[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: LIGMA.jpg (1.38 MB, 1851x2129)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB JPG
This is the Film General Thread, aka /fgt/
/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is bullshit
>negative film ages the same as positive
>black and white worse than color
>slow films worse than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years and everything else
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited (i.e. 0.2-0.4ml of 1% Benzotriazole sol. per liter of color dev)
>slide/positive film should be overexposed and pulled too.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process (10-30ml)
Please post photos taken on film in this thread. It's OK to ask about film gear in this thread.

You retards like thread questions now, so what's your favorite NEW color film stock?


>old thread
>>4323036

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 22:15:06
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1851
Image Height2129
>>
I am about to go on vacation and will only take an F3 with a 50 kinda wish I'd bought a 28 like a month ago but eh
>>
File: 20240523_0005.jpg (1.46 MB, 2591x2809)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB JPG
Haven't tried any new color stocks.

In other topics, in case of need can I use spent fixer against vampires?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeMinolta
Camera ModelScan Dual II
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:05:23 14:34:29
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2591
Image Height2809
>>
>>4325784
I've heard Phoenix looks quite nice in e6 if you shoot it with some filters
>>
>>4325784
>retards
I resent that.

> what's your favorite NEW color film stock?

Take the Phoenix 200 pill lads. This isn't my photo but the point remains. Embrace grain, contrast, warmth. I've got three more rolls coming and I'm going to experiment with a diffuser to see what happens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 135i
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:01:13 16:55:38
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width970
Image Height1455
>>
>>4325800
>Embrace grain, contrast, warmth
I refuse. It's the first Sovcolor-compatible color film released in 30 years, and I sure as fuck will develop it to normal contrast even if I lose 3 stops of speed in process
>>
File: yashicaoops.jpg (3.25 MB, 4000x4000)
3.25 MB
3.25 MB JPG
Just getting to grips with a Yashica D I just bought, and I forgot to advance the film a couple times. This turned out interesting lol. I never really understood the multiple exposures thing but this effect seems like it could be cool. Easy to do anyway when the shutter and frame advance aren’t coupled.
>>
>>4325804
This looks very cool desu
On that topic, how are you supposed to meter double exposures? I'd guess the film loses sensitivity after the first one right, so do you just add more stops on the next one?
>>
File: portra_aged_like_milk.jpg (354 KB, 1000x2176)
354 KB
354 KB JPG
Every time I take my wooden camera out in public a boomer comes along and asks about it
>hey is that a panoramic?
yeah (gentle dripping of maranara down my leg begins)
>did you make it yourself?
uh huh it's uh 6x12 I'm just doing a test roll now (can feel the tendrils teetering on the brink)
>nice, nice I remember back in the day (insert story about shooting weddings on 645 in the 80s)
oh yeah that's cool (individual strands of pasta dribbling on the floor)
>so you got a website or you sell prints or what? Where do I look at your pictures? Must have a big enlarger for that
uh no I just scan and have them printed on my wall and sometimes I put them on this forum called pee and I guess I got a flickr but nobody uses flickr (torrent of spaghetti is now coating the ground)
>oh well, you'll get there one day sonny
y-you too

Should I make up business cards with my flickr on them or something? I feel bad the boomers seem genuinely interested but I have nothing to show them.
Pictured: 4-year expired portra 400, underexposed because I forgot my light meter, converted to b&w because color looks like absolute dogshit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 16:11:58
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4325819
Do it, or carry a sharpie around and write your info on their arm.

Can we see your wooden camera?
>>
File: QXDDMYSVVM-IMG_0101.jpg (164 KB, 900x600)
164 KB
164 KB JPG
>>4325805
multiple exposures seems to have been a big thing in the 80s and 90s judging by how prominently it was put as a feature on cameras and manuals and such. My EOS1, top of the line pro camera, has a dedicated control button combo for multiple exposures, rather than drive mode (which would go there later). Its really interesting. According to the EOS 1 manual, a good starting point (but not for every situation) is
>Double: -1 stop
>Triple: -1.5
>Quadruple: -2
it can do up to 9 though and i guess you'd just adjust accordingly. can't even think of when you'd use 9 shots in one image, maybe tracking the moon or something?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width900
Image Height600
>>
>>4325819
>I feel bad the boomers seem genuinely interested but I have nothing to show them
business cards are homo tier, carry an album of 8x10 fibre prints and give them one when they ask. ez.
>>
>>4325823
Golf swing type shit in a burst. 11fps with the power grip on a 1v would be pretty cool.

Do you like the canon 1 button layout? I can't decide if I like it or not. I do not like how I need 2 fingers to change settings on the left side of the cane.

>>4325825
That would be pretty baller to handout 8x10 prints. Maybe your "business card" could be 4x5 prints with your info written on the back. A little less bulky than 8x10...
>>
File: woodencamera.jpg (315 KB, 1200x800)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
>>4325825
lmao I have a hard enough time not losing my light meter, cable release, etc.
>>4325821

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Lens Size10.20 - 30.60 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 16:54:29
Exposure Time1/20 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length19.34 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2736
Image Height1824
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeProgram
Focus TypeClose-Up (Macro Mode)
Metering ModeEvaluative
ISO Speed RatingAuto
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeUnknown
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeMacro
Subject Distance0.520 m
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed192
Image Number759-4991
Color Matrix33
>>
File: shitpost.jpg (3.76 MB, 6720x4480)
3.76 MB
3.76 MB JPG
>>4325829
i have a 1d and 1ds mii which i got used to, so it's not TOO far a stretch to step backwards, but there are some quirks like you mention. drive mode being a side button under the flap instead of where "ME" is like on the newer cameras, and the custom functions. aside from those though it's not bad actually. but like i said, i'm used to 1d layout. coming from another system it might be shit, not having dedicated buttons and needing to memorize combos, etc. especially in the dark or when needing to change fast. I'm only taking literal shit snaps with my cameras for a laugh so it's perfectly fine.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 17:18:22
Exposure Time1/8 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4325830
That's really cool. Do you get sharp images from it? If I made a camera like that I would get way too autistic about tolerances and end up machining the whole thing out of aluminum, spending 100 hours at the Bridgeport. Still cheaper than a linhof 6x12/6x17
>>
a story in 4 parts
>1/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5100
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:16 15:02:44
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias1.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4325838
who /sp/ here

>2/4
>>
>>4325840
>2/4
>>
File: 1715458471011149.jpg (4.33 MB, 9478x4881)
4.33 MB
4.33 MB JPG
>>4325834
At f/45, pretty sharp. I included a helicoid but all attempts at bokehwhoring at f/11 or whatever have resulted in missed focus. Here's a full rez "scan" I had uploaded previously. There is probably more detail in the film that I can't capture with my scan setup.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4325840
Fail.
>>
>>4325841
>3/4
>>
>>4325845
>4/4

>>4325844
just building tension

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5100
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:16 15:02:47
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias1.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4325784
>what's your favorite NEW color film stock?
you people shoot color...?
>>
File: 000217820008.jpg (1.52 MB, 3130x2075)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB JPG
me and fiance in the garden on old film that was heat damaged, we ran to get under the teepee and didnt quite make it but it looks kinda candid because of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:15 20:31:49
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 000217820013.jpg (999 KB, 3130x2075)
999 KB
999 KB JPG
it was Fujicolor Superia 400, no longer in production

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:15 20:27:19
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 000217820004.jpg (1.47 MB, 3130x2075)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:15 20:29:24
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Film_024.jpg (4.99 MB, 3130x2075)
4.99 MB
4.99 MB JPG
>>4325784
I really, really, really like this image

New fujifilm 400 iso film

Fujifilm Discovery 312 Zoom

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4325865
LOL
>>
What could cause this delta 100 to come out fuzzy after enlargement?

I definitely had the grain focused. I think it’s the negative which is fuzzy.

My process:

10:30 DD-X 60mL/240mL Water @ ~20C +/- 1C
0:10 Ilfostop 15mL/285mL Water
3:00 Ilford rapid fixer 60mL/240mL Water

It was in a 600mL tank however, so it was half full, but I figured it would be OK since the film is still submerged. But maybe the air in the tank had something to do with it?

