>>4318694
I hate this photo. It is the pinnacle of street snapshittery and anyone who says it's great is devoid of any artistic sense.

>>4318704
t. Stupid fingers

>>4318704
I think capturing the person jumping would be one thing sure, but the poster in the back makes the photo good.

>Who or what influences your photography the most? Share a photo that demonstrates this influence.

File: uhh-2.jpg (2.72 MB, 3130x2075)

2.72 MB JPG

>>4318722
forgot to answer question whoops. Old Jap. and French movies inspire the photos I want to take the most. Picture unrelated.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:29 13:39:34
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4318704
Can you go into detail as to why it is so bad?

>>4318734
It's not actually a bad photo, but people's insistence that it is a great photo is what causes it to be so bad. In reality it's an unremarkable snapshit. You see dozens of these posted to /p/ every week.

The photo isn't a decisive moment as people keep parroting because in order for it to be a decisive of a moment the moment must have meaning. Jumping over a puddle is not meaningful, it does not speak a higher order truth, it doesn't even evoke any emotion.

What this photo actually is, is the essence of an action, the frame when a jump visually becomes a jump. It represents the photographer's skill with a camera. This would have been a pretty difficult shot, but that's it. It's demonstrative of his mechanical, operational skill with a camera, which is impressive, but a skilled shot isn't the same thing as a good photo.

It's not wholly bad. The atmosphere is nice, the fog, and everyone being cloaked in shadow. The mirroring effect of the water creating an inverse image is kinda cool. But those elements would be improved by removing the jumping man. The actually great shot imo, is the shadowy figures huddled around an iron gate in ruins. He just didn't take that photo, he took a photo of a man trying to keep his pants dry.

>>4318722
>the poster makes it good
Elaborate on why you think this, please.

File: IMG_2066.jpg (943 KB, 1284x1561)

943 KB JPG

See oddball Kodak films like 2366 for good prices on fleabay from china, are these fools gold? I can get 20 rolls of 2366 for 7cad per roll which is (sadly) a good price here. But apparently it’s iso 6 film. Is this a meme film or is such a low iso actually usable beyond stil life studio stuff? Anyone use anything like it before?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1284
Image Height	1561

File: par44919.jpg (1.57 MB, 5000x3374)

1.57 MB JPG

>>4318738
The poster in the background mirrors what is happening with the jumping guy. It's life imitating art in a fleeting moment.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	XY-15
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Photographer	©H.CARTIER BRESSON/MAGNUM PHOTOS
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	12426
Image Height	8384
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2012:05:04 09:29:16
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5000
Image Height	3374

>>4318694
>Who or what influences your photography the most?
impressing anons on /fgt/
>Share a photo that demonstrates this influence.
no photo cuz I never get replies lmao

File: film109_b.jpg (74 KB, 520x422)

74 KB JPG

Need recommendations for a good beginner film camera. I tried an old folding camera (agfa solinette) but the shutter quit on me, so now I'm thinking about getting a canon t50 or similar. Figured I should probably get an SLR or rangefinder to start with anyway (so half my photos aren't blurry). Preferably fully manual but I'm open to other types

might try a folding camera again one day though, probably medium format

>>4318812
Probably a sinar norma.

>>4318812
Pentax Spotmatic

File: IMG_2001.jpg (1.59 MB, 3024x4032)

1.59 MB JPG

>>4318812
just get an eos 650 or something else cheap and embrace the fully electronic fully autofocus life anon, i mean, why are you shooting film, for the "muh manual camera" larp, or for the images?
>t. eos 1 enjoyer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 13 Pro Max
Camera Software	17.4.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:03 17:02:46
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	-0.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	1.57 mm
Image Width	3024
Image Height	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.9
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 7Q0A6948.jpg (4.49 MB, 4172x5964)

4.49 MB JPG

>>4318443
took the time to properly set up the mirrorless and grab the rest of the test shots from the minox 35. Turns out scale/zone focusing leads to a lot of soft images kek. still, it kinda metering close is a win since it was supposedly broken. Guess i just have to practice scale focusing to get a better feel for it. or just use delta 3200 and never leave f16.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:29 20:18:11
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4318817
I guess I figured I'd enjoy the slowed down process of manual and I wanted an older looking camera anyway, but I did look at canon rebels and the minolta dynax

File: uhh 2.jpg (2.78 MB, 3130x2075)

2.78 MB JPG

>>4318827
I endorse Canon Rebels. Dollar for dollar the best film camera ever made. pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:29 19:00:56
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4318836
If we’re going canon film, I’d say step up from a rebel to at least like an elan ii or an a2 or something. Still just as cheap but more featureful. Rebels were the entry level grandma tier cameras, though they do still work very nicely.

>more than a century of different cameras brands from all over the world that can be used with film
>Faggots always default to their canonikon japshit garbage

>>4318882
>shooting film as an excuse to anachronistically larp rather than using the tool that will give you the best results in the simplest manner
I guess it’s the difference between car guys who like to drive and car who care more about wrenching.

>>4318903
anachronistic larping is all that's left, man

File: whoops-1.jpg (2.04 MB, 2075x2594)

2.04 MB JPG

>>4318882
sometimes I just don't want to think about any of the settings or focus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:29 23:44:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4318882
>japshit garbage
then why is it the default?

