Sadly, Duolicious is the world's most-used free and open-source dating app>Duolicious web apphttps://web.duolicious.app>Duolicious Githubhttps://github.com/duolicious>Server statushttps://thereisnosanity.com/duo/Previous thread: >>33579384
>>33683969Is there some way to disincentivize ghosting/ one word answers? Like factor it in with the %reply stats for an overall conversation partner score?
God bless OP for continuing to run this shit for you thankless degenerates
Just make it 10 intros. People shouldn't be wasting too much time on this shit anyways.
>New thread >Still 0 intros received >Still 0 interaction with girls>Still no duolicious gfGood morning and 'happy' New Year
>The female to male ratio is getting better, I swear! Pals, this shit is insane, literally.
>>33684620literally 100% your fault if you're sending intros to people with those ratios
>>33684601Same man, the girls on there have both the highest and the lowest standards I have ever seen personally. At least I got a cute salon girl who seems interested in me giving me a haircut tomorrow.
>>33684601i may be close to being a thing with this girl. from what i experience dating is very sudden.
>Finally a cute non normie girl that's around my age appears in this forsaken hellscape that is Italy>"I'll try contacting her later because holiday family shenanigans wouldn't let me reply quick enough and I hate leaving people hanging">Two days pass>"Ok now I can">She disappearedGoddammit
>>33684803It was my fault. I've been talking to an Italian girl for about a month now. I'm normally racist against all continental Europeans but she is cute and super sweet so it's fine.I haven't told her I hate pasta yet though.
>>33683861nice contest collapse dummy
>>33685352context collapsei forgot how bad swipe to text is uwu
>>33684601Been 5 months with no intros, as a man you always have to take the first step, and that also means you have to continue taking every first step, if you stop initiating it just ends, it's fucking boring.
>>33683969>be me>male>live near one of the major population centers on the east coast >set distance to 70 miles>set age 18-26>include trans>every other setting is set to any >in total, there are 14 girls in my area>1 requires verification so it's only 13>1 more is trans, so down to 12 cis girls>4 of them have profiles with slutty pics, meaning they're either catfish, scammers, or just whores not worth trying for an average guy>only 5 are 20 or older>90% chance your intro doesn't get a response>90% chance they're not even serious about dating, just there for lulz>even if you do meet the perfect girl, there's a 90% chance that Chad will just take her anyway This website is fucking worthless
>>3368555212 girls, just start chats with all of them and see what happens. Doesn't cost anything. Only after you've tried, will you have the right to complain.
>cute & cool girl, same interests, lives close by, has a 60% response rate>no responsei know this is nothing new at all but man, i was super interested and kept hoping she would respond. maybe im just too autistic for this
>>33685672She probably has an inbox hundreds deep. Just keep sending another chat every time you notice that she's on. Keep this up for a week or until you get blocked. I call this jeetmaxxing.
>>33683969Hi is there an app where I can find friends?
This app makes me feel absolutely ancient. I guess oldfags don't date.
>>33685822Everyone older than 22 either already has a long term partner, or has entirely given up it seems
>>33685822>OldfagsYour last boat was in 2020 old man when lots of people were using this site due to lockdowns and /soc/ was lively and somewhat decent.
I've talked to like 6 girls (and one boy that looked like a girl :3 ) off that site. All deeply mentally ill. They'll flirt hard for a day then ghost. Fucked one KHHV though. That was worth it. So it's still better than like 95% of the jew dating sites.
It's hilarious seeing girls whose profile is like "please message me I'd love to make new friends or talk to anyone I'm so lonely!!" and then their profile shows they only reply to 3% of messages.Sometimes I see one that replies to 50%+ of messages and I always message those.
should i actually use pictures of myself
does the verification selfie show up on my profile?
>>33686420i actually started getting replies after adding pics so yeah probably
Y'all bffr... This thing only work for the white users?If im even a shade darker than caucasian am I basically signing up to never hear from anyone again?
>>33685822I'm in my 40s and have got messages from girls in their 20s. Haven't met anyone yet though, but it's possible it could happen.
>>33687168The beauty standard for femcels there is a white man with a beautiful face. There are a lot of asian girls on this app too, and this type is very specifically and extremely important to them.>>33686420Why not? If you are not a shy schoolboy, then what should you be afraid of?>>33685822>tfw even girls with daddy kink didn't message you
>>33683969>Duolicious Useless crap, where everyone writes to every girl, but no one writes to you. And if someone replies to your intro, then nothing comes of it, because she has 50 more like you and she won't even reply to everyone.
>>33687181Yeah makes sense. Femcels want to meet societal beuty standards as bad as any other woman and Asians hate themselves enough to want to comoletely fetishize another skin tone.White men fill both these validations.Oh well guess it's still bars and coffee shops for me
>>33687191All dating slops are apps for girls to find attention, chads, sex, or even a partner. This kind of thing is not designed for ordinary males, period, this is not the app for you, basically. This is an app for femcels to find something interesting and have fun, not for incels.
Just look at this. Who even uses this useless site? Why? If the admin is reading this, destroy Duolicious, you just created another dump for cuckolds and narcissistic girls, who are in short supply on the site and ONLY come there to feed their ego.
>>33687225Do you realise most guys write very shitty intros that are an iteration of “hiiiiii” “i want to rape and murder you” or straight up gibberish? Most guys are there to shitpost and will leave the app in a couple of days.Try making a female account and see for yourself
>>33687251Are you a girl? Why don't you write intros to other people then?
>>33687225
>>33687260Because some of the intros I get are actually interesting and I try to have a conversation with those people. I personally can’t manage more than like 5 convos at a time so I don’t message other people in the meantime.Anyway, I’ve messaged guys first before, but I believe men should make the first move if there’s romantic interest. It’s just how things are and it’s natural
>>33687291what is an interesting intro to you? do you have examples? I dont know what standards people have for writing to them. To me its just enough to have someone talk back to you
>>33687291I'm not necessarily there just to find a girlfriend, after all we all live in different countries, I even write with an online translator. But you don't see any of them as potential husbands either, do you? You just go there to relieve your boredom. And girls should learn not to be passive in order to be interesting.
>>33687291>but I believe men should make the first move if there’s romantic interestTradwife, please. It’s 2025 already Btw, many relationships today are built on the girl taking the first step. In fact, I see more and more couples like this irl. Even plenty of handsome guys end up with sub girls simply because those girls made the first move. When a guy approaches a girl to ask her out, it often comes across as something cringe or creepy. But when a girl approaches a guy, it’s seen as much sweeter, more charming, cuter and girls tend to face far fewer rejections overall.
