Ancient Egyptians were White, and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
>>17280281Schizo
>>17280281>We were kings, and stuffThe Egyptians were Afroasiatic-speaking Africans whose linguistic roots laid in the Levant (Afroasiatic Urheimat) and genetic roots were a mix of Levantine/African.
>>17280305Pic related
>>17280281>Nords are so great we used to be Egyptians and Romans and Chinese and Jews and Native Americans>Why don't any of those people look Nordic today?>They were conquered by non-whites and bred out of existenceThat's far more humiliating, to be not just conquered but bred out of existence by your cultural and genetic lessers.
>>17280330strawmanthey were whites and whites are a diverse people
AYO SIEG HEIL
>>17280336Literal bot
>>17280352>copepic related is a literal bot laughing at you
>>1728028199% accurate, Catraoh also instructed the Egyptians to partially castrate (circumcise) so that they could be easily distinguished from the Egyptians.
>>17280336So which of those is modern Egyptians?
>>17280281
>>17280387what makes you think that after importing negro slaves for six thousand years or more that the population of egypt today is anything like what it was originally?
>>17280416The fact that they mostly carry native Y- and mtDNA or the fact that the few published samples are genetically rather close to modern Egyptians.
>>17280420some indigenous north africans retain their whiteness to some degree, but most have lost it completely. north african people are not uniformly brown, black, or white anymore and the religious taboos against mixing white with non white have been destroyed to break open the gates of heaven for the demons to rampage unfettered
>>17280428They are now mixed beyond help with asiatic hordes and bantus
>>17280281basado, the anti-aryan schizo will seethe endlessly in this thread, for hours and days
>>17280281Regular reminder that the picture on the right is from an advertisement for an online casino game and anyone who tells you they saw it in a school textbook is lying to you.
>>17280438I prefer this one anyway
>>17280281We now know that the oldest royalty eilites that built Egypt was definitely White with R1b* Steppe paternal genes and blonde hair.But almost certainly the peasants especially in upper Egypt were non-whites who likely did all the hard labour.
>>17280428>some indigenous north africans retain their whiteness to some degree, but most have lost it completely. north african people are not uniformly brown, black, or white anymore and the religious taboos against mixing white with non white have been destroyed to break open the gates of heaven for the demons to rampage unfetteredthat's a cherrypicked image, berbers are on average brown as fuck, since ancient berbers were also brown as fuck
>>17280452that's not a real article, it's a claim from a blog and the bbc never said anything even remotely similar, this "crhstians for truth" blogpage is the sourcehttps://christiansfortruth.com/bbc-documentary-reveals-king-tuts-great-grandmother-tjuyu-had-blonde-hair/
>>17280428ancient berbers were of the brown mulattos, genetically closer to eritreans than to people from swedenDistance to: CanaryIslands_Guanche.SG0.21722495 Eritrean0.22121166 Saho_Eritrean0.22493952 Ethiopian_Tigray0.23160092 Ethiopian_Afar0.23230692 BelgianC0.23274468 Swiss_German0.23316491 French_Paris0.23318755 French_Alsace0.23444958 French_Nord0.23602485 French_Pas-de-Calais0.23661160 BelgianB0.24085053 BelgianA0.24442981 French_Seine-Maritime0.24564211 French_Brittany
>>17280310true, this is close to the truth
>>17280477Nice picture of a rampaging demon horde like I referred to.
>>17280500average non cherrypicked berbers indeed, also ancient berbers were brown and not white
This thread already happened and it was already proved that Egyptians they were brown.>>17277053
>>17280503You are like someone who claims that Detroit today has the same demographics as Detroit 100 years ago based on the picture he found of a negro in Detroit from 100 years ago. Cherry picked to justify your agenda.
>>17280481That is clearly a real article as you just liked it? Are you now gonna spout some impotent racism because you don't like a Christian site qouting a BBC interview?Here's some brown people authors saying the same thing:>Saleem, Sahar N.; Hawass, Zahi (February 2015). "Subcutaneous Packing in Royal Egyptian Mummies Dated From 18th to 20th Dynasties". Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 39 (3): 301–306. doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000205. PMID 25695867. S2CID 26076919.>Hawass, Zahi; Saleem, Sahar N. (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press. pp. 71–74. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0.It is beyond dispute today that the original Ancient Egyptians had 0% black SSA DNA while modern Egyptians have ~10% black SSA DNA due to the Islamic slave trade. The people in Egypt only look brown today because of this. Even in medieval times they looked white (but not like Europeans).
>>17280513They couldn't be brown because browns/Asiatics are the racial enemies of Egyptians. >>17280443
>>17280514>You are like someone who claims that Detroit today has the same demographics as Detroit 100 years ago based on the picture he found of a negro in Detroit from 100 years ago. Cherry picked to justify your agenda.no actually i'm not, ancient berbers were proven to be quadroons, these guanche samples were taken from confirmed guanche remains, they were brown, whining won't change reality
>>17280521>ancient berbers were proven to be quadroonsin other words you found an old picture of a brown person so you spuriously now claim all of them were brown dubiously refusing to acknowledge that...>>17280416>what makes you think that after importing negro slaves for six thousand years or more that the population of egypt today is anything like what it was originally?
>>17280517>That is clearly a real article as you just liked it?no, it's a blog called christians for truth, not an article> Are you now gonna spout some impotent racism because you don't like a Christian site qouting a BBC interview?the bbc never said anything like that>It is beyond dispute today that the original Ancient Egyptians had 0% black SSA DNA while modern Egyptians have ~10% black SSA DNA due to the Islamic slave trade. The people in Egypt only look brown today because of this. Even in medieval times they looked white (but not like Europeans).i think you should take a look at that admixture chart more, the ancient egyptians were mostly natufians and resemble bedouins genetically and not europeans, pic rel is from the same studyalso they had deeper african ancestry, according to the study that you linked>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations
>>17280519>browns/Asiatics are the racial enemies of EgyptiansNope. The DNA evidence proves they were brown.
