[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 920_001-1acb19f4.jpg (101 KB, 1920x1203)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2025/two-turkish-kizilelma-unmanned-fighter-jets-perform-worlds-first-autonomous-formation-flight

Two Turkish Kizilelma Unmanned Fighter Jets Perform World’s First Autonomous Formation Flight

>Turkey’s defense company Baykar announced on December 28, 2025, that two Kizilelma unmanned fighter aircraft successfully conducted the world’s first fully autonomous close formation flight between combat-capable jets. The milestone signals a major shift toward AI-driven air combat and strengthens Turkey’s position as a leading developer of next-generation unmanned aviation.

Instead of wasting your time with chinkshill and vatniks let's talk about Turkey supremacy instead
8 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64688245
>khokhol
Ukraine didn't do anything
>>
>>64688352
The engines are Ukrainian, retard.
Ukrainian and Turkish MIC have been cooperating for a decade.
>>
>>64688358
That doesn't mean anything though. They'll replace it in 3 weeks and ukraine will go back to being irrelevant.
>>
>>64688364
>butthurt reply
I accept your concession.
>>
>>64688399
How am I burrhurt?

File: IMG_6961.jpg (23 KB, 294x340)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
137 replies and 56 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64688133
I always thought HH was a term used mainly on grindr?
>>
>>64688164
I of course wouldn't know anything about that, but in multiplayer gaming circles (especially WW2 related stuff) it's assumed to mean "Heil Hitler", which is why it'll get you banned on servers where the rules say "no nazi stuff".
>>
>>64679802
what does it do?
>>
>>64688126
Try it out, anon. You can easily find a free version packed and configured with a windows 95 emulator.
>>
>>64687094
haven't played in ages. I remember the official servers log IPs for "counter-trolling" reasons, so use a VPN.

File: IMG_0532.jpg (1.87 MB, 3637x3024)
1.87 MB
1.87 MB JPG
Black Nitride edition

Guide: https://files.catbox.moe/9g5sv2.pdf
Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/gs6mLNik

Previous: >>64674842
23 replies and 9 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64688182
The report is that he fired at police with the KSG 12 found in his passenger seat
https://youtu.be/NV51tdV3wJE

>>64688242
>>64688350
The auto glass is replaceable, your life is not

>>64688328
Just a lingerie magazine from the Orient complete with cellulite afflicted model
>>
File: IMG_0603.jpg (1012 KB, 4031x3023)
1012 KB
1012 KB JPG
>>64688240
it's mostly just one, I've tried collecting other models but they just don't model as well or have gone completely digital. It shouldn't be that hard to look erotic but they just don't strike up the right poses

it would be silly to print out images to pose guns on top of so all digital models are out
>>
What do you conceal carry? I'm tired of carrying this boat anchor around with me

>>64688209
Are these super rare/high quality?
>>
I really want to carry my Glock 21 but this bitch is huge. Just slightly longer than my 92, should I just carry a 1911 instead?
>>
>>64688389
just get a horosun eps

EDC? i think so
55 replies and 16 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Smug Madoka.png (194 KB, 478x380)
194 KB
194 KB PNG
>>64685954
Silence is generally a good idea but you would be suprised about how little you need to get a true bill sometimes. There's that old saying about indicting a ham sandwich. Like all stereotypes it has a slight basis in truth.
>>
File: 1631655987960.jpg (6 KB, 285x177)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>64685968
Plea withdrawn. Your speeding ticket is now set for bench trial
>>
File: cody jarrett.jpg (9 KB, 130x259)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>64686020
You will never take me alive copper, ya see!
>>
>>64686017
Indeed, never underestimate your opposition. Linie's character art did look pretty derivative, thanks for posting the one from which!
>>
File: Evidence.jpg (207 KB, 1453x1080)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>64685968
Crazy how the prosecution theory that Rittenhouse's assailants were actually in the right hinged entirely on their interpretation of the background of this image as him committing assault by pointing his AR-15 at nearby arsonists. I thought Binger was evil but he might just be retarded

File: KompactKrissveKtor.jpg (23 KB, 679x347)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
i unbullpuped it for u <3
>>
>>64687758
Fuck ya
mudda
>>
File: bbb.png (368 KB, 539x739)
368 KB
368 KB PNG
shit, i just realised i actualy bullpuped it.
>>
>>64687758
it's still bullpup RETARD