>>33687291>>33687332By the way, yes. I live in a country where absolutely all the girls do nothing to meet a guy, but guys come to them themselves. And in these conditions, I feel that if a guy tries to meet a girl, she thinks something like "oh no, another one." For me, this is an obstacle.
>>33687338Life is an obstacle course, git gud
>>33687375For men. Not for women.
>Approach>No response>Approach>No response>Approach>No response>Approach>No response
>>33686043Remember
>>33687291>men should step up and be traditional menAnd how traditional are you?
As a woman (female) in this app for the first time, some of you are surprisingly cute hehe
goodmornin everyonehave fun on duo today ^_^
>>33687823Stop responding to jerks and go to Search. Write to someone.
>>33687834I already have. Why are you assuming I haven't, anon?
>>33688039I got 0 intros in 2 months.
>>33688046I feel sorry you are not in my area then.
>>33688074I'm in Russia. It's a westoid little known app. I'm unlikely to be in anyone's location there. It's amazing to me to see in this track how some people set the distance to <100km and they can even find someone.
>>33688074>>33688129I'm in Russia. It's a westoid little known app. I'm unlikely to be in anyone's location there. It's amazing to me to see in this thread* how some people set the distance to <100km and they can even find someone.selffix
allow emoji reaction to messages
what the hell do i even open with. i just meow since i don't know what to say. am i just uninteresting or something. it also just doesn't feel worth the effort male btw :3
>>33688289Look at the persons profile and figure out what to say based on what is included in it. If you cannot think of anything to say after doing this, or the profile gives you nothing to open with then you're better off just not sending an intro.
>>33688294thanks this is pretty much what I've been doing. probably just haven't gotten a strong gut feeling from any one
>>33687168I’m about as pale as they come and never gotten anything for over a month now so do with that what you will.>>33687181>The beauty standard for femcels there is a white man with a beautiful face. There are a lot of asian girls on this app too, and this type is very specifically and extremely important to them.Yeah I’m casting doubt on that one, dating as a good looking White man feels impossible. Not like my standards are particularly high either. Women from every race on the planet will add me, say one thing and then never talk again. I think they just like screwing with me a bit.
>>33688322Each female account receives at least 10 intros every day. You're just one of many, and they choose who to reply to without even reading the whole intro. Maybe no one even read your intro. Especially if she's already talking to a few guys, then she'll ignore any new intros altogether.
Oh hey I got a 97% match.Oh no she only replies to 3% of intros and has never messaged anyone first.That's cool. I love this site. I love female.I'm totally not gonna have a mental break, stalk these girls, and make them pay for destroying my mental. I would never do that.
>>33688341and you guys wonder why you're single. jfc
>>33688396learn to take a joke anon.
>>33688396>>33688407No, no, no! I really wonder why the percentage is so small!
>send an intro to some cute girl, don't realise but her account was created like 10 minutes ago>feel like a creep but send intro anyway>get a reply back insta, we talk and the conversation actually goes along really smoothly>end up adding her on discord about an hour later, we talk almost all day>talk more on discord, she's acting insanely horny atp and sending nudes>return back, we both think each other are hot asf>standard conversation goes along well, eventually end up going to sleep, and on a good note>wake up and send a good morning text>"Your message could not be delivered. This is usually because you don't share a server with the recipient or the recipient is only accepting direct messages from friends."fuck my LIFE man... at least the nudes were good
>>33687397Yes. If you have the power to change that dynamic, by all means be my guest. Otherwise get with the program and succeed within the rules as written.
>>33688713Are you a developer?
If the developer is reading this, I hope he knows that this app is absolutely not for shy guys and is generally demotivating for them. I suggest considering a way to force everyone, including girls, to send intros if they want to keep getting intros. Guys never get intros anyway, but if a girl has already received 10 intros and hasn't sent any, you can block her from receiving new intros and show her a message like "you have new intros, but you've already received many intros and haven't sent any. Send one to someone." And you can show the least popular people at the top of the search results. I don't claim that this idea is the perfect solution, but it's all I can come up with after thinking for just one minute.
>>33688745Didn't Bumble already do this by forcing women to initiate? Or was that Hinge? idk.It doesn't work because women will just go somewhere else rather than use an app that forces them to put in effort.
>>33688752I have no idea what this is. Tell me more.
>>33688752If a girl sees that the app forces her to make the first move at least once every 10 intros and this makes her want to leave, then I don’t know what you can even talk about with such a girl. Such girls are obviously very narcissistic and spoiled.
>>33688760>>33688771https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bumble#Matching_users>In matches between a man and a woman, the woman must initiate the conversation with their match or the matches disappear within 24 hours;They were forced to add changes to this because women either used non-initiations like sending a period or just an emoji to pressure the man to start a conversation, or they'd use response bots to spam every single person they match with using the same message and only reading 1 out of 100 responses.>This process changed in 2024 when Bumble launched Opening Moves; the feature allows female users to add prompts to their profiles for men to respond to. For same-sex and nonbinary users, either person can use these prompts.Basically women will do literally anything to avoid initiating a conversation with a dude. It's insane.
>>33688745I actually really like this idea It could do with some tweaking but this could be a great feature I briefly used Duo when I thought I had enough social battery and was ready to meet new people, but it became overwhelming pretty quicklyI like actually giving people a chance individually, and seeing if it goes anywhere, not just being glued to my phone trying to juggle conversations and completely frying my dopamine receptors The main complaint I see about modern dating sites are: for men, it seems like women just want easy attention, never actually putting any effort in - and for women, the amount of messages, not even from men who seem compatible or genuinely interested, just messaging because it's a female This could be a good start at addressing both
>>33688776Women could solve this issue themselves by just ignoring messages received unless she initiated the conversation. Dunno why you need a feature to do it for you.
>>33688795Did you miss the entire thread of men feeling ignored by women?
>>33688809No my point is women are doing it on purpose. If you add features that incentivize the woman to message first they'll just find workarounds to maintain the status quo. Because the status quo is what they're comfortable with.Or rather, even IF you managed to force women to initiate, that just consolidates all the messages around the top 1% of men. Dating sites like OKCupid already have this data. Women's messaging habits aren't an equal distribution; they'll only initiate with a guy that ticks literally every box. If you're confident that's you then I guess it could work. For everyone else it'll just mean the site is dead for not just men but also women, and users will leave faster.
>>33688809I mean if you get ignored women aren't going to send you intros either. The site would just die.
>>33688828>>33688834
>>33688828So the problem is in women. Women's heads need to be changed.
>>33688848You can just be gay, you know. Like it's literally free. Off you go buddy.
>>33688869Homosexuality is a mental illness. A man fucking a man in the ass is abnormal, immoral and criminal.
