/arg/ tard containmentArgueRepeatGunsoomOld>>62758898
I just don’t like eotechs
Pastebinhttps://rentry.org/sa6c4mSummary>>62745548
>>62765383I used toThen my vz58 zero moved about 1.5ft
Good morning assault rifle 15 general. I hope you all have a happy FF
It's Friday, it should be FF Edition thread
>>62765376What smoke grenade can I buy that's actually worth it?
I side with the Furmen because their presence on /arg/ is stronger than the Animecians
>>62765398ATF banned them all unless you get a pyrotechnic license. a2 used to post smoke-making guide but i think he stopped for (fed) reasons
>>62765376>page 3Jesus christ you faggot slow the fuck down. Been quiet for a long time but some of you are such cancer it's hard to remain.
>>62765417ATF only banned specific models
>>62765422Raw (sewage)
>>62765423yeah, the ones actually worth a shit.
>>62765398M18s off GunBroker for $300 each
>>62765422You’d think someone who doesn’t even shoot but still spends tens of thousands on gunsooming to seek validation from (Yous) would at least have something cool
>>62765422this is the worst paint job I've ever seen
>>62765428EG18X is basically the same as the MIL-X but with a wire pull instead. They’re unironically fine.
>>62765419Calm your tits>>62765392>>62765394>>62765403>.>Go back>>62765398I miss grenade-anons hijinks
>>62765446wire pulls will always be less reliable due to the potential for operator error. and that one isnt waterproof so it's stupid to put on your kitairsoft-match tier
>>62765398The enola gaye mil-x were awesome but they got ATF’d. enola gaye still makes some pull string ones that are fine.
>>62765392AI is getting so realistic it’s soon going to be almost impossible to tell what videos are fake or real.
Anyone ever use rearden for hub cans?
>>62765477Lol
>>62765502Just give it 5 years anon
>>62765502Go check on the Facebook boomers they believe everything
>>62765502When I’m gooning to an indistinguishably realistic AI trump x kamala tape I’ll have the last laugh.
For the anon who asked about Geissele HBAR uppers
>>62765513For me it’s AOC
>>62765522Nigga he responded last thread
>>62765522Chat, be honest, are these retarded?
>>62765530>I need a heavy barrel for a semi auto rifle I will never use to make youtube goyslop meltdown videos
>>62765522The rail sucks, I hate flat bar triggers and their prone to snapping, they have had issues with the chrome flaking on their barrels in the past, I like the b5 stock
>>62765527Oh. I missed it sorry
>>62765545>theiryes you totally seem like a high IQ and informed man
>>62765522i hope they put THICK gas tubes on them or it's all pointless. agree with the flat trigger thing.
>>62765530Less barrel whip, possibly more consistent or less severe heat stringing, overall more accurate barrel potential. Also some ban states require hbar so you can't install le ebil grenade launcher or bayonet. Honestly it's not necessary for spr unless you're literally splitting hairs. Any well made and lapped taper barrel will work fine, as G$ already showed.
>>62765567Whatever fgt I’m at work I’m not paying attention to 4chan I know the difference between their, there, and they’re. Your just butthurt cuz I’m a bendy bill hater because he’s a little spergy fgt who gets mogged by mark
>>62765587Oh shit I did it again!!!! I said your instead of you’re I guess that totally invalidates what I said o fuck!!!!
>>62765571They do, and flat triggers are gay
>>62765579when i was noob i thought thick barrels were retarded for AR15's. but since everyone is free floating these days barrel rigidity is way more important. especially since everyone is also suppressing which makes the barrel wobble/harmonics problem even worse. most dudes will shoot a 5 shot group from cold and think everything is fine. ive seen a lot of guns that heatstring horribly or go to 6MOA after 2 mags.
>>62765587>YourYou're so triggered by Bill you can't even type straight. Go to bed mark
>>62765612Gotta defend muh shitty trendy purchase because I fucked up and shoulda bought a bcm blem or dd
>>62765631No need to say "BCM blem" you can just say BCM. G$ has the decency to charge less for blems at least
>>62765639Bcm does to you fucking retard, you would know that if you took bills cocknout of your mouth and didn’t just buy what Reddit told you
>>62765631>paying more for a worse barrel and less efficient gas systemlol
>>62765668>cocknoutis that like coffee or something?
>>62765684I’ll take Dsa,bcm bfh, fn, or dd barrels over bendy barrels any day
this place is still exactly the same
>>62765383Okay so I'm conflicted. I used to HATE eotechs, vehemently. The thermal drift shit, the lying about the thermal drift shit, the not fixing the thermal drift shit, the thermal drift cope card... The size, the weight, the COST. Can't switch reticles, battery life SUCKS. They're not that durable. But now that I'm prioritizing passive NVG aiming more, they're more attractive. IMO the Holosun AEMS does really really well both objectively and for its pricepoint for passive NVG aiming, but the Eotech is just slightly better. What really has me thinking Eotech now is that I got a G45 magnifier. I like it, simple as, BUT the AEMS dot is a pretty shitty mess under magnification, and the messy dot feels like the main limit to POA precision when using the AEMS and G45 combination. I looked at my EXPS 3-4 which is on my SBS VP12 shotgun through the G45, and I was very pleased with how much more precise the POA is with the Eotech dot vs the AEMS.Is the more previse POA under magnification, and the slightly better passive NVG performance worth the size, weight, reduced battery life, non-switchable reticles, reduced reliability and durability, and the increased cost?I really don't know. >>62765587>I'm not paying attention to grammar nor spelling If correct grammar and spelling aren't legitimately a matter of passive consideration in your mind, then you are indeed low IQ. >mogged by markOkay maybe you're actually just a poet>>62765706Some things are as old as time
>>62765597Should take that cold bore shot, dump the mag in the berm, then shoot 4 more. See where you're really at.
