Which is the best career option for a footballer: passing thru many clubs or staying at one club only?
>>142948808Three clubs.I remember when I was a kid.I wanted to play for AIK Stockholm, then Bayern München and then finish my career in Inter.
If you're an absolute world class player, you wanna lead several big clubs to trophiesBut if you're not quite that level, staying at one club can boost your legacy
one-club players have more sovl and dignity than multi-club mercenary cucks
for me it's Ronaldo, played for Barca, Real, Inter and Milan and was loved in every one of them.
>>142948808why not both
>>142948808It’s obviously very hard to only play for one club and have an elite career these days, because the modern system with its money has created a very strong club hierarchy. There are like 10 clubs at the top and you cannot really hope to start your career with them. Likewise, these clubs are more likely to eventually replace you. But in general, being loyal to a single club (or maybe two or something, I don’t think anybody will mind you starting your career somewhere else) is better. Not only does it give yourself stability in life and implies something is going right in your career, it also means you are more likely to break records and find the love and respect of the fans. And that’s great if you want to be rememberedAt some point, changing clubs over and over makes you look like a caricature, no matter how good you are. But the modern business average probably is 5 clubs or so anyway, that was unheard of 50 years ago
>>142950176because one contradicts the otherwhat the fuck
>>142950654https://youtu.be/w9wi0cPrU4U?si=3-myFREGZg7nVjES&t=6
I prefer the Morata way.
