File: IMG_20170810_0003.jpg (2.17 MB, 3196x3177)

2.17 MB JPG

>>4333649
Nice.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan 9000F Mark II
Camera Software	IJ Scan Utility
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	5296
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017/08/10 17:33:48
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Width	5328
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5328
Image Height	5296
Light Source	Unknown

File: Gold200-21.jpg (1.83 MB, 3474x1681)

1.83 MB JPG

BIG ROCK :DDDD

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Fujifilm eSystems, Inc.
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:01 19:18:33
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _DSC3672-positive.jpg (3.37 MB, 4016x6016)

3.37 MB JPG

some more delta 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:06 18:35:39
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3660-positive.jpg (3.06 MB, 4016x6016)

3.06 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:04 23:01:24
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3659-positive.jpg (3.32 MB, 4016x6016)

3.32 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:04 21:20:40
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

wow I wish there was a thread question, that's my favorite part!

>>4333763
Here's the thread question for you!

Film?

File: Film.png (1.94 MB, 1079x1439)

1.94 MB PNG

>>4333773
>Film?
Film

File: 7Q0A7211.jpg (2.47 MB, 1833x2750)

2.47 MB JPG

i posted about it in the leica troll thread but perhaps better to ask here, is acros II a thicker or sturdier stock than other films? I went to load it the way i load all my other film and it jammed up my paterson reel nasty like. Wound it back up and tried again and jammed again in a different part. and it felt like it was struggling to load the full roll. never encountered that before, first time i use acros II. Thankfully it didn't ruin any shots that i can tell, but i'm not sure if i see any reason to pay more vs using kentmerre lol. Also 35mm not wide enough to properly shoot train cars i found out, them are some long fellas.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:06 23:13:33
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_2671.jpg (4.67 MB, 6245x5064)

4.67 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6245
Image Height	5064
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_2672.jpg (4.83 MB, 4963x6119)

4.83 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4963
Image Height	6119
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4333905
what in the hell is up with the noise here??

>>4333905
very nice, beautiful shot. Do you have more?

>>4333909
It looks like scanner lines, I don't think it hurts the image though.

>>4333714
>>4333716
Fairly nice conpositions, I would have tried to just capture the paddleboarders or the boats on the second (the overlap reads poorly and takes away from the nice framing you found) and balanced the three subjects better on the first. But I like these, there's something to them. Would love to see more whenever you get some.

>>4333909
lab fucked my shit up, only that roll came back with the scan lines

finally finished my test roll for my Leica CL, only to have both my local supposedly in-house labs tell me that negative processing is approximately 6 business days. i suppose this is what i get for finally trying to shoot a colour roll. fuck me. how does "in house" take so long lol

>>4333905
is it all chill if I print this one lad? Love the mood/vibe etc.

File: PXL_20240201_223453767.jpg (795 KB, 3024x4032)

795 KB JPG

>>4333784
Film

File: IMG_2674.jpg (3.9 MB, 6272x5086)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4333958
yeah go for it

>>4333912
thanks man

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:11 22:47:56
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6272
Image Height	5086
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_2673.jpg (4.01 MB, 6311x5118)

4.01 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:11 22:47:47
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6311
Image Height	5118
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: pentax p50.jpg (38 KB, 500x343)

38 KB JPG

boughted one of these and will put a pentax-m 50mm/1.4 on it. what will i think of it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4334134
will grenade with shitty 80s electronics in 1 roll or less. ALWAYS get mechanical for film cameras dingus! LOL

>>4334165
I went through 2 mechanical cameras for unrepairable shutter timing and film advance problems before finally getting an electronic one

Even if it breaks, hipsters hate them so it's cheaper to replace than anything i ever paid to have fine japanese watchmaking repaired

>>4334165
if a camera lacks batteries it lacks soul

File: img20240622_02023818.jpg (959 KB, 4306x2938)

959 KB JPG

>>4334165
this is bullshit. i don’t want to fuck around with every single mechanical setting on the camera when I’m shooting. I want to take a picture. If my [hipster electronic rangefinder] body dies, I’ll buy a new one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:24 09:22:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4306
Image Height	2938
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4333938
Buy a $40 sous vide and a $20 unicolor C41 kit. Takes me 20 minutes to dev 2 rolls at home and it’s like $1 a roll when you do the math.

