>I am tired of these people... their comment-questions

Does Musk have sharpshooters looking over him somewhere? He was probably contemplating whether or not to say the safe word

>>16249756
ITAR contract hitmen in the shadows

File: 1706340019592647.jpg (180 KB, 1647x1095)

180 KB JPG

>Over 100 rescue team members and 30 vehicles from Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center heading to Inner Mongolia to welcome Chang'e-6 back home

https://x.com/CNSAWatcher/status/1804928915015700833

File: hls.jpg (359 KB, 1920x1080)

359 KB JPG

>For landing on the Moon you need pretty big landing legs, in case one leg lands on a boulder and another lands in a crater, you don't want to tip over.

File: 1713480853335884.jpg (1.95 MB, 3663x5494)

1.95 MB JPG

>Our favourite picture taken during the #Ariane6 'wet dress-rehearsal' – showing Europe's new rocket standing tall on the launch pad for the first time.

https://x.com/ESA_transport/status/1804766396779290870

What's the current status of the launch site that SpaceX started leasing some time ago?

>>16249764
well stage again, just don't reuse the shit thread

>>16249740
Edition of what?

>>16249740
his questions were good fuck of criticizer

>>16249764
Calm down, retard

Estronaut during his tour acts like he doesn't undestand much about rockets and just says random stuff to keep the conversation going.

>>16249740
>no /sfg/ in subject line

File: 011231.jpg (138 KB, 1916x1083)

138 KB JPG

>>16249727
>the payload for all the flights this year is data
>just to learn things
>its design refinement, to see what works, what doesn't work
>some things sometimes work, which can throw you off
>it worked once but doesn't work again because the combination of factors isn't the same
>the first things you find are fundamental errors in design, where success was not one of the possible outcomes
>then in some cases its like russian roulette, success is sometimes possible, but once in a while you blow yourself up
>that is going to require a lot of flights to find the 1-in-10 failure or the 1-in-100 failure, there are going to be a bunch of things like that
>Tim: [Commenting on Starship hops]
>learning how to work with stainless steel as the primary structural element, working with liquid methane and full flow staged combustion engine as the engine
>you need very powerful actuators for the flaps
>the engine to vehicle interactions are very complicated
>you don't really see those on a test stand, different vehicle to engine interactions when you are in flight
>there is no test stand that can test a rocket at 17,000 mph doing 6gs in every different orientation
>you do as much as you can on the ground, then you got to fly it, do some things in simulation but a lot of things are not going to be included in the simulation
>Tim: Its crazy [about the 100th time he has said this]

did boeing make this thread?

>>16249784
mass optimization, please understand

>>16249787
be silent or you will commit suicide

File: 1640932449190.png (382 KB, 979x443)

382 KB PNG

>>16249784
>negative mass allocation

>>16249794
>overweight vehicles
Rude :(

>shit jokes to cover posting incompetence
wew

they're making fun of us in the /sfg/ discord again

>>16249775
Yeah I got that too. It was just chitchat, no substantial questions. Elon did have interesting things to say but you could hardly have had a less stimulating interviewer.

>>16249768
that thread is good

>>16249805
reusing threads is bad, it encourages early staging

>>16249807
that wasn't even an early stage, two people posted threads simultaneously

File: 13f24a350f951286.jpg (37 KB, 666x607)

37 KB JPG

>>16249808

So do I delete this thread or what? I'm fine with that

>>16249819
I thought that wasn't possible?

>>16249819
YES

>>16249822
It wasn't at some point, there might be a time limit

>>16249819
Yeah just make another one with the correct formatting lol

File: 1718951267946729.png (374 KB, 680x680)

374 KB PNG

>>16249816
stupid frogposter
>>16249819
if you can

File: 011232.jpg (20 KB, 426x224)

20 KB JPG

>>16249831
but then the continuity is lost, the previous thread got archived already

>>16249833
that other thread has a link in the old thread
continuity is overrated anyway

>>16249835
Okay, I don't think it makes sense to delete this one anyway

Stage to other thread

>>16244898
>>16244898
>>16244898
>>16244898

>>16249833
continuity was broken pretty much daily back when collagefag used to split threads
Not a big deal. Plus I think everyone just searches for “/sfg/” via the catalog anyways so that’s the more important thing to prioritize

how to get a /sci/ girlfriend?

>>16249883
"hi i want to show you my big rocket"

>>16249883
Get? No, you make your own.

>>16249883
In the library.

File: 1615654241630.png (114 KB, 1209x568)

114 KB PNG

>>16249883

fags

>>16249903
How?