>>33688876Fucking you is abnormal and immoral aha heyoo
Does your dick have a smell where the shaft meets the head? It's never been this strong. I'm circumcised.
>>33688957I can smell it on my fingers if I touch it. It's different from the smell of my balls.
Can a sound indicator be added to profiles, like the verified icon. I want an easier time finding voices to goon to.
>>33688952>youhttps://youtu.be/mZI6q5aFlBY
>>33688979Ok now we're asking the real questionsTfw ywn have a growler husband to also read bed times stories
Questions for femanons:>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?>Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?>>33685793I'm the wrong person to ask, but I met a significant proportion of my friends on dating apps>>33686839No, and you should never include it on your profile>>33688220It's on the to-do list but it'll take months because I want to rewrite the chat system first>>33688745>And you can show the least popular people at the top of the search results.>roll out this feature>suddenly the search results show profiles with no images, no text, no Q&A answers, and who were online 29 days ago>existing users wondering wtf happened>duodaddy frantically adds filters for those things as a mass-exodus ensues>filters applied>now the results show Duolicious' most obvious bots and biggest gooners
>>33684370>>33688745>>33688776The underlying issue you're all touching on is that women get many intros of varying quality when they should get a few high-quality ones instead. While there's some intro quality filters in place (e.g. the uniqueness requirement, offensive language filtering, verification-based daily intro limits, etc), they're obviously not enough. To me, the obvious next step to increase intro quality would be to gradually tighten the daily intro limit for unverified users until the ratio stops improving (or men start rage-quitting the app). Once conventional options like that are exhausted, I might try more experimental mechanics. Although I don't want to add a mechanic which requires women to message first because I think that'll result in even fewer good quality conversations being initiated. I also don't see much good in simply blocking intros to big inboxes without regard for intro quality. In fact, I tried something similar last year and it didn't notice any improvement in the ratio.>Is there some way to disincentivize ghosting/ one word answers?I don't think it can ever be stopped completely>>33688979>Can a sound indicator be added to profiles, like the verified iconGood idea. I made a ticket:https://github.com/duolicious/duolicious-frontend/issues/544
>>33689346>offensive language filteringI don't like the offensive language filter. I keep wanting to tell ladies I wanna shove my fat b-b-b-benis into their gushy wushy puss-ay, but it makes me change "fat" to "thick" and I don't think that gets the point across because I haven't been getting replies to that intro
>>33689341There should be an algorithm that verifies that a nice single heterosexual shy single femboy with a real verified photo, a bio in his profile and lots of answers to questions didn't get any intros. It's not fair when guys make a normal profile, but girls don't even go to the Search section to find these wonder guys there.
>>33689341in that case, is dark mode on the backlog?
[spoiler]delete your account[/spoiler]
>>33689356lol>>33689370If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that women owe you intros?>>33689392Yes, but I'm working on higher priorities right now, sorry
I'd say an Omegle-syle 1 on 1 chat system would be good, but the site doesn't even have the userbase to make such a feature functional. It'd be like Emerald Chat where there's like 20 people in one group chat, with one faggot spamming relentlessly, and then it takes 20+ minutes to find someone in a basic chat who ghosts you instantly anyway.
>>33689341>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?Both, but profile matters more>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?Shared interests maybe? So we have something to talk about >Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?Yes>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?My best convos were with matches in the 60-70% range but in the same clubs as me
>>33689346The issue is women don't respond based on the quality of the intro, they respond based on the appearance of the guy who's sending it. You can literally send "ey bbygurl wan sum fuk" and if you got a good jawline they think "oh he's flirty and fun"The natural desire of women is to actively select for negative personality traits. Narcissism, psychopathy, aggression. I don't know what wires got crossed in their evolution to make them this way but they are genuinely fucked up and continuing to allow them to select their own mates is genuinely harmful for society as a whole.
>>33689616>I don't know what wires got crossed in their evolution to make them this wayAll the women with the loyal and devoted traits that men desire were killed off in conquests of old. Like they were literally called the romance peoples. Their women would fight tooth and nail or simply choose to die when their homes would be invaded and they were threatened with a life of enslavement and rape, or they'd face a bloody death. The result being over time the genetic memory of these women simply vanished as it was bred out of the populace.
>>33689624I find it hard to truly hate women, because everything wrong with them is the result of generations of bad male influence. Truly, we live in the worst timeline
>>33689616>continuing to allow them to select their own mates is genuinely harmful for society as a wholeThat's slightly alarmingWho should do the selecting then? (not asking combatively)
a lot of male anons are very interesting, pity I can't talk to all of you. I've found mine not by a system of comparison or scale, I just answered a random intro and that was it. Now deleted account and happy, it's so easy for a female. keep searching...
>>33689455>If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that women owe you intros?I mean, I could get at least one for the 2 months in which I used this app.
Females owe me intros and also probably sex. I'm a nice guy, don't they understand that?>>33689758Lucky random guy, big win for him if true.
>send intro to a girl with < 10% response rate>actually get a response, we hit it off and have hobbies in common and similar careers>message back and forth for a few days>she stops replying out of the blue, even when I send another message a couple days laterthis has happened to me twice now, is there something wrong with me or is this app just really shitty? I have a decent profile and actual pics of myself so if they responded to my intro they surely don't think im ugly right? am I supposed to just keep sending messages or am I just too boring?
>>33690097You are supposed to get her contact info basically as soon as you feel certain she is a real person. Chatting in the app is purgatory.
>>33690104gotcha. is it worth trying to go back and ask for it now or am I just fucked and need to try again with different people?
>>33690137It won't hurt to ask.
As a guy how screwed am I if I don’t feel comfortable with providing pictures/voice verification? I’m not famous, rich, hot or ugly, I’m just average but I do find myself on the news and meeting famous people from time to time and getting recognized could tank my career.
>>33689829Well, when you put it that way, I can agree with you. It'd definitely be nice. It'd also be nice if I were rich and handsome lol.Have you ever tried other dating apps? If so, did you find one where women initiate?>>33689601>Shared interests maybe? So we have something to talk aboutIs the profile's text, or the list of clubs better for figuring out if you have interests in common with someone?>>33690205A month or two ago I tried crunching the numbers to figure out if there was any association between verification status and reply rate. Counter-intuitively, I couldn't find one. Although a lot of people in these threads report that they only started getting replies after getting photo-verified. I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe getting verified doesn't help the *average* anon because some photo-verified people are attractive and some just have bad haircuts. So it helps the attractive ones and harms the others, and the aggregate effect is zero.>getting recognized could tank my careerYou might consider adjusting your privacy filters to only allow people you've messaged to see your profile
>>33690384Good to know, thank you.
