File: A7R01787_F100Retro80s_25.jpg (1.26 MB, 1489x2048)

1.26 MB JPG

>>4380134
>t. waited 900sec to post
But I really hope this thread stays spooky for the next month or so it's doomed to last in this dead place

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

I just bought a Zeiss 50mm f1.4 Planar T* ZE for my canon 1v, but it seems like my 1v cannot control the electronic aperture? It just reads 00 and I can't adjust anything. Is there a custom setting I need to change? I thought it would just work. I don't want to return it, It's a beautiful lens.

File: IMG_20241030_161316488.jpg (383 KB, 1526x1146)

383 KB JPG

>amass 12 rolls of color negs and slides over last 3 months
>send off and get them back from the lab
>realize I'll now need to cut, catalog, scan and postprocess them all
I'm not looking forward to it...

File: IMG_20241031_032646049~2.jpg (122 KB, 1152x479)

122 KB JPG

>>4380172
Those 6x9 slides though hnnnnng

>>4380172
you dont need to scan and edit all of them, its a waste of time. take a contact sheet with your phone. but ideally you learn to tell whats a good photo just from the negative.
>cut, catalog
this is the fun part tho

>>4380174
Yeah "all" is a hyperbole, but I do quick scan everything in low resolution and then pick ones to do in full quality for editing.
This part does feel mostly like a chore though, even when results are rewarding.

>>4380173
>Beautifully composed view of an interesting landscape with great colors
>Boring vacation snapshot tier followup
The duality of man I guess

I don't know who it was but a few months ago anons were discussing B&W development and ideal temperatures and I posted that I was wary of dipping a toe into developing at all because I live somewhere hot and didn't want to have to deal with temperature control. Anon replied "just do it, you'll be fine." so I ordered a development kit.

Three months later I'm developing C41 and B&W 35mm and 120 and every time I pull developed film out of the tank I'm struck by the absolute magic of it, and I would never have taken the leap if not for anon on /p/. Thank you

File: 20241031_0011.jpg (2.92 MB, 6203x6005)

2.92 MB JPG

>>4380137
did anyone said SPOOPY?
>>4380178
great for you anon, its always magic to see those pictures appear on the film. The fun never ends!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:31 16:45:23
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6203
Image Height	6005
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

I bought a bulk loader with some film already set up inside it and shot a small roll of 10 ish photos. Only 2 came out usable and the rest was all fucked up. I also developed a larger empty piece off the bulk and it came out dark. Could it be that the seller had light leaked on to it?

>>4380182
Ok I realised I ruined it myself like a moron remembering now. It's a watson loader and I turned it to open when I pulled some film to stick it to the spool weeks ago. Is the entire thing ruined or is there a a chance film deeper in is ok?

>>4380172
Ive spent the last several weeks on and off developing 30+ rolls of B&W, C-41, and E-6. I have one roll left and I'm definitely not looking forward the scanning and conversions

>>4380178
>every time I pull developed film out of the tank I'm struck by the absolute magic of it

Wait till you do slide film.

File: 10000083619.jpg (4.2 MB, 5943x4620)

4.2 MB JPG

had to downscale this scan of a print i did a few months back, so its a little more grey than normal

olympus om 1, kentmere 400 at 400 iso, blue filter, d76 on ilford rc glossy with a modified MG dev.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.34
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:31 19:51:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5943
Image Height	4620

>>4380191
Im temped to try but it seems like a process more prone to fuckups by me lol

File: monorailing.jpg (1.74 MB, 4000x2252)

1.74 MB JPG

instead of being cool and going out in a costume im inside monorailing taking a pic of a houseplant

toyo view omega 45e

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.34
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:31 20:23:52
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4380195
If you can do C-41, you can do slide film it's basically the same thing.
I did slide film before C-41

>>4380203
join the darkside and start doing black and white. no worry about temperature for the most part, and expired dev is nothing compared to c-41

>my Ricoh GR1 started making weird stuttering noises when I press the shutter

I've only had the camera for a few months :(

File: treeline.jpg (955 KB, 2232x1464)

955 KB JPG

so I got this vivitar 28-210 for my srts. pretty neat. I have no idea how to determine focus below ~80mm or so, it just all sorta seems like its in. I guess that's the nature of wider angles?

File: yellow cat.jpg (980 KB, 2232x1464)

980 KB JPG

>>4380224
it darkens a bit too at max extension, but its relatively clear at least (or so its seemed in these limited hands)

File: black cat.jpg (622 KB, 2232x1464)

622 KB JPG

>>4380225
and then I got a 2x teleconverter to go with it, so now at max extension i'm getting a 420mm equivalent. since the season is getting colder anyway perhaps I will focus less on bugs and more on other things that I can shoot with a longer lens

File: backlit trees.jpg (1.13 MB, 2232x1464)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4380226

>>4380203
>If you can do C-41, you can do slide film it's basically the same thing.
I'm sure I'll fall down the rabbithole eventually lol - it must be fucking ace to see 120 come out in positive

>>4380181
>great for you anon, its always magic to see those pictures appear on the film. The fun never ends!
Cheers anon, I still am almost surprised each time.

