So, which of the big companies is going to be the first to offer an affordable 100mp camera?Fuji is obviously already out there, but this thing is Eight thousand dollars. I suspect that when it happens (eventually) it will be Nikon. I feel like historically they are the company which has introduced high end features at a lower price.
>>4480592Why the question? Wanna fake foveon or smth?
>>4480772>>4480774The solution would be to pair it with a 16-bit analog to digital converter
Ah yes, just wait for Nikon to ‘democratize’ it — by selling you a $4k body, a $2k lens, and a firmware update that almost unlocks the feature. Totally affordable, bro
>>4480599>>448061360MP is 24MP with APS-C crop. You can carry a single tiny 35/1.4 lens and have it act as a ~50/2.1 at a moment's notice. Or 50/1.2 -> 75/1.8. Effectively double your focal range entirely for free. This is powerful.
>Over 100 megapickles will be a thing when the technology catches up!Yeah, the Moore's law is dead, good luck with that. I bet we'll get the CSI enhance powered by generative AI instead of reinventing the computing or making picometer chips feasible. Not that the bird photographers or perverts taking photos at the beach really would care either way.
I want to buy a Christmas gift for a girl and I thought of a polaroid as a great gift for her. My question to you, /p/ederasts, is whether it's worth it and not just a meme
>>4482274seeeeeeex
>>4482270What's a /p/ederast, Walter?
>>4482270OP I'm just going to point one thing out.This >>4482272>If you want to buy her a camera, buy her a real camera.Pay attention to the wording because it's truer than you realise. If 'YOU' want to buy her a camera.If she doesn't want a camera, then this is a gay ass idea and you're doing the classic trap of buying a gift for someone (You) would like instead of something they would like.
>>4482270Why wouldn't you think it's worth it? Does she pull out the phone camera for everything she eats? Take selfies? If you've seen her bedroom, does she have shit like string lights on the wall?>make sure she doesn't already have an InstaxOr even if she does, there's the also the Wide models, or printers that connect to your phone.
>>4482270>I want to buy a Christmas gift for a girlDon't.
>camera error editionPrevious: >>4490470
>>4493040Oh, also another thing I noticed is that the internal battery seems to drain fast or not work correctly. In the last 3 months I had the camera ask me for language and time and date settings twice again. Not sure if I should replace that or if I'm just not using my camera enough.
>>4493041Anything decent on the sony side that doesn't break the bank on the used market? Maybe an A7III? I confess I only looked for APS-C cameras back when I bought this one.
>>4493041>and are already using fast lenses and already shooting optimally settings wisehe’s definitely not getting enough light if noise is an issue
>>4492415Because he shook it like a spastic. I'm not even a phtographer but i know not to do that. Ther's moving parts and electric motors in there, why would you yank it around like that?
>>4492977>the eaten off nailsyuck
Last days of 2025 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4467259Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4492816But Dexter Morgan used a Nikon
>>4492816I have compared my new Nikon ZR with my prev A7CII and the ZR files are much more easy to work with. Especially R3D but also the other filetypes. Video + stills
>>4492990>psychopathic serial killer shoots on nikonNot exactly a good flex
>>4492992i dont even color grade. i shoot canon.
>>4492980stop down lol>>4492993it's a macro setup, checks out
Why has the world abandoned photo shoots of good looking women?99% of anything I see now is selfies and if its a photoshoot its just to sell clothing or some super generic looking agency testshoot. 10 years ago or whatever the world was full of every good looking girl doing multiple photoshoots just for content. What happened?
Post photos you like.
the star one is the worst
>Need flash if I want low light that’s not at f2 >Camera only simulates ambient exposure won’t even recognize flash bc it’s not native >At least it fires I swear canon software gimps the budget cameras Can’t even post jpeg bc snap seed won’t do 5 megabytes
>>4492972Guide number + manual mode maybe?
>>4492972Can't you try some aftermarket software on your camera like magic lantern to get some extra features back
O one like stylised or too arty stuff, photography has so much more potential
Well I ordered a used Fujifilm GFX 100s for 3k and the Gf 50mm f3.5 for a little over 600$. I've been doing a series of suburban/urban landscapes late at night and was previously shooting with a Nikon z7ii and the 35mm f1.4 and Voigtlander Nokton 40mm. I think the 50mm should be a pretty good light weight option but I was also looking at adapting some pentax 645 and Mamiya glass. I've also heard the Mitakon 65mm f1.4 is pretty good. Any suggestions or tips for someone who hasn't ever shot digital medium format?