>>17280524>in other words you found an old picture of a brown person so you spuriously now claim all of them were brown nope, those are confirmed ancient berber samples and they're not white, your whining won't change that>dubiously refusing to acknowledge that...yes the salve trade added additional african genetics, but the ancient berbers were already not white, don't repeat it anymore
>>17280519they were brown in dna, and that doesn't prove that "brown"(not even mentioned as a term, just asiatics aka middle easterns) were the "racial" enemies of egyptians, but just enemies
>>17280528>no, it's a blogAll *.com "articles" are blogs to me. To academics only journal papers are "articles".Therefore your layman use of the word "blog" as opposed to "article" is clearly the political motivation of a wuickly dying ideology which does not change the objective facts talked about in the original _article_.>the bbc never said anything like thatCan you prove that this documentary doesn't exist? I don't consider either to be "authoritative" relative to the actual qouted experts and authors of the study.>i think you should take a look at that admixture chart more, the ancient egyptians were mostly natufians and resemble bedouins genetically and not europeans, pic rel is from the same studyYes, and? Are you so uneducated that you think Natufians have anything to do with black Africans?This discussion is way over your head lmao. The original Bedouins are also West Eurasian DNA, mostly descended from Natufians, mixed with influx from picrel. They were not brown skinned before the Islamic slave trade imported black Africans.>Ancient DNA analysis of Natufian skeletal remains found that the Natufian ancestry could be modelled as a mix of about 50% Basal Eurasian ancestry, and 50% from a West-Eurasian Unknown Hunter Gatherer (UHG) population, which was related to European Western Hunter-Gatherers.[24]
>>17280570>All *.com "articles" are blogs to me. To academics only journal papers are "articles".that's not how it works, that "christians for truth" is a blog>Therefore your layman use of the word "blog" as opposed to "article" is clearly the political motivation of a wuickly dying ideology which does not change the objective facts talked about in the original _article_.no actually, the bbc never said that, that's why you can't find such "original article">Can you prove that this documentary doesn't exist?you have to prove that the documentary says something like that in the first place (it doesn't)>I don't consider either to be "authoritative" relative to the actual qouted experts and authors of the study.there's no study on tut's grandmother>Yes, and? Are you so uneducated that you think Natufians have anything to do with black Africans?no obviously but they were not white>This discussion is way over your head lmao. The original Bedouins are also West Eurasian DNA, mostly descended from Natufians, mixed with influx from picrel. they resemble MODERN bedouins and MODERN saudis>They were not brown skinned before the Islamic slave trade imported black Africans.they absolutely were, this other article you're posting is a completely different population (not egyptians) that was predicted to have a few blue eyed people among them, you're mixing things up because you lost the argument about egyptians
>>17280570them being not white doesn't mean they were "black"
>>17280606>that's not how it works,Yes it is.>>17280606>bbc never said thatSo? The ariticle didn't claim BBC said anything, they were quoting an interview by someone not affiliated with the BBC. The BBC itself is not an authority on anything, especially not in current Zeitgeist.If you don't get this by now I think you might actually be retarded.>you have to prove Wrong, I posted sources, you failed to disprove them. Your personal opinion on the matter is irrelevant.>there's no study on tut's grandmotherI literally just posted two papers.>no obviouslyThank you for your concession.>they resemble MODERN bedouins and MODERN saudisYes, and? Do you understand how mutting works? Modern Saudis have ~10% black SSA like Egyptians too. But the other 90% of their ancestry is not black African, but from the West Eurasian basal pool.Black African Americans are also part European, but don't look anything like it since there are mostly no matching alleles in the progeny of mixed race couples, who do not share the same genes. The same is true of MENA, the brown skin, coily hair and dysgenic phenotype is due to misaligned chromosomes.
>>17280534You lost, and I will repeat it as many times as I like. I hope you get paid by the post to push your brown arabist agenda.
>>17280626It does. All West Eurasians had SLC24A5 in the neolithic. Those people looked like picrel. This is your "dark hair, dark eyes". The closest living people that look like picrel are modern Sardinians.The dysgenic phenotype found in MENA is due to African admixture, there is no such thing as "brown skin" as there is no gene for it; brown skin phenotypes are due to misaligned chromosomes which functionally turns SLC24A5 into an introgene because there is no matching allele in the SSA genome resulting in an analogue dysfunctionality which binds too tightly on the ribosome suppressing its production.
>>17280649>Yes it isno, it's not>So? The ariticle didn't claim BBC said anything, they were quoting an interview by someone not affiliated with the BBC. The BBC itself is not an authority on anything, especially not in current Zeitgeist.no they were not, they tried to assume something the bbc never said, this is why the original article from the bbc claiming that never existed>Wrong, I posted sources, you failed to disprove them. Your personal opinion on the matter is irrelevant.you didn't post any sources for this claim >>17280452 except this "christian for truth" bs>I literally just posted two papers.they're not papers on tut's grandmother, this paper >>17280517 proves that ancient egyptians were similar to modern middle easterners, this pca is from the same paper >>17280528 they plot with middle easterners, and the paper also says they were also part african on a deeper level, quote from the paper>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populationshere an admix chart from the same paper too >>17280606 showing they're basically modeled as modern saudis and not europeans, which shows they were not european>Thank you for your concession.i never claimed that they were black, simply that they were brown and i was proven right>Yes, and? Do you understand how mutting works? Modern Saudis have ~10% black SSA like Egyptians too. But the other 90% of their ancestry is not black African, but from the West Eurasian basal pool.the other ancestry is not white, and bedouinB and saudis are modeled with little to no additional sub saharan ancestry >>17280606 just like the egyptians and they're not considered whitethe other article you posted, this one >>17280570 is about chalcolithic samples NOT from egypt that have a few blue eyes (they were largely brown too)
>>17280653>You losti won actually, YOU lost, repeating a bunch of bullshit a billion times won't make it real, sorry, they were brown, look where the confirmed guanche samples plot >>17280521> I hope you get paid by the post to push your brown arabist agenda.nothing arabist about objectively looking at those confirmed ancient berber samples and concluding that they were quadroons
>>17280668>It does.it doesn't>All West Eurasians had SLC24A5 in the neolithic.completely false and the natufians are not even a neolithic population. plenty of ancient west eurasian populations have low rates of SLC24A5 (as much as modern menas or less)> Those people looked like picrel. they didn't, that's just your opinion>The dysgenic phenotype found in MENA is due to African admixture, there is no such thing as "brown skin" as there is no gene for it; brown skin phenotypes are due to misaligned chromosomes which functionally turns SLC24A5 into an introgene because there is no matching allele in the SSA genome resulting in an analogue dysfunctionality which binds too tightly on the ribosome suppressing its production.this is complete bullshit and not real
>>17280671I'll make this simpler for your dumb grifter brain>African =/= "black SSA">Ancient MENA = Zero nigger DNA>Modern MENA = Some nigger DNA, but mostly Ancient MENA DNAGet it yet? Or do you need set theory notation?>they were not europeanI never once said they were European. Learn to fucking read. >>17280517>but not like Europeans>not like Europeans>not...EuropeansFor you ESL dumbfucks "not" means that what follows negative clause. As we said several posts ago you are far too stupid for this conversation.