File: Velvia_100-1.jpg (4.74 MB, 3872x4932)

4.74 MB JPG

Got some e6 back, shot of the aurora turned out which is the highlight
Velvia 100 at f8, for 2 hours on my 6x7 with a 45mm

>>4380239
Beautiful

File: fuck.jpg (48 KB, 857x1200)

48 KB JPG

I hate negative colour film. It never looks right.

>>4380239
Excellent results for a 2 hour exposure. Could have done without the fence in the shot but nonetheless well done

>>4380248
Yeah, I agree with the fence bit. I didn't realise how strong it was in the composition when i was setting up, I think Id either elevate my camera more or move more to the left to minimise it. Ahwell, just happy my exposure math checked out haha

>>4380246
Your right that does sound very negative

>>4380246
skills issue

>>4380246
yeah you have to invert it, it's a negative after all

>>4380246
yeah but slide film has shit dynamic range, and its pretty annoying to develop at home

where can I get silverfast 4 free
i hate vuescan and I lost silverfast after I sold my plustek

>>4380338
having to buy the software again if I ever decide to buy new scanner is the most jewish thing I've ever heard of

>>4380342
I had to clear my registration off the serial so the new owner could use it
but even if I didn't, it wouldn't work with my coolscan because it's locked to a plustek 8200i

>>4380342
The software, prices, and lack of trustworthy cracks for the software is why no one uses shatbeds.

That, and the fact that a top of the line almost-$1000 v850 with a $200 betterscanning holder and ANR glass set plus a $400 silverfast license just to get 16 bit tiffs is equaled by a D810 with a shoddy macro from 2004 and absolutely fucking curbstomped by a low budget sony FF and the sigma 70mm f2.8 macro - for 35mm and 120. For 4x5 you need to stitch, BUT, you will get your moneys worth out of the film because even if the shatbed scan of a large negative is "ok", the actual resolution per mm is still as low as it is on 35mm.

>>4380358
shatbeds also have less color depth and dynamic range than cameras

you can scan with fucking aps-c and get more information off the negative lmao
>lab scans: my highlights blew, ON FILM?
>shatbed: my highlights blew, ON FILM?
>cameras and darkroom enlargements: oh wait, i have infinite highlight DR lmao

>>4380342
>>4380357
wait what
silverfast licenses are locked to a specific scanner?

>>4380362
to a specific make and model, yes
makes piracy a bitch too

>>4380362
yes. during the time I had the plustek, I also had a v600 for medium, which comes with silverfast, but a less sophisticated version. It would never let me run Ai Studio 9 with the epson. Only SE 8 would work.

>>4380358
>>4380361
get a proper scanner not a shitbed nigger
dslr (((scanning))) is for the unwashed masses

>>4380370
What kind of proper scanner? A drum, or some shitty desktop or lab scanner that turns your glorious film into something that looks like it was shot on micro four thirds?

Camera scanning can exceed the capability of drums, easily. And more reliably. Drums are not just unreliable in use, most of them are janky and out of spec by now.

In fact, the oft-worshiped "HXY scanner" is just a well put together DSLR/MILC scanning setup using a phase one IQ4.
https://www.high-end-scans.de/en/tech/

File: 20241031_0012.jpg (3.2 MB, 6308x6620)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4380358
>>4380361
this, I felt so disappointed the first times that I tried shooting 120 because I only have a shitty flatbed scanner. Now even with a m43 camera and a normal lens I a getting waaaaaay better results.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:31 16:45:50
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6308
Image Height	6620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

I really want to get an old cheap macro to try "DSLR" scanning, it seems so much faster than anything else.
Any recs for a good, old manual focus macro that's easily adapted to modern mounts?
I want to use an Valoi Easy35 unless there are better options.

>>4380391
>be you
>buy shitty macro lens
>come back here
>make another post about how shitty your negatives look and that you're just going to keep using your scanner
Just buy a good macro. It's a one-time investment and it makes sure you won't be adding flaws to your negatives

>>4380391
Minolta af 100mm f2.8 macro/minolta af 50mm f2.8 macro

manual aperture control adapters for A mount do in fact exist but they work natively on sony cameras with the appropriate LA-EA# adapter.

>>4380246
tiffs or gtfo

>>4379350
Wait, did I understand this right
There's basically the equivalent of Rownald Mowrey (PE on Photrio) in Ukraine, aliveand well?

File: Untitled.jpg (4.34 MB, 3513x2843)

4.34 MB JPG

Life is pain. Terrible stain fogging on this one, and the other shot had a bad light leak from somewhere. This one can possibly be saved with a stain removal concotion. I'll probably experiment with it.