>girl messages me first>talks about meeting up>ask for time and date>no replyguys come on
>>33689341>expecting to get an honest answer about anything from womenCome on man, you know damn well that what women say they do/want and what they actually do and respond to are two vastly different things that often have zero correlation.You will get absolutely no helpful information from asking them anything and your time would be better spent trying to scrape or parse the data you collect somehow, good use case for AI actually.
why are there like zero women between 23-30?
>>33690806Any women past like 23 that is into male hobbies and has a remotely decent personality is already happily married.You'll only encounter the BPDemons and normies who took a wrong turn thinking this is Tinder.t. 30+ year old dude that stopped messaging women in my age group
>>33690384>Have you ever tried other dating apps? If so, did you find one where women initiate?Chatous. But there are a lot of bots and scammers. Both girls I am currently chatting with outside of Chatous started chatting with me first. Yes, I'm sure they are not scammers. We never talked about money or love, so they are definitely not scammers.
>>33689341>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?100% based on if he's cute but if his profile is super unappealing or his message is really bad I'll skip him even if he's perfect looking.>Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?...Yes?>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?Nah, as long as he doesn't have ideals and morals that are complete opposites of mine or is too serious it's generally whatever.
What's a guy whose soul looks like picrelated supposed to do in this app?
>>33689370>heterosexual shy single femboymy dude... come the fuck on
>>33691427>>33689370Poor russian Nice Guy, he was just a wannabe heterosexual shy single femboy with the soul of a little anime girl and the appearance of a 35-yo ugly bastard, but femcels didn't give him sex and didn't even write him an intro, even though he absolutely deserves it and is owed it. Don't despair, friend, it's not about you, it's just that duolicious is a slopapp, these stupid femcels don't know what they're losing.
>>33691727I didn't mean me.
>>33691727And I'm not a femboy. I just know a femboy from Greece on the internet who dreams of getting a girlfriend but doesn't want to do anything about it because he's insecure about his short stature. So I thought that such a guy might accidentally stumble upon this app.
>>33691427Good question… I think I’m just gonna start screwing with girls for fun at this point and see what happens. Knowing my luck that is what will get me a gf. Especially since girls have already posted that they only respond to unhinged guys anyway.
>>33691727>he was just a wannabe heterosexual shy single femboy with the soul of a little anime girl and the appearance of a 35-yo ugly bastard>she was a femcel that didn't give him sex and didn't even write him an intro, even though he absolutely deserves and is owed it>can I make it any more obvious
>>33691886>
>>33692033In my opinion, this man looks fine.
>>33683969>approach 1000 women>990 blocked immediately or never reply to intro>10 reply with 3 words, but never answer after itThink it's time delete the account and make a new.
Please make the procession of money askers stop. At least I know now there isn't a single woman who will approach and not ask for money within the first day or two of conversation.
>message girl>she doesn't respond>send another message but with a imgur link of my investments/bank accounts>she replies back>archive the conversatonget fucked
>>33688745>Guys never get intros anywayI've received multiple intros.A lot of you guys are much too invested in the idea that you'll find someone here. Women don't like neediness. Become emotionally detached, don't expect anything more than a few fleeting chats, because that's how they're using it. If they were serious about using this to find a boyfriend, every woman who signs up would be off the site within a month.
>>33692832There is one universal when dealing with any women. They can smell desperation from a million miles away, and it is the absolute worst thing ever to them.The moment you act desperate with a woman is the moment you've totally fucked up any chance you may have had.
>>33692856Which is annoying, because absolutely zero lack of desperation often means you aren't invested in them at any point. The only two girls I've ever loved never gave me the time of day, but the three girls I've been with who I borderline hated wouldn't stay the fuck away from me because I was the only not fully retarded person in our nerdy friend group.
>>33683969>98% match>relatively close location-wise>I start the conversation, goes well>"do you have vrchat? we could chat there">yeah sure that sounds fun>I log into the game's website and share my profile>"what time would you like to do this?" I ask>no response since, this was two days ago, they are still activeI guess I'll just wait for someone to message me
>>33693560>still activeBug the fuck out of her. >Are you okay??>Worried about you>Did something happen??>How did you sleep?Stay at the top of her inbox. Every day at the very least. Jeetmax it. Make it so her cowardice becomes more painful than any confrontation. She will eventually either respond or just block you and then you will at least have closure which is better than getting ghosted, and maybe she will learn a valuable lesson about leading people on and wasting people's time and toying with lonesome people's emotions.
>>33693696With this tactic it is better to send strange creepy messages instead.
>>33693923nah hes right, this works with most gen z or autists, they are socially awkward and avoidant and love the attention and being pursued
I'm thinking of promoting verified profiles in some searches. Objections? Duolicious has always promoted profiles which have images. In other words, all profiles with images have always come before all profiles without images in search results. And each of those two groups of profiles is ordered such that the highest matches come first. So the proposal is to effectively change that initial grouping from "images", to "verified images" in some circumstances.Verified people will be promoted in searches that meet all these criteria:>1. The searcher is verified>2. The searcher's highest match (in that particular search) is verified>3. The search results contain at least ~250 verified profilesThe reason for promoting verified profiles is to check if it improves the gender ratio. Since Duolicious started, one of women's most common requests was that men include pictures of themselves on their profile.The reason for having criteria instead of promoting verified profiles in every case is to:>1. Prevent verified users getting flooded with messages, particularly from unverified users>2. Allow searchers to continue seeing a reasonable number of high matches if there's not many verified users who meet their search preferencesThoughts?>>33692750Please report them. Asking for or offering money is against the rules
>>33694126It's a good idea.
It was the first time I received a long correspondence with a girl and in her last message she called me a friend. Three hours without an answer. Last time online: now
>>33694296Firstly, you should move to discord or something as soon as you can. Secondly, you need to stop assuming because they messages you back they want to spend every minute of the time they are online talking to you.
>>33694296Holy shit. Brutal, anon...>>33694126>I'm thinking of promoting verified profiles in some searches. Objections?Good idea if you want to move towards a more serious place for dating, and not towards a cesspool for memes and pranks. For some balance, you can promote such profiles only to verified users as well. Keep on mind, we also have some schizo mental folks here who want to talk only with other anime avatars and are afraid of 'normies with real photos'.
>>33693923At first keep it polite in case she is legitimately busy. Only once you are sure she's actively ignoring you will you dial up the pain. Bitch lasagna that bitch
>>33692033>t.