File: WhatsApp Image 2024-05-30(...).jpg (492 KB, 1200x1600)

492 KB JPG

Cyanotype via Large Format dipshit here
Update on it so far; I successfully took 4 images, a fifth was underexposed too much. However, i've had issues in dev where the chemistry simply washes off the paper.
I think this is due to the bottom part of the chem layer not being affected enough by the UV. Did a test dev on one of those four images where I burned it in under a UV for a minute, and it seemed to help though I had a heap of chemistry come off the page and splotch on the image.
Trying three new papers this weekend, going to expose for much longer (three hours min) and also have pre-flashed an alternate for each paper stock for one minute under UV lights (strong enough that 10mins fully exposes a negative on them). Will report back once this all shakes out.

It's fun though!

>>4318742
>iso 6 positive b&w duplicating film
Yeah I would probably not start with 20 rolls but the sample pictures don't look half bad. It's UV sensitive so you could get some interesting effects.
Keep in mind kodak doesn't put expiration dates on the film so your chinese supplier could have found the spool after it sat in a warehouse since 1995

File: Fujifilm Velvia 100F-28.jpg (124 KB, 1497x1000)

124 KB JPG

>>4318694
It's hard to say what I think influences it, i'm really bad at reflection on my work, and so much of what I do is, not formulaic, but I guess outcome driven. I guess when it comes to my personal film work, I compare a lot of my flower and garden photography to my mother's work, trying to capture an idealised vision of what I see her style as. It's about capturing the flower fully but not in a way that exposes it's flaws I guess? Almost like photographing a woman as corny as that sounds.

Pic isn't hers, but it's the closest I feel I've come to it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:13 17:05:09
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4319016
cute

>>4319014
Yeah seems risky but they only offer decent pricing on bulk lots (though I suppose that’s a Costco type fallacy). Maybe I’ll just stick to the basics for now. I was more interested by the price than by that stock itself.

>>4319013
>However, i've had issues in dev where the chemistry simply washes off the paper.
I think this is due to the bottom part of the chem layer not being affected enough by the UV.
For classic cyanotype using FAC this is the normal behavior and means it was not yet fully exposed. Basically everything below a certain exposure is washed away and only once that threshold is reached, additional exposure will start building density.
This can be adjusted by increasing the acid content of the first wash, e.g. if you soak it in 10% vinegar or 1% sulphamic before the actual wash it should retain more of the image. This lowers the contrast, obviously.

>>4319117
the second sentence should of been a quote, too :/

>>4319013
Good work! Alternative process photography can have some pretty steep learning curves, keep at it and youll get there. Wet plate colloidion sure does... Im around 100 plates in and I still have a long ways to go.

File: plnt.jpg (2.86 MB, 1604x2420)

2.86 MB JPG

>>4318742
>ISO 6
bro... positive b/w is cool but you'll 100% need a tripod or shoot wide open in the middle of the day handheld which defeats the sharpness of positives/slides. It won't take pushing too well either... likely not worth it except creative/studio work.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4319151
It's super high contrast film, so pulling would actually be beneficial when using it for pictorial work.

File: VetteC6.jpg (2.94 MB, 1604x2420)

2.94 MB JPG

>>4319152
True but then you'd risk 'thinning out' the film too much... IMO no matter what you do in dev, ISO 6 is gonna be tough to handhold.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4319151
Yeah I was playing around with an exposure calculator to see what settings would work to match ev15/sunny 16, and it could work at f4 or larger but that’s pretty limiting. Might be good to get muh bokeh snapshits in bright daylight though, I think my eos 5 goes to 1/8000 lol

>>4318737
The merit is being the first cool looking snapshit.
At least Henri hung out at compositionally promising locations for hours for that scene to manifest itself, that is worth something

>>4318812
Don't you have fathers and grandfathers old camera gear?

>>4319192
He's a good photographer, I like a lot of his other photos. But this is not a good photo. Yet it receives so much acclaim

Just an fyi for anyone trying to do high magnification wetplate macro shots...

The aluminum plates are not flat enough. You need to use float glass if you want good results...

File: IMG_4019.jpg (2.62 MB, 3578x2433)

2.62 MB JPG

>tfw you bring all your nice lenses to Gibraltar just to have forgotten your pro quality film

At least pro image 100 did well for the bright light and is a little more fine grained than Ultramax

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Photographer	chetdepue@gmail.com
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:22 08:51:41
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3578
Image Height	2433
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 34901EDC-DDCC-412B-908A-9(...).jpg (3.79 MB, 2256x3317)

3.79 MB JPG

>>4319225
My edit attempt

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Photoshop Express 24.19.0.8262
Photographer	chetdepue@gmail.com
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:30 21:00:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2256
Image Height	3317
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4319226
The original looks a lot better on my screen. Your edit is mega blue.

File: psnf2023220230919_16581893.jpg (2.24 MB, 5381x3705)

2.24 MB JPG

>>4318742
ISO 6 is basically worthless
Photography is basically impossible under 20 iso besides some super autistic studio work or wanting to do a 15 minute long exposure in broad daylight like that first photo of the guy getting his shoe shined. If you want low ISO start with PANF 50 iso and if you like that try RPX 25 (this requires its own developer I think though).

Pic rel is a high res scan of PANF

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3900 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3900 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5381
Image Height	3705
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4318737
>You see dozens of these posted to /p/ every week
>r3dd1t spacing
then surely you would be able to take one as well? you should post a similar photo that you took! surely you have one just as good

File: dsc_3638.jpg (2.87 MB, 4000x6000)

2.87 MB JPG

>>4319231
My favorite film tone is actually the look of the old vivid saturation Kodak films. The ideal film I would’ve wanted in Gibraltar probably would’ve had the color profile of Velvia 100 (which despite being legal in Europe is still impossible to find)

Here’s an unedited Nikon digital of Gibraltar. Perhaps it looked bluer to my human eye. I just didn’t want that washed out Africa piss filter look even though I was literally a stones throw from Africa.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7200
Camera Software	Ver.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:19 07:26:36
Exposure Time	13981/44739201 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4319226
ken rockwell are you trolling /p/ again?