I like and dislike this picture. It looks decent printed aside from the hexagons that show up, but my technique definitely could have been better. More learning ahead!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:31 14:05:20
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4380193
Nice and based print poster! Not sure if the scan blocked up the highlights, but usually you want at least at least a tiny bit of tone around the entire perimeter of your print. If not your composition sort of gets lost in the borders.

>>4380199
When are we going to see the shot?

File: 000016720005.jpg (4.82 MB, 3130x2075)

4.82 MB JPG

First time shooting ultramax. I like it more than I thought I would.

File: 000016720032.jpg (4.59 MB, 2052x3089)

4.59 MB JPG

>>4380481

File: 000016710020-2 (1).jpg (4.21 MB, 2003x2853)

4.21 MB JPG

>>4380482

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 10.0.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:22 15:01:38
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4380478
funny that i got (you)'d twice

honestly, this was the best print i could get. just checked back on the print itself and it looks way darker than the jpg i posted. i usually never touch up my scans but i probably should if downscaling does that much of a difference.

and ill probably develop the negative in a few days. still have one more shot of a landscape but the clouds out here aren't great the past few days.

tried to swing to get only one leaf in focus and i think i did that, although the lighting on my groundglass was super dark since i only go up to f/6.3. did it f/8 at 25 seconds accounting for some failure and also so a shallower depth of field along with the swing should get a great shot of just the leaf.

>>4380251
>:(
>>4380255
>:(
>>4380267
>:(
>>4380281
E100 is beautiful tho when you hit the exposure just right.
>>4380417
>:(

>>4380657
Smile. It's a new day and another opportunity to take some cool pics. :)

File: Screenshot 2024-11-02 at (...).png (1.03 MB, 768x497)

1.03 MB PNG

what's this shite?
it's visible on the neg and not just the scan
god CURSE safelight berlin I will send them ecn-2 film in c41 canisters

File: 000055.jpg (4.33 MB, 5397x3602)

4.33 MB JPG

Hiya everyone, I'm relatively new to film photog (and photog in general) but i got a couple cameras from my parents I've been using and have processed a few rolls.
One of the cameras is a Minolta SRT101, but there's something funny going on with the rewind knob. Figured I'd try ask here to see if it's common at all, simple fix, or not.
Loading film all seems fine but the rewind knob will never start moving on it until the shot counter hits 5. The film is advancing inside but the knob doesn't move until the shots hit that magic number. Rewinding is also a precarious task, it feels like smooth surface mechanical slippage.
Have a shot as thanks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP500
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-2.0-0E-350
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:25 19:38:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5397
Image Height	3602

>>4380663
scratch on the neg, noob

man the photos in here are fucking awful. what a waste of film

>>4380671
doubt it, unless they've scratched it. all my B&W through that camera came out fine, those 2 C41 rolls got stains like those all over them

>>4380671
Can you post a good one to improve thread quality?

>>4380663
>I will send them ecn-2 film in c41 canisters
looks like someone already did

>>4380663
I use Aperture Film Lab Berlin and so far they've been pretty good, have you tried them?

>>4380665
when you finish loading the film in the camera, wind the knob backwards until its tight.

>>4380665
It's just the slack in the film canister.

>>4380418
Pretty much, yes. Well, technically, he should know a bit more since Mowrey worked on consumer colour film and our Ukrainian PE was in charge of the entire Svema's colour branch, including professional and experimental stuff like LN-9 with remjet. Interestingly, T-grain was reserved for military and DS 100

File: 000037_censored.jpg (4.43 MB, 5397x3602)

4.43 MB JPG

>>4380718
>>4380720
Ah yeah I realised what's going on.
Unless I use the force of a thousand suns I can't close the lid as the latch doesn't have a lot of angle at the intersection points and is super stuff so i was needing to lift it up to pull the latch up but that released the spring in the canister from the taught state.

Shot is on 20y expired fujifilm 400.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>went to an event today as a volunteer
>brought my camera because why not
>partway through event coordinator decrees I'm now the event photographer and want me to send them all the pictures I took
>going back tomorrow and I've already locked myself in to bringing my camera again since I did day one and didn't say no
fuck I hope the shots turn out and I shot enough of all the folks and I didn't only shoot the cute girls and they like my angles and focusing decisions and I've never even gotten a roll of this film developed and now I'm gonna probably burn through another two tomorrow on top of the two today and I don't have social media so I'll have to get a ton of phone numbers or emails fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

>>4380830
This is your in. Don't fuck it up.

>>4380830
Taking your hobby into an employee job is always the best or very worst decision you can do, work-wise.
Hope you don't get scarred.

>>4380830
>volunteer
>send me the photos you took
>rolls of film
Don't give anyone your photos for free idiot. They are taking advantage of you.

