How do you organize your photos? Are there free alternatives to adobe?
>>4389640I use arch btw not sure if that matters
>>4376488
>>4389645Thanks
Year folder > Month folder > Day of photo folder: RAWsGrouped by type (urban, macro, astro, etc.): OOC picks and post editsI don't see why the classic self-organised path is so neglected.>>4389642It doesn't but thank you for your service
>>4389640I just put the film into a separate container in the fridge when I'm done shooting a roll. Might dev them one day, idk.
>>4389650How do i find that picture of pepe laughing with tears in his eyes? I have hundreds of frog pictures.
>>4389640One folder for edited photos, arranged by date taken.
>>4389642>coreboot>arch>LUKS btrfs raid 10>folders sorted as "scanning device name: scan number - film name and ISO (if pushed/pulled): folder with untouched lossless 16bit JXL files>edit in darktable-git as needed then exported in lossless 8bit JXL into the "scan number - film name and ISO (if pushed/pulled)" folder>negatives are kept in a sleeve in a nice binder>photos I like get printed and the very best go on the wall in my office, the rest to a photo album>slice of life photos get dumped on my instagram for my normie friends to likesimple as
>>4389703>sorting by scanner and film typeit's almost like your masturbatory process is more important than the date and content of the images
>>4389711>datesometimes it takes me two weeks to finish a roll of 135 and since I'm not shooting with an MZ-S or something I don't know the date anyways so why bother with time stamps>INB4 I journal every single one of my exposures so I know precisely when and where was each frame taken, camera settings toofaggot>contentnigga it's right there on the screenliterally two clicks awayjust look at the file previewsor does your uncultured monkey brain require a "men, walking on the street, captured from behind at 12-52 on last Thursday.jpg" under every file??I mean do you even print your work lmao?
>>4389713hit a nerve there didn't i
>>4389714I'm just bored honestly.
>>4389650I just drop my raws into a new sequential folder for each transfer, and I add the main theme of the pictures at the end of the folder name. They are already organized in a chronological manner that way, and I can also quickly remember what kind of event/photos were involved by just reading the folder name. This prevents the overabundance of directories. For more precise searches the photos have metadata anyway.
>>4389713why even bother sorting into film/iso when you can just read that off the edges? you are scanning the full frame including the edges, right?
>>4389640I use a folder, with some subfolders
>>4389727>he only shoots film with distinct labelling and never pushes or pulls
>>4389738>he isn't scanning the full frame of film