File: IMG_4020.jpg (2.44 MB, 3578x2433)

2.44 MB JPG

>>4319235
Nah, I’m not as crazy as Ken. He shoots everything like it’s a damn sunset in terms of saturation. Also I heard from another bro on this forum he sold all his fridge kept 220 velvia.

I guess I’m more used to how the sky looks in North America and how it’s affects my film (pic rel). Southern Spain/North Africa might be a little too suns washed for what I’m used to.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Photographer	chetdepue@gmail.com
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:22 08:59:25
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3578
Image Height	2433
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4319234
haha cheesin'

File: IMG_3983.jpg (2.75 MB, 3578x2433)

2.75 MB JPG

>>4319239
Ken would probably appreciate this phot though. Warming filter used on a 100mm prime f2.8 (as Ken himself described this lens like 20 years ago “laugh at the guys carrying their heavy $1500 lenses, this is the lightest and smallest tele Nikon ever made!”) and the peacocks are the type of animal that begs for oversaturation.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Photographer	chetdepue@gmail.com
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:22 08:50:28
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3578
Image Height	2433
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4319232
That looks like ass lmao

File: psnf2023220230919_16343495.jpg (2.29 MB, 4825x3191)

2.29 MB JPG

>>4319244
After I posted it I realized it’s a shitty scan.
My schools scanners done autofocus and I don’t know how to properly find the plane of focus on them.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3500 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3500 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4825
Image Height	3191
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4319193
no, they always got disposables

>>4319225
is it me or is nothing in focus
or is the lens just a bit soft

File: IMG_20170628_0061.jpg (1.26 MB, 1732x1140)

1.26 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:30 21:29:57
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Untitled11 (6).jpg (803 KB, 4332x2883)

803 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4332
Image Height	2883
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:17:14
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4332
Image Height	2883

File: IMG_20170502_0007.jpg (1.48 MB, 2656x2664)

1.48 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	IJ Scan Utility
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2017/05/02 23:13:01
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2656
Image Height	2664

File: IMG_20170404_0028.jpg (967 KB, 1684x1124)

967 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	IJ Scan Utility
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2017/04/04 22:42:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1684
Image Height	1124

File: IMG_20161223_0044.jpg (429 KB, 1744x1132)

429 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	IJ Scan Utility
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2016/12/23 19:11:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1744
Image Height	1132

File: IMG_20170802_0039.jpg (507 KB, 3424x2288)

507 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3424
Image Height	2288
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Created	2019:01:04 12:09:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3424
Image Height	2288

>>4319296
me in the chair

File: Capture.png (2.16 MB, 1591x1479)

2.16 MB PNG

>>4319296
same vibe

File: WhatsApp Image 2024-05-31(...).jpg (75 KB, 1600x1200)

75 KB JPG

>>4319117
Thanks! I came to roughly the same conclusion, tested in devving those first pictures with a burn in to try and hold it on. Pic rel is one thats had it washed off, and one that I treated to 1min of UV, and then the bottom strip another minute to test contrast etc

>>4319135
Yeah, it's pretty fun but I feel like im grasping at fog sometimes haha. Just wish it wasn't 90mins or more per exposure, that's the real killer with the process

>>4319396
Should add these will obvs get darker as they dry, so Ill have a look tomorrow morning to see if pic has any usable parts, or if pic B isn't crushed contrast wise

File: IMG_5186.jpg (1.52 MB, 4829x3219)

1.52 MB JPG

>>4319300
Is this old Agfa stick or colorplus 200? This has a very unique early 90s look to it color and fade wise.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Fix 1.7.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4829
Image Height	3219
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4319397
During the washing you can add a bit of hydrogen peroxide to get the color faster

File: IMG_20170802_0041.jpg (2.08 MB, 3416x2288)

2.08 MB JPG

>>4319457
Can't remember, but it's probably portra, and shot with a G1. Pic is from same roll. Lightroom auto button corrected the color a tiny bit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2019:01:04 12:09:53
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20170802_0024.jpg (1.22 MB, 3424x2264)

1.22 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2019:01:04 12:09:30
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4319288
i think it's front focused on the rocks by a bit, and for sharp fur in wind you have to use a really fast shutter speed.

File: spanishuke-2.jpg (3.65 MB, 1604x2420)

3.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

care to explain why an m2/m3 body in decent condition is still at least €2k and why do i still feel the urge to buy one?

>>4319574
>care to explain why an m2/m3 body in decent condition is still at least €2k
Homosexuals
>and why do i still feel the urge to buy one?
Homosexual

File: 20240531_155835.jpg (1.69 MB, 1800x2140)

1.69 MB JPG

So incredibly close.

This picture looks simple, but it has been absurdly difficult to get everything just right to pull it off. I think it's over 2:1 enlargement of the subject.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:31 15:58:36
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	8.4 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	17/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4319583
correct answer

>>4319678
>phone photo making it even harder to tell if this is a picture of something or a horrid darkroom mistake
Do you not own a real camera

Phones are a regression from $25 amazon PNS shitters. The sharpening and HDR intended to make them as soulless and non artistic as possible (peak corporate america) loops around to make it impossible to tell whats in a photo other than a selfie or a text document scan.

>>4319687
SORRY!