See pic related, I don’t believe there should not be a single in-focus object in the frame. Look at the stripes on the jacket, or the bread in his hand, it almost has a halation effect.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1600
Image Height1200
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4325886
And I don’t think it’s the camera, because I got pic related back from the lab last year.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:01:20 12:24:57
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height859
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4325886
did you stop down the enlarger?
they can be soft wide open
>>
>>4325890
The enlarger was f/8. Same effect at f/11.
>>
>>4325891
And I also got these enlargements from the same enlarger last week, from a different camera, hp5+ at 400. Maybe the camera lens is actually just a bit soft?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 12 Pro
Camera Software16.1.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:14 09:55:00
Exposure Time1/33 sec
F-Numberf/1.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/1.6
Brightness7270/130903 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4325886
Did you place the grain focuser on top of a sheet of the paper you're using to make prints? What enlarger lens are you using?
>>
>>4325910
Yep, I did this too, placed a scrap sheet on the easel first, focused the grain, and removed the scrap sheet.

I think the enlarger lens is a 50mm nikon something. But my enlargements last week for a different roll came out perfect, I can even make out the text on the street signs. (Might not be able to see in pic due to compression)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 12 Pro
Camera Software16.1.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:14 09:45:48
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating320
Lens Aperturef/1.6
Brightness1.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: W45E100BUD2302b.jpg (2.57 MB, 1681x2500)
2.57 MB
2.57 MB JPG
>>4325819
One of the reasons I got rid of my Rolleicord was constant interruptions by old timers wanting to talk about it. Also happened sometimes with older 35mm's. Nowadays I shoot 35mm with a Minolta Dynax and everything else with a field camera, nobody cares about the former because it looks like a DSLR and the latter seems to give a strong incel aura or something because people stare at it but do not appoarch.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEPSON
Camera ModelPerfection V800
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution457 dpi
Vertical Resolution457 dpi
Image Created2023:06:07 19:04:42
Image Width14051
Image Height20845
>>
>>4325919
Shit. You can use the grain focuser to sort of tell if your pics are out of focus. It takes a bit of practice, but it can definitely help you troubleshoot.
>>
>>4325851
You don't?
>>
>>4325823
Dear God Canons were always so fucking ugly design-wise
>>
>>4325932
they both look like shit desu, fucking blob ass fisherprice looking garbage. canon peaked with the A-1 then just gave up and started pegging used bars of soap at the design engineers until they had a product.
>>
File: Asakusa-35.jpg (716 KB, 968x1500)
716 KB
716 KB JPG
>>4325784
Idk if it counts as new but I like the Ume 800 from Film Never Die I got when I was in Japan last year

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:01:31 12:16:57
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
>>4325784
at what point is it rely worth it to develop your own film and make analog prints at home? I have to wait 4 weeks until i get my results from my local shop. They don't even make 120film prints.
>>
>>4325968
That's just another remjet removed 500T respool lmao. Nice shot though.
>>
>>4325974

Worth is subjective. Is it a fun and interesting hobby for you? Do you want full analog control over the finished product? Be prepared to drop a few hundred dollars on equipment. You can try find a community darkroom first, if you haven’t developed before
>>
>>4325928
I disassembled the enlarger lens. Fungus everywhere. I removed it with diluted domestic bleach. Made some more enlargements. Seems to have improved slightly, but still soft images. Could still be the camera, I’ll try shooting another roll.
>>
File: DSC_9200-positive.jpg (1.15 MB, 1488x995)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>>4325784
>You retards like thread questions now, so what's your favorite NEW color film stock?
Adox Color mission the only one I liked so far. But I am expecting a lot of improvements on Phoenix

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.2.0
PhotographerSHARONOV
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern706
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2022:10:03 23:49:19
Light SourceUnknown
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: D3S_9519-top-1200.jpg (145 KB, 1200x728)
145 KB
145 KB JPG
>>4325938
we had good times in product design, we had to hold on to them

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>4326001
Same desu. The ex-chief technologist of Svema (the guy who designed Svema's first and only C41 film. I wish I could somehow ask Harman to hire him so that DS100 would be manufactured again) said that based on what he knows about Ilford, he's not too surprised about a color film from them, and that it should have been a relatively easy task for them, especially since it's doesn't have masking. Since Phoenix is basically Agfacolor Neu, even sensitivity is similar to the first chromogenic films, except the gelatin is hardened way better, Ilford still has a long way to go. Tasma often had issues with masking back in the day, and they had much mire resources
>>
File: byu25seiq47d1.jpg (101 KB, 1024x1024)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
What are we thinking boys?
>>
>>4326003
Pic unrelated I guess
>>
File: p17.jpg (155 KB, 590x846)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
https://youtube.com/shorts/rQHSj2HzUpE?si=2BumtlLAqp_5gk6N
Yep, it's... a half-frame camera aka dogshit photo quality in an aesthetic body.
>>
>>4326007
>Bokeh on the dial
Lmao what
>>4326009
We already knew that, they said that they would use the same body for a full frame down the road
>>4326006
Bro is just agfacolor
>>
>>4326010
>Bro is just agfacolor
Wha
>>
>>4326007
it better be inexpensive, I wouldn't pay over $200

do we know if it has autofocus?
>>
>>4326057
>autofocus
lmao
>>
>>4326061
if my iPhone 15 Ultra Plus can do it why can't this camera
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2301.jpg (1.53 MB, 1320x2000)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB JPG
Another day, another abandoned farm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 21:49:58
Image Width6792
Image Height10224
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2303.jpg (1.88 MB, 2000x1321)
1.88 MB
1.88 MB JPG
imagine the
D E E R K E D S
E
E
R
K
E
D
S

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution43 dpi
Vertical Resolution43 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 21:55:09
Image Width10272
Image Height6816
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2304.jpg (1.86 MB, 2000x1319)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB JPG
Also rifle-armed octogenarians ready to shoot at anything that isn't wearing a $800 realtree suit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution43 dpi
Vertical Resolution43 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 21:57:37
Image Width10272
Image Height6792
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2306.jpg (1.61 MB, 1317x2000)
1.61 MB
1.61 MB JPG
Alternative is to take shelter and get crushed by falling rafters.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution43 dpi
Vertical Resolution43 dpi
Image Created2024:06:16 22:01:48
Image Width6792
Image Height10272
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2307.jpg (1.64 MB, 1341x2000)
1.64 MB
1.64 MB JPG
Do the needful.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:06:17 19:53:32
Image Width6792
Image Height10128
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2308.jpg (1.17 MB, 1321x2000)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB JPG
What a comfy place to fall through the floor and then get buried by the collapsing walls.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:06:17 19:59:28
Image Width6792
Image Height10224
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2309.jpg (964 KB, 2000x1284)
964 KB
964 KB JPG
Think about the amount of upvotes this shit would pull.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:06:17 20:02:50
Image Width10128
Image Height6792
>>
File: DX8RPX1SEP2312.jpg (1.35 MB, 2000x1289)
1.35 MB
1.35 MB JPG
Last one before running back to mommy's apron. Too many deer keds.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:06:17 20:11:03
Image Width10224
Image Height6768
>>
>>4325932
I dunno man I love the 1 series I think it still looks good today with the gradual evolution to the 1dxiii. And they feel wonderful in the hand. Wielding a 1ds I feel like I could take out a hobo with it if I needed to
>>
File: scan0053_01.jpg (1.68 MB, 3000x4726)
1.68 MB
1.68 MB JPG
>>4326093
>>4326094
neat, i've taken one of those in my barn as well
not as good as yours though
farms and abandoned such are kino

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-4000
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:17 19:44:13
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3000
Image Height4726
>>
File: DX8KCP23107 (2).jpg (2.06 MB, 2000x1307)
2.06 MB
2.06 MB JPG
>>4326107
The funny thing was there was a bedding made of dried moss and not too old beer cans lying around. Someone camped out in this remote shit shack for god only knows what reason. Sadly as usual, the main buildings of the farm had been sold and dismantled, only worthless buildings like barns remain. For how many abandoned farms dot these woodlands it's very rare I get to actually explore anything other than half-collapsed barns and saunas. But the alternative is shooting city scenes and I hate people.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2023:08:28 21:45:07
Image Width10175
Image Height6790
>>
This is my film stash. It matters because I rescued them from brick-and-mortar store shelves before they disappeared from there forever. The 200iso one was very expensive for some reason.