>>62765705You could, but I wouldn't
>>62765712Eotechs are one of the things which sound stupid on paper until you actually use them.
>>62765597I’ve seen this. SPRs should have a heavy barrel imo. I wish the KACs profile was a bit heavier but I haven’t had any issues with it stringing.
>>62765706Same as it ever was, same as it ever wasSame as it ever was, same as it ever wasSame as it ever was, same as it ever wasSame as it ever was, same as it ever was
Anyone here have a Velos K? Wondering how it performs on 10.3
https://youtu.be/QLfAd6aG9FE is this the average AR-15 and competition enjoyer in 2024?
>>62765735I wouldn’t. The difference in flash performance between the full size and K is nuts. The K is very flashy while the full size is literally better than an RC2. If you want something around K sized on a 10.3-11.5 look at the CAT WB otherwise get the full sized velos.
>>62765735Velos K is probably a solid choice can based off of all the reviews I've seen and read, especially if you're already into ASR. It is a bit heavy though. Check out the CAT WB, and also I just learned about these the other day, FOR Systems Monarch Recce Inconel. I haven't used or heard or shot or held ANY of these cans, but they seem solid in terms of what I'm seeing/reading on the interbutts. >>62765726All barrels should be fluted IMO>>62765725It is conflicting for sure. >>62765730How is Arizona? Did you know New Mexico literally has the lowest average IQ of any state in the ENTIRE union? And that is with Intel, Los Alamos, Sandia, AFRL, and the Air Force base inflating the numbers...
>>62765743Can you not, please
>>62765763I think that one is an actual woman
>>62765712Why not a t2? Tbh I’d use an sro with a jagerworx shroud thing before I’d use an eotech
>>62765769Eh. T2s aren't bad. Not my favorite. Expensive, and the "frame" of the window, the housing and the battery/brightness knob, occludes a fair bit of the FOV, plus the glass isn't the most color neutral, not that the AEMS is better. >sro with jagerworx shroudInteresting take. Why would you take that over an Eotech? Eotech reliability?SRO certainly is going to give you the best "floating dot" look.
>>62765761monarch recce performs almost exactly the same as the CAT WB I could barely tell the difference.
>>62765712>roland special in 2024cmon wuggy you can do better than that
>>62765398Anon, we need to cookGet your notebook ready>>62765769Because he cant make a good decision
>>62765705okay
>>62765761Why not an 8T? Sigger memes aside it’s a better red dot than the eotech
how do you do fellow tripod enjoyers
>>62765790>8tGo go gadget forward reflection target indicator>>62765792Good leg choice desu
>>62765780You heard both? That is super cool, really. On what hosts? Do tell more. The Monarch Recce is lighter than shorter than the WB I believe, plus I like the feel of the company a lot more. >>62765783I think I've got nearing 15k rounds through my two iterations of Roland specials and I like em, simple as. Am curious though, what are you thinking these days for "sidearm"? >>62765785>A2 pre covfefe bullysmdh>>62765790>sigger memes asideNo such thing. There is no redeeming of sig. >>62765792>roach spray and alcohol pottery
>>62765790That's just a holomeme 512 in a box tho
>>62765712i think eotechs are fine, my only issue with them has been weight and the fact that they auto-off which is bad for a bedside gun. But for NV theyre great, even better than a T2. and theyre the only truly viable way to run a magnifier imo.
>>62765712>>62765725The T2 is better for NV passive aiming and I am willing to die on this hill.>eotech gives you a massive 68 moa ring with a dot inside of it that obscures targets >T2 is a simple dot Passive aiming is also very finicky. The dot might look good then you put it over a target and it washes out completely. The EOtech requires you to fuck around with the up/down buttons which you can't see and are hard to manipulate if you're wearing gloves. The T2 just gives you a basic dial. You turn it towards you or away from you there's nothing to fuck up and it won't kick you out of NV mode into daylight mode if you press the wrong thing. Take the battery life out of it because both are long enough that it's a dumb thing to care about. CR123s aren't hard to come by and it's not hard to change a battery. If someone can't handle routine battery maintenance their opinion is irrelevant.The T2 is still >significantly lighter>significantly easier to adjust brightness on the fly >doesn't change zero based on temperature >better for night vision use >a way more practical and less annoying reticle to deal with>more versatile as it can be used as a secondary sighting system on a prism/scope set upTry both and make your own opinion but in my experience with using both I will likely never go back to the eotech because it doesn't offer me any benefits whatsoever to the T2
>>62765778No tint, barely visible frame, actually looks good under magnifier, light weight, I don’t mind open emitters on rifles ymmv, I trust the durability of it with the shroud as much as anything shy of an aimpoint/elcan/acog, the glass isn’t gonna delam
>>62765743Gonna have to watch this later
>>62765811>weightReally>>62765828Eokek big windowThat's the only advantage for passive
>>62765828Tbh less glass surface on t2 also a nicer experience.>MUH GLASS CLARITY MUDDAFUKKAYou know whats even more clear than eotech glass that has been spattered with mud and shit all day? Nothing at allT2 is based and so is this post, case closed.>>62765838>muh window muddafukkkkkaRetard alert
>>62765761>How is Arizona? Like anywhere else, there's parts that are super nice and some areas that are trash. Overall it's pretty good. Phoenix is growing a lot which kinda blows, but means consistent work. Lots of ranges, and areas to shoot in the desert 30minutes from the city.