I have a 5dm3, but my computer is broken. Does canon have an EF mount camera with bluetooth file transfer?

>>4319689
Buy a card reader for your shite phone

>>4319693
Oh yeah... I have one of those things...

File: 5E7A6100.jpg (3.83 MB, 2622x3382)

3.83 MB JPG

>>4319693
Ha ha! Still looks better in person, but this is like 80% there.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3686
Image Height	4428
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:01 17:25:07
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
Focal Length	150.00 mm
Metering Mode	Spot
Exposure Time	31/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown
F-Number	f/5.6

File: 5E7A6105.jpg (4.76 MB, 3904x3072)

4.76 MB JPG

I really like how this one came out. The detail is even finer in person. Also when they dry out they lose contrast and then when you varnish them they get it back permanently.

Tommorow I will show the 3 I made to frame.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5091
Image Height	3840
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:01 17:59:08
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
Focal Length	150.00 mm
Metering Mode	Spot
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown
F-Number	f/8.0

File: 000095610015.jpg (1.01 MB, 1545x1024)

1.01 MB JPG

Hey anons. This is my first ever roll of film. This was the only decent pic of the bunch. Having a lot of fun. I like being more deliberate about my shots as opposed to digital.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4319761
You've taken your first step into a larger world. what film is this

>>4319761
I started shooting film a few months ago and I feel the same way. It's hard to go back to digital without feeling like it's cheapening the experience. What was your first roll? did you develop it yourself?

File: D32002.jpg (957 KB, 1998x1349)

957 KB JPG

I want a camera which is as compact as possible so that I can fit it in my pocket but still has all the manual functions incl manual focus. What are my options?

I have a compact p&s but not being able to focus is incredibly gay

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Image-Specific Properties:

>>4319800
rollei 35

>>4319678
very good even imperfection-free coating, it's nice to see someone treat collodion seriously. What's your setup(photo equipment, portable sensitising/dev equipment etc) and what sort of stuff do you do with this?

>>4319800
>>4319805
Manual focus how? Rangefinder, zone focus, reflex? I mean the answer is still the Rollei 35 but I wonder what anon is actually looking for. I have an Olympus xa, aperture priority no full manual but honestly full manual for a snapshit pocket cam is just larpy demanding. There’s also the minox35 but that’s only scale focusing and again aperture priority.

>>4319800
Olympus 35RC

>>4319800
Super solinette

File: IMG_20240601_185701880~2.jpg (2.81 MB, 3072x4080)

2.81 MB JPG

hell yeah

File: 20240601_114437.jpg (1.37 MB, 1610x2733)

1.37 MB JPG

>>4319820
Thank you. That image was taken with a single strobe and a sinar p2(god tier 4x5 camera). The setup(pic) I use is distilled autism, but it is what must be done to take a photo like this.

I just use one of those classic wooden boxes to hold the silver nitrate. For development I use a shot glass to pour my developer, and a squeeze bottle with water over a big tray for stopping dev. I have to sun my silver soon, ugh.

I'd like to eventually get a car setup so I can travel and do wetplates. I think I may wait until I practice 8x10. The 4x5 plates are super nice, but they feel small. Portraits are super fun and challenging also.

The instant feedback has been an invaluable tool for improving my view camera skills as well. The insane challenge these macro shots pose is also super good practice for me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:06:01 11:44:37
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	26/625 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	640
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4319865
SUPER BASED.

File: r001-024.jpg (2.54 MB, 5419x3612)

2.54 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6007
Image Height	4035
Image Created	2024:05:04 12:00:00

File: nowautism.jpg (60 KB, 750x696)

60 KB JPG

>>4319912
holy shit

Lads, close to jumping into bulk rolling but I’m not sure what speed film to get for it. Basically it looks like my cheapest options are 100 or 400. I was thinking I’ll get one and then push/pull for flexibility if needed. What will black and white film handle better? Buy the 100 and expose faster if needdd, or buy the 400 and expose slower? No, I’m not buying two rolls before one of you clever boys responds with that.

>>4319988
Get XX and shoot it at whatever you speed you want between 25 and 1600. It just werks.

>>4319988
Buy a single roll of whatever the fuck you wanna bulk roll first, clever boy
You're dividing B&W film into these 2 big groups based on >ISO
At least do the bare minimum and research a bit to see WHICH film stock suits you better, and *then* see how it behaves when pushed/pulled and how you like it
Shooting double x, as >>4319990 said, is wildly different to shooting Delta 100, for example, which will also be different to shooting some Foma 100
All three are B&W and iso 100 and yet vary greatly in many aspects
So think about that before buying 100 feet of a film stock you didn't even look up on google before for fuck sake
Just google "[film stock] pushed to [iso]" and check the lomography link to have an idea
>TL;DR
Buy Kentmere 100
It's cheap, it's good, it looks even better when pushed to 400
Good contrast, great image quality, fine grains, let's you edit the shit out of it however you like
And you can push it to 800 without much difference, too
Maybe 1600 but I haven't tried it yet

>>4320000
>You're dividing B&W film into these 2 big groups based on >ISO
Ackshiallynim dividing purely based on price and it just so happens the cheapest two bulk rolls I can find that I don’t need to order from America are the same price but 100/400, hence my question. Could give fuck all about muh character or whatever metaphysical bullshit you’re prattling on about.