File: Pl8 armor.jpg (258 KB, 640x864)
258 KB
258 KB JPG
>Belligerents: Spanish Empire | Wokou pirates (Japanese)
>Commanders and leaders: Juan Pablo de Carrión | Tay Fusa
>Strength: ~40–60 soldiers (including arquebusiers)
1 galley + several smaller vessels (~6–7 boats total) | ~600 to 1000 warriors in the main land assault 18 sampans + 1 junk + makeshift fort
>Casualties and losses: 3 killed | Heavy hundreds killed; many routed or drowned fleeing
>>
>ship is called junk
>is inferior to contemporary European designs
>>
Japan can't not get BTFO by europe.
>>
>Just a few years later after the Spanish fought actual formally trained Japanese forces and not some Tsushima pirates completely independent from the mainland.
>>
File: 1652448515670.jpg (237 KB, 1134x1582)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
>>64688390
Fuck, pic rel

File: IMG_8967.jpg (97 KB, 1280x720)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>time to shoot a nice .280- ACK!
Which cartridge has the worst name? My vote is .280 ackley improved, with an honorable mention to .30 super carry
>>
>>64688212
Counter point, which name is best?
.257 Roberts
.257 Weatherby
.25-06 AI
.425 Westley Richards
>>
File: 5x8xpd16nzpa1.jpg (85 KB, 901x679)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>64688241
>which name is best?
>>
>>64688281
>no cases are available
Not really a thing.
>>
>>64688281
That is a thick rim.
>>
>25-45 sharps. (Mixed units)
>.308x1.75” (the wrong units for caliberxcaselength)

I’m trying to think of more, but come to think of it, I quite like cartridge names. The imperial naming convention is stupid, granted, but some just roll off the tongue nicely. 350 legend, 360 buckhammer, 6mm SAW, etc. you don’t have to hate everything. It’s nice to like things.

Oh, .224 boz sounds a bit unserious to me because “boz” means “whore” in my mother tongue. I always chuckle when it comes up.

File: Listenhereyoulittleshit.jpg (952 KB, 1788x2428)
952 KB
952 KB JPG
Listen Here You Little Shit Edition

Post wood (furniture)
Big Rifles
Big Bullets
Froppy Frens Inside

Thread theme ~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HUtwku8R9Q&list=RD1HUtwku8R9Q&start_radio=1

As always; No Jannies, No Trannies
Previously, on X-men: >>64608347
116 replies and 35 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: range day.jpg (2.7 MB, 3200x1494)
2.7 MB
2.7 MB JPG
>>64655249
Hello /br/os, just got back home from visiting family. I hope you all had a merry Christmas. Not a battle rifle, but does anyone ITT own a springfield hellion? I'm thinking about getting one.
>>
>>64688044
Don't own but have shot one. Wasn't impressed desu, LOP was ridiculous, and I'm average height and build. If you have gorilla arms it might be more comfortable.
>>
>>64688107
>LOP was ridiculous
Yeah 16" is pretty long. I tried simulating it with my AR, because 16" is to about where the stock is from the magwell. Not sure if I can get over that. Everything else about it seems great though.
>>
>>64688044
I have the 20" hellion and it's really neat. Just heavy. And they don't sell spare parts.
>>
>>64688275
I saw in a couple of reviews that when dirty they may have issues with the trigger resetting. Did you have any problems with that?

>mogs your puny weak little capitalist bolt locking lugs
99 replies and 23 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64688099
It's because I understand it's a joke that I posted that gif
>>
>>64688099
>underground stew channels
Someone pitch this to congress, this is a gap we absolutely need to close.
>>
File: XCR Bolt.jpg (82 KB, 1600x1042)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
HEY FATTY

YOU ARE FAT
>>
>>64686788
south korea still exists tho
>>
File: IMG_1651.jpg (80 KB, 400x612)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>64687124
>>64687179
An AK bolt can run 50,000+ rounds, AR style bolts suck for longevity. They’re not a generational weapon like older two and three lug weapons.