>>62765450I take one (1) day out of the week (not even as OP) and your reaction is "Go back"? I've had it with this unfair treatment
>>62765805Both on the same 11.5 using rearden hub mount. They perform about the same when it comes to sound and backpressure but I know for a fact the CAT WB does spectacularly with flash while I haven’t seen the monarch recce at night yet.
>>62765838>Really11.2 ounces for a red dot. thats almost acog weight
>>62765811>only truly viable way to run a magnifierYeah I think I'm starting to think similar, especially for a higher magnification magnifier, 4x or 5x. >auto-off which is bad for a bedside gunGood point actually>weightHonestly not my biggest gripe with them. My biggest gripe is reliability and durability>>62765828>T2 better for NV passiveBetter than what? An eotech? Why? The ring obscuring is a fair point, but when it comes to obscuring targets, the T2 housing isn't great either >Buttons vs dialFair point. Adjusting dot brightness during passive NVG is definitely important. I haven't messed with my EXPS brightness settings while under NVG wearing gloves. I have with the AEMS and it is definitely a bitch. >routine battery maintenance Confirmed not fantasizing about SHTF enough, but not an unfair point. ">significantly lighter>significantly easier to adjust brightness on the fly>doesn't change zero based on temperature>better for night vision use>a way more practical and less annoying reticle to deal with>more versatile as it can be used as a secondary sighting system on a prism/scope set up"Good points, really>>62765834Fugg. It is hard to say. I need to get another EXPS anyway for a CQBR "Block 2.5" build so I can try it on that. >>62765857Very cool, thanks
>>62765854I appreciate your work, pastebinanon
>>62765761>all barrels should be fluted I agree with that statement. I’m amazed more don’t esp seeing KAC has begun to dimple their barrels
>>62765785The last time I tried to make smoke I was 13 years old and bought salt peter from the CVS pharmacist. The pot overheated and ignited the mix sending molten sugar all over my arm. General idea is perforated copper tube down the middle and ignition from the bottom up, correct? Where to source canisters and pull pin tops?
>>62765877Simple cost of mfg>>62765867>the T2 housing isn't great eitherTotal area of NV obscured is greater on eotech. The fabled "big window" + housing is significantly larger area than > Tiny T2 window + housing (duh). In a clean room yes the glass makes marginal difference, but bad news bro you outside.Strongest point for eotech is the aiming point that approaches infinity but it becomes hard to modulate for precision with the 65moa retard ring around it.
>>62765874Thanks, KC~
>>62765897thats why you buy the single-dot model eotechs. not the ring reticle eotechs
>>62765867I really don’t understand clone builds, I just wanna roll my own to suit my needs (which are really just wants)
>>62765834Mud will come to visit your open emitter>>62765842A bigger window is a bigger windowThat's the only redeeming quality
>>62765922It’s all about getting raw operator cred and getting to call everything that isn’t some gwot clone a reddit build
>>62765867>...but when it comes to obscuring targets, the T2 housing isn't great either nigga have you ever used nods? there is no visible housing > I haven't messed with my EXPS brightness settings while under NVG wearing gloves.yeah wait until you do it's fucking retarded. The most useful aspect of training with nods is nothing to do with learning your LAM holds at 10y and everything to do with finding out how much something sucks to use in the dark and then fixing it or replacing it with something that doesn't. >Confirmed not fantasizing about SHTF enough, but not an unfair point. In the time it takes for le boogaloo meme to manifest you could spend so much time training with any red dot that you memorized the reticle and holds and don't even need a battery anymore.>Yeah I think I'm starting to think similar, especially for a higher magnification magnifier, 4x or 5x. Turn the brightness down / adjust diopter and if that's still not good enough for you then just accept the reality that it's bad practice to pick the inferior red dot which you are using 95% of the time by itself so you can have a slightly less shitty experience when using the magnifier the other 5% of the time. Also, just use a G33
>>62765915That's why you just get a T2 instead of taking 3 lefts to make a right
>>62765944I would want an open emitter on a holstered/concealed handgun but I’ve never had an issue with them outside of a fucking blizzard and all I had to do was wipe it off. I don’t know what’s wrong with me but I think I like shooting in fucked up weather more than a nice sunny day
>>62765953>magnifiermost red dots blob out or just perform like shit under magnification. even the t2 is kinda mid. eokek does work better with a magnifier. magnifiers cockblock passing aiming even when folded down so i dont use them.
>>62765712>switchable reticleGod you're such a fucking joke.
>>62765894>Sugar mixAll sugar based smokes (milx, iwa , taggin, etc) are wholly inferior chemical compositions that are literally only for toy smoke grenades anon. They sell you it because its much harder to die of inhaling sugar smoke in an enclosed space. The hot nature of sugar and fast burn rate gives you a wispy smoke that wants to blow up and away almost immedaitely. Fucking TERRIBLE for screening. Airsoft smokes are airsoft optic tier.Proper M8/M18s use/used HC (Hexachloroethane) rather than sugar base. Pro of HC is that it pulls moisture out of the air around you to make the mixture cooler and more dense. HC sits over the ground like a thick peasoup fog and is blowing. Now the downside of HC is that when inhaled it will react with the water in your lungs and form acid resulting in you dying in an enclosed space. Like couple people die every other year from setting off an M18 indoors and just zonking out. As a solution a lot are moving to TA based smoke which burns Terephthalic Acid over a simple oxidizer. Resulting smoke is basically just CO and formaldehyde but is drastically thicker. Cooking up TA is also a lot easier and safer in home lab quantities. Housing wise its shrimple. You print a PETG housing and line it with an ablative cardboard tubing inner. Think section of poster tube within a plastic can. Prime and strike with a simple mechanism to some doped time fuse. Easy ignition and production fully inhouse vs relying on surplus/fired housings from gunbroker.>>62765944it shrimply isnt. Bigwindow posting originated from PVS14 mounted behind the optic allowing for a greater FOV thru the PVS14 than the M68 CCO it was replacing.You doing that?