>>33694296>Three hours without an answer.get a fucking grip you faggot holy shit. don't be so obsessive and weird. no wonder no one wants to talk to any of you people if this is how you get after the faintest hint of interest
Trap
>>33695132>Last time online: nowIt's the equivalent of sitting face to face with somebody IRL, having a nice talk, and you suddenly look away and start ignoring him. It's that rude.
>>33695246She has dozens, possibly hundreds depending on her distance filter, of guys all trying to get her attention at once. If you don't move things off-site relatively quickly, you're just a fleeting distraction.
>>33695246no it isn't. you are the one being delusional here. she doesn't owe you anything, and getting that clingy over someone you just met is really fucking off-putting dude
>>33694296Any kind of text based messaging is asynchronous and recipients have the right to get back to you on their time not yours. Since this is a fringe dating app courteous messaging is on the order of calendar days rather than hours IMO. And since we are all strangers and anons until you can show us a ring, it is if not when.
>>33695268Are you trying to meet somebody or not? If you are, you should take every man seriously, as if he could be the one you marry someday, and be respectful. If not, then I guess just keep collecting attention cummies from as many orbiters as possible, wasting your time and everybody else's, and stay single forever.
>>33695292That's why you will end up alone, all loosed up and used.
Hi, these are my suggestions for the devs>more visibility for people with actual pictures>force profiles to have pictures, why the fuck do I see so many profiles with literally nothing, fuck lurkers>force to reply to intros to see the next X intros, you need to do something, your app is just another ego boost for girls otherwise>add the possibility (maybe mandatory?) to add just the country but not the city, everyone has private location>delete unverified profiles after some time
>>33695305>you should take every man seriously, as if he could be the one you marry someday, and be respectfulwhat the fuck are you smoking dude? maybe try realizing that you should respect women in return? you realize the world doesn't revolve around you, right? maybe she's busy. maybe she didn't see your message. maybe she just doesn't fucking feel like replying to you right now, but she wants to give her best efforts in messaging, so she's waiting until she feels up to itmessaging someone on a dating app does not entitle you to unlimited access to their person according to your timetable
>>33695314Okay, die alone
>>33695318i'm not the one crying about my situation online lmaooooo
>>33695322How many rabbits can an eagle chase at one time?
Got my first intro on this shitty thing today and it is some spambot shit
I got a girl's snapchat because I said I could give her screenshots of a project I'm coding but I can't give them to her there, so I suggested doing it in another messenger. She doesn't even understand programming :/
>>33695305Most women who use dating sites aren't actually interested in getting a boyfriend, otherwise they'd be off the site very quickly.
I forgot the archived messages exist, why do people message then immediately archive? post nut clarity?
>>33695503Then the app developers need to make the experience less favorable for people like that, and more favorable for people who are seriously searching. Maybe hide all intros if you have unread messages in your inbox. Hardcore mode: hide new intros if you have UNANSWERED messages in your inbox.
>>33695551>just make the site unusable for women bro surely that'll fix it
>>33695621Did you even read what I wrote? What sounds unusable about that?
>>33696180>send 300 messages before you can use the app
>>33695504like all interactions with women or especially "women", this app is best used drunk
>>33694132>>33694312>>33695310I've promoted verified profiles as of half an hour ago. For now, I promoted verified profiles even if they only have their basics verified. Although this will still make profiles with verified pictures more likely to appear first.The promotion algorithm will leave many people's search results unaffected. People most likely to see verified profiles be promoted are:>women>normies (as determined by their Q&A answers)>people in densely populated areas>people with very broad search filtersPlease let me know if any of you see anything you don't like about search results
duolicious DATING app splinter! sorta endorsed by the dev of duolicious. we have more fun here, og one is dead.come shitpost, meet cuties, get color roles, play with dumb bots, blogs, stuff like that!18+neets, weebs, gamers, edaters, incels, femcels, losers, a few kinda normal people- shitposting & hanging out.come find your ekitten or whatever.https://discord.gg/uEWyaX5MwX
>>33696892How get photo verification? I got basics, then uploaded a selfie in that order. Did I need to upload the selfie first?
this is the worst website of all time
I have a suggestion! If someone wrote to you last, but you opened a chat room and didn't reply within a week, that person simply disappears from your chat room list forever and you become hidden for that person forever!
>>33697519That said, the system should realise that you are a regular visitor to the site and are able to respond if you wanted to.
>>33697449she did literally nothing wrong. if she hadn't replied at all, you'd be pissing your pants over how women are so evil for ignoring nice guys like you and how you totally just need someone to give you a chance
I went thru verification and passed but duo confused me. It said "you can verify photos later". I thought that was what i was doing? What does it mean? Im still getting profiles that say "verification required".
>>33697685When you upload your verification photo it checks against what's already there. If you have no photos of yourself public, it doesn't check for that. But if your photo matches your age, sex, ethnicity, it'll clear those.
>>33697685>>33697696Oh and in addition to that there are two levels of verification. A person can choose to set it up so that only the basics need to be verified, but there's another option where you have to be photo-verified to message them.
>>33697696>>33697702ah, so it seems that it couldnt match my verification photo to my other photosmy haircut has changed so many thats why
>>33697682>Be grateful that girls act like cunts because the alternative is being a passive cuntI honestly wish I was gay sometimes.
>>33697682You ever wonder why women can't find dates anymore?
>>33697449She's into you, bro, I can tell, just be more confident
>>33683969Okay I keep seeing the ads. Does anyone actually go on dates on this app or do you all collectively use it to laugh at desperate losers like me?
>make intro>get response>can never follow up
>>33697449maddie's one of the og users of the site. shes gotten actually like 1k+ messages. no wonder she doesn't give a shit about you.
>>33698646https://x.com/DuoliciousApp/status/1852578038099361948
I’m trying this app out and it’s making me think I’m a lot uglier than I realized :(
>>33698917I personally blame my phone camera. I know I'm ugly but fuck every time I try taking a selfie I look worse than I do in a mirror. Stupid gay-i bullshit.
>>33683969no hot bitches will look for breathing dildos on an "open-source dating app"
I hope women want a breathing dildo on this app because I signed up
>>3369885129.5% of respondents can safely be banned from the app
>>33699093I don't care about hot bitches. It can be ugly bitches as long as you're fun to talk to and are down to clown around. I'm actually pretty miffed that the "4chan Open Source Dating App" has mostly just attracted 7/10 and higher failstacies that otherwise want a normal dating experience and don't have that many otaku interests. Where are the 300lb gaming fujoshi that are equally as degenerate about sexting but otherwise would like to be friends/partners that discuss their lives and interests to find a connection between the urges.