>>4320006
>Could give fuck all about muh character or whatever metaphysical bullshit you’re prattling on about.
There are *objectively* different qualities when comparing different film stocks and how they behave when pulled/pushed
I not only gave you the way to finding out which film stock would suit your preferences better, but also gave you the easiest path telling you to buy a specific film stock that is cheap, good quality and pushes well so that your lazy ass could buy something decent and not regret it later
But you're too much of an ungrateful piece of shit to even accept help all the while you're incompetent to the point of not being able to google and look up for yourself what your preference is
Arrogance and incompetence sure is a great combo

>>4320029
I don’t care about minute differences in grain structure or wheat ever else you think is actually significant (it’s not. The images get captured regardless kek), I just care about whichever roll is the cheapest. Your long winded answer did it address anything that I was actually wanting to know with my question, hence my lack of appreciation for it. TLDR; shit response for shit answer.

>>4320036
>I just care about whichever roll is the cheapest.
Just buy the cheapest shit you find then, retard
It's pretty obvious

>>4320038
Well obviously, but there’s a roll of 40@ and a roll of 100 at the same cheapest price, hence my simple question. Which should have a simple answer but I guess it’s my fault for expecting 4chan mongoloids not to autistically spaz out in some tangent unrelated to my question, that’s on me, sorry lads.

>>4320040
>doesn't accept complete, in-depth answer
>doesn't accept direct answer (Kentmere 100)
>doesn't accept the answer you want to be given ("buy the cheapest one")
>doesn't want to do basic research looking up the possible buying options and how they look when pushed
It's your fault being an ungrateful bitch
Buy the 100 iso of whatever the fuck you have and stop spamming the thread

>>4320040
ngmi

>>4319952
I'm having an absolute blast using that camera. Spent 3 hours to make 3 images today. Almost got it perfect.

I've realized that I need to make my own ultra fine ground glass to properly focus my macro subjects with. Even with a 10x loupe I can only just distinguish true sharp focus... Fun!

>>4320048
It can be in depth and complete but it’s not an answer if you don’t actually answer the question I asked initially you doofus lol. And you can larp as a janny all you like but I’ll post as much and wherever I want thanks.
>he does it for free
Lol

>>4320052
The answer you got was to do your research because there's no objective answer to your question and you need to find out by yourself
But then again you're an arrogant retard and won't do it

File: 5E7A6106.jpg (4.15 MB, 4300x3072)

4.15 MB JPG

Aaaand here is my latest wetplate.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5376
Image Height	3840
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:02 19:12:39
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
Focal Length	150.00 mm
Metering Mode	Spot
Exposure Time	3.2 sec
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown
F-Number	f/8.0

Those 35mm point n shoot auto-focusing overly expensive cameras are all hype, right?

>>4320072
The T3 is fire, but definitely overpriced.

File: gayshica.jpg (32 KB, 500x375)

32 KB JPG

>>4320072
Thinking about cameras such as the Contax and the Olympus mju series for instance. The latter i see almost as many "for parts" as functional ones for sale. Is pic related for instance that much worse?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4320069
its certainly wet
>>4320072
Like what, the Contax ones? The Contax T is solid can't talk about the rest

>>4320076
They look better wet/varnished than when they are completely dried. Deeper black and some of the highlight detail shows better.

>>4319800
contax T or Minox but they are Aperture priority. focus is manual though

>>4320072
yes its just fashion meme. they get mogged by some $20 late 90s SLR with a nifty fifty and the 80s AF crap no one wants give the same sharp prime photos just in a "ugly" design the hipsters dont want

>>4320081
Not the contax T3.

>>4320072
Some of them are nice cameras enough in their own right, but the whole segment has had meme price explosions the last decade. An Olympus mju used to be found in charity shops for 10 quid and now goes for over a hundred, that sort of thing. There are no “good buys” in terms of value, so just approach it as a luxury good, if there’s one you really want, you’re essentially burning money.

>>4320083
It’s a known unreliable camera I’d never drop the kind of money they’re going for now.

>>4320072
Benefit
>auto exposure
>autofocus

Downfall:
>spend 1k usd on a plastic piece of shit so when it breaks you're fucked

>>4320052
fomapan!!

>>4319762
>>4319764
This was on Kodak 400TX. I was trying to do landscape photography with it. Hence, why all the other pictures were not so good.
I had it developed at my local camera shop. They were really nice and I was happy to give them my business and I just want to focus on shooting for a bit before I get into developing myself.
I really do feel like it's a different experience. Digital is a more instant gratification. With film, I know that I have about 36 shots on a roll and I have to make them count, and I think that will make me a better photographer in the long run.

>>4320113
Well nice, I'm glad it's been a good experience. B&W home development is pretty easy. The most challenging part is learning to thread your film onto the reel for developing and it's not super expensive. I've had good results with the cinestill kit. I send all my color film out to a local place to develop since it's more involved and expensive to get up and running. I'm glad you're enjoying it though.

>I know that I have about 36 shots on a roll and I have to make them count, and I think that will make me a better photographer in the long run.
Personally my keeper rate has almost doubled. Between the manual focus, the film advance lever, and the limited number of shots I take a lot more time to really think about if a shot is worth taking or if it just 'looks nice'. I personally feel like it's taken my photos from 'pleasant snapshits' to something more.

>>4320096
It is not an unreliable camera. You have one fail on you?

>>4319912
>that bellows extension
lmfao, how the hell did you dial in the exposure? just trial and error? what f-stop is >>4319713 taken up to get this DOF this close up? You're really pushing the envelope as far as it can budge with this setup/medium choice. Do you buy everything (collodion/tintype plates etc) or make stuff yourself? What about glass plate negs, for contact printing with all the variety of methods and options that entails?

Really cool stuff, please keep us updated on your exploits. Do you have some online presence where you share this stuff?

File: 1569497999659.png (643 KB, 1022x731)

643 KB PNG

Brief heart attack as friend borrowing my P30 pushed down on the shutter apparatus removing his film for the first time

Managed to get them realigned and all working okay now

>>4320083
cope. a slr with a modern 35 destroys it. ur kidding urself if u think ancient small lens designs on a fashion accessory camera compete what slrs and pro level gear. its a toy

>>4320095
the fact kyocera rebranded luxury market consumer stuff is talked about in the same sentence as mommy cameras like the oly mju says enough about how memes have elevated certain models of p&s far beyond their performance

File: IMG_2071.jpg (909 KB, 1284x1675)

909 KB JPG

>>4320162
>>4320095
Someone just posted this to marketplace this morning, what timing lol. It’s insane. I’ve owned the mju in the past, yeah it was a nice little camera sure but nowhere near these prices they sell for now. I bought three of them off the junk wall in a thrift store for like 15 bucks, old film cameras like this used to just go in baggies and be considered almost junk. Crazy.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1284
Image Height	1675

>>4320193
I actually like the mju and wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to people for $100 or so. It's the fake Contax Kyocera shit that is really sad. Go see the samples from these cameras and laugh as they are no better than any other 35mm point and shoot.

File: KodakProImage100-1.jpg (3.31 MB, 2048x1359)

3.31 MB JPG

who /sp/ here?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:29 16:59:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4320125
>how the hell did you dial in the exposure?
You can use a tape measure to compute an exposure with bellows drawn that far- divide the extension by the focal distance at infinity, square the result, then take the base-2 logarithm of that result to get the number of stops you need to correct. If you're using tilts and swings, you can use the ratio in sizes of some object in the scene and on the ground glass.

>Best place for e6 development and scanning?

Blue Moon camera seems to have issues with their ordering page.

>>4320232
sports are so boomer coded, my guy

>>4320225
I would hesitate, as nice as it is as a camera, it just isn’t a 100 dollar piece of kit. It’s just not, and we need to stop encouraging this stupid tiktoker YouTuber hyperinflation of everything. These should be 10 dollars in a thrift store camera bucket at most, like they were a decade ago.

File: 20240601_161834.jpg (1.36 MB, 1753x3239)

1.36 MB JPG

>>4320125
What >>4320247 said. For this set up exposure is measured in # of flash bursts. Depending on the scene it is 4-10 1000ws bursts, lol. I don't even use a shutter for these.

Around +4 stops worth of bellows extension at f32 is sort of where I'm limited until I get a more powerful strobe, or better suited strobe. I don't mind doing 10 bursts, but I'm not doing 20 lol.

I think that pic was f32. I like to work around f22-f45 because my lens is sharpest at f22. I make sure to use tilt/swing to the best of my ability to keep the aperture as low as possible. It makes things much more fun and challenging. Pic is my setup for this image >>4320069 this one took 9 flashes at f45 to expose correctly.


No online presence, I may eventually try to sell framed wetplates or something, but I'm still in the learning phase.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:06:01 16:18:34
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	0.3 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	320
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4320278
It's a plastic camera but it's lens is sharp, its compact and it takes a nice auto exposure. Sadly the market is fucked for film p&s and finding a mju for $100 is already difficult.

>>4320254
fellow /p/ortland bro?

File: KodakProImage100-21 (1).jpg (3.43 MB, 2048x1549)

3.43 MB JPG

>>4320266
who /ck/ here?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:29 16:59:20
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4320308
pretty nice, what lens(es) do you bring to games?

File: KodakProImage100-25.jpg (3.02 MB, 2048x1359)

3.02 MB JPG

>>4320323
Pentax IQZoom 130M p&s

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:29 16:59:22
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4320283
Nah East Coast. I just heard they were really good.

>>4320368
That's kind of crazy, I didn't know that they were such a big deal. They were just recommended to me by someone I knew and I thought it was just a local thing.

File: 20240602_133501.jpg (1.07 MB, 2476x1800)

1.07 MB JPG

GUYS! I think found out the secret.

You just use a plain piece of glass instead of a real GG and a 10x loupe when you're doing macro work! You can't see the image without the magnification, but once you put your loupe on the glass it's absolutely crystal clear.

The normal GG couldn't resolve the super fine details required to get proper focus at this level of magnification. This problem was a major roadblock for me. I was basically taking my best guess to decide on critical focus.

I put my fresnel in front of the clear glass, and it produced the most amazingly clear and bright projection I've ever seen! Very cool.

Now I just need to source/order a super high flatness piece of glass, and I will be set.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:06:02 13:35:01
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	640
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4320344
this is a really nice shot. i love the contrast of foreground and shadows

>>4320370
Interestingly I think blue moon is the only remaining “official” Minox and 16mm stills film retailer (not counting eBay boomers who also do it). Cool place.

File: _1a_0029.jpg (1.26 MB, 2996x2000)

1.26 MB JPG

>>4320344
I’m surprised you had enough light to use pro image 100 in a zoom point and shoot cam, usually they don’t like to take photos under 200 iso.

Anyways this is Portra 160 with a 100mm f2.8 Nikkor at the Tower of London

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:01 13:41:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

>>4320392
Just tested my clear glass "gg" and IT WORKED. Perfect focus on my first try. Euphoric.