>>4334181
>20 minutes to dev 2 rolls
with the opportunity cost calculated from assuming i could spend 20 extra minutes at work for OT pay, it would actually be $6.80 per roll :^)

>>4334182
Sorry I am not a Jew I do things for enjoyment not ROI

>>4334184
>He is not a jew
You'll never be a good photographer if you aren't jewish
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-conversion-process/

>>4334179
You probably can't afford a [hipster electronic rangefinder] to begin with, let alone a replacement. That's why people tend to steer clear of the M7.

>>4334172
cope. get your money up and get something good like a leica.
>>4334175
poor cope
>>4334179
retard cope

you are seething because I am right

>>4334200
>cope. get your money up and get something good like a leica.
that's hilarious, the one with a shutter that needed to be rebuilt or trashed *was* a leica, an m5 i bought at a garage sale for $50. i sold it on ebay for $700. the meter was also junk.

one look at leica forums shows leica owners end up having their cameras serviced every 50 rolls or so. a high price to pay for having to use goggles for most focal lengths that aren't "for" streetslop.

File: DSC05086editSMBDR.jpg (233 KB, 1600x1600)

233 KB JPG

Besides point and shits that I abused to absolute hell cause that's what you do with point and shits, I've never had an electronic camera die on me in 20 years of shooting film. The whole hurrdurr electronics bad is a meme

>>4334181
I’ll Have to see if anyone local has that kit. I don’t really shoot colour but since I got a Leica (even if it’s the poorfag one Lel) I wanted to use colour to see if the lens is all it’s cracked up to be. Supposedly the CL specific summicron-c is every bit as good as other Leica lenses. I still don’t think the economics of colour scale well for my uses but something to investigate more I guess.

>>4334214
I have a decent number of electronic cameras from the 80s and into the late 70s. They work fine. /fgt/ hates them because despite all the excuses and cope, most of these fags are just here to retrolarp, and you can’t do that with a plasticy auto box.

>>4334221
>Supposedly the CL specific summicron-c is every bit as good as other Leica lenses.

It has some glow and isn't amazingly sharp, but I love that lens so much it's all I use now.

>>4334199
I’m talking about a Contax you retard

File: _DSC3793-positive.jpg (3.68 MB, 4016x6016)

3.68 MB JPG

I've been in local botanical garden, really comfy location

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 20:28:17
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3788-positive.jpg (3.52 MB, 4016x6016)

3.52 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 20:43:55
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3791-positive.jpg (2.96 MB, 4016x6016)

2.96 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 20:28:16
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4334297
nice I like the cool tones in this one

File: IMG_20240707_130857.jpg (3.52 MB, 2682x2014)

3.52 MB JPG

Hey fgt rate my setup for an anime con

>>4334306
Based/10

I fucked up loading the film onto the processing reel and the they got scratched to shit. What's the best way to edit the scratches away?

File: Untitled27 (2).jpg (1008 KB, 3937x3982)

1008 KB JPG

I was going through the archive and pulled a few pics to share.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3937
Image Height	3982
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:19:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3937
Image Height	3982

File: Untitled22 (4).jpg (273 KB, 1847x1230)

273 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1847
Image Height	1230
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:18:47
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1847
Image Height	1230

File: Untitled (4)14.jpg (1.11 MB, 2658x2593)

1.11 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2658
Image Height	2593
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:15:18
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2658
Image Height	2593

File: Untitled (3) (3) (3) (3) (...).jpg (331 KB, 2657x1748)

331 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2657
Image Height	1748
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:12:32
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2657
Image Height	1748

File: Untitled (3) (3) (3) (7).jpg (1.09 MB, 4662x3174)

1.09 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4662
Image Height	3174
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:14:13
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4662
Image Height	3174

File: Untitled (3) (3) (3) (2) (3).jpg (995 KB, 4662x3174)

995 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4662
Image Height	3174
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:10:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4662
Image Height	3174

File: Untitled7 (4).jpg (975 KB, 4611x3069)

975 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4611
Image Height	3069
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:21:24
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4611
Image Height	3069

File: Image 71 (2).jpg (2.11 MB, 2435x3590)

2.11 MB JPG

All done. Hope you got at least mild enjoyment from viewing them.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2435
Image Height	3590
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:07:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2435
Image Height	3590

>>4334231
Which Contax camera is a electric rangefinder? I know you're not talking about the G1/2.

File: 1701831096870373.jpg (255 KB, 900x900)

255 KB JPG

>>4334182
i literally /earn money/ developing film at home because i do it while """"working"""" from home
b4 you ask, pic related. fuck the bossman

Are there any tips for under-exposing c41 on bright summer days? I hate how auto exposure over-exposes everything and darkening the shots in post sometimes isn't enough. Can I get away with 1 or 2 stops under exposure outside when it's very bright?

File: 20240707_0009.jpg (1.87 MB, 4439x3583)

1.87 MB JPG

>folder camera with light leaks on the the bellows
IT KEEPS HABBENING :DDD

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ScanJet G4050
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:08 00:38:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4439
Image Height	3583

>>4334181
>a sous vide cost $40 in 2024
hmmmmm maybe i should try color film
i haven't yet because i insist in doing everything myself
seems like i just need some filters and some patience for my bw enlarger too

>>4334491
>I hate how auto exposure over-exposes everything
Are you sure your light meter works fine?

>>4334494
Skip the sous vide, bring your chems up to 1 or 2 degrees above working temp and you're fine.

Digutal thermometer is nice tho get one of those.

>>4334468
the g1. how is it not an electronic rangefinder

>>4334496
>>4334181
How do I develop B&W at home when ambient temperature is higher than the chemicals call for half of the year.

>>4334539
Cool some water in the fridge, mix it to get slightly under the target temperature. Stop worrying and start developing. B&W has enormous latitude, it'll turn out fine.

>>4334542
Thanks anon I've been intimidated about starting to try it and that's been one of the reasons.

File: 640px-Contax_G1_0525.jpg (101 KB, 640x476)

101 KB JPG

I bought a Contax G1 with the 45mm f/2, supposedly one of the sharpest 35mm film camera lenses of all time, but the quality of the photos is complete dogshit?
The electronics on the camera works fine, it nails focus probably 90% of the time, but when I compare shots of Portra 400 on this camera compared to photos taken on my Canon A-1 with a 50mm f/1.8, the photos on the A-1 are FAR sharper, have a much smoother fall off with the depth of field, and just overall look so much nicer.
So what the fuck exactly is the appeal of this Zeiss lens? Because frankly it's kind of shit.

>>4334557
are you shooting wide open? I haven’t seen experienced that with the 90mm, 90mm results blew me away. try shooting f8-f11

>>4334562
Not often. I stay above f/4 when outdoors. Typically between f/5.6 and f/8

>>4334562
Also could you post some example photos you've taken with this camera if possible? And what film stock do you shoot on it?

>>4334563
example pic?

>>4334557
Post pictures retard. Are they all slightly out of focus or is there something actually fucky going on? Could be your beam splitter is out of calibration which would make it miss focus all the time. Zeiss lenses are known for fairly contrasty bokeh, basically the opposite of fd line of butter balls.

File: img20240623_19374358.jpg (3.41 MB, 4557x4382)

3.41 MB JPG

>>4334564
only pic I have on hand, scanned on a v550 so kind of soft

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:23 19:42:25
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4557
Image Height	4382
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4334567
>blue chromatic on shirt
Yeah your shits no longer aligned, look up the service manual and adjust it

File: 00010007.jpg (4.01 MB, 5397x3602)

4.01 MB JPG

>>4334565
>>4334566
>>4334567
Sample photo. 95% certain I shot this at f/5.6. Film stock is Portra 400. Scanned on a Fuji Frontier SP-500.
I don't know, just feels like none of the photos coming out of this camera have a clean look to them.
I'm going to try a low ISO film next and see the results.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:09 00:07:38
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4334570
interesting, you mean the blue around the edge of the shirt? is it easy enough to calibrate yourself?

>>4334572
You take the top off the camera, find something easy to focus on precisely 10m away, set the lens marking to 10m then use the set screw to reposition the splitter optics so it's overlapping exactly in the viewfinder, check it at 1m and infinity to confirm. 1m is like your fine adjustment so don't over do it or infinity will be wrong. Do not try to calibrate it at infinity only like you can with SLRs, it doesn't work because yours is a binocular system not a focusing screen.

>>4334575
do you have a copy of the service manual, can't find a G1 copy online

>>4334557
>Zeiss
It's literally Cosina licensed shit made for Kyocera. Contax is a meme and you fell for it.

>>4334571
This looks nothing like Portra

File: ZeissSonnarOpton1.5Vision3500T.jpg (2.29 MB, 2048x1411)

2.29 MB JPG

>>4334536
It's a hybrid system. And unreliable as shit. Which is why >>4334557 is currently struggling with one. Unreliable AF and unreliable manual controls too because the system itself is finicky. There's a reason why the Zeiss glass is sought after to convert to M.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:07:08 13:13:55
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _DSC3805-positive.jpg .jpg (3.36 MB, 4016x6016)

3.36 MB JPG

>>4333914
thanks anon
yeah I agree with the second photo, I was framing and they unexpectedly came into the shot so I went for it. I'll post few other frames from this roll, although the are not very interesting
also I had a dumb problem, visible on picrel, I was using a 49mm filter with 55mm adapter for my 35mm-70mm lens which resulted in this fucked vignette when shooting in on 35mm focal length, I used it with a lens that goes down to 28mm before and the vignette was slight so I thought it would be fine for 35mm
yet I think this shot looks kinda cool

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:08 19:38:17
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3798-positive.jpg (3.51 MB, 4016x6016)

3.51 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:08 19:38:13
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3799-positive.jpg (3.45 MB, 6016x4016)

3.45 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	772
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:08 19:38:12
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: seneca.jpg (2.53 MB, 2048x1361)

2.53 MB JPG

>>4333649
>marine edition
w

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: XX.jpg (3.96 MB, 1390x2048)

3.96 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: img20240623_20024619.jpg (912 KB, 4436x2886)

912 KB JPG

>>4334663
so it's an electronic rangefinder that you don't like. got it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:23 20:04:43
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4334722
Never said that straw manning my shit cause you don't get the point.

File: Screenshot 2024-07-08.png (496 KB, 1612x754)

496 KB PNG

>>4334588
checked and true now but Zeiss did, at one time, make some of the best lenses ever...

>>4334289
>>4334297
>>4334303

Your lens sucks ass. So much CA it hurts my yes.

Get a better camera.

>>4334770

Look at this dude talking like he knows shit about fuck. That looks like halation from cinema film stock with remjet removed.

File: 009.jpg (1021 KB, 1500x995)

1021 KB JPG

>>4334663
Mine has worked flawlessly for 10 years guess I just got lucky.

>>4334770
looks mostly like highlight bloom, in the third image on the left theres purple CA but branches against a white sky is like worst case scenario and typical of every non apochromatic lens.
and get your eyes checked lol

>>4334770
What are you talking about bro? That's called SOVL

>>4334770
this CA... where did it touch you?

File: 937824329832.jpg (81 KB, 712x1071)

81 KB JPG

From this year's Pikes Peak hill climb, angle could've been better but I kinda like it

So I could ruin the labs day by putting some bulk loaded ecn2 film in a gold 200 canister? Brb

>>4334770
>I recently learned what CA let me trying using it in a sentence.

File: tanak.jpg (1.57 MB, 2048x1344)

1.57 MB JPG

>>4334808
Yeah decent shot, looks like you were quite close which adds some nice 'speed' to it but why only 81KB scan?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Hey, /faggot/ r8 my film setup for dragoncon (deez nuts)

File: 20240708_223306.jpg (131 KB, 768x1024)

131 KB JPG

>>4334831
Whoops kuroba ate my pic

File: 000053090013.jpg (4.22 MB, 3130x2075)

4.22 MB JPG

>>4334830
File was blank when I downloaded it on my PC so I just took a screenshot. I think this one is fine on my phone tho
I believe the car in this pic was the #92 Porsche. Her turbo exploded.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	3130
Image Height	2075
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3130
Image Height	2075

>>4334831
>>4334833
unfunny

>>4334836
I'm being 10000% serious, I think the anime-goers would get a kick out of it tbqhwymbff

>>4334833
Lightsaber flash!

>>4334588
I have contax c/y system with a couple of cz lenses (planar, distagon and sonar). They performs amazing.
My friend used to have contax 645 system with planar and this was absolutely mind blowing.

File: seedarch-1.jpg (2.17 MB, 2048x1351)

2.17 MB JPG

>>4334835
Oh ok, typical technology in cars & computers, always ready to misfire at any moment...
That photo looks really nice color/scan wise. Love the tiny car detail and the interesting rock formation by the hairpin, reminds me of a little city skyline overlooking the valley.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

I just took delivery of a film camera a couple days having not shot film in literally over 20 years. Looking forward to seeing precisely how fucking turbo shit my first dozen rolls or so are and sharing them with you guys to piss on to push me.

>>4334722
lol nice focus on string

>>4334849
He is talking about all the "premium" point and shoot meme garbage like the G and T series, and he is 100% right. Kyocera did not even make them, they just bought the Contac and Zeiss licenses and had Cosina shit them out. Cosina has made some decent stuff to be fair but there has also been a whole lot of garbage.

>>4334868
The T3 is a great camera. Doesn't matter who made it. Sorry!

>>4334868
I will say that they are outrageously priced, and are not worth buying one these days even if they are a great little camera.

File: IMGP3756.jpg (1.12 MB, 3438x2507)

1.12 MB JPG

i think lotus flowers are neat

File: IMGP3710.jpg (2.54 MB, 5192x3455)

2.54 MB JPG

>>4334903

>>4334879
nice cope
>>4334883
yea. imagine the retards also thinking their cosina shit is sharper than canon L glass too lmfaooo

>>4334567
Reminds me of the crappy test shots all those youtube reviewers who said Contax was the best camera evarrrr. Just my test roll bro.
Is Contax has to be worse than Leica with the emotional cope attached to it. More photos online of the cameras resting on a table at some hipster cafe than shots actually taken with them.

>>4334770
Youre a fucking retard

>>4334915
your

>>4334598
I'm afraid it is. Straight out of the scanner, no corrections done whatsoever.

>>4334925
Love when dumb niggas claim shit like this on a color negative. Whatever preset you used made it look a little weird but definitely just Portra on an overcast day.

>>4334955
My bad I only remembered the foreground being blue/gray in tone. It isn't an overcast day, just in the shade.

File: img20240614_23195215.jpg (1.34 MB, 2917x4476)

1.34 MB JPG

>>4334912
i don’t get why everyone is so pissed at the mention of a Contax G. they’re nice cameras with good lenses (I don’t give a fuck who licensed what to whoever), built really nice, and are fun and quick to shoot. you’re acting like a woman

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:14 23:21:37
Color Space Information	sRGB

Should I buy a LNIB Argus C3 for $50

>>4334971
It's one poor person.

>>4334971
>uses photoshop
>on a Apple
>shoots Contax
>his best pic is literally nothing smears on a window dog shit
why am i not surprized?

>>4334978
>Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic
ur retarded

>>4334978
Anyone who creates weird head canon like this should be automatically disregarded. Sounds like one of those "people" that writes an essay about an entire group of photographers.

>>4334979
>>4334980
how much money did you spend on conta- err kyocer- err cosina shit to get mogged by economy FD mount glass? :)

>>4334982
you gonna post a pic or what

Gear literally doesn't matter just buy what's cheapest.
>t. Nikon n60 + nikkor 28-80 G

>>4334985
For 35mm film, yeah. Sometimes a small camera is nice instead of a large camera, and sometimes fast AF is also nice.

File: lol.jpg (639 KB, 2432x1622)

639 KB JPG

man the G1 shots on flickr are grim. how can retards look at the photos coming out from other people and pay over $100 for it? youtube meme reviews melted peoples brains fr

>>4334987
>1PM on Ultramax 400

>>4334983
They don't even shoot film.

>>4334987
>>4334982
You spend a lot of time thinking about this camera you don’t like.

>>4334996
its really funny

>>4334987
The Zeiss glass is phenomenal though, but yeah samples so far that have been posted have been abysmal. The system itself is finicky but some get used to it.

>>4335015
Zeiss and Leica 50 year old designs are better than modern Canikon pro glass, easily.

>>4335017
this but unironically

>>4335015
>>4335017
>>4335018
We are reaching new levels of cope not before thought possible.

File: Provia100Fexpired_001.jpg (133 KB, 1000x667)

133 KB JPG

I owned a G1. As a point and shoot left in autofocus it was alright. The viewfinder is abysmal and trying to use manual focus with it wack due to the shitty nature of controlling the focus via buttons. Also no focus aid in the viewfinder other than a distance readout. Sold it because it wasn't the right camera for me...but got damn that 45/2 was a gem of a lens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:28 18:33:55
Exposure Time	2 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Unique Image ID	cabfb8325545c6100000000000000000

>>4335020
>muh over corrected japshit

>>4335023
FD 50 1.8 mogs this for $30

File: ezgfws9.jpg (1.55 MB, 2247x877)

1.55 MB JPG

>>4335026
No it doesn't. I own an FD 50/1.8 too.