>>4380714
no
to be fair I seldomly shoot C41. I mostly shoot vision3, and those rolls I send to wolczak filmlabor in vienna. he charges 6 eur for ECN dev. B&W I do myself.
I picked safecrap because their large scan was decently priced

>haven't taken a single photo in 4 months due to stress and lack of time
>Have a small 4 day vacation planned with my family next week
>No desire to take a camera and take pics
>Know I'll regret it in the future if I don't

Should I take my simple point and shoot 35mm camera or my hasselblad? I enjoy the hasselblad more when I'm in the mood to take pics, given my current malaise I wonder if I'll see it as too much work and not take any pics with it.

>>4380910
whenever I've felt like that, having to meter and try to guess EV values only made it a bit more annoying. go for your P&S, anon.

>>4380910
Bring the one you like using the most.
The right camera is not always the one most suited for the job.

File: thumbsup.jpg (7 KB, 225x225)

7 KB JPG

>>4380910
Any photo better than nophoto

>>4380910
PnS all the way if it is easier to use, chimping the settings sometimes takes the little mood you have

File: IMGP3702-1.jpg (2.83 MB, 5262x3462)

2.83 MB JPG

an tree or two

>>4380840
It's a local event that is 100% volunteer organized and run so it's not like anyone else is getting paid either. I'm much more concerned that the pictures will just be bad or boring than about making $$ anyway, I hardly photograph people so I was using this as an exercise but it got REAL.

>>4380910
I got a little Canon p&s with zoom to shoot 800ISO color with. Very small and does everything I want. I no longer feel compelled to bring my 35mm or 120 SLRs on trips, saving them just for work.

Have any of you tried developing with bleach bypass?

does unmixed fixer go bad? i've forgot kek

>>4381134
sealed powder? Nah. Liquid? Yes

>>4381148
i've got an opened bottle of tetenal superfix from 2021
i'll just do a fixer test on a piece of leader and see

File: 4 shots.jpg (3.49 MB, 1440x2160)

3.49 MB JPG

Went on a trip to Japan and picked up an Olympus Peenis half frame camera. Have never shot film before, what do you think?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi

File: 3 more.jpg (3.51 MB, 1440x2068)

3.51 MB JPG

>>4381223

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.21
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi

>>4381223
Pretty comfy... far better than most.

>>4381223
>>4381224
>Shots :|
>Shots in Japan :O

>>4381234
this but halfframe is actually more relevant now than ever because of dipstitch since single stills cant impress anyone anymore

File: 53245985.jpg (4.04 MB, 2048x2905)

4.04 MB JPG

>>4381223
Luv me peen-ee snapshits. Simple as.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2905
Image Height	2048

>>4381284
[building corner intensifies]

>>4381288
Half frame half building corner. I'm thinking based.

File: 55086384.jpg (1016 KB, 1037x1565)

1016 KB JPG

>>4381288
>>4381290
Have a building corner dick pic complete with black and white rainbow taken on a camera as old as my parents for extra cringe points

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.10.011 (130930)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1565
Image Height	1037

>>4380239
nice one anon

>>4380239
how did you determine the 2 hr exposure time? did you take into account reciprocity?

File: May Aurora Velvia 100.jpg (76 KB, 633x787)

76 KB JPG

>>4381321
So this is my third time doing astro on slide, and I doubled my exposure from a dslr to work out the light needed. Then I used a 1 stop darker exposure for the aurora in May, it turned out, so for this I added another half stop, and doubled the time, since I figured it wouldn't be that bright compared to may.

Reciprocity is weird for astro work on slide I've found, since the stars are moving the emulsion isn't being constantly exposed, the stars move etc. So the exposure math is basically f5.6-f8 for the stars, at ISO 100, and the stars will show up, and any tweaking or adjustment is just for foreground compensation

>>4381329
For reference, this was Velvia 50 at 5.6 for 1 hour, aiming for a similar exposure to my DSLR that was at f4 at ISO 100 for 30mins. Which if you convert the stops over I doubled the exposure time to account for recipro. I found an article I think by this dude who shot only velvia for like 2 decades and his guide was roughly double but stopped at 5mins, so I just ran with it.
Like I said, stars move so are constantly affecting new parts of the emulsion, and the recipro probably helps with keeping the foreground and other non-star stuff from overexposing.

File: ss+(2024-11-04+at+07.49.37).jpg (189 KB, 1278x986)

189 KB JPG

>>4381345
fuck forgot pic, my bad

>usual stores are out of 3.8L D76 packets
>one store has "one per customer" until supply chain is fixed or some shit
>only other one available is 50% more expensive
grim. and no i will not be switching to ilford or some liquid shit
>just make your own from scratch
in a few years i will be when i go way more into the deep end than i already have

>>4381398
why don't you order that german adox d76? it's the same thing but cheaper

File: 000033070009.jpg (842 KB, 1565x1037)

842 KB JPG

>>4380134
is this error on cineshill, the lab, or me? 400D btw, wouldn't shoot again

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.20.004 (200730)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1565
Image Height	1037

File: 000033070015.jpg (519 KB, 1565x1037)

519 KB JPG

>>4381508
another example, its occurred mid roll only and for 10 shots the end of the roll was fine

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.20.004 (200730)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1565
Image Height	1037

>>4381508
do you have the negatives yet?
judging by this, it looks like a lab issue. especially if it's mid roll only.

