard to understand.
There will be linker script, assembly startup file, C startup file, main with some hw init routines, file with interrupt handlers, hal config header, and incomplete copy of CMSIS/HAL. And some eclipse project settings.
Check the repos on their github, e.g. https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeH7
you can find everything there as well, just copied out.

>>107593615
I doubt many new products are being made using 6502. And even if they were, 6502 should only ever be programmed if you absolutely need to. Its a form of self flagellation, not something that is actually healthy for the body or mind.

>>107593682
>I doubt many new products are being made using 6502.
Most are probably in existing product lines that require safety and certification. After 40+ years it is considered well tested and proven.
https://www.westerndesigncenter.com/
>Annual volumes in the hundreds (100's) of millions of units keep adding in a significant way to the estimated shipped volumes of five (5) to ten (10) billion units. With 200MHz+ 8-bit W65C02S and 100MHz+ 8/16-bit W65C816S processors coming on line in ASIC and FPGA forms, we see these annual volumes continuing for a long, long time.
>The 6502 is likely the only processor family that has remained loyal to its ISA over the last 45 years. In addition it has served the widest spectrum of electronic markets through those years. For example, it has served and in some cases created markets for the PC, video game, toy, communication, industrial control, automotive, life support embedded in the human body medical devices, outside the body medical systems, engineering education systems, hobby systems, and you name it electronic market segments. I might add the 6502 has served in a highly reliable and successful way!
>As added food for thought, the 6502/65816 microprocessors protect millions of lives annually within embedded heart defibrillation and pacing systems.

I did embedded assembly programming for a living and I'd chose 6502 any day over Intel stuff.

>>107591411
Get pozzed

>>107594499
>making a product better and doing sketchy monopolistic behaviour that fucks up the whole market is the same thing
kys

>>107592226
you are very low iq and don't understand technology at all.

>>107595740
>improving performance of a game is bad because my preferred corporation isn't winning
k

>>107595992
>improving performance of a game
why are you talking as if that performance improvement is generalized and not only targetting *your preferred corporation*?
>i like to see my preferred corporation "win" while us as consumers lose
you are beyond retardation, why do you enjoy sucking on a billionaire's cock so much?

>>107596042
Is it really too much to ask to have nu4chan users actually read and comprehend what they're responding to instead of posting some vitriolic bullshit that outs them as having no clue what they're responding to?