>>33698851Well it's better than zero I guess.Are you running an ELO algorithm similar to other big dating apps? Or do we actually get meaningful matches and the people in your poll are just fumbling?Any plans to address the 30% that are just dicking around?
im retarded for verifying again now it wont do my photos
>talk to some bitch in Norway for like a month>constantly bitches and moans about guys blocking her>"oh woe is me im an incel another guy blocked me">"youre gonna block me too i bet">"guess who got blocked by another guy">refuses to send pics but has no problem vcing>tell her i dont wanna be catfished and she keeps leading me on>every thing i ask about her she dodges>told her today i dont like her being secretive due to past ex cheating on me and ruining my life (cringe ik but she asked about it)>blocks me after i say being secretive is not a good look>says im playing the victim and blocks me>all cuz i asked how many languages she knows, a question she asked me first which i answeredMai if you can see this i hope you know that the reason guys keep blocking you is because youre a fucking boring retard with no personality. you are the common denominator in every conversation that leads to you being blocked or ghosted. you bitch about no guy wanting to talk to you but every time youre asked a remotely personal question like your favorite food or band or whatever you put on this autistic secretive persona. So fucking tiresome. this cunt had the nerve to ask me how im good looking and still single. cuz the market is oversaturated with annoying cunts like you. most dudes wanna get off these apps not waste their lives talking to vapid trad larping thots like you.
>>33699679>women self-sabotaging from fear of commitment No wai
>>33699679genuinely why the fuck would you talk to someone who acts like this for a month? favorite color food etc are literally first conversation type questions. what the fuck did you two even do on call together?
>>33699679she dropped me the other day because i defended lolicon
>>33699073Get a tripod, your arm's just not long enough.
>>33699971Hide you power level you stupid nigger unless the girl shares the same thoughts and feelings.
>>33699537There's no ELO algorithm. But IIRC, relationships are typically more long-lasting when both partners are about equally attractive. A cynic might argue that Tinder removed their ELO system to increase the odds of users becoming single and subsequently returning to Tinder>Any plans to address the 30% that are just dicking around?I imagine things like verification status and # of Q&A answered give a good indication of how serious someone is on DuoliciousHinge's strategy is to have a very long sign-up process that causes many would-be users to drop out. Hinge can do that because they're the authority on long-term dating>>33699614Email support@duolicious.app
>>33697682It's telling how you instantly knew she's a girl and I'm a guy.>>33698791>og userIt's a fucking dating site. Step back and think about how pathetic you soundThis website is nothing but maddies
>>33700754she was an og user from before anyone but 4channers used it. when the first wave of twitter fags came on, she was one of the girls that a ton of dudes spammed, because she was one of the few girls on the whole site.
>>33700799>literal thousands of men approach her>rejects every single oneGreetings from Kazakhstan
>>33697449>>33698791>Fat femcel>Fat retard >Chubby >Ugly>19 yo autist>not looking for a relationshipJust imagine... And thousands of incels (!) still run after her and spam her dm
>>33695621How are you managing to play the victim? You’ve got 200 pound girls here who won’t even say hi to 9/10 guys way out of their league, doesn’t get more one sided than that.
>>33701352be fr there are no 9/10 guys on this app
>>33701422There's me
bros how do I talk to women unironicallya qt messaged me but I haven't opened it because I'm scared I'll spill my spaghetti
>>33687291You aren't traditional and we aren't in the 1970s. You want natural wipe that makeup off. We are in 2025, women are asking men out and that's how it should be. No more stupid still games. No more humiliating rituals just hey ya want to go out? Really changed the game
Is using an alt account allowed? I forgot the password for my original one and I want to use a new one.
>>33689346Well I'm getting tired of the whole I have to put I. 20 times the effort to get nothing whole women sit there and get thousands. This crap happens on every app and only one or two has ever done anything to remediate it. This app is no different from the rest.
>>33698851I've been dating a girl from duo since May last year, thanks for the app king
if the app is so trash, why are some guys with reply rates of below 20% still on it after months if not a whole year?
>>33702220All dating apps are trash but there's always the slight possibility that a woman actually looking to date and who likes you will show up one day. No harm done in casting many lines and leaving them out there.
>>33702220Girls love these apps because these apps allow them to boost their self-esteem. There they get a lot of attention and they like it. It's like a drug for them. Some of them use it, even they have a husband and children.
>>33702220Why delete my profile when instead I could mildly stick it to duodaddy and force him to pay another $0.0009/mo to keep it up when I'm not using it. Then I just happen to revisit it months later after seeing the thread on /soc/ again, see all the scam and spam messages I got, and send pervy messages to women about how I genuinely want to get to know them but also their fat mommy milkers, and then stop when that doesn't work so I leave and the cycle begins again.
Is messaging down for anyone else?
>>33702220we are willing to sift thru tons of shit in the hopes of finding a nugget of gold
who the fuck keeps making all these accounts of brown girls with red text on black backgrounds posting /x/ shit and having a shitload of clubs
Few more recs for the dev>add reply function like disc, whatsapp or any other messaging app, to allow to reply to specific messages. Especially important to msg women since a lot of them divide their discussion in a lot of texts. >allow sending pictures by integrating an AI that can filter or censor nudes (maybe add some sort of option to allow or disallow receiving nudes? >add possibility to send voice recordings>send me a gf by post>>33702391who's gonna tell him...
>>33701422The TikToker who caused the app to go viral in May was pretty good looking. I think his appearance is partly why his dating-related content went viral>>33701832Sometimes I ban alts when it looks like the later one is a catfish. If the latest account is verified, you should be safe>>33701837>only one or two has ever done anything to remediate itWhich apps?>>33701915>since May last yearGood to know that Duolicious works when flooded with normies>>33702380>Why delete my profile when instead I could mildly stick it to duodaddy and force him to pay another $0.0009/mo to keep it up when I'm not using itI kneel>>33702391>Is messaging down for anyone else?Has it been happening consistently during the past few days, during this time of day? I recently reduced server resources allocated to chat in an attempt to reduce the amount of donations we need. Though it sounds like it's made chat flaky during peak periods>>33702513I know. I'm working towards those things (more slowly than I'd like)
I am very likely the only user in my country
>>33702220You really only need like one decent girl to reach out. It’s annoying how many guys on here blow it, I’m shadow banned though so at least I have an excuse. Kinda fun to browse around and just look at all the different profiles.
Success stories here are just elaborate LARPs.
>>33703340How do you not blow it? I'm not one to get schizo or send 5 messages in 1 go. I usually try to open a convo normally. Only issue is not knowing where to go after someone responds.
>>33702881Anon your strategy is very humorous, reading your advice itt has brought me joy
>>33702675nta but the only app that comes to mind for me is hinge when they announced women have to start closing their dms to keep getting new ones or something.