>>4381512
the negatives are in the mail, but ill post them when i get them

>>4381508
>>4381509
looks like part of another negative got laid over the frame, those look like sprocket holes

>>4381519
yes a few of the other images have a clearly outlined sprocket on them, so is this the lab then? and if so what should I do?

>>4381521
call them and say wtf is up with your photos

Would a hasselblad h4D with 39MP back and macro lens be a good film scanning camera?

>>4381562
Not really but at least it isn't a sony.

>>4381565
Why not? Cause ccd? Or is it too bulky?

Just got my Oly OM-2N in the mail, pretty excited to use it after my SP shit the bed. Really small, pretty camera : )

>>4381581
Ummmm, sir. You're supposed to bite your tongue until you actually have pictures to share then you can talk about your cool new camera.

File: carts.jpg (559 KB, 2232x1464)

559 KB JPG

>>4381581
I hope you shoot some nice stuff with it anon. my mom sent me her old om-2n a few months ago and i've been enjoying it a ton.

>>4381585
i'll post a few of mine in anon's stead

File: sky1.jpg (664 KB, 2232x1464)

664 KB JPG

>>4381586

File: JMHS.jpg (1 MB, 1464x2232)

1 MB JPG

>>4381587

File: sunset on sunset.jpg (512 KB, 2232x1464)

512 KB JPG

>>4381588

File: LA traffic.jpg (1.12 MB, 2232x1464)

1.12 MB JPG

>>4381589

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2232
Image Height	1464
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

>>4381405
interesting, didnt know that was a thing. but i can only get the 1L version here (Australia). i can also get the regular kodak 1L version but using 1L ones is way more expensive than 3.8L and will take me so much longer to mix up etc

>>4381590
lmao based LA paparazzi

>>4380361
>shatbeds also have less color depth and dynamic range than cameras[citation needed]

I do not understand 800T, it seems wildly inconsistent compared with what my camera meter tells me

>>4381704
spot meter

>>4381704
Because it's iso 500 repacked as iso 800. Attempting to shoot it at iso 800 in dim light ends in almost blank image.

>>4381711
that's not how it works but ok

>>4381717
That's exactly how it works.

File: home-ish.jpg (813 KB, 2232x1464)

813 KB JPG

>>4381711
quite the opposite, based on how its performed nightwalking i expected it to be a bit darker especially since I underexposed many shots by a full stop

>>4381719
Then congrats for living in some seriously light polluted areas if you can get decent amount of information on film when shooting handheld at night at iso 1600. My attempts at shooting it handheld at 800 at concert venue with a reasonable for iso 800 setting resulted in mostly transparent roll of film. I was prepared for dark images but not THAT dark.

>>4381720
Same venue and iso 400 color film of other stock resulted in decent for lighting conditions amount of images.

>>4381720
hmmmmm I do wonder why there are different ISO rantings for different lighting conditions for the same film
very curious
makes your noggin joggin

>>4381723
Well, different light sources have own characteristics and many film stocks do not have linear response curve.

>>4381581
>my SP shit the bed
what happened? i was thinking about getting one myself

>>4381720
i get normally dense images shooting with 800 film at f1.2 and 1/30 ish

>>4381776
>f1.2
Explains a lot. I would not consider 1/30 to be handheld shutter speed tho. You can if you don't mind blurring stuff.

>>4381779
1/30 is fine, especially if you dont use a pisslr

>>4381798
1/30 is fine, especially if you dont have arthritis

File: _DSC4374.jpg (2.86 MB, 5905x3942)

2.86 MB JPG

I love ektar but it's such a bitch to scan

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:05 20:44:03
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 578917886_21ec88ba-409b-4(...).jpg (412 KB, 2048x1536)

412 KB JPG

what are kellogg's tones like?

>>4381733
The leaf shutter is jammed up with some ancient oil, and the aperture/shutter speed rings are a bit hard to move (probably also the oil). I shot 2 rolls through it before I noticed the shutter wasn't making the right sound, you have to 'shoot' it like 20 or so times until the leaf shutter breaks free and if you let it sit awhile it'd get stuck again. The meter is also fucked. The camera as a whole seems really solidly built, just maintenance issues. Still insanely pissed about it since I paid a premium for it from Kamerastore, assuming that there restored tag meant they'd send me a camera that functioned. Last time I'm buying anything from fins.