The Kodak funsavers are over $30 in Walgreens and crappy as always so I left them on the shelves.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone SE (2nd generation)
Camera Software16.3.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:17 12:33:34
Exposure Time1/17 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating640
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness-2.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length3.99 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width390
Image Height312
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4326079
Fuck autofocus. I’m pissed because I took portraits of children and adults with my autofocus camera and it turned out my piece of shit focused on the background most of the time. Also it’s viewfinder has an optical effect where the center mark moves to the side when it is positioned vertically. The vertical portraits are off center now.
>>
File: IMGP3325.jpg (3.91 MB, 4787x3166)
3.91 MB
3.91 MB JPG
test roll for one of them kiev 4 i bought. cool camera but i think i dig SLRs more. i dont have a light meter so i used a phone app, worked pretty well, at least with semi-stand development (rodinal 1+200)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-70
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:15 12:10:32
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4787
Image Height3166
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: 000217820010.jpg (775 KB, 3130x2075)
775 KB
775 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:15 20:46:20
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4326007
>half frame
>f/3.5
>manual focus
>autoexposure only
>says "film camera" on top
>$500
lol. lmao, even
>>
>>4326275
What if you forget that it's a film camera and you can't take pics because you brought an sd card instead of your portra 400?
>>
>>4326007
I shall stick with my Olympus Pen EE-3 for half frame shooting and pocketability for the time being
>>
>>4326275
These niggas really went and put “bokeh” on the dial, that should tell you assuredly what kind of mong this thing is aimed at lmao
>>
>>4326007
Not for me but anything that pushes more people to buy film and encourage production of it - I'm down.
We need entry level simple new film cameras so the masses buy film and Kodak/Fuji still sees a reason to keep making it.
>>
>>4326275
not manual focus. Zone focus like an olympus xa2 or toy holga
>>
>>4326306
it's both, you set your distance with the switch - macro, food?, portrait, two people, group, landscape - and then manual focus on your subject
>>
>>4326323
How do you focus without reflex or a rangefinder?
>>
>>4326344
Zone focus, a wide angle lens, and a small aperture.
>>
>>4326349
That’s not the same as “then you manual focus on your subject” like >>4326323 said.
>>
>>4326350
Also
>inb4 well you have to set the zone mNually, duh!
No, faggot you and I both know that is 100% not what is meant by calling it “manual focus”, don’t even funking try it.
>>
Who the fuck do they think they are?!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width750
Image Height756
>>
>>4326323
my bad it's just zone focusing, their use of manual focus threw me off

https://www.35mmc.com/17/06/2024/pentax-17-review/

>The lens is manual focus only, with click stops at the focus distances indicated via a set of fairly familiar symbols. These symbols are visible on top of the lens as well as through the viewfinder. I say “fairly” familiar as the flower for macro, different sized people and mountains are all symbols I have seen on cameras before. I am not sure I have seen the knife and fork for the close-up distance between macro and portrait though – a sign of times where it has become popular to photograph one’s dinner, perhaps? Focus distances are also indicated below the lens in both meters and feet. With the 25mm f/3.5 lens, it should be pretty easy to focus, even at closer distances.
>>
Can I apply the shutter speed / aperture values I get from a handheld light meter to any camera / format? Or do I need to do some sort conversions for focal length etc.?
>>
>>4326418
All the same regardless of format. I found the most accurate way is using a mirrorless camera to meter though (Olympus Pen-E are like $40 and tiny and u can live view the exposure).
>>
>>4326419
Thanks! I'll look into a mirrorless as well.
>>
>>4326418
the focus triangle parameters are all interchangeable regardless of format or technology, the only time this changes is if you're doing whacky shit like using telephoto converters or speedboosters. the effective depth of field changes between formats, e.g. the bigger the format the bigger the bokeh balls. the exposure is constant.
>>
>>4326306
>>4326323
>>4326386
zone focus is a type of manual focus you silly /p/edants
>>
>>4326431
See >>4326351
>>
>>4326426
Or large format and long bellows extensions
>>
>>4326426
>the bigger the format the bigger the bokeh balls
if you were talking lens equivalency then sure
but since you're being technical — for the same focal length and aperture, larger formats have a larger crop of the image circle
since the bokey size is the same relative to the image circle, the size relative to the composition is smaller
>>
>>4326437
What about a folding medium format camera (Mamiya Six)? It has bellows.
>>
>>4326436
See >>4326431
>>
>>4326350
The term you do not know, but wish you did is focusing helicoid.
>>
>>4325784
wtf is this oppic?
>>
i need density curves for pan f for different gamma/developing times but of course they only give one in the data sheet. am i supposed to make my own or some shit
>>
>>4326444
the bellows don't move on a Mamiya Six
>>
>>4326464
Try asking jeeves
>>
File: 20210411_203548.jpg (14 KB, 400x400)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
What's the best non-default lens for the x-700?

Online I've seen people rec either the 28mm or the 20mm
>>
>>4326612
The one in your pants.
>>
>>4326443
true, but no ones ripping out their RB67 and going, hmmm 50mm should be good for a portrait. medium is fairly intuitive so you don't really have to think about 80 being your standard. MFT cucks on the other hand, "hurr durr guies do you think this 2.6mm is wide enough" and everyone has to do a double take and go yeah sure but you should have just bought FF if you wanted shoot skateboards and homeless people.
>>
>>4326303
This
But 4chinners are too retarded to grasp the concept, like
>>4326010
>Bokeh on the dial
>Lmao what
Yeah, Bokeh on the dial
This is not for me or for you, this is useful for someone who doesn't understand shit about f-stops but still wanna have their "blurry background effect"
And if these people buy more film and keep Eastman, Harman and Fuji making more films I'm in
>>
>>4326612
wtf is a default lens?
>>
>>4326638
The stock lens that came in the box with the kit, AKA the 50mm f/1.7 MC Rokkor
>>
File: IMG10940.jpg (774 KB, 1655x1655)
774 KB
774 KB JPG
>>4323392
developed my first roll (HP5+)
took some super crappy scans with my K-1 just to see how they turned out
>150mm f/11 1/500s + CPL

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-1
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)108 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:18 17:24:20
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1655
Image Height1655
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationLow
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
File: IMG10939.jpg (685 KB, 1671x1671)
685 KB
685 KB JPG
>>4326643
>150mm f/5.6 1/8s +3EV flash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-1
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)108 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:18 17:49:28
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1671
Image Height1671
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationLow
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
>>4326644
Cute motherfucker
Get closer tho
Lots of space around
>>
>>4326646
The tricks and traps of a 1:1 format.
>>
>>4326646
but that's already min focus distance…
>>
File: Mongler.jpg (71 KB, 455x600)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
>>4325784
MFW - new film camera from Pentax.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEastman Kodak Company
Camera ModelKODAK DC290 Zoom Digital Camera (V01.00)
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2003:01:25 15:37:36
Exposure Time2711/100000 sec
F-Numberf/3.0
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias1/2 EV
Subject DistanceInfinity
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash
Focal Length7.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width600
Image Height791
>>
>>4326640
aka the kit lens lmao
>>
we just keep winning filmbros!
>>
>>4326660
I would be confident that this would be cool if it came from anyone but MiNT. If it’s anything like their other products, it will be chinkshit prone to defect with the spectre of a good product hidden deep within.
>>
>>4326647
yes, but... there's lot of space all around
hence why
>get closer
>>4326648
>oh
>>
File: Unbenannt-1.jpg (1.07 MB, 3637x3174)
1.07 MB
1.07 MB JPG
Found a seller selling these bulk films
each 200 €
which one should i go for ?
One of them even is a 400ft 1000meter one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 24.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:19 05:56:29
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3637
Image Height3174
>>
>>4326720
>400ft
i meant to say 2 of them even are
1000ft (400meters)
one of them is tagged 98...does that mean it's the exp date ??
>>
>>4326723
Hard pass on 20 year old color film. Fresh vision3 is not really that much more expensive...
>>
>>4326723
>one of them is tagged 98...does that mean it's the exp date ??
yes, vision and vision 2 were discontinued fucking ages ago. you're buying 1000ft of ISO 25 film that will be ISO 0.2 by the time you get through it, offer them $20 for the tin
>>
Do you guys think that it would be useful to get a developing tank that only allows me to develop 1 sheet of 8x10 film at a time?
It seems like a major inconvenience, but it would also take all excuses away from utilizing the classic zone system combined with push/pull processing.
>>
File: IMG_2115.jpg (101 KB, 819x1024)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>4326733
I’ve seen someone do a one sheet tube dev tank for 4x5 3D printed, such a thing might work for 8x10 also and be a lot less fiddly to load. And you could economize chems further by adding a central core or the like. Picrel.
I’ve actually watched the instructional video for this thing you posted cause one came up for sale locally, seems like such a pain in the ass with all the little fucking tabs and aligning everything, needing to be done in the dark.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width819
Image Height1024
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4326737
I use the paterson tank thing that holds 6 4x5 sheets, and don't mind it at all. This one would only be used for 8x10, and it seems pretty easy to load up. You don't need any of those divider pieces.