>>17280400What has happened in Europe in last 500 years?
>>17280668>All West Eurasians had SLC24A5 in the neolithicsource?>Those people looked like picrelsource?
>>17280677You will never be able to get around the fact that brown people (Asiatics) are the racial enemies of the Egyptians >>17280443 no matter how many cherry picked samples you post.
>>17280703According to Egyptians themselves they were browner than asiatics, retard.
>>17280697>African =/= "black SSA">le afrocentriiiismancient egyptians were brown, quit shitting yourself, no one mentioned black people>Ancient MENA = Zero nigger DNAwrong, quote from the study you linked:>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populationsyes it's genetic african ancestry proxied by the study with modern sub saharan btw> but mostly Ancient MENA DNAwhich means that the ancient egyptians were brown and not european>I never once said they were European.thank you for your concession, so they were not european AND they were not white>As we said several posts ago you are far too stupid for this conversation.no you are too stupid for this conversation, look at this admixture chart >>17280606 they're modeled exactly like the modern saudis
>>17280703>You will never be able to get around the fact that brown people (Asiatics) are the racial enemies of the Egyptians >>17280443that quote never mentioned brown people or race, "asiatics" aka middle easterners were enemies in the same way a middle eastern country is enemy with another middle eastern coutnry
>>17280706this is a meme depiction from a book from the 1900s, ancient egyptian "libyans" were not related to berbers from morocco and algeria and they looked like brown people
>>17280703>>17280706>>17280710>Afro-ASIATIC language familyDumb /pol/mutts. Ancient Egyptian is literally related to Semitic languages.
>>17280706Your mistake was that you failed to differentiate between the bloodline of the Gods, the ruling white elite, and the slave/servant brown/black massed of common people. You lose every time because you are in denial about your place in the spiritual hierarchy set established upon the earth by God.
>>17280713>>17280706other real depictions of ancient egyptian libyans, they were dark people
>>17280716>>17280706>>17280713more depictions of ancient egyptian libyans, the modern descendants of ancient egyptian libyans are the modern western egyptians
>>17280713>Egyptian to compare
>>17280706also yes these >>17280718 are ancient western egyptian "libyans" according to the same mid 1800s book you posted
>>17280724>no Egyptian to compareFix'd
>>17280724why did you post that image from a book while using modern moroccans when the descendants of those people are the modern western egyptians and they looked like this >>17280718 >>17280716 >>17280713you have your own ancient depictions from your own countries like pic rel
>>17280715There were 30+ dynasties. The early ones were brown native Egyptian, some were black, some later ones were asiatic (Hyksos) and they probably were the whitest, but still brown.Whites were incompetent low iq subhumans at that time
>>17280715Why are you posting AI pictures. You look retarded
>>17280281>Greeks were NOT WhiteThe Ancient Egyptians were Semitic Levantine, the people closest to them are the Semitic Yemeni Socotri /Jew. Even the Greeks were Semitic but when will the Euro fags admit it.
ancient libyans were swarths according to the ancients>The Sons of Boreas pursued the Harpies to the lands of the Massagetae and of the proud Half-Dog men, of the Underground-folk and of the feeble Pygmies; and to the tribes of the boundless Black-skins and the Libyans. Huge Earth bare these to Epaphus -- soothsaying people, knowing seercraft by the will of Zeus the lord of oracles, but deceivers, to the end that men whose thought passes their utterance might be subject to the gods and suffer harm -- Aethiopians and Libyans and mare-milking Scythians. For verily Epaphus was the child of the almighty Son of Cronos, and from him sprang the dark Libyans, and high-souled Aethiopians, and the Underground-folk and feeble Pygmies. All these are the offspring of the lord, the Loud-thundererHesiod>The Ethiopians above Egypt and the Arabians had Arsames for commander, while the Ethiopians of the east (for there were two kinds of them in the army) served with the Indians; they were not different in appearance from the others, only in speech and hair: the Ethiopians from the east are straight-haired, but the ones from Libya have the woolliest hair of all men. Herodotus>Sailing thence we came to the Lixus, a great river flowing from Libya. By it a wandering people, the Lixitas, were pasturing their flocks; with whom we remained some time, becoming friends. Above these folk lived unfriendly Æthiopians, dwelling in a land full of wild beasts, and shut off by great mountains, from which they say the Lixus flows, and on the mountains live men of various shapes, cave-dwellers, who, so the Lixitæ say, are fleeter of foot than horses. Hanno The Explorer
>>17280707Look at the chart, very slowly this time, don't stretch you overworked cognitive capacity.Now, to simplify:1. Red = nigger2. Look at Ancient Egypt. No red = no nigger3. Look at Natufian. No red = no nigger4. Look at Bedouin B. No red = no nigger5. Look at Modern Egypt. Some red = some nigger = brown/shitskin[HARD PART INCOMING]6. Now look at Bedouin A. Some red = some nigger = brown/shitskin7. Look at nafris. Some red.8. Look at Levantines. Some samples zero red = healthy phenotypes still seen today. Most samples some red = part nigger.You are trying to say modern dysgenic browns are related to Ancient Egypts. We're saying YES, obviously, in the same way that African Americans are related to Europeans. But African Europeans are not White just because they have White ancestors. Medieval Whites are not brown just because some mixed descendents are brown-black. Ancient Egyptians are not brown just because some mixed descendents are brown-black.If you really need a fucking pie chart I will make one for you.
>>17280713Interesting that Egyptians also show Sumerians to have blue eyes here.
>>17280742You will never be blood of the gods for whom the son of the God of gods was crucified. The resurrection of his flesh has transpired and we/he are ascended.