>>62765974There's no way around magnifiers not sucking and I just don't see how a slightly less worse experience with the magnifier which really shouldn't be used that much anyway justifies having a much worse experience the vast majority of the using the dot as intended. If we are caring so much for low/intermediate magnification then red dot wasn't the right choice and we should consider other options.
>>62765973Wouldnt***
>>62765790Technically true because the eotech is not a red dot iz a lay-sir>>62765799They don't know what that means. They don't know it's a selling point on the eotech, they also sit in their room look at the reticle and complain that it looks fuzzy.
>>62765990It's easier to passive through a bigger windowIt just changes the skill floorThe rest of it is a mess with the huge ring obscuring the target
>>62766016Do you often have issues lining the red dot up with your head during the day?
>>62765973i had a open emitter holosun508T for awhile, it was on a G17 and whenever it rained, the dot would fill with water. it wouldnt work until i shook it out. i think open emitter is best for CCW's. Definitely not for open carry though>>62765999most people who think magnifiers suck ass, used either a standard red dot, or used a cheap magnifier. the only time they objectively suck is in bad weather because you have a quad lens stack that amplifies the mist/fogging problem.
>>62766031NoLenses being offset from your face 4" can introduce a parallax factor
>>62766049>Parallax from nodsReally anon? You line your head up with the dot by looking at the red dot? Close your eyes, bring the rifle up and then open your eyes. Where does it end up?If its not centered on your eye you have an actual training/skill issue and need to hit the range. If it is centered, why are you worried about a big window? You would never accept "heh just gotta move the ol head around, maybe get some new irons that are physically larger!" on a pistol draw stroke. Why are you doing it on a rifle ?
>>62765376Had a round that was extra spicy and shot out a huge fire ball and now my rifle wont group at 50 yards.
Reptilia aug or badger comm (both in 1.7)
>>62766071>skill issueIt's a bigger windowIt makes passive easierThat's it
>>627661001.5 comm>>62766101If youre fucking up, youre fucking upBut by all means attempt to hardware your way out of it.Big window posters the kind of retards to be dot focused
>>62766114Let me guess, you thing big windows on handgun red dots are a meme too?
>>62766100Geissele blem next week
>>62766134They absolutely are
>>62766143Look we get it you don’t shoot comps
>>62765877Saved image>a very stumpy finKek. Look at this picture of this "fluted" Deadshot barrel. No thanks. >>62765897Total area greater but that total area is further from the important real estate. Also I'm not 100% sure but I think with a basic ray optics analysis you can argue that the larger area window allows more light into the tube that is right behind the optic, at least more light of interest that is coming from around/near the target.>>62765922Clone builds are about fun and aesthetics and history. At their worst they're about "stamp collecting". I like both cloning and modern optimized builds with zero attention paid to aesthetics. >>62765953>no visible housingThere is the blurry outline of housing, and the area down range that is obscured by said blurry outline. On a T2 that blurry outline is closer to the target area of interest, and on an Eotech that blurry window frame is further away from the target area of interest. On an SRO that blurry window frame basically goes to zero area because the frame is so thin. >LAM holds at 10yYeah I don't care much about this>sucks to use in the darkI agree entirely, this is the main thing you're learning. >turn brightness downTurned it way way down, still messy. If it is 95% vs 5% then yeah who cares about the messy dot under magnification, but it might not necessarily be 95/5. Might be 50/50. I simply don't know. >>62765974> magnifiers cockblock passing aiming even when folded down so i dont use them.I was messing with this the other evening. It definitely bumps, but IMO IME it wasn't unusable. That being said as you NOD up, you could easily QD the magnifier off.
I need tripod reccs
>>62766114>dot focused>skill issue>etcNot sure how many times we have to go in circles on this. The larger the optic, the bigger cone you've got to work around "skill issues" and awkward positions. The dot I normally use for passive is even smaller than T2. It's simple physics that a bigger window gives you better flexibility for passive.
>>62766100Badger for sure>>62766143>>62766134On a handgun they help a ton>>62766162Also I believe that in terms of light collection, the larger aperture legitimately increases brightness of the target area
>>62766154>Total area greater but that total area is further from the important real estateExactly, who gives a shit about it ? >>62766134Give me the enclosed emitter>>62766175>Also I believe that in terms of light collection, the larger aperture legitimately increases brightness of the target areaIts still a red dot wugger, you should still seek target focus with superimposed reticle drifting across it.
Window size doesn’t matter much on a rifle since you have additional points of contact that let you maintain consistent positioning behind the red dot. On a handgun you do not so when doing dynamic shooting it’s easier to lose the red dot. A2 will argue against this.
>>62766114>recommends badger>posts reptiliaA2 pls
>>62766162>ot sure how many times we have to go in circles on this/arg/ will never accept that personal preferences exist
>>62765805Probably a sig shill or pdp flavor of the month fashion victim, glock is eternal.
>running open emitter outside of adult day care (indoor range)oh I thought it was just a meme
Is the rcr approved by A2
>>62766187/arg/ prefers 2D over 3D women
>>62766200probably
>>62766195People have been running RMRs on ACOGs outside for years and it's fine.
>>62766200Absolutely not because it actually works. I approve it though. Does my approval mean anything to you?
>>62766201And dead ones apparently
>>62766201>arg are tranniesAlways have been
>>62766200>it’s bad because uhhh tint and uhhhh the mounting system just buy an acro mine is perfectly fineThere I saved him from responding.
>>62765915The thing that wasn't available until like two years ago that thing? Dumbass.Inb4 muh special special special forces had it a long time ago in small numbers for a short time!