File: chain wip tank defense.jpg (550 KB, 5704x1478)
550 KB
550 KB JPG
Here is how tanks can win.

The chain doesn't need to be very thick, just strong enough to support a very high RPM, and also collision against drones.

Even if the chain breaks, the spool can just release more chain.

There should be some dynamic counter weight to keep things balanced.
18 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64684913
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb6NS_F5xTE
Why whip around a chain when you can spin a large plate with no gap at all?
>>
there are so many things wrong here I barely even know where to start
>tank flailing its nigger discipliner now fails at being mobile cover for infantry, i.e. its primary role in a combined arms group
>zero top defense against something that can fly, and very precisely at that (see >>64685431 )
>rests on some dogshit pole that has to not only support the retarded contraption but resist it spinning at, per your own words, "very high RPM", plus however fast the "oscillating arm" moves, so at least two different stressors going in two different directions
>device itself is an easy target, no need to target the chain on the first strike like >>64686045 says, just come from above and hit literally any other part, be it the pole, the motor, the arm, the spool... now the tank lost its defense mechanism and we're back to square one for the low low cost of... one extra drone
>severely limited range compared to a bushmaster, a very bad thing for discouraging repeated attempts ("who cares if the first drone missed the tism chain spinner? just send another one, it's not like they can actually do anything about it" vs "shit they spotted us, any other drone that tries again is just gonna get shot down, abort")
and no doubt countless more things I'm forgetting. it doesn't matter how cheap the defense is, it's trying to defend something worth several times more than itself. however much your nigger-rigged system costs, if it fails to defend the several million dollar tank, it still ends up more expensive than properly investing in a good system and its maintenance, even if that system costs several hundred thousand dollars.
>>
Most tanks are used in urban combat so they're practically useless. However they could make a low power AI-guided railgun (1 kilowatt or less) that fires a salvo of magnets at a very rapid rate to shoot down drones trying to approach
>>
This is a really good idea, the top 90 degrees attack could be prevented by adding a spear on the top of the rotating thing.
>>
File: 1766860535913991.jpg (1.24 MB, 5294x3032)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
I finalized OP's design.
If you add a flamethrower at the top. there will be no blind spots for any drone attack.

USSOCOM Replaces EOTech Sights With EOTech Sights
4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64687979
>elcan
peak gunsooming. elcans are cool for cloning or whatever but there are much better sights for less money. you could have gotten a nightforce scope for the price of an elcan, but nooooo elcan is the "kino vibes expensive sight" and thats why you bought it
>>
>>64687990
I've posted my home address multiple times on this board. Come see for yourself
>>64688027
No I bought it because it's fucking awesome and it'll survive the recoil impulse of my SCAR 17.
>>
>>64687948
>>64687952
I thought EO TECHs had failure issues breaking after use.
>>
>>64688278
Eotechs had a thermal drift issue that came to light in 2016. They could shift as far as 4MOA from a room temp zero if exposed to the extremes of -40F or 122F degrees. Not a real issue for 99.9% of private users but a problem for a SOCOM optic. The issue has been fixed in models designed after this was found, but the gun community loves to take and hold hyperbolic stances.
Eotechs have less battery life than Aimpoints. Modern Eotechs say they have 1000 hours at setting 12, though the anecdotes commonly say it is closer to 600. That's not nothing, but it does mean you have to stay on top of it compared to Aimpoints with their five digit battery lives.
Eotechs are pretty sturdy. Obviously you can find examples of destroyed ones- stuff gets destroyed in combat, but they aren't especially fragile.
For a special operations CCO they work well with NODS and magnifiers so not the worst choice as long as you stay on top of the battery situation, which I'm sure SOCOM thinks they can manage
>>
>>64688337
Well wasn't there also an issue with delamination a few years back? I haven't heard anything since so it may be like the AUGsplosions and a result of coof-era quality

when i was growing up my parents would only let me have a zip .22
>>
>>64688047
Was it for .gov handouts for families with fingerless kids?
>>
When I was growing up we had to walk 2 miles to the range, one way, in the snow. All these spoiled millenials these days don't know how good they have it.
>>
>>64688047
Liar.