I would just bite the bullet and get a jobo setup if I wanted a tube passed developing apparatus.
>>
File: DSC02480-2.jpg (680 KB, 1488x992)
680 KB
680 KB JPG
MinoltaXK
Minolta HF 300mm
Svema100
rodinal1+100(30m+30m)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7C
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:11 18:39:06
Exposure Time1/8 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness-1.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4326746
Could be cool as a heavily cropped print.
>>
>>4326748
Nah. Not with that lens. The resolution and coating are not so great.
I am waiting for sigma 400mm apo (minolta mount), will recreate the photo, there are also 4 stork chicks hiding in the nest.
>>
File: canon_514xl_sound.jpg (32 KB, 420x529)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
Anyone here done super8?
I picked up a Canon 514XL-S, still have to work it out and get some film,
>>
>>4326646
>obviously tlr
>Get closer
Gold
>>
File: 1000016034.jpg (508 KB, 998x2000)
508 KB
508 KB JPG
snappindoggos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeGoogle
Camera ModelPixel 6a
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:13 19:43:31
Exposure Time4169/250000 sec
F-Numberf/1.7
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating211
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Brightness1.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.10 m
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.38 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width998
Image Height2000
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
File: IMG10934.jpg (946 KB, 1613x1613)
946 KB
946 KB JPG
>>4326790
>obviously
it's a bronica sq-ai with seiko ps 150mm >>4323392

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-1
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)108 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:19 07:30:00
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1613
Image Height1613
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationLow
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
>>4326733
At that point why not just tray process in the dark?
>>
>>4326612
The Albinar 28mm is excellent, and Minolta's 135mm lenses are great for portraits. The f2 one is especially great but even the f3.5 is solid. If you're not a coward you'll consider the 50mm f1.2 for that razor thin depth of field.
>>
>>4326797
I was considering that, but my darkroom is too small to do that comfortably. When I get my larger darkroom built I'll probably do tray dev.
>>
File: XE1RPX1122312.jpg (1.39 MB, 2000x1315)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>4326835
As someone who has the 1.2/50 MD, it's not really worth that money unless you want easier focusing in the dark. It's effectively the same thing as the 1.4 but way more expensive and just as garbage wide open.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution44 dpi
Vertical Resolution44 dpi
Image Created2024:02:06 21:39:44
Image Width10248
Image Height6768
>>
>>4326612
I recommend 35-70mm f3.5, you can get it cheap and it's sharp as fuck at all apertures even at f3.5 it's pretty good
>>
>>4326790
>Yashicas have a pair of close-up lenses adapters
>Mamiya C330 is a TLR with interchangeable lenses
>Hasselblads also shoot 6x6 as well as lots of other cameras, TLRs or not
Also
>>>4326795
>it's a bronica sq-ai with seiko ps 150mm
>>4326790 LMAO shut up, faggot
>>
>>4326795
This looks great anon I wanna see a better scan. How do you like the SQ?
>>
>>4326788
Yes, on a Quartz 8xl
Motherfucker died right on the set, had to drill him a new asshole and soak the speed regulating contacts in white spirit just to make this shit work again. Why?
>>
some acetone and a bit of lube on the shutters pins under the bottom plate and it seems shutter capping is no more hehe
>>
File: IMG_20240619_120524388.jpg (373 KB, 2312x1736)
373 KB
373 KB JPG
I'm going to fucking kill myself.
>>
>>4326943
oof
>>
File: CNV000015.jpg (4.08 MB, 3038x4425)
4.08 MB
4.08 MB JPG
>>4326943
RIP

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:05:24 19:51:01
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4326943
Fixer first?
>>
>>4326943
I did a batch of sheets that came out like this when I let my dev go bad once. Now I test every time.
>>
>>4326943
I don't see anything..
>>
>>4326950
That’s what I’m thinking. Or a camera not firing the shutter maybe?
>>
File: IMG_20240619_130007191.jpg (253 KB, 1736x2312)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
>>4326950
>>4326969
>>4326954
It was bad chems. It was R100 process (B&W reversal from Foma). I'm not 100% sure what failed but it was either developer or bleach. I knew shit was fucked when there were no images forming during re-exposure, but I still went through the motions to the end. There are just slightly visible traces and streaks of developed silver near the ends of the film (so on the outside of the reel in the tank), but nothing resembling an image.
I know I did not mess up the process, I was super autistic about the temperatures and times and mixing solutions just prior to use.
It fucking hurts, I never had such catastrophic failure and never lost a single roll in over 20 years of home developing. I don't really feel like testing if it's the dev that's gone bad (I could presumably replace it with any other b&w dev) or the bleach, I'll probably dump the rest of the kit and develop the few remaining rolls of R100 I have as negatives.
>>
There is one difference between ultramax and the new fujifilm 400. In broad daylight, fujifilm 400 récords trees and bushes with very saturated green and more volume. Ultramax records them more accurately with a yellow hue.
>>
File: IMG_1927.jpg (1.46 MB, 3041x1339)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB JPG
>>4326974
Mistakes happen lad, just chin up and keep at it. I recently did one where I mismeasured how much dev to put in my tank along with only one reel in it, picrel. Not as bad as yours but I’ve done blank negatives before also. Part of the journey now you’ll never forget

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 13 Pro Max
Camera Software17.3.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)77 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:04:25 20:25:59
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/1.5
Brightness1.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio3
>>
File: IMG10931_01.jpg (649 KB, 1617x1616)
649 KB
649 KB JPG
playing around with overriding EXIF on export from darktable, for film scans

>>4326927
the version where the dark slide interlock didn't work looked better
it's… fine? I don't have much perspective
my main difficulty so far has been dealing with the limited number of shutter speeds
originally I planned to get a GX680 and I still do (for me film is a way to take images in formats and with cameras I can't digitally)
but since this got pushed on my for free I figured I'd use it to get comfortable with film
(for more background, friend I got it from also got it broken for free from his school, and did the minor repairs himself; he hadn't used it in years)
and yeah I'll be getting a proper scanner soon, and going to be doing color as well (doing my own dev of course)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeZenza Bronica
Camera ModelSQ-Ai
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:19 18:15:00
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Focal Length150.00 mm
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length150.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1617
Image Height1616
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationLow
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
>>4326986
>no LensMake or LensModel
ree
don't want to have to use manufacturer-specific tags for those
>>
File: 7Q0A7040.jpg (2.76 MB, 2000x3000)
2.76 MB
2.76 MB JPG
>>4326986
>originally I planned to get a GX680 and I still do
based. Do it. get model iii, the better film back with interchangeable masks and everthing else is the best.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:19 17:33:26
Exposure Time1/8 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4326992
yep but I think I'll pick up a bigger tripod than what you're using there
>>
>>4326981
Yeah, I need to get over it, nothing I can do to save them now. I'll let myself be upset about it some more though, I was looking forward to a lot of them, and the chems decided to quit on me the one time I develop three rolls at once (I usually do one or two).
And like I said I never lost a single roll before, out of over 800 I shot, so it stings. I hope this will remain the one and only fuckup in my lifetime.
>>
>>4327011
lol yup that’s my 3LT travel tripod, I was too lazy to take my monorail off the big benro and pack it for this. It’s a bit wobbly but the ball head worked better than I expected lol. Definitely get a beefy pod. Preferably with a geared head, I’m saving up that will be the next item I buy I think.
>>
File: unexposed.jpg (454 KB, 2000x1333)
454 KB
454 KB JPG
>huh that's weird, isn't the tape usually on the inside of the roll?
>oh well it's probably fine
>tfw developed an unexposed roll because "hurr the foil packet is open it must be exposed"
>>4326943
thanks I feel a lot better now, at least I didn't lose any pictures
>>
>>4326932
worth the effort?
the canon is heavier and bigger than i though, i might take it on a few trips and shoot a roll or two while im up there
got any hot tips, or is it pretty much just point and shoot and pray that it works?
>>
File: W45FP1SUM2404.jpg (4.47 MB, 2764x3500)
4.47 MB
4.47 MB JPG
>>4326943
Unfortunately I know that feel, once got a batch of Foma-brand Rodinal that was completely inert and this happened. Sometimes the world is out to fuck with you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEPSON
Camera ModelPerfection V800
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution295 dpi
Vertical Resolution295 dpi
Image Created2024:06:19 20:35:23
Image Width23547
Image Height29777
>>
File: W45FP1JAN2404c.jpg (3.88 MB, 3500x2762)
3.88 MB
3.88 MB JPG
Should have waited for a few seconds longer for the sun to shift.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEPSON
Camera ModelPerfection V800
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution295 dpi
Vertical Resolution295 dpi
Image Created2024:06:20 06:48:46
Image Width29775
Image Height23540
>>
File: W45FP1JAN2406c.jpg (3.9 MB, 2787x3500)
3.9 MB
3.9 MB JPG
God damn drop of water.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeEPSON
Camera ModelPerfection V800
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution296 dpi
Vertical Resolution296 dpi
Image Created2024:06:20 06:48:22
Image Width23572
Image Height29615
>>
Would it work? Could I shoot two different film stocks at particular speeds such that I can develop them both in the same tank for the same amount of time?