File: wherebanana.jpg (46 KB, 876x475)

46 KB JPG

What is /fgt/'s opnion on instant film? I really cannot be fucked dealing with 35mm development, but would like a instant film camera just for funsies.
>Cost per shot is a consideration but not a dealbreaker.
A roll of 35mm Kodak Gold here is about $25 for 36 exposures and is basically the cheapest 35mm film available, for reference.
>pleasing results > gear asthetic > being a cheap cunt about film
To reiterate, no I cannot be fucked using an SLR.

I have a very good digital camera for the majority of my photog, I just want something for travel snapshits more or less.

>>4382038
They're fun and I have no qualms with the medium. If I was extremely wealthy I would shoot expired 8x10 Polaroid for shits and giggles.

>>4382038
>A roll of 35mm Kodak Gold here is about $25
what the fug, where do you like. Antartica? That is a 3 pack of gold over here lmao

Instant film can be fun, and its not that expensive if you shoot instax mini for example, since you are looking for pleasing results it would be probably good enough for you, because while the film is fine most of the instax cameras are auto everything plastic shit.

Or just get a hal frame camera dunno

File: oztralia.png (18 KB, 349x321)

18 KB PNG

>>4382045
>Polaroids
Intrigue me. But look look the be the most expensive instant film here.
>>4382047
>Where do you live?
Australia. $25 AUD, I should say, so I'm guessing something like $15 USD. Still kind of fucked though.
>Instax Mini
Bought my GF one years ago and it's not super expensive, but the:
>auto everything plastic shit
is what puts me off using it myself. Instax have other options I'm aware of that I might look into
>just get a half frame camera
Was considering it for a bit there, they're dirt cheap, but I just plainly don't want to deal with dev

I have also seen Kodak do some instant cameras, but I don't hear anything about them so I assume they're shit.

>>4382058
>>4382047
Auto everything plastic shit is fine for instax IMO. The film does not have much resolution and putting a better lens on will not let you enlarge it any more than with the plastic lens. If you want to do a telephoto lens or something more unusual I could see it.

I have no idea how they get the exposure so close with fixed shutter speed, no meter and only like 4 aperture settings. It's basically slide film so you would expect it to be real finnicky but I rarely get a full black or white image. I guess the flash helps if you use it.

>>4382065
The film has plenty of resolution when not behind a shit lens. I have an Instax 200 and "infinity" is actually 20-30 feet, and the close is 3 or so feet.

When taken at exactly those distances, the photos can be sharp. All other distances - blurry shit.

I just want a decent camera for it that isn't 800 currencies, but I'll probably relent and get the mint rangefinder eventually.

>>4382081
>The film has plenty of resolution when not behind a shit lens
No. It is fine for looking in person but if you scan and enlarge it you'll see there is no more detail than you can see with the naked eye. I modified an instax mini to take very sharp mamiya press lens and there is basically no difference in resolution or sharpness vs the stock lens. Only really good for bokehwhoring.
>When taken at exactly those distances, the photos can be sharp. All other distances - blurry shit.
Honestly skill issue, just position your subjects at the sharp distances.
It would be cool if fuji made 4x5 or larger instax for taking serious pictures. The colors are really great. But since they only make itty bitty film I just use it for what it is, a fun toy and not something worth optimizing quality.

File: 1acia_polaroid2.jpg (919 KB, 1390x1639)

919 KB JPG

>>4382099
Bullshit. Instax film is fine, it just has a lot less stops of dynamic range. Use a light meter and a grey card, light everything evenly around the middle grey. Here is a shot using an adapted RZ67 Pro ii and the legendary Sekor 110mm lens. Turned out so nice and painterly. Even the Instax minis are capable of producing great images for a toy if you know how to control light, I will post some examples next that I had in the last recent photo thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 25.11 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1365
Image Height	1609
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	480 dpi
Vertical Resolution	480 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:02 16:38:40
Image Width	1365
Image Height	1609
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1390
Image Height	1639

File: polaroids (5)_web - Copy.jpg (724 KB, 911x1417)

724 KB JPG

Instax mini camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4376
Image Height	6814
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:17 19:31:02
Image Width	4376
Image Height	6814
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	911
Image Height	1417

File: polaroids_web_ - Copy.jpg (871 KB, 913x1417)

871 KB JPG

Another Instax Mini. Looks fine considering it has a cheap plastic lens.
>>4382099
You just need a proper adapter from somewhere like Brooklyn film co to scan properly and get decent documentation. Then in photoshop to adjust the contrast, sharpness and and color shifts to mirror the original. Never looks as good as the physical print by still is workable.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4390
Image Height	6814
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:22 16:57:55
Image Width	4390
Image Height	6814
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	913
Image Height	1417

>>4382108
the camera is the only mini thing about this shoot

>>4382109
Anon your 0.75 megapixel scans are not exactly selling this as a serious film
Keep in mind the film area on instax mini is bigger than 645. Now compare its sharpness with a 645 scan.