File: KodakProImage100-23.jpg (2.41 MB, 2048x1359)

2.41 MB JPG

>>4320419
not every shot came out as I'd have hoped (pic rel), it was a partly cloudy day but I got a few keepers

>>4320405
Cheers! this was one of my favorites from the day. I like the contrast and the crowd reactions I think it was an Ohtani home run

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:29 16:59:21
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4318704
hey nophoto that's a shit for brains take fucking pleb

>>4318980
>>4318732
are yall the same guy? love the photos you take. This is kentmere, right?

>>4320470
>>4320471
Post more

File: 7Q0A6966.jpg (4.29 MB, 3577x5365)

4.29 MB JPG

>>4318819
Got around to 3d printing a proper film holder to continue the “scanning” fun and what a difference it makes. It’s a simple pull-through holder but that alone makes is such a easy process, did a test strip of 6 shots in like 15 seconds, could be even faster if I tape the thing down to not fiddle with it. Neato. Was even thinking of dropping coin on the expensive valió/film supply ones, but this one works darn well enough for my liking. 3d printers are pretty handy bros

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:02 22:57:33
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Ilford Delta 3200 -5.jpg (740 KB, 1211x1500)

740 KB JPG

>>4320232
I am, but colour is so expensive here and summer sports are just uhhh cricket? that's about it. Also lack the cool fun stadium stuff. Also also there's a heap of stuff that's only on at night, with kinda shitty lights. pic rel is 12800 ISO and 1/60 f3.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4320555
>>4320457
sidenote as a baseball fan living in NZ, the idea of going to a game at one point in my life is like #3 on my bucket list

>>4320555
>12800 ISO
really incredible result bro. Calculator says it was EV3.
Did you use AF camera?

>>4320600
Pentax 6x7, I wish it was AF haha

>>4320600
>Did you use AF camera?
oh, nevermind. I just realized it is not tele-lens

>>4320602
wow. I wish I had your eyes lol

>>4320604
Only got the one good one if that makes you feel better aha, right eye cant focus on anything at all

>>4320555
I enjoy this one a lot. Great work.

>>4320606
I feel your pain. ASStigmatism is a bitch, can't focus properly even with Mamiya 645

>>4320616
yeah, I got that combo'd with keratoconus which I got treatment for to stop it worsening, but forever cursed with that different horizontal and vertical focal plane shit. Only really hate it cause it makes using rangefinders and viewfinders in general ass, wish it was my left eye haha

>>4320555
I normally shoot b&w myself so I can dev at home. I just went through a roll of Ilford Delta 3200 shot at 6400 iso at a Speedway event last night that I hope came out ok.

>>4320557
how does a kiwi get into baseball? what's your team? I talked with a kiwi family on holiday last October at a LA Rams game it was during the rugby wc I think NZ had just beaten France that morning and they were stoked

File: 20240331-KodakTmaxP3200-27.jpg (1.79 MB, 2048x1353)

1.79 MB JPG

>>432069
Pic from the game

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:03:31 21:20:37
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4320619
I used to be an A's fan but currently homeless, since before the move stuff, lost all faith after they traded out Davis and Chapman etc for coward choices. And i'm just a sports fan in general, Baseball is one of many but one I want to see a game of more than others

And your delta should be fine! It pushes really well, you just get fatter grain

File: Ilford Pan F Plus-3.jpg (539 KB, 1500x1177)

539 KB JPG

Oh I guess I should post some more pics.
Some Ilford Pan F of some teams in the hockey club I play for

1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:03 01:13:40
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Ilford Pan F Plus-5.jpg (493 KB, 1177x1500)

493 KB JPG

>>4320623
2/3
Used a more basic inversion method when scanning this one, not as big a fan of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:03 01:13:42
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Ilford Pan F Plus-8.jpg (500 KB, 1500x1192)

500 KB JPG

>>4320624
3/3
All on 6x7

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:03 01:13:44
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4320552
looks nice, what camera are you using for scanning? looks like 24MP
I thought about making a scanning rig and was wondering if 24MP is enough for my pixel peeping needs, thought about getting a Lumix G9 and using pixel shift mode, but it seems that 24MP looks just fine

File: 26611e364b3c0f44c0e5f792e(...).jpg (34 KB, 662x712)

34 KB JPG

>>4318694
You guys ever have any extremely retarded/unpleasant experiences while out shooting?

>be me, probably 6 or so months back
>recently got a Nikon F2 on the cheap (meter non functioning) and a K1000 from an antique store because sticky mirror
>fixed k1000 with lighter fluid and popped some machine oil in it after
>go out to take test shots w both
>using k1000 primarily
>random guy runs up asking "Hey is that a K1000!?"
>"Yeah, just testing it out"
>for once I'll be talkative, I dont really know any other filmfags near me
>maybe he'll be cool
>guy proceeds to follow me for 2 city blocks spewing factoids about Pentax and complaining that Amtrak and, by extension the local train station aren't very "railfan friendly"
>dont have the heart to tell this guy to fuck off for some reason, normally I would
>he keeps blabbing about Pentax as a company and little details about K1000s
>he asks what all Im carrying so I show him my F2
>"Yeah Ive never really trusted Nikons like I have Pentax"
>literally next frame in the Pentax and it jams
>he then asks where I get my film done
>I tell him about Local Lab A and he scoffs
>"PSSHYEAH, I ONLY GET MY SCANS FROM LOCAL LAB B."
>look at his insta later
>snapshits from cosplay cons
>guy leaves a few mins after
>tfw subconscious held out because it knew some divine comedy was about to go down

File: portra 800346.jpg (1.59 MB, 1658x1061)

1.59 MB JPG

>>4320714
ah so it was you... DELETE THIS.