E.g. delta 100 @ 160 and fp4+ @ 200 both developed for 12 minutes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1142
Image Height1532
>>
>>4327038
>Foma-brand Rodinal
lmao Foma-anything is shit especially Fomapan
>>
>>4327056
yeah absolutely, you just need to make sure you have the minimum amount of developer per roll in the tank for your dilution to get the results you want
>>
>>4327067
It's all fun and games until you need to shoot sheet.
>>
>>4327038
That sucks, R09 was my first developer and one that placed me firmly in the one-shot developers camp. That said it lasted forever, never had trouble finishing the bottle, and in general I never heard of Rodinal going bad (except the homebrew ones maybe).
>>
File: JapanBW043.jpg (125 KB, 800x800)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>>4326943
I know that feel bro.
Rodinal gone too old.
I also fucked up 2x220 rolls of E6 using out of date chems, still images but straight trash.
I also fucked up 4 rolls of b&w from a trip to japan my first time using steel reels, kinked the film all the way through so most of it was touching itself, pic related was my only photo of mt fuji
>kys *would* fix the problem though...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number1132529712
Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2015:12:23 08:32:34
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width800
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModePartial
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeTimed
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Self-Timer Length10 sec
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129
>>
>>4326992
>that fucking tripod
no wonder your photos with it have all been dogshit
holding your camera still will always be more important than using a bigger one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness1.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1444
Image Height2048
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4327081
I know anon, I have a bigger sturdier tripod I just got too lazy to bring it that day. I was only doing lens comparisons anyway nothing critical and for that purpose it worked out fine. Begs look okay with a loupe. Haven’t scanned anything from this camera properly yet. Getting a 120 film holder is my next to do, might just have to 3d print one
>>
Thoughts on the F100 for a beginner to photography in general?
>>
>>4326974
Try cutting a test strip from a leader, you can see if it's the dev or the bleach instead of throwing it all out
>>
>>4327148
it works. it's easy to use. it's good if you shoot a lot of very pushed film.

but it is ugly as fuck. so fucking ugly. you couldn't find an uglier camera if you tried.
>>
>>4327148
It'll expose frames of 35mm, go for it
>>
>>4327148
>muh blob
>>
>>4327148
I started out with a F90x, and it's still my main camera. You can later expand your collection with older F-mount stuff, so you have one camera house for b&w, slide film etc.
You can also aqcuire G-glass and a full frame digital, and use the glass on the F100.
>>
Contemplaying dipping a toe back into film photography after being out of it for basically two decades. I'm considering a Canon P - anyone have one they'd want to share any thoughts on?
>>
File: 2304 082923 6-28.jpg (1.39 MB, 2400x1610)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>4327175
minolta maxxum 5
>good lenses
>joy of reflex
>i regret giving mine away
>>
>>4327183
>muh dog abuse blob
>>
What's the best film for shooting a concert I don't know lighting conditions of? Something like HP5+ that can be pushed 1~2 stops after if it was dark?
>>
>>4327191
Delta or TMax 3200. I've been to too many small and medium sized venues where even 6400 wide open was barely cutting it. If you're lucky and it turns out to be a slightly better lit one then you can pull to 1600.
If it's a large professional theatre, arena or stadium and you're close enough to the stage then yeah HP5+ may do it.
>>
>>4327191
How big is your speedlight?
>>
>>4327192
That's a small club with slightly garbage indoor lighting and the place near stage is guaranteed. Still need 3200 for 1.8?
>>
>>4327175
Just get a Leica and stop coping with japcrap clones
>>
File: ektar 100mm f2.8 af macro.jpg (1.06 MB, 3032x2033)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB JPG
>>4327185
>dog abuse
Retarded schizophrenic
>"blob"
The maxxum 5 is physically smaller than a sony a7iii, has flash sync a stop higher, and the max shutter speed goes 2 stops higher. The lenses are more widely available, stupidly good, and cover more ground. The lens selection also includes the smallest and lightest autofocusing 500mm prime lens on earth.

The canon P is a rattly collectible metal box that takes M39 soviet lenses, that's it. So is a zorki 4.

>>4327191
Cinestill 800t! It's a meme, but it works well at 1600 and 3200.
>>
>>4327194
won't hurt, because 3200 films (at least those mentioned) have a pretty wide latitude (i.e. you'd over-expose and under-develop if you only needed say 1600)
>>
>>4327197
Ok, delta 3200 it is.
>>
>>4327198
But look at the kino halation
https://gridfiti.com/cinestill-800t-pushed-to-1600-3200/
>>
>>4327199
How's it compared to vision 500t? 800t is harder to get where I am.
>>
>>4327198
look up some comparisons of the two, if you're working with 35mm and never used either you might be better off with TMax
>>
>>4327201
1. Tmax is a bitch to get where I am.
2. I am shooting half-frame for shits and giggles alongside digital so I don't expect good results anyway.
>>
>>4327200
its the same, you can push that bitch to 1600 and still get nice results
>>
>>4327183
Hey, nice picture of dog.
>>
>>4327199
>gridfiti
>the faggots who watermark their gay ass websites on reddit users pics then beg for money and affiliate sales
>all that effort and 2 likes on the article
lmao fuck these stealing retards
>>
>>4327153
Zoomers are making that style it cool again

Vintage SLRs are very Millennial Dad Anon, get with the times
>>
>>4327208
Its ok, the redditors enjoy it, bike cuck style.
>>
>>4327203
>>4327199
This article just describes underexposing the film. Pushing is done in development. You can't push in-camera.
>>
>>4327228
retard
>>
File: 3SistersOnE100 (1).jpg (4.59 MB, 2048x2040)
4.59 MB
4.59 MB JPG
Averaged between highlights and shadows for both stocks but E100 just can't handle the contrast.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:20 16:39:57
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 3SistersOnAerochrome (1).jpg (4.82 MB, 1950x1921)
4.82 MB
4.82 MB JPG
>>4327251

Aerochrome despite being more than a decade out of date still handles the range better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:20 16:42:24
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4327230
It's not pushed until you overdevelop it, and most labs won't push C41 film. If you develop your own, it's about 30 more seconds per stop.
>>
>>4327148
What I learned to shoot on like 15 years ago and I’d still recommend it.
>>
>>4327251
Its called a GND
>>
File: HROnAerochrome.jpg (4.64 MB, 1960x2000)
4.64 MB
4.64 MB JPG
>>4327256

You can GN on this D.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:20 16:57:00
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: HROnE100 (1).jpg (4.78 MB, 1950x1943)
4.78 MB
4.78 MB JPG
Brb I'm going to use a handheld GND filter to get the bottom 1/5th of that scene properly exposed.

Nah, I should have just gone color negative but I didn't have that loaded.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:20 17:09:17
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4327261
Is this your blog?
>>
>>4327261
Who does the scanning?
>>
File: 33.jpg (2.45 MB, 1599x1100)
2.45 MB
2.45 MB JPG
>>4327196
IM MAXXUUUMINGGGGG
>>
File: RubyOnPortra400 (1).jpg (4.83 MB, 1950x1943)
4.83 MB
4.83 MB JPG
>>4327265
You're free to post as many photos as you'd like, if you have any.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:20 18:07:03
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 000020.jpg (3.08 MB, 3625x2433)
3.08 MB
3.08 MB JPG
I feel like rainy night city shoots are cheating with how good they turn out.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2024:06:20 19:00:32
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3625
Image Height2433
>>
>>4327278
Is this an SQ-A?

i like it
>>
File: 1708983216058960.jpg (1.89 MB, 4000x2250)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB JPG
>>4327153
>but it is ugly as fuck. so fucking ugly. you couldn't find an uglier camera if you tried.
I don't know, my zx-50 isnt exactly winning any beauty contests