File: guardian spear.png (685 KB, 2539x529)
685 KB
685 KB PNG
is there a way to make it work?
30 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>64687630
bolt shells do use rocket propulsion so they don't need long barrels
>>
>>64687639
That is what they say but they use propellant all the same.
This is just a oversight of the artists who do for the rule of cool, but if they have casings they have propellent
>>
>>64687649
i know. i also think they added casings because of gyrojet's poor muzzle velocity irl
>>
>>64687661
They added casings because it looks and sounds cool. Same reason reason the bullets are rocket propelled, the gyro jet sucked nigger balls, but it sounds badass
>>
>>64686950
shotgun would have too much spread, and could cause colateral casualties

File: India.png (489 KB, 1058x633)
489 KB
489 KB PNG
We have nuclear powered subs.
Why dont we have nuclear powered surface ships besides carriers?
Also, how much supplies are flown in for carriers out at sea? Is it a constant stream of helis just carrying supplies? Where does the supplies come from? The pacific is pretty fucking far from America.
33 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: .png (1.81 MB, 860x3600)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB PNG
>>64686567
>Also, how much supplies are flown in for carriers out at sea?
why ignore subs? those need supplies, too.
>>
>>64686644
those are USN problems due to pork barreling.
French Navy just uses civilian reactors on their SSN. French CVN then gets SSN reactors.
>>
>>64686611
>so they overengineered it
Not exactly. Rickover was legendarily conservative with his approach to design. When the Navy decided that it wanted a nuclear carrier, he insisted that they build it just like a conventional one...but with reactors instead of boilers. Conventional carriers had 8 boilers, so Enterprise got 8 reactors.

As it turned out, this wasn't a great idea for a variety of reasons, so the Nimitz class got a pair of A4W's instead.

> I bet the motherfucker would have hit 60 knots
Don't back that bet with money unless it's money that you want to lose. Memes aside, she made about the same amount of power as a Kitty Hawk and had a far heavier displacement. Nimitz makes almost as much shaft horsepower and displaces less. The sea stories of Enterprise doing amazing things are just that...sea stories. She was fast, but not significantly faster than what came before or after. When Westinghouse designed the A2W, they did so with the knowledge that 8 of them would be going into a carrier as a one-for-one replacement for existing boilers and that's what they designed for.
>know the difference between a sea story and a fairy tale?
>a fairy tale begins with, "once upon a time..."
>a sea story begins with, "this ain't no bullshit..."
>>
File: 1755417281282918.jpg (49 KB, 454x328)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>64686575
>Enterprise with SCANFAR antennas and the funky ECM hat
>>
This might be too vague and childish a question but if they ever iron out that "fusion reactor in a cargo container" type design, would it be seen in smaller ships because it's not as hazardous as a fission reactor?

I do grasp the outside of how open ended and asinine this question is (what if they invent magic?) because they don't have fusion reactors at all yet, but what also crosses my mind is how, say, an iPhone has an unspeakably complex and powerful CPU in it and they spam them by the millions to be operated by coons. Since there's no nasty uranium or giant lead shields involved could some plausible future reactor, say, get stuffed in every Burke sized ship?

File: elf with an ak.jpg .jpg (215 KB, 850x1024)
215 KB
215 KB JPG
Around elves, relax yourselves.

Previous thread: >>64677931
>image limit reached

https://github.com/rcc11/4chan-sounds-player
>with this handy script installed you'll occasionally hear what sounds like elves singing, but it's actually just Finnish
171 replies and 91 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1000010166.jpg (380 KB, 1200x968)
380 KB
380 KB JPG
>>64688074
It all ends soon enough.
>>64688186
Current gen robots don't look like humans though. Unless we are talking about different things here.
>>64688207
That's what you would want to focus on? A cock?
Kinda gay anon.
>>
>>64688236
Not just any cock, my cock specifically, you telling me you don't get turned on by just watching yourself jerking off in a mirror?
>>
File: 1700411103908808.png (224 KB, 401x440)
224 KB
224 KB PNG
>>64688258
>you telling me you don't get turned on by just watching yourself jerking off in a mirror?
Yes
>>
>>64688283
Lmao, learn to love yourself anon
>>
File: 1668438333798354.jpg (74 KB, 736x736)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>64688305
No, and stop being a faggot.


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.