>>17280754the greeks weren't semitic because they didn't speak a semitic language, but they certainly were not north-euro tier whites, probably even less white than modern southern euros
>>17280754Hellenic languages are not Semitic
>>17280758>Look at the chart, very slowly this time, don't stretch you overworked cognitive capacity.you are retarded, YOU should look at the chart, the lack of additional recent sub saharan genetics does not make someone white, egyptians were brown like the modern saudinice cherrypicked picture you got there, people like this aren't white:Distance to: Egypt_Ancient0.03704220 Egyptian_Copt0.04608073 Saudi_Mecca0.04873842 Yemenite_Dhamar0.05017634 Yemenite_Amran0.05215495 Yemenite_Ma'rib0.05498462 Yemenite_Jew0.05746620 Yemenite_Al_Bayda0.05851735 BedouinA0.05852451 Saudi_Jizan0.05912236 Yemenite_Al_Jawf0.05931236 Yemenite_Ibb0.06003448 SaudiB0.06047588 SaudiA0.06265304 Saudi_Najd0.06340199 Palestinian0.06392276 BedouinB0.06648052 Samaritan0.06704658 Yemenite_Hadramaut0.06850964 Jordanian0.06961697 Saudi0.07010126 Yemenite_Mahra0.07083196 EgyptianA>You are trying to say modern dysgenic browns are related to Ancient Egyptsyes>We're saying YES, obviously, in the same way that African Americans are related to Europeans.apples and oranges comparison, african americans are largely related to sub saharan africans and look like them likewise the ancient egyptians looked like the people they share 95% of their ancestry with like saudis>Medieval Whites are not brown correct>Ancient Egyptians are not brownincorrect, they were
>>17280763>>17280768>The foundersSemitic Jews speaking Indo-European Yiddish.
>>17280281Lol this is mental illness cope. Pigskins weren't kangz in Egypt they were killed or captives, and negatively represented since the beginning. Egyptians had Indo European concubines for centuries.
>>17280757Yes and Egyptians were arab/pajeet tier brownoids>Those whose skin is too dark are cowardly: witness Egyptians and the Ethiopians. Those whose skin is too light are equally cowardly: witness women. The skin colour typical of the courageous should be halfway between the twoAristostle >So much for the formation of the hair; we should now pass on to the features of all the incidental features of the mixtures, as regards the differences of hair according to age, place, and nature of the body. The hair of Egyptians, Arabs, Indians, and of general all peoples who inhabit hot, dry places, has poor growth and is black, dry, curly and brittle. That of the inhabitants of cold, wet places, conversely - Illyrians, Germans, Dalmatians, Sauromatians, and the Scythian types of people in general- has reasonably good growth and is thin, straight, and red. Those who live in some well-balanced land which is between these in quality have hair with extremely good growth, which is strong, fairly black, moderately thick, and neither completely curly nor completely straight. The differences due to age are analogous to these: with regard to the qualities of strength, thickness, size, and colour, infants’ hair is similar to the Germans’, hair in the prime of life to the Ethiopians’, and that of ephebes and children to the hair of people of well-balanced lands.Galen
>>17280758You have no idea how to read the chart. I don't know how you "people" can directly look at data and then just lie about it when all of us can see it right there.
>>17280742I've seen Nefertiti's bust in real life and it's much, much whiter than the pictures on the internet which are always intentionally shaded.
>>17280783She is not whiter than Sicilians
>>17280790>mutt still in denial about white people getting sun tans
>>17280774>>17280781You are coping hard because you are finally realising we're right lol.So to summarise:>Zero nigger in Ancients>Some nigger in modern Egyptians AND in Saudis = brownsKeep comparing part niggers to part niggers and pretend as if that means something though, lmfao.Do you need the pie chart.
>>17280796>You are coping hard because you are finally realising we're right lol.No retard, the ancient Egyptians have the same DNA as brown people. They have no white DNA at all.
>>17280795They are deep denial about it. They know nothing about genes which is probably for the best given their depressingly mutted state.There is literally no such thing as a "brown gene". It's their whole phenotype that's dysgenic with African features like coily hair.Btw picrel is what the original J* haplotype warrior race paternal ancestry of MENA looked like. Muhammad was a ginger.Modern MENAmutts with African admixture look completely different even relative to early medieval Arabs.
>>17280809>There is literally no such thing as a "brown gene"You have literally no idea what you're talking about
>>17280796>You are coping hard because you are finally realising we're right lol.i'm only one of those posters, and i'm not coping, also there's no "we", it's just you>Zero nigger in Ancientssigh>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations>Some nigger in modern Egyptians AND in Saudis = browns>Keep comparing part niggers to part niggers and pretend as if that means something though, lmfao.you lost retard, egyptians don't resemble europeans but they resemble modern middle easterners and they were brown, 99% brown + 1% black doesn't make the preceding population white, they were brown like modern bedouins and saudis, like any other middle easterners
>>17280809I cosign this post. Thanks for bringing rational sanity to this crazy board.
>>17280813Which gene produces brown skin then? Go ahead, post it. Show me a gene unique to sandniggers that gives them shitskin.There is no such thing, they just have black skin genes mixed with dysfunctional alleles for white skin SLC24A5 on a suppressed chromosome.
>>17280809Muhammad wasn't ginger, stop coping>The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, is neither too short nor too tall. His hair are neither curly nor straight, but a mixture of the two. He is a man of black hair and large skull. - Ali ibn Abi Talib>I saw a man, pure and clean, with a handsome face and a fine figure. He was not marred by a skinny body, nor was he overly small in the head and neck. He was graceful and elegant, with intensely black eyes and thick eyelashes. There was a huskiness in his voice, and his neck was long. His beard was thick, and his eyebrows were finely arched and joined together. - Umm Ma'bad
>>17280822red beard you retarded brown mutt
>>17280824Dyed retard
>>17280819You cluster DNA in populations to compare them. That's what a PCA doesYou don't compute an ethnic relation with one set of alleles. You compare the whole genomeAncient Egyptians cluster with modern browns and their genome has the same genes to express brown skin. Therefore they were brown. You denying this doesn't mean anything
>>17280809bunch of baseless schizo ramblings>>17280819>Which gene produces brown skin then? Go ahead, post it. retarded faggot, ancient egyptian samples have low rates of derived alleles associated with light features just like modern MENAs, you have no idea what you're talking about, you're literally some faggot from /pol/ that stumbled here by mistake>>17280818samefag, you're alone in your madness and denial of reality
>>17280822Lmaohttps://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Muhammad%27s_White_Complexion>Jurairi reported: I said to Abu Tufail: Did you see Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)? He said: Yes, he had a white handsome face. Muslim b. Hajjaj said: Abu Tufail who died in 100 Hijra was the last of the Companions of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him).Sahih Muslim 30:5777, See Also Sahih Muslim 30:5786>Throughout, the Hadith and other sources stress the ‘whiteness of his thighs’, the ‘whiteness of his legs’, the ‘’whiteness of his cheeks, back, legs, belly”, etc.” Moreover, several verses mandate that anyone who slurs Mohammed as ‘Black’ ( or slurs him in any way ) must be killed. Mohammed denigrates Negroes, even those who had joined his Muslims and were loyal companions. He describes them as looking like raisins. ( All references are noted below. )Muhammad would have fucking killed you dude. He would've killed you for even suggesting he looks part nigger.