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width4000
Image Height2250
>>
>>4326788
>auto exposure motion picture camera
fucking why? super 8 can produce lovely albeit dogshit resolution images but I would not trust that pos with exposure given the cost of film.
>>
>>4326986
how come nobody ever made a camera that records exposure information onto the frame like the quartz backs literally everything had from the 90s on?
>>
File: 3SistersOnE100 (1)s.jpg (2.83 MB, 1920x1913)
2.83 MB
2.83 MB JPG
>>4327251
>>4327252
the E100 still looks sick though, you can push up the shadows slightly without it falling apart entirely, mostly you just need to correct the color casts.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:21 10:00:19
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
Just bought a new camera. Whats new with you guys.
>>
>>4325819
post flickr, also make an ig
>>
>>4327341
Same here, haven't got it yet. Canon P with a 50mm f/1.4, what about you?
>>
>>4327343
very nice, I just watched a video on one of those the other day.
I got a rangefinder too. Its some Japanese Leica copy called a Leotax and I got some soviet lenses too.
Is that your first rangefinder? Ive never used on before. I feel like Im fucking up every shot.
>>
>>4327341
My silver nitrate finally arrived, so I will be taking my first 8x10 wetplates tonight. New strobe and snoot for macro will be arriving tommorow. Moving from 1kw/s to 2.4kw/s. Should be good, and I have a really cool idea for a macro shot I will be attempting soon!
>>
>>4327341
ordered a 5pk of Tri-X in 120 and stocked up on rodinal, LMax developer, and kodafix
>>
File: 1712798606928896.jpg (2.47 MB, 3130x2075)
2.47 MB
2.47 MB JPG
>>4327341
got a 80-320mm long boi I need to try out, I'll probably take it out to the lake or riverwalk and do some boat watching

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
>>
>>4327344
Cool I've have a look. Yeah first rangefinder I've owned, so I've prepared myself to fuck up every shot for the first couple hundred lol.
>>
>>4327362
The trick is to combine zone focusing with the normal focus. You can start off by pushing 400 speed film to 800 and you should have a fairly large dof even with a 50mm.
>>
>>4327398
Thanks for the tip anon
>>
File: 000525580011.jpg (4.07 MB, 3089x2048)
4.07 MB
4.07 MB JPG
what part of the camera is leaking here - assuming this IS a light leak and not something else

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:21 01:28:21
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 000525570014.jpg (3.66 MB, 3089x2048)
3.66 MB
3.66 MB JPG
>>4327419
exhibit b

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:21 01:33:24
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 000675880019.jpg (4.1 MB, 3089x2048)
4.1 MB
4.1 MB JPG
exhibit c

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:06:21 01:36:07
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4327419
>>4327420
>>4327421
this is what I can gather is an early production nikon fm, likely 1977-1978
>>
>>4327252
>>4327251
Anon, I've seen posts of yours before, and you have some potentially cool photos, but their edits are always a bit too heavyhanded
Those 2 filmstocks have strong personalities and I see you're trying to get the best out of them, but in this pursuit they've become overdone
Just something to consider, feel free to dismiss it if you will
>>
File: 016.jpg (1.3 MB, 1250x1000)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB JPG
>>4327278
Here's what a color neg histogram is supposed to look like!
>>
>>4327419
Might be a problem with shutter. Look at negatives, does the leak continue out of frame and is it most intense up, down or in frame?
>>
File: P6200264.jpg (1.11 MB, 2000x1500)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG
>>4327341
Found this buried in a pile of clothes at a flea market with a 4€ tag. In another corner some absolute chucklefuck was trying to sell run of the mill compacts for 50€ a pop. Gonna put a test roll through and if it works (appears to be), it's time to cash out.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M5MarkII
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.6
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.5
Color Filter Array Pattern17148
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:06:20 17:33:13
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating500
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length14.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4608
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4327436
crazy how ricoh made plastic shit with a seizz brand name on it makes hipsters lose their shit
>>
>>4327356
What camera are you taking your wet plates with?
>>
File: 33daa0q83v7d1.jpg (163 KB, 1013x767)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
https://www.xiaohongshu.com/explore/6674d613000000001c034b32
>In the future, Nanning, Guangxi has one more local specialty: Fuji Film
>Fujifilm established a production line in Nanning and officially launched the Fujifilm series of new films C200 and C400; Nowadays, more and more people are paying attention to and trying to use film, and although Fujifilm has discontinued many products, this time it has started production of new film in Nanning, Guangxi, bringing benefits to film photography enthusiasts.
>Guangxi superstar company has been producing medical negatives, photo paper and other products for Fuji before, OEM Fuji series of civilian photosensitive materials, this time it is a restart of the production line, hoping that the price of film can be pulled down a little after localization.

It says new series of film, but then it says C200/C400...
>>
File: RubyOnPortra400 (2).jpg (4.47 MB, 1950x1943)
4.47 MB
4.47 MB JPG
>>4327428
Your blacks aren't supposed to be green.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2024:06:21 07:33:48
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4327427
Maybe, but this is what the scan came in looking like. This is straight from the lab. I didn't edit much. I'll get the film back this weekend and I feel like that's what it'll look like.
>>
File: IMG_0380.jpg (1.21 MB, 1800x2400)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>4327306
>implying
that's one of the reasons I want one of these >>4326992
then I won't have to make as many notes in my shitty little notebook

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone SE (1st generation)
Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:21 08:37:37
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
ISO Speed Rating125
Brightness3.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1800
Image Height2400
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4327474
That makes me wonder, surely the Chinese have made knockoff film stock? Anyone k ow if they have and if they're any good?
>>
>>4327464
Sinar P. IMO the Sinar monorail family is one of the greatest camera systems ever produced.
>>
>>4327511
Shanghai and Lucky and they’re usable, “good” would be up to the user to decide.
>>
>>4327511
Just Shanghai GP3. The rest is Vision3 or expired disposable repacks.
>>
File: 1700888583833399.jpg (1.54 MB, 2712x1724)
1.54 MB
1.54 MB JPG
>>4323036
Got my first film camera, pentax me super and shot my first roll.
They have a bit of grain to them, im unsure if its camera age, the film i used (kodak ultra max) or thats just how it is.
overall pretty satisfied, the satisfaction of click wind is going to bankrupt me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4327586
very nice man, keep it up!

the grain is from the film thats just how ultra max is, plus it looks like youre in full midday sun, that tends to amplify graininess, but honestly, your pic is nice, the colors are great, its in focus, not over or underexposed. Its good!

Dont stress about grain, its basically the reason film is so special
>>
>>4327544
There is lucky new film that I am not convinced that is not a repack of something
>>4327586
A film camera is only a black box that will expose film, grain has nothing to do with the camera but with the film stock, Ultra max is just like that.

Try Gold 200 for a bit less grain
>>
https://www.ebay.com/itm/395483623809
Talk me out of consooming
Or consoom it yourself
>>
File: lol.jpg (891 KB, 1000x799)
891 KB
891 KB JPG
>>4327488
Brutal self own
>>
>>4327663
>selling a camera
>almost all the listing pics are blurry
lel
>>
>>4327148
Get an fm2 instead
>>
>>4327251
>>4327252
>picrel
you're the most dramatic little bitch I've ever seen LMAO
you got a couple of quite polite comments saying they're overedited (because they are)
>first impulse is to whine and seek validation on plebbit
>not to improve based on honest feedback
ngmi
>>
>>4327694
??? rent free. I didn't think about you or this thread.

Literally none of this revolves around you. Go out there and take some photos!
>>
>>4327694

Oh now I see, it was so far out of my mind I didn't get what you were going at. Not much to over edit if that's basically how the scan came back. But I guess you didn't see the before screenshot above or the video. I'm glad I'm on your mind tho! Make sure to like my future posts!
>>
File: 5E7A6122.jpg (3.18 MB, 3732x2904)
3.18 MB
3.18 MB JPG
First 8x10 wetplate. It looks overexposed, but that's just because it is dry. Once I apply the varnish it will look perfect.

There's some flaws in the plate that I need to figure out, but it doesn't really take away from the image.

The 4x5 wetplates look good with my camera, but the 8x10 is too big. I would need a higher MP camera to properly photograph them. The image is incredibly sharp in person.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4667
Image Height3630
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:07:22 17:30:04
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias-1 EV
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
Color Space InformationsRGB
Focal Length150.00 mm
Metering ModeSpot
Exposure Time1/2 sec
FlashNo Flash
Light SourceUnknown
F-Numberf/8.0
>>
File: 20240621_172618.jpg (1.44 MB, 3624x1722)
1.44 MB
1.44 MB JPG
Here is the setup. I needed fairly extreme movements to get the focal plane optimized. It was excellent practice.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G998U1
Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height1800
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:21 17:26:18
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4000
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Unique Image IDXA8XLNF00SM
Image Height1800
Brightness3/50 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time1/40 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
ISO Speed Rating400
Image Width4000
Focal Length6.70 mm
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
File: 20240621_103448.jpg (1.63 MB, 1800x2858)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
If anyone else ever attempts to do macro view camera work the clear glass plate is an absolute must. It adds a few extra steps and major inconvenience to the process, but the level of focus it allows you is essential to pull these shots off.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G998U1
Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height1800
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2024:06:21 10:34:48
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width4000
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Unique Image IDXA8XLNF00SM
Image Height1800
Brightness0.3 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time1/40 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/1.8
ISO Speed Rating320
Image Width4000
Focal Length6.70 mm
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>4327815
>>4327816
>>4327819
I'm an amateur, I use 35mm and use lab devs so man this is so cool to me.
From set up to posting the dried plate, how long was the process?
>>
>>4327823
Setting the camera up was around 1-1.5 hours. It takes a long time because you have to use a 10x loupe on the clear glass and make miniscule tilt/swing adjustments to get the focal plane just right after you get rough focus and your magnification set. If the bellows are too long I have to walk back and forth between the front standard and the glass, which adds even more time. I really enjoy the challenge of it, so it's time well spent for me.