Are competition shooters all retards?They've all got those bigass SROs and 507comps and shit
>>62766162You can get betterYou cant make the eotech less shitty no matter how hard you try>>62766183>A2 will argue against this.Who are you quoting?>>62766195Its difficult man.>>62766200it’s bad because uhhh tint and uhhhh the mounting system just buy an acro
>>62766234>just buy an acroThere's no way A2 actually said this
>>62766228I see anons lusting over anime waifus and furries yet I don’t bat an eye. I see KCanon lusting over a dead woman and it creeps me out. idk why I’m like this.
>>62766100Whichever one you find at the best price first. Rooftop had a 70$ discount on the reptilia a while back
>>62766187>a bunch of autists rigidly adhere to notions of objective truth and the meaninglessness of impermanent subjective preferenceYes, exactly why I love it here>>62766195I believe eotech while indeed scoop time, is a closed emitter >>62766188>glock is eternal I was sorely tempted to try a PDP but then I watched a few review where people were like yea, this shoots like shit, so I skipped it>>62766182Okay consider an argument from the absurd: We know from red dots of olde that you can have a truly and completely occluded red dot window, so long as there is still the precise POA given by the dot, and then use the non-dominant eye to provide the rest of the information. This works. We also know that it is inferior to having an actual window that the dominant eye can see through. Less mentally taxing, less emphasis and reliance placed upon the superimposition process in the mind. Now lets go further along the spectrum, I think we can agree that a magical floating red dot with ZERO occlusion from any sort of window or window frame would be the most ideal, and afford the least amount of reliance on mental superimposition etc etcI am arguing that while completely occluded works, it is the most inferior, and while completely un-occluded is impossible, it is the most superior, so that we ought to seek a red dot solution that is further towards the impossible but wholly superior state than the possible and wholly inferior end of the spectrum. For real an SRO thing with a closed emitter and a vibranium hood would be good. The new Holosun 507 Competition thing or the RMR HD all show that there is a big preference for window frames that are further from the center of the window. >>62766183No A2 is arguing in favor of this. >>62766238Really gets noggin joggin
>>62766238They're just minmaxxing for a specific task. And that task is shooting a maximum of 300 rounds in one day, with a pampered rifle under controlled conditions, as fast as possible.
>>62766247>>62766255A2 will argue that a larger window on a pistol red dot is a bad thing
>>62766247>Who are you quoting?He didn't quote anyone, anon...
>>62766255>a bunch of autists rigidly adhere to notions of objective truth and the meaninglessness of impermanent subjective preference>Yes, exactly why I love it hereExcept the objective truth consensus has been that you are retarded for roughly a decade. Sure about that one, champ?
>>62766247I was trying to save you from having to respond and you did it anyways why are you like this?
>>62766209They didn't have options really. You don't get it. If soldiers had the options we have now your meta would probably look very different.
>>62766280if open emitters sucked as much dick as all the literal paid shills in this thread say, they would have failed as a product ten fucking years ago
I WILL piggyback a 508t on my acog and I WILL be happy
>>62766255SRO, 507c, Vortex XL popularity is all about dot tracking on competition handguns. for anything outside of the flat range keeping a handgun smaller is a good thing as is closed emitter.
>>62766284>thing bad means thing will failClearly you dont understand the gun marketP320 has been shooting people for almost that long now but here we are.>>62766293Gold star post.
>>62766284I mean seriously, you are pretty fucked regardless if you are fully submerging your primary and secondary optic in fucking mud, and even if you are it's probably fucking raining so you can get some water and clean them off, otherwise, if your emitter truly is fucked, the glass on your optic is too. How the fuck do you get the mud out of the RCR front window if it's just been fucking dunked? How do you get it off your front and rear objective on your primary optic? how do you get it out of your ARD?fuck, why is everyone turning as fucking retarded as wuggy?
>>62766255>I am arguing that while completely occluded works, it is the most inferior,I agree with wuggy, while seeing the red dot is easy enough, actually being able to see your target through a pvs14 is a pain in the ass with a t2 they aren't clear enough and aren't large enough for enough light to come through for passive aiming when its dark out
>>62765725I had the opposite experienceIt looked cool, then I actually used it and it broke>>62765973>>62766036>>62766187>>62766209>>62766255>>62766284>>62766285Eventually, the mud/rain/snow monster comes to visit
If an RMR gets foggy, you wipe it off. If an acro gets foggy you can’t wipe it off ;)
>>62766309congratulations, you poured muddy water on your rifle and took a picture of it
>>62766293>for anything outside of the flat range keeping a handgun smaller is a good thing as is closed emitterwhich is why I run iron sights on my handgun
>>62766293Open emitters tend to be smaller than closed ones thoughever
I just think mailboxes are ugly, simple as
>>62766252I mean, at least she was real once, right?
>>62766303>I mean seriously, you are pretty fucked regardless if you are fully submerging your primary and secondary opticGo outside
>509t>EPS carry>RCRThose are your options. Acro P2 is a dud.>first one fogged >second one had black pieces of something (sealant or plastic) scattered all over inside after under 100 rounds>third one got sold on tacswap Blows my mind how the company that makes the best rifle dot on earth can put out such a piece of shit joke.
>>62766304Oh that’s crazy because I was doing it last night with no issues.Have you actually done this yourself or are you just repeating what someone said or wrote on the internet?
>>62766352okay and
>>62766317That's not what we do here
Only thing I’m going to give credit for is aimpoint support they handled everything super fast. Doesn’t change that this thing is a flaming turd.
>>62766366you can tell from the pattern of the mud on there than you poured it over the top of the rifle, how fucking retarded are you?