>>17280844>no mentions of red hairsright
>>17280838>everyone who disagrees with me is the same personget help schizo
>>17280834>[post talks about PCA of muttniggers being close to PCA of white people who got mutted by niggers as expected]So there is no such thing as a "brown gene". We already knew this, but glad you are accepting it too.
>>17280838>retarded faggot, ancient egyptian samples have low rates of derived alleles associated with light features just like modern MENAs, you have no idea what you're talking about, you're literally some faggot from /pol/ that stumbled here by mistakeBlahblaha whining and crying.So are you gonna name the brown people gene or not?
>>17280844White skinned like pic rel, not like pink nordics, otherwise he would died of skin cancer
>>17280852>being close to PCA of white people who got mutted by niggers as expectedThat's not what the PCA shows. You don't know how to read a PCA. They cluster as a completely separate group.>So there is no such thing as a "brown gene". There are collections of alleles which control expression of melanin and the Egyptians had collections of alleles which produced brown skin. They also cluster as exactly the same with modern brown people who also have brown skin and said alleles.
>>17280838The highest concentration of J* haplogroup genes is from the Ingush Caucasian people. The second highest is from Chechens like my picrel.J* is a Caucasian gene which raped the original Natufian E* out of existence. The original Semites were white looking. Something between Caucasians like Chechens and Ashkanazi Jews.
>>17280858>There's no brown gene! There's a MIXTURE of genesYou are getting it. Brown = rape baby MIXTURE of whites fucking nigger slaves.
>>17280867Original Afroasiatics (Semites, Egyptians, Berbers) were E. Caucasian speakers like Hurrians were JAll brown
>>17280853>Blahblaha whining and crying.>So are you gonna name the brown people gene or not?you are fucking stupid and you don't know shit about the argumentlack of lightening alleles cause darker skin, the ancient egyptians had similar amounts of derived lightening alleles that modern menas have, hence these results >>17280289
>>17280875>Original Afroasiatics (Semites, Egyptians, Berbers) were E.Ok, so you're saying modern Semites are mostlythe rape babies of Caucasians then?
>>17280867>The highest concentration of J* haplogroup genes is from the Ingush Caucasian people. The second highest is from Chechens like my picrel.irrelevant, you don't know what haplogroups are, J entered the middle east much before the arabs were even a thing, and it entered from iran>* is a Caucasian gene which raped the original Natufian E* out of existence. The original Semites were white looking. Something between Caucasians like Chechens and Ashkanazi Jews.are you actually trying to ascertain appearance from haplogroups? just lol
>>17280870No, the vast majority of genes are not mendelian. That doesn't have to do with how to look at a PCA and how to predict phenotype from genotype based on genome wide associations.The ancient Egyptians had the mix of alleles that make people brown and they have the same cluster as modern browns. The modern Egyptians are not "white peopl3 who were darkened by blacks" they are brown people who descend from previous brown people. The ancient Egyptians were brown and looked like brown people. The DNA evidence proves this.
>>17280881Yes Kuro-Araxes Hurrians mixed with them hard
How did brown people go from "allegedly" creating all the ancient civilizations to being incompetent and inferior to white people today that have done and made everything of note in the last 500 years?That's like saying donkeys built space rockets. The facts you brownoids push don't pass the check.
>>17280882>are you actually trying to ascertain appearance from haplogroups? just lolThat's what Archeogenetic reconstructions do.
>>17280883>The modern Egyptians are not "white peopl3 who were darkened by blacks" they are brown people who descend from previous brown people. The ancient Egyptians were brown and looked like brown people. The DNA evidence proves this.They are Mediterraneans.
>>17280898>That's what Archeogenetic reconstructions do.they absolutely don't, haplogroups are not relevant to appearance
>>17280896you are brown and the ancient egyptian civilization was a despotic polity with an inbred monarch ruling over a bunch of (almost slave) peasants, literally no better than modern saudi arabia
>>17280905yes, all people that live in the mediterranean are mediterraneans, but "mediterranean" isn't a genetic cluster, they were genetically closer to non mediterranean saudis than to most other mediterranean populations
>>17280913>you are brownNo I am not brown, I am white. You also did not answer my question.
>>17280883>No, the vast majority of genes are not mendelianIncorrect. Intra-racial breeding is 100% Mendelian, while inter-racial breeding is mostly not Mendelian.Why? Because basal West Eurasians all have different alleles of SLC24A5. Eurasians reproducing offspring therefore have healthy white skinned babies.But black SSA have no allele of SLC24A5, they don't reproduce with West Eurasians according to Mendelian genetics.Instead the chromosome misaligns, and SLC24A5 becomes an introgen. This is what causes "brown skin" phenotypes. This is not a gene, it is the lack of a functional gene; brown skin is a dysgenic phenotype as a result of interracial breeding.
>>17280918i did, you're strangely treating ancient egyptian civilization as if it was some sort of space fearing pinnacle of civilization, it' was a shithole despotic polity with an inbred monarch ruling over a bunch of extremely poor peasants literally no better than modern saudi arabia
>>17280920>Incorrect. Intra-racial breeding is 100% Mendelian, while inter-racial breeding is mostly not Mendelian.WrongThe rest of your post doesn't mean anything because as I already said and the data already shows, the ancient Egyptians shared the alleles with modern browns to make brown skin. Also "dysgenic" is not a real thing dumbfuck, especially not when it comes to skin color alleles. You being a pigshit for brained moron and simply claiming that melanin production is dysgenic doesnt mean anything
>>17280882>are you actually trying to ascertain appearance from haplogroups? just lolNo. The modern peoples of Caucasian mountains are unmixed. This is why it is fair to say original J* paternal ancestors look like them. No conclusions can be drawn from MENA J* because they are mixed with Africans, Mongols, Greeks, Romans, Crusaders etc.The original J* was likely some warrior race from the Caucasian mountains that split over the Caspain then came down from Iran. They then bred the local women. Here they might look something like modern Jews because those were mostly isolated and protected from Mongol-African admixture which permeated into Islamic places.
>>17280928>shared the alleles with modern browns to make brown skin.Could you name the alleles then?This is the only thing we asked of you, not your gigawalls of copeposting.
>>17280920all of what you said is nonsensical garbage i don't know why you keep repeating itthere are various snps that lighten your features, ancient egyptians, like modern MENAs were less derived for these snps than europeans are, and therefore just like modern MENAs they end up scoring darker skinpic rel are the predictions for skin color for the ancient egyptians released
>>17280928>Also "dysgenic" is not a real thing dumbfuck,It is, like sickle cell and low IQs also found in MENA.