Nah for real, lmao that is why I almost never approach people when I see them with a film camera I don't want to be a nuisance.

But I had a lot of people asking for my camera and such, even more when I am out with a folder camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:11:22 18:38:58
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20240603_105321409.jpg (551 KB, 2312x1736)

551 KB JPG

Ok, what now?

>>4320702
Og EOS R rated at 30mp. I didn’t bother going full 1:1 coverage this time cause my tripod is janky to move the centre column while something is on it, so maybe closer to 0.8, cropped a bit of white space and such. 24mp should honestly be plenty. If you’re really autistic about it with a decent enough macro you could stitch even larger.

>>4320730
Never heard of the stuff, the ol boomers on photo.net/photrio etc also don’t seem to know what to make of it over the years from my quick search. Where’d you get it?

>>4320278
It pisses me off too, but I'm kind of on the fence. I'm slightly leaning towards let the tiktube posers have them, if they have money to burn on an overpriced shitty camera, then they probably have money to burn on film, and more demand for film is good for everyone. Same reason I grudgingly tolerate lomofaggots, even though their "aesthetics" and "ethos" make me wish that they would all do the flip immediately.
In any case they will either get bored and dump the cameras for cheap again once it's no longer cool and does not get them views, or they will stick to it and keep using them, which in and of itself isn't a bad thing. Meanwhile we can keep using our real cameras.

File: polypanmorelikepolyshityo(...).jpg (2.22 MB, 2220x3403)

2.22 MB JPG

>>4320730
now you have a soviet archival clear PET base film with no antihalation layer and fomapan100-esque grain. it's thinner and flimsier than normal acetate base and some dev reels will offer too much friction and cause it to jam after you're pushed in the ~24th frame. enjoy your blooming highlights and meh handling ergonomics. perfect for b/w slide reversal dev because of the clear base.

>>4320730
Looks like a fun film. You havr a shitload of it, so get testing, and post some results!

https://filmphotographyproject.com/get-your-glow-polypan-f-bw-film/

You have a bulk loader, right?

File: weeee.jpg (1.93 MB, 3600x3600)

1.93 MB JPG

>>4320729
I almost never get people asking which I prefer. Not opposed to people asking about stuff but most 'interactions' are random people asking why Im taking pictures of or near their property. Not really upsetting, more often funny.

>out taking snapshits
>see a nice window shot
>frame it up, take shot
>"EY BUDDY."
>explain to him what Im doing
>"AH JEEZ I THOUGHT YOU WAS WITH THE INSURANCE COMPANIES OR SUMTHIN. WAS MAKIN SURE I WASNT IN TROUBLE"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D850
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.3.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:02:14 16:51:51
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	60.00 mm

File: 2011_0017_019.tif.jpg (544 KB, 1500x1000)

544 KB JPG

>>4320735
The mystery of its origin is the strangest thing, I first shot it in 2010 and nobody knew for sure what it was and where it came from then, and nobody knows now.
Anyway I loved it back then and had a search alert set for it for the last few years and finally got a hit recently.
I was saving one last roll from the batch I bought in 2010 like a holy grail, now I can finally go shoot it without regret lmao.
>>4320742
Not scammed kurwabro, see above, I got it because I knew it and wanted more of it for a long time. And I never had any issues loading it into my Paterson reels.
The photo you posted looks amazing, not sure if you were trying to prove some point with it, but I love it and it's exactly what I want out of it.
Also trust me, it's nothing like Foma, and I've shot a lot of it.
The reversal potential is great, R100 feels pretty cumbersome sometimes and my dev kit is almost finished.
>>4320743
Yeah I'm glad I can go wild experimenting with it now without savoring every last roll of it. Here's a random shot from 2011 with it.
I have a bulk loader but only for 30m/100ft rolls, not 90/300, so I'll just need to take care to not fuck it up while unrolling by hand in my bathroom.

File: 14832137015_ed1fe739a8_b.jpg (158 KB, 677x1024)

158 KB JPG

Anyone ever use a cooke portrait lens?

My wetplate portraits come out unpleasantly sharp and contrasty when I use my more modern lenses. It's kind of a cool look, but also not really. I found a cheap imagon that's in the mail, but the temptation is there to try out a legendary brass barrel lens.


>>4320749
Good luck! It looks like a fun film to mess around with.

File: MK19343-L.jpg (262 KB, 1800x902)

262 KB JPG

>>4320783
This sounds a lot like what Nikon DC lenses do, but I don't suppose you can adapt them to your camera.

File: cookePS945_examples.jpg (329 KB, 1600x1300)

329 KB JPG

>>4320792
It's a soft focus lens. This may be a better example of the effect. The effect can produce very pleasant portraits.

I'm unsure as to whether or not there is a seperate sharp to soft dial on the old cooke portrait lenses, or if it just softens up with the aperture.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1300
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2006:03:15 12:05:31
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1300

>>4320792
>>4320804
>>4320783
just put vaseline in your lens like the old days

File: A09ec7cacf69c4016942b51d3(...).png (650 KB, 748x1000)

650 KB PNG

sent to repair mom's old vito cl

this is also busted. I'm looking at this one (https://aliexpress.com/item/32642526415.html?)
do u bros think it would work

File: 86_Imagon_10.jpg (289 KB, 1470x1482)

289 KB JPG

>>4320805
No. I want a big shiny brass lens for my collection. I think the imagon I got will be all that I need tho. A good cooke lense is over 10x the price, so I'm not too sad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Deskjet 2510
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2480
Image Height	3508
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2022:01:30 18:27:55
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1470
Image Height	1482