>>33703560obviouslynobody is meeting up from duolicious lol except the same guys and chicks who were already meeting up and fucking on the other dating apps
>>33697363Yes you upload all the images you wanted verified then go through the verification process. Found this out when I was fucking around the app.
>>33689341You should also ask for the Nona/femanon demographics if possible.>Latina, 34, unpopulated midwestern area.>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?For myself it was both. I went through look at the matches and went down by compatibility and number of answers to their questions. I thought the avoidant attachment style and the anxious attachment style was important enough to gander at if they had high numbers of questions answered. But if they had a low number I would look at their profiles if they were also looking for marriage or long term dating and some specific questions in the questionnaire that pops up first. If too many of those questions I looked up were not the same as mine I ignored them outright. Then finally distance. If they were more than an 8 hour drive away I’m likely not going to see them anyway. >Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?Yes. If the conversation is engaging enough then going to discord after 5 messages proven to be most successful.>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?Comparing to the people who eventually received my contact information and I’m still in contact with them after a month. They were all individuals that scored 80+ who are 27-36 years old. I am set up to physically date someone next week in person so we shall see if that is successful because he’s physically is closest to me. There are 2 others that I like but require a lot more planning to see. If they paid for my fare to see them I would have taken time off to see them but if it’s on my dime it’s planned vacation routes with super cheap fares near them so they will have to meet me near my trip destination.
>>33703803>I’m still in contact with them after a month.>I am set up to physically date someone next week in person so we shall see >There are 2 others that I like but require a lot more planning to see>If they paid then okLMAO, imagine being those two unironically
>>33689616>I don't know what wires got crossed in their evolution to make them this wayIt's the reproductively unretarded thing to do. Baby batter is free, what's difficult for women is getting resources for her and her children, and protection from predators or their most promising kids being killed by others.Hence the ones that were the most reproductively successful ended up those that selected for 1) protector+provider 2) provider, with some protector kids on the side 3) protector kids if they could somehow get enough resources to surviveIf you've been to mixed regions, you know the poorer and less civilized the situation is, the more men usually have to put on machismo and look violent so someone doesn't try to take theirs. Hence the bad boys that look like they'll crack your skull (and that have a gang so you can't get the jump on them) end up being more attractive on a primal level, if one can't secure a man who's both a good protector and a good provider.>inb4 blackpill r9k its joeverThat's the general mechanism, but we're lucky that women have a much wider variety of things that can attract them - basically anything that makes you valuable to the tribe on one hand (good fighter, artist, scientist, good at sports), as well as even more things based on their feeelings (bad boy ex fucked her up too much and now she wants someone loyal even if less chad, you use the same perfume and remind her of her dad or HS teacher crush), so don't lose hope, and don't LDAR
>>33703896world's oldest profession
>>33703896I would be taking on all of the costs to visit them and due to their professions and skepticism they do not want go to the middle of bumfuck no where. They’ve proposed to visiting half way which would still be in the middle of nowhere and more expenses on my behalf due to the remote area of the Midwest I am. If I was next to a major traveling hub there wouldn’t be much issue. If they paid for one way of the travel great would speed meeting each other. But I’m not gonna beg them for what should be offered. There is one thing to talk online and another to be in person. Which distance doesn’t change.
>>33704013Yeah sounds about right, if the people weren’t so nice and things weren’t so cheap the Midwest would unironically be genuine hell.
What if I'm gay? Are tue fag prospects better on this site?
Yes, add me lomboextra@gmai.com
>start using duolicious>want to meet women so I can date one and hopefully find a wife to build a family with>start answering the question>haha this is kind of fun>all of the women are 18 year olds or weirdos with 5% reply rate>the questions however are quite funhey dev can you just release a version of the app where it's just the questions? thanks this is fun
terrible ass name
>>33689341>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?I sometimes give a quick look at the profile, but usually I go straight to the first message. I’d say the first message itself is the most important for me.>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?I’m not sure what’s the most important, but I usually respond to funny intro’s. But the best starters that actual conversations come from people who at least looked at my bio and pick a topic from that to talk about. Just don’t ask the same questions every other dude asks, because it basically means I have to give the same answer for the 1000th time and that’s really off putting. On another note, I really hate the “do you want to be my friend?” And the “what do you want to talk about.” openers. Brother in Christ I don’t know you, just start talking instead of edging yourself for a conversation.>Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?Definitely, but I guess the first message had to be fun/interesting enough to get the convo started tho.>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?I’d say I never really noticed a difference in quality of conversations between the 70 and 90 range. I do hate seeing 50% the most tho, it just means you’re either not going to be serious or you’re probably a troll account.Side note: I don’t understand all the countermeasures against women ghosting/not giving replies. The only effective counter measure against it would be having decent conversation skills.
>>33705870>All these requirements and preferences for the first message>didn't write a single intro herself>The only effective for you would be having decent conversation skillsWomen.
>>33701830>era of bra-burning feminists and free love because of no AIDS>traditional
>>33703968You're assuming those violent and aggressive men are better protectors and providers. They're more likely to get themselves killed through poor decision making, and kill their offspring/mate in a fit of rage. They "succeeded" reproductively through mass rape. It doesn't matter of they kill half their children and females when they forcefuck a dozen women and leave her to raise the child.
>>33705870>Side note: I don’t understand all the countermeasures against women ghosting/not giving replies. The only effective counter measure against it would be having decent conversation skills.low sentience commentthe only effective countermeasure is good looks/correct genetic configuration
>>33705903>All these requirements and preferences for the first messageIt’s the very basics of a human interaction? Just talk about a topic you think the other person is likely passionate about to have a bigger chance of a succesful interaction.>didn't write a single intro herselfWhenever I open the app, I have to spend a great amount of time responding to openers and existing conversations. I’m not the one begging for replies. >The only effective for you would be having decent conversation skills.I think reading comprehension skills would also do wonders for you. >Women.Okay buddy
>>33705870>>33705983If you want to be credible, go make a male account and chat up some women. You're just not going to understand until you try it.
>>33705870>I've had the same conversation 1000 times and it never leads anywhere>It's the 1000 men who are the problemYou have to converse back. It's like playing catch. When you catch the ball, you have to toss it back. When a guy asks >What did you do today? an acceptable answer is NOT >Nothing, hbu?because you didn't contribute anything to the conversation. Whereas something like>Nothing, I was tired from doing XYZ all weekgives something to grab onto.>>33705983>Whenever I open the app, I have to spend a great amount of time responding to openers and existing conversations. You don't. There is ZERO CHANCE that you are having QUALITY conversations with that many guys at once. Guaranteed you are having endless chitchat that leads nowhere.Pick one that seems most promising, and give him your attention until you can decide to either quit the app and pursue a relationship with him, or block him and keep looking. All the other intros can wait. A guy would rather hear back from you a week after he sends his intro, and then have an engaging conversation, rather than an instant reply of >haha>ye>nah Of course, this is all assuming that you actually want to find a relationship, not just farm attention.