>>17280942>various snps that lighten your featuresI already said this. There are "white genes". There are no "brown genes".Just dysgenic part white dysfunctional genes.
>>17280938>Could you name the alleles then?are you fucking stupid, you don't know shit about genetics don't even trythere are various alleles that determine lighter skin, like the rs1426654 in SLC24A5 or the rs16891982 in SLC45A2, the rs12913832 in HERC2 is very important for eye color but has also an effect on skin color, there are others of coursethere's no "brown" or "white" allele, MENA people, both the ancient egyptians and the modern MENAs, have less derived alleles for light features in these snp positions causing the skin to be darker, this is the skin color prediction of the ancient egyptians released >>17280942
>>17280896If you want an actual answer, it's monotheism.The ancient brown people were polytheists and like all polytheism they produced grand civilizations. This is true for all modern civilizations, from Rome to Egypt to China to Mesopotamians to Carthage to the Indians to the Incans to the Ethiopians and all over the world.Modern browns in the middle east are Muslim and therefore monotheistic. Much like Christianity destroyed the wrst and turned it into a shithole until the enlightment where white men killed Christianity and became naturalists, the brown modern people need to destroy Islam and their monotheistic dogshit and they will achieve the heights of their ancestors again. We see this also in India where under the polytheists India was a sprawling grand civilization, then the Muslim mughals took over and under monotheism it became a shithole. Now that they're destroying Islam, India is rising again.It's purely due to being a monotheistic. The objective fact is that there are multiple Gods and any civilization which pisses off the other Gods by only worshipping one God will be destroyed and turned into a shithole. >Verification not required.
>>17280947>I already said this. There are "white genes". There are no "brown genes".no, there are no "white" or "brown" genes, there are snps that lighten your features, and ancient egyptians and MENAs are less derived and more ancestral for these snps, making them darker, literally just stop, you clearly don't know shit about the argument, your knowledge is "pol" tier, you literally just stumbled here by mistake seeking confirmation for your memes
>>17280950*this is true for all ancient civilizations
>>17280942East Asians have unique genes that determine their skin colour e.g. M1CR1 mutations which are not found anywhere else.West Eurasians have unique genes that determine their skin colour e.g. SLC24A5 which are not found anywhere else.There are genes for white skin. There are genes for yellow skin.There are no genes for brown skin. Just dysfunctional white skin genes mixed with black SSA progeny.
>>17280949>there are various alleles that determine lighter skin, like the rs1426654 in SLC24A5 or the rs16891982 in SLC45A2, the rs12913832 in HERC2 is very important for eye color but has also an effect on skin color, there are others of courseOk, thank you for copy-pasting the wikipedia article you rushed to read.>there's no "brown" or "white" allele, There are white genes. And different alleles of those genes are all white too.>MENA people, both the ancient egyptians and the modern MENAs, have less derived alleles for light features in these snp positions causing the skin to be darker, this is the skin color prediction of the ancient egyptians releasedDo you know what the word "allele" means? You only have one allele per chromosome, there aren't "less" or "more.
>>17280896Brown Iberians and Italians are still superior in almost everything to white east europeans. Italians also are best at art and architecture like Greco-Romans. Jews are great at science and superior to anyone per capita. Middle east was ruined by islam inbreeding.
>>17280967You're a fucking moron dude.The point is that the ancient Egyptians had alleles which cause brown skin NOT white skin. They were not white people they were brown. You ranting about white vs black alleles doesn't mean anything. The fact that brown skin is caused by a mix of alleles has nothing to do with the proven fact that the ancient Egyptians had the mix of alleles which cause brown skin and therefore were brown.
>>17280958no, there are multiple snps that lighten your features, ancient menas had less derived positions in these snps than europeans, just like the modern ones, both are brown, here are the preds: >>17280942argument closed, anything else are dumb pol bullshits
>>17280975>The point is that the ancient Egyptians had alleles which cause brown skin NOT white skinWrong. They had alleles for white skin.They had zero nigger DNA, unlike modern Egyptians.Mix white and black you get brown. Toddler colour theory that you are failing.
>>17280967>Ok, thank you for copy-pasting the wikipedia article you rushed to read.i didn't read any wikipedia article you dumb faggot>There are white genes.there are multiple snps that lighten your features, not "white genes">And different alleles of those genes are all white too.no, only specific snps lighten your features, not all the snps in the HERC2 for example contribute to lighter features, rs12913832 and a few others do, not the entire HERC2 cluster>Do you know what the word "allele" means? You only have one allele per chromosome, there aren't "less" or "more.you are a dumb faggot, ancient egyptians and modern MENAs have less DERIVED and more ANCESTRAL in those snp positions, you clearly don't know shit about the argument
>>17280980>WrongNope>They had alleles for white skin.No, they had alleles for brown skin>They had zero nigger DNA, unlike modern Egyptians.That doesn't mean anything. 5% back DNA doesn't turn a white person brown. They were brown to begin with as the DNA evidence conclusively proves.>Mix white and black you get brown. Toddler colour theory that you are failing.You're genuinely a moron.
>>17280980Mixing white and black makes gray not brown retard. Brown is a shade of orange in color theory
>>17280980>They had alleles for white skin.they had some alleles for lighter pigmentation, as much as modern egyptians do, hence these predictions >>17280942 that predict them as brown>They had zero nigger DNA, unlike modern Egyptians.wrong again, from the study>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations>Mix white and black you get brown. Toddler colour theory that you are failing.no, also you are the same anon since you're the only one that posts this "black+white=brown" garbage despite you trying to samefag as different people beforethe egyptians are a mixture of natufians(brown) >>17280626, iran_N(brown) and anatolian farmer(brownish), they were not white and the people that created them were not white
>>17280977>ancient menas had less derived positions in these snps than europeans, just like the modern ones, both are brown, here are the preds:Ancient Egyptians had SLC24A5, but no A2.Picrel is what modern peopple with SLC24A5, but no A2 look like. This is exactly the skin pigmentation genotype of Ancient EgyptiansThey are not "brown" (which doesn't exist). They are WHITE. Modern Egyptians have black African DNA chromosome misalignments. Some of the genetically purer ones actually also look like picrel.
>>17280850easily edited
>>17280990>alleles for brown skinCan you post the name of these alleles?
>>17280999The other anon already did.
>>17280995>Ancient Egyptians had SLC24A5, but no A2.>Picrel is what modern peopple with SLC24A5, but no A2 look like. This is exactly the skin pigmentation genotype of Ancient Egyptiansvarious alleles determine skin color, we have their predictions >>17280942 they were brown, argument closed, you don't know shit about genetics, quit even trying>They are not "brown" (which doesn't exist). They are WHITE. they were brown like modern egyptians and other MENAs
>>17280995We have tons of ancient egyptian depictions and they look brown
>>17280993Human colour (white), is not literal white dumbfuck.
>>17280999discussed that already >>17280949, quit it with this "brown alleles", egyptians had less derived aleles for rs12913832, rs16891982, rs683, rs1426654, rs1800414 and other snps that determine lighter features, making them brown in the full prediction >>17280942
>>17280972The Middle East got incest from the Egyptians and homosexuality from the Greeks.
>>17281001No, I made those posts. Please post genes associated with "brown skin".
>>17281008>incest from the EgyptiansOnly royals.>homosexualityIrrelevant.
>>17281003>tans Ok>>17281006>rs12913832,OCA2
>>17281010>No, I made those posts. Please post genes associated with "brown skin".let me copy past the answer already>there are various alleles that determine lighter skin, like the rs1426654 in SLC24A5 or the rs16891982 in SLC45A2, the rs12913832 in HERC2 is very important for eye color but has also an effect on skin color, there are others of course>there's no "brown" or "white" allele, MENA people, both the ancient egyptians and the modern MENAs, have less derived alleles for light features in these snp positions causing the skin to be darker, this is the skin color prediction of the ancient egyptians released >>17280942don't ask dumb questions anymore
>>17281006>rs12913832This SNP is associated with blue eyes and is mostly found in Northern Europe.A white gene. The others are all also white genes.
>>17281015>OCA2actual retard, there are various snps under the OCA2/HERC2 cluster and not all contribute or contribute the same to light pigmentation, rs12913832 is very important, rs1800407 and rs1470608 that are also under the OCA2 cluster are less important, others are completely irrelevant
>>17281022>This SNP is associated with blue eyes and is mostly found in Northern Europe.it's associate with blue eyes and to a lesser extent with light skin and hairs tooit's not a "white gene", a person that plots with northern europeans thanks to his millions of snps being similar to a northern european is white even if has ancestral and not derived alleles in rs12913832
>>17280980if your distance from europeans is even greater than a syrian you are not white, even if syrians have medieval 1% sub saharan ancestry on average, syrians themselves are also not white, that 1% sub saharan ancestry in the medieval ages didn't turn them brown, they were brown before
>>17281023How deep do you want to keep digging this hole Anon?
>>17281035>How deep do you want to keep digging this hole Anon?i'm not digging any hole, i know this study you're posting, what exactly are you trying to prove with this? and how does a map of the modern distribution of rs12913832 disproves the fact that rs12913832 is not the only snp in the OCA2/HERC2 cluster and there are many other snps in that cluster that contribute less or not at all to pigmentation?you're a dumbfuck that doesn't know shit about genetics
>>17280289>>17280305>>17280310Thread should've ended after these. However it seems that the /pol/ cancer has spread its fugly roots deep into this board by now.
>>17281049NTA but you clearly know nothing about genetics either. Kill yourselves, both of you.
>>17281080you are that anon and you're a faggot and you lost
>>17281073yeah, it's this new anon that say "black plus whites equals brown" or other outdated nonsense and doesn't care about any proof because it's all a jewish conspiracy or something and posts clickbait articles, he infests any thread about ancient egypt with his nonsense
>>17281098>black plus whites equals brown
>>17281106not according to genetics
>>17281112You are a retard. when a white and black person make a baby it is brown and that is where brown people come fromkeep repeating your dumb schizo ramblings about browns being some unique species if you want but nobody who touches grass will ever take you seriously
>>17281127>and that is where brown people come fromno, "brown" people have existed since forever, here an example from the early mesolithic >>17280626>keep repeating your dumb schizo ramblings about browns being some unique species if you want but nobody who touches grass will ever take you seriously"browns" aren't a unique species but if the ancient egyptians were alive today they would be considered brown in the same way modern MENAs are
>>17281137Finding examples of very old brown mutts doesn't prove brown mutts are a unique species.
>>17281034All mutt races, especially those raped by Mongols, Greco-Romans and who have black African DNA from slavery era are irrelevant as any meaningful yard stick for anything at all.
>>17281106Not really>>17281127What modern and black and brown people generate is irrelevant, schoolyard levels of conversation
>>17281106>>17281127just go away, you're obviously some little faggot from /pol/ that doesn't care about reality, just go back to /pol/
>>17281073I guess Nature publishes /pol/ papers now too.
>>17281143What about this is so hard for you to get through your pigshit brain?The ancient Egyptians were brown in the exact same way modern middle east and north African people are. Whether brown is a fusion of white and black alleles or a unique set had no relevance whatsoever to this conversation
>>17281143>Finding examples of very old brown mutts doesn't prove brown mutts are a unique species.no one said they are a "unique species" in fact i told you in my comment that they weren't, but if the egyptians were alive today they would be considered "brown" and in the same category as modern MENAs, ancient egyptians derive most of their ancestry from those mesolithic guys, that had not european/white ancestry whatsoever
>>17281143No but it proves that people that weren't white or European inhabited the mena tens of thousands of years before the Arab expansion or the slave trade
>>17281150syrians have 1% or at best 2% black dna from slavery era and zero mongol admixture, they're brown, the ancient egyptians were even less related to europeans than syrians are
I won again, thanks for playing. Maybe you will win tomorrow and prove brown people were ever not just the result of race mixing white civilization builders and their black slaves.
>>17281098>>17281112Google Coulered people.>>17281163All studies posted ITT prove Ancient Egyptians were White.Modern Egyptians have black African DNA.
>>17281200They literally prove the opposite, that the ancient Egyptians have the same distribution of alleles that make then brown as the modern ones do.
>>17281193No, you didn't. You lost again and have no argument.The DNA proves that they're brown, buddy. Posting cats doesn't change this.
>>17281200>All studies posted ITT prove Ancient Egyptians were White.they don't, they prove that they were brown, they plot like middle easterners >>17280528, they score the same components of a saudi >>17280606, they're predicted as brown skinned >>17280942they also have deeper african ancestry according to the study>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations
>>17281193Nope you lost, yes you'll probably be back in a few days to lose some more
>>17281193What causes this level of delusion?
>>17281193no, you lost again
>>17281187>syrians have 1% or at best 2% black dna from slavery era and zero mongol admixture, they're brown, the ancient egyptians were even less related to europeans than syrians areActually it's closer to 6-7%, but this is the average and is not spread out through the population. Many Syrians are still pure West Eurasians, while some have a lot of SSA DNA. You can see this in their phenotypes as well, some look perfectly normal, others look abhorently dysgenic, with coily hair, mishapen skulls etc.IQ is a similar story, the national IQ is low, but those closer to pure Levantines are higher IQ than the dysgenic colonists from the Arabic slave trade era.
>>17281207>the ancient Egyptians have the same distribution of alleles that make then brown as the modern ones do.See >>17280606 again.Where are the red nigger alleles in Ancient Egyptian samples? Could you highlight them?
>>17281193This. I'm also done.The coping shitskins are now just in full denial-anger transition stage, but aren't bringing any actual new arguments to the table.Must be the low from all the black SSA DNA in their brains. Poor sub 90 IQs.
>>17280972The Ancient Egyptians also practiced cousin marriage you dumb Facebook tard.
>>17281221>Where are the red nigger alleles in Ancient Egyptian samples? Could you highlight them?ancient egyptians score like literal bedouins or saudis, they're not fucking whitethis quote is from the study>Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populationsthey have more deeper african ancestry
Did the thread get auto saged
>>17281226>This. I'm also done.you are samefagging>>17281217>Actually it's closer to 6-7%, but this is the average and is not spread out through the population. Many Syrians are still pure West Eurasians, while some have a lot of SSA DNA. You can see this in their phenotypes as well, some look perfectly normal, others look abhorently dysgenic, with coily hair, mishapen skulls etc.it's closer to 2% and almost all look brown, this logic is retarded, they're not whites with a bit of browns here and there
>>17281221>See >>17280606 # again.That literally shows that they're brown, retard
>>17281226you are brown, and you aren't bringing any new arguments to the table, screaming about ancient egyptians being white even tho everything proves they weren't isn't bringing anything to the table
>>17281226I'm white, retard. The ancient Egyptians were not.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mytripsmypics/10266514525Syrians are whites with a bit of browns here and there
>>17281255>source a few cherrypicked individualsthey are brown with a few lighter looking people here and there
>>17281238yes thankfully, ancient egyptian threads have been completely ruined by this /pol/ weirdo
syrians haven't changed much compared to bronze age syrians, at best they're 1% more sub saharan on average, if anything they're a lot more steppe, some modern syrians are easily 12% steppe
>>17280972>Brown Iberians and Italians are still superior in almost everything to white east europeans. Italians also are best at art and architecture like Greco-Romans. Jews are great at science and superior to anyone per capita. Middle east was ruined by islam inbreeding.egyptian rulers were inbred as fuck
>>17281271Yes.>they are brownWhites mixed with Africans.> with a few lighter looking people here and thereWhites.
>>17281296Ancient middle easterners were +10% more ANF and 0% steppeshit. Based.
>>17281296Precisely, barely any change.This is how much damage SSA does to the genome because of misaligned chromosomes. There's a reason drop of tar principle works so well for phenotypes.Some Cape Coulered's are only 12.5% black DNA, but just look black or very dark brown. The mixture is not Mendelian %. Just a single generation is enough to permanently destroy the functional alleles of the whole genome.
>>17281317It's blatantly obvious that you have no understanding of how DNA works
>>17281317>This is how much damage SSA does to the genome because of misaligned chromosomes. There's a reason drop of tar principle works so well for phenotypes.nah, shut up retard, stop spamming this fanfics
>>17281306didn't you say you were getting the fuck outta here you pol faggot?they are brown and they were always brown, the brown average was the average also in the past and the few looking whiter people are and were the exception in the past too
>>17281310some became less natufian compared to the bronze age
>>17281361Philistine and Greek rape
>>17280281Source: pol and varg told me
>>17280762Meds. Now.
>>17281336>>17281345>>17281348>All these posts one minute apart.You were talking with at least three different people btw. The other two left.These are all just common facts, they aren't disputed by anyone. Once you stop freaking out and actually read the posts slowly or do your own research you will probably agree.
>>17281593nah, it's always you saying the same shit and justifying it the same way>These are all just common factsthey aren't, quit repeating your nonsense>. Once you stop freaking out and actually read the posts slowly or do your own research you will probably agree.no, but that's what you have to do, now shoo away like you said you would do
>>17281593stop samefagging, you lost the argument
>>17281296>>17281361Is this shitty tool for real. Syrians and Muslimgroid Lebs have a ton of negroid admixture. I'm pretty sure Syrians would be white if not for that.
>>17281870> I'm pretty sure Syrians would be white if not for that.absolutely nope>Syrians and Muslimgroid Lebs have a ton of negroid admixture.this is pretty old and is using modern composites to model populations not ancient ones, ancient egyptians would score sub saharan ancestry too in this kind of model
>>17281885>>17281870this is from the egyptian study (a zoomed section of this >>17280606)brown is natufian, light blue is iran_n and dark blue is anatolian_n and red is sub saharan, syrians are probably 2% sub saharan overall
>>17281870they don't seem to have much
>>17281907>>17281995Contaminated nonetheless and Syrians don't have much Natufian. They're mostly ANF + Iran_N. It can be confused for nig in these kind of models.
>>17282062I don't think there wouldn't be such a discrepancy in upper and lower class Syrians in looks if the lower classes weren't nig mutts.
>>17282062>Contaminated nonetheless2% sub saharan at most>They're mostly ANF + Iran_N. It can be confused for nig in these kind of models.well, no they have natufian, these >>17281907 >>17281995 are the only models with ancients , this >>17281870 is not modeling populations with ancients
>>17282078>I don't think there wouldn't be such a discrepancy in upper and lower class Syrians in looks if the lower classes weren't nig mutts.syrians are brown, syrians were brown in the past too
>>17282109Natufians/PPNB are a hypothetical descent for most Syrians, because they didn't really spam through their most of their area. They're not particularly close to them either. They can be modeled as ANF + Iran_N + groid.
>>17282127eh, no, here >>17281995 >>17281907 they're modeled with natufians
>>17282172But there are other studies that model them as ANF+ Iran_N. I see quite a few quadroon/nafri tier low class Syrians and whiter looking upper class ones, so I'm leaning more towards them being nig mutts instead.
>>17282181>But there are other studies that model them as ANF+ Iran_Nwhen natufian or levant_ppnb is used the syrians always pick it up, since they have some of it
Druze are a safe bet. They don't have muttish looking people like Syrians do.
>>17280336Rich white people hate poor white people.