>>62766353Sig Romeo-X Enclosed Pro exists now and it pretty solid. It's DPP footprint though.
>>62766362Touch grass>>62766353The seethe is real
>>62766372Are you new?
>>62766386explain that splatter pattern (how mud trickled from the top of the rifle to the bottom (from optic to magazine) without you having poured mud on it to make it look like you were being all hardcore or whatever
>>62766384so you shoved snow in your optic? and?
>>62766403He does this often, he just walks around his yard and adds mud to his rifle
>>62766403>Anon discovers gravity
>>62766411Not true, he lets his gf dribble the mud on because she's more artistically inclined. He just watches
fuck, guys, I dropped my rifle and now there's an emitter in my emitter!
>>62766403Jfc
>>62766413when was the last time mud magically fell on you from above? Mud is on the ground.
>>62766419How was he able to get a 2d woman to enter the real world and sprinkle mud all over his rifle?
>>62766403Yes anon, I'm going to go 39 miles into the back country to pour mud on my rifle>>62766411>>62766419>>62766429Kekd
>>62766451Your yard isn't 39 miles bud, you wouldn't be able to cuddle Elliot if you left your house so you are lying.
>>62766441imagine if you will, not keeping it on the ground afterwards
>>62766420>fuck, guysNo thanks faggot
>>62766429Does he have legend of zelda tattoos? Would make sense
>>62766496Yes and he has Rick and Morty tattoo and Star Trek.
>>62766555This is the first time I’ve ever believed you.
>>62766252Averi is for pets, not lust
>>62765392>>62766583I would leave my wife for a furry woman if they existed unironically
In the past year I bought 7 cans and I still want more.
>>62766593Just go to italy or portugal
>>62766612I'm gonna buy so many cans when Trump removes them from the NFA
>>62766612>7Wtf are you doing anon. I've bought three, but they have no overlap in capability. I'm considering a fourth, but only because I want a lightweight titanium option for when I don't care about sparking under NODs. Considering a B&T PrintX 5.56 (long version).
>>62765502Faggot, it is 2024, the transformer paper was published in 2017.In 7 years we went from lab demonstrations of AI "capabilities" with pictures that resemble those "you can't name a single object in this picture" pictures to passable hentai generators.You don't know what we will have in the next 7 years.
>>62766386>It was actually a gay cerakote the whole time
>>62766625It’s just not the same.>>62766626They would all be OOS for months.
>>62766594>>62766593>>62766583You 'people' are unironically deranged, and your lack of shame about presenting it is a sure sign of even worse things to come.
>>62766652whatever you say
>>62766645Stick to talking about your ecelebs and Ar15s, pal.
>>62766626>Bans bumpstocks again and super safeties tooNothin personnel
>>62766625I want a hairy greasy Italian wife who yells at me and cooks
>>62765506>>62766645>2 more weeks
>>62766668>we'll take the cans first and go through due process second
>>62766678ugh>>https://medium.com/@junehao/comparing-ai-generated-images-two-years-apart-2022-vs-2024-6c3c4670b905
Damn I didn't know /arg/ had jeets too, they really are like roaches
>>62766638>(long version).Thats really long bro I wouldnt do that
>>62766711May we see one sir?
anyone uses that to check their barrels?
>>62765545you are full of shit, on all counts, nigger. even worse, i bet you are noguns
>>62766719But muh dbs, it's not THAT long...
>>62766779Anon that was like 3 hours ago, why are you still seething?
>>62766819>arguing retards general
>>62766855We can be better than this
>>62766779I’m right about everything your gay too
>>62766868Not me
>>62766891>youroh it's this retard again
>>62766994I did it for u baby ;)
It's just fun bros.
>>62766994>not using a comma after an interjection at the start of a sentenceesl i see
>>62767058>lowercase i good morning saar!
>>62767098That's just what zoomers do
>>62765867>receiver plate QD pointIt's pretty funny how they go unused in every photograph or video of them after 2016, but removing them isn't worth the trouble of restaking or risk of damaging the castle nut ratchet>>62766594>>62766659Thanks for the reup, my Averi folder had been depleted>>62766652Quit being so dramatic
>>62766361Are you shooting a neon target at 15yds? Dark target on dark dirt is hard to see and even harder through a tiny tubeUsing a t2 is doable but you get way less light through the optic compared to an eotech.
fde scope mount on an all black rifle, yes or no?
>>62767124Yes, you can add FDE furniture later (stock, grip, panels, etc)
>>62766366Now this is imageboard posting!>>62766269I don't think he would say it is a bad thing, but he might say it isn't so important so as to excuse buying anything but a P2.>>62766293Closed emitter I agree is important. And too large for other constraints like holster or snag risk is a good point. That being said a ruggedized closed emitter dot with the FOV of the SRO would run circles around the P2 or 509T etc. >>62766304>not clear enough and aren't large enoughExactly>>62766378>sig anything>pretty soldNot at all>>62766451Ignore anon. He's seeing things in the mud splatter pattern that scare him. >marmot fightI've seen em go at it at 12k feet in Colorado. They're nasty little fuckers fr fr>>62766612I have 4 and definitely want more. >>62766638PrintX 5.56 C is likely to be solid for ya>>62767039I used to lust after these then I fired one and holy shit it doesn't feel very good IMO. Pretty sure it was an A3 as well.