i had a 50r and the 50mm 3.5 and the 65mm mitakon for a bit. sold the 50r and the 50mm and got a 100s and the 45mm 2.8. it spends most of its time with an adapted macro lens attached now lol, because i use it to scan my film. the mitakon is good, about what you'd expect from a large aperture lens on the cheaper side. otherwise it's mostly used for friends and family picsnormally i shoot film or apsc. the most noticeable thing about shooting on the 100s for me is that the files are giant and slow to work on my computer. another strange result i get with the 100s and had with the 50r is color banding on jpegs. which seems strange to me because i never had an issue with that any other cameras - compact, apsc, full frame, etc. probably user error since i haven't heard of others running into this. you could say just always shoot raw if you're going to go to the trouble to get a gfx. that's pretty fair but a lot of the time you don't want to deal with a 200mb raw file and its annoying for such supposedly powerful camera to have such a lame shortcoming. besides that, it's very nice
people hear 'medium format' and expect to get blown away. but as you'd guess from the sensor size, it's not radically different from ff
>>4492438Actual medium format film is noticably nice because you get very fine grain (except for 645) and pleasing film attributes in basically any scenario outside of super low-light.GFX Medium Format is like what... 1.2x larger than FF? Pretty sure 645 is 1.4x the size of 35mm/FF, and 6x7 is 1.5x. Except I'm absolutely convinced due to the way smaller pixel pitch you get worse colour rendition and less light gathering.
>>4492437If you get a GFX to shoot JPG you are a retard, simple as
>>4492368Just use a digicam. Trust. You can get one of those suckers at the thrift for 30 bucks.
Rank the Trump Portraits
>>4432117His face is in the spotlight, but the light ends on his neck and his genitals are steeped in shadows. It's very metaphorical and shit.
>>4432114#2cause, who doesn't want to look like Joe Pesci's demented cousin from California
2 is literally his best photo. He looks the nicest in it, safe lighting choices.
>>4432114Every one except number 2 looks like a toddler shitting his pants
>>4432114Number 2 is the clear winner because the rest are just giving off confused grandad
Haven't posted in a couple of months but got a few rolls developed recently and I'm slowly going through scanning them.Exif: Leica M3 + Nokton 50mm f.1.5 + Vision3 250D (for the first seven ones), then Aerocolor IV for the remaining four.
Last one from this roll.
Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
>>4485702This
Film photos are just pleasing to look at. You can tell when a photo is taken on film.
>>4492047Are these a woman's BREASTS!?On my blue board?!!??!
>>4492714NoHe’s a man, so it’s SFW.
>>4492047It's pleasing because tits, not because film.
>>4492851
>>4492855
OC
>>4492855>Poppy with my Bronica sq
>>4492918new james cameron avatar lookin good
Reply if you're a real mf'er
>>44914156x6 TLRs are a lot smaller than you'd think.A folder is probably always going to win on compactness, but zone focussing and composing with the brilliant finder on my Ikon 515/2 sucks. My Microcord (Rolleiflex copy for all intents and purposes iirc) is smaller volume wise than my 35mm SLRs.>>4491421I understand the packing purposes issue but personally when I've travelled with my folder I always brought a 35mm SLR anyway because I knew the folder was so limiting.There are a few folding rangefinders, like the Mamiya Six, Voigtlander and Zeiss made them also. You could always get a hotshoe rangefinder and mount it to your folder.tl;dr Like you say if you bring the folder you will want a 35mm also, so the TLR is there if you want to replace both I suppose. Unless your folder has a rangefinder already in which case I think wanting anything further is GAS.
>>4492500>HotshoeI meant cold shoe but you get the pointPicrel is from my Ikon 515/2 on a trip to Vienna where I just had a carry on bag. I still managed to pack my Praktica TL1000. I've done small day hikes with the same set up without issue.
>>4492708kat
>>4483220>sekonic l-308xmost comfy and good for it's price.
contributemostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10DI think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and thereI also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too greatalso, /digishit/ general bread
>>4492439Still not convinced I should keep it.
maow
fujifilm finepix S5200got at thrift store for 10 dollars
literally unmogged even to this day
>>4491626>12MPlollmao even
>what is the d800
>>4491649Same, Bro. I half-filled my freezer with Portra last year.
D700 + Ikelite 200DL + Sugma EX 28/1.8
I went out on the streets late and took some photos tonight with this phone, here they are..
I'm buoyed by the compliments, thanks guys>>4491562No there's CCTV in that park
>>4490749I was thinking something similar. It's cool that the camera is low quality but there's still thought and intention behind every picture. Good work OP, you made something interesting.
>>4491563and if there weren't cctv?
>>4492552
Loved the first one