>>4380239
kino

>>4382107
>>4382108
>>4382109
absolutely fucking disgusting

File: gibmilk.jpg (72 KB, 800x786)

72 KB JPG

>>4382107
>>4382108
>>4382109
oh my god, I'm so hungry

>>4382107
>>4382108
>>4382109
Moar sir

File: Ilford Pan F 50 Plus-7.jpg (146 KB, 1500x1875)

146 KB JPG

Random question, going to be doing a semester abroad in North Carolina, in Boone, are there any labs worth using nearby or is it all just mailing stuff? And if the latter, what labs do you guys recommend?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:07:13 01:03:44
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4382438
Im in North Carolina, Boone is great, my sister goes to school there. Not sure of any local labs in the Boone area but there are a few in Raleigh but thats like 3 hours away. Honestly I just mail my film to Gelatin Labs up in NJ most of the time. Youre in for some great photo opportunities, the appalachain mountains are beautiful.

File: _DSC4398.jpg (3.27 MB, 5925x3955)

3.27 MB JPG

Finally I have a good lightmeter and did some night photos
these came out crazy, there was a fog and strong lights from near stadium and I found this funny pink lantern

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:07 19:39:16
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4382558
35mm shot in a dim low contrast mess is this crisp at almost 24mp?

File: PB040243~2.jpg (2.47 MB, 4516x2888)

2.47 MB JPG

I'm pretty sure this was Ektar shot with Canon EOS 600 and Sigma 400mm f/5.6

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M5MarkII
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 24.0 (Windows)
Photographer	mauno
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Color Filter Array Pattern	960
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4516
Image Height	2888
Image Created	2024:11:06 19:10:06
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Program	Manual
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
Sharpness	Normal
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Saturation	Normal
Light Source	Unknown
Contrast	Normal
Metering Mode	Pattern
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2888
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	4516
Exposure Mode	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal

>>4382570
Did you miss exposure and go +6 exposure or are the huge distracting grid lines from scanning on a computer screen for a light source?

File: PB040280.jpg (1.7 MB, 2888x4397)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4382572
I think it has something to do with post-processing the scans on PSE. On a Plustek scanner it doesn't show the lines, the film exposure was off by a third of a stop. I've used the light source with other rolls of film without the lines.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M5MarkII
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 24.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Color Filter Array Pattern	1402
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:04 20:39:49
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2888
Image Height	4397
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: _DSC4404.jpg (3.61 MB, 5885x3929)

3.61 MB JPG

been in Norway recently on a work-trip and shot some night pics
I was pretty inexperienced with low light exposures, but I can recommend you all Gossen Lunasix. This thing is from the late 60's and it's so damn precise, ALL of my night photos are nicely exposed.
Moonrise at midnight, 5min (should have probably shot that for longer for nicer start-rails, but it was literally last frame in the roll and I was dead tired)

>>4382563
Portra 400, 34s at f5.6
it is pretty crisp, but there was quite a lot of ambient light from the stadium
without that, it would be dark as fuck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:07 20:55:29
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4382599
>Gossen Lunasix
great meter. none of that crappy nip shit. gossen stuff is the real deal.

File: 3366-6.jpg (2.73 MB, 4098x6001)

2.73 MB JPG

I usually never edit scans, but Midwest Film sends them back extremely flat so I guess I'm gonna have to learn.


Also what the fuck is up with this email verification

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:07 16:37:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4098
Image Height	6001

File: 3366-34.jpg (3.1 MB, 4099x6006)

3.1 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:07 16:44:33
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4099
Image Height	6006

File: 3366-11.jpg (3.98 MB, 4098x5999)

3.98 MB JPG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVLY-TV_mast

You can see this thing from miles away. The guy wires are thicker than my arm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:07 16:46:19
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4098
Image Height	5999

File: 54090556092_0c01070f39_o.jpg (1.75 MB, 1930x2896)

1.75 MB JPG

>>4380134

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1930
Image Height	2896
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4382631
looks like a shit scan or shit dev (maybe both) not just "flat"
did they give you raws at least? maybe it can be salvaged

>>4382651
The thumbnail looks like a giant kitten's head emerging from the ocean. Kino.

>>4382652
oh that's my edit lol. They give massive tiffs that they scan on a Cintel, so it can be easily edited. And to be fair the film was also expired ECN-2 film as well.

which would be a better mount to get in to for lens selection, nikon or canon?