>>33706310> You have to converse back. It's like playing catch. When you catch the ball, you have to toss it back. When a guy asks You’re totally missing the point here. “What have you done today” is the most boring question in existence. Just start yapping about one of your interests, it has a bigger chance of a positive response. Questions that were put effort into get effort responses. Standard questions get standard answers, it’s not that deep.>You don't. There is ZERO CHANCE that you are having QUALITY conversations with that many guys at once.I have met up with 5 people from duo so far. Two weren’t even from the same continent. Yes, there are men on duo that aren’t totally socially inept.>give him your attention until you can decide to either quit the app and pursue a relationship with him, or block him and keep looking. All the other intros can wait.Lmao there would be even more guys crying on Soc about not getting a response then.
>>33706444Okay, sounds like you have it all figured out then. Why even post? Go hang out with your husband.
>>33706444>What have you done today” is the most boring question in existenceNo it not, it's a normal question holy shit what's wrong in your head?
>>33707463It's a boring question if you're a boring person
Is there any point in using this if I need to set my distance to 1000km to find another person in the search?
I love the men shitting on the women posting in these threads and at the same time trying to get these same women on /soc/ and Duo. If y'all yap like y'all do in these threads, no wonder women aren't responding to y'all. They have 100s of messages, be interesting. If you can't that sucks ass. It's also online dating, so looks play a part. I checked my women's friend's duo and it's just a cesspool. Bad pictures, sloppy folks. Racists. As a dude, I've gotten two dates off duo, and I'm not even conventionally attractive or attractive in general. I just know how to fucking yap and chat.I'm 5'6, black. I literally have the worst chance on duo than 99% of the men that post and I still get adds on discord and replies on duo.
>>33707508Watch the guys here say that it's because you're Black and all women are whores after the BBC.People will do anything but look inwards.
>>33703783does this mean if i already verified but i added new photos, i need to redo the processalso, how does one reorder pics in the browser? i tried dragging but nothing happened, and clicking on the pics opens a os pic picker
>>33707508>yap and chatI might as well ask, any advice on how to do this? I try to talk about something on the profile or a bit about myself, and it just doesn't work. Either I get no reply for weeks or a a single dry sentence. A few times the entire convo has been me typing a few lines and the reply being a few words. At first I thought It was a bad idea to talk about myself and ask questions but I see many women I talk to don't do this.
>>337077321. Experiences. Literally just chat. If I match with someone on tinder, or someone replies to my intro (which is random depending on what I send): I either follow up on the intro, ask about something in their profile, or just chat. Don't need a huge paragraph, but grasp their interest. Someone was interested in Madoka Magic. I watched like one episode in the past, and could care less, but I sent some random ass meme that caught her attention. She asked if i watched. "hell no, i watched one episode, couldn't stand -insert character-, but I liked a similar anime called "----". know anything similar to madoka that's not madoka?" open ended questions. if they don't reply.. number 22. Learn to move on. If some chick you weren't interested in was trying to hit you up on discord every 2-3 days, you'd be annoyed. especially if you were talking to someone else/doing something else. Or hell, if a friend you simply didn't want to talk to did the same, you'd be annoyed. If someone isn't replying for weeks at a time, move the fuck on. This ain't a soulmate, it's just a girl.If someone you're talking to or trying to talk to doesn't have anything in her profile you can ask or yap about..why message her? cause she's a girl? move on and find someone you actually wanna talk to. 3. respect yourself. like really, respect yourself. Do you really want to talk to someone who leaves you on read for days/weeks at a time? One double text is fine to see if she responds? she doesn't, number 2 again. In your double text, you better gather some fucking interest again. that madoka girl? i'd watch episode two or some shit, or the anime she recommended if it got to that point (it didn't, she was weird) and then i'd make a comment about that. Don't make it seem like youv'e been waiting for her response for weeks.and honestly just chat like your'e chatting with your homies. :/
>>33707751dont' be terminally online either. amount of guys that add me (im a dude) for friendship, but just spend all their time online doing nothing. If you're gonna be online atleast do something interesting.like be real. If a clone of you was made and tried to befriend you, would you enjoy talking to yourself or would you bore yourself?
>>33706444>Yes, there are men on duo that aren’t totally socially inept.>not wanting someone who is socially ineptHow do you types of people manage to even come across this board???
>>33707508>2 datesDiscord chats don’t count.
>>33708022But... I thought e-dates counted too...
>>33707508I love how the incels on this board are always crying about not being successful on duo. We’re one of the few people who are actually giving advice and all the self loathing incels can’t handle the possibility that they might have to improve certain qualities of themselves. It’s like they’re really allergic to self reflection and self accountability. They rather blame external factors so they have an excuse to never change. I can write the most clear, neutral and concise advice in the world and they will still get all emotional and misinterpret everything. I’m honestly done checking out these duo threads and replying to these surveys, since it’s just incels crying and circlejerking. Watch them cry even about this.
>>33707724So if you verified once then ad the following picture will not be verified so you have to do it all over again. As for changing order no drag and drop but you will have to delete one image then reload that slot. At least that’s how it worked before. Idk if there were some quality of life changes on that yet.
>>33707472Nigga it just depends if you’re willing to travel for someone that shows promise or not. Or if that person is willing to travel to you.just you know feel it out.
Oh I think if you have anime profile pics it’s ok and a couple of memes but the most successful guys that showed up on my feeds also posted some selfies that look well framed and lit. Don’t under estimate sunlight guys and if you can’t selfie ask someone to take your pic at the park or something.
>>33708121is clear advice saying>just go to the gym bro>just go to bars broetc etc. they get upset because theyve likely already tried your advice or its the most obvious general of general shit that any idiot could think of
>>33708175Most incels think going to the gym will fix all their probllems. It wont. If you're a boring or shitty person, lifting something heavy wont change that.Learn some fucking skills, get a hobby that isn't video games, go and do shit.There is more to self improvement than lifting heavy weights, and doing shit like this will actually give you something to talk about with girls as well.
>>33708175It’s general crap because that’s all uncles can think in simple terms about what’s holding them back. Oh I’m out of shape shallow women don’t want me. If you don’t like your body then go to the gym. But it’s not just that guys. There is a certain mindset that healthy well adjusted men have that’s hard to learn but that mindset leads to so many positive choices and outcomes that accumulate to being a desirable man.
