But if you think the writing is extremely amateur then are you implying you could do better? That you can actually write something that entertains a lot of people? Can you really, amateur?
>>25182960>the heckin dang!! “mmfffuck me in the arse magic computah!!”in all seriousness if you want to read good sci-fi go get a copy of surface detail.
>>25182976>we should enjoy watching people's false ontological worldviews being shattered.imagine how many people sincerely wept when their golden calf was destroyed.media in today's metaphysical ecosystem acts as these golden calves.
>>25181008Dumb Aqua poster
>>25182955This is magnitudes of order worse than Weir. Kys you talentless retard.
>>25181037/lit/homos are lower than weebs and /v/tards combined.
Ginger Snaps edition.OLD: >>25125217
>>25182922Also, don't make the next thread until the current one hits page 10.
>>25182915Hey, is the guy who made this still around? Is this official done?
>>25182996hasn't helped me on that front whatsoeverthat's the real horror
>>25182926I thought millennials were anyone born from 1985-1996?This guy might be late Gen X.
>>25183011Millennials are 1982-1996 IIRC. The start year may be 1980 depending on who you ask.
why did he betray the German people? >In 1942, he wrote in his diary that he was ashamed to be a German soldier after seeing Jewish children in Paris forced to wear the Star of David.he even wrote jewish propaganda in his "diaries", mentioning various alleged atrocities the german army committed throughout ww2 i thought this guy was supposed to be based, but he was a full on jewish race traitor. why do people here push this loser so hard?
who cares, history repays people like him by destroying the very society which would read his writings in the first place, same for Tolkien's
>>25182601I don't see the problem. That is shameful. Being ashamed of evil does not make you a race traitor
>>25182601Your mistake was ever thinking he was pro-Nazi. He openly said he hated that the Nazis used his writings as propaganda.
>>25182601He didn’t have access to internet so he wasn’t ruined for life like you.
>>25182612There is no better way to start hating the French than living a year in Paris.
What makes something "deep"? Is this a subjective quality? Can everyone have a different and valid view of something that is deep? Does the term imply emotional or intellectual complexity? What are authors that are deep?
>>25179521>What makes something "deep"? Is this a subjective quality?Yes.>Can everyone have a different and valid view of something that is deep?Yes.>Does the term imply emotional or intellectual complexity?Yes.>What are authors that are deep?Generally speaking, dead.
>>25179521A thing in itself is not "deep". Deep is just a place you go so to speak. So you can go "deep" with anything.Complexity is something different but it doesn't define how deep you can go.
>>25181529Good way of thinking about it. A line in a poem can be deep. It can take you to place inside that a long complicated novel cant
Why did this thread not get even ten replies? Was it too deep or not deep enough?
>>25182990Probably because you were unwilling or unable to engage any of the comments and the board is dead. Even before it died it was difficult to generate original discussion on books and ideas instead of the>should i read harry potter>woman hating thread>shelf posting thread>woman harry potter thread>woman shelf posting (dumb whores are totally performative! But not me! I only buy classic i have not read before!)
admit it, /lit/.there are definitely instances where the film is better than the book
>>25181142this. the enjoyment of a book and the film adaptation are mutually exclusive. I laughed my ass off reading Clockwork Orange, and I hated the film after that, although I generally liked all Cubrick films. I will never know if I liked the film if I hadn't read the book beforehand.On the other hand I found LotR very boring and pointless after I watched the movie, so I will never know if I had liked those books, either.Books create deeper memories and define you as a thinking human being, so I would always prefer to experience the book.
>>251806682024 Count of Monte Cristo is leagues ahead of the book, it actually manages to preserve the pace and suspense instead of wobbling all over the place, although it is sad that the old man didnt make it into this version
>>25180673>Retard actually thinks the medium defines the qualityLet me guess fan of James 'brainfarts' Joyce, right?
>>25180673This. >>25180668Only when it was slop in the first place.
>>25180818>You can't make a great film out of a good book— Master & Commander: The Far Side Of The World [yes, it draws from several of the books but I don't think that invalidates it]— Lawrence of Arabia— True Grit (2010)— The Maltese Falcon— Deliverance [Maybe. The book is definitely good. The film is on the border of being great I think.]— Gone With The Wind— Blade Runner [Film & book are very different, but you didn't say it has to be a super-faithful adaptation. Book just about scrapes into 'good', I would say.]— Apocalypse Now [Again, film & book are very different, but so what?]— The Talented Mr Ripley [not a profound film, but pretty much flawlessly made, so maybe it makes it into 'great']— The Assassination Of Jesse James [book is not well known but it's quite a decent historical novel]Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
how do they expect me to take this guy seriously? when his whole motivation is"I WANNA HAVE GAY SEX NOW, I WANNA HAVE GAY SEX NOW, I WANNA HAVE GAY SEX NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!"?
>>>/pol/
>>25182882Limonov?
>>25182882Isn't his motive stopping the holocaust (it worked btw)
Can some Aristotle Christcuck please explain to me what differentiates Aristotle from Plato? From everything I've read of Aristotle, it just seems like he was embarrassingly filtered, like a 12 year old atheist. Please, if there are Aristotle tards out there, justify this nigga's existence. I'm at the point where I believe that the only reason he exist is because Jews want to portray Christianity as a consequence of his metaphysics which are ultimately retarded.
>>25182930Not fond of either but from what I recall offhand>Plato believed in metempsychosis while Aristotle believed it was at best unproven>Plato believed matter was shaped by form while Aristotle believed that form was the result of the expression of an innate property in matter>Plato believed that good ethics were the result of knowledge of the absolute supreme good while Aristotle believed they were the result of intelligently engaging in deliberately good actions
>>25182930chicken thing mainly
Talk about poems/poets you like, post your own work, and critique others.
Its path erased by men who sell the riveras developers carved silence into its banks.
The sun has downed beyond the garden;Fingerblades of grass meant to stretchAnd sing Cliotic axes instead are dumb inGray and fruitless mourning, chokedWith the unpicked lilies of ambition
What are lies?Truth’s broken shards reshaped to fit desire’s disguise?Or hollow words, born from the hunger to deceive?Are they fragile stones beneath tomorrow’s fall,or the golden road that tempts us all?They said, nothing in life comes easy.Yet lies they hum so sweet, so flimsy,filling the void with borrowed peace,a comfort stitched from false release.We rest upon that fleeting ease,blind to the rot beneath our knees.Why?Fools, we arebelieving deceit demands no scar.Lives collapse, hearts decay,Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Between a golfing supply placeAnd the green cuboid warehouse of an angler's outfitters,I slipped - it was my lunchbreak - into the undeveloped back-plotsAnd ascending a sandy ridge of high pines,onto gravel paths within sound of the highway,I saw a sign, painted white and proppedAgainst a slender, coral, conical stone;It said, Cult of The Black Bat: Headquartersand High Temple, and in a smaller font:Members Only.Disturbed I returned through the staff room(Breezeblock cloister, familiar humid silence,Haunted by the motionless form of a brother-employee),Affixed my branded golf-cap, and sold golfing suppliesUntil the sun shot flares through the pines,Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>25182887revised prose version. an improvement imo.
Isn't "the unique one" or "the only" or "the ego", a product of society? It is produced by intercourse and womb and raised up and molded. No desires except the simplest, instinctual ones, arise within the individual, they are inputted from his world. His clothes, his language, his habits. There is also nothing the individual does per se, no more than a cell in his body does anything per se. All of his thoughts are woven from the material manufactured by countless other minds and forged by his imagination. He is constantly bombarded by messages and conditions, to have certain desires and drives and to find in these his sense of purpose. How are these subliminal or unconscious "spooks", less spooky than conscious ones? How is it that a union of individuals is a spook, but a conflicting bundle of desires and individual brain cells, is not?
>>25182295>How are these subliminal or unconscious "spooks", less spooky than conscious ones?"There is a difference whether one is determined by an other or by oneself, whether one is a living one or a reasonable one. Love lives on the principle that everyone does what he does for the sake of the other, freedom lives on the principle that he does it for his own sake""But how does love appear in the face of freedom?"Stirner, Preliminary Remarks on the Liebesstaat (pic)>How is it that a union of individuals is a spook, but a conflicting bundle of desires and individual brain cells, is not?I don't think you understand what a spook is, it is not just any idea. A spook is a concept which holds power over you because you've made it real and forgot you were the creator of that concept, that idea, and therefore its master, and therefore capable to abandon it whenever, because it holds no power. A spook is an idea that holds power of decision over you. By "you" you must understand the conscious ego, that must evaluate things for itself. >Isn't "the unique one" or "the only" or "the ego", a product of society? It is produced by intercourse and womb and raised up and molded. No desires except the simplest, instinctual ones, arise within the individual, they are inputted from his world. His clothes, his language, his habits. There is also nothing the individual does per se, no more than a cell in his body does anything per se. All of his thoughts are woven from the material manufactured by countless other minds and forged by his imagination. And when you describe things like this then, what advantage does 'Society' have over the individual more than Nature, or Reality or a God? And so what? Why? What does that have to do with anything that the child is born into the world from the world? Why would that prevent him from claiming acquiring things by himself, for himself? Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>25182964(continuing)another pic from "Philosophical Reactionaries", with a rant that I likeThe hard part is always being clear about what it is to be a slave, or a master. What does it mean to be addicted, and lacking choice, or what does it mean to 'choose' something.To me it always comes clear with that question "Can you say 'no'?". It comes clear that someone addicted to drugs, or food, or TV, is simply unable to say no, and has one desire that eats up every other, It's an imbalance in a way. You could say "but if you desire that thing A(e.g. drugs) and you fulfill that desire isn't that a choice? Isn't that fine? Aren't you saying 'Yes' to it?", You are indeed right that you say yes at all times to a particular desire when you are addicted, but what makes it not a choice, is that you confront one single desire with every other you incapable to say no.Similarly, what is 'choice'? To me choice only happens with a power of evaluation and the *possibility of rejection*, it is saying Yes while having the potential to say No, otherwise it is no choice at all."Where does unselfishness begin? Right where an end ceases to be our end and our property [Eigen/um] , which we, as owners, can dispose of at pleasure; where it becomes a fixed end or a - fixed idea; where it begins to inspire, enthuse, fanaticize us; in short, where it passes into our stubbornness and becomes our - master. One is not unselfish so long as he retains the end in his power; one becomes so only at that 'Here I stand, I can do no other', the fundamental maxim of Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>25182984(continuing)I'll add one last point because I have seen it being brought up against me many times.Continuously saying Yes to living in society is not proof or admission of slavery, or an argument that you should live *for* it, if you say Yes to society continuously because you recognize it benefits *you* when compared to the alternative of being a hermit or committing suicide then it is still a choice so long as you keep the power within you to end yourself at any moment you'd see society being irremediably bad, the Ultimate No, suicide. Live free
What do you think about D.H. Lawrence? Have you read any of his novels/ poetry?