>>4382677
which ever one you have with you

File: 20241107_0011_01.jpg (2.65 MB, 2277x2624)

2.65 MB JPG

I am really liking Lucky film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G6
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:07 16:00:38
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2277
Image Height	2624
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Unknown
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Off
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Aperture Priority
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

>>4382677
fuck canon, nikon is the way to go

File: fujinon 180mm f5.6.png (370 KB, 534x651)

370 KB PNG

hello large format /fgt/s

my professor just gifted me a fujinon w 180mm 5.6 lens! groundglass is so much brighter than my caltar ii-e 150mm 6.3 i also have for my toyo omega view 45e.

now i need to buy more filters that are sized 58mm haha

looking for a flash that I can tilt for my konica hexar. the metz 30 bct 4 that i've got on my nikon is too big. it covers the lens kek

File: FH000008.jpg (1.57 MB, 1523x1523)

1.57 MB JPG

My camera is very old.
Ilford HP5 (120 film)

File: FH000003.jpg (951 KB, 1523x1523)

951 KB JPG

>>4382809

File: 3366-6jpg.jpg (3.37 MB, 4098x6001)

3.37 MB JPG

>>4382631
>>4382652
>>4382659

Here is the raw file they gave me, clocking in just under 80mb if anyone wants to fuck around: https://files.catbox.moe/whszkr.tif

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.5.2 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:01 10:08:41
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4098
Image Height	6001
Scene Capture Type	Standard

A 2x teleconverter combined with bellows macro... Thoughts? 2x at the bellows attachment and this 2x macro? Or 2x on the lens attachment before the lens? Or just a dumb idea

File: Screenshot 2024-11-08 at (...).png (529 KB, 440x643)

529 KB PNG

>>4382832
the scene looks kind of tricky, how did it look when you took the photo? looks like some light fog at dusk
what film was this

>>4382841
It was mid morning somewhere in the North Midwest, either the UP or Wisconsin in the summer. It was drizzling for a bit a little later IIRC. This was in 2021 during a large road trip and I should hav taken notes.

Film is expired but decently stored Eterna 250D from QWD

File: whszkr.jpg (3.28 MB, 3714x5439)

3.28 MB JPG

>>4382832
I tried
It looks like it was a very contrasty scene, the sky is overexposed and the ground seems bit underexposed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:08 18:14:58
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: balls.jpg (2.82 MB, 1916x2814)

2.82 MB JPG

>>4382832
my sorry attempt at editing this
I tried to go for a moody look, seemed appropriate

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>4382851
okay I might have went a bit too far on the color balance, it's very blue

>>4382835
Pretty retarded because the teleconverter basically cancels out the bellows, and you're going to have long exposure times with the combo.

Longer focal distances need longer bellows to achieve the same magnification and if you're doing 35mm or 120 your bellows length is going to be be fairly limited already.

File: _DSC4442.jpg (3.11 MB, 3837x5748)

3.11 MB JPG

some more autumn ektar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:08 20:15:40
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4382727
Never tried a fuji lens. You'll have to post some pics. I know there are a handful of highly desirable lenses made by them. I think one of their 360mm lenses is considered legendary.

>>4380187
If you expose undeveloped film to light, it will get fogged. If you can dev it by yourself for little to no cost, try shooting it anyway to see how bad it is. Do not use potentially ruined film for anything important.

>>4383149
I developped a big chunk at school with my teacher and we got to usable film. ill use it to experiment around

File: F8E6387F-9CD5-43CF-82C7-F(...).jpg (974 KB, 1127x750)

974 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	1127
Image Height	750

File: 1421857C-108A-40BF-A987-9(...).jpg (922 KB, 750x1117)

922 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	750
Image Height	1117

File: 7A2A2738-296C-4603-80D1-2(...).jpg (826 KB, 750x1138)

826 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	750
Image Height	1138

File: F4B8CC8E-1E86-4F9A-BA4F-B(...).jpg (941 KB, 750x1132)

941 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	750
Image Height	1132

basically random shitty phone pics but taken on film, great

>>4383252
Nice photo you contributed there.

>>4383254
I did contribute before.

File: _DSC4453.jpg (3.53 MB, 5710x3812)

3.53 MB JPG

more Norway on vision3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:09 18:39:08
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 28A_1142.jpg (2.02 MB, 2996x2000)

2.02 MB JPG

Got my most recent rolls developed. Fuji 400 on a PZ10. Nothing too fancy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:02 17:18:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: 18A_1132.jpg (2.22 MB, 2996x2000)

2.22 MB JPG

>>4383298
Not the best shot I've taken, the fucker kept moving around and fighting crows

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:02 17:17:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: 33A_1186.jpg (2.39 MB, 2996x2000)

2.39 MB JPG

>>4383298
>>4383299
Last one of any particular interest. Beyond this are basically just stuff that could be off my phone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:02 17:21:44
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: Untitled6.jpg (3 MB, 2491x3222)

3 MB JPG

>>4383298
LOVE muscovy ducks. Very based image. I'll give it a 9.5/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.1.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6229
Image Height	9439
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:01:25 16:19:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

File: 30A_1183.jpg (1.97 MB, 2996x2000)

1.97 MB JPG

>>4383304
I've always been partial to mallards, but part of that is due to me moving from New York to Florida recently. I'll warm up to them eventually. They've got some gorgeous coloring though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:02 17:21:31
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: _DSC4474.jpg (3.53 MB, 3000x4494)

3.53 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D610
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	1384
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:09 23:34:28
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown