>Newfag? Read this:https://pastebin.com/Ndb2jSAuhttps://howtogetagun.ca/>Want to hunt? CFG Hunting license info:https://pastebin.com/nC8RpYb3>Want to spend your shekels?https://almostprohibited.ca/>Recommended /cangen/ vendors list (patched 04.25.2024):https://pastebin.com/4pshBiBt>Want to help firearm rights?https://firearmrights.caComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64636724What chambering?
>>646367346.5 Creedmore. I Haven't broke it in yet.
>>64636739Good lad, recommend the bushnell match pro ED if you haven’t gotten glass already.Hasn’t let me down in any of my PRS matches this year
>CANADA IS NOT CANADA>UNLESS>ALL MEMBERS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CAN FULLY PARTICIPATE IN ALL ASPECTS OF CANADIAN LIFEOh JudeaaaOur home with naive goys https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DgMaisibLEM
>>64636768Looks good. You have experience with Primary Arm's optics? I was looking at their SLx 4.5-27X56 FFP which seems like it's a more affordable version of the Bushnell you recommended.Also, any good precision rifle instructional content that you'd recommend to a novice? I'm working through Magpul's 'Art of the Precision Rifle' atm.
Ugly gun
>>64633076I will have to look, but I'm gonna break gun rule #2 and sell mine. I just don't like my Tec-22 and it takes Ruger mags.
>>64634256>>>64618752 (You) #>Yup, people that dont actually own one dont understand these are heavy as fuck and made of thick fucking steel.>Also Lage just came out with a 5.56 belt fed upper for these and a .22 LR upper that uses Ruger 10/22 mags.>For a transferable machine gun you cant beat the value.Still, I am motivated to sell, mine's semi and I have some (rare?) accessories all from Intertec. Without FRT, the fun just isn't there. Screwing on the bbl extention is a violation. And the carbine upper is only cool with the wire stock, if then. Thinking to fund a Lima6 with frt.
>>64634303Well yeah, if its a semi auto then like whats the point? lol the whole point of the Mac platform is to be a full auto assault style weapon. It was originally made to replace the M1911 as a more capable side arm and did see some use as suppressed weapon for special forces in Vietnam. A lot of people dont know that, but it was actually in Govt service for a short duration and they did have a contract with the Govt. I would only own a semi auto one if it were one of the rare open bolt semis that pop up from time to time, those actually appreciate and are worth a few grand.
>>64618290The Mac-10 is one of the most beautiful smgs ever made.You know what's ugly? Your mom's flaps.
>>64620318ngl, I like it.
post groupshere are my two best papers50m with 22LR, single shot bolt action rifle, this is between 0.85 and 0.7 MOApost ammo type, distance, and weapon used
>>64636697Shut up, schizo-boy.
>>64636671>PMC Bronze.PMC Bronze surprises me sometimes. I don't discount it. Also sometimes some guns really like and really work well with ammunition you might otherwise dismiss. I had a Kel-Tec CP33 that was a virtual laser with goddamn Thunderbolts of all things.>>64636645Well, I know nothing about the rifle. But you're approaching MOA. If you're not at the limit of the rifle's mechanical accuracy I expect you'll be able to bring it down to MOA with more practice. Keep it up Anon.
>>64636704>Also sometimes some guns really like and really work well with ammunition you might otherwise dismiss. Can't really debate that since I recently found out the .22 ammo my old Mossberg 151 likes more than anything, in both reliability and accuracy, is fucking Blazer of all things.
>>64636704>But you're approaching MOA.Yeah, all in all I can be pretty happy with ~1.25-1.5 MOA. I shit you not it was around 3.5 MOA before I figured out the barrel whip screw and retorqued everything.
>>64636585>decentIt's excellent. Post groups.
Why is this ugly piece of shit so coveted and grailed among normie firearm social media? I’m sure it’s a pleasure to shoot but it looks soulless as fuck and has all those gay cutouts, the ugly star logo, and a flared magwell looks like ass on a 1911. People actually pay $2,000 plus for these.
Tisas makes a 2011 for $500 fucking dollars, I think it's hilarious people will still justify their Staccatos lol.
>>64625774Fuck yamudda
>>64636714It’s okay not affording a staccato but coping that Tisas is just as good is actually pretty on brand for being a boomer. Buying a foreign product while denigrating the U.S. made product if not the U.S. company that invented said product.
>>64636714They're $800 minimum but yeah. They're not really that bad, just having a well fitted bushing and barrel in the slide on top of the frame is worth $800, even if you put another $700 in ignition parts and safeties on it
>>64636730So you only buy American products, right? >>64636776
>Cumrag Pidorovich, is time to assault hohol position>Here's your armored ladahttps://files.catbox.moe/9k57se.MP4
>>64635793
>>64636622keks
These Ukraine footage is so strange. It's like "MAAASSIVE ARMOUR PUSH IN DONBAS" and you see 3 apcs. Is this just Rasha being shit? Has my view of armoured warfare been skewed by movies, and the armour column is just so spread out you can't see it all?
>>64636729They lost 10k armor vehicles, what do you expect them to use
>>64636729Just the modern clickbait shit where no one clicks headlines with realistic wording.
ND threadI NDed a .300 Win Mag in my living room>end of hunting season>plop down in my recliner with my model 70 to clean it and put up for the year>The bolt on the older ones won't open on safe or half safe>Guess I had my finger on the trigger>Fucking BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM into my fireplace>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE like a motherfucker>mortar and little chunks of fire brick on what seems like every square fucking inch of the houseJesus Christ that was awful
ok
>>64636754>go to clean glonck>swear i dropped the magazine out>pull slide back make sure chamber is empty>let it go forward, begin to disassemble it>pull trigger to let slide forward>*BANG*>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWhew, nothing i couldve done different but these things just happen, thats why you always point it away from yourself
Taliban released footage of their SOF assaulting a compound. Even they are using quadcopter drones for supervising the movements of each operator
>>64629632Who are they fighting? Pakis?
>>64636687This has gotta be bait. Like you said, it's too obvious to be actual shills. My guess is this is a cum/chug/ger raid, or maybe just a disorganized /pol/yp incursion for teh lulz.
>>64636748True and realpolitik-pilled.
>>64636687I'm sorry your wife was fucked by Jody while you were deployed to the sandbox, Private Snuffy. But the fact that you keep calling it demoralization propaganda, instead of seeing it as a major issue to be addressed, is why the Jodies and the Neverserved Bulls will keep plowing your wife. Maybe you could address this issue by ending no-fault divorce. Maybe you could fight for marital protections for active-duty soldiers. Did you know that the chinks will sentence people who cheat on active-duty soldiers to actual jail time?>https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/article/3250747/breaking-military-marriage-10-months-jail-man-china-who-had-affair-wife-pla-soldier-active-dutyNow you could choose to call me a chink shill, while your wife is still being fucked by the Jodies and the Neverserved.Or, you could accept that while the chinks will never be ahead of America on the technological front, they are ahead of us on at least one issue, namely that of marital protection of active-duty servicemembers. And maybe, just maybe, you should be advocating for us to at least do the same as the chinks here, namely in having jail time for cheating army wives and the Jodies as well, and forfeiture of custody and all financial and physical assets on the part of the cheating female half of this military marriage.
>>64636763I'm a neverserved, so this doesn't effect me in the slightest. I just want you to go back to whatever hole you crawled out of.
Ammo compatibility is king for the apocalypse. The best ammo is the one you use.> The list:> 9mm Parabellum. Most available handgun caliber hands down> 7.62x39mm usual. Usual AK pattern rifle round> 5.56x45mm NATO. Usual AR pattern rifle round> 12 gauge> .22 LR. Can be bought very cheaply in bulk. Useful for practice and small game hunting.> .357 Magnum. .357 Revolvers have great ammo compatibility with many calibers> 7.62x51mm NATO/.308 Winchester> 7.62x54mmr> .45 ACP> 30-06 Springfield> 300 AAC Blackout?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64636492Yeah probably but I said bottlenecked high pressure cartridges so that's most 30 cals and 55.6 stuff and 7mm, 8mm, 270, 243 etc. I would not push 44 mag brass too hard either. If you have a revolver in a fantasy apocalypse scenario you can deprime, reload the primers and then just fill to the brim with BP and cast a bullet, you don't need to keep running smokeless at all. Its pretty ideal because you will get a dud primer but you just have to pull the trigger again and you will probably get a cylinder off before the BP starts effecting the weapon. Semi autos are a different matterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9Z0yr49xXw
>>64636468Youre right. I guess I meant reload steel in times of scarcity if you already have the tools and correct propellant. In shtf getting the right double base propellant in your correct burn rate isn't happening. Weird shit was going down in covid. Guys loading 30-06 duplex using unique and .50 cal and 20mm surplus pull down powder.But that's for temporary scarcity.
>>64635897Get a glock 19, ar-15, mossberg 500/remington 870, 10/22, and a flintlock rifle complete with miniball bullet molds. Now you have the best north american kit for under $3k and can feel free to buy whatever other guns tickle your fancy and dump excess money into ammo, sulfur, and potassium nitrate. Honorable mention to a remington 700 in .308 if you live somewhere you would want to take a shot at big game over 500 yds.
>>64636574The key word in all of this is fantasy though anon, it's a fun conversation but based on nonsense really.
>7.62x54Rlol no way.
Pistols (or revolvers), rifles, or shotguns?What do you find most fun and why?For me, it’s shotguns. But revolvers are a close 2nd.
desert eagle
Post gear, discuss gear.Camo chic: Operator modeOld: >>64611658
>>64636533>He needs drug money or something?Well it's a fresh ebay account and he's got more than two so I'll let you be the judge. The price is super low and the presentation is quarter-assed so he clearly needs these to move and fast.>What are these?The Velocity Systems PBZSA, which is a 0.52" thick, 4.15lb SAPI M plate rated to defeat M855A1, 7.62x51mm M80, or 7.62x39mm BZ API. It's been the dominant "M855A1 + M80" plate on the market for a few years if you have $2k. It's like a slightly upgraded Tencate CR6450SA and competes favorably against the LTC 28791. The only plates that compete with it are the LSAPI (3.5lb, same rating but raised BFD limit to 62mm) and LTC's replacement for the 28791, which is projected to do the same thing but 4lb. Last competitor is the Hesco SC3812, which drops BZ API protection but weighs 3.8lb SAPI M and is much thicker. This guy is selling the PBZSAs in a cut like pic related VS-PXULV meant for a covert carrier. These are very likely SOCOM issue.The PXULV is a featherweight all-PE plate rated for just 7.62x39mm MSC. 1.5lb and under 0.4" thick.
>>64636545I have one in my car. I don't need to haul around an ifak. I don't live in a 3rd world country.
>>64636545If you have a daily backpack, that's a great place for a real kit. The tourniquet, if you're going to have on, belongs on you somewhere. I carry mine in the back pocket with the red tip exposed because it's not a gun, it's not weird, and there's a band saw right over there that any one of us might lose a finger on if we're too complacent.
Patiently waiting for 4600 anon to give us the results of his shoot test of the $180 4600s he got from Botach.
>>64628389I had pic rel queued up but op is a ninja.
The shills say you'll definitely buy one.
>>64629913Gen 4 is the only glock I want
are they going to put a steel insert in that trigger guard undercut? I just see that breaking if someone uggas or falls or drops on that at the right angle
>>64636553I know, you already told us you don't shoot
>>64631735>>64631982I have a fat fetish
>>64636593I was wondering the same thing, it's possible that they tie a steel insert into the magazine catch spring area but I doubt it. Wouldn't hurt anything weight wise since they're cutting the recoil spring down by more than half
It's been 2 months...https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hidden-hangars-navys-fa-xx-could-decide-china-fight-trump-moves-now
>>64636167They're going to be flying along subsonic UCAVs anyway, the speed doesn't matter. The F-47's range and payload requirements make it nearly a bomber already, It's going to be more like a stealth F-111 than a stealth F-15C.
>>64636235We don’t know what the exact CCA CONOPS look like currently. It’s very possible they end up forming more of a picket line while the F-47 runs around at high speed playing fire brigade wherever there’s fighting on the front. Even if that isn’t the case if they base F-47 at Guam high speed is very useful just to cut down transit time and increase sortie generation. We have no good public information on payload, but if the variable cycle engines deliver their claimed efficiency increase and the 1000nmi combat radius is taken as closer to the upper bound it won’t need to be a 100k MTOW monster like the F-111. If, and admittedly it’s a big if, Boeing is bidding a similar design for both NGAD and F-47 then the MTOW is probably in the 80k range similar to the F-22, as that puts it in the right size class to more or less max current carrier cat and trap weights. With the USAF focusing on combat mass there’s no reason to cancel a program that hasn’t hit major developmental stumbling blocks and would be more able to deliver on that mass, in favor of forcing a larger, more expensive, and very in demand platform into that role. Even with the missileer concept only being talked about as a supplement the strategic bomber command is already pushing hard against it, as they’re looking down the barrel of a major bomber shortfall as the B-1s approach the end of their useful service life and have no interest in sharing their production lines until that shortfall is addressed sometime next decade.
>>64636351>If, and admittedly it’s a big if, Boeing is bidding a similar design for both NGAD and F-47 then the MTOW is probably in the 80k range similar to the F-22, as that puts it in the right size class to more or less max current carrier cat and trap weights.Assuming you meant FA-XX, my understanding is that it's planned to use mature 30,000 lbf F110 engines, which suggests a smaller and lighter aircraft compared to the 40,000lbf XA102/XA103.>strategic bomber command is already pushing hard against it, as they’re looking down the barrel of a major bomber shortfall as the B-1s approach the end of their useful service lifeSAC/GSC can fuck right off back to the 60s. Their role is no longer necessary, SLBMs can handle 100% of nuclear deterrence. There's no need for the overhead if their job is to spend 99.999% of the time jerking off and 0.001% on Midnight Hammer type shit.Perhaps the right call would have been to cancel B-21 rather than F-47, but they're examples of convergent evolution and the B-21 is here already.
>>64636428Yeah I meant F/A-XX, my bad there. F110 for that is the rumor I’ve heard also, though I’ve also read they intend it to be a “more strike than fighter” kind of deal, so I’ve found it hard to estimate what performance specs they’re targeting. I think it’s possible they end up in a similar weight bracket, but with F/A-XX having much lower top end flight performance. The Navy at least acknowledges they have a lot less room in the budget for it and don’t seem to intend on gold plating it to Air Force level. Ultimately I expect F/A-XX to be a very heavy bird though, cat limited probably, as bay size will largely determine weight and it will need to have fairly large bays if they want it to be a better striker than the F-35. IIRC those can already do a pair of AARGM-ERs with a pair of AMRAAMs internally, so to justify the expense of the new program I’d imagine we’re probably talking about a bird that could haul 4x AARGM-ERs. But at that point the bays would be so large they’re bordering on internal carriage for a pair of JASSMs, which is a tall order. As far as strategic bomber command goes, I get their position. I agree their nuclear role isn’t very important these days, but it’s the conventional missions they’d be called on for in a war with China that would really tax them, and I think they should have first dibs on B-21 production for that, as they do face a major airframe shortfall next decade. Plus I’d imagine a missileer conversion of a B-21 is probably a 5+ year project so I don’t think it’d be the worst to top them up first and start looking at that seriously in the early 2030s once we have a better idea of how CCAs will fit into the force structure in practice.
>>64636554I also think the FA-XX will be very heavy by Navy standards, but I'm certain that the F-47 is targeting increased range and payload rather than increased energy-maneuverability. There may have been questions about the relative value of aerodynamic performance vs stealth in the 90s, but by now it's clear that stealth is the absolute measure of an aircraft's combat performance, dogfights now are lucky to last long enough for the loser to realize he's not alone.As far as strategic bombing goes, I'm not even sure how it differs from tactical bombing in an era of precision munitions. What's the difference between dropping a JDAM on a radar and dropping a MOP on an underground enrichment facility? Just the range and the payload? But if even air superiority fighters are prioritizing range and payload these days, that would seem to push attack and strike aircraft into bomber territory.We're at a junction here where all aircraft want the same things: stealth, range, payload, and powerful radar/EW. Unlike any point before this in history, none of those things are mutually exclusive. There's no longer any compromises to be made, no longer any roles. How good of an aircraft you have for (X) is purely a matter of how much it costs.
>they added half MOA adjustments to the A4/M4 carry handle for camp perry/KD qualificationsA2 sights and A4 carry handles both have the same zero clicks. it's like 1 3/8th inch or whatever fucking weirdo shit for the front sight and half MOA for the rear sight windage. On an M16A2/A3 the elevation drum on the rear sight is 1 click per MOA 300-800 meters and on the M16A4/M4 its 300-600 meters 1/2 moa per click. The Z for zeroing is present on both the A2/A3 and the detachable carry handle and it's for zeroing a 20 inch barrel and it's 1 moa off from 300 meters. So, 100% chance the reason they fucking did this is because the come up from 300 to 400 m is 3 moa, from 400-500m is 3.5 moa and then 500-600m is 4.5 moa. on an M4 it would be 300-400m is 3.5 moa 400-500m is 4.5 moa and 500-600m is 5.5 moa.half an MoA wouldn't matter in combat, assuming you even switched the drum so they were 100% doing it for their KD range shooting to make it easier to hit the bulls eye at certain ranges
>>64635848Being wrong. Seems to be a constant for you.
>>64635888you got proven to be gay, retarded and a samefaggot
I just read this retarded thread and imo it stands at post guns.>Anon claimed he owned 3 specific rifles during debate>Gets called to post>Doesn't post>Anon is faggot
>>64636600nice samefaggot, troon
>All this squabbling about A2/A4/M4 rearsight settings>The humble "zero at 25 and forget about it" A1
Could it work for home defense?I am from a country where firearms are almost impossible to get but these are not regulated
>>64635742>>64635777Spears fucking suck indoors.
>>64635990Lmao, the round occupies half of the barrel
>>64635829do you seriously have to ask? there's places where nunchakus and butterfly knives are banned, even though they're obviously inferior to a regular ass baseball bat or pocket knife but since they're used in movies by evil people they obviously have to be banned since that alone makes them a million times more dangerous.
>>64635751>A spear? To throw it?To stab the criminal guy who lunges you after you've shot at him but missed.
>>64635736>Could it work for home defense?Indoors bows are very cumbersome, if the limb slaps a door frame or wall or whatever on release it will pull the bow out of your grip
How effective were these things? Obsidian is said to be extremely sharp and multiple edges instead of one straight blade might be extremely painful.
>>64634753The Vast Expansion Of Flesh.I still remember the sick realization something was wrong here
>>64636184It's very lethal though
>>64634477They ate the sacrifices.Without refrigeration, long pork needs to be alive not to spoil.
>>64634946>he needs more than one swing to end a fightskill issueblade placement is the only thing that matters
>>64634465They're pretty effective and great for training attack and strength too. I prefer a rapier so I can use my Avernic defended though
