Since the other thread ( >>449649 ) reached the image limit, let's start a new oneI generated these last night, first time I've tried to make photorealistic imagesPretty satisfied with the results, even though you can still see some minor anatomy issues if you look in detailI used this : https://replicate.com/black-forest-labs/flux-dev?prediction=dp0wbxy1esrm40ch3z6tby9z34
>>456648This one is almost flawless, only the left shin angle betrays it
>>456648>>456649Also, I didn't edit them, this is how I got them to be generated (used prompts like amateur film photograph, lomography style)
This is the graphic design board not tell a computer what to do.
>>456652Didn't seem to bother in the other threadAlso, this is kind of part of graphic design now too
Well I didn't make it. The computer did. So there's that.
>>456658Added noise to make it more photoreal, helps a bit
>>456650>>456649>>456648flawed, but interesting
>>456648oh fuck offthis has absolutely nothing to do with design
>>456674Stay madIsn't it a built in feature in Photoshop now ?
>>456674>>456678they probably built it into bricks and dildoes at this point.ive never used it, for anything. friend tried some ai to get a higher resoultion image for me. i found the result more or less unsuccessful.there was some reddit poster who made a whole ai graphic novel. that was kinda interesting.i like catching the ai fakes tho - ai is still pretty dumb.
>>456679I guess it can get very useful to a lot of profesional / amateur content creator-ish peopleThough, for image generation, I don't feel like it's an absolute revolutionExcept perhaps for disinformation
>>456682it's pretty revolutionary as it is. just wait a few generations, and it'll really start showing its strengths
>>456684im not sure that image is a case for revolutionaryare you deep faking your teacher?
>>456678>Isn't it a built in feature in Photoshop now ?gosh I'm sure this totally isn't just a retarded crossboarderseriously, kill yourself
I want to get back into this, where do I go for the threads? Do people still use Bing or did they change to something else? Here's my contribution.
>>456922Check >>>/trash/, no joke
>>456922>>>/tg/93892311 #>>>/g/102347666 #>>>/co/145432496 #>>>/aco/8500973 #>>>/vp/56427886 #>>>/bant/21218349 #>>>/cm/3913986 #>>>/r9k/78788524 #>>456648 #
>>456648how do you guys get anything other than slop out of them?
>>456648
IMO this is my most realistic gen so far.It's SDXL based (I think Flux is still too plastic looking) using some analog photo loras and a custom ckp merged from a bunch of amateur style ckps.
Looks cool!