>>25182632>challenged me to back up what I saidBut why would I challenge you when I proved you categorically wrong.? You are not more authoritative than Champfleury. That was the end of the question. Battu encore une fois, le pochard se mettra à chialer à nouveau.
>>25182664>i proved you wrong because I say I did!Email your mom the link yet?
>"When I read Shakespeare I am struck with wonder that such trivial people should muse and thunder in such lovely language."Never read this D.H Lawrence character in my life, but I already like him...a lot.
>>25179048Glad to see others have already recommended later not quite so well-known novels, Kangaroo and The Plumed Serpent. Regarding his poetry: he was a very talented user of strict forms who wrote some really nice lyrics earlier on; later volumes, like Pansies, develop a loose free verse that it like transcribed talk, fortunately very interesting talk. There is a great volume of Complete Poems published by Penguin, I recommend.Lawrence was amazingly productive; he was capable of exceptionally good writing in both prose and verse; naturally enough, not everything he wrote is up to his own best standard.
>>25179060If Dialectical Materialism is correct and metaphysics doesn't exist and it's all just Physicalism then...Why is fascism wrong?
Which hero from the three Greco-Roman epics is /lit/'s favorite? Picture of X-fags missing the point of the Iliad attached for entertainment purposes.
>>25178878AeneasUlysses is the worst.
>>25178878>Achilles>Supercharged by the gods so he slaughters men with ease>Eventually gets in a fight with the river god Scamander>Runs and needs his mommy goddess to save himDude was a fraud, using divine power to beat up on mortals but then running scared to mommy when his opponent had divine power.
>>25181586>bro let's go kill that dude in the forest>bro let's drop acid to get immortality>bro theres a star in the sky for meEpic of gilgamesh is overrated and only valued for its age. Were it written even just after the iliad it would not be as talked about
>>25181913Aeneid is a bad copy of the odyssey.I may need to reread it or find a different translation (read fagles) but it didn't do it for me
>romans try to claim descent from the trojans >brits try to claim descent from the trojans>america by extension has to lay some sort of claim to descent from the trojansWhy did the rest of the west side with the trojans over the Greeks?
its mid
>>25182654Your comment is, ironically, peak midwit
>>25181002There should always be an Orwell thread in here. .. IMHO.
Name 100 better books you have read and 100 worse books you have read.
>>25179892Yeah, no shit. We're living it. Mid is generous. >>25182841He didn't say it was mean.
>>25179892It’s mid as a work of fiction, but it’s extremely insightful as a piece of political writing and it has one of the greatest plot twists of all time.
>around 100 years ago, Fernando Pessoa was strolling through Lisbon when he passed by a friend of his, a notorious homossexual dandy poet, who was hand in hand with a sailor. He decided to engage in friendly banter and chatised him, saying: "Mr. Botto, have you got no shame!? Doing these things on a Friday on Lent!?>the guy replied: Fernando, my friend, sailor is fish
>>25182650Haha great, is this from a biography?
Is this a good read?
>>25182774Alternative title: Peacekeeping, What is it Good For?
>>25182774>Mandatory Stabilization of Foreign Market Economies and PeaceThe penguin translation has really good footnotes
Tango edition/wg/ AUTHORS & FLASH FICTION: https://pastebin.com/ruwQj7xQRESOURCES & RECOMMENDATIONS: https://pastebin.com/nFxdiQvCPlease limit excerpts to one post.Give advice as much as you receive it to the best of your ability.Discuss the written works below for practice; contribute, and you shall receive.If you have not performed a cursory proofread, do not expect to be treated kindly. Edit your work for spelling and grammar before posting.Shitposters should be ignored and reported.Beginner guides on writing:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHdzv1NfZRM [Open]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whPnobbck9s [Open]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAKcbvioxFk [Open]Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
At some point, my main character goes through major physical alterations and a personality change to something crazier, should he be "crazy" just because his weird thoughts are spoken out loud, or what else would show that he's not all right in the head?
>>25182410maybe his actions?
>>25182410you should probably develop a better understanding of what's happening to your character, and why/what you're trying to do. this question demonstrates that you aren't really there yet.
>>25182285Isn't that the great question.
>>25182410You should trust your reader more and be more subtle about it
