/femfat/ - Female Fatfur Thread: Resolution EditionPrevious Thread: https://https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/72028515Writefag Pastebin: https://controlc.com/0b7441a9Paid content: https://kemono.party/artistsDownload artist's Furaffinity archive: https://furarchiver.net/Sister threads:/mfat/ - Male Fatfurs - >>72119939/pokebig/ Pokemon - >>72156486/mbp/ My Big Pony >>72077259>Keep it female-focused (See sister threads for details).>Try to keep a slow pace of images and embrace discussion!>No 3D please, there's other threads better suited for that!>Try to keep a good balance of related fetishes and sub-fetishes.>If someone doesn't care for your specific tastes, don't bitch about them.>Avoid reposting images from the past few threads. Keep it fresh!>Keep your garbage art to a minimum>Be sure to make the next one after the current thread gets pruned/deleted.QOTT: What is your resolution this year?
Been awhile
>>72156738>What is your resolution this year?World conquest.
ough
I can't get enough of DoctorDJ's chubby anthro females. They're not huge, but they're big enough. Dayum.
DAYUM
I love her
>>72160739>>72160739>quite possibly the worst animated disney film>anthropomorphized designs of normally feral characters>maleeat cat shit
>>72161352Same>>72161369The only thing Home on the Range had going for it was the character designs and voice actors. Everything else about the movie sucked. I couldn't watch much of it before moving onto watching something better/worth my time.
Okay, anon. You like Dragontzin. Cool. No need to spam the thread to death with his art.
>>72156738Can someone drop the thread Template? Id rather just make the thread myself than wait three weeks for a new one
>>72162391
>>72162391I scrolled through Desuarchive and can't find a singular /femfat/ template. The texts in the OP posts seem to have changed significantly, and the only links to a template in the recent ones all come from /mfat/, and they're attached to /mfat/ templates slapped onto /femfat/ threads. >>72162427Why did you reply to him with a fat Rouge? What?
>>72162785Those were both me i forgot to attach a complimentary fatty to the og post lol
>>72162799Hahahah. I still think we need a thread template, though. Also, there's something about this thread's OP post that's been bothering me:>>Keep it female-focused (See sister threads for details).>(See sister threads for details).Why do I need to look at the other fat threads to understand what I should be posting in FEMALE FAT FUR? This /femfat/. We're posting fat furry females. It's incredibly simple.
Big cheese
>>72160387>belly squishing around railingHNNGHH
>>72161369It's female-focused, which is enough, it doesn't have to be exclusively female.
My dick just fucking exploded.
>>72171476>at last, a belly peekOOUUGGHH
>>72177390time to loose 10 pounds in an hour.
>>72177390>big giraffe neck>no accompanying TOWER of neck rollsSad!
>>72176473i swear i recognize the model this is referenced from, especially the double upper thigh roll, but can't remember who
After almost a year or not drawing them.
>>72187309Bonusart’s brain’s melting.
Big rex milf
Chonklivia
Big shork
>>72190127whiteraff?
BigJB21
Tried to draw for /trash/ again
>>72195128Very cute cow gal royce! how have you been?
>>72196093Been stuck on IRL events, but things are looking up finally.Thanks, tho.Also the character is from the spanish Nior comic called Blacksad. She is a nurse in a hospital.
>>72196197Glad things are looking better. I played the blacksad game a few years ago but i don't think she was in it. I am quite partial to cow gals so these are great!
There's a pokemon thread, you know.
>>72170469Viro's art isn't bad per se, but man he's really just stuck in the early 2010s forever. No real attempt to improve on shapes and anatomy, and the way-too-shiny-and-high-contrast airbrush rendering is 15 years out of date. He's one of those cases that never got worse, but also never got better so he's just lagging behind all the great newer artists that've come along in the past decade.
>>72202495Good. All the attempts to "improve" anatomy and the like has just led to a lot of ugly "realistic" characters with unsightly features and blemishes, and people thinking they've "improved" as artists for downgrading in that manner.
>>72202627Stagnation is not good at all and this has nothing to do with the recent trend of deliberately ugly "realistic" styles. All good artists are constantly improving regardless of style. There's potential in Vito's style with its light anime inspirations, but he just doesn't want to build upon it so it looks the same as it did a decade ago. Someone who's been doing digital art for almost 20 years should be capable of doing soft rendering closer to the level of something like pic related than "Little Timmy discovers the airbrush tool".
>>72203012Where does it end? It comes off like the concept of "chasing the dragon" - a drug use phrase referring to seeking something that cannot be acquired. It's like there's a cultural zeitgeist that has appeared in a number of circles that often don't overlap where it's considered a forbidden sin to be satisfied with one's lot in life, and to consider the present evil in favor of a theoretical and vaguely defined future. You can see the results of this in the art sphere by looking at how many artists "improve" their way into making ugly, lumpy, rolly, slobby characters, how many "improve" their way into having every drawing involve exposed breasts that are not shaped like actual breasts, and in fact genuinely look like balloons, down to and including the nipples and areolas looking like the tied knot and directly surrounding areas. Often times, the artist, if they had drawn exposed breasts and nipples before, had actually drawn breasts truer to how breasts actually appear BEFORE their "improvement".
>>72203310I get what you're saying but there's so many far better artists to be having this conversation about, and you keep proving my point with the images you're posting. If Viro actually bothered to improve over the past decade his art would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with what you just posted, but instead it's just "Great for early 2010s DeviantArt fatfur art standards", which is mediocre today.
>>72202495what do you think the way-too-shiny-and-high-contrast trend of the 2020's is going to be?
>>72203870It's already here, it's excessive hue-shifting with no consideration for values
>>72156738
i wanna plap
>>72203310>muh anti realismso tiring
ough peggy
>>72203870Binary brush, increasingly basic and geometric styles meant to resemble Y2K era art, basic colors, and simplistic shading
>>72203310Artists usually settle on an art style that matches the amount of time they want to spend on each drawing.