Switched backs to a 4x5 to take a test plate for exposure 20ish minutes
First 8x10 was another 10 minutes
Second was another 15ish with some slight changes
20 minute wash
Dry for an hourish
Photograph with digital camera and post!

Nailing the shot on my second try, and getting focus just how I wanted from the get go took many many hours of practice.
>>
Alright so I'm a retard.

>>4327344
I bought a leica clone that has an L-Mount. I was about to put a Industar onto it.
But I also bought this. An Arsenal Jupiter-8, which is a C-Mount, I believe. I figured I could get an adapter but so far no luck.

Anyone know of anything? Or do just have a nice pretty paperweight for the time being?
>>
>>4327854
>I was about to put a Industar onto it.
correction: I have already put the Industar on, works fine.
>>
>>4327819
how does a clear glass work for focusing?
ground glass I understand, I wouldn't expect clear glass to work the same but I don't do LF
>>
What's a good camera I should get as a beginner to MF? I see lots of people recommending yashica tlrs but usually that's a sign they're overhyped and overpriced now. On the other hand sample images I see online look very nice. Should I be looking at a rangefinder or slr instead? I was thinking about going for a 6x6 also, but I see conflicting info online about which is "worth it."
>>
>>4327884
Yashica TLRs indeed
Good, reliable, great glass, not very expensive (especially compared to other MF cameras)
They're worth every penny, and TLRs are weird enough to the average people so that they kinda blend in and people won't even notice you're photographing, so that's also a plus
6x6 is a great format, it'll force you to think differently about your compositions
They're also not heavy, you can carry them everywhere you go
I believe TLRs are ideal for starting on medium format
>>
>>4327884
Don't get a giant mirror slapper if you intend to walk around with. Like the other guy said a TLR is a great choice. Having a ground glass to compose and focus through is a wonderful experience. There's something special about them. If you love MF save up for a rangefinder as a second camera.

>>4327880
Honestly, I have no clue, but it just werks. The image is super bright through a loupe as well.
I ordered a piece of high flatness optical grade glass to see if surface finish has anything to do with it. Sadly I would need to order 20-30 pieces of to get one cut in a custom size to actually fit my camera, and they're probably around 250-300 dollars each. :(
>>
>>4327884
I've been thinking about a bronica s2a myself but they usually need repairs
>>
Haven't been shooting much lately
Lots of stuff happening recently, but I like a couple of shots from my last roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:06:21 23:44:54
Exposure Time1/200 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness2.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4327888
>>4327887
Thanks! Yashica it is. I mostly do landscape and nature so mirror slap is no big deal.
>>4327889
>repairs
Yeah avoiding that for a camera I'm learning a new format on would be ideal. I've heard tlrs can suffer from things like mismatched focus between the lenses too but I've still heard they're usually reliable.
>>
>>4327891
from the same day

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:06:22 00:36:44
Exposure Time1/20 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness-0.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: IMG_2120.jpg (190 KB, 668x1000)
190 KB
190 KB JPG
>>4327887
>>4327888
Ignore these pathetic chinlet DYELs crying about
>muh mirror too heavy
And get yourself into a real man’s medium format system.
Picrel, it’s on the left.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
PhotographerNathan Wright
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:01 22:18:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width668
Image Height1000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4327887
I agree with everything this anon said but still gonna recommend a Mamiya 645 as a first MF camera.
>>
>>4327899
>real man’s medium format system
>not even posting your own image because you don't even have one
opinion discarded
>>
>>4327899
6x8 is shit
>>
>>4327906
Your first mistake was thinking I’m a real man.
>>
>>4327908
Same to you.
>>
File: 20240505_131520.jpg (223 KB, 1111x833)
223 KB
223 KB JPG
>>4327899
Love the 680 but I already have a 67, I have the finder for it, adds another kg
>>
>>4328000
Sweet combo. Very based. Trolling aside I do also have a Yashica D TLR alongside my gx680 lol. Nice little thing. The lens is good enough to where the film is really what’s controlling the quality of your images, but I only shoot b/w. >>4325804 picrel
>>
File: 000015290025.jpg (4.7 MB, 3130x2075)
4.7 MB
4.7 MB JPG
I've just realised my camera is suffering from light leak but it is only happening in the middle of the roll. Does anybody know why that might be?

It seems this has been happening for awhile but since I usually shoot in black and white I didn't notice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.80.010 (180808)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationLeft-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
>>
>>4327899
NO. It is not the weight. They are just really awkward to handhold and then you have to get a stupid grip for it, and they're still awkward. For a first MF camera I would no recommend an awkward to handle one, or one with a lot of stupid safety interlocks.
>>
>>4325784
what should I look out when buying used lenses /cameras?
I once had a Voigtländer Bessamatic with different lenses, but I gave it away in a incredibly beta male and stupid teenager move. (I did not use the internet for anything but porn and thus I did not even know what I had)
How much would be a reasonable price for functioning voigtländer bessamatic or a some similar model? I don't know anything about photography yet, except that I don't want to use a digi cam.
>>
Does anyone have opinions about the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art vs the Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Art for film scanning?

I have used the 70mm in the past and was very happy with it. But I've since switched mounts and saw that in L mount I can choose between the two, anyone have any thoughts?
>>
>>4327899
>mirror slap lol
>>
>>4327899
After some research i've come to the conclusion that the only actual good MF cameras are the mamiya 7 and the hasselblad 500cm, and everything else is a janky waste of money that will transform from frustration to paperweight in less than a year
>>
>>4328042
Rolleiflex is pretty good. Mamiya 6 is also nice most of the time.
>>
>>4328030
Longer lens is more working distance, which may matter if you want to scan bigger than 135, for what it’s worth. I use a Laowa 100 macro which is surprisingly good for chinesium. Full manual but that doesn’t matter since you only have to set it once.
>>
>>4328051
>Longer lens is more working distance, which may matter if you want to scan bigger than 135, for what it’s worth
I just started shooting 120 film. But I'm struggling to comprehend the longer working distance to be an advantage for that, could you explain it to me?

It seems to me like the shorter focal length would make it easier to get larger film completely in frame, especially since my scanning mount only has so much travel.

>I use a Laowa 100 macro which is surprisingly good for chinesium
I was just looking at Sigmas because I've had good experiences with them in the past and they are sharp edge to edge and well controlled CA
>>
>>4328057
I guess working distance preference is subjective, my bad. I like to be able to clearly see my working area and have space to get my hands under the camera easily and all that. What you really should be looking at is magnification of your lens. Doesn’t need to be 1:1, but that’s ideal, then you don’t have to take multiple shots or crop or anything.
>>
File: eisenstein.jpg (275 KB, 790x900)
275 KB
275 KB JPG
Best bang-for-buck film digitizer?

The Kodak one first came to mind but it's pricey and pre-used ones are rare
>>
>>4327027
It depends
I like the look, but only when using reversal film, mainly Svema CO-32d in my case. It's not really possible to shoot anything "professional" because the 8mm look is too noticeable to not be an artistic choice. When projected though-whole different story. It's just goddaym. Same as with any movie projected from film, here you just have a smaller screen
>>
>>4328083
Sony a3000 and an enlarger lens.
>>
File: IMG_2123.jpg (80 KB, 894x721)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>4328083
>digitizer
What, you mean like one of these? Doodoocaca. Get a proper scanner or use a camera lad, please don’t waste money on these trash gadgets.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width894
Image Height721
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4328059
They are both 1:1 lenses. But I understand what you're saying now, the camera would be further away, so it's less of a tight squeeze between the camera and the film.

I think I'm leaning towards the 105 just because it's only $130 price difference and it seems like the better general purpose lens (better autofocus, aperture ring, etc) Plus it gives me access to a focal length I don't already have. idk I have a couple hours before b&h reopens to think about it.
>>
>>4328059
>>4328139
Just did a quick test of with my 100mm macro lens for my film camera and it just *barely* is able to fit the 120 frame in on my stand and I am definitely not getting the close to the 1:1 magnification. I may just go with the 70mm.
>>
what film do I order for my trip to the anime convention in LA
>>
>>4328137
Get a wall mount lightbox for your color positive 8x10 sheets.
>>
>>4328143
Is it inside? If so then youll be lit by a bunch of ugly ass fluorescent lights. So take that into consideration.
Cinestill 800 or something might be nice. Id imagine its gonna be a colorful event and that one does colors well.
>>
File: image.png (166 KB, 875x650)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
>>4328150
it's a mix of indoors and outdoors. I'm thinking of maybe getting a secondary camera for going between indoors and outdoors and having some low iso in one and high in the other. or maybe just go wide open to closed way down? I'm not well experienced in analog.
>>
>>4328159
>getting a secondary camera
getting or bringing? Its always nice to have another camera, so if youre buying one its a good reason to finally pull the trigger.

Remember that if youre going to f/3 or something your background will be blurred (good for a portrait) and your shutter speed higher (which is fine, but if youre using 800, make sure your camera has a fast shutter speed options)
>>
File: APC_0010.jpg (4.64 MB, 3024x4032)
4.64 MB
4.64 MB JPG
Well lads, weekend is off to a fun start. Picrel is what we’re doing. First time I buy colour film literally in decades. Probably going back to college in the mid 2000s. Normally do bw so I can dev it myself and save money, but for these two’s first rolls I decided to go colour. Should be good!
Btw I don’t know how it is in the rest of the world but here colour film feels like robbery. 36exp bw can be had for 8-9 bucks. 24ex colour is 12.99. Oof.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 13 Pro Max
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.3.1 (iOS)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2024:06:22 20:49:07
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.5
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/1.5
Brightness2.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
>>
>>4328171
What made you wanna do color after so long?

>colour film feels like robbery
Ive only been shooting for about 12 years, has this always been the case? I mean, I know film prices have shot up, but has color always been so much more expensive than b/w?

I do both and yeah b/w is cheaper but if you labdev then its more expensive than color.
>>
>>4328171
but you can dev color yourself too?
it's not that much more difficult
also nice 680, are you the same one who posted it earlier? dunno how many there are around here
>>
>>4328175
Yeah but I don’t see myself do enough to make the chems worth it and they supposedly like to spoil much quicker than bw chems. Not a value prop unless I decided to start bulk rolling colour. Or just throw completed films in the freezer until I have a bunch to do I guess. Is latent image loss a real thing?
>nice 680
Haha I shitpost about the 680 from time to time in different threads, but the last photo was me testing out my kit yeah. Bought it from a retiring photographer and it came with 6 lenses, shot a series of comparison fovs for subject and landscape. Then my retarded ass forgot to flip the mirror down and blacked out like half the roll. Fun times.
>>
>>4328166
I know the exposure triangle I shoot a lot of digital. Just not well versed in dealing in the confines of a set ISO. My om-2n only has up to 1000 shutter speed. not sure what i'd want for a second body.
>>
>>4328174
>What made you wanna do color after so long?
Well, Leica fanboys always talk a big game about how the lenses are special, and I figured now that I have some myself, colour’s probably the best way to see if they’re full of shit or not. As for film prices, I haven’t really paid attention to colour anymore really, because the last time I really was buying it with any regularity, you could still find it in grocery stores and gas stations lol. Back then black-and-white was the specialty stuff. Seems like these days it’s the kind of thing you save for more than just your typical snapshits, but that could be my inner poorfag talking.
>>
Took my long boi out to the lake and holy shit is it hard to shoot at 320mm offhand. I shot at the highest speed I could but I guess I'll see how I did later.
>>
File: 20240622_233912.jpg (3.78 MB, 4000x3000)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB JPG
Found these two things in the shed while cleaning out grandma's house. Never owned a film camera, gonna clean them up and play around with them. The seals are absolutely fucked and disintegrated, I ordered some adhesive felt and I'll fix that up as well as disassemble them and clean them later this week. The Minolta's vf looks alright but the Yashica's is kinda gross and fogged up.

I tried doing a diy battery (taped four hearing aid batteries together) for the Yashica and I don't know if I'm just retarded and did something wrong or if something's up with the camera because the battery check isn't working. Hopefully a more thorough cleaning in the battery compartment will help, it's a bit dirty in there too.
>>
>>4328137
Okay pretentious cocksmoker, I meant "proper scanner". Perhaps you could be useful and recommend something that isn't a trash gadget?

I just want to look at my photos in detail before I choose which ones to print.
>>
>>4328133
I'm talking about a scanner. I'm not using a digital camera.
>>
File: s-l1200.jpg (57 KB, 750x500)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>4327884
Fuji GF670
>>
>>4328258
>>4328260
>buttmad and rude for no reason
Well now you can just go and google it and fuck off, faggot.
>>
NEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWW
>>
>>4328260
>>4328258
A digital camera is literally a scanner.
>b-but i shoot film THAT MEANS I HAVE TO HATE DIGITAL CAMERAS
Yeah, I know, it sucks knowing they take the same pictures, often better, but you shoot film for the aesthetic and the process right? A digital camera is a low effort way to digitize a quick and dirty, nice enough scan but your serious printing attempts should involve an enlarger.
>>
>>4328258
Nikon coolscan. Or anything that has no bayer filter. Scanning film with a camera defeats the biggest advantage of film, full info about each of color channels
>>
>>4328321
Retard
>>
>>4328335
A digital camera is LITERALLY a scanner.

>>4328333
Most micro four thirds, a cheapo pentax DSLR, and old sony mirrorless all have 4 shot pixel shift for scanning things just without bayer and more shots for both no bayer and virtual smaller pixels
>>
>>4328337
scanners arent even as good as digital cameras
>muh 9001dpi
>takes fucking forever to do one frame
>comes out fucked up, have to make adjustments and try again
>still needs edited in ps
>vs
>snap at base iso
>highlights not clipped, is good scan ready to be baked
>shooting tethered with capture one so already ready to edit
>edit first frame
>all edits apply to subsequent frames
>fine detail looks the fucking same
>bbbbbut it wasnt pixel shift think of all the grains you didn't resolve
>lol lmao film isn't part of ur resolution digi wars
>puts film on an enlarger
>>
Why is “professional” portra 400 just as blunt as amateur film?
https://flic.kr/p/ppzhtm
>>
>>4328345
portra is really neutral, how you (or the lab, lol) renders it as a positive can make a massive difference between it looking like ektar or lomochrome and that's after considering the color casts of vintage glass
>>
>>4328345
user error
>>
I want to take indoor snapshots of people on film in ambient light. I’m poor and retarded so I ordered this for $83.08

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width750
Image Height493
>>
Should I trade my nikon f3 with a bad lcd for a nikon f photomic with a working meter
>>
>>4328439
I've seen this described as the 2nd best FD camera
I have the FTb QLn and my only complaint is it's big and heavy
>>
WHERE'S THE BLOODY NEEEEEEWWWWWWWW
>>
>>4328337
>>4328340
>>4328321
People this autistic need permission to use the internet
Just die in a fire already
>>
Does anyone use a phone for a light meter? What app? t. android (don't bully)
>>
>>4328439
nothing wrong with that camera but you should get yourself a flash. if you already have a light meter go with godox ones since they're pretty cheap and work with anything with a center pin. otherwise if you have no way to measure flash get a period correct "automatic" flash and you can just set the scale on the back to suit the subject.
>>4328544
no because of the above, with a sekonic I can meter multiple flashes handsfree and even measure the contrast ratio of a 3 point lighting setup without doing any bracketing or pulling out a DSLR to confirm it looks right. that said for night photography i have used "lightmeter" by vadim turko, as it calculates reciprocity failure for you.
>>
>>4328505
we won't need one for like a week, this is a slow board
>>
>>4328703
stfu nerd this is the fastest general and we deserve to be at the top of the pops
make a fucking new
>>
>>4328337
>A digital camera is LITERALLY a scanner.
no, it is not. It has a Bayer filter, scanners don't
>>
>>4328440
What battery for the photomic saar?
>>
>>4328769
When can we get a bear filter for our cameras?
>>
>>4328775
i dunno its the ftn one i think. the one that clamps on
>>
NEW THREAD
NOW WITH DOUBLE DUBS

>>4328877
>>4328877
>>4328877
>>4328877
>>4328877



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.