>pixel peeping 35mm film like a dumbass

I'm Poor So My AE-1 Program Is Superior To Your Contax General /IPSMAE1PISTYCG/

>>4335029
G 28mm?

>>4335033
No the 45/2

>>4335034
nice, color is insane

>>4335029
not him but you are huffing pure copium. you know that there have been adaptors for years right and people have dispelled this lenses performance. terrible distortion, curvature, nervous bokeh, CA. It's a 6 element vintage piece of shit. 7artisans makes things with better quality for cheaper brand new. wake up

https://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-zeiss-planar-245-t/

>>4335029
Is this supposed to be good? lol. lmao even

>>4335038
just say that you can't afford one lol

>>4335023
>>4335029
And here I thought Leicatards were bad.

>>4335040
cope. you wasted money on a meme fashion accessory. At least you could have got a Bessa if you wanted much better glass on your Cosina. but people like you only pose with the camera, not shoot them ;)

>>4335038
>https://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-zeiss-planar-245-t/

dude, the lens review is based on the guy adapting it to his A7. most of these issues are caused by the adaptation, these issues don't exist on the camera the lenses they were designed for.

>terrible distortion
"The Planar shows a small amount of barrel distortion, a setting of 4 corrects it very well in Lightroom. So distortion is nothing to worry about."

you guys are seriously retarded

>>4335044
>dude, the lens review is based on the guy adapting it to his A7. most of these issues are caused by the adaptation, these issues don't exist on the camera the lenses they were designed for.
Holy fucking cope hahahah

>>4335038
What exactly am I coping from? I said I didn't like the system and sold it years ago.

File: Zeiss_Planar_45mm_f2-8.jpg (299 KB, 800x533)

299 KB JPG

>>4335044
NTA but... This is shot at f/8. You really think that a kit zoom lens couldn't do this? Seriously?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:03:13 13:25:08

>>4335047
your retarded cope that adapting to full frame mirrorless is what is causing image failure. Do you understand physics? It's a tinny little 6 element piece of shit with crap 90s coatings. you are gagging on 12" of cope cock dude. go back to dpreview forums and youtube reviews you fucking idiot lMFAOOOOOOOOOO

>>4335048
i'm not even really saying it can't, just refuting the idea that the lens is inherently flawed

>>4335050
Why are you talking about adapting? Adapting what? Both photos I've posted were shot on a G1 + 45/2 on Provia

>>4335044
>Contax brandwhore is first introduced to Philip Reeve
Oh boy. His entire world is about to come crashing down.

>>4335050
please post a photo

>>4335038
>Film era lens review on a7

Ya, most of my m mount lenses look like ass on an a7 too. They show no issues in my Z mount though. Lens reviews adapting lenses to old a7s are useless

>>4335023

I owned a Contax G2 system from new, switched to it from my Leica M in the late '90s, and had the 28, 45, 90 mm lenses. It didn't work the way I liked ... I used it for a year and a half, trying to do what I did so easily with my M and take advantage of its autofocus. Didn't work and the quality wasn't great either. I sold the whole kit and replaced it with another M, brought me back to normal. The Contax's Zeiss lenses were fine, but they didn't do anything particularly special to my eye that was worth the cost of converting them to M-mount (a one-way trip). I've stayed with Leica ever since. And unlike Contax, Leica have always held their value well, and not just shot up in price due to a social media "fad".

>>4335050
REKT

>>4335056
Phil is a better photographer than you ever will be.

File: Zeiss.jpg (3.78 MB, 1536x2048)

3.78 MB JPG

>>4335017
There's only a set number of core lens designs and I'll let you guess who pioneered them. Modern glass is the same recipe.

I'm one of the ones from earlier criticizing the G system for its flaws that said there's a reason people adapt the Zeiss G lenses to Leica M. The 45mm f/2 is legendary for a reason. Zeiss is a standard for a reason.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:07:09 14:18:43
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4335063
"i could take this picture with my ae-1 program!"

File: 20240709_0007.jpg (1.92 MB, 3861x2589)

1.92 MB JPG

Photos?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:09 12:22:26
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3861
Image Height	2589

>>4335050
if you understood physics yourself you would understand why adapting film era lenses would cause various kinds of image failure

>>4335066
not him but you are coping hard

File: 20240709_0003.jpg (1.6 MB, 3509x2467)

1.6 MB JPG

>>4335065

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:09 12:26:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3509
Image Height	2467

File: 20240709_0008.jpg (1.78 MB, 3791x2327)

1.78 MB JPG

>>4335068

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:09 12:27:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3791
Image Height	2327

File: img20240522_23122932.jpg (4.55 MB, 8490x6933)

4.55 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:24 13:38:05
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4335063
You are on crack bro. Seriously. You think the Chinese give a fuck about Zeiss lens designs? They will reverse engineer and copy anything. The design isn't special because it is OLD. This is 1947 or whenever Zeiss actually stopped making glass and it became a licensed whore. The fact you even compare the brand to Leica is hilarious.

File: 20240709_0006.jpg (1.86 MB, 2606x3718)

1.86 MB JPG

And my favorite, stupid fingers.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:09 12:26:29
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2606
Image Height	3718

File: Zeiss2.jpg (2.08 MB, 1537x2048)

2.08 MB JPG

>>4335064
Probably, desu at the end of the day f/11 is f/11.

I don't get the fighting desu, the G1/G2 are the paperweights with a timer and persistent issues-- not the glass.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:07:09 14:29:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4335064
Yep. Just check the Lomography page on the FD50/1.8 and see what it is capable of. You are used to retards on /p/ posting building corners and out of focus cats. People who actually know how to shoot can use much, much better technology lenses to produce great art.

https://www.lomography.com/lenses/206-canon-fd-50mm-1-8/photos

>>4335075
>lomography
>muh fragile jap shit

File: canonav15018.jpg (500 KB, 1840x1232)

500 KB JPG

>>4335064
Will an AV-1 suffice? ; )

File: Zeiss3.jpg (2.78 MB, 1537x2048)

2.78 MB JPG

>>4335071
You fucking retard didn't understand what I said and just ran with it. Reread what I wrote. Yeah, no shit they'll reverse engineer it, just like the Soviets did but the design is still based on Zeiss. Don't make me start posting M-Rokkor shots cause I will.

This 70 year old lens is beating the shit out of the nophotos you've posted tho :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.4.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:07:09 14:34:36
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 05500005.jpg (4.42 MB, 6298x5078)

4.42 MB JPG

>>4335071
pff

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 7.00.025 2006.04.07
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6298
Image Height	5078

File: IMG_1156.jpg (1013 KB, 1500x995)

1013 KB JPG

>>4335071
You can’t stop getting flexed on by Contax Gs.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	995
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4335077
well fucking mogged lmaoo

>>4335078
>>4335079
>>4335080
lmao the stupid nigger who wasted his welfare check on a g1 is maddd hahaha
these shots are dog shit btw and lomography trannies are wrecking you on a $30 budget lens

>>4335078
yuck!

>>4335082
my shot might be dogshit, can you please provide a photograph?

>>4335077
beautiful shot, not zeiss though

>>4335073
man you really suck ass if you think these are good. it is cool if you have your little cosina toy and it is just a hobby for you but your confidence in saying that this garbage is some kind of amazing design is hilariously lame. you belong on reddit

>>4335084
>beautiful shot, not zeiss though
You're right, it's better.

File: portra400_67_0424-3.jpg (4.31 MB, 8699x7080)

4.31 MB JPG

>>4335085
please provide a photograph

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:23 09:38:42
Image Width	8699
Image Height	7080

>>4334971
lol nice example of a Zeiss. Just a test shot right?

>>4335088
FD 50 f1.8 LOL

File: IMG_5640.jpg (242 KB, 1920x1920)

242 KB JPG

>>4335085
>>4335082

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Illustrator 25.2 (Windows)
Photographer	Duski Saad
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:10:04 06:52:22
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1920
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4335088
Brutal self own. Cosina living rent free.

I don't give a shit about Contax because they look kind of stupid and I like retro cameras, but these Contax geeks are melting down. How fragile are you? Did you really think your old ass lenses were objectively good? Surely not, right?

>>4335089
>>4335092
see the coper grasp