>>62767135unsubscribe
>>62767135> Closed emitter I agree is important. And too large for other constraints like holster or snag risk is a good point. That being said a ruggedized closed emitter dot with the FOV of the SRO would run circles around the P2 or 509T etcYou know, that’s kinda crazy there’s basically one of those in your pic
>>62767098im not on trial here pajeet
>>62767135They fought for like 5 minutes, was pretty entertaining and I've never heard them do squeaks like that
>>62767106>Quit being so dramaticJust being real. Didn't mean to put a rat in your facecage.>>62767135>Not at allYeah I get it, there are lots of reasons to shit on Sig and many of them are valid, besides being a meme to boot. The Romeo X Pro is actually without issues though so far as I can tell. Broken clock right twice a day or something.>>62767135>doesn't feel very good IMO.Huh, mine feels great to me but it's also the only PCC I've ever had, and I have a short stroke buffer in it.
>>62767167The only people this obsessed with street shitters are paki's, Ahmed.
>>62767193you sure now a lot about this stuff, unfortunately not ar15s
>>62767182>Just being realYou don't know the first thing about me, pal>rat in your facecageHow ironic that you make a reference to what I'm assuming is BDSM after calling me deranged>>62767195NTA, but familiar are you with AR-15 history? Here's a trivia question: in which year was the AR-15 officially adopted and designated M16 by the military?
>>62767124Gonna spray bomb it anyway so who gives a fuck
>>62767231>but familiar are you with AR-15 history?i dont answer riddles, master yoda.
>>62767237Yes, that was completely intentional and I am not developing Alzheimer's
>trying to find best passive aiming setup>meanwhile, spending years arguing about it online>always training passive aiming innawoods etc>dome myself when society collapses
>>62767380I'm skipping right to the last part
>>62767231>How ironic that you make a reference to what I'm assuming is BDSMRead a book nigger.
>>62767380Took me 5 minutes to find a good passive aiming setup.
>>62767380fuck aiming i got 30 rounds i'm using all of them
>>62766764I can safely say you retards are all trust-fund kiddies posers
>>62767429Nahh bro I just skipped college, went to work at 15, didn’t get a girl pregnant, drove work or shitty vehicles for 12 years, lived in a place with a cheap cost of living, job provided phone, grow some of my own food, and avoid buying stupid shit/vydia games,
>>62766764Check them for what? I use that when I'm installing them
>>62767476For barrel alignment. If it doesn't go all the way then it's over/under torqued
>>62767456I don’t smoke, and really the dumbest thing I buy too much is beer.
>>62767429God I wish
>>62767482Shouldn't the pin on the barrel extension ensure alignment? Or looking at the feed ramps? Not sure how the barrel nut being torqued to 20 or 90 ft.lbs (or a gorillion in PSA's case) instead of 30-80 would affect that
>>62767508it fucks up everything you should know that if you ever installed one
>>62765922it's fun. feels like a little puzzle you have to solve. its pure autism however. like wugster said, stamp collecting. i enjoy guns
IM GONNA DO ITIM GONNA BUY BOTH THE BADGER AND REPTILIA SCOPE MOUNTS AAAAHHHHHHHHHH
i torqued a scope mount to 30 ft.lbs once instead of inch lbs
>>62767519Enjoy your reptilia shifting in the rail slot under recoil
>>62767514Yeah it'll fuck up your accuracy (so I've heard) but I'm trying to picture how it would fuck up your alignment enough to be discernable with an upper receiver rod
Please convince me to not buy an SR15 lower for $2,000 simply to match my upper.
>>62767532But it has a recoil lug... :(
>>62767519just buy badger
>>62767541>matchy matchyPeak dork/not effay
>>62767521Pro-tip, you don't need a torque wrench for 95% of applications, use the right sized wrench and you'll naturally torque it to around the screw's limit.
>>62767557What about a muzzle device
>>62767541why didnt you just buy a complete sr15 then?
>>62767546It'll still slide a bit and fuck with your POI. Unless my rails are out of spec. But I've had 2 of them do it.Just the other day I had horizontal stringing even at 50 yd, it was Jamal PSA barrel nut tight, after half a mag the recoil lug was gapped. Not blaming them it could be my rail tho
>>62767561Nta but it's pretty hard to over do a muzzle device... You just turn it about 1/8 and it'll stop naturally,you'd have to be on meth to crank it anymore
>>62767557>doesn't just lightly pull the trigger on his uggaduggangmi
>>62767541Because you could spend it on a barret, scar, nods, lam, ammo
>>62767519Just get a Geissele blem next week
>>62767595count nigger haha
>>62767615Huh?
>>62766284You must be the biggest idiot on all the chans. Stupid broke people buy cheap shit. News at 11. Bear creek arsenal pinty and Amazon red dots etc still sell in pre world War 3 2024
>>62767587Is the scar16 really just superior all around? I've been thinking about picking one up and cutting it to 10".
So uhh I overtorqued the bolts attaching my ACOGs to their mounts and now I can't get either of them loose. I wanted to switch the mounts because the one mount interferes with the rear sight on my one rifle.Am I just fucked and need to buy a 3rd ACOG as a retard tax or what?
>>62767640It's pretty good.I sort of regret not just getting one as my first rifle but at least others have learned from my mistakes. I'd rather have a SCAR than a KAC desu.
>>62767676Is the similarity in ballistics between 10" and 11.5' close enough that the 10" scar can still be used as a GPR? That thing is sexy as fuck.
>>62767721>GPRditch this type of thinking from your mind
>>62767721>GPR go back
>>62767550Do the nuts on the side get snagged on gear or is that a non-issue
>>62767659Maybe put some muscle into it? Stick the mount in a vise if need be
>hapafacts has really convinced people that 11.5s are "do it all" rifleslmao this is boomer-tier idiocy
>>62767745non-issue from my experience but your ymmvthey do look pretty big but it hasnt bothered me.
>>62767659heat it, then spray it with kroil, then loosen
>>62767753Oh it you brassfacts. Listen no one cares you're half asian or whatever. The first 200 jokes you made about being asian just made me go "What the fuck is he talking about?"
>ESL>Lacking in reading comprehensionGiving the third world access to the internet was a fucking mistake
>>62767863take your meds faggot
>>62767721There's no hard threshold for that sort of thing. 10" has less velocity than 11.5, which has less than 12.5 and so on. 77gr OTMs have sufficient terminal ballistics out of short barrels to be just fine. So, if you can account for drop then yeah you're fine. If you need more, swap the 16" barrel assembly in.
>>62767749>>62767795Not a matter of strength, I busted two wrenches already and I'm worried about stripping out the screw heads. Heat+kroil
>>62765376Does anyone have an aimpoint 9000sc?
>>62767753Mine works fine
This might sound retarded, but I genuinely believe there is a positive psychological effect to using iron sights. They're always on, never run out of batteries, have no potential for electronics failure, and barring some insane abuse, will always retain zero. They don't get washed out by a white light. I own many optics and appreciate the advantages they offer, but I've been thinking a lot lately about what frame of mind I'd be in if I actually had to use my rifle, and I think I'd feel a lot more confident with iron sights than I would with a dot, god forbid an EOtech or LPVO. Does anyone else's brain work like this? If I really had to grab a gun I think I'd instinctively grab the one with nothing but a sling, irons, and a light.
>>62767942>Does anyone else's brain work like this?No
>>62767942sounds retarded because it is retarded
>>62767926any aimpoint sight that is marketed towards hunters is a piece of shit. just get a pro
>>62765811sadly a holosun gold dot looks better under magnification.
This is my last weekend before I cut some weight. What sort of slop do I get?
>>62765828>>eotech gives you a massive 68 moa ring with a dot inside of it that obscures targetsthen get the dot-only eotech
>>62767949But the 9000 looks better and rule of cool. But thanks I probably should’ve assumed because no cloners use it
>>62767974youre not going to lose weight with that kind of mindset ash
>>62767942You're gonna get a lot of seethe and splash back, but I know what you mean anon. Simplicity has virtue in and of itself.
>>62767974you don't, you start now
>>62767974Guinness and lamb chops
>>62767984>>62768005Can't a negro just enjoy the end of his bulk?
>>62768022enjoy a nice big steak with some mash and asparagus. alternatively replace the mash with garlic parmesan baby potatoes
>>62765842Whats a better choice for secondary aiming on a scoped rifle t2 or p-2?
>>62768032is that even bulking?
>>62768036nigga wants to enjoy a nice meal, i suggested a nice meal
>>62766366I can feel the insects killing me from this photo
>>6276772110 inch rifles are being used for 100 yards to 0 yards so you won't notice the difference.
>>62767595I thought count blemula was an arg shitpost. Had no idea that retarded pa mutt actually does this to his own brand name.
>>62765513Is this gross humor? You keep bringing her up and it’s repulsive every time.
>>62768046Yes and he has his own castle.
>>62768046You know they engrave The Count's face on every blem part, right?
>>62768060>>62768046Like Mark LaRue said, if you have enough rejects to sell as a sperate product line, there is something wrong with your manufacturing. Gunsoomers are absolutely retarded.
>>62768071lmao
>>62768046Once a year during Halloween the count opens the synagogue of savings for hauntingly low prices. The spookiest part, is that some have said their "blem" didn't have any flaws at all.Boo!
oh I feel it comin'
>>62768128>>62768129OH my lmao I can't believe this is real. I am fucking dying over here.
>>62767900>seethingI accept your concession
>>62768128>super semiYeah that's what they called me in high school
>>62767988I'm glad someone gets it. Like I said, I'm not some myopic retard who thinks irons are better than optics. I'm just saying that the raw simplicity of them can't be ignored for defensive purposes (i.e. when your rifle absolutely has to work)
>>62767753A2Grip is a 30yo zoomer.
>>62768013>>62768156PPFAHAHAHA
>>62767974Alright I just said fuck it and got wings. May make my own steak on Sunday though, good recommendation >>62768032
>>62768215enjoy anon
>>62768154(•̀ᵥᵥ•́)
I kind of want another rifle instead of a can
>>62768239I love this little nigga like you wouldn't believe
>>62768241AR10?
>>62768239mine was naked
>>62768249damn that sux. lil vampie parts are worth way more on the r*ddit markets
reddit.com
>>62768258I know it well
>>62768099You're just retarded enough to have fallen for Mark's psyop. He happily sells you the blems and rejects for full price.
>>62768262you just love posting that picture in here huh, you can go back. you might get some gold for it
>>62768241You will regret this. There is nothing more satisfying than having one absolutely rock solid rifle that you're completely familiar with. I pared my AR collection down from 4 to only one and it just feels nice.
>>62767942A lot of what you're saying is wrong and tou don't know this because you're just talking out your ass and don't shoot especially not in most conditions you describe. Rarely will irons shine over a simple red dot. >>62767988Like a simple enclosed dot thats t2 tough and has years long battery life?>>62768186Fall in mud, your iron sights now have some mud on them and are unusable. When would you ever encounter mud? Lmao lmfao, you never gonna go prone bro? Never gonna go outside and touch grass? You musk be able to blow really hard if you're just gonna poof on them to get the mud out of all the books and crannies
>>62768046
>>62767974I ordered some firehouse subs I got the hook and ladder and the new york steamer. Ate half of each now I’m stuffed.
>>62767988>anon figures out why ACOGs and ELCANs are popular
>>62768356>>62768356>>62768356
Meant this >>62768353For (You)>>62767988
>>62768280you're right anon, thanks
>>62765743That's probably how I'll run Brutality when my transition finishes.
>>62766403THIS
>>62767974Live fast and